A comment that I made to another post about the MRM vs Men's Liberation:

The men's rights movement was an inevitable and required pushback against feminism. No ideology should be allowed to run unchecked.

Think Nazi Germany and North Korea.

A pushback is necessary to keep them from having absolute power or disaster ensues.

From a feminists perspective, feminism was the inevitable and required pushback to the "patriarchy" (I despise that term btw).

Feminism wants to quash the patriarchy. I think that is pretty standard methodology for all feminism. Even though the patriarchy doesn't exist but that's besides the point.

Did they expect that society would just give into all their demands without question?

That's where the MRM comes into play.

Men's Liberation lol. This is a feminist construct to make it look like feminism is good for men. It isn't.

Feminism isn't going to "liberate" men.

Look at what feminism has done to due process and innocent until proven guilty. Two of the pillars of modern democracy and the legal system.

No. There is a response to every ideology. There has to be. And the MRM is the required response. Not Men's Liberation.

**And I'm going to listen to the one that the ideology in question doesn't want you to hear. Not the one that it does. Because I'm smarter than that.