~ archived since 2018 ~

Imagine an International Men On Strike day

slacktivist0 · 2018-07-06T00:23:37+00:00

Imagine a day on which all men refuse to help women. If your job requires you to then call in sick and don't help them. Why should the feminists bother...

slacktivist0

July 6, 2018

4 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Imagine an International Men On Strike day
Author	slacktivist0
Upvotes	4
Comments	21
Date	July 6, 2018 12:23 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8wfl7w/imagine_an_international_men_on_strike_day/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/imagine-an-international-men-on-strike-day.898442 https://theredarchive.com/post/898442

Comments

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You make statements of fact that you cannot know. Because any excuse for a woman is a good one.

I don't care if every woman claims to be sweet and sane. Politically they trample on the rights of men. Since we can't seem to organize politically, likely because some of you just can't see female nature until it bites you - you cling to the illusion of sugar and spice and everything nice like a security blanket, this is something we can do to reveal women as self interested agents.

Practically speaking, 80 out of every 100 people could not give a fuck about ideology at all except insofar as it feeds their stomach or their genitals. A day of men on strike would have the most impact on them. They wouldn't be able to take male slavery for granted. I've seen it work. Women can detect when you don't give a fuck about them within minutes. They don't like it. They sometimes start behaving like the stereotypes: becoming more encouraging, less harsh.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]-manatease 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Iansloth13 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

An international women on strike day came and went and no one cared.

An international men on strike day would end civilization as we know it, and we would likely never fully recover as a species.

Major cities have an average of 76 fires that require fire department (95% male) to deal with. This means that every major city would have (on average) 72 fires that would rage out of control.

These fires would take out power distribution centers, communications centers, supermarkets.

Those surviving in cities would be without food, water, shelter, power, or any means of communication.

The rural parts of the world would deal with fires, but it's far less devastating as people aren't packed in so densely.

The rural parts of the world would be without cell service (remember those communications centers that were destroyed), internet service (again, those communications centers that were destroyed), power (those power distribution centers), oil drilling would continue, but ships would be unable to coordinate their deliveries. Refineries would be without power (gasoline production) and in less than two weeks, the world is effectively out of gasoline/diesel. There would be pockets of reserves, but no method of coordinating it's distribution or release.

The world (as we know it) would end if men took off for an entire day as a gender.

If women took off for an entire day as a gender, hundreds, maybe thousands would die, and many more would be inconvenienced.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All I'm really shooting for is critical mass. Women go years never having to ask a man for the help men slavishly give. It only takes each individual woman having to, for the first time in their overly entitled lives, ask a man for help they need.

Then to hear a "no"? The feeling I get from them when I've done this is panic. Attractive or ugly they start fidgeting, trying really hard to strike up conversation or scrambling to do some menial task I didn't need their help with so they can ask for the help they need.

I once sold stereo equipment to an Aussie blonde. She was full of feminism. I was probably purple pill at the time. Do you know how pissed she was to have to ask for my help lifting the subwoofer? She actually asked with a snide "you are stronger than me..." True but this does not imply I must help her. She's no bottleneck for the species.

A woman like that may not give two fucks about rights. But she wanted that stereo equipment and couldn't get it without asking for my help. Just the asking was a reminder: but for men you would be lunch for the nearest pack of wolves.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]designplays 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Iansloth13 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]designplays 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Iansloth13 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link