Male or Female Genital Cutting: Why 'Health Benefits' Are Morally Irrelevant

antifeminist3 · 2021-03-04T21:30:57+00:00

Even the argument that it promotes health is flawed, because penile cancer is almost unheard of at age 18. So let the male grow up and when he is 18 he can decide via informed consent if he wishes it. It is medically unnecessary to do it at birth. Again, it is others deciding what to do with the male's body. Someone else controlling a male's body in an unnecessary way; it unnecessarily violates bodily autonomy.

Yoshiezibz · 2021-03-04T23:05:11+00:00

I fucking hate the "benefit" people claim that it's cleaner. What the fuck. I sometimes get sock fluff in-between my toes, should I cut the webbing of my toes so it will be cleaner.

Also, my ear lobes get a little oily, I will take them off to keep it clean.

TAPriceCTR · 2021-03-05T10:54:31+00:00

Let's give our daughters double mastectomies at birth JUST IN CASE they might get breast cancer.

YesterdayFit123 · 2021-03-09T13:03:22+00:00

commenting for later!

Title	Male or Female Genital Cutting: Why 'Health Benefits' Are Morally Irrelevant
Author	je97
Upvotes	49
Comments	4
Date	March 4, 2021 3:15 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lxmqnh/male_or_female_genital_cutting_why_health/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/male-or-female-genital-cutting-why-health-benefits.833167 https://theredarchive.com/post/833167

Comments