Man is acquitted twice of sexual assault. These are lengthy court cases where evidence is examined carefully with due diligence. This is how Channel 9 News Australia reports it. HonestAsk2 January 30, 2020 105 upvotes /r/MensRights https://streamable.com/ek5ri
[+]HonestAsk21 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
He was acquitted previously. So what's their point?
[–]Home--Builder 5 points6 points7 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]HonestAsk21 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
He was acquitted, which means didn't do it. So why mention it?
The news was practically implying he is guilty.
[–]TheStumblingWolf 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Madskil321 -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]HonestAsk21 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
"prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the man is guilty"
ok.
[–]Madskil321 -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]HonestAsk21 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
https://www.cdpp.gov.au/prosecution-process/commonly-used-terms
[–]Madskil321 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Home--Builder -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]2Manadeal2btw 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]daddymooch 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link