699,178 posts

People like her makes me feel ashamed to be a women

Reddit View
April 11, 2019
140 upvotes
https://i.redd.it/zrkup5bi4nr21.jpg


Post Information
Title People like her makes me feel ashamed to be a women
Author juicysox
Upvotes 140
Comments 52
Date 11 April 2019 01:53 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/708311
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/bc057i/people_like_her_makes_me_feel_ashamed_to_be_a/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–]seatbelt-malfunction18 points19 points  (4 children) | Copy

Ao does anyone have a link to said picture?

...its for research...

[–]juicysox13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

[–]seatbelt-malfunction11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

My dude. You're the MVP of my work day. Thanks

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[–]6xxy1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

“It’s so pure. It’s me in my element.” She should clean her fucking element and learn what pure is. Probably thinks it was art, too!

[–]Lentriox45 points46 points  (5 children) | Copy

Yet no men got credit for the black hole image even though they did more work.

[–]UberCookieSlayer0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Actually, Katie Bouman played a key role in the project with an algorithm she wrote, so its more of how infuential her part was in the completion of the project

NO WAIT, appearently another person, actually did more, so its more than likely a sjw thing, she wrote 2500 lines of code while another guy wrote 850, 000 lines

[–]PorkBomber0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Actually, Katie Bouman played a key role in the project with an algorithm she wrote, so its more of how infuential her part was in the completion of the project

I've read that the algorithm was actually developed and released by a team of Japanese scientists 2 years ago. Is this true?

[–]UberCookieSlayer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not sure on the exacts at the moment, I just mentioned someone who did more for the sake of explanations, at the time of making this, its almost 4 AM, get to you when I can

[–]UberCookieSlayer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Alright, I'm back, while I don't know the exact of the development, i have heard that Katies contribution to the thing was miniscule compared to others, and I distinctly remember that it took some time to make

[–]SophistMonk28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pretty sure sex has nothing to do with this. If you are a teacher, don't get naked and let your students see it. Really ignorant for searching out a scape goat in the way she did. How are these people responsible for the moulding of our children minds when theirs are dog shit.

[–]HBenedek3813 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Tits matter when she puts on a low cut blouse to get a raise, but suddenly it's irrelevant when it's about going topless...

[–]MarkAurelios13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Egh. Just another whore trying to game the system to get a free out of jail card.

[–]der-dunkle3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

The argument might sound a bit "feminist" and silly, but I think she is not that wrong.

What's the big deal about female breasts to fire somebody for that?

Really annoying are just those feminists who like to provoke by showing tits *and* then complain about men looking. Or those feminists who complain about other women for showing something because men might like it.

In general are "feminists" who are sex-positive and just want equal rights and duties not the problem. But as a small parts of the feminists are like that I do not identify them as feminist, but rather as normal woman.

[–]juicysox4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

So, she got fired because her breasts were exposed all over middle school where she taught. They fired her for being a bad influence to other children. School wise and professional wise, I personally believe that a man will get fired as well if he posted a picture of himself topless because it isn’t professional or decent. Imagine finding a picture of your male teacher posting a topless picture of himself. It’s weird. And I’m talking about society in the 21st Century here. Say you’re a male, and you want to get a job at a very professional work office. However, when your interviewer looks you up on google, they see countless shirtless pictures of yourself. Do you think you will get the job? Absolutely not. It does not matter if you’re a female or a male taking a topless picture of yourself, you still won’t get the job regardless. The only difference is that only a female feminist would complain that it’s “gender discrimination” because they’re females who likes to be superior to men.

[–]typicalmexicanOG1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pretty sure it would've been worse if it was a I Guy

[–]AGuesthouseInBangkok1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

She absolutely should not be fired.

Nudity should not be a crime or grounds for termination from anything.

They're just tits.

This kind of outdated, Puritanical, religious, anti-human, anti-sex mania has no place in modern times.

Anyone, man or woman, should suffer zero consequence for walking down a public beach or street, as such a walk would in no way infringe or trespass against anyone else's rights, natural or constitutional.

[–]hellabad4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

so if these middle school girls started following what the teacher did and they sent their friends topless pics would that be ok? What about making them the wallpaper on their phones? What if the students started using the nude of the teacher as the wallpaper?

Is it still just tits?

[–]AGuesthouseInBangkok0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes.

In all of the cases you described, I don't see anyone being violated, assaulted, or stolen from.

If there is no victim, there should be no crime.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, run nuded on the steet should be allowed /s

[–]FightTheWorm0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

It is impossible to be a women. You could be a woman, but not a women.

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes. Yes. I understand my grammatical error sir

[–]kisuperf0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy

she didn't say that, her MALE attorney did and she didn't send it to a student, it was for her boyfriend

this a big break for you OP? weak, next

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

I didn’t say that she sent it to a student, nor did I say that she sent it to her male attorney, what are you talking about?

[–]kisuperf0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy

this question is just about as pointless as the other questions you've asked r/AskReddit

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

I love how your most recent post is an insult that is intended towards women, on an anti-feminist related sub, yet here you are over here, being an absolute hypocrite.

[–]kisuperf0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

that’s not how r/inceltears works... just get a better argument and come back. dude next

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

You even posted this on r/feminism. I don’t think that’s how that subs works either.

[–]kisuperf0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

dude... really clear you’re younger and wanna have a “gotcha” moment here. again get a better talking point on feminism and then comeback

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

My age doesn’t have to do anything with this, all I’m just saying is that you’re a hypocrite.

