Another bungled "false" rape case? 2 men acquitted after week long trial where they present no evidence. Prosecution's evidence too weak to convict.

The thing that really gets me is.

"Parent’s DNA wasn’t found anywhere on the woman, Scholke added, telling the jury the woman’s word alone was not enough to convict either man."

http://archive.is/gNEUR

How does that go to trial? The jury seemed to have more sense than the prosecutors.