For me, it's the claim that women become empowered by behaving like men. That is, by being promiscuous, by having a single-track focus on a highly competitive career, by treating sex as purely or primarily about physical pleasure, by disregarding any displays of aesthetic beauty (fashion, makeup), and so on.

This isn't empowering. Feminism is instructing women to behave according to a stereotype about how men behave. But the truth is, men aren't following this script. Most men look within themselves and try to discover what interests them personally and then they pursue those interests, whatever they are, regardless of what anyone else does or thinks. This takes effort, contemplation, self-confidence, and usually a lot of trial and error.

Following a feminist formula for what it means or looks like to be empowered is the opposite of what men do. Instead of thinking for yourself and discovering what you enjoy and pursuing that, feminism tells women to parrot a pre-packaged script that's based on dumb stereotypes about men. And we know it's fake too, men can tell whether a woman has a genuinely strong constitution or whether she's just puffing out her feathers.

I think that, instead, women should be encouraged to behave as individuals. Special attention should probably be paid to the fact that women seem more concerned with fitting in and following social expectations. So they're more vulnerable to these kinds of feminist influences about "how" they "should" behave in order to be "empowered".

And it may also be the case that most women who look deep within themselves will realize not a desire to be the next Margaret Thatcher or Atwood, but instead to become a caring and competent mother who perhaps runs a part-time business on the side, or who does charity, or is involved in some hobby. And these preferences shouldn't be stigmatized, which they are, by implication that they're not included under the ambit of the Approved Feminist Conception of "empowerment."