Legit curious here.

The idea in the mainstream, Universities, and Feminism is that men are privileged in many ways women are not, even though what they call "male privilege" only typically applies to a certain top percentage of men and not all, or even most.

I've noticed there exists this deep taboo idea that you cannot openly mention or discuss attractive female privilege of being unconditionally being taken care of and supported in the way the most privileged cases of women are. Even though women can indeed handle many of the responsibilities men can, but there are some who just want the carefree life provided to them by a high status "privileged" males, and rely entirely on their beauty to do so. Feminists talk about unreasonable beauty expectations, but even they look at it from a patriarchal perspective and pretty much shy away from talking about how privileged those women are whom go along with the status quo and marry a rich man. Women and men alike inherently already know that an attractive woman is hella privileged and very powerful. Billions of dollars a year is spent on cosmetics for this very reason.

I often hear about how rich and successful men didn't really "earn what they got" through privilege and whatnot, and that they should pay back to society. Meanwhile their often wives and girlfriends, and even daughters in the background just glide off the coattails of his success are the most privileged and coddled people in the world and literally no one says a thing about it when it could explain alot of the issues.

The WIFE of a CEO is arguably more privileged than than the CEO. In the meantime I hear what women did before the 60's was all unpaid labor, but they don't seem comprehend that those women were being paid by being taken care of and provided for in ways men never were and still aren't. It's why the homeless population is predominately male, and that there are less social support programs and shelters for men.

If equal rights were theoretically a court case with a judge and jury, then anything concerning woman being taken care of and provided for would practically be inadmisable evidence. It's off the table and unusable, even though its it's the smoking gun, the dead body, and witnesses combined it still cant be used or talked about

TL:DR

I've thought about this for years now and haven't quite come up on any theories or ideas on why this is - on why attractive women, and corresponding privilege, are immune and completely off limits to any sort of discussion, even Feminists don't really touch it.

​