TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Indian High Court: Woman has right to live in matrimonial home even if dad-in-law owns it

perplexedm

October 22, 2017
25 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/hc-in-laws-may-own-it-but-wife-can-live-in-shared-homeshared-home-wifes-even-if-dad-in-law-owns-it-hc/articleshow/61167814.cms
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Indian High Court: Woman has right to live in matrimonial home even if dad-in-law owns it
Author

perplexedm

Upvotes 25
Comments 7
Date October 22, 2017 11:38 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/77zqkk/indian_high_court_woman_has_right_to_live_in/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/indian-high-court-woman-has-right-to-live-in.912535
https://theredarchive.com/post/912535
Top posts by perplexedm

Women upset because they are temporarily banned from FaceBook for calling men 'scum'.

3661 upvotes
December 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

If you say “mansplaining” to me in a conversation you will lose all credibility with me and I will 100% call you out on it.

3442 upvotes
March 17, 2019
/r/MensRights

Being “creepy” is an inevitable part of young men learning to speak to women they’re interested in. Young men shouldn’t allow women who’ve never had to be the pursuer shame them for trying and not being perfect at it on their first tries.

2879 upvotes
January 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

The other side of 'toxic masculinity' in California shooting

2627 upvotes
November 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Geoffrey Rush wins $1.9m payout on #MeToo defamation case

2465 upvotes
July 6, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male Feminist commits suicide after Feminist falsely accuses him during Women's March

2430 upvotes
January 2, 2019
/r/MensRights

The fact that men’s issues are largely (or entirely) ignored by the body positivity movement shows it’s mainly about overweight women wanting to be victims

2102 upvotes
December 7, 2019
/r/MensRights

If Kevin Hart is ostracized into not hosting the Oscars, Amy Schumer, a self-proclaimed rapist should not be able to co-host either.

1979 upvotes
February 25, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]perplexedm[S] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A new facet of law which can be abused by Indian women

[–]Imnotmrabut 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

And all the costs of fighting to show misuse of law will fall upon the many men who can't afford the legal costs.

So yet again we see that India is, and for many decades has been, a Matriarchal Society. All too often single incidents of negative treatment of women have been used to promote Apex Fallacy and National Misandry.

[–]perplexedm[S] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Courts already ruled that divorcing women have rights to even ancestral property of husbands in India. So, there it goes.

In current case, court is only referring to matrimonial home, why herself and her own home does not have any responsibility is a question which need answer.

Do his parents have rights to decide on their own property ? She is married to husband not his parents.

[–]perplexedm[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Highlights

  • The complainant had appealed in the high court saying she was thrown out of her matrimonial home

  • The court said a woman gets the right to live in her matrimonial home or a shared household irrespective of whether it belongs to or is owned by her husband.

Mumbai: The Bombay high court has held that a woman gets the right to live in her matrimonial home or a shared household irrespective of whether it belongs to or is owned by her husband.

It relied on the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act to direct a man not to dispossess his wife until the Family Court decides on his plea— to declare their marriage a nullity as she was not divorced from the first husband or to grant him a divorce. The husband claimed she had barged into his father's Mulund home.

After its initial status quo order in September 2014 and after it directed the husband not to dispossess her, the Family Court vacated it in May 2017, saying the Mulund flat exclusively belongs to the father-in-law and the son stays separately in Navi Mumbai.

It also said that since there is nothing to prove the son has any interest or title in the property along with his father, the wife has no right to claim any relief in respect of the property.

The wife appealed in the HC, saying she was thrown out of her matrimonial home. Her advocate Rajesh Dharap argued that the flat may be in the name of the father-in-law, but as it is her matrimonial home, she is entitled to reside there and cannot be dispossessed or restrained from entering it. The husband's advocate said it is a settled position in law that the wife can have a right of residence only in the property owned or possessed by her husband and not his relatives.

Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi on October 12 noted that the Domestic Violence Act has been enacted to secure the right of a woman to reside in her matrimonial or shared household irrespective of whether she has any right, title or interest in it. The judge said till the dispute started, both resided in the Mulund flat and, therefore, as they have lived together as a couple in a domestic relationship, it becomes her shared household under the Act and she gets the right to reside in it. "In such a situation, whether the said flat belongs to or is owned by the respondent husband, is totally irrelevant," she added.

The judge said there was nothing to show the husband had actually shifted his residence to Navi Mumbai and in his application for anticipatory bail, the flat in Mulund had been shown as his address. "This court cannot fall victim to the tricks or ploys played by the respondent husband in such cases," she added.

The judge said the Family Court "has not considered all these aspects, especially the very clear provisions of the DV Act, and straightaway vacated the status quo order..." "The impugned order, therefore, passed by the Family Court cannot be called as just, legal and correct. Hence it needs to be set aside," said Justice Phansalkar-Joshi. Restoring the Family Court's status quo order, she directed it to decide the husband's plea within six months.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

India us a very odd place.

[–]BlueOrange22 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

India is one of the worst places in the world for discrimination of men and radical feminism. It's still legal to rape men, because of feminist activism:

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/Activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms

[–]perplexedm[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also a place where stupendously corrupted statistics are created.

Man and woman argued and ended up beating each other?, then it is violence against women, molesting and sexual assault automatically.

Have a civil case and want to make your case stronger in court? Say other party eve teased, sexually assaulted women in your family, without shame. I've seen even my friends doing it in miserable fashion.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter