TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-redditardation- Archive

View 8 posts and 1,316 comments by -redditardation- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,316 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have two questions? Is walking up to a girl and saying "Hi, I'd like to sleep with you." harassment? Is going up to a girl in a bar when you're single and have had a few drinks yourself and saying "Hey, I'd like to buy you a beer." harassment? They're both just short for you've been plowed in the ass in my mind and fuck you looked good with my cock up it moaning and having your legs shake (and if it isn't that for you it is that for a bunch of guys). What would make that okay then, white lies?…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 02:57 PM
1

Hypergamy, where did that come from? Now you're trying to bring another entirely unrelated point that wasn't mentioned up as some sort of deflection? If you want to argue that maybe do that on a related thread. See you say that about dick pics which is fine everyone is entitled to their opinion but this is public so who knows what your opinion would be in private. Furthermore if they were do bad then obviously that friend of mine must have a stellar cock (he does) and I guess mines not terrible …
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 02:46 PM
1

Yes it precisely is. Freedom from political consequences and govt. reprimand for expressing yourself. If the girl doesn't like you after that's fine. Hitler and Mao believed strongly in freedom of expression for worldviews that they approved of. It's those ones you don't and the ones that offend you that matter. There are types of speech that are excluded because they aren't merely expressions of thoughts but forms of defamation or immediate calls to physical violence. These tend to be defined a…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 11:16 AM
1

If that were true then insults would be harassment. Do you think the other person wanted to hear he was unattractive and be critiqued on his weight? As far as I am aware of they are not and only become that if they are repeated and the victim is pursued. I'm not saying it isn't creepy, weird or in most circumstances out of place. I was actually referring to cases where there is at least some reciprocity since those are the ones I know, I don't actually know weirdos who went up to girls and said …
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 10:34 AM
-1

How is a measured reply with literal methodical bullet points worked up. Worked up would be calling you names or something akin to that. There has been none of that. I even pointed out the exception where you might be right, thereby steelmanning your side of the argument. Why would my goal be hurt feelings? My goal is to educate you on the fact that freedom of expression is often offensive and that your personal ideas of what might upset you are not everyone else's. I'll use dick pics as another…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 10:21 AM
-3

In other words: You lost the argument but can't admit it. You have no understanding of freedom of expression as it includes the right to offend and offending isn't harassment or assault. You come up with some hypothetical scenario to refute my real world example which is entirely not the same. If I barely know the girl how would I masturbate to her? Run off into the bathroom and jerk one out? Like I wouldn't have interests that supercede some random physically attractive body. Where you might ha…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 09:35 AM
-7

No it isn't. If he can't say I jerked off to you then he doesn't have freedom of expression. Freedom of thought is the most essential freedom of expression. Telling someone that they feature in their fantasies isn't harassment, it entirely depends on the situation and people and demeanor. Furthermore saying something that upsets someone isn't harassment either. I can say for example you're a fat piece of shit. It isn't nice but it isn't harassment. Furthermore heaps of people wouldn't mind at al…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 07:16 AM
3

Who cares even if he tells them or she tells them? Thought policing is bad. If it becomes plain old harassment well then it's that but you do not own someone else's thoughts so matter what he or she'd like to do to you there they can.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 06:19 AM
3

Anyone got a link to this that isn't urban dictionary. Salon literally posted Stalin and Kim were right-wingers so link their article instead of urban dictionary.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 06:17 AM
36

We aren't after your children. So that was another lie. This slope sure is slippery.
/r/MGTOW07/07/21 01:23 PM
10

It's no surprise. Most dads care deeply about their sons because they are men and know how hard life is as a man plus how much men do suffer. When their son is in genuine pain they know to comfort him. A lot of mothers just want their son to be a hot barely legal late teen jock they would've shagged in high school and sadly as such they train them from an early age to subject themselves to painful, isolating silence in an attempt to appear strong and dominant.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 08:48 AM
1

One side isn't weaker? One side benches 300 for reps the other can't do a single pushup with proper form.
/r/PussyPass10/12/20 08:46 PM
-3

Male characters: specced into strength, tenacity and complex problem solving. Female characters: specced into lower prices at the shop, being power leveled by a male and occasional free loot drops from simps.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:38 PM
1

AWALT. Some just never say so until u catch 'em or double team 'em yourself.
/r/MGTOW02/11/18 07:53 AM
15

Shame we never got to see black pill 2pac or white pill 2pac.
/r/MGTOW15/08/18 07:01 AM
2

The New York Times was never a prestigious news outlet. They have always been a leftist rag that wished to push far-left ideology at all cost. Don't believe me? Look up Walter Duranty and read the story of how the New York Times had him publish without questioning KGB propaganda to cover up Stalin's Holodomor. Not only that he won a Pulitzer for his role in helping facilitate one of the largest genocides (8 million +/- 3 million) in human history.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 05:32 AM
8

That'd be a bit high but about 20% of the girls i know well enough to know have been double teamed (and those are the ones I know of if I obey my own rules it's probably 50%) and I know two girls that had 3+ dicks in them in the span of 6 hours (and not because they are honest swingers, whores or at a gangbang rather deceiving the men in question).
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 06:15 AM
12

Never trust a woman's count unless she has a book since 13. If you've had sexual encounters with any appreciable amount of people (which will be the case even for a decent looking man) you'll realize when you try to recall it all in 2 mins you barely get 40% compared to writing it down and recollecting every moment of your life. Their 60 is 200 on those same reasons plus this tendency to forget only gets amplified with more partners not diminshed. When you meet an honest girl and she honestly te…
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 05:41 AM
1

What are kitchen knives...
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 04:47 AM
1

Shit like this makes atheists/agnostics religous. It's either y'all f*ckers need Jesus or to roast in a fiery pit for eternity. Best red pill on moral relativism is a modern day woman talking about 'her rights'.
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 04:44 AM
1

Is this real? Anyone got a source for this? This sounds so totally deranged I cannot imagine even the NYT defending this. I mean they did shill for Stalin but this is to obvious. If this is real spread this to everyone you know.
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 04:38 AM
1

Could be chad but in his current configuration probably high tier chad lite. Nonetheless hypergamy is that bad Chad only gets about 5% matches. Gigachad gets like 15%. I'd recommend checking out some of the experiments people run with numbers it's shocking (or start doing them yourself but document stuff properly so images, full profile, text description, number of swipes, time period and matches). Usually 80% of women will think they're too good for male supermodel equivalents. This isn't my sa…
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 11:13 AM
41

They'd dump superman in a heartbeat for Tony Stark. After all billionaire, playboy superhero who literally is the most powerful man in the world beats super human with a paper pusher job nobody.
/r/MGTOW28/07/18 04:12 PM
1

That moment when someone else graces you with similarly kind words. Appreciate and take my bow (typos and all) and thank you.
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 09:26 PM
2

A big reason is they are usually too weak to do any real permanent damage (barring only the very strongest and most vicious).
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 01:55 PM
2

What application is this meant to be? Doesn't look like Tinder. Hard to believe that someone would claim to be a year celibate if they use Tinder or similar applications.
/r/MGTOW23/07/18 10:40 AM
2

Red pill is like 'waking up from the Matrix' and seeing reality for what it is. E.g.: Women are hypergamous and you'll never be someone's number one, hell Brad Pitt isn't good enough what chance do you have. Blue pill is being too weak to swallow the red pill or too blind to see and rather living the delusion. E.g.: Girls don't really care about looks or height it's all your personality, they settle down when they're 30 not because they are used up and their biological clock is running out but b…
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 07:33 AM
2

Probably true. Not that I'd pull then and there game more like 2 hours and elsewhere game. I got the the I'll break up with him now if you give me the right signals but I was just thinking that even if the way I was perceiving it were true I wouldn't wann f*ck a guy over, especially one that might like her. In the past I mightn't have shared the comraderie but these days there's definitely a bros before hoes part of my soul. I just wouldn't want to screw some guy's life over a good root or 2 wee…
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 08:19 PM
2

Yeah, that sounds kinda like free love. I tend to like mocking nu-age hippies for how up tight they are. I'm far from a 'commie' but even as the antithesis of that I can see something is 'free love'. I think it is why the movement took off. Thanks for the info.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 08:05 PM
1

Was everyone conventially good looking though or attractive or did even the less than so ones get lucky. I had parents who live through much of that and their story is similar but if you look at their friend group you're like no wonder. Everyone was a '7' and up.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 07:36 PM
1

Interesting. Now this was something I always wanted to ask someone from that era. The way I heard about it it was true free love (i.e.: incels wouldn't exist barring a few people who are truly unlucky). Was that the case or was 'free love' just a euphemism for f*ck chad and when chat leaves her depressed everyone else gets to try for a go? The whole idea of free love seemed and seems rather cool. It's partially what I mock nu-age hippies over. Then again I don't know if the oldies practiced it.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 07:16 PM
1

I think the kids part there is the strongest point of the argument. I'm sure 'gigachad' is someone's number one and even stays that way but once he has kids he's somewhere down the line. You literally cannot win even if you're 12/10. I don't think this is preached enough.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:47 PM
1

I mean if youre experience was similar to that in the 70s you must've had a wild crowd I'd assume. Or maybe AWALT holds true. I mean I don't know 'today' either since I tend to stick to max 2 years down. From what I've experienced it has gotten worse in prevalence but not in severity. I don't hear much about things that seem largely different to what my time looked like regarding people's younger siblings.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:38 PM
1

If you're an adult don't fuck kiddies obviously. I'm more talking about the people growing up. You know that first highschool love or that first time or whatever.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:29 PM
2

I think that's something that doesn't get drilled into boys enough. You can be Brad Pitt and you won't be good enough. You might as well pack it up. Of course your general 'self-protective' instinct will resist this but eventually it stays.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:28 PM
1

What decade are you in old man? To be a number one with a 14 year old was the 90s. 00s had 14 year olds having 2-5 partners.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:21 PM
2

I think near the end of the post you're on point. Most people here could get laid or find a long term relationship they just aren't willing to pay the price whatever that might be. Whereas they are willing to do anything for it. I honestly think in 'our' case it comes from experience. If you'd never been kissed you'd probably also be dying for it. I guess in a way you could call them blue pilled cucks but I think they've seen through the 'matrix' they just want to pretend just one time. I genuin…
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 06:13 PM
2

I guess they don't quite realize it but I also think their shitty experience probably isn't only women. You get sized up all the time and usually if you're doing OK dudes will tell you shit like you got a 'frame' (I think that's what PUAs and they call it) or you have arms or your not thin but your arms look like someone who lifts for real. They get none of that.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 05:52 PM
2

"did you already realize YOU are YOUR numero uno." That's some real heartwarming stuff. Appreciate it and missed it :P
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 05:48 PM
1

I'm not an incel. I found them through people bitching on this sub-Reddit and painting them as something they weren't (in my opinion). Just thought I'd share my experience and actually stick up for the dudes there. Sure they were a bit hateful but if I'd been f*cked with their cards I'd also flip the table because evidently even with my cards I can't win (and they're at least a very playable hand).
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 05:43 PM
6

You're likely right and I also felt that way writing it, even number one isn't number one. If he get's fat, or isn't a pro athelete anymore, or loses money or doesn't get into the prestige college or any number of things number one just became seven or so. Nonetheless it is a rather shocking blackpill. Like 70%+ (and in most cases 80% and in some 90%) over all fields that matter isn't enough to be number one once. Like you can actually do 'well' in the genetic lottery and still lose. The fact th…
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 05:35 PM
3

The delusion it'd need to take to image Europe being white.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 04:24 PM
3

Roastie status: ROASTED!
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 05:30 AM
1

Jokes on them. Darker maned lions tend to be the more dominant. Photos missing billy beta lion in a cage though to make it accurate.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 11:15 AM
1

I will try that. Don't know if it will work for me and part of me is skeptical because the solution is so easy but another part of me does see how it would interfere with the fight of flight response system. Will be trying it.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:48 AM
0

Your radar might be a bit off. Beyond that you seem to have completely missed the point. I do not want to change those things. I want a workable solution for them. Obviously ditching everything you did before is always an option but since I'm not a puritan I have little interest in it.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:28 AM
0

I'd like to think I won't and I think it's rather unlikely. I don't seem to see your feedback really working for me although it isn't necessarily off point. Have a good time.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:20 AM
1

I do like my feels and similar. At the same time I guess you point is good. Enjoy it in that moment tomorrow is a different more rational sober day then cut it out. But then I feel a moral obligation to be a decent human being and not just shag people. In my experience monk mode didn't help (maybe I'm not doing it properly), it didn't make it worse but it's just normal you but quite a lot more weeks between getting laid.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:18 AM
0

I mean I'm not going that far nor do I hope I'd ever end that foolish. I actually really do not see the similarity. I don't f*ck skanks... but girls who have been to varying degrees interested in you for a few years or similar do tend to break the NOPE barrier in those moments.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:14 AM
1

I'd say don't drink enough and don't mix enough. But irrelevant the point is I'm wondering if there is a way or me to continue enjoying myself without essentially being given a tilted freeway with an exit every half mile.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:03 AM
0

I guess that is fair criticism but at the same time I feel like I should be able to have fun and enjoy myself (even if that might mean 'overdoing it'; then again maybe that isn't possible). Whether its booze or other stuff. It is after all my life. I could go teetootaller and done this in the past but it just isn't 'fun'.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:01 AM
1

'Feels'. Needless engagement that you wouldn't do sober. Sober you'd just fap. But throw in some lack of sleep, a party, booze and some entertainment and you'll be silly. I know this isn't perfect but hope it conveys the situation.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 12:59 AM
5

Laughed my way through a piss. Thank you. This comment alone made the post worth it.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 12:35 AM
11

The fact that this has to happen is the problem. Their demand for quotas that are inherently discriminatory is the issue. Sure people should be free to associate with whomever they please so if someone does wish to hire the woman over the more qualified man they should be able to even though I think it would be a bad business decision. Of course they would be the first to shriek like harpies over this freedom of association. In the end if all the discrinatory laws, programs and quotas they pushe…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/18 02:11 PM
25

Justifiable homicide written all over this.
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 07:19 PM
2

Not personally familiar with what you describe there (possible translation) but it isn't too far from such ideologies. It is a uniquely metaphysical break in Western philosophy and I think it does 'Eastern philosophy' better than almost all if not all of the East. It manages to be blase in answering life's deepest question and honestly how much more rebellious could you be.
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 05:58 PM
2

Replace Evola with Stoicism and you too might find peace.
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 05:49 PM
21

Something the image seems to leave out is that: There were 12 boys There was 1 coach In other words he gave everyone an oxygen tank. They probably would've been able to keep everyone alive if they used a clever rationing/sharing system but he isn't just a guy who can't count or check his gauge. If you're there to rescue people you probably would make the same mistake.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 03:22 PM
6

HOOO-LEEEE-SHIIIEEETTT Found the cuck. I want off this crazy spaceship. Seriously someone stop the earth.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 07:10 AM
11

Assault charges. Easy.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/18 01:34 AM
1

I was going to say did you purposely pick that punny but accurate title. Then I realized it was the news outlet's name choice and now I'm left wanting to ask the author the same question.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:06 AM
239

Once upon a time, a prince asked a beautiful princess "Will you marry me?" The princess said no, and the prince lived happily ever after. And he rode motorcycles and fucked skinny, big-titted broads, and hunted and fished whenever the fuck he wanted, and went to naked bars, and dated women half his age, and drank whiskey, beer, Captain Morgan, and snorted cocaine off strippers' asses, and never heard bitching, and never paid child support or alimony. And ate pussies and ass-fucked cheerleaders a…
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 07:42 PM
2

Trick question. She never existed. AWALT.
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 07:36 PM
1

Female associate sent me this. Thought you guys might appeciate it.
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 10:06 AM
1

Why was my submission removed?
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 11:17 PM
10

I dig it. Always been a fan of 'workhorse' type equipment and vehicles and this has the nostalgia flair/look.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 06:34 PM
1

Don't try and 'fix' or convert feminists. That won't help much. Talk to normal women who are neutral on on the verge of leaning to the road you went down. Help them see the other side. Most importantly dare to lose friends or make a show in public. Most people (although 'wrong-thinkers' or people on that spectrum such as people who browse this blog probably aren't) are too afraid to go against the grain. One voice is usually many more.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:51 PM
2

That's terrible. I offer my deepest condolences sadly they will be worth little to nothing.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:05 PM
1

So some random totally obscure resources that embrace one aspect and then compiled into a list. How 'comprehensive' and 'influential'. Once I hear feminism in the streets is entirely and to a fundamentalist degree associated with ending male genital mutilation and the enforcement of mandatory prison sentences for baby mutilators I'll pay attention... but of course I know that'll never happen because at the end of the day feminism gives no sh*ts for men. If ever it does it is to serve its own pur…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:00 PM
1

Maybe it's time to embrace a bacon exclusive diet. I hear it's pretty effective at preventing this.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:45 PM
1

That is the tragedy. Inhuman monsters create the people that go on to masscre many innocent people and then media gives them a stage to preach from. Speaks volumes about culture.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:43 PM
2

Correct and it's horrifying. There's a reason it pays so well. Most people are happy to work a shitty day of work in a shitty business at minumum wage with some overtime before they scoop brains off the carpet and pick up skull fragments piece by piece with theid hands.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:36 PM
1

Seing shredded humans is brutal. Most men while never truly being able to handle it do quite a bit better.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:34 PM
1

Like that March for Our Lives chick who was like 'We bullied him but you don't know'. You're like any moral highground you just gave up there.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:31 PM
1

Beta uprising in action. If society doesn't quickly realize society exists very much on placating superficial males it will dissolve. You either have to keep them happy or exterminate them. Both of which are untenable under current political ideology and will leady to total collapse unless addressed.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:27 PM
1

Definitely no serious harm to see here. He didn't just end up going on to kill himself... Quoting someone else below: [–]HeForeverBleeds [+31] 158 points 2 days ago If the jury had found Berlinah Wallace had thrown the acid intending to kill or seriously harm Mark Van Dongen, and that her act was a significant cause of his death, it would have been open to them to find her guilty of murder. Clearly they did not find this to be the case.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:26 PM
1

I'll be honest I don't think I've lived by the majority of those basic rules but I will agree being OK with yourself in an empty room is an immense challenge. Where we disagree is I think 95% or more of the issue is the noise within yourself and your mind and the superficial fixes of let's call the Jordan Peterson's patch fixes don't do much. Existential dread isn't solved by showering. Neither is nihilism. You need to really look and question (although baby steps do help many people a lot). "[.…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:17 PM
1

No. People can reject people for whatever reason. The reality is more is at play than simply one factor and many of those are 'uncomfortable' to stomache. The reality is people want 'good looking' people. The reality is people should be able to reject fat women and short men. Whether you do or don't is your thing but the reality is biology matters and this is very much universal. We shouldn't encourage being fat and being short doesn't carry any of the direct health risks (it probably carries so…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:13 PM
1

Of course then it's just 'casual fun' and her trying to set me up with a super cute friend of hers for my benefit even if this is a cashier in a mall. Don't worry I'm aware of this. I'm just not going to fall for their bullshit as you and most (if not all) other people on this sub-Reddit don't. Me buying groceries is not me consenting to being touched by 2 girls and being setup with a third friend. I won't throw a hissy fit and call the police but just thought I'd add that to OPs post.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:05 PM
6

It wouldn't be feminist ekwaluhtee if women don't come out on top and men on bottom.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:55 AM
2

Not all heroes wear capes. Remember the courts are insanely biased. This man's future and life is very likely in your hands via testimony. Do not embelish of course but understand the necessity to detail everything as vividly as it happened.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:46 AM
0

You weren't pre-banned? That's incredibly 'open-minded' (actually using automated bots to pre-ban is just against Reddit's terms of service) of them.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:40 AM
2

KEK, I disagree with you likely on every point but I'm sure we'd be much more civil at a table heavily intoxicated just because of this line "lmao. The only mens issue the current left with accept is "not expressing feelings because of patriarchy". Best of luck fighting door to door. I hear it's hell.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:31 AM
3

Did you try to disprove a religion with facts and logic? See that's where you went wrong.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:27 AM
10

women don’t sexually harass men. Jesus this is nonsense. I spend half a decade between the late teens and early twenties being touched, propositioned and otherwise uncomfortably approached by women at every opportunity. I'm not going to go banning any speech though. Was a massive nuisance to deal with but God forbid people express interest even if it is unwanted.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:26 AM
2

After all being protected from rape is just male oppreshun. It wouldn't be ekwaluhtee unless it's impossible to rape a man you misogynist! /s
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:24 AM
3

It's more the other associated qualities. Lucking out genetically is just one tiny part of being an attractive man. You also need to max out that dark triad, make bank and have clout. Not to mention for men the dating game is very much polarized tot he higher end whereas or women if you can't get 10s you can get 8s. I'll be honest I'd probably take 6 months to get the 'ideal' amount of muscle but to be fair I put on muscle fairly easily. I won't pretend the amount that is sufficient today won't …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:20 AM
1

I know a big guy especially for his time 6'6" back then and he had a similar issue. Basically any time no matter what reason he dealt with a crazy woman whether it be drunk/drugs or something else (keep in mind this was the hippie generation) the cops would immediately white knight for the 'oppressed wymyns'. It was so bad that when I told my mother a decade later by chance about how biased domestic violence enforcement is and that occurence is actually around 45-55 she was like you know that fr…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:15 AM
2

Time to wear kilts without undies boys. Cool those gonads. If anyone questions it you can actually make a case for sexual health because temperature directly and almost immediately effects sperm production. Just fan that manskirt on a hot sunny day. If some girl even looks you direction wrong that's sexual assault. You didn't consent to her looking or giving you that judgement! You go brrh!
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:06 AM
2

Scarily accurate. Not wanting to have someone lose control of their bowels and diarrhea on you is just ableist propaganda. 'It's like an orgasm coming from much deeper withing them.' /s
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:03 AM
6

Anal is pretty gross objectively speaking. As is normal f*cking. Still good fun though.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:01 AM
6

Drooling over people isn't the issue and never should've been. Feminists decided men drooling over the female equivalents was 'oppreshun'. Under that lens pretty much all of us are oppressed because even the best looking of us don't tend to be in our best shape for the majority of our time (and yes if you've been in shape you know this torment, 4 pack vs. 8 pack).
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:00 AM
1

They live off soy. Soy milk in the morning with cereal, a soy latter on the way to work, a soy bar for a snack before lunch, a tofu burger with a side of soy bean sprout salad for lunch, a soy milk milkshake with soy milk ice cream as a reward in the afternoon, a tofu steak with edamame on the side for dinner and finally a nice warm glass of soy milk befored bed.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/18 09:09 AM
2

44,900 followers. 16% would buy. Let's say 50% are bots and 80% of the real people no longer care. That's 4,490 people who would buy used panties. At an upmark of 15 bucks that's 67,500. This is why the world is 'run by men'. Give any man an easy opportunity to make bank like that e.g.: selling boxers and he'd be on a phone with China for a 10,000 order.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/18 04:20 PM
1

Please they'll add several other programs before that ever happens: Women's Wednesday Miss/Misses Monday Thot Thursday Tramp Tuesday Slut Saturday Streetwalker Sunday ... and then they'll tell you sadly we're all out of days so we can't make one for men or boys.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:19 PM
1

Thanks to the SJW soon the only thing you'll be permitted to fap/flick your bean to in the future will be people of Walmart. Anything else would of course be lookism or attractivism (someone help me out here with a name).
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:57 PM
1

Something something sexism is power + privilege. Something something crazy patriarchy conspiracy is real. Something something can't be sexist against men. Something something therefore this isn't objectification or if it is it isn't harmful (because we all know every dude loves his package shrink wrapped and immortalized when smushed into a skin tight suit).
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:53 PM
1

I can only imagine if a man made this statement he'd be lynched either by a mob of radical feminists or a mob of cuckservative men. Not that I am endorsing the statement just pointing out the very likely if not outright guaranteed difference in reaction.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:51 PM
1

Intersectional feminism is just rebranded Marxism. After Marxism failed to break apart Western European nations with the using the classical class struggle propagandization th intellectuals of the Frankfurt school sought to find a new avenue and that was the dual prongs of race and sex. It is exactly the same in every other way. One is the supposedly oppressed and the other is the supposed oppressor and in turn any injustice done to the supposed oppressor is not just justifiable but 'progress'. …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:49 PM
1

It's Hupeople you misogynist bigot! Remember it's [CURRENT YEAR] SMH.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:45 PM
1

I won't stand for this discrimination! UN better get their act together and rebrand to UN Wopeople.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:44 PM
2

The Duluth model and what it has done is a massive red pill more people should mention. Not only is it blatantly sexist and anti-male since it by default assumes the man is wrong but also: When a woman called the police the man was ordered out of the house in 41.4% of cases meanwhile when the roles are reverse the woman was ordered out of the house in 0% of cases. When a woman called the man was arrested in 15.2% of cases and the counter part 0% again. Here's the messed up part, when a man calle…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:23 PM
1

Tragic because that's really how it seems to be these days. Worst of all it doens't seem like this will reverse in the near future, if anything existing while male will become a crime (or at least suspicious enough to warrant investigations for no other reason).
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:39 PM
8

People who have no desire to go on will naturally gravitate to the most dangerous forms. People who wish to use it as a last ditch cry for help will naturally go with the less dangerous ones. For men it's a: I'm past the breaking point here I go thing. For women it's a: I'm falling apart I need help. We can speculate how much of this comes down to the reality that by and large women do have a massive help apparatus whereas men have very little. Who knows. Maybe if society 'gave a fck men would a…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:19 PM
1

Communism killed around 93 million people (although estimates range from the low sixties to a quarter of a billion). Venezuela Zimbabwe Afghanistan Albania Angola Benin Bulgaria Cambodia Congo Czechoslovakia Ethiopia East Germany Hungary North Korea Mongolia Mozambique Poland Romania Somalia Soviet Union North Vietnam South Yemen Ukraine Yugoslavia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states (there are more failures) Meanwhile men built the world we know today and also maintain it. Co…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:34 PM
1

They want all the privileges without any of the work. It's the same with 'rights' they want all the rights without any of the obligations (e.g.: voting & the draft). It's how feminists (and a lot of spoiled entitled women) are.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 11:39 AM
5

http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:28 AM
2

Spell out S.C.U.M. Society for Cutting Up Men. That's actually what it is meant to stand for (even though the author likes to pretend like that wasn't what it stood for even though it appeared in a different advert and she was recruiting people under said acronym).
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:22 PM
2

Why are birth rates in the West plummeting? Why are young people having less sex than previous generations? Why are men no longer getting married? Can't wait for the news media spin regarding how these points and that it is somehow to blame on video games either directly or indirectly and not on feminists literally making things like this necessary (or more accurately a live interactive consent app that checks in every 5 seconds).
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:58 AM
0

Trying to save Sweden seems like a lost effort. You could help save other nations where your voice might actually matter. I hope in time you do.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:10 PM
2

What do you expect it's Sweden. Nonetheless their delusions about some glorious matriarchy are going to be beaten back by the Caliphate growing inside. So I guess jokes on them.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:04 AM
1

We want equality! Now give us special treatment, quotas and if neither of these suffice just screw the men who earned it and put some vagina in there for representation. That's feminism for you.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:11 PM
3

You sound awesome. I don't think your son will ever forget what you did for him!
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:04 PM
5

There is only one gender. Boeing AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter. Everything else is target practice. What you're defining is just individuality and of course every person's experience is slightly different.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:53 PM
1

At most there can be one gender per person, so there is not an infinite number of genders... Although it might get quite large if you consider people who died or still haven't been born. F*cking bigot! Don't you know there is one gender for every moment in time you or any other thing experiences. Initially I thought you were trying to argue that the gender ideologues weren't that insane but after getting past the first paragraph I saw you got the joke.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:51 PM
2

I thought the reeducation squads had already arrived in Australia? I'll be forwarding this to Anita Sarkeesian right now.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:57 AM
3

It's infinity genders you bigot!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:40 AM
4

I'll have you know there are infinite genders you bigot! Some SJW to the State of New York. This is why you don't ever apologize or try to appease SJWs. It isn't possible. If you give them your little finger they will take your whole civilization with them.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:40 AM
6

EKWAHLUHTEE!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:39 AM
4

Was he expecting sociology majors to be smart enough to do basic arithmetic? That's where he went wrong.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:38 AM
1

A crazy bitch doesn't make the world crazy. Although the fact that HR and the cops went along with that and did nothing shows how the system has rotted from within very thoroughly. As I was saying: "The problem is society is indulging these special snowflakes (neurotic personality disorder spectrum stuff)." If the meteoric rise of anti-feminism & anti-SJWism is anything to go by the pendulum will be swinging back hard in the coming decade. Traditionalism will make a comeback one way or another. …
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:29 AM
1

We're strong and indepent. Now go save that helpless princess.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:05 AM
1

Mine is the sane response to an insane world. The world is still rather sane. The crazy feminazi harpies are a tiny fraction of the population. Granted they can completely destroy a persons life but that is because so far greater society has indulged them instead of punishing their radical and destructive thought. Yeah. She played the "I'm a woman with a disability" card like a pro. Victim culture is probably one of the worst developments in recent history since it creates perverse motives and r…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:51 AM
1

This is another case of society falling apart. We've encouraged and indulged the crazies and then act as though the majority of people are crazy instead of it being an insane minority. Back in the day the solution used to be social ostracization for these people but nowadays that's probably illegal so I'm not sure how you would really solve this issue currently. Nonetheless I think you solution is akin to teaching women to avoid all men because some very small fraction of men are rapists. I get …
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:54 AM
1

I mean I'd assume it might be a small town friend or family owned business. Otherwise that sounds like it might get you into serious trouble or fired as you pointed out. At the same time I guess if you're divorced and feeling distraught and completely lost after having had your family, home and life likely ripped from you by unfair courts losing a job might not really matter than much. This is a bit of a side rant although it is marginally related: It's not really an endorsement of his behaviour…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:28 PM
1

Yep I'm also agreeing just adding onto it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:12 PM
3

Pretty much the standard don't talk to me unless you're 6'6" and a billionaire.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:55 PM
4

Obviously there's nothing wrong with saying I'm not into you. You don't have to take it as sleight against your honour and pretend like a guy handing you a number and simply quickly pointing he isn't a vagrant or a bum but rather a man down on his luck is some sort of injustice. It shows how inhuman feminists have become that they view the world through such a twisted lens.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:54 PM
1

You forgot that 'natural male tendency' to also want to murder their father! Didn't you learn anything in mandatory feminazi re-education? /s
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:51 PM
12

Well played. You picked up on that normal human interaction right there and aptly pointed out that expecting feminists to act like normal human beings is a little crazy.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:24 AM
50

This is retarded. He literally gave her a number politely an told her that he is a reasonable man. He literally left the ball in her park. All she has to do is say sorry I'm not interested or you know... maybe just go on a date with a guy who recently got divorced. I'm sure he'll appreciate a little leg up on the dating game, it's not like you have to kiss him just have coffee and who knows maybe he is a guy you might find interesting. Feminist puritanism is something else. It genuinely feels li…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:11 AM
1

Sure I do get the difference but fantasizing about something usually means you are simply someone who has given up hope (or there was none to begin with) so they aren't all that separated. Then I felt compelled to point out how even if it became reality the state itself would ensure men are not free to be left alone and instead are forced to continue to pay for women's stuff. I guess in a way I was lamenting with you that even if your fantasy came true that any peacefully resisting men would be …
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:15 PM
1

Appeal to emotion. There is no reasoning with feminists. Never under and circumstance let them have the moral high ground. Never interact on their terms. Always frame the discussion on your terms. Finally if at any point they do attain any sort of upper hand point out their aristocratic sense of superiority. They're all Marxists and this will drive them insane.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:08 PM
2

The sad reality is men think waaay too much with their dick for this (not that women would make it that long either). Beyond that it wouldn't work because the laws and govt. is setup such that you cannot avoid these realities. You will be 'doing stuff for them' even if you don't speak to a single woman for 5 years and assuming you're at work and do this you'll probably get reported to HR for sexism and end up fired if not worse.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:04 PM
1

I mean... they are pretty huge fans of importing hardcore Islamic patriarchy to the West.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:02 PM
2

The funny thing is the leftists are unironically and unknowingly advocating for the same moral puritanism that people in the past (including them) so lauded about the religious right and rightfully fought against and rejected. In the social justice utopia there isn't free love everywhere the way their delusional Marxist fantasies play out but rather a no love dystopia because even saying hello wrong to a woman (eventually this will also be extended to men) lands you in the reeducation camps so n…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:01 PM
-1

"I'm a free man he says unironically." Then he goes off and pays taxes the next year.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:57 PM
2

Yep around the time the US went off the Bretton Woods system which while it wasn't a gold standard was at least a weaker analogue. That's the moment this separated. You know who is always for a gold standard? The Austrian economists and Libertarians. You know who is for fiat currency and a central bank? Marxists... it's right there in the communist manifesto. Blame the right people for once. There is also another article debunking the way the stats are used in this graph if I recall correctly bu…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:31 PM
3

Seems like men are still in the running the same way women will still be in the running even after sex robot ownership is 'common place'. It probably will be somewhat similar to vibrators and women. Most men will probably try one at some point, some will always have one around but most will manage just fine without one.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 11:18 AM
2

Sex robots will not make men obsolete. Seriously how many women do you know that just need a nut... that's right, barely any. Women and men of course both want much more from a relationship than sex but on average men desire sex more than companionship and the other emotional benefits whereas for women this is inverse. Making a relationship robot is much harder than a sex robot. I honestly think all this 'women will be obsolete because we have a glorified fleshlight' nonsense is also hysteria. S…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 11:17 AM
5

Look at that baby hating piece of shit trying to feed his 'attack hounds' his own child! This proves that article where some crazed feminist said men would f*ck their mothers and murder their fathers is trust. /s just hoping this insanity stops before that is a serious position and the CPS abduct his children for also taking care of his dogs.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 10:13 AM
3

He is. I got him on some 100 or so down-votes. Rather neat spotting the simps and shills all around.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:27 PM
2

Pack it up boys. They've admitted 'social justice' is just sexism against men and racism against white people.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:28 AM
7

Still verified I see. So Twitter is still a staunch supporter or menicide even after the outrage it has caused.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:25 PM
1

Ugh... while this is nice of the person it isn't actually helpful. The logical consequence is that you just have 2 groups of delusional 'victims'. Here's the reality. Your looks matter (obviously not the only thing but a notable part) whether you are a man or a woman. This isn't some evil that must be expunged it is a healthy part of human nature which attempts to find the best possible mate and thereby ensures that the next generation has the best chance. If you're short tough luck. No amount o…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:47 PM
57

DE - STROYED
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 03:42 PM
1

So Twitter is now endorsing the death penalty! Keep that in mind folks.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:26 PM
1

Ah, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:03 AM
0

Don't take the following too personal. Read it as an aside as opposed to an attack. I would sincerely appreciate if we could leave the following two topics out of our discussions today: False accusations and Prevalence of Male Genital Mutilation As both of those topics are severe triggers for my PTSD. Thank you for respecting my request! Screams narcissistic entitlement. Other people have had their lives ruined or been mutilated. Your feelings do not override these people's right to a fair trial…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:45 PM
1

What is the meaning of purple pill in this case/context? I know the meaning of red/blue/black/white pill.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:00 PM
3

Lessons to be learned: Document every such interaction. You have the message exchanges. Next time film it. They pass it on to the authorities. The vast majority of offenders for both domestic violence and violence in general are repeat offenders. Report such people to the police so they not only have a record of such behaviour but can act in accordance with the law to charge the perpetrator. However never contact the police if you do not have sufficient documented evidence. In about 10% of cases…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 11:57 AM
1

They are banking on the media (both social an mainstream) backing them and helping them cover the mess ups while they use this totalitarian new system to scrub anyone who doesn't tout exactly what they want them to say. Think about it. Even if you're an entirely savoury character if you spend a few weeks on the internet you'll inevitably end up on some unsavory site. It's essentially unavoidable. How similar this Twitter program is to a scaled down variant of the Chinese social media points syst…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:55 AM
1

If people weren't domesticated they would not let themselves be taken to prison. This isn't a judgement just an 'observation'.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:48 AM
1

'Member when rappers weren't white-knights? I 'member.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:43 AM
3

That is an apt observation. Many people have made exactly that observation... but evidently the people over at Twitter did not.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:42 AM
5

Feminist academia.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:41 AM
0

LOL. Using competitors is running away. No it's hitting them where it hurts. Their customer base.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:21 PM
1

Eh... feminism is a religion at this point at least as dogmatic as the Abrahamic ones so why not. I mean they've already thrown the biology textbook out the window.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:23 AM
1

Gen Z seems pretty #WOKE. REEEs will soon be the accompanying music of progress and the steady march towards greater human rights.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:20 AM
0

Use Duck Duck Go instead. Google have made it clear that they have sided with the misandrist feminazis. No amount of petitioning and pleading will create meaningful change. At best they will cave and create a doodle but their ideological convictions will not have changed one bit and will make themselves felt in all other areas. Stop acting like battered husbands/wives. Break free from your tormentor. It's scary but within a few weeks you'll feel better.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:19 AM
3

Do they have same day delivery on those hoes? What about free shipping? Do they come in a multipack?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:15 AM
6

Being a 'hoe' is by no means a crime. This comparison is asinine. If being a hoe were a criminal offense that could results in years of jail time possibly death then I wouldn't care how many men claimed she was a hoe. Beyond that men that get a reputation in line with player etc. are equally avoided by serious potential partners and used for a fling the same way hoes are.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:14 AM
1

Welcome to the real world, lefty.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:58 AM
2

Apologies for a second separate reply but do they have a website or single source where you can donate and the resources are divided up amongst the different nations?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 08:01 PM
2

Thanks for the extensive info.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 07:54 PM
1

Nice. Soon they'll be prosecuting all men that aren't at least 8s, 6'2", muscular, intelligent, earning 100,000 or more and have great fashion sense for being naked in their own shower and possibly having a pimple or two on their shoulder or something. Think about it. If a woman thinks of a guy that is that was and it is off-putting to her then clearly you have raped her mind! Even though technically she would have harassed the guy by envisioning him naked but SJWs have assured me that men canno…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:43 AM
1

So you're telling me that they rejected a band consisting entirely of trans-black, trans-Muslim & trans-women?! That's shocking. They probably just didn't know because you guys are a bunch of trans-black, trans-Muslim & trans-women who don't present outwards that way but still totally are and questioning that fact, your logic in reaching such a conclusion or even if such a thing is possibly is not only racist, an example of religious bigotry and sexist but ableist as well. You shouldn't be expec…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:38 AM
54

This is why you don't spit into the wind.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/17 01:28 PM
1

Arbitrarily selecting an age at which people deserve life? Well cool. Lets just shoot anyone who is 50+ and goes into a hospital. They've already donated 2/3rds of their productive lives and about half of their productive potential.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:40 PM
2

Oh boy. Late term abortions would have created some quality REEEs in that case.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:38 PM
1

Equality and fair funding isn't an us vs. them scenario. Not that I am even for that idea but that is usually the position people who support this advocate for. Personally I think good on the breast cancer advocates for finding a way to find that much funding. Prostate cancer advocates should learn from them.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:37 PM
1

IF this is true. Discrimination lawsuit if the elevator has a camera. Show no mercy. Prison time if possible.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:34 PM
1

Did she at least spend any time in jail for her false accusation?! I bet she didn't and that is outrageous.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:20 AM
2

It's true taxes don't equal slavery. They are extortion paid to a mob that holds the monopoly on violence (in almost all nations). Also I M P L I C I T C O N S E N T is a disgrace. That would be like saying you agree to being raped because you live under a system where you never got a choice to say no and the mere notion of saying no would result in you being raided by police that would imprison you for saying no or kill you if you sufficiently resist.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:12 PM
5

Running into a barely visible object like a glass door or a fairly well concealed pillar isn't pussy pass denial. That's just something that happens to everyone at some point in their life when they're too eager to get somewhere quick and paying too little attention to what's ahead of them
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/17 09:22 AM
1

You could give calling them a go and become part of the up to 14% percent of men that end up being arrested when they call the police regarding domestic violence from their female partner. You know. Equality.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:11 PM
1

"Lead educator" I see she clearly got her credentials in feminist dance study or something similar.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:08 PM
1

That's not what your Marxist ideologues & professors tell you it is about but that very much is exactly what it always ends up being about. Well minus the food people had back in the stone age times.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:06 PM
3

"dystopia" See I found the part of the story that these 'movie critics' seem to have missed.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:04 PM
4

.#ManBan In before something ridiculous like that is actually proposed by misandrist radfems.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:02 PM
1

It depends. If you believe in freedom of association then no. People can have women's and men's only areas in private businesses. However this also means that those private businesses can have religion X, race Y, ethnicity Z only areas if you're to be consistent. At the same time if you don't believe that private businesses can serve who they please and must serve everyone then both men's and women's only areas or businesses should be done away with. Arguably such a belief would also mean separa…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:41 PM
3

You sir have '[Gazed into the abyss long enough for the abyss to gaze back into you.]' I'd say it's very accurate which makes it so much more unsettling.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:46 PM
1

EKWALUHTEE
/r/MensRights27/09/17 01:40 PM
3

Classy comment. Movement for equality* of course. *Equality is understood to mean adult females that lean radically left on the political spectrum are to be placed above everyone else and be excused from any and all wrong doing and given special assistance whenever they themselves deem that they have been wronged by anything regardless of whether it is real or made up on the spot.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:46 PM
13

Seems like the inevitable consequence but it isn't as though the radfems or SJW types have been against segregation. ...but of course they'll ban male only clubs for being 'sexist' and get govt. assistance for female only clubs for being 'a necessary institution'.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 10:43 AM
2

If they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:03 AM
1

Well, time to dictate exactly what women must do. For 'the greater good' of course. [TRADITIONALISM INTENSIFIES]
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:02 AM
5

Imagine if a guy got in his face like that. Granted Australian bouncers are actually educated and trained very differently than bouncers in most nations (at least in many establishments) they are really there to prevent harm and help people and extremely accommodating. They are generally there to deescalate in almost all situation unlike bouncers in most nations that are horny to hop in and deck some drunk cunt but there is no way you get away with that much as a guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/17 07:58 AM
9

"In terms of sex and aesthetics, a survey conducted by Queen's University's Sex Lab found that women prefer circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio." Because how it looks to someone of the opposite sex is clearly worth mutilating and destroying the vast majority of the sensation in the organ for the person. This nonsense rightfully wouldn't hold for FGM and it shouldn't hold for MGM. If you choose to have a similar procedure once you're old enough to by all means but then you're…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:33 PM
8

Well I like my women blinded, infibulated, maimed so below the knees and elbows and turned into a breeding vegetable so let's make that happen. Obvious sick example of how such reasoning is insane. I'm not a sick psycho who wants to mutilate other people unlike the writer of this article.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:23 PM
15

The funny thing is even reading that comment made me physically aggravated. Why so many women & men don't understand this when the genders are reversed perplexes me.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:20 PM
8

Pinnacle of accountability. Imagine my shock.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:18 PM
6

What's more commendable than endorsing the mutilation of babies' or childrens' genitals. It's a shame this is even a battle that needs to be fought. The issue starts with the notion that men orgasm too fast -backed up by studies and common cultural beliefs- and that because of this circumcision can be an asset.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:18 PM
3

I don't think that at all. Men and women have different ways of dealing with stress. Men don't want to talk about their problems. They want a solution or for them to go away otherwise engaging them on it just adds more stress. You see this manifest most in older men when differences that don't have massive effects have had a long time to express themselves indirectly. If you want male suicides to go down give them a purpose. A family, a job, a girlfriend. Talking doesn't help. Even the 'talking'…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:38 AM
22

I'm with you on that. Suicide is terrible regardless want genitals the person has. However since men and women do experience emotions very differently and tend to have very different coping strategies for stress this is a field where treating men and women the same would likely just result in ineffective redress of the issues for both men and women. How one might go about allocating the prevention resources them might be the question and it isn't an easy one with a clear cut answer.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:09 PM
1

Humour (at least the unapproved by the hegemony) is not allowed. You'll find this is an iterations of authoritarianism through the ages.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:34 PM
1

TFW you get your badge of honour, namely get labelled by the orthodoxy as evil/heresy. FeelsGoodMan Welcome to the club folks. Wear your 'star of david' badge with pride.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:33 PM
1

Strong independent woman threatened by anthropomorphized fleshlight. Doesn't sound so strong or independent to me. It's hilarious how the leftists have become just as bad as the religious right was just 30-40 years ago.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:29 PM
2

This is very true. Woman watches porn -> Dude goes nice put that on the table and does her from behind. Dude watches porn -> OMG he's not fantasizing about me all the time. Obviously take it with a pinch of salt but by and in large that is the trend and I would its somewhere between a 40/60 to 30/70 relationship.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:26 PM
1

In be4 WiGTOW
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:24 PM
1

Because then where is all their free shit going to come from? They did a study in New Zealand that found that over a lifetime women are actually a massive burden to society. To be fair men only came out about at equilibrium but that's a lot better than 150k in the red.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:23 PM
90

Still got a long way to go for equality! Push more girls to suicide for equality! 'Progress' & 'Justice'
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:21 PM
25

'The hood'? That looks like some affluent neighbourhood and they sure throw punches like people who are just having their fight cherry popped.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/17 03:06 PM
3

What kind of terrible human being would do that... How hard is it to just drop a kid off somewhere far far away where you know they won't be left out instead of murdering a defenseless infant?! I get it. Some people don't want a child. Some people aren't capable of caring for a child at the point they are in in their lives. I'm sure there is some way to convey this in a sincere letter to an orphanage/hospital/Church/etc. If not there are those no fault surrender options in some states... how is …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:37 PM
2

Also something about the wonderful public housing the state provides to men who do not support their children financially.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:31 PM
1

It's not blaming the victim when the victim is a man because men can't be victims. Thank the SJWs for this, CURRENT YEAR of course Good on the guy for not letting another person suffer because he himself has been hurt and wronged.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:29 PM
2

Women do better = toxic masculinity (which is caused by the patriarchy). Women do worse = sexism (which is caused by the patriarchy). You can't win with any kind of SJW. Their ideologies are unfalsifiable and as such exist purely in the realm of pseudo-science & belief.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:24 PM
2

SOUNDS LIKE A PUSSY PASS IS BEING GRANTED NOT DENIED If a man did the same thing he'd be in prison for at least a decade and NO ONE would shout foul play or demand a '2nd chance'.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/17 12:04 PM
1

Of course not. But denying people sex because of some 'distinction' you draw is decidedly SJW. It's obviously wrong to rape but denial is it's own issue.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 10:59 AM
3

Well no but it sure gets a lot more likely that it is. People who are adults and have sustained some sort of brain injury do still desire sex. It's always a very strange subject to discuss but saying never f*ck them seems far worse.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:37 PM
8

ROFL Reddit has a 'shocking sub-Reddit' warning. What a disgrace. Even an empty sub-Reddit can now be 'shocking'. Someone make a blimp sized thought-police Reddit Snoo.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/17 04:52 PM
1

God forbid they remove children from actual neglectful or abusive situations. Pretty much. Brings up that post that someone made in the same time span where a father had reported the mother of a child as being abusive twice and this mother then killed the child by stomping on it.* CPS would probably break up a big happy family because they let their kids get out and play & run around naked in the back yard because theoretically a pedophile somewhere could be using binoculars to get his fix. It's…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:40 AM
3

Except it is a father cradling his sick & feverish child in the shower for hours to keep the child's temperature down and the photographer who is also the mother is documenting this sacrifice and drawing attention to the sacrifices fathers make for their children. Next you're going to morally grandstand and ban kids playing naked because someone might see them or you'll advocate that those parents that have naked pictures of their kids and have shown them to people (HINT: it's pretty much all of…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:29 AM
66

I think the headline would look more like this. Buzzfeed: Stunning & brave mother redefines what it means to be a mother and a strong woman in 2017 while being objectified by her piece of s***, pedophile repeat rapist husband.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:32 AM
2

I would say if you're already investigating it document it. Maybe write a short story/book. Hand it over to some men's rights & clubs and men's rights forums.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:28 AM
1

Take children away from men who would care for them and make a home for them ensuring they grow up to be healthy fully functional adults and give those children to cruel, selfish single mothers who use the child for nothing but free welfare and disinterestedly raise a child that then goes on to be extremely dysfunctional, violent and incapable of functioning well in society. Or so it appears.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:08 AM
2

How in the world do you cut the sentence of a serial child abuser who has deprived her child not only of food but on top of that stomped on her to the point that it killed the child?! Is nothing sacred...
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:06 AM
206

...can't show images of fathers taking care of their children... might break the conditioning that all men are just heartless raping machines. This is insanity. It doesn't even show any junk. Poor mother. Hopefully the court isn't as retarded as CPS.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:51 AM
1

The far right are Libertarians, AnCaps & market fundamentalists although the Libertarians and AnCaps often get into disagreements with such individuals since they claim they use pro-market rhetoric to sell a strong & very present govt. which is one of the right's main contentions. Libertarians & AnCaps are more than happy to be ridiculed and have their ideas challenged since that's literally their existence day in day out, they literally embrace the jokes and start using them as their own see: "…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/17 06:00 AM
2

Aren't particularly well acquainted with their political positions. Who are a bit seriously over emotional. Yep. Hallmark of a snowflake. Also breaking out in tears when someone simply asks you to defend your position isn't a bit over emotional. It's being an emotional infant. Seriously, try it with little kids. They do that between say 4 and 6 (usually run away sometimes cry), beyond that they often look at you with the 'deer in the headlights stare' and at around 8-10 they begin to defend thei…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/17 05:46 AM
2

Got to fill those brothels so that Germany can financially cover 'sexual emergencies' that migrants may encounter somehow. Not quite applicable since this is a decade old article but might as well make the joke. Taxation is theft. You must use your body to pay for other people's stuff against your will. In this case people are forced to stop receiving stolen money earned by the the labour of the bodies of others if they do not wish to use their own bodies to fund themselves. Seems like a good so…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/17 04:55 AM
-3

EKWAHLUHTEE
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:58 AM
54

SNOWFLAKES MELT THE MOMENT THEY ENCOUNTER ANY HEAT. THIS IS WHY THEY NEED THEIR SAFE-SPACES This isn't PPD content though. Probably more appropriate on anti-leftist/anti-SJW sub-Reddits.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 06:54 AM
18

Being for equality is now hateful?! OP seems to be a bigot who thinks women can't possibly be held to the same standards as men. Probably also thinks non-white people need special gibmes because how else might they be able to compete. But remember he's totally not a sexist and a racist he's an anti-sexistTM and anti-racistTM. You know... like a reactionary who would have no cause if he couldn't find new things to get offended about all the time as legitimate reasons dwindle at breakneck pace.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/17 06:39 AM
1

Favourity feminist: Obviously the prophet Muhammad himself. A sloppy, wet, hairy... Aussia bloke. The black dudes in Justin's security detail would top both of them. /u/-redditardation- <-- Soon to be this cunt right here.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 11:49 AM
3

In be4 banned for not being politically correct
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/17 02:19 PM
6

THE SHITPOSTS FLOW FREELY THROUGH THIS ONE SAVAGE
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 09:57 AM
270

For people who claim to want equality so desperately they sure do dislike universal equality before the law.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/17 08:56 AM
21

Savage
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/17 01:26 PM
56

Don't let no white CIS male keep your blood sugar down sistah.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/17 11:33 AM
96

After all those evil white men have used 'science' to keep women down for ages. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/17 11:32 AM
22

/u/spez is a cuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/17 03:16 PM
3

So Reddit is WhiteKnighting?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/17 03:09 PM
22

Sure but those tend to be 'cheap' infused mass produced diamonds. Not the kind that fetch a high price or make it into jewelry.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:11 PM
3

How did I miss this comment. Solid gold.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:04 PM
80

I mean if I wanted to be a real shallow bastard I'd point out that one is loyal to the death and the other goes to whomever pays the most. ...but I'm not that unkind.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:03 PM
34

Mate just screencap yourself and submit it to /r/whiteknighting.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:02 PM
2

Also an entirely fair interpretation since it is seen as 'here's some cash, go crazy'. I wouldn't do it but I do understand where such sentiment comes from. I find this 'moral dilemma' one of the better ones.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 09:53 PM
2

Interesting and very forthcoming. Hadn't considered the 50/50-US$50 for the initial expenses.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 09:52 PM
2

I'm thinking of a situation where no direct/overt statements regarding the nature of the money are made. Of course if a clear statement is made then it'd be much easier to solve. I'm thinking of the situations where no such statement is made since they really are the ones that would be interesting and in my opinion give insight into someone's character/moral compass.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 06:14 PM
6

My man. If that would be the girls answer you definitely throw in a Vegas marriage at the end of that adventure.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 05:55 PM
24

This is an interesting moral dilemma. I'd say that 50%-50% would be fair however you could genuinely make the case that you could have it all, you owe the other party all of it or that you only owe the other party US$ 50. Lets hear some other takes on this.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 05:40 PM
2

That's exactly what I was joking about... A normal woman can easily one up that though at this point in time. where we are in 20 years will of course be a different question but I'm not going to predict the future.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:32 PM
4

Of course. If they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all. I mean just recently there were some trying to get sex robots banned because it 'perpetuates male dominance hierarchies' or 'objectifies women'. As if a woman is replaceable by a rubber machine (although to be fair that does get the job done better than a feminist so I guess they aren't wrong to feel threatened when the very low value men have a way out of marrying them).
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:24 PM
13

So what? Sex robots aren't sentient. They're probably some 1/10th Raspberry Pi playing a fairly basic routine. Sex ROBOT that's all you need to know. I mean rape fatasies aren't half the sick things humanity can think up and get off on. Have these people ever browsed the internet. 2 hours on the darker but still entirely there for everyone to see internet and you're huddled in a corner hugging a pillow crying for mommy (and I'm not particularly prude).
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:23 PM
4

You aren't pre-banned?!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 10:22 PM
1

Who wrote that?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 01:58 PM
2

They're so alien to internet culture they think it's a shaming sub-Reddit but they've become so permanently offended at everything and anything that anyone who isn't part of their clique wouldn't take it seriously so being 'branded' is actually a mark of honour.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 07:59 AM
1

Using insults doesn't work if they aren't accurate. Calling SJWs triggered works well because they are over-emotional babies that lash out and throw a tantrum whenever they encounter something they don't like. Calling some people who have no issue with a bunch of offensive content that doesn't really work. As another example calling a big strong man (you gon' get triggered by that traditional gender role?) weak doesn't really work because he knows he is strong and knows you are simply wrong. How…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 07:51 AM
2

When did leftists hold themselves to any standards? When did they ever practice what the preach if it doesn't so happen to be convenient?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 07:08 PM
19

That's fine. If you aren't on their list your sub-Reddit ain't shit or is a SJW circle-jerk. We're where we belong. On the radar and triggering lefties.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 07:07 PM
1

'right-wing' on Reddit. You know even the 'neo-Nazi' sub-Reddits are left wing. Right wing mans belief in individualism to the fullest. You meet a leftists and he says all right wingers are bad. You meet a leftists who things he's right wing and he says all Jews are bad. You meet someone who is actually right wing and he says I was leftist Jew but fair enough but if you ever try some ANTIFA or neo-Nazi shit you'll perish.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:25 PM
1

Dank memes is what you call them. Mate, time to move to a retirement home without internet access you'll be happier. This whole new young people stuff doesn't seem to be for you.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:52 PM
1

People who like memes don't use normie and dank?! Mate, you're beginning to make the Clinton campaign seem in tune with internet culture by comparison even considering the whole making a page long post about Pepe being a Nazi.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:41 PM
1

Those suck total ass. WOW. You make normies look like dank memesters than shitpost with the best.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:36 PM
1

The guy who claims to be an expert at appreciating memes comes out as a complete normie. Shocking. Which memes are good? Well in the past 12 months: The pepe ones that got a presidential nominee to come out as total internet illiterate and literally label a cartoon frog a Nazi. The ones that got a major news network so triggered they threw a hissy fit and threatened to doxx someone. The ones that claimed that a major news network was literally working with a terrorist organization and then by ch…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:03 PM
1

Jealous of 2015 Trudeau memes in [CURRENT YEAR]. I think not. Also using the actual year instead of [CURRENT YEAR] (or some other HTML variation thereof) is pretty normie.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:58 AM
1

Show how little you know about memes. They aren't measured in 'good' or 'bad'. They're either dank as fuck or stale. Dunning Kruger right here folks. You're probably better off leaving the memeing to bonafide shitposters as normie.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:11 AM
4

Still using [CURRENT YEAR] meme while complaining about other people using stale memes.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:19 AM
3

Well I guess since you have no sense of humour and aren't here to engage in any reasonable exchange of ideas enjoy bitching. Here I'll happily give you something to get triggered about: Men are people to, they deserve human rights, feminism is a supremacist movement that outright states it aims for equality for women, equality of outcome isn't equality but servitude and one of your side's favourites... 'you're on the wrong side of history'. Thanks for confirming the following from my previous co…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:45 AM
2

Ah yes. Classic regressive. Trying to draw a parallel between an ideology and the people who hold that ideology. I'm sure you go on about how criticism of Islam is also a human rights abuse in your world because you're totally being 'racist' against Muslims if you levy any criticism against the religious doctrine.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:30 AM
3

Illustrating a point isn't claiming something but it does a pretty good job of highlighting how bigoted a statement is. Feel free to have a look at: https://www.reddit.com/r/StormfrontorSJW/ https://www.reddit.com/r/menkampf/ Feminists have becoming authoritarian sexists and men are really the scapegoats that are blamed for just about all of societies ills so there are parallels. Anyone who isn't a moron, has no sense of humour or is purposely misinterpreting something would know that there is o…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:28 AM
6

In both cases I'd tell them they are idiots and to buy some liter based shampoo or accept that they will pay a pretty ridiculous premium for hair perfume. It's like tooth paste. If the main purpose was cleaning people's teeth it'd likely cost a tiny fraction of what it costs these days. The reality is a massive part of the business is in packaging, marketing etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 06:42 PM
4

Change it around. How can Jews improve themselves. What flaws should be addressed. Nazis BTFO. Notice how nothing is wrong. It's two different 'articles' that are featured next to one another and although you'd have a lot of problems directly connecting them somehow anyone who isn't being purposely obtuse would see the connection.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:17 PM
25

Why is it retarded? Humour me. If I can literally slap: "For Women" on a product and make X% more and then slap "For Men" on the same product and sell X% more (albeit at a lower profit margin) what's wrong. Look if you want shampoo that's just shampoo and keep your hair clean but the shit that comes in gallon or hotel drum formats. It isn't great but that's why it is so cheap. If you've used that stuff for a few years you know why 'shampoo' costs so much for each tube.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 05:14 PM
4

NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL EKWALUHTEE What an insane world. Endless screeching about 'equal treatment' and then when it happens 'OMG how could they?!'.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:10 PM
1

Exactly. In fact according to their Marxist doctrine we should probably be encouraging young girls to commit suicide to close the gap. ...but we know that'll never happen because feminism isn't about equality.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:55 PM
1

If you want to understand why this happens you needn't look further than the OKcupid analysis of what people find attractive. Men found women attractive on roughly and equal distribution while women found 80% of men unattractive. The reality is biology has programmed women to only seek the most desirable men and those don't tend to kill themselves (although rock stars are an exception in many ways but also have many other downsides.).
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:54 PM
1

If 'news' articles are fine what issue is there. 4Chan has had a much better track record than the media.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:52 PM
0

Liberalism was hijacked by 'the left' around the 50-60s and with Marxist thought. Before that being liberal was about liberty and generally right leaning if not extremist in its individualism. If you think of yourself as an actual liberal these days call yourself a classical liberal.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:50 PM
69

ARE YOU ASSUMING MY GENDER?!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 12:54 PM
390

... if you're going to give a company more money for the same product because you're too lazy/stupid to compare or too easily manipulated by packaging you have no one to blame but yourself. This really is the state of modern feminism. We're so strong and empowered we can't do anything for ourselves and cannot under any circumstance be held accountable for our actions! Society has to protect us because you know special treatment is equality?!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 09:44 AM
-8

Every woman who met a man who saw this and thought, hey society is pretty weighted against my favour. I think I'll hold off on this marriage deal until it has more benefits or less (potential) costs for me once more. Given the 325 or so up votes I'd wager that this happened for at least one person.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 06:07 AM
1

You need 10 minutes to come up with a proper argument... I told you stop throwing rocks out of glass houses. If you take 10 minutes to write 3 short paragraphs I could probably link you a typing game that might get you up to around the same typing speed as most of the 60+ people I know with a bit of dedication. I guess you've somewhat confirmed both though since you haven't formulated an argument and take 15 seconds to type out "retard". Here I'll show you how it's done: I don't have time for yo…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:00 PM
1

As I said I'd take your word for the contents of the article since I didn't and still don't feel like reading it and am happy enough to assume you're not misrepresenting it or if you are discuss the hypothetical that creates. You obviously aren't that clever then or lack self-control if replying isn't 'worth your time' yet you can't help yourself. You know lacking impulse control is usually a decent sign of low intellect function since delaying gratification is so very important to success. Just…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:50 AM
1

Ah yes, that's a very mature way to engage in discussion: call people names and then ignore what they say and keep calling them names lest you be exposed as what you claim other are.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:10 AM
1

PS: since I messed up that hoisted on your own petard phrase before and it would've made a decent right back at you.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:13 PM
1

Well if everything I said is plain nonsense then you either didn't read the article or misrepresented what was being discussed. You're shooting yourself in the foot here. Doesn't speak to your intellect if you're getting hoisted on your own petard by a 'moron'. EDIT: messed that old-timey phrase up.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:27 PM
1

You're just butthurt that you can't claim some 'victory'. Throwing insults around doesn't change that. It just makes it more obvious. The amusing thing is you literally agree with my positions but you just can't bring yourself to admit it because it would reveal that you're the one that cannot admit fault (I was happy to acknowledge it) and are the one with the blinders on (getting hung up on one specific event isn't the stuff of an intellectual heavyweight). I don't read every link on Reddit* n…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:09 PM
1

Well the title said wife. I was happy to include the additional info that you gave but you thought it was some glowing 'beat down' when it wasn't. The statements I made remain appropriate and reasonable. They went as follows: Courts should not legislate against the right to self-determination. New information comes in showing that it wasn't actually that but rather that Google Translate garbled the website and swallowed a lot of essential information. Given new information from you the courts st…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:26 PM
0

As I'd said before my points don't change. If he did those things then he should (and was) convicted of at least some of the things I mentioned. There are laws that cover grievances against self-determination. The dude doesn't have to fuck his wife. Since you've said that you obviously agree with that sentiment so... Since there are some legal systems where a marriage must be consummated to be recognized and if you'd argue in court that you never had intercourse the court did/would (where no fau…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 10:09 AM
0

Now that you mention that the Translate app actually has a bug for this website which results in it cutting the article short by about 80%. Nonetheless my points don't change simply because they are pretty much obvious. If he did something wrong he deserves to be punished but that should not involve forced intimacy especially of sexual nature. You literally cannot enforce the right to self-determination by stripping people of it.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:38 PM
0

Again the article makes no reference to all the things you mention including locking her in the house and assault. I'm happy to accept that when I see a credible source. Although it change nothing about my statements. They remain the same. Since you obviously missed it and are in the mood to white knight I made it expressly clear that the would be multiple ways to file legitimate claims vs. this person if what you say is true (even though the article does not mention it). Nonetheless no matter w…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:33 PM
0

Also that article mentions none of the other heinous things you mentioned. So: Source please. As that article reads the man is well within his rights to do what he did. Not saying marrying a woman you never wish to have sex with is noble but there are many situations you could think up where you might find yourself in such a situation and simply wouldn't. Even if we ignore all situations that presume malice.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:06 PM
0

Or just someone who makes a reasonable response to a title. Granted I should have presumed clickbait but I would've assumed that someone posting it here would have done that 'fact checking'. Also feel free to actually debate the assertions I made. What happened is largely irrelevant to those arguments. I am happy to correct myself when I am wrong but my principles remain. I appreciate your correction but self-righteous aggrandizement means literally nothing when you take on positions that are pr…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:03 PM
0

Wouldn't matter. At no point could a court force someone to have sex without violating many freedoms people hold dear. Self-determination, expression, self-ownership, right to be left alone are just the ones that come to mind off the top of my head. Irrespective of what he did.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:42 PM
1

Pretty sure the joke went over your head.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:38 PM
1

That sub-Reddit is actually hilarious. It's like Stormfront or SJW. They take shit Tumblrinas, SJWs, radfem etc. say and swap out the terms to illustrate just how vile the statements are.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:10 AM
1

How was he not punished for all those things? If he did all those things he should receive appropriate punishment. That sounds like it would be a fairly easy case to make for a few things: emotional and psychological abuse restriction of freedom assault If the solution to what you're describing (I haven't double checked so we'll presume what you're saying is true) and the verdict was have sex with her that seems like an even greater failing of the justice system than what was previously describe…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:08 AM
4

I don't know exactly who made it but whoever did made one of the most illiberal laws. How people who enact such laws go unpunished is beyond me. Passing laws that violate basic rights (in nations where they exist) should be brought to trial. How you can strip someone of the presumption of innocence so easily is terrifying.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:21 PM
2

Good thing she didn't shoot anyone while using her rifle as a crutch and aiming it at her head and other officers.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:01 PM
10

It's a shame the person/people convicting this guy didn't. Spain and Portugal have some crazy anti-male sentiment and laws. If I'm not mistaken in Spain merely being reported for domestic abuse gets you thrown in jail for 48 hours without 'pesky things' like the presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:18 AM
142

Ah yes. Loading people up onto trains to be exterminated en masse. Where have I heard this before. Something leads me to believe this has been tried before and didn't work out too well. Anyways I've probably had a little to much to think and will report myself to the re-education camps now.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:08 AM
31

You can't force someone to engage in intimate actions with someone. If it is deemed abusive similar to deprivation of affection then the option is to allow one party to leave the relationship. In no just world is it then acceptable to by court mandate force someone to be affectionate let alone have sex.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:05 AM
31

SO TOLERANT SO PROGRESSIVE Men have no say in when or if they wish to have sex (the fact that it is a spouse changes nothing).
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:03 AM
1

Perfectly reasonable to halt the trial the side effects were pronounced. I can sympathize with women who think taking the pill is a big issue. I wouldn't want anyone I am with messing with their hormones. In turn I'd expect them to sympathize with this (which as it can cause sterility is rather severe).
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:55 PM
3

Men acting as a collective to guarantee that men are granted human rights. Human rights for men in line with what they are for women and children. To fight against injustice against men and to make the voices of countless unheard men heard. Maybe in our lifetimes men will be treated like human beings... although I am not sure this will happen.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:52 PM
12

The amount of men that commit suicide after breakups is very unnerving. Men are human beings too. They commit suicide because they feel they cannot cope at that moment. If there is someone present at that moment what might have been a suicide might just become a dark 2 years in someone's life. The crazy thing is even with such an 'epidemic' little to no attention is paid to it. If men got anywhere near the support they might get if this were a women's issue I'm sure you we would see a massive de…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:48 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:36 PM
2

URL of a video summarizing the issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8l40jT1N67M Law URL: http://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2017-03/netzdg.pdf
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:05 PM
12

You racist sexist homophobe transphobe bigot <any other buzzword slurs I missed>. He'd obviously also had her a pair of balls. /s
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:26 AM
5

Except it also slapped on an internet censorship mandate on the same bill.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:07 AM
1

Well everything isn't that the whole purpose of such a needlessly broad statement :P
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 07:53 PM
2

Under-rated comment. this deserves at least as many likes as mine.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 07:52 PM
1

This could be a well subscribed to sub-Reddit idea :P
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 07:48 PM
1

Nope security asked them to move to the back if I'm not mistaken but after hearing their case did nothing. Nonetheless that security would suggest such a thing and considering that the co-founder of VidCon is a leftist (the cucky guy from SciShow) does open an avenue for that to 'become policy'.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 08:52 PM
1

Libel and slander laws should be harsh. You do understand that those laws refer to very specific circumstances where you aim to attack someone's reputation to damage their livelihood. They have little to do with 'free speech' in general since so long as you aren't spreading genuine misinformation or disinformation in bad faith they will never impact you. If you actually want to do away with those then you're a free speech absolutist which is fine as well (but also entirely unworkable in modern s…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 08:50 PM
1

I mean... How do you post a headline like that with a photo like that underneath. Do these people not proof read because I'm sure that'd answer her question.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 04:43 PM
24

He was actually doing the post VidCon whining on purpose to 'give them a taste of their own medicine'. I also thought it was petty and that the much better solution would have been to let Anita flip her shit once more but you can understand why they might do this. Especially if you consider that she did violate the convention rules and that if it weren't for all the obvious video evidence the shitlords would probably have been asked to either not participate or sit at the back.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 04:42 PM
765

Existing with intent will be a hate crime before the year is done. Mark my words.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 04:40 PM
3

I mean he probably deserve it for not conforming to the sexist stereotype that all men are by birth rapist abusers. Some radical feminist out there right now
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:33 PM
2

Because who's to say it will never happen to you. Just keep in mind no one is a law abiding citizen. There are hundreds of thousands of laws that you have never read. Do you truly think you've never broken any of those?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:27 PM
4

'Asian privilege' would definitely be a thing in the US where on average Asians tend to do better than whites in the standard metrics SJWs use to prove oppression: Income Education Over-represented in high paying positions
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:11 PM
6

We know this. The difference is men don't deny this. Even the biggest guy walks down a dark alley thinking about what might happen (but that's never counted in surveys). The SJW/Feminist types deny that female on male violence exists and somehow act like a man who is unarmed is 'less dangerous' than a woman who is armed.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:00 PM
5

I don't think they are wrong. If you throw all people with the same junk into one basket that is very negative that does meet the criterion. Not that I think hate speech is a reasonable & defensible concept (specifically for reasons like this) just saying that by the views of those that think it is such a statement would qualify.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:08 PM
1

Then again the Marxist and their ilk read 1984 as: "An introduction to a completely centralized society 101". The Matrix was probably created by some loony Marxist who had figured out how to make everyone happy and he damn well would regardless of whether they consented or not (see how in the original Matrix it was a 'perfect world' - but even that failed). Honestly it's so incredibly inefficient, violates individual rights so wholly and the utopian vision turned into a dystopia so quickly I can…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:45 PM
3

I'm going to go with Clockwork Orange then a lobotomy and then forced castration followed by extermination. Pretty sure I painted every radfems wet dream right there. Funny how they are the people who shout Nazi all the time.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:46 AM
2

Scary because this is current standard policy.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:44 AM
18

How long until they bring back lobotomies?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:25 PM
1

US$ 50,000-75,000 is doing very well for yourself. Which is where you might find yourself if you were a hard working individual with an average IQ after a decade or two. Doing fine would be much closer to the bottom with an income around say 30,000. Where you're not necessarily struggling but getting by just fine with little to spare. IQ for the reasons I mentioned in the past. There isn't much reason to obsess about it beyond being aware of it influences those metrics. If you could raise averag…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:24 PM
2

You're significantly less likely to be a brilliant anything if you have poor brain function. Granted if you had high fluid intelligence and used that to acquire high crystalline intelligence and then lose that fluid intelligence you will remain just as learned up to that point. Doing just find doesn't mean much. People of average intelligence (100 +/-) would actually be expected to do rather well for themselves. You don't compare individuals you look at the average and that is where the trend em…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:04 PM
1

Sure if by tell you mean give them feedback what was implied there was enforce upon them. Usually there is no policy made regarding female facial hair because it is so rare that most employers simply wouldn't have a woman who needed it. As I had stated before I have no issue with women who have a visible mustache (not the bumfluff stuff you can only see against the sun that basically every human has) would be reprimanded and required to shave. Since the OP indicated that he was in law enforcemen…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:57 PM
2

IQ is about the best predictor people have of life success when you look at educational attainment, job attainment and income. Wealth is a different issue and ability to earn is somewhat overshadowed by propensity to be 'conscientious'. The real question would be what is the average IQ of the top 100 chess players. Sadly that data doesn't and likely won't exist. The brain differ for subjects like math or specific tasks like spatial reasoning.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:41 PM
4

The chess one is tied to the difference in standard deviation of IQ leading to men being over-represented at the higher and lower tail ends and women clustering more around the mean. If I recall correctly at around 140 IQ the ratio is 2.5 men to 1 woman and if you take this up to around 160 this ratio increases to something like 20:1. (Don't remember the exact figures but this is ballpark what they were) You could also use running or throwing as good examples. The actual differences in the 'aver…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:51 AM
1

If the company wants to hire women with short hair sure. Most companies or occupations don't. You the random dude on the internet who thinks he has the right to tell people how to run their enterprises however doesn't have that right. What you can do is take your business elsewhere and only eat at dirty hippie restaurants where neither the men nor the women ever shave/groom or you could just go to a normal shop here reasonable amounts of facial hair and long hair on men are permitted.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:44 AM
1

I'm not ideologically consumed with men's right stuff. If you don't like it don't sign up for the job. I don't even like clean shaven as a look and I dislike uniforms (beyond name tags or one identifiable feature) but I don't get deeply upset or misconstrue it as some human rights issue akin to forced disfigurement. I can be a condescending piece of shit but I usually don't initiate it.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:52 PM
1

If an employer demands breast implants then you wouldn't sign up for that unless you already had them assuming you were sane or didn't want the employer to subsidize them somehow. Also as far as I know no such job sexist not that they should be banned. Surgical operation is pretty different from body hair removal. I mean you could go the traditional way and enjoy a good shave or just buy one of those fancy modern shavers which might be amazing or just totally suck dick. A haircut or other forms …
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:27 PM
1

Well basic things like lack of growths, easiness to clean, access to the skin etc. There are actually a bunch of scientists who theorize that people lost their body hair because we were so poor at grooming (although this has somewhat lost tracking and fallen out of favour if I'm up to speed). There are downsides to a beard. Sure they won't kill you but think about it this way. Have you noticed that you hair actually gets rather filthy before your skin does and how it is actually notably easier t…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:20 PM
0

I'm sure it does. Washing doesn't offer that much of an advantage either. Supposedly your body does it's thing after 2 weeks or so (assuming you 'air out'; so skinny jeans won't work but a sash 'manspreading' before the TV might do the trick). My friends and I tested this way back. We had a pact we couldn't shower unless someone sent us to the shower because they got too smelly or gross. most of us made it 3-4 weeks. It was real gross but interesting nonetheless and in a strange but really gross…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:51 PM
1

Those are horrible. I'd stash a razor at work I guess. Just in case. Maybe to rub it in make a point for coming in early and shaving (assuming you get the bad rep). It's all the more fun when you can rub something you hate into someone else's wounds but actually improve yourself (not as a being just specific to you job etc.) in doing so.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:47 PM
1

What are you a feminist?! :P /s
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:41 PM
1

I don't think the fact that they get away with it is excusable. I guess I'd keep a shaver at work. Not saying it isn't a chore don't get me wrong but it's like body odour some people are just 'less lucky'. Single razor blades are probably unacceptable unless its the oldschool free razor. The thing right under "Berkeley" once you learn to use it an in your hands isn't that bad: https://cdn0.rubylane.com/shops/charmingandcheap/12212.9L.jpg?74 .
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:41 PM
1

Sure. You can keep your beard. I have no issue with that. In fact I am a fan of beards. If an employer doesn't wish to hire you with a full thick beard fuck them and find another employer. You shouldn't be forcing him to hire people with beards (although I personally think beards have a homey feel and actually work to create positive interactions; at least that is my experience assuming you don't have food/spit caught in 'em).
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:36 PM
0

You can strip excess body hair with little to no harm (besides energy/time). You can't do that with your microbial biome. In fact it would likely kill you (although this is largely your internal one since your skin still poses an 'impenetrable' layer to most things that might otherwise kill/harm you. Doesn't address the fact that unless you put effort into controlling both and their side effects that they will become very, very unpleasant to the point where employers might fire you and most peop…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:34 PM
32

This is insane.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:47 PM
17

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_records_in_weightlifting Well that was easy enough. And because I'm a dick and like to rub it in: https://aeon.co/essays/why-are-only-two-of-the-world-s-top-100-chess-players-women
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:45 PM
23

No, see that would be consistent. Here take your daily dose of cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:42 PM
2

2600 shitting products. You're fucking gross. That's half a piece of toilet paper per dump. /s
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:41 PM
5

Yep. Now to the hard part. Getting govt. to give up their guns and a gynocentric society to explain to women that from hence forth there will be no more free handouts.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:39 PM
3

I'd want nothing to do with 'progressivism'. I think using that term is pretty dangerous. If it is strictly the way you define it I would consider myself a downtrodden progressive MRA who doesn't see much hope for an 'egalitarian' future. I won't give up on the notion but I think and our civilization will likely be replaced or outcompeted by a traditionalist one. But I'll go down with my ship I guess. I'm an individualist.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:37 PM
1

Well you deleted the previous comment so I guess this is a two part response. Your unique smell is pretty established (between our friends we can tell quite a few people apart believe it or not). You have pheromones bacteria makeups unique to you etc. Also showering daily with soaps is pretty inhuman. They're an invention of the last 10,000 or so years and before that showering would likely depend on finding a water source that you don't need otherwise which would've been something many humans w…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:31 PM
1

The biome that causes you particular smell is literally part of your being and scientists are beginning to become aware of how important the bacteria you house are to you and how they can differ between people. I don't recall many women with beards. I also know tons of jobs that have women tie their hair up and men do the same. See basically any job a kitchen.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:14 PM
6

Cutting you hair is the same as a uniform. It is a look. You aren't removing an intricate part of your being. It's excess hair. You try and make it sound like it's amputating limbs. Why don't we simply never shave or cut our hair then? I mean my stench is also part of my natural self. Why should I shower? Natural me just smell like a barn animal.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:35 PM
5

Specific to the business/occupation. One company will want you to have a uniform, another won't. One might want you to keep you hard cut or tied, another won't. One will want you to keep body hair under control, another won't. Etc. You pick where you want to work and they want people who are comfortable or OK with their dress & grooming demands. Not that I am endorsing uniforms or like them but I see their value even as someone who dislikes them.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:12 PM
5

Seems spot on.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:55 PM
7

I think it is fair to expect women with mustaches to keep them shaved as well. My guess is the reason that isn't implemented (or more likely enforced) is because we know a woman with a mustache isn't happy to have it and being the one to mention it is rough. Not that it is an excuse -standards should be standards- but it might be an explanation.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:55 PM
12

I do think it is reasonable to require a specific standard of grooming on the job. I know someone similar to you through family who would shave every day always and still looked like he had a beard all the time. I guess count your blessings. You can grow an extremely full beard. I also know men who can't/don't grow a beard who wish they could grow one slowly. This is just one of those cases where you got 'unlucky' or 'lucky' depending on how you view it. Unlucky since you're a man who grows a be…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:44 PM
10

All men -> EBIL RAPIZTZ All women -> HELPLESS VICTIMS & ANGELS EKWALUHTEE
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:16 AM
1

Also a very good observation. Women do account for the majority of household and consumer spending so it does make sense to capitalize on that willingness to spend.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:37 AM
1

They haven't quite legitimized that. Don't give them ideas you mad man! Although I'm sure you could find a few cases where this excuse has been used and some where it might have held up (although I'm still hoping there wouldn't be any).
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:37 AM
2

That's pretty rare :P I'm guessing you're both lightweights, not that it is a bad thing. I tried to go through the couples I knew that lasted more than a week or two and every one I knew had engaged in something like this multiple times. Of course it isn't everyone but the majority. I'm fairly certain you're safe but it is a shame that in the back of people's heads a thought like this ends up going off.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:35 AM
1

I agree that different pigments can vary significantly but in the case of those products it isn't likely to explain any more than a few cents since the graphic design is almost identical and its a crate of 20xUS$15. On US$ 300 the colour will have a fairly minor impact.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:33 AM
1

Luckily this isn't the case under the law in most Western nations but the public sentiment has definitely echoed this for a while with the media smear campaigns and the witch hunts before any verdicts are made.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:31 AM
1

Unless you are buying at budget level any such issues are largely unrelated to the price. If you're buying 'the cheapest thing' its likely going to look that way since they'll try save in all areas. That's fine and even desirable. I also don't find that the cheapest large packet shampoo/soap is labelled by sex since they probably specifically try to cover both markets. If you don't give a shit what shampoo you're buying you're not going to give a shit if its labelled men/women/kids. Some impact …
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:30 AM
27

The crazy thing is there is a reason they are normalizing this flawed logic. This way they will actually turn almost every man into a rapist. Who hasn't had sex with an intimate partner be it girlfriend or fuckbuddy while you were both intoxicated or while she was intoxicated. Think about it. With this reasoning every marriage or relationship effectively becomes a guarantee that the man can be painted as a rapist. The only way to avoid this would be to celibate or have a partner that never drink…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:01 PM
1

I don't know the answer to that question. I know that after 5 years, it doesn't matter. You are the father regardless of what the DNA says. That's shocking. Thanks for the previous info. Maybe someone else reads what I wrote and has the answer but I'd guess that's probably unlikely.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:13 PM
31

'The pink tax' has been debunked on several occasions. It comes down to the fact that usually the products while they look similar are different. An example is the number of ingredients in male vs. female shampoo. It would be very likely that the ingredients in a vitamin tablet marketed to women vs. men would also be different. Other factors often include the additional marketing costs, potentially stocking costs, packaging (although in this case they do look very similar barring colour) and the…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:24 PM
1

Dad body dolls would be fine. I personally am worried and suspect this is a slippery slope to 400 pound Barbies and 600 pound Kens. Normally slippery slopes are a fallacy but the SJW types have pretty much followed through on everything the religious right predicted with it initially being gay rights and now having progressed to denigrating straight people + encouraging transgenderism + advocating for pedophilia; the only thing missing is them advocating for beastiality.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:14 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:10 PM
1

So for example if you wish to stop making child care payments for a child you suspect isn't yours would this be a sufficient reason to be get a paternity test? That sounds like it would be establishing or disputing parentage but of course you'd actually need to get a court order to be permitted to do it unlike in other places.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:10 PM
1

In regards to you final point I think the fact that women tend to be more susceptible to social pressure and alienation is a significant part of it. There's definitely an element of if you're not a feminist you're not a woman but instead an apostate in modern feminism. The demands that you must comply with to be part of the 'in group' do shift but on average are ever increasing.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:08 PM
1

I'm an individualist. I believe in equality of opportunity but absolutely oppose forced equality of outcome or any other Marxist meddling where you give people points for X and take away points for Y. The danger is when people think that equal opportunity would ever result in equal outcomes and then because it doesn't begin to try and 'fix' a normal process. There are some great videos on YouTube about this subject from Thomas Sowell from 30-40 years ago.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:45 AM
3

Cato the Elder said this very succinctly more than 2000 years ago. "If you let women become your equals, they will be your masters." You explanation is helpful in explaining the nothing to someone not familiar with the idea. Just thought you'd like that quote.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:41 AM
1

That's a decent observation. If they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all. However I actually see no issue in the underlying thing happening. I think it makes sense that men buy things men like and pay more for them. I mean I could go with a plain cheap orange razor (as could women) or I could pay more for a sleek black and silver one. I know I prefer the black and silver one so I am happy to pay more for it. The same would apply to women and women's products. There's a r…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:26 AM
4

Holy shit... just cuck my shit up fam. Anyone got a link to an official French law domain that has this law cited in 2 languages?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:16 AM
2

That is an interesting way to look at it. So essentially an age old variation of the weak herd together to force the strong to do as they please. On the surface you'd think it makes more sense to advocate 'more for me' but then the herd would fracture and it would likely result in no one getting anything. Interesting how much that sounds like something out of Marxist fanfic but that does very much line up with female voting behaviour.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:59 AM
2

This stuff exists. LOL.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:55 AM
1

I mean that was what Barbie and Ken were originally. Then again I guess they've expanded the lineup so much that adding another variant isn't really a big deal at this point. Nonetheless man-buns are an awful hipster thing and I worry that the dad-bod doll will eventually lead to the morbidly obese fat-shaming is evil doll but to be fair that is me skipping over a few steps that don't necessarily have to follow.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:48 AM
5

I guess jail time is a hotel?!
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:05 AM
2

The whole ridiculous being progressive and anti-fat-shaming attitude. Maybe it was the way the poster phrased it but that doesn't change much behind it. It'd be like morbidly obese man the super hero or something comparable. It fundamentally inverts the premise which can be great for a laugh or two but beyond that is quickly seen through.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:00 AM
1

Dammit. People should've voted for $hillary so we could've had our nuclear holocaust before this happened.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:13 PM
8

There have been studies that show women have a notably higher in group preference than men though which would disprove your premise. The premise does make sense. Men that don't like women pretty much won't reproduce as much as men who do so over time the trait to favour women became stronger. On the other hand for women this selective pressure wasn't as present and to be fair cavemen were likely dangerous (I at least don't think getting into a loud fighting match with them would be a wise idea a…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:28 PM
1

That's fine. Heaps of girls don't like dicks. Get over it, deal with it or abstain.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:24 PM
2

You read the first half of the first line and then you get angry and then you read the rest and realize it's all sarcasm but you still get angry because you realize this is the logic people apply to boys.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:24 PM
331

The kinda police horse you know got yo' back.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/17 09:21 PM
2

Active resistance doesn't necessarily require you to get in a shootout with the state's henchmen (although if 20% of the population would do that the problem would be settled in about 2 hours). I do believe this is a war that can be fought on all fronts but if you're not actively resisting you're likely more a pacifist than a follower of the NAP (at least in action as opposed to in principle). I'm going to head off but I think we're pretty much in agreement about every major topic (not that it w…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:14 PM
1

Off course, governments fear armed people more then anything else in the universe. Now they also fear cash money, cryptocurrencies and gold. Very apt observation. I have to agree with you wholly but I'd like to add a metal backed currency system as well since this has all but been abandoned in favour of fiat currency because it lets you print money to appease the populous. I do tend to hold that a victimless crime isn't a crime (barring some exception where some is bound to be a few hundred uniq…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:07 PM
1

You could actually vote away such a system and even a republic could choose to dissolve itself. Historically speaking there are even dictatorships and monarchies that have relinquished control (although to be fair usually to democracies which aren't necessarily less tyrannical). If you choose to take no part in such a system that is of course your choice but I don't think it brings about any change unless you actively propose and work on alternatives (beyond the extremes of self-sacrifice you ha…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:01 PM
1

I falsely assumed you'd be in nation that has acceptable gun laws since I find making such an argument without those provisions isn't really possible since the NAP isn't pacifism which requires that the participant is armed in order to defend himself. that I never agreed to join. Agreed however coming over to move would count as agreement. Finally it doesn't actually change the reality that while your interpretation is very innocuous and would result in no harm someone else deciding to ignore th…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:45 PM
2

You live in one of but a very few nations (I'm sure one of two others do qualify) where you might even have the means to defend yourself from the radicals or the state. You cannot follow the NAP and initiate violence (although there could be an argument to be had here I'll ignore it) but restricting and keeping an extremely observant eye on the movement of people is entirely in line with it. Anything else is actually an act of aggression upon your and your fellow countrymen's rights (unless ther…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:24 PM
2

I'd say I follow the NAP or am happy to make steps towards it until I see it doesn't work (although I don't see that becoming easier these days). The issue is extremists definitely don't follow the NAP so you either act or get acted upon. Acting when a 'truck of peace' hits you sadly doesn't work very well. Something like the NAP works just fine so long as everyone agrees to follow it. The moment people don't (which is the majority of people) it loses any authority sadly.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:36 PM
5

We could get into a argument over the fact that far too many people who are labeled moderate Muslims actually hold extremists beliefs and that these numbers come in at somewhere around 600 million people but that would be pointless since I am actually referring to the genuine extremists. Not following laws simply because 'MUH FEELZ' is just as dangerous as following laws simply because 'MUH FEELZ'. The argument you made can be made in reverse. Not to say that a bunch of laws aren't actually acts…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:24 PM
4

I believe the distinction here is that both reject any sort of 'natural order'. The far-lefists reject the natural order of biology. The Islamists reject the natural order in favour of their own (arbitrary) theological convictions. In both cases it is a deep-seeded belief in ideology that governs their thought and thereby shapes the conclusions they come to.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:02 PM
31

Feminist first, man second. The parallels between the far-left and Islamism are hilarious. They're also Muslims first and Britons/Americans/French/Syrian/Iraqi/etc. second.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:30 AM
1

I assume the same rules to public filming should apply even when in the nude. Namely you are allowed to be filmed so long as no specific focus is drawn to you. This would violate that. However at the same time if they are punished any more seriously than someone who might do this to a normal girl on the beach who is wearing clothing then that is a double standard. Pretty sure standard policy would be to delete the video and inform them of how such things aren't legal.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:56 AM
1

SAVAGE
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:53 AM
44

Because if they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:48 AM
4

I don't see any comment either.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:36 PM
7

THIS IS EVIDENCE OF MISOGYNY. WHY AREN'T FATHERS DENIGRATED WHILE MOTHERS ARE WORSHIPED. On that the dates for fathers day really vary a lot by country although if you're in the US or Western Europe they should be similar.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:34 PM
1

We need Big Welfare so we don't need men to raise kids. OMG the kids aren't raising themselves and we can't do it. I despise this stuff. I think what these guys are doing is a very valuable service but that first half of the interview with the mum. Also think it is a shame that this seems to be exclusive to black boys since in the UK the least likely to succeed are actually white boys from poor backgrounds (I'll assume a lot of the boys featured in this video come from poor backgrounds). Speakin…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:32 PM
11

What's due process when you got a feminist witch hunt.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:26 PM
13

SPICY AS FUCK
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:54 PM
3

Third-wave feminists telling me how people of my gender aren't sexually assaulted but the aggressors while actively arguing the opposite because another friend of mine has been sexually assaulted by a woman before. Not to mention the many precarious situations I have found myself in at times which had I been female would most definitely have been considered rape by not only a group of people at a dinner table but also a jury (at least if they didn't hold the notion that men cannot be raped)*. *N…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:27 PM
2

Well if we're basing it on 'biology' that is simply put the case. A stronger man would have the 'right' (if you can even misconstrue something argued from biology that) to rape a weaker man... unless of course he is more skilled in combat, better armed or has sufficient support to prevent this. But in a 'vacuum' it would follow and those same arguments used to defend the weaker man could be applied to women so it is the same case. The difference being 95-99.8% of healthy men who get basic daily …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:16 PM
1

Well played my man. Well played. This is exactly the kind of triggering they need :P
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:08 PM
4

But they are perfect illustrations of how an appeal to biology isn't a great basis. Men get no say in reproduction 'cuz biology' then women get no say in rape 'cuz biology' is actually a fairly comparable standpoint. Then again there are of course many variations of this you could use that are a lot less inflammatory but often times taking an argument to the extreme is one of the best ways to disprove that fallacious reasoning behind it.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:04 PM
7

I'm surprised you aren't pre-banned for being part of this sub-Reddit :P But I do think you are right that would get you banned. I guess you could use a throwaway to make the point.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:59 PM
13

Use their logic against them. Women shouldn't get equal rights because biology. That should illustrate how that line of thought doesn't hold up or work in their favour. Get creative with examples. Men are stronger so if they can rape they should be entitled to it because biology. Men are stronger so if they can they should be entitled to beat, torture or murder women because biology. Men are stronger and faster so women should not compete in sport because even the best women are usually just som…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:03 AM
1

IT'S EKWALUHTEE Where deh wimins get everything and the men get castrated to or killed* *Unless they are 6'5" with 10+ inch penises and an 8 pack :P
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:15 PM
6

