Crosspost "If you drink so much liquor that you can't give consent that is your fault, and it shouldn't be considered rape." from /r/unpopularopinion:
Now I get it if someone actually just roofied you ( or spiked your drink ) that's fucked up, or if some how you didn't even know what the side effects where to drinking but if you know that after 7 Budweiser beers you can not handle yourself then why is it someone else's fault that you didn't stop drinking and they were trying to hook up? Why is someone blamed for your incompetence if they do?
Edit: I already personally changed my mind about this opinion, but please if you think the same, comment. If you think other wise, comment to people who think the this opinion is correct and have a conversation. Please.
Posted by Someone_119 | 5 May 2019 |
Link
[–]XavierMalory 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]XavierMalory 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtowolf 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Sir_Sux_Alot1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I dont know guys, reading that feels wrong to me. there are alot of nuances to this situation. Are they in a physical relationship already? Did they meet at the party?
I've had drunk sex before and I think that there is still a level of consent but it's hard to gauge exactly how drunk someone is and because its hard to judge people should err on the side of caution unless they are in a committed physical relationship which I believe gives implied consent.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link