I like how they are freaking out. The law says that there cannot be more than 60% of just one gender being appointed. So why are they surprised when they appointed 69% women?
Isn’t the argument for feminism equal representation and treatment? Shouldn’t they be applauding the fine for keeping up with that standard? After all, the road goes both ways.
[–]Pillbug531 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I like how they are freaking out. The law says that there cannot be more than 60% of just one gender being appointed. So why are they surprised when they appointed 69% women?
Isn’t the argument for feminism equal representation and treatment? Shouldn’t they be applauding the fine for keeping up with that standard? After all, the road goes both ways.
[–]powderST2013 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]billfitz24 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Verologist[S] 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mythandros[M] -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Verologist[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mythandros[M] -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Verologist[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mythandros[M] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Werd616 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Apollo114892 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]d_nijmegen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link