Ever been walking through a part of town that is gay. Welcome; it's no better. But hey here's the real killer. That's all rude and but consider how many men have never ever been talked to or propositioned. Will we sympathize with them and force women to approach and also sexually engage with them? Or will we just accept that girls get hit on by drunk horny guys who have little to no game and think leering or whistling gets them laid? The funny thing is feminists actually want more 'Pick Up Artis…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:13 PM
1

No one can have it all. Where does the notion come from that you can have it all? Want a family? That will cost you. Want a career? That will cost you. You can manage to juggle a few major desires and stay on par on them but you definitely CANNOT have it all. At best you can have something like 3-5 really big things.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 06:59 PM
1

It is also worth noting that much of Western European attitudes are built upon the Frankfurt school of thought which very much has ties to Marxism and is essentially neo-Marxist thought. This is why many people will call European nations 'socialist' because it all grows on the same heap. It is a very perverse interpretation that throws out the sensible parts of base -> superstructure in favour of a relativist approach (which I presume can only come from postmodernist interpretations) where someh…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:57 PM
1

In regards to university prices that is going to be due to the long ignored cost of the universities. This has been a trend for a while. Germany and France have had similar things in the past. Generally it is just recouping some of the cost usually with a minor fee (around 10% of the cost). I think there is some sense in it and I think the value of higher education was in part lost when the notion that everyone 'must' go became common place especially if you consider degrees that aren't of much …
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:43 PM
1

I don't know of any compasses that put Obama or Clinton on the left. That one is definitely disingenuous. The far right has little to no taxation. This is true even if you go back in history to the time when right meant monarchy/theocracy. Usually monarchs charged very tame sums by modern standards and even Islamic theocracy only charged the dhimmis 20% which by today's standards is often a lower middle-class rate of taxation. To be as far right as Macron is there you would need to be effectivel…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:09 AM
1

Been a while since I can say I have read something from the left of the political spectrum I can largely agree with. Pinning it necessarily on neo-liberalism is in my opinion an incorrect diagnosis since it along with a lot of government and media has been hijacked by cronies. Nice to see some people on the left are sane. Sadly the political compasses from that site are way out of whack. A test that puts a a man who is endorsed by the communist party and proposes a 100% tax on those earning more…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:39 AM
1

Welfare states are decidedly socially democratic and social democracy is left centered. Some Western European countries take this to the extreme so they get to be more than center left but since they are the driving force behind the EU they influence it a lot more therefore my statements. You are the one who is confusing terms. Left wing doesn't mean socialism. Socialism is on the left politically speaking but so are many other things although in general it progresses as such: Liberalism -> Soci…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:04 PM
1

Not at all. I'm using socialist policies and I'm well aware of how social democracies have elements of capitalism and strong welfare elements so they would feature aspects people would usually attribute to those two schools of thought.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:53 PM
1

Nope. Alex Jones is amusing to laugh at and even more so when he is right or when his insane predictions are actually less 'severe' than reality -> see the frogs are gay when it is actually 70% of the frogs are chemically castrated and 10% go on to become actual females. Literally hilarious. Reality makes Alex Jones seem 'too reserved' in his predictions. In regards to the media this isn't an unfair prediction. 90% of US media is owned by 6 companies and Google and FaceBook have something around…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:52 PM
1

Don't know if edits show up in the inbox so I'll add this message to point out that the previous message in this thread was edited. I'll also copy paste the edit to save you the trouble of navigating to the thread. Europe is definitely not right wing? Are you delusional. Europe is significantly left. As is it is further left than center left. Look at France. The only candidate that was actually right of center and that only around as right as the average Western European nation is left wing was …
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:29 PM
1

Europe is definitely not right wing? Are you delusional. Europe is significantly left. As is it is further left than center left. Look at France. The only candidate that was actually right of center and that only around as right as the average Western European nation is left wing was Fillon. But yes I agree Europe is partially capitalist (as you had acknowledged it's mainly social democracies which generally tend to have similar tenants to capitalism - however read the second part of the first s…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:23 PM
1

A top down superstate with unaccountable governance is decided USSR. Did you do history 101? They are fining countries that fail to privatize and that is because they are trying to get the control out of local government hands. Generally privatization is good there are hundreds of case studies and this is why private utilities exist and are usually the staple. Just because neo-liberalism has been coopted by billionaires who wish to use it to push globalism and are all heavy believers of socialis…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:19 PM
1

Look at the media moguls (both online and mainstream media) and the Open Society foundation. They are all hyperleftist and they are essentially the ones that 'control discourse'.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:15 PM
1

How do you know if you're banned? It is just if you go to the sub, open a thread and try to comment but there is no comment box? Or do you need to subscribe, wait a day then check?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/17 12:36 PM
2

In before Google stealth edits the definition of bigotry so that it overtly states a bigot can only be a person who is not a leftist/SJW.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/17 12:32 PM
1

Social democracy was created as a stepping stone to socialism which was itself conceived as the final step before communism. Literally the second paragraph on the Wikipedia page: "Social democracy originated as a political ideology that advocated an evolutionary and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism using established political processes in contrast to the revolutionary approach to transition associated with orthodox Marxism." At times I wish EU citizens weren't completely brainwas…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:09 PM
1

They have. The EUSSR is effectively a top down bureaucracy where unelected leaders are the only people who can make laws. This is exactly what the political and elite want and it is why they are flooding the West with unassimilable immigrants because they are far more likely to be Welfare dependent and therefore vote for bigger govt. and because they will destabilize the nations they go to which allows said govt. to advocate for a police/surveillance state. Coming from an EU citizen who was reje…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:05 PM
1

Economists are the ones that make the arguments and not oligarchs. The oligarchs are arguing for socialism because socialism actually destroys economies, detriments the poor and makes it easier for the wealthy to then rehire cheap labour but more importantly buy up stuff at rock bottom prices. The rich get out and diversify before a crash and then are the ones to reap the gains and socialism inevitably leads in economic downturns and uncertainty. It also makes controlling the economy much easier…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:01 PM
5

I am not pro-migration but this is the kind of case that should occur more commonly. This would make me proud -in a sparse time- in the EU. Sadly 99.98% aren't like this.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:44 AM
1

I'm not a socialist and I know social democracy was conceived as a stepping stone to socialism so I tread weary. If the govt. could stay out of the markets besides human rights violations I might actually acquire some affinity. But history has taught me else-wise. The very worst things have been governments. Things that leave you ill on a physical level. I am sick thinking of the times I witnessed and absorbed it.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:33 AM
1

I do not live in the US or the EU. I simply observe their systems from a vantage point.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:29 AM
1

Went back to in the 80s? The govt. has been meddling more in the economy ever since the great depression. It would be a steady trend of Keynesian economics. Have you looked at bailouts and the money supply. Have fun. The way you define boom/bust capitalism is inherently incorrect. Either it didn't exist in the 1800s when govt. expenditure and Keynesian politics weren't a giant thing or it only exists since the the central bank tries to 'fix' the economy.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:00 PM
2

Nordic countries faired well because they have very highly developed economies less susceptible to economic shock. This is why developing nations particularly commodity exporters are hit so hard by economic downturns. China fudges its GDP so those numbers national propaganda and even figures in China acknowledge this not to mention the billions of debt they created and gave to state owned enterprises incapable of repatriating the loans to bolster GDP. However they and Russia have been clever on …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:57 PM
1

Actually the largest leap in the improvement of the lives of workers was Ford reducing the work day from 10 to 8 hours and doubling wages to essentially 'create' the 'modern middle class'. Socialism and those antics gave you a 10 hour work week but that pales in comparison.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:55 PM
-1

That first statement sounded like the average leftist. The gold standard was lifted long before then. Calling Bretton Woods a gold standard would be like calling a 10% (I forget the exact figure but I believe it dipped to 1-4% backing compared to the currencies it was backing; but don't quote me here) guarantee on a bank account a guarantee for the bank account although to be fair a 10% guarantee for many of the worlds 'accounts' did have a notable stabilizing force as one might suspect. Althoug…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:54 PM
0

Then try not to sound like them (also it's a pretty safe bet to assume anyone you're talking to on Reddit is probably a leftist, statistically speaking). Calling it boom/bust capitalism as though that isn't a colloquial name given to the business cycle a somewhat 'free market' goes through -and there are several proposed ones-. If you care about the middle class you'd hate Keynesian economics a lot more since that robs the middle class of their wealth through inflation because the govt. falsely …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:28 PM
1

Neoliberals are importing cheap labour. Boom/bust capitalism isn't even a thing. You act like it is a man made event. It is just the way markets operate if left alone. There will be times of greater or lesser economic activity. It never aimed for a middle class of 10% and only 10% of the world wasn't living in destitute poverty in 1900. If you look at that figure now you'll see how capitalism even when heavily hampered by governments has managed to life 80% of the people out of poverty. The midd…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:15 PM
1

Hate speech! Silence it! We must maintain the narrative that men are literally worse than Satan... or are they Satan for the militant atheist left?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:56 AM
1

It isn't reversing the problem. As you highlighted. The men alive today are innocent. It is simply persecution if they engage in it. Reversing it would be bringing those men that according to them oppressed women back and then oppressing them. I'd argue in many ways men weren't evil and also had it rough. The past was a shitty place for everyone and almost no one had their 'human rights'. But feminists love turning this into a dick measuring contest.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:53 AM
2

Economic growth is slow because there is low labour force participation, a low birth rate and excess govt. draining funds. The boom/bust cycle isn't an issue and you'll see that economies do well when left to their own devices. For something a leftist might understand. Just because one or two years are colder than the one before that doesn't 'debunk' global warming. The trend remains upwards but at times this trend will slow and in some rare cases even reverse although these are almost always du…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:51 AM
1

To the SJW radfem types this is a victory. They want men dead. They outright state it themselves.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:20 PM
1

I guess domestic violence is funny to the permanently offended so long as it is 'against the sex that deserves to be beaten'. Hypocrites.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:17 PM
1

A classic case of: "If they didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all."
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:16 PM
1

I think the answer is fairly obvious. I wouldn't want to be with someone who advocates superiority either way. If you resent one sex purely for being that sex I see serious problems in a cross-sex relationship. Dating these women is in my opinion a mistake. Don't encourage their behaviour. Use your own say in the sexual market place to deny them a mate. That way they either have to change their supremacist and sexist ways or their genes will slowly be weeded out.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:15 PM
3

Male suicide is a serious issue. I don't think this will help address it but I also don't know how we might approach it. I know so many guys who are amazingly off and still have these thoughts creep up on them. What's more concerning is they tend to be impulsive and 'seize the moment'.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:37 AM
2

What about his mind. I can actually see a world where her encouragement was 'consensual' and desired.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:36 AM
1

What timeline am I in?! Tumblr is going to fight by our side in the struggle to grant men human rights. I mean, I'm fine with that but I'm going to need to do 50 tabs of acid to think this is real.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:34 AM
13

Doesn't feminist imply that already. The definition is wholly one-sided and only concerns itself wit the equality of 'the fairer sex'.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:32 AM
1

I don't endorse this: 'You need to lose a bit of weight.' This other time they were slapping me. I felt like a piece of meat.' For either sex but there are of course careers where physical form is the career and as such what is perceived as personal injury is nothing more than sub-par work. I also think my main issue is with the notion that we should not be allowed to objectify people. We are still animals. There are very basal urges that drive us and desires that have been shown to hold for bli…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:20 AM
1

I think it is far minutia. Now I am not particularly familiar with African cultures but I assume they are somewhat similar and you would see something along the lines I have described. If you don't it might be that in Africa people have largely had 'plenty' (at least in terms of environment this is accurate) and as such didn't necessarily evolve obesity as a status signal (although anecdotal recollections make me think the opposite). Now obviously don't take this as truth but for some reason lar…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:11 AM
21

A scrawny, short Puerto Rican is now the Uebermensch?! Man the Nazi's standards have dropped low. You can tell they're struggling to keep their faux movement alive. On that though good on Laci and Chris for being able to see past their initial personas. Not that I particularly like her but credit where credit is due. Sometimes it's about seeing your 'bitterest enemy' as a person.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:54 AM
6

This is one of the more terrifying bit so legislation to come out. I believe Australia is pushing for something similar. While I am all for empowering individuals many don't meet the standards. I know I did and a few of my friends did but the majority of my peers didn't reach adulthood until past 18. I think as a parent you should never alienate a child but some unaccountable govt. body seems so much worse. Some kids are out of control. Some kids need discipline. Some kids will resent their pare…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:50 AM
1

They absolutely were. People are still skinny shamed. Travel outside 'the West'. Saying you look thin was until 20 years ago a harsh insult and until now is not acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:47 AM
2

In the past being over-weight was a symbol of status and the thin were essentially 'shamed' although they weren't since 98%+ were that way. These days the roles have reversed.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:35 AM
2

It's been around forever and it establishes a social pecking order. That is some biological truth. I'm not condoning it it's just unavoidable.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:22 AM
36

First time I figured it out without internet. I'll admit it took a bit of 'fuck it I'll try it' and way longer than it should have but it is definitely within the realm of the average human being.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 06:48 PM
9

Changing a flat tire isn't that hard. The first time it happened to me I figured the whole thing out on my own. I'd never ever done it before or seen it done. It took a bit of 'go get 'em' attitude and 20 minutes longer than it should have but it worked.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 06:47 PM
2

I can't see how he might be shamed though. He is objectively speaking attractive. I do think his is what I discussed and not what you are discussing. I can sympathize with severely overweight people not wishing to be made fun or of humiliated at every circumstance (although I don't necessarily believe this shame is non-beneficial). The main issue I have with any such notion is the fact that it is literal 101 SJW politics. People should and must have freedom of expression. This will inevitably le…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:38 PM
10

I wish we could just leave the notion of body shaming or objectification behind instead of extending it to both genders. The reality is people will of course judge you for your physical state. It is human nature. We are evolutionarily hardwired to seek out attractive mates. The physical body makes up part of what a mate is. This doesn't mean we shouldn't value character or that we should require people to fulfill some impossible ideal but the notion that 'looks don't matter' is as flawed as the …
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:56 PM
-5

ROFL. Can I get a B Can I get a T Can I get an F Can I get an O
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:17 PM
2

The dog looks health, well fed and well groomed and doesn't appear to have any injuries. Sounds like shes making that up. Some dogs just have 'sad faces'. Other dogs have evolved permanent puppy dog eyes because it makes people melt and give them everything.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:35 PM
11

Yes. Exactly. You should never let another person walk all over you in a relationship. I'd send her prepared divorce papers as a photo at that moment. I can be a little extreme but I am entirely with you on the sentiment. You don't use that as a bargaining chip and if you do then your relationship will end dysfunctional.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:32 PM
5

Not on systems like the PS4. Those markets are still massively dominated by men. Overall there are more female gamers than male gamers but that comes from the fact that the mobile gaming market is the vast majority of the gaming market and in more casual/cute games women are over-represented.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:30 PM
5

I'd message her photos of prepared divorce papers. Someone who believes they have the right to ban you from doing what you please and disposes of your property without your consent isn't a person you should be with. I can only see this getting worse. If she plays hardball play back. Even if you weren't planning to go through with it you can always go back to groveling at her feet afterwards. I'd give the same advice to a female who's boyfriend is banning her from going to clubs to dance or some …
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:27 PM
3

That piece of shit should be tried and the cases in which the evidence would overturn decisions reopened. Sadly I am very skeptical those two things will happen.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:18 AM
1

Point 1: They are asking. Point 2: No direct threats to self determination are made. Point 3: The tone is laid back and not assertive. Point 4: It's a pretty poor comparison since lets have sex is pretty different to -even if the person were ecstatic about it- let's play out a rather realistic analogue of rape/sexual assault. Comparing vanilla to rape fantasies which even people in the BDSM community are cautious about fulfilling is like comparing a lap dog to a pack of wolves; the first one is …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:50 AM
3

When I find something on my body I don't like I either try and change it depending on how much I dislike it or deal with having it. I don't have a giant cry about it and try and make the world pay for the fact that I didn't win every single aspect of the genetic lottery down to perfect pinky toes.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:12 PM
1

That has literally nothing to do with anything. Also shitty cartoons aren't an argument. Nor was I making any claims regarding how much sex the average man or woman desire or get nor how much the hypothetical characters do. I'd recommend conceding you were wrong but since I know you I expect you to continue to double down the same way you won't even concede that babies cannot consent and outright state it and instead take some ridiculous path around that notion. It's funny you're so wrapped up i…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:15 PM
9

Yep. Absolute and complete disregard for the human being as a human being and a inhuman ability to see them merely as a test. Then the hubris to make ones claims on a basis of one subject and a trial period that is shorter than most serious drugs. It's actually a really dark and messed up story. I watched a documentary on it a while back. It wasn't too long but you really got a grasp on how this one decision destroyed this man and his life ultimately ending in a horrible suicide. What is most vi…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:56 PM
1

Also what is sexually revealing for men? I mean full junk? That's pretty much guaranteed to get you an R or XXX rating. Let's see some stats accounting for male nipple exposure. Pretty sure that breaks this in a heartbeat. You really can't please feminists. No nude women and it's patriarchy repressing female sexuality. Too many nude women and it's patriarchy sexualizing females. Funny how just about every women's magazine has tons of girls in revealing clothing. Must be evil patriarchy as well. …
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:06 PM
12

Chop off his balls and dick and take him to a surgeon to create an artificial vagina at 2-4 because it is "his choice" and then when he shoots himself because he doesn't identify with his new gender ignore those findings and continue peddling gender theory? How'd I do. PS: There is a real case that is essentially what I outlined. If memory serves me correctly the guy who did the study was one of the leading scholars on the whole gender is just a social construct side of the argument and happily …
/r/MensRights02/06/17 03:56 PM
1

Then she wouldn't report it and they'd fuck and it'd be consensual although they'd probably both get hit up for some public decency charge. However if another woman took issue with it she would be in her right to do so and it wouldn't be unreasonable.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 03:07 PM
1

I specifically had follow you and pin in there to make it threatening. I literally put it in there for that reason. It was phrased as a statement and not a question (both in tone and punctuation) and specifically included an action that limits someone's self-determination. Now whether this would specifically fulfill the legal definition is another question but it definitely fulfills the colloquial one which is akin to creeper. "Hey hun, wanna fuck." is crass and a bit weird given the situation b…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:18 AM
1

Because saying: "Hey sexy, I'ma pin you down and fuck you." might get you arrested. Saying 3 minutes of small talk and then: "I have a fantasy about having rough sex with someone where I completely immobilize them and take complete control. Do you find that arousing and would you like to participate." won't. I'd say that's a big part of it. The other of course is generally not being socially retarded. If you always act that way even if you're not a genuine threat and don't get into any trouble w…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:10 AM
1

There are no perfect strangers. That's a purely theoretical notion so concerning yourself with it in the real world is pointless. If we go with the hypothetical then it would rely 100% on the words that are being said and the body language being displayed. Generally you don't lead with 'I'm going to fuck you' that might get you into trouble. You lead with something more neutral. Under the law there are strict definitions that usually need to be met. If these are met then it might be one thing if…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:40 AM
1

Nope. That's by the words you're trying to put in my mouth. Honestly only the most extreme feminists are as dishonest in their discourse as you are, as militant in their adherence to definitions and finally as obtuse and unable to understand basic human interaction and that words often have colloquial definitions and different very strict ones under the law. That's before even considering that the statement might meet some of the legal criteria.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:32 AM
1

See again you take it out of context. Standing in line behind someone you've had no previous interaction with and then blurting sexual stuff at them is a little different to having spent an minutes eye-fucking each other which led to an evening partying, dancing and getting very physically intimate with one another. Just because some feminist might falsely use the notion of context doesn't actually negate it. Context is absolutely essential in human interaction. Fuck you man, I'ma kill you is ra…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:20 AM
1

That's another fair point. I haven't seen any info on the effective cost to insurers per mile of travel for men vs. women. Would be interesting enough to know. Since you mention that men probably also drive far more miles on large roads or highways which would be conducive to having less frequent but more severe accidents. The same way women probably do a lot of short distance small road travel that involves a lot of parking or shopping would be conducive to more minor scratches, bumps and scrap…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:09 AM
1

Not going to bother read your novella since you normally take things entirely out of context and are the male equivalent of a radfem. Situation matters for one, so if you say that out of the blue without any previous interaction that is entirely different to 'expanding on sexual tension'. Secondly it specifically stated pin. Pining someone is immobilizing them. You don't pull shit like that unless explicit consent is given the same way you don't tie someone to a heater in your basement unless ex…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:05 AM
3

Because that group actively fights to deny you your rights. Feel free to go hug a suicide bomber or ignore them. Something that is aggressively hostile must be attacked and neutralized as soon as possible. Ridicule and public shaming is an incredibly effective tool especially so against women since they tend to be more sensitive to it than men at least on average/statistically speaking. Radfems should be shamed and loudly laughed at and humiliated at every moment. Using their own weapons against…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:41 PM
1

I honestly think a big issue keeping black men from something like this could be the very serious single motherhood epidemic. I somehow suspect this also comes into play. Whether it is because you're only ever around female caretakers or whether you become hard and grow up faster than others. I also think a lot of the dynamics driving this cultural push back wouldn't be as present in black households. There are statistically far less dads that is lambasted by mum and works his ass off but just c…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:21 PM
1

No worries take your time. I think you're as included as the next guy or girl if you're black. Basically if you find the movement (it's definitely still in its infancy in terms of mainstream adoption) you might come, if you've never heard of it you probably won't. I think in may ways it really is a movement that spawned online from nerdy neckbeards congregating (as negative as that stereotype might be) in forums like this one where it grew since it definitely wouldn't be able to form in the main…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:09 PM
9

"But men always want sex and like totally are never not in the mood." It is a little concerning how pervasive this notion is. I didn't read the comments though so I can't really make any judgement on what is being said. Maybe it was just harmless stuff like: "AW MAH GAWD! What a hunk of a man! I need someone like this to marry me." On the other hand it might be: "Give me your address now! I'm gonna have your babies." which would qualify.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:55 PM
2

Nice to see a poster like this featured on something like the subway. I wonder if it is privately funded or a govt. initiative.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:52 PM
1

I have no issue with either. If some movie cinema wants to have a female only screening they should be allowed to. If some other cinema wants to have a male only screening they should be allowed to. The issue in my opinion is the hypocritical position. What's next. Are we going to ban people from nerd only clubs? Are we going to force basketball clubs to accept people who literally refuse to play basketball and would rather talk trading card games?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:49 PM
1

This is a good point. Normally when you are arguing with someone you aren't trying to convince them. The likelihood that you will get someone to change their views on something is fairly unlikely. You are trying to convince the audience.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:46 PM
1

You haven't offered me an example of how for example black men are excluded from the men's rights movement. Simply having an over-representation of people of any given race doesn't make something racist (this can be applied to most other arbitrary groupings). If it would basically every high education field would be yellow supremacist. Correlation is not causation. I'm pretty sure if there is a men's right event that specifically says no-XXXXXs then you'd have little issue finding condemnation f…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:45 PM
3

