How much does a man have to earn a year to be considered? - LSA

xNOM · 2019-02-15T12:49:53+00:00

Given their attitudes, I don't think qualifying for these gold-diggers would be a good thing lol

2019-02-15T12:15:06+00:00

50k a year is average in the usa.

1LegendaryWombat · 2019-02-15T14:27:31+00:00

I live on about 6-8 thousand dollars a year, if some woman is expecting me to apparently spend somewhere between 69-90 thousand dollars on her, shes got another thing coming.

GimmeYourGoldz · 2019-02-15T14:32:11+00:00

This is just a bunch of delusional women that will probably never get someone that is making 75k or more a year.

If you notice they are all saying I will not settle for anything less than $$$, not my partner is making $$$.

Demonspawn · 2019-02-15T17:13:02+00:00

Beyond these women's comments, let's throw out some real numbers:

A single mother of two can qualify for $37k cash equivalent in government support. Add 10k/yr for the man to have his own spending money and the taxes on top of all of that (because the $37k/yr is not taxed) and we end up with around $60k/yr.

What percentage of earners make $60k/yr or more? It's 1/3rd. That means women have used government to replace 2/3rds of all men as marriage material. It's actually a better deal for the woman and her children to not be married to the father unless he is the top 3rd of all incomes in the USA.

grandmasbroach · 2019-02-15T19:29:27+00:00

There you have it guys! Hundreds upon hundreds of comments all saying pretty much the same thing. Women all say they need a man to make at LEAST 100k a year. No talk of what they'd bring to the relationship. They are acting like men are accessories and slaves to them. 99% of the comments say they won't even consider a man who makes less than 100k as a longterm partner. But, guys are the shallow ones because we don't think being morbidly obese is attractive...?

Women aren't even seeing the problem they're making here. Feminists are always pushjng for more women in college. Now, men are the minority by a full 20%.

What do you think that will do to a males earning potential in life? Obviously, it will decrease on average. So, we end up with a society of women who won't even consider a man who isn't in the top 5% or so in terms of finances, and is then further compounded by the fact women simply won't find men attra give that they out earn. Then, you have an entire generation of women who have almost nothing to offer in a relationship, they can't cook, clean, keep a house, etc. But, expect you to fill your traditional gender role to the letter and bring home that bacon! After all, she married the rich guy so she could just hire someone to do all that yucky stuff for her.

Anyways, women don't seem to understand the situation they are creating for themselves by propping up women, and putting down men. They are creating a generation of men who don't earn as much money through things like gendered scholarships and grants. Women won't find them attractive, and will all want the same 5-10% of men on the top of the socioeconomic ladder. Then what happens, is that small group of men have so many women available it makes no sense to settle with just one. Basically, women are creating a system where they ensure they are above men financially, and then simultaneously don't understand where all the "good" men went. If you haven't figured it out yet, good just means, up to my strict standards. It's simple logic. If women are attracted to powerful men. Then taking every bit of power and wealth possible from them is going to mean there will be less in your options of possible suitors.

This does even get into looks at all. Many women also won't consider dating a man under five foot ten inches. So, you have about 90% of women, chasing the top 1% of men, all because sex and the city told them it would work out this way. Then, are surprised when they're alone at 50 with no kids and a dozen cats. If you'll only consider dating the top ten percent of men financially, and then couple that with the criteria of being taller than average, and of approximately the same age. They have effectively narrowed their dating pool to fractions of a percent of the population. Again, then wonder why they're alone later in life, and blame it all in men, or the lack of "good" ones.

Aaod · 2019-02-15T15:58:07+00:00

Places like that do not represent reality. I personally prefer the famous okcupid study if I want to point something like this out since it has less of a bias.

ThatsReallyGr8 · 2019-02-16T00:12:27+00:00

LSA ??? What does that stand for?

Title	How much does a man have to earn a year to be considered? - LSA
Author	bigkyrososa
Upvotes	25
Comments	27
Date	February 15, 2019 11:47 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aqvsfc/how_much_does_a_man_have_to_earn_a_year_to_be/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/how-much-does-a-man-have-to-earn-a-year-to-be.883743 https://theredarchive.com/post/883743

Comments