~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]-redditardation- 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think the issue is that the rest of society finds the notion that a priest must commit to being celibate cruel and is essentially just breeding abusers.
If a person doesn't get any sexual relief their entire life they might be a lot more inclined to do something awry to fulfill the desire that has been building.
The best way to make the general public more sympathetic would be to highlight the rate of abuse of priests vs. the general populous. On first glance it seems to be on par:
http://europe.newsweek.com/priests-commit-no-more-abuse-other-males-70625?rm=eu
[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I'm sorry, I cannot support you on this issue.
Here in Australia, we're currently having our own inquiry into child abuse within the Catholic church. Local reports put the number of catholic priests who committed child abuse at higher than 7% of the total, and in some catholic orders the figure topped 20%. The revelations are utterly horrifying, worse than anyone had imagined.
The Catholic church in Australia has also used a unique legal structure, available only to the church, to shield its Australian assets from lawsuits brought by people abused as children. Instead it has offered them pitiful, token payouts of just a few thousand dollars. In my view this shows that the church views these victims with contempt and feels no remorse for what it did to them.
Australia's most senior catholic, cardinal George Pell, fled to the Vatican some years ago and has since refused to return and answer questions from the inquiry over what he knew about child abuse by priests and when he knew it. There are allegations he was directly involved in covering up these crimes and moving priests to new locations where they resumed abusing children in their new & unsuspecting community.
Aside from the question of child abuse, the Catholic church has done immense damage all around the world, particularly through denying access to birth control in developing nations that sorely need it, along with vilifying gays and opposing marriage equality.
Weighed against those extreme negatives, I see very little positive contribution that the catholic church makes to the world. On balance, I think its continued existence is strongly negative for the world, and we would be better off without it. Thankfully religious belief is declining rapidly in western countries and I look forward to seeing christian churches, including the catholic church, all but vanish from western societies in coming decades.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Did I not state that "For the bishops that have deliberately covered up the scandal, they are weak. I do not, along with many other Catholics, clergy and laymen alike, condone their actions."?
I am not asking you to support the Church, but to stand up for the men that are falsely accused because of it.
particularly through denying access to birth control in developing nations
While teaching and promoting abstinence. I will explain more in the next section.
along with vilifying gays and opposing marriage equality.
The Church does not vilify gay people. It is not a sin to have same-sex attraction, only to act on those inclinations. The Church holds that sex is sacred. Sexual intercourse between a male and female is the only natural way for our species to continue. While our species is doing okay in terms of number, that is undeniably still the purpose for sex.
Sex is unitive and must be open for procreation. It unifies the spouses, and must be open to creating new life. That is not to say you must have sex for the sole purpose of producing offspring, but the couple must acknowledge that while participating in the conjugal act, a new life may be created, and that life must be accepted.
Since the Church holds this view, we believe that anything contrary to it is sinful. Contraception falls into this category because it removes the option of sex being procreative. Same for gay sex; it cannot be open to life.
Look, I am not asking you to believe any of this. But at least respect the beliefs that I hold.
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
No, I'm sorry but I don't agree with anything that you're saying.
Any priest who chooses to break free of religious indoctrination, becomes an atheist and leaves the church will have my support in his new path in life. Anyone who remains in the church is, in my view, simply perpetuating a corrupt, harmful and obsolete ideology.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
So you will not support an innocent man of a false allegation because he wears a collar?
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I will support him receiving a legal presumption of innocence, an unbiased investigation and proper due process. I'd demand that for any man or woman.
I don't support his lifestyle. It is not a sin to be attracted to the priesthood, only to act on those inclinations. Sexual intercourse between a male and female is the only natural way for our species to continue.
Since science has proved this fact, anything contrary to it is sinful. Celibate priests fall into this category because it removes the option of procreating.
Look, I am not asking you to believe any of this. But at least respect the facts that science has revealed.
/s
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Now you are just mocking because you don't have a legitimate response. I thought that this was a place for civil discussion. I guess I was wrong.
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I gave a serious & civil response to your first reply, even though it was frankly nonsense. But then you tried to play the guilt card, so you got an appropriate response.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I did not play a guilt card? I acknowledged that this is a serious problem that the Church has failed to properly address and I tried to address the misconceptions you have about the Catholic Church.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And you seriously think that this is a "civil" response?
[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, I do. I didn't say it's what you wanted to hear, but it is a serious, honest, considered reply.
[–]devious29 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Many also claim that the Church didn't seek to resolve the issue, they just moved priests around.
This wasn't just the case for child abuse, there was the incident where terrorists planted three bombs on the high street of a large village, killing four men, two women and three children. The quartermaster and director of operations of the terrorists in that county was a Catholic priest. He was moved to a different country by the Catholic church, with complicity of the civil authorities.
There is altogether too much of a history of the hierarchy brushing things under the carpet that would be potentially damaging, often including threatening to excommunicate potential whistleblowers, to allow for enough doubt for them to benefit from. The changes over recent years (that were often forced on them) are a small step in the right direction, but little more. It's not that long ago since a diocese in America tried to get out of paying compensation to the victims of it's priests by ringfencing $55m of funding to maintain their cemeteries (whereas the budget for the Commonwealth War Graves Commission is $80m).
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I want to be clear that I am not defending those who have committed these heinous crimes. I am defending the other 95% of innocent priests that are "guilty by association"
I desire to see all people who have caused destruction in human lives, both those who perpetrated it as well as those who knowingly allowed it to happen, receive justice.
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It can't really be that 95% of the priests are innocent, though. There's everyone involved who looked the other way. The people further up the hierarchy who moved those priests around between congregations, the people who knew about that and didn't do anything... The numbers of people who materially contributed to the sexual abuse of children by members of the Catholic church adds up quickly.
On top of that, what on earth makes you think that a rate equivalent to one out of every twenty priests in ministry is rare or should ever be listed as "only"?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
4 percent have been accused, not founded guilty. And how many higher ups do you think actually knew about it going on? It wasn't like the perpetrators went around saying, "look at me! I am molesting children."
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
No, when their victims went around saying "Look at this! I am being molested!" the response was a combination of threats and moving the accused around from posting to posting. Neither of these responses are acceptable. All of those higher-ups who heard accusations and reacted in such a way as to protect the church and not the victims is guilty of helping the abuse of children spread.
Also, you've just given yourself away as not being Catholic, you fucking disgusting troll.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Excuse me? How have I given myself away as not being Catholic? How am I being a troll?
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Why would I tell you where your doctrinal fuckup occurred? It'll just make you more convincing next time.
Lol okay. Whatever.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]-redditardation- 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]devious29 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]mycroftxxx42 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link