I'm surprised they haven't pre-banned everyone on this sub-Reddit for being part of the patriarchy boogieman.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:31 PM
2

The right to genital integrity.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:24 PM
3

...it would seem like he is so close to actually finding an acceptable answer. It shouldn't be done to non-consenting adults. Shame he literally went through the experience that made him realize 'hey doing this to kids is wrong' and then somehow ended on 'we should do it to babies (super small kids) instead'.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:22 PM
6

Well if there was a guy behind you as a girl and made remarks that are stereotypical of a sexual predator that would be an accurate observation and people would have no issue with it. The issue is radfems would claim him saying: "Excuse me miss." is predatory behavior instead of say: "Hey hun, how 'bout I follow you to your car and I pin you to the drivers seat." There definitely are 'stereotypical radical feminists' that will go on about sexism all the time for no reason and essentially just be…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:20 PM
1

Yep, there isn't anything inherently wrong with the notion of a white nation or a black nation or a yellow nation. Get triggered. It's pretty easy to demonstrate as well although that doesn't mean I'm for it. The issue comes from people attempting to reach this goal through violent means. If for example some imaginary city state or nation with a demographic split of 40% white, 30% black, 20% Hispanic and 10% Asian were to vote to peacefully split into 5 separate elements one that is exclusively …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:10 PM
1

I'm not sure if this was changed in the US but the difference in car insurance price is another good example. On average men tend to have more severe accidents and in total cost the car companies more so it is reasonable to charge them more. If it was changed that would just be another case of how one sided the concern over 'discrimination' (even though it isn't but it will obviously be framed as such) is.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:57 PM
0

That's how you'll lose adherents. The moment you turn this movement into an SJW safe space you're no better than nu-age feminism. If anything by your logic we need to educate more people of the dangers of Marxism (which we are indirectly doing by countering intersectionality and third-wave feminism which is neo-Marxist thought). White nationalism is harmless compared to the hammer and sickle (the KKK killed what 3,500 people vs. the 93,000,000 Communism did). Even Nazism only managed a yearly ki…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:55 PM
22

Women tend to cost insurance companies more than men... it's why they tend to be charged more especially later in life.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:47 PM
45

This is good. Their vitriol will only convert more people by highlighting just how acceptable it is to be awful to men and how it really is 'mainstream culture'.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:10 AM
9

Savage. A little part of me dies inside when comments like these aren't made on sub-Reddits prone to being super triggered by them. The butthurt would be glorious.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:39 PM
1

To be fair she does seem like someone who would be on board with that message or would take little convincing. It would also be a 'nice and safe' stepping stone since you really can't be condemned for saying babies with penises should have a right to bodily integrity (even by the more radical lefties).
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:16 AM
1

Certain ones no. For example equality under the law isn't the case in family courts in just about all Western countries. They also are not protected from male genital mutilation unlike women in many Western nations.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:14 AM
2

I shall reserve any form of 'red pill' claims until then. ... as should other people. A little part of me is hoping Laci Green goes full 14/88. My sides will never recover.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:54 AM
8

She isn't red pilled. She is simply the first big SJW figure to realize the tide has turned and has given herself the proverbial backdoor out in case her ship sinks. Don't believe this for one second. Until she debunks the wage gap myth, brings up male genital mutilation in a serious discussion or touches one of many other important issues she is just some chick with a wide on for Chris Ray Gun.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:18 AM
47

Maybe in our lifetime we will be lucky enough to witness men being granted human rights. Big maybe but it's beginning to seem possible. Then again when you realize that there was a men's rights movement back in the early 1900s which raised many of the same points that their contemporary equivalents raise you're forced to approach it with skepticism.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:15 AM
9

This is why feminists are also intent on ending prostitution. In general prostitution will cost you less than marriage. They know this and they are worried men will find out. If even ugly men can get sex from good looking women for the equivalent of a few hours of work (the going rate in European nations where it is legalized) why would they invest into dating, pleasing and appeasing unattractive women let alone hand over significant resources in the long run. Disclaimer: not a MGTOW but just hi…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:51 AM
11

Funny, Urban Dictionary doesn't allow me to down-vote the clearly misandrist entries near the end of the list.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:37 AM
6

You sir can make this happen. Trigger some snow flakes.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:32 AM
11

I mean he's 'right-wing' so he's obviously and beyond any reasonable doubt literally Hitler and let's be honest Hitler was a bit of an ass.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:32 AM
0

You can criticize the policy without necessarily putting yourself in danger and of course the most effect is had if you actually talk to people who might be on the fence about such issues. You don't have to 'be a blasphemer' to criticize blasphemy laws. If you're competent and have some skills I'm sure moving back to India is a good thing. It tends to be far easier to make your fortune in developing nations. Many of the smartest and most competent people left the West a generation or two ago for…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:58 AM
1

That would of course happen but it is far more likely that the 'success of the beta' can be attributed to the formation of larger societies. Specifically because these societies enable the betas to always overpower the alphas and as such the alphas are to a large degree always at the mercy of the betas unlike in small tribal situations. One village chief and great warrior might be able to fend off 2-3 attackers in a 20 person tribe but one village chief and great warrior really doesn't stand a c…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:53 AM
1

I'd definitely say that's to a large degree your friend circle and also partially the fact that a billionaire obviously trumps fighter in most long term situations. This is also a thing they've looked into. Women tend to prefer more 'aggressive' & 'masculine' men nearer to ovulation and prefer more 'beta male providers' (beta isn't necessarily used as a pejorative if you look deeper into that whole branch of 'philosophy' or at least not much more than alpha is) otherwise. Generally speaking over…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:47 AM
1

Aerospace engineer does sound like a very interesting profession. I'm a big fan of swimming and enjoy hiking although I prefer 'aimlessly' wandering or biking through nature. Whether I have a place to do that tends to come down to where I am at that point in time.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:39 AM
1

Well then it wasn't wasted text. Happy you enjoyed the story. I must say I also quite like "The Rock" and he does does have a very upbeat character.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:36 AM
2

The SJW maths checks out. 18T = 500T It's just 101 Marxism. There always has to be an oppressor and an oppressed. Any honest reflection on the situation isn't honest reflection but rather standing in the way of progress. Feels over reals. You'll see this every time in history. When reality begins to diverge from the utopia instead of adjusting the theory those that draw attention to this divergence are 'dealt with': The reign of terror in France (although technically not Marxism but Rousseau's i…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:34 AM
1

Woot passed! Cynicism worksTM :P
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:22 AM
1

How is he being offended? I'm guessing he posted vagina and got banned? I think it's fair enough to 'complain' about that. Everyone's initial thought will be that even a radical feminists. The question is specifically set up that way. If not no one would even notice it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:18 AM
3

That's a good one. Think you should go get yourself banned. The triggering would be worth it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:17 AM
2

If you throw an all encompassing net you're bound to get wrapped up in it yourself at some point. Just a matter of time.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:14 AM
2

Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:11 AM
0

'Conservative' societies are making steps towards genuine liberal values. A real world example might be that Trump was very pro-LGBT and that recently the Pope had said paraphrased 'Who are we to deny gays a good life'. On the other hand liberal societies are regressing and moving towards the past with ever more censorship, centralization, separation based on arbitrary characteristics and denial of the superiority of liberal (the actual liberal kind not the shrieking harpy SJW kind) values over …
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:09 AM
1

Historically there were also fairly good evolutionary reasons why men fought. It tends to be pretty hard to reproduce and ensure the success of your offspring if you're a slave (even more so if you're one of the unlucky ones to be taken by Arabs who ensured you couldn't through castration or castration & penectomy if you were black). Historically if you were invaded or attacked and lost you as a male would likely be killed or turned into a slave (women were usually married or taken as sex slaves…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:58 AM
1

I simply like to be able to see the world for what it is. There's lots of beauty but it also serves you to see the ugly reality. Focusing only inward is futile in that sense since you essentially disregard the outside world. A great example of why this might be useful is one of my 'squeeky clean' family members who thinks there are no drugs around would be completely oblivious if he walks into some shady bar he'd just think these people are peculiarly friendly. Anyone who is realistic would see …
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:37 AM
1

Gladiators were mostly slaves. They were forced to fight and it was their one route for salvation. If you were great you could rise from being a captive to someone who was actually revered in society. As such their actions are understandable. Over time this would also attract people who wished to become revered. I'm pretty sure saying he was a nerdy dude who coded a bunch is a pretty accurate account of early adult him. I'm guessing he was probably a nerdy school kid as well. He projects that an…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:27 AM
2

It's just an accurate reflection of the situation. I am pretty naturally flexible (except for one specific hip joint rotation) -14 to -16 on that reach fitness test and -I know it's a tired stereotype- the 'warm up' sessions for martial arts (to my own disadvantage I found out later, back pain and was advised given my flexibility I should never have done 'cold stretches'). I also used to do a lot of exercise and a lot of body weight or body weight augmented stuff so I had pretty good core streng…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:18 AM
1

A person sees what THEY are everywhere. You attract what you are. There is no reality except the one you create for yourself. I'll pass on the post modernist hippie cult stuff. While it is true that perception is of course subjective it doesn't erase the fact that exterior reality exists and is very much real. Yep, you can see the fact that size doesn't make you alpha in dogs. However the difference is when the big dog does snap it's very different. The more confident someone is, the more intell…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:45 AM
1

You brought up the whole alpha beta aspect. Zuckerberg moves and acts like a beta. Just because he owns a massive company and is very wealthy doesn't turn him into a character powerhouse or change his mannerisms. His mannerism are still largely those of a social outcast geeky nerd, not that there's anything wrong with that in principle but it's definitely not alpha. A 5'2" woman that is fierce sure. Not some awkward coder/gamer chick which would be the equivalent.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:47 AM
1

I wouldn't consider Gates or Zuckerberg alpha. They walk like weak betas. Jobs on the other hand did carry a lot more with him and I say this as someone who hates Mac so if anything there'd be negative bias. Cool successful guys. So the top 10% then? Success is literally the one thing that ranks higher than height. Funny how you bring that up. Women definitely seek out men who either have or have the potential to accrue resources & status. The one thing you didn't mention that women usually fawn…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:58 AM
1

While it is nice to see her say the equality women should and do have this is misleading. There are many areas where this equality doesn't exist which is generally the whole point of this sub-Reddit. My guess is this is why the post is getting massively down-voted.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:42 AM
1

That's the reality that 90% of the people who read this will reject because 90% of people are never going to be highly desirable and no one likes the reality where you're objectively shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:39 AM
3

Heaps of successful men just want bimbo trophy wives. Heaps of incredibly desirable women just want guys with a wallet so fat it'd break a safe. In general these dynamics are at play but most (almost all) relationships except truly transactional ones tend to go much deeper than on or two metrics. That isn't to say those metrics aren't at play. Want proof in women -> height. I've never seen men as blatantly into something as women are into height. I've honestly never seen a metric as obvious and …
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:35 AM
1

My guess there is also an element of strong men feeling strong and feeling no need conform to the wishes and norms of society as much as men that feel weaker. Beyond the inevitably loaded questions these surveys are bound to be packed with. Think that men and women have different biological roles -> you're against equality even though it's 101 science? (do we really need science for this though, I'm pretty sure cave men knew this) that women bear children. Think that a stay at home mom who needs…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:29 AM
1

It fulfills at least three of those: Sexual lust Another motive of the lowest kind Especially brutal Tolerant Germany. I mean they actually argued that a fire bomb attack on a Synagogue was a legitimate act of political expression (the left defending Islamists) so can't say I'm surprised. Degeneracy will be its own punishment soon. If anyone just hand-waves those away as ow but she wasn't actually doing it for pleasure even though they were involved in kinky BDSM sex and but a chain/roundsaw is …
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:42 AM
3

It isn't that people have an issue with men being objectified (found visually appealing for having attractive, healthy and in shape bodies) it is the double standard. Like a hot in shape guy and it's OK. Like a hot in shape woman and it is fat shaming. Love guys with giant dicks and you're just wild. Want women with thicc asses or DDs and you're an unrealistic misogynist. SJWs somehow manage to turn the act of mind-fucking hot people unfun... or at least they try but in this case (as in most cas…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:38 AM
1

SPOT FUCKING ON When can we fire up the gas chambers. We really don't have any use for all but the best looking, most intelligent ones and even then we only need a few for sperm donations. Obviously this is sarcasm.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:33 AM
1

If you bargain with terrorists you are inviting terrorism. You cannot bargain with certain individuals because any 'common ground' you might find will further violate your principles and simply deal the opposition a winning hand. As an example. Bargaining with say ISIS and agreeing that apostates shouldn't be stoned but instead executed in a humane way is not finding common ground it is simply accepting defeat. You could even soften this penalty to amputation or further soften it to imprisonment…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:36 PM
2

It isn't legal if you have a position of authority over the person. Teacher should fulfill this. Otherwise it is permitted. There is a reason they don't reveal this 'secret'. Now if you were to ask me should anyone be prosecuted that would be much more complicated but it very much appears to be the case that some law was broken and that silence is protection against any possible prosecution.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:28 PM
2

I wonder if she'll prosecute Macron's rapist? You know the one that has made it clear that no one will find out when their relationship got intimate because it is illegal to engage in a such a relationship with a minor who you are in a position of power over such as a teacher. On a more serious note I think this is just newspeak and preemptive appeasement. He a govt. & Rothschild banker shill and managed to run as the 'outside candidate' after literally being the economic adviser. He is obviousl…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:02 PM
1

He isn't innocent in any way. Any punishment he had coming his way. The victim in this story is that 12 year old girl. I don't think this is so much a men's rights or feminist issue as it is one of sexual abuse of minors by their parent(s)/guardian(s).
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:58 PM
1

Hey, would you look at that our message is finally getting somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:53 PM
2

Still waiting on the lawsuit against Iran for subjugating their female ministers. Just exhume me when it happens.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:50 PM
2

To use their language against them. Generally that's how you know you're on the right side of history. The tired Nazi example won't hold up because yes dumb ideas also deserve to be heard primarily because it allows people to ridicule them and debunk them far and wide. This is why shitty totalitarian governments always rely on cracking down on dissent and censorship: They know their shit ideas can be debunked if they provide anyone with a brain and an hour to spare a platform.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:50 PM
1

HAVE MEMES GONE TOO FAR YOU MIGHT ASK? They weren't meant to take these sarcastic remarks seriously.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:20 AM
20

Been a while since I've seen that cancer. Thank you. It fit perfectly.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:18 AM
1

Well if she can make a proper case for it by misdirection and using fancy terms or knowledge of anatomy that makes her appear like the authority figure and people side with her then that is an issue. You have to understand what she is talking about so that you can show how it is simply misdirection/obfuscation.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:36 AM
1

Both should be illegal but yes the structural equivalent would be removing the clitoral hood.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:20 AM
1

Yes. The woman in the video specifically raises the case (if I remember correctly) and if you don't have an apt answer she wins the debate and then baby boys and baby girls get to have people cutting their genitals. Tucker is usually pretty decent at these kind of things but you could also see he went in with a blase she's dumb I'll destroy her attitude, didn't do his homework and looked like a fool/didn't have a decent counter argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:35 AM
1

It's not the functional equivalent. The foreskin is probably closer to the functional equivalent of the clitoris however it is not structurally analogous. Cutting out the inner structure of the clitoris would be analogous to also cutting out the entire penis down to the penile base. Genital modification between consenting adults of sound mind and body isn't reprehensible. You might find it stupid/pointless/dangerous but so are tattoos, piercings etc. The issue is it is performed on babies that c…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:22 AM
30

Ah yes. 92:8. Equality.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:28 AM
0

Nope. It would be structurally analogous to amputating the clitoris. You could make the case that it would only be maybe the top 10% of the penis since most of the clitoris is buried inside the body but the point is the clitoris is the structural equivalent of the penis not the vagina. The vagina develops out of a different structure. Just go read that Wikipedia page I linked.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:02 AM
3

So there was no malice? I assumed it would've been a domestic violence case. Then I guess this makes a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:37 PM
1

Would he benefit from reading the study on the most erogenous zones on a mans penis? Would he benefit from that 20k vs. 8k nerve endings point? Yep. Should he have made the case for them? Probably or completely ignored it (which would be hard since she directly mentions it). I wouldn't say he defends male circumcision he says there is a difference and due to a bunch of (shitty) studies being conducted in the past that supposedly indicate some potential health benefits. This is actually a serious…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:35 PM
1

I know which forms there are but I believe he stated that removing the clitoris is not analogous to male circumcision and statement is factually accurate not some form of circumcision apologism. Removing the clitoral hood would be what is structurally analogous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_related_male_and_female_reproductive_organs
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:16 PM
7

This was rather hilarious and cute.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:51 PM
7

Too much SJW Koolaid.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:51 PM
67

Now a child grows up with a sociopath as a mother. I'm sure that's a great environment for a child.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:49 PM
1

Don't cut shit off babies genitals. or Men are humans too.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:46 PM
0

I don't think he defended it. He pointed out that amputation of the clitoris isn't structurally the same as circumcision and this is true. The structural equivalent would be amputation of the penis. Was interesting to see the only MSM coverage against circumcision was from a pro-FGM advocate. Irony.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:45 PM
6

Her dad sounds like a real piece of shit. I still don't think you should publicly leak private discussions. I guess it is two wrongs don't make a right but I'd honestly get that the girl would post this.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 03:15 PM
1

Spend some time on Saudi Twitter.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:13 PM
27

Did the boys not want the girls there though? Maybe a few single mothers? I'd always give people the benefit of the doubt. I know people with jealous annoying girlfriends and I know girls who tag along for 'a guys drinking night' a few times thinking they might have fun and eventually just realize it isn't for them.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:03 AM
3

Well by feminists definitions they haven't. Remember women can't rape men. Even if they use an object that is literally modeled off of a penis that isn't and can not be rape. Reasons. Don't question. The thought-poleez hears an sees all.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 04:31 PM
11

But that's like individualism or something! You know I judge the individual and then paint their entire gender with a broad brush! This is sexism! Don't you know women can't be sexist!
/r/MensRights05/05/17 04:30 PM
22

What's new. Women are also capable of evil and when given preferential treatment abuse this position of privilege/power. It's almost like they are human beings with agency. But I'd probably be branded literally Hitler for pointing out women are people and can make decisions.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:59 PM
12

Umm... I'm pretty sure you don't buy sex robots for companionship. I think the name implies you buy them to get off. If not they might be called companionship robots instead of SEX robots. It's like feminists have redefined words so much they simply don't understand what they mean anymore. What's interesting is feminists losing their shit about sex robots, (occasionally surrogacy) & the artificial womb shows that deep down inside they know female privilege is real and that these technologies wil…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:14 AM
1

I would agree. The Marxist left and the religious right really do make a bunch of cases for horseshoe theory.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:46 PM
30

Why do we put locks on doors you might say? Maybe we should send all of humanity to the re-education camps to learn that stealing is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:43 PM
5

I mean... the leftists haven't learned from history. Look at any oppressive regime. They all history shop. In the West the same indoctrination happens but instead of being extremely nationalist in its lies it is extremely anti-nationalist in its lies because that is the god the left has embraced.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:58 AM
10

Sure. This is why the state loves to have control of the education system. They can indoctrinate their drones just right.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:06 AM
9

What an asinine comment as well. I could pull up a few comments from almost any place that has comments that literally have Hitler did nothing wrong etc. in them... It's the internet.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:16 AM
7

I honestly inferred that from reading the title but worth clarifying I guess. The intolerance for ideas that diverge from the narrative is shocking. SJWs & feminists are literally our generations religious zealots, slave drivers & moral puritans.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:14 AM
18

I think she actually believes the gays are oppressing her by not giving her the same pussy pass normal heterosexual men do. If you're used to a life of privilege equality seems like oppression. It's funny how much of intersectional theory you can refute literally with their own words.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:07 AM
8

That could come in very handy. It appears courts take texts seriously (although I assume these are the provider logs not you devices but you device likely serves as basis for checking). Some times the police state might work in your favour. Do you have any practicing lawyers in your extended friend/associate circle who you could trust to give you a straight conversation? I think that might be best.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:08 AM
34

The retarded thing is people should just let other people get off to what they want. I'm not particularly pro-homosexuality, or perversion or degeneracy although I could probably fulfill the last 2 out of three things mentioned sufficiently but people should be allowed to be. Fuck: feminist identitarians gay identitarians straigh identitarians fetish identitarians the rest of 'em.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:00 AM
10

That definitely strengthens your case especially if other individuals could corroborate a relationship to both of you not just you but I'm not sure 1 witness would suffice against loaded family courts. Are there any other individuals that would know of these things and be willing to testify? I think legal consultation is definitely the best solution since laws vary state by state. I'm sorry I can't be of more help in you specific case.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:57 AM
9

Do you have any witnesses that can consolidate your points. Her kicking you out for no reason, potentially assaulting you etc.?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:31 AM
16

Because one is actually a movement for equality while the other is one for supremacy. Feminism in practice is misandry. MRA in practice is an acceptable of inferiority and discrimination but a fight for less thereof. http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:28 AM
0

That was the joke.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:21 AM
16

Ow boy. Soon they'll be telling us how the pixels in an imaginary game cause real things in the real world. ...ow right the left already went full Religious right.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:25 PM
2

Or beat and continue to beat on when he's unconscious.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:43 PM
3

That's what the Marxist victim (proletariat) vs. oppressor (bourgeoisie) mentality gets you. Let this be a lesson to the socialist here. This train of thought is dangerous and always ends in innocent victims beings abused.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:09 PM
5

If this isn't Poe's law that's genuinely terrifying. This is the kind of stuff you don't see in free societies or societies where the majority of actors can be rational.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:02 PM
9

Maybe it has something to do with that totally not medieval murderous cult they all believe in over there... Can't say I haven't been trying to ward feminists and the LGBT community.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:01 PM
1

I'm not really an MRA. I just debunk feminist bullshit. At best I'm the de facto 'MRA' in any situation because I've always been the one that plays devils advocate and don't mind calling out retarded feminist indoctrination in groups even if it might cost me associates or friends. Fun fact... sometimes you find out you were defending a male sexual assault victim while he was quiet all the while the feminists there were telling you, you were the bigot. Seeing them have to back peddle is definitel…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:13 PM
1

I mean at least this makes more sense than raping women by looking at them. In this case you are sending sound waves their way, in the other case photos are rebounded by their bodies towards you eyes. Does that mean that women's mere presence is actually assaulting any and all men that might accidentally look their way? We'll let whatever the male equivalent of a radical feminist is decide.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:29 PM
1

So, maybe we could just agree that both men and women had their own advantages and disadvantages and that being a woman was not inherently better or easier than being a man? In the way you're thinking of it where you look at the little things there are pros and cons it's hard to really quantify each one and as such might as well call it even. But that was never my claim. I looked at the big picture and there women were twice as likely to pass on their genes, that's the definition of having it be…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:40 AM
1

or characteristic attribute If you're going to be a grammar Nazi try you should make sure your definition matches your argument. The condition of a womb in women is that if everything goes right you get born, aren't infertile, don't make yourself infertile, grow up and will have a womb that can birth progeny for a few decades. Feel free to also Google inherently good to see that it's often used in a rather lax way, people aren't inherently good... anyone who asserts this is either pontificating,…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:06 PM
1

Still provides that value so long as she can change her mind and a lot of people will assume this. The amount of people I know who say 'I'll never have kids' who have kids is pretty hilarious. I planned to never have kids and thought it was stupid and now I'd realistically want to have at least 5 if not more if it is financially feasible. If you don't use it until you are infertile then it's true you didn't make any use of it. Inherent doesn't have to imply permanent it can just mean it is there…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:57 PM
1

I'm not telling you how to feel about your uterus/vagina/womb I'm simply pointing out that the womb is a valuable resource for not only biology but also nations and the women who have them. If you don't reproduce be my guest but then in the future people like you will not exist. My point exactly. If that's what you want fine but then you're out of the gene pool. We might pass this point soon with technology but we have no precedent for any other species ever having achieved this. Humans have a v…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:00 PM
1

If you actually think the womb isn't a gift I guess no amount of reality might help. You literally hand waive 2:1 and up to 17:1 representation in the gene pool as though that is nothing. The calculations were basic apply the same assume a 30-50% casualty rate for very bloody fights. the logic holds up. Male black slaves in their prime were expensive because they could essentially accrue the most resources... men have never been more than the value of their resources. This is why I doubt this pl…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:04 AM
1

We are animals. We like to think ourselves above this but at the end of the day we still are. To an animal there is but one purpose for existence and that is reproduction. Of course humanity rationalizes their life in many interesting ways which is a good thing but the reality is being allowed to continue to exist is a privilege. Those that don't play by natures rules forfeit their right to exist (well for the next 50 or so years and all of human history at least). That is my point: the right to…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:05 PM
9

Ah yes. The old words are violence. Thanks for my daily dose of thought-police.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:55 AM
1

What would I care if men had sex. They're out of the gene pool. Sure it's nice to have the same access to sex but it doesn't 'matter'. There is some reason to suspect life before then would've been a little easier since bones show that around 9,000 years ago people were less healthy for 4,000 years than 20,000 years ago but that still makes the point. When shit gets rough a womb essentially gives you a value a dick doesn't. They can't go back further because DNA doesn't last forever and old DNA …
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:38 AM
2

https://psmag.com/8-000-years-ago-17-women-reproduced-for-every-one-man-6d41445ae73d Haplogroup mapping isn't some witchform either. We know there is a mitochondrial eve (believe around 60k years ago) and a Y chromosomal Adam (around 40k years ago).
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:20 PM
-30

BURNED
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 03:42 PM
6

Everyone objectifies everyone. At the root of it objectification is commodification and we are all to some extend commodities to someone or something. There is nothing wrong with this, in fact it is good. We don't want an employer to think about the person when hiring someone but about the productivity that person provides. Imagine if movies considered applicants feelings instead of their acting ability. Hollywood would somehow manage to get worse than it is now. I also get that Hollywood is dum…
/r/MensRights29/04/17 03:11 PM
7

What's new? 'The Left' (at least in its current authoritarian collectivist leaning) has always been for genocide and getting rid of whomever they deem the undesirables. We have about 100 years of data on this phenomenon.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:02 PM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:12 AM
9

Where it should be. It doesn't exist. There shouldn't be body positivity for either sex. If you are significantly over weight you should try and lose weight and then maintain a healthy body fat percentage. It'll be good for your health and it will in very many cases improve the quality of your day to day life. I get the double standard and am not a fan but we shouldn't want body positivity for men. 2 wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 06:02 AM
3

Because historically 80% of women have reproduced and only 40% of men and when times got rough this ration moved as high as 17 women for every 1 man. I'd call that the prime definition of privilege. The right to essentially continue to exist and not be thrown out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 05:51 AM
10

Sure reeks of equality. Totally doesn't lead one to believe that it is a superiority movement.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 10:10 AM
18

I guess they've gone there. Biology is LITERALLY sexist. Not that I'm surprised... but it is pretty stupid if this isn't misrepresented or taken out of context. What's next? The feminist will start arguing that being privileged with a womb is somehow sexist biological oppression all the while ignoring how historically the opposite is true?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:30 AM
6

Well... it is also why it is such a brilliant tool of disinformation and so effective at brainwashing. If reality doesn't conform to your ideology you simply redefine all the parameters so that it now matches up.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:27 AM
5

Agreed.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:25 AM
2

All 300 and another 60,000 more that you haven't listed you misogynist!!!
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:25 AM
11

Ow that makes it completely reasonable. She only had a bout of PTSD over an article that conflicted with her ideology.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:23 AM
27

My opinion literally just raped your feelings. Call the thought-poleez! REEEE
/r/MensRights27/04/17 06:18 PM
3

Sex tech industry? Could they pick a less edgy name... Dildos aren't tech do they still count? Or is it only dildos with microchips. I really dislike when people pick needlessly specific terms that actually end up accomplishing the opposite.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 04:17 PM
696

...and then they say that their rape hysteria isn't devaluing the actual experience of real rape victims. ...because mean words are just as horrible a vicious and violent rape. 5 years from now when you walk into a police station and say you were raped they'll hand you a constitution and a pacifier and send you on your way.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:52 PM
36

I believe this is what they would call 'male privilege'.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:06 PM
1

It's not that we want some people to be more equal than others but we want some people to be more equal than others. We just don't like the label supremacy.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:41 AM
1

That's pretty close to a double blind system. I like that more. Most US, UK & Australian universities tend to favour some form of 'statement of intent'. I believe with time the more effective (which I also think is a purely quantitative assessment) will be adopted.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 01:07 AM
1

I'd say it is just something that has to be viewed case by case. Even if the data were to lean 75 vs. 25 I'd maintain that position that every single case should be reviewed individually. I'd have a lot of trouble apply any absolute solution in such a situation simply because according to the statistics it would cause a lot of suffering even if they were heavily in favour of one choice.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:05 AM
1

This is extremely hard to gauge. There are honestly far too many variables. If the single mother has no support system and really is on her own and the adopting couple is a couple known to her where there is evidence that they are great with children probably the adoptive couple. If the single mother has a support system in the form of a family or a long term partner and otherwise has a stable life it is probable that it'd be the single mother. There really is too much what if in a question like…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:38 PM
1

I'd agree that the number of convictions is very likely much closer to the actual number of rapes than the total number noted when you take into account every tracking method (heaps are going to be double reports in such a system anyways even before evaluating whether they might be factual or not). Nonetheless I don't know of a better way to try and guesstimate the ratio of men being raped vs. the ratio of women being raped. My guess is it is significantly lower than women's but I'm guessing it'…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:35 PM
6

Pay gap is tired... there are tons of debunks out there. dominant sex Historically 80% of women have reproduced and just 40% of men and in times of hardship this went as high as 17 women per man. I'd say we've had it harder when there's essentially been a purge on more than half of us: https://psmag.com/8-000-years-ago-17-women-reproduced-for-every-one-man-6d41445ae73d 2000 years ago... pretty sure we all hate Saudi Arabia. Women are considered as weaker They are. It's biology. Men are larger an…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 09:25 PM
1

I have complete ignorance of the economy yet here you are complaining that not enough jobs exist but advocating for govt. enforced regulations that will detriment the job market. Can't say I'm surprised. Employers as a class Sure they are. Employers also compete for labour... you sound like a prototypical Marxist. If you've ever owned a business you know how hard you compete for good employees and that your offer a lot of 'quality of life stuff' on top of the salary. You also tend to if possible…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:47 PM
3

My guess is the majority of people are here to watch obnoxious third-wave feminists who claim to be for equality and preach that biology is just a social construct getting a smackdown from reality. I'm guessing a bunch are also subscribed to /r/whiteknighting because 'beta cuck males' who think that the best way to get a girl is to be a giant walking pussy is just as hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 06:07 PM
14

No... I make offensive jokes because they are funny and I don't care about your feelings... especially not when those same jokes actually evoke positive feelings in myself and others. Not to mention that warm fuzzy feeling I get triggering an SJW. Seriously that's infinitely more warm fuzzies than even the most racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, ableist & ageist comment would get out of an SJW in terms of negative emotions.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 06:00 PM
2

Actually someone linked me a study showing how wearing a tie does have negative effects and raises blood pressure. The link is: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771792/ credit goes to: DRU-ZOD1980 for digging it up. So if we're being consistent places would also need to allow a loose tie policy. I did point out that most places don't require you to wear the tie tight (which would likely be a solution). Youre "just dont work there" argument shows a complete lack of awareness of how t…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 05:43 PM
2

When did I ever imply the human race would starve if women stop wearing high heels? They don't have to. If you sign up for a job where the job description explicitly states requires wearing high heels there is nothing wrong there. The same with wearing ties all the way up. It's going to be a tiny minority of businesses that require this but I'm sure they'll have their reasons. I mean I was enlightened to the fact that even Hooters doesn't require high heels so if a strip restaurant doesn't enfor…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:53 PM
1

I'll be honest with you I didn't actually think it was a gay Scottish strip joint :P The more you know I guess.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:50 AM
2

Is Tilted Kilt a gay Scottish strip restaurant... because that's a niche market I never knew existed :P
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:17 AM
1

Most of the airlines I fly have a pretty identifiable uniform but the ones that have tried something 'unique' have usually made it needlessly complicated and I don't think it made their staff look any better or more comfortable.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:16 AM
1

No there shouldn't be. It should be negotiated and compensated accordingly. Seriously if there were laws banning dangerous work that'd be it for humanity. The economy would grind to a complete halt over 3 months and mass starvation would likely kill 2-5 billion people. They should be warned if the health risks are known and compensated accordingly.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:14 AM
2

Most places that require you wear a tie won't require you to make it tight. However if they do then it would only be equitable if the high heel thing passes that they are also petitioned to do this (not that that'll happen). Personally I do believe you should be allowed to require both as a business but just warn the staff before they sign on. I mean high heels and neck ties do stress you body but no more than hard manual labour does and those jobs are legal.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:47 PM
11

That's what they claim it is however in practice it is about female supremacy. The unwillingness of feminist organizations to accept the plight of men and advocate for them is an example of this. In fact often times feminists actively silence voices that try to draw attention to this. Look no further than the Red Pill fiascos happening all the time. Not to mention the Duluth model which is the most vile, sexist garbage that has vocal support from many feminists. It's all Marxist garbage at this …
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:18 PM
3

I know that the way you present yourself matters. I've known this since I was 15 or so and whenever I went to liquor stores in a sleek suit jacket I never got asked for my ID but if I went with that exact same jacket and my large can headphones I literally got asked for my ID every time until I was 20 or 21. My point is that in institutions of higher learning the way you dress shouldn't have any bearing (even though inevitably it does). I honestly don't know enough about actual MRAs to say wheth…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 02:31 PM
6

Why does the way you dress have anything to do with the content of your seminars? Not saying that if a professors want's to look sleek he shouldn't try and improve his look and that this wouldn't be a (potentially) helpful resource but why should he? Same goes for female professors. For all I care you could be writing in your own feces if the content of your lectures is great then so be it. This is obviously hyperbole and you should meet some minimum standards to keep everyone happy but I person…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:55 PM
2

My response was intended as sarcasm.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:24 PM
112

"If he gets raped he should be happy because she's pleasuring him furthering the patriarchal notion that women simply exist to provide men sexual gratification." Pretty sure I'm feminisming right.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:51 AM
1

I meant it in a more colloquial sense. I also think the content of an essay would necessarily be included in its quality. If you cannot write at all you'll probably be rejected but the reality is if you cannot write at all you probably lack basic reading skills as well and as such would be poorly suited to be a veterinarian. If you can write at any acceptable level I'm sure the content of the person's character will be the major decision maker. I've been through this with someone else on this th…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/17 11:28 AM
5

Dress codes do suck but if you decide to work for a company I think it is fair that they want to present a specific image. There will also be companies with more lax policies. Shopping centers where staff have absolutely no uniform are a genuine nightmare. I've been through 2-3 of them in my life and you legitimately end up asking 3 people before you get a person who works there.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:13 AM
5

Strip clubs? Hooters? My guess and sexretaries for wealthy business men who can afford eye candy I'd assume.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:12 AM
25

I very much dislike this on the principle of freedom of association. Why can't businesses exist that require women and/or men to wear high heels? If someone thinks that is a condition they want to accept then so be it. On the other hand I don't find the comparison to men's suits & ties a fair one since high heels when worn for extended periods of time place incredible strain on the body and can cause harm. It isn't just a uniform thing.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:11 AM
5

Nice so I guess that means we can add Mother to the list of words we cannot say? Unless of course it is in worship. Thanks feminism. Nothing we the people love more than people banning words.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:35 AM
1

She'll even have more oppression points because being trans is higher up the victim hierarchy than woman.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:20 AM
1

Stats aren't irrelevant. If we allow that argument then the feminist just say 90% of rapes aren't reported (to the police or authorities) and on top of that another like 500% just happen and women don't realize they've been raped. The stats are the stats. We should attempt to approximate the report at which crimes are under-reported but most nations I know of have yearly crime surveys for this reason. The govt. and agencies do know that not all crime is reported (for a variety of reasons) and th…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:13 AM
1

Nope. It isn't about the quality or ability of your writing but the content of that writing. You don't need to be a writer to write moving stories (it helps but isn't by any means required). A bullet point list with good noble/good reasons would also suffice but most universities want some statement of intent which I think is reasonable. If I were selecting a student (and had several to choose from for just one position) I'd like to get to the know the person and his reasons for wanting the posi…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/17 08:10 AM
1

I've always hated comics so I wouldn't know but a lot of female superheroes (at least from what I've gathered) seemed rather forced or like a cheap cash grab to try and capitalize on the girls who want a girl superhero. To be accurate Blaire's technically a dude. Taking hormones now but grew up as a boy and as such would've had her brain develop under male biochemistry (and I find what tends to define a person are their brain and their experiences so you can't really ignore one or the other). I …
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:59 PM
9

You know what I always find ironic is that the people who claim to be fighting sexism are always the ones that think your hero needs to be the same sex. I see the value in a strong male role model for boys and conversely for girls but I don't think most people check their 'hero's' junk when picking them. Like... isn't it... sexist... you know... to be like... I can only like... respect and want to be like... you know... someone with like... the same genitals as me... you like... totally?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:44 PM
7

Statistically speaking the odds of you getting raped are very, very small. I personally think you're being unreasonable. If we all lived in fear of what could happen we'd literally stand in the corner of a room for a few seconds before we'd give ourselves a heart attack. Bad things can happen and one or two bad things will happen to most people in a lifetime but that shouldn't stop you living your life. You honestly do seem like you might have some anxiety issues. From the post I'd say nothing c…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:42 PM
1

Like I said on a technicality and I was nitpicking to nitpick. I didn't actually check the images since it's pretty much a given they've hooked up for certain and in all likelihood had heaps more actual sexual contact. I'm not a fan of the fact that if the sexes were reverse it'd be at least a court hearing if not jail time but because it's this way it'll be OMG HOW COULD SHE on the news for 1-2 weeks and then it'll be forgotten.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 06:25 PM
1

This is me just nitpickinging but it if I'm not mistaken it isn't illegal to date someone under the age of consent (I assume it's 18 where they are?) if there is no sexual contact. So she is still fine on a technicality (as long as they haven't hooked up I guess).
/r/MensRights20/04/17 06:04 PM
7

I actually found this number rather encouraging: Women surveyed separately saw things much differently. Just 18 percent of women said it was now time for men to get more attention when it comes to gender equality. Even in cuckedAF Germany 18% of women have woken up to the plight of men. If it's possible there I'd imagine it is only a matter of 1-2 decades that it becomes mainstream. Then again maybe I'm delusional and ignoring biology and the fact that biology simply doesn't care about men.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:47 PM
1

It's a pretty brilliant anti-radfem meme. This sub-Reddit just can't have a laugh in between serious issues. Every time someone posts something funny 85%+ of the responses are rather bleak and serious (not that they're wrong but they definitely embraced that tragedy part of comedy a bit too much).
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:41 PM
1

I also think that helps a lot. If that is an option it is always great. While a grandfather is often a bit old for a male play friend (at least for active children) he can still serve as a good male role model.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:08 PM
1

That was my point. As a single mother you usually have a pretty strenuous schedule that involves: preparing for the child then working often part time since you need to be home around 1pm then getting the child then working another part time job to make something then coming home to prepare dinner and clean a bit It doesn't leave a lot of time for nurture. Welfare usually covers that second part time shift (and in many cases is abused so that they don't work at all but usually that requires 3 or…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:59 PM
1

Like many other things it is probably a mix of both. There'll be correlation at work but it will also be causation. The reality is if you're a single mother you're more likely to be less economically well off or be a full time parent and this also leads to the same problems so in that sense a major part will be correlation but I would actually argue that it is for all intents and purposes effectively causation in and of itself since the single motherhood directly influences (and often creates) t…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:10 PM
3

In principal no issue however if you look at the effects it has on the child it becomes a societal issue. Boys who grow up fatherless are far less likely to succeed academically & economically and far more likely to end up involved in crime & possibly imprisoned. Single motherhood also has the potential to devastate communities. A good example would be what happened to black communities from the 60s until recently as a consequence of welfare subsidizing and encouraging single motherhood. Thomas …
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:17 PM
3

SPICY
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:20 PM
37

Wait are they actually saying its due to women choosing higher paying fields of work to get a degree in? If there is one thing I hate it is people who will happily deny an argument on principle only to assume it as their own defense once they find themselves in the same position.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:18 PM
1

Then again when the intersectional brainwashing is strong enough facts, science and empirical truths become tools of the white, CIS, heteronormative, capitalist, imperialist patriachy. Although I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he just hasn't thought about it long enough to realize that women can rape and that he isn't a insane SJW who's lost his grip on reality.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:06 PM
2

In that case it wouldn't really affect his teachings anyways. It's kinda hard to turn a class about physics into one about what rape truly is. Even if he does it is unlikely that the students would be influenced by this or manipulated by it. Maybe 15 minutes of a class if he really goes on a rant. Not ideal but wasting 15 minutes of a class has (essentially) never gotten a professor terminated.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:04 PM
8

DON'T There fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:43 PM
1

"no or modest weight loss with exercise alone." There we go, so it does work. Also never claimed that you necessarily lose weight but it does affect weight. If you gain muscle your weight changes. If you lose fat your weight changes. Circle back to what I said before. Obesity is not defined as weight but as excess body fat. If you weight 100kg and are 35% body fat that's usually a pretty significant issue. If you weigh 100kg and have 15% body fat you're in a good spot (assuming males for this ex…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:01 PM
1

...and you will be a lot healthier. It also does affect weight but your percentage of body fat reduces. I know these arguments and they are true exercise isn't an ideal weight loss tool but a sedentary lifestyle leads to fat gain and an active one doesn't and in most cases leads to the opposite. Obesity isn't defined as weight. It is defined as excess body fat.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:37 AM
1

I can't say that surprises me but good to know they're doing these studies. Excess energy isn't even the bad guy. He's a good guy. I hear excess energy when applied properly is great at solving health issues such as obesity, lethargy, social withdrawal etc. Don't worry I get the point you're making :P I just know the next 'big illness' will be too much energy and desire to move or some other nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:23 AM
11

He shouldn't be fired for his opinion. If he is a professor of law then it would depend on which nation he is in and you could determine whether he is wrong. If he is a professor of sociology or philosophy then he should be reprimanded and told to teach not only his personal opinion but that of the opposition as well as the legal framework. If he is a professor in some other field then it likely has no relation to his field of expertise so it is entirely his own opinion which he is entitled even…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:45 AM
6

I was about to say the same thing. The symptoms mimic those of a dog you keep inside in a small room all the time. They become anxious, loud, difficult to control, stop listening and eventually become aggressive.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:17 AM
8

This isn't necessarily a new revelation. People have been complaining that ADHD pathologizes certain characteristics that boys tend to exhibit for a while (I recall hearing about this around 10+ years ago). Essentially a byproduct of a feminized learning system where boys are extremely unsatisfied and thus become hyperactive and difficult to control and are then branded as defective. Give them an outlet for their energy and they'll be a lot more satisfied as well as eager and capable of paying a…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:15 AM
3

Ah yes the old damned if you do damned if you don't. Soon they'll embrace the notion that if you don't beat your female partner you simply do not care enough about them to beat them and as such you're also a domestic abuser no different to one that does (or some other retarded bullshit).
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:34 AM
2

Would be interesting enough to know. I don't know of any places where such information would exist. Probably best off looking at a few rural precincts/counties crime statistics across a few states and comparing them to the crime statistics of urban centers.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:32 AM
1

He simply wonders if this is a broader trend (and if it is to what extend) or one that is highly influence by environment.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:30 AM
5

We getting our own CONTROL THE RECORD & SHARIA BLUE. I guess that means that we've made it as a sub and are now to dangerous to ignore by the forces that be. Somewhere a Pepe is smiling down upon our collective achievement murmuring FEELS GOOD MAN.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:34 PM
2

No one cares if you came in last. It only matters if you win. This is reality. If you were the second best candidate for a job opening you don't get the job. Now if you make it to say the Olympics of course that is an achievement in and of itself... but that is because to get there you needed to win countless competitions and be the very best in your country or a large part of your country. The effort is acknowledged and taken into account when it comes to credits for the subject in school which…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:32 AM
1

Yep, there's a good saying to go with this: 'It isn't better because it's new but it isn't good because it's old.' The issue is currently people are scrapping traditions under no better guise than we have something new and untested but because it is new it must definitively be better. In many cases it isn't working. A good example would be the breakup of the family unit and the effects it has on children. Traditionalism can be reformed but progress moves slow. This can serve as a benefit or a de…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:23 AM
55

This is an Islamic fundamentalist issue. Homosexuals don't have it great but gay men tend to have it worse than gay women.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:24 PM
3

I think we're finally beginning to see a change in that with one estimate pegging millennial black male support for Trump at around 1 in 4. Regardless of your political affiliation (hate Trump or love him) it is an example of people from the inner cities finally waking up and voting against a party that hasn't sufficiently addressed their needs.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:22 PM
1

YOLO To those graphic designers that took this action :P In case you haven't already check out Thomas Sowell. I in no way intend to hate on Sotomayor but Thomas Sowell makes the same points far more eloquently. In fact I think Sotomayor might get a lot of his ideas from Sowell and his works (although I have no evidence for this just suspicion).
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:20 PM
1

It does seem like it is build around a lot of subservience but I don't think these people are fetishists (they're probably real boring). They just see the world as man works 8-12 hours in a job he doesn't like being at for me and the family. I owe him a meal, clean home and an orgasm at night. Conservative folk aren't the sexual deviants. Even when they 'go crazy' it's just a Christian girls doing a guy in a cubicle. When 'liberal' folks go crazy you get eFUKTs shit white people do.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 12:17 PM
0

Traditionalism isn't terrible in the sense that it has worked. Feminism doesn't and is pretty close to tearing Western society apart. I'll happily stand along side any traditionalist against this madness even though I find many of their ideas equally offensive (I assume you don't mean fundamentalist Jihadis who execute gays, just Christian folk who believe in chastity until marriage at worst). I also think ignoring feminism denigrating the stay at home mom isn't accurate. This wasn't so much an …
/r/MensRights11/04/17 12:14 PM
2

