I don't think it's fair to call this the position of Psychology Today: it's a blog that one person has on Psychology Today. Conflating them strikes me as analogous to conflating opinion pieces with news pieces in a newspaper or on TV news.
That's fine, but I don't see any justification for accusing this institution of endorsing the content of one member's blog unless and until the institution qua institution comes out somewhere and says it does.
[–]mmpro55 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]NotherThrowaway2842 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't think it's fair to call this the position of Psychology Today: it's a blog that one person has on Psychology Today. Conflating them strikes me as analogous to conflating opinion pieces with news pieces in a newspaper or on TV news.
[–]damonkutt[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]NotherThrowaway2841 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
That's fine, but I don't see any justification for accusing this institution of endorsing the content of one member's blog unless and until the institution qua institution comes out somewhere and says it does.
Right?
[–]damonkutt[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vaultdweller1001V 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link