I know that I am "preaching to the converted". I just want some opinions on my writing style.

As some of us are aware, in USA 2017 there is discrimination against men. Male offenders are more likely to be arrested, being arrested they are more likely to be convicted, being convicted, they get 63% longer sentences for the same crime then female offenders. Men are discriminated in Divorce cases. Male victims of Domestic Violence are arrested more frequently then helped. Male bashing is widely accepted in the Mainstream Media -- including calls for the extermination of men, which are supposedly a joke. Anyone who mentions these issues risks being excluded from polite society and losing his/her job. Given that most people have little awareness of the issues men face, men are considered to be privileged oppressors.

Even though many men and some women realize that the situation is bad, few realize how much worse the situation can become if SJWs win this round of societal conflict. The victory of SJWs would bring important changes. Men accused of sex offenses would lose Presumption of Innocence, thus there would be far more false convictions. Domestic Violence against men would be much more common and even more acceptable. Male bashing and #killallmen rhetoric would be more common then now.

The most important change would be the end of Free Speech. According to "What if women ruled the world?" (Gurdian, 5/07/17), mansplaining would be penalized: "I imagine we would call it the Law of Sschhh: if a woman says sschhh to a man, he is bound by law to go home and sit down and shut up. Soon, there will be no ... #notallmen." That would be achieved within the latter of the First Amendment. The penalty against anyone who seriously complains about anti-male discrimination would be inflicted by non-government forces. They would be banned from all Social Media, and blacklisted. The SJW era is not 2017, when there were still Facebook groups, YouTube channels, subreddits, and Twitter accounts devoted to men's issues.

Men would face considerably more discrimination and domestic abuse then in 2017. In the public sphere men would be subject to much more verbal abuse including jokes about androcide like #killallmen. Men would be fired for slightest comment perceived even mildly offensive or for complaining about male bashing. Men would be subject to the rules in making which they had no part, rules which do not apply to those who made them. That is called tyranny.

The tyranny to which men would be subject would have an element of cruel game absent in many other types of tyranny. People subject to tyrannical rule at least have sympathy from humanitarians. Men in SJW world would be forbidden from mentioning that they are discriminated against, and would be pressured to reaffirm multiple times that they are the privileged oppressors. Thus, the perception of men being privileged would increase even as men suffer more discrimination. Gender feminists would have complete power over men -- including the power to coerce men into constantly apologizing for being powerful privileged oppressors.