This is an excellent post, talking about how alpha males elicit childishness in women.

(Beta males do not elicit this childishness, are therefore oblivious to it, and therefore find the concept of female childishness to be inaccurate/offensive.)

This was an interesting question, and I wonder how you guys respond to it:

What if, as an alpha, the idea of an adult partner that perpetually exists in a childlike state is absolutely revolting? What if the alpha demands the woman think as an adult? What if the alpha demands a partner that works to improve her own thought processes? What if the alpha punishes the woman when she fails to meet a standard of a true partner in this way? When she acts this way, she is severely punished until she is forced to examine this behavior introspectively. Then the behavior is identified to the alpha and the female, and it is corrected. A way forward is prescribed, and agreed upon. Always of course, with follow through. When it happens again, the moment this distinction was made is referred to.

What I have described is much the way you would teach a child that behavior is/is not acceptable. One teaches children how to treat people, you can teach an adult how to treat yourself. And if she won't comply? Leave her ass and find another. She'll agree, or the alpha will find someone who will.

What does TRP say if a spoiled child as a life partner is not appealing? Are those alphas destined to just live with plates forever? Or does TRP have ideas for this contingent?