Student Expelled for Sexual Assault Had Evidence His Accuser Was Dating the Cop Who Investigated the Case

nascarracer99316 · 2018-02-03T00:07:05+00:00

The University of Cincinnati expelled a student, Tyler Gischel, after he had sex with a student who claimed she was incapacitated at the time. Gischel claims investigators ignored two critical aspects of his defense: that his accuser wasn't as drunk as she claimed, and that she might have been romantically involved with William Richey, the university police detective who handled the case.

Conflict of interest???

the accuser, Jennifer Schoewe

Rare occasion where the female accuser is named. I like it.

Friends of the accuser, Jennifer Schoewe, even claimed she exchanged messages with the detective in which they proclaimed their love for each other. But Richey deleted his texts before officials could see them, and Schoewe refused to unlock her phone.

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The information presented by Gischel casts significant doubt on the allegation against him, and it makes a strong case that the university violated his due process rights. The police detective's conduct seems utterly reprehensible—so bad, in fact, that the judge is allowing Gischel to sue the officer in both his official and personal capacities. (Dlott dismissed the personal claims against other college officials but some of the official-capacity claims against them will also proceed.)

Umm wow. That is bad if he is allowed to sue the cop twice.

The lawsuit describes Schoewe as behaving in a manner that indicated sexual interest in Gischel: She both kissed him and grabbed his crotch.

Yet he was the only one punished.

Gischel informed the friend via text that Schoewe was either unwilling or unable to recall where she lived, and wanted to go home with him. Later, at Gischel's apartment, Schoewe "expressly consented to having intercourse," according to Gischel.

Sometime over the course of the next two days, Schoewe spoke with her boyfriend and mother about what happened.

So she waited 2 days 2 days to claim rape. WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She also cheated on her boyfriend and yet nobody is up in arms about this.

Her mother then called the University of Cincinnati Police Department and told Richey she was worried her daughter had been raped (a situation reminiscent of the infamous Drew Sterrett Title IX dispute, in which a mother read her daughter's diary and pressured her to file a sexual misconduct complaint). Schoewe subsequently reported the incident to the campus's Title IX office, and pursued criminal charges.

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Richey handled the university's investigation. Concerns that Richey and Schoewe were somehow involved grew serious enough that the university conducted an internal investigation. Schoewe had posted a picture of herself on social media with the caption "my detective loves me," and her friends allegedly read damning text messages. Richey also gifted Schoewe a pendant to give her strength while she testified before the grand jury.

Oh yes this detective is completely unbiased.

The court ordered Richey to make the text messages available, but he had already deleted them. Schoewe had the text messages, but she refused to unlock her phone for the authorities, and so the criminal charges against Gischel were dismissed.

Too little too late. You ruined his life.

The Title IX hearing was another matter. Gischel was denied the opportunity to directly cross-examine Schoewe; instead, he was told to submit questions to administrators who would pose these questions to Schoewe at the hearing. Gischel submitted 63 questions, but officials declined to ask Schoewe two of the most important ones: whether she had a romantic relationship with Richey and whether she had actually been incapacitated on the night in question. (Schoewe had claimed that she believed her incapacitation stemmed from the fact that she had been drugged, but no drugs were found in her system.)

On March 28, 2016, Gischel was found responsible for sexual misconduct and expelled from the university.

But the women who lied about everything is not punished in anyway.

Southern District of Ohio Judge Susan Dlott

His lawsuit makes several noteworthy claims. He argues that the investigation reflects a gender bias against males, for instance, because the investigators did not care that Schoewe had kissed and grabbed him in a manner possibly inconsistent with Title IX. Dlott dismissed this aspect of the lawsuit because Gischel never made an issue of it—he did not file a Title IX complaint against Schoewe.

Why would he. Nobody would believe him anyways and the court system is biased in favor of women. Even if he did my bet is that they would dismiss the claims anyways.

This young man had a strong case to make that he wasn't guilty and that the investigation was prejudiced against him. He was denied the opportunity to make this case two years ago, and now the court has no choice but to relitigate the matter under fairer circumstances.

suuujuuus · 2018-02-03T08:07:08+00:00

I feel the urge to puke, holy moly

Bestoftherest222 · 2018-02-03T23:30:31+00:00

The only way shit like this will stop is when these boys/men pursue civil justice against everyone involved. Once the pockets have been drained than these agencies, schools and officials will start to make real policy to stop such bullshit.

chubbyronin · 2018-02-04T00:02:26+00:00

The lawsuit describes Schoewe as behaving in a manner that indicated sexual interest in Gischel: She both kissed him and grabbed his crotch.

I guess someone should have told him that sexual assault is not consent.

Title	Student Expelled for Sexual Assault Had Evidence His Accuser Was Dating the Cop Who Investigated the Case
Author	nascarracer99316
Upvotes	144
Comments	5
Date	February 2, 2018 11:50 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PussyPass
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PussyPass/comments/7uvodd/student_expelled_for_sexual_assault_had_evidence/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPass/student-expelled-for-sexual-assault-had-evidence.906606 https://theredarchive.com/post/906606

Comments