[–]kisuperf0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

literally look at the photo! goku is calling him an incel, idk how much more negative of a label you can put on some one

[–]Owletic0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I actually have to agree with her. If she wants to post a topless picture online then let her. It's not like she's sending it out to the students

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I totally get that. But it’s still indecent and unprofessional. Even if a man posted a picture of himself topless, they would get fired. Imagine going to a job interview, at a very professional work place. Do you think the interviewer will allow such a man to get a job there if they saw a picture of him posing, topless in front of a mirror online? Or just imagine seeing a picture of your own male teacher shirtless. Either way, It’s still weird and highly unprofessional. She’s completely wrong.

[–]juicysox0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Despite the fact that this is an anti feminist sub, a lot of you are siding with her.

I get it, they’re just tits and it is her body but it’s still extremely unprofessional and indecent, especially when she’s working in a place full of children.

A brief summary of this situation was that this woman, who’s a middle school teacher, sent a topless picture of herself to her bf, which then got leaked. Yes, that boyfriend of hers is a dick, and should get pressed charges. As much as I want drag him to hell for that, her adult ass should have known better.

This women is a teacher at a middle school. She’s working with children. Yes yes, I understand that it’s her titties and she should post whatever she likes but for fuck’s sake she a teacher. Like, would it not be weird seeing a picture of your own teacher’s tits? This women should have been more careful, especially because of the fact that she’s working with children here! Unfortunately, students did see her titty pic, which sucks, but that’s giving green lights to children posting pictures of themselves like that as well. That’s why they fired her. She’s a bad influence to children. She’s completely wrong when she says that a man won’t get fired. Men will absolutely get fired as well. I used this example a 100 times here and I will say it again. If you’re trying to get a job at a place that’s very professional, do you think your interviews will accept you if they find an indecent picture of yourself topless, online? Regardless if you’re a female or not? She’s completely wrong. A male will also get fired if they post something indecent like that. Especially if they work at a school full of children. I can’t imagine my own male teacher taking a shirtless selfie. If you can, then that’s a problem. How can anyone be so blind?

[–]Lord_Drezz-1 points0 points  (17 children) | Copy

i mean shes not wrong though technically

[–]zero5hole2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Technically?

[–]juicysox1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy

The reason women aren’t allowed to expose themselves topless is because we have titties. Titties are private parts. Do you know why private parts are private? Private parts derives sexual pleasure, that’s how mating works. Like animals, a human’s specific feature such as the genitalia, subconsciously attracts the other by triggering their hormones. Their private parts tells us that one is capable of producing and caring for that child. That’s why we wear clothes, it’s to cover our selves and to show that we are not open to sexual activity. A woman’s breasts subconsciously turns on a man, because it tells their hormones that we are able to provide enough nutrition to care for a child when we make a baby. Men don’t have titties. Looking at a man’s nipple does not turn on a women. That’s why it is, and should be unacceptable for a women to expose her tits in public. It’s not gender discrimination, it’s human nature. She’s a fool, who is taking advantage of feminism for a get out of jail free card.

[–]der-dunkle2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

That argument could also come from a feminist - just with slightly different arguments

"OMG - she shows tits - men could like that - she is objectifying herself for men!"

Yes, nice breasts might turn men on. So what? As long as a woman does not complain then that a man likes it, I do not see a problem.

[–]ArizonaBlood1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

But some people get sexual pleasure from feet so

[–]SlickShadyyy0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy

Men can be aroused by covered breasts as well. If you were to actually take this argument to it's logical conclusion things like burkas would be necessary. Additionally this assumes that it's incumbent on people to dress such that they don't arouse anyone, which seems very stupid if you hold and liberal values whatsoever, and furthermore the issue was never even about public exposure in the first place unless she was topless in public when the photo was taken

[–]pseudonympholepsy1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

People are turned on by clothing... then we have all the really weird fetishes...

[–]SlickShadyyy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

yeah so maybe trying to prohibit behavior which could potentially arouse someone dont make so much sense

[–]juicysox1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy

Yes. You are absolutely right, men can be aroused by covered breasts. It wouldn’t be possible to dress in a way where we don’t arouse anyone. However, a bare chest will get more attention and sexualized than a covered one. Which is specifically why we keep them covered because exposing our bare chest is equivalent to exposing our genitals. Not only will perverted men start jerking off to us, but it is a way of saying that we are open to sexual activity. We’re not animals, nor are we in our cavemen years anymore. It’s the 21st century. We wear clothes because it is a way of saying that we do not want people to see our private parts. It is a way of saying that we do not want to engage in sexual activity.

[–]SlickShadyyy0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

> but it is a way of saying that we are open to sexual activity

it absolutely is not, that's pretty close to rape aplogism tbh

> We wear clothes because it is a way of saying that we do not want people to see our private parts.

This doesn't establish why people who are comfortable with others seeing their private parts should be forced to adhere to the same conventions

> It is a way of saying that we do not want to engage in sexual activity.

again, just completely wrong. most sexual activity begins with clothes on believe it or not

[–]juicysox1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

So, are you personally comfortable with walking down the street completely naked, if you weren’t pressed charges for public nudity?

[–]SlickShadyyy0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

no, but how I personally conduct myself is completely irrelevant

[–]juicysox1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

Female or not, if someone were to try and get a job at a professional place, you will not get the job if an interviewer finds a picture of you topless on google. The women on this post was a teacher at a middle school. Some student found it and it got leaked. Imagine finding a picture of your own teacher topless, whether it’s a male or female. It’s weird and unprofessional.

[–]SlickShadyyy0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

It's unprofessional to be naked on your own time? You understand this mentality is literally the most cancerous imaginable neo-puritan bullshit, right?

[–]juicysox2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

It’s unprofessional and indecent to take a picture of yourself naked, then post it online.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter