A little old, but worth seeing- the NYT published this Op-Ed: Consider firing your male broker. The article suggests that women are better investors than men because of a statistical 1.8% difference

A study by the Warwick Business School concluded that women outperformed men at investing by 1.8 percent.

The entire article is a work of sexism and hypocrisy. Everything feminists oppose in gender stereotypes, you see written in here. The comments are absolutely cancerous, defending the article and the "data" behind it. Of course, the hypocrisy here is how feminists are sharply critical of any data that contradict their own narrative, such as men working longer hours (wage gap), boys achievement gap in education, domestic violence, etc...for these data sets, feminists use theory and anecdote to supplement evidence, yet when a very small and questionable piece of data is found that supports male inferiority, they suggest applying it broadly and generally.