I'll cut right to the chase, (on Imgur) I posted two images arguing nearly the exact same point. The difference? One was clearly from an anti feminists point of view, the other from somebody who was clearly pro feminist. Again, they both say nearly the same thing "Men and women are genetically different from each other". https://i.imgur.com/2yFhcKW.png Exhibit A (feminist pov) https://imgur.com/gallery/g8of9 Exhibit B (anti feminist pov) On to the responses. Just as I expected, everybody agreed with the feminist in exhibit A, but were strongly against the anti feminist in exhibit B.
Here's the best comparison I can give. On exhibit A (pro feminist) a user replied with "this just in snowflakes offended by biology, next on ten o'clock news" But on exhibit B (anti feminist) a user replied with "Heh, purposeful creation. That's cute"
There are plenty more comparisons you could make between the posts, and they almost always directly contradict each other. So what's the point of all this? Think about it for a moment, these are both from the same group. How can this happen? I still don't know the answer to that, because it makes no sense no matter which way you look at it.
[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anonymous--Rex 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link