Thoughts on this article

bufedad · 2018-08-06T15:04:13+00:00

It's the New York Times. They just hired an absolute bigot against whites and men.

So, of course their answer to the problems of boys is masculinity, not the fact that they are being left behind in education. Not the fact that they are being discriminated against left and right. Not the fact that someone bigoted against them can still be employed, but they can be fired for speaking out against the bigotry they face, no... it's masculinity.

grasshopa · 2018-08-06T15:23:46+00:00

The problem is boys/men have rightly recognized that society has given up on them, yet still expects them to give their all back to society, even if they can't adequately vocalize their frustrations.

Most people, put in this situation, will simply disengage, and we see that behavior with the "fail to launch" crowd. Some get angry about it, but they don't really know what they're angry about ( witness the toxic and angry mgtow/PUA/Redpill subs ).

Some rare few will take it to the extreme, and those end up being the tragic cases. Tragic because it's entirely preventable; if we were to treat people as people, instead of qualifying their treatment based on their gender, most of these situations would have been avoided before they spiraled out of control. Even if we started today, right this moment, we'd still have at least a decade or so of violence as we have people out there that have been so alienated and ostracized that without directed and focused help they're going to pop.

zphyer · 2018-08-06T15:31:28+00:00

If she orders for me that's fine but then she's paying.

antifeminist435 · 2018-08-07T04:36:37+00:00

Feminists are hypocritical. When some right-wing people say we need to talk about terrorist attacks by islamic extremists, feminists say that is islamophobic and prejudiced against muslims. In other words, implying that terrorist attacks have a significant connection to extremist forms of islam is unreasonable, but connecting violence to only men is acceptable (and thereby ignoring female perpetrated domestic violence, ignoring most children in USA and killed by mothers, 25% of partner-murder is by women). This only shows their female bias because they apply their 'non-discimination' selectively

goodmod · 2018-08-06T15:29:48+00:00

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible.

If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable.

So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.

When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.

hackableyou · 2018-08-06T15:25:33+00:00

He makes some good points. Why would you say he is biased?

Title	Thoughts on this article
Author	zphyer
Upvotes	4
Comments	13
Date	August 6, 2018 2:55 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/951yg8/thoughts_on_this_article/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/thoughts-on-this-article.896665 https://theredarchive.com/post/896665

Comments