I don't think this is a reasonable fear. I'm certain if he is in pain and has a 'tiny prescription' the doctor would immediately see/notice this and not think such a thing respectively. I really think he should do this. Help him get there.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 12:09 PM
4

On a side note I don't think this is the font for quotes :P So Papyrus-esque. It's honestly like Papyrus and Comic Sans had a baby. Pretty sure you've killed at least 1-2 graphic designers with this image.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:50 AM
11

Shame he's seen as a 'coon' by so many people in the communities he is trying to help. This is a serious problem. If women can just marry the state then men will be cast aside and it will hit the 'good men' the hardest because their value is in providing a stable income and good home which will be of little interest.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:47 AM
2

So children are supposed to sleep in the same room as their parent/step-parent? Yes. Ridiculous. Not at all. In fact it was how it was handled for all but the last 100 years in every place on earth and is still how it is handled for maybe 40-60% of the world's population. The fact that you think that is ridiculous shows how well off you are. People who earn US$90k don't necessarily spend more on their children. They might choose to (and the vast majority will) but there is no court order that th…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:43 AM
2

Kids don't need their own room. That's exactly where that sense of entitlement starts. Next you'll tell me you also expect to get a 2 bedroom unit in the center of town and designer clothes and an Apple Macbook are a requirement. I appreciate your sentiment but the reality is that those things cost a lot, you don't need them and if financial abortion is legalized I sure as hell don't want my taxes going to that. If you're a parent who is earning enough that they can pay US$200-300 I think that i…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:58 AM
-1

I can't wait till they decide that the honour of winning a race shall be divided up across all the participants. It's the inevitable consequence of the everyone gets a trophy mentality. Soon you'll actually be a winner just for showing up.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:45 AM
2

What % are men? Then show all the options available to females. Also, chronical all the domestic violence shelters and find how many accept men. Exactly. I would work with a shelter. Stop by or call. I would work with local shelters, soup kitchens and the likes however I would also do actual night runs (get a guardian to come with you). The vast majority of homeless that have it worst (sleeping rough, no shelter) tend to be men and they'd never show up if you don't go out in the cold. It is in p…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:21 AM
1

But would you want a Spirithood second hand from a dirty hippie :P That's a fair point. I'll mention it.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:18 AM
1

I'm guessing it comes down to knowing where to look and buying bulk at discounters or maybe you're living in a very expensive area? I know Elon Musk lived off of US$ 1 a day to prove he could make it if he went broke (sure a long time ago). I just can't imagine that Europe would be notably different in pricing considering that some of the largest discounter chains are in the US and they have a market that is 4x larger than the largest European nation. Kid's lunches are of course unafforable. You…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:17 AM
1

I'll definitely pass it on to a girl I used to have a thing with. Shes a huge fan of big cat prints, cat ears etc. I'm sure you made & ruined her day all in one with this (since I doubt she wants to pay US$260+international shipping).
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:30 PM
3

Collect information on the amount of homeless people in your town/city/neighbourhood and do the demographics. Think up some worthwhile questionnaires regarding why they ended there, what they need for help etc. I'm sure they'd be happy to assist you for a warm homemade sandwich/meal. You're looking into an area where the majority of those affected tend to be male but you aren't being exclusive which I think is good and simply by doing what you would do you'd be doing something good.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:57 PM
1

Yep, I think it's well suited. It's never been above feminists to call Blacks, Jews or Poles Nazis.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:24 PM
1

...and now watch as society is outraged. CRICKETS
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:22 PM
2

So I am guessing human resources will now be redefined as mankind ow fuck that didn't work either.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:22 PM
2

Soon the castrations will be mandatory. Thank FeminazismTM.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:21 PM
2

Spirithood. That's perfect. Couldn't ask for a more amusing name.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:17 PM
2

Ow man. Now they're going to try and take the one thing these nerds have? Seriously though... why would you expect every competition to have a demographic split representing the country. I see four people. The odds of getting four boys are 6.25% if we assume the same amount of women enter the competition and are equally good (but my guess is it's probably a 70/30 split).
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:35 PM
1

I'd agree with just about everything except the figure. I think even sums like US$200 or US$300 are very high. It doesn't take much to feed and clothe a child. I don't know the exact prices in the US but I know in Europe you can eat a lot and healthy enough for around US$60 equivalent as a large male. Sure it isn't steak every night but you'll have more than enough meat and protein to enjoy your diet. Clothing is actually dirt cheap if you shop at discount retailers. I don't see why I should be …
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:32 PM
2

Leftist tends to always mean too far left left. Granted the 'exact' definition varies for each person. Some might include free-loaders that vote for social democracy but to be fair social democracy is pretty close to where the somewhat older forms of progressivism would fall. I wouldn't since you can make arguments for social democracy (or better said many of the programs supported) and reasonably back them up with thought experiments or evidence however you are getting pretty close to the all-p…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:21 PM
2

Leftists are people who are far left (and not in any respectable way). Not moderates, centrist or even progressives of just 10 years ago. It's generally a term that is meant to capture people on the left ranging from the censor speech for free speech progressives, through the varying degrees of SJW insanity all the way to the LARPer communists. EDIT: Forgot this. Cool link, I'll have a look through it. Demographics are always fun.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:15 PM
3

Did you borrow half of it from your female friend? The pink shirt and kitty hat look like they could totally be something a early 20s girl might wear.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:12 PM
1

The guy is legit. If you look at his history he posts a lot of valuable content however he appears to be one of those feminist-MRAs that are just as bad as the opposition and engage in constant purity tests and require complete zealotry. Later I recognized his name and the guy got real triggered over some neck-beard joke in some other thread.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:07 PM
4

I was about to say the guy looks like some total leftist but if he's doing this good on him. Funny how you dressed specifically for that and it totally conveyed it. I quite like/appreciate that you took the risk and did this. Although if you had backup that makes it easier. Grab a homeless guy a sandwich for me. I shall pay you in spirit animal shekels :P
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:28 PM
4

Thank you. Sometimes the internet makes you lose faith in humanity or people's ability to reason.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:18 PM
3

I believe it is. Then the persecution of the KEKistanis might hopefully end (or at least we'll be able to throw it back in the face of the PC authoritarians).
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:17 PM
28

And I quote: "Circumcision is neither essential ..." So don't cut shit off babies genitals.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:07 PM
10

Manners when you've been behaving the way you have been behaving. That's a good one. Some excerpts from just the first 10 videos in that list I linked you: I need feminism because I have brain damage #Feminists4Autism Why Do People Hate Feminism #11 - Feminism Is Its Own Parody Feminism Needs Orthodoxy Why Do People Hate #Feminism? #1 - Feminists Hate Men Why Do People Hate Feminism #10 - #Feminism is a Supremacy Movement He sure doesn't sound like someone who has a bone to pick with feminism...…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 07:59 PM
14

You're pseudo-intellectual grandstanding gets you nowhere. You asked for when he has been critical of feminism and I provided you with a link that features dozens of articles with feminism in the title and dozens more in the searches. You asked for evidence and it was provided. Now go cry in the corner.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 06:19 PM
11

He critiques third-wave feminists and regressives as a staple of the content he puts out. Both those groups tend to demonize men's rights activists and encourage behaviour that is detrimental to boys and men or diminishes their suffering. Not that it is a clinical examination of their ideas and a scientific debunk (but lets be honest most of feminism can be covered by an axiom people have come to call Hitchen's Razor). Tons of videos covering it: https://www.youtube.com/user/SargonofAkkad100/sea…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:33 PM
5

If anything we need to meme ethnic KEKistani into existence in the UK. Although that and knighting Sargon would probably make this the dankest timeline so why not get that petition going as well.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:40 PM
12

Sargon isn't an ally... because he's only been calling out retarded feminists and regressives since forever. Or are you of the persuasion that he's just 'MUH RIGHT-WING NEO-NAZI EXTREMIST'?
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:39 PM
1

Makes some false predictions. Projects that someone else isn't an oracle. Good one.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:35 PM
2

I've posted on here before. I do tend to have valuable comments but I also have a lot of memes, shitty comments and the lot. Like most other people I'm not one dimensional. Feel free to go back something like 6 months in my history and you'll find me digging up crime statistics from official govt. sources debunking common narratives. To this specific question... probably not. It's got a target demographic I don't fit into. I'd argue you were doing very well until you insinuated because I made a …
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:34 PM
1

Hillary clone. Feminuts. Nice try. Feminists and Hillary fans would hate me. Makes a joke > must be a man-hating feminist leftist. I post on here heaps and I wear suits because that's what you call them when you have a dick. But I'm not such a special snowflake that I can't take the piss out of whatever sub-Reddit/movement/community I am in. It's funny how horseshoe theory holds up so often. Retarded feminists and retarded MRAs both get butthurt, throw baseless accusations and literally miss the…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:14 PM
1

Bad joke made > do you even have anything of value to contribute. Now that is a nice stretch. If you class it as a cheap shot instead of a joke fair enough, it was in the same class as shitty your mum jokes.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:38 PM
-1

You're definitely butthurt. Read through your response and you might see it. Self-aggrandizement, tired IQ comment & mental retardation referenced. The terminal piles comment makes up for using "butt head".
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:33 PM
-3

Don't expect people on here to think about their 'stand-up' and test every joke in comedy clubs for months before adding it to their repertoire. I'd wager you're just butthurt that the only response so far is my joke response and were expecting more attention and discussion. This sub-Reddit isn't known for having a sense of humour.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:17 PM
-8

Not necessarily. Sure they're intended to be but at times they end up tragic and other times they just don't turn out funny. For every joke that you make that gets a rile out of people you'll make 9 ones that fall flat and probably one that has everyone just go silent, look at you and go WTF?!
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:02 PM
-1

You should've rearranged the search terms so "The Red Pill" was red. SMH. We dishing out blue pills here?
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:53 PM
–

Got to take this opportunity to make this joke. Dat sweet obese virgin neckbeard dick (or the head still sticking out). Don't take it personal. This question just made it too easy to make a joke like this.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:31 PM
1

If he wrote her that he'll kill himself and it was seen that would be where the joke has to end. I actually don't know what the legal pretense for this might be since I'm sure people say I'll kill myself without you all the time and the vast majority of people never report it. My guess is it wouldn't be evidence against you unless you seriously believed the threat but proving that in court seems pretty impossible. You might face some charge for not contacting/reporting it to the appropriate auth…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:02 AM
2

If she faces trial for this be prepared to see trials for any pranks gone wrong or whatever can be misconstrued as 'forcing' someone to kill themselves. This opens up the floor for Tumblrinas to bring you before trial for mean comments online because your mean comments made them eat too much which gave them health problems.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:51 AM
15

They'd honestly call the gang rape of a male baby by a bunch of women a play group.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:45 AM
1

Oh noes persons are dead all the time. So what. This person killed themselves. The girl didn't kill him. ...and yes I know people who have pulled similarly serious pranks on extremely close friends. So no people shouldn't be put in jail for a really dark, dark sense of humour. If it comes out she encouraged him or kept urging him to that would be a different case but so far I haven't read any points like that. Next you'll go full radfem and argue that because I called a feminist a crazy bitch on…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:22 AM
2

How do you know she hasn't had malicious intendt? Currently none has been presented. Innocent until proven guilty. Women are wonderful? Please I'd say the same thing if it were a guy. If you try and ban humour (and yes pranks gone wrong are still intended as humour) then you'll have me as an enemy. 13. Yep, not a legal adult as I was saying. To be fair 13 is a cutoff in some States but usually rests on it being murder/rape (or something similarly serious) or having committed previous serious cri…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:17 AM
2

Not entirely sure what the claim here is. The traditional every man gets a wife views is essentially sexual communism so I could somewhat agree with the sentiment especially if you compare it to how historically only 40% of men vs. 80% of women reproduced and at times this ration move as high as 1:12+.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:40 PM
11

This is a really messed up story but no she doesn't. It is a prank gone bad but I am sure she wasn't thinking this would be the outcome nor could someone who is eleven be tried as a legal adult. This is tragic and I dearly wish it never happened but it isn't an acceptable reason to punish people for what is essentially dark humour. As far as I can tell they never pushed the boy to do anything.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:59 PM
16

Women's rights are definitely needed in the Arabic world however I don't think feminism is the vessel for this so I agree with your point entirely. With power comes responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:44 PM
32

...and they'll find some way to use his death to push the narrative that suicide is so awful and effects women more and we need to fix female suicide.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 01:42 PM
7

The Onion was bought up by some wealthy billionaire leading up to the 2016 election. Thereafter they quickly began interjecting the BuzzFeed style feminism and brainwashing into their site.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:00 PM
16

This wouldn't bother me if it were an organic transition. One where a new awards show or an older one just decides we might as well do away with the male/female distinction in fields that realistically both sexes can excel at (which in my opinion includes many of the arts). The issue is it is obviously done with a very specific ideological motive thrust upon the awards show and they'll be forced to discriminate against men if by chance men greatly over-perform (either by chance or because of oth…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:24 AM
39

FUCK MEN = EQUALITY Social justice for you right there.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:33 AM
1

Well this is good ole Marxism at work. Making everyone equal by dragging them to the bottom.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:30 AM
1

Well you beat me to the 1984 reference. Shocking how perfectly it fits: "Freedom is slavery."
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:21 AM
1

Say it with me bois: FUCK MEN We're so tolerant. BBC, 2017
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:16 AM
1

Ow good. That'll go well with the rape culture they're currently importing.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:54 AM
1

Every society forces people to do certain things against their will This is true and many of these things are things we should oppose. Being required to wear clothes because of 'public decency' is an example. If it were for health and safety or cleanliness concerns on public transport you might have an argument. I'm sure there are a lot of similar examples. This does really stretch the argument. My point is govt. shouldn't be able to force you into association this point opens up the notion that…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:50 AM
1

If you are forcing to do something against their will (when they aren't actively harming someone else) then you no longer live in a free or liberal society. Any govt. that can force you to serve someone against your will is one that can just as easily force you to kill that person or that person to kill you. History is a good example of how eventually such governments turn to the latter. I would argue the recent & previous leaks showing how the US actively surveils all its citizens and has engag…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:33 AM
1

The purpose of government is to protect us from one another. Not 'the common good'. It is fundamentally individualist. Protecting you from your neighbours ill intent. The old warlord AnCap comparison is really tired. It isn't a comparison of any sort. It violates so many human rights and concepts on which governments are built on. Again you have your rights so long as they do not infringe on someone else's. Executions, breast amputations, machete massacres and the likes tend to violate someone e…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:31 PM
2

I get where they are coming from. It is a dark place to be. But if you lose your sense of humour you're usually in for nothing more than more unhappiness.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:24 PM
1

This is definitely a very 'top heavy' field: http://www.everydayhealth.com/cancer/cancer-research-where-funding-goes.aspx Uterine is down at 17 mil while breast sits at 572 mil. The deaths are a little less top heavy although they these two still dominate: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/types.htm
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:54 PM
2

Sure but those are the male and female ones. Or make up the majority. There is also cervical cancer for females which is not uncommon and testicular cancer but my guess is 85% goes to those two 'headliners'.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:46 PM
2

Do you have sources for these 3 claims: Tax paid by sex Govt. spending 4x as much on women's health Govt. spending 8x as much on breast cancer as prostate cancer If you do I'd like to save the sources. I've heard these figures before but never been able to actually find the figures. There is a large difference between breast and prostate cancer spending on average but it's usually 2.5x not 8.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:47 PM
13

Stop preaching the women are wonderful and men are violent brutes nonsense. Accept that domestic violence is almost on par regarding sexes and stop pushing misandrist narrative and promoting misandrist solutions like the Duluth model. Maybe ask why both sexes seem to find it far more acceptable to murder men because they're for equality and big on identity politics? Shame women for being such violent misandrists in hopes of stopping this problem like they do with men when such things happen. Ind…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:42 PM
2

Haven't seen that but then it makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:27 PM
11

I believe you forgot racism in there as well. But remember he is a white man. His death means nothing to regressives. They don't see a person. They only see skin colour and genitalia.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:22 PM
1

Men should aspire to be whatever they want but if they grow to be weak pushovers who don't defend what they love, well then that is on them. No sympathy. Even the most effeminate artsy fartsy man can be brave and stand for what he believes in. He might not do it with brute force and his size instead he might make a song, paint a picture etc. If you choose to cower that reflects on your character. It isn't about beta or alpha it is about being cowardly or being courageous and defiant in the face …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:45 PM
1

As with all extreme ideologies there is some truth to their delusion. The voting patterns for men and women differ vastly and essentially it amounts to two voting blocks who interest oppose each other. It is also true that a lot of the multicultural nonsense and over-arching socialist policies are voted in only with support from women. Again this isn't true of any single woman or man but just because the group doesn't define the individual and the individual doesn't define the group doesn't mean…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:34 PM
1

Funny how Marxism always comes to the same conclusions.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:31 PM
4

I see people are down voting because it isn't a serious post. This is hilarious. They just don't seem to appreciate the occasional shitpost between serious and depressing content.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:29 PM
6

... THE SILENCE FROM FEMINIST GROUPS IS DEAFENING ...
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:27 PM
2

It actually translates to someone that wishes to watch everything they love in this world fucked before their very eyes because they are to weak and pathetic to secure/protect it.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:26 PM
3

Not I'm an MRA but insults are insults. If they hurt your feelings they've achieved what they are meant to do. It's just the 2010's pussy / fag.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:25 PM
1

Nope, I don't share that point of view. Mine is a lot more nuanced I'm simply highlighting how the least charitable interpretation (in line with yours) might paint men equally negatively. In that interpretation you could say marriage is but a transaction. Money for womb. I'd still say it still differs from prostitution since it is exclusive access and also includes access to the womb. However the key difference is both participants would be guilty of poor character not just one. Personally I thi…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:21 PM
1

In regard to the first point I'm merely pointing out that the argument for the collective good is probably the worst argument in history and can easily be used to legitimize any and all horrible actions (as it has so often in history). This is why we in the West place individual rights above all other rights. No collective shall ever have rights over an individual for this very reason because it exposes that individual to termination. Now if you were to argue that the black man is being denied h…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:11 PM
2

If you give the other side no quarter don't expect them to give you any. You called money and having fun gold digging prostitution. Then sex and family is just gratification and spawn pooling. The reality is likely somewhere in between but closer to the inane side. Men want a woman to have regular sex with and take the edge off and to sire their children and build a family. Women want a man who can provide for a potential family and wants to have an enjoyable lifestyle. If you want to paint wome…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:02 PM
5

That's definitely reading into it. Sex is now love? If money and having fun is being a gold digging prostitute then surely sex and family is being a brutish simpleton who only uses her for gratification and to make his spawn. I think we should be honest about some of these realities. Women really do care as an aggregate about a man's income and men really do care about having sex often as an aggregate but you should always give people the benefit of the doubt. This is nothing but biology doing w…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:46 PM
13

Good to know that once 'the patriarchy' is done restricting womens' rights feminism will happily step in to do the job.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:40 PM
30

That was a refreshing read. It is always nice when you (or anyone) catch yourself being awful and make a dedicated effort to improve yourself. It's funny but simply reading it makes me want to pay more attention and apply some of this caution with some of my family members who I might not always treat as best as I can. I try to think before I speak but listening to yourself seems like a good addition to that truism.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:36 AM
1

Well then you are for forcing someone to do something they object to for the greater good. Collectivism has the terrible history of murdering 100 million people for the greater good in around 80 years. Almost nothing else compares. I believe only all of human slavery in the past 2 millennia would come close (and depending of estimates of the Arab slave trade surpass it). Not that I wish to straw man you or misrepresent your argument but collectivism is a slippery slope. One day it is do business…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:27 AM
1

I believe we do share the same view on gender but we do approach it from two different sides. If you wish to read into my economic reasoning feel free to read below although it is a rather long read. To clarify on the previous points. In regards to the previous points governments already scale or have different limits for hours worked for different positions and if you work in your own business there often are no limits. So they very much understand and side with my argument even if they are the…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:39 AM
1

He was saying that he couldn't meet the payments and house and feed himself. I believe often times the penalty for not making child support payments is rather harsh and can be imprisonment. As I has mentioned if he can still make the payments it is a better solution since he has the ability to advance in his career. However before he ends up living in a squalid den or in prison 'going broke' might be the better solution. This does depend on local welfare policies and law.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:38 AM
2

I was thinking more of the men who are the victims but that is a worthwhile observation.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:05 PM
1

When a monopoly exists there would be an argument to be had. But yes if people wish to form exclusively white/brown/red/yellow communities that should be fine. As I had previously stated. Freedom of association. If someone wants nothing to do with me because I am white (as many SJWs don't) that is their choice. They shouldn't need to serve me, I'm happy to buy off the black guy down the road (since you're trying to turn this into some you're racist argument which really doesn't work since I live…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:04 PM
2

Minimum wage is stupid. It harms those with no skill. Overtime seems redundant if you agree with employees on the conditions of their work. If I negotiate someone who has to work 60 hours I'll just negotiate for that. If they find the offer interesting then so be it. Otherwise I'll have to find either someone else or two people. I work hard just like my father did. When you work 24+ hours (myself) 2x a week or 14 hours (my father) every day for 11 years you don't have time. Nor do you have time …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:58 PM
2

That'll just lead to discrimination against people with children or govt. enforced programs that indirectly discriminate against those that have organized their affairs to allow them to not worry about children.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:46 PM
1

I didn't state is as fact nor intend to. I stated my personal opinion based on my belief in the principle of freedom of association. This was at one point very highly valued. We have sadly abandoned this principle and freedom of expression. Honestly I really don't like govt. coercion. I meme about helicopter rides and I do like them but that is a military dictatorship. I tend to be pretty liberal. If an SJW wants to deny me service so be it. I don't actually think we should throw commies out of …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:44 PM
6

Nope. I'm saying family matter have no place in the business place. This does mean that some of the leniency towards women would go away but that should always have been the case. If you want a kid don't work a demanding job. Work something where you have flexible hours, can take a day off, are allowed to come in 2 hours late or can take a 3 hour lunch break. This is really common sense stuff. If you force companies to given women special treatment that detriments their bottom line they'll be fo…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:28 PM
6

No. At what point did I mention that? Neither should get special treatment from their employer although women tend to get a little more sympathy. If you have a kid you should understand that you won't be able to work in an extremely demanding field assuming you're taking any parental responsibilities.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:16 PM
7

Tonsillitis can actually be very debilitating. If you have 5 days of illness a month every month because of them. That also doesn't do good for your body. You should always try antibiotics and other treatments to the fullest extent first. Circumcision doesn't have this effect. 5 year olds aren't bedridden because of their foreskin. There is no proven health benefit. The kid doesn't get any of those benefits until a much later date.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:13 PM
3

Necessary implies necessary. It isn't necessary. The baby doesn't need the circumcision. He will live just fine (better and with higher odds if he doesn't get it). http://www.dictionary.com/browse/necessary
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:10 PM
9

Very mature. The ignore feature is always the best example of I won this debate. Also retroactively responding to every point is also entirely not petty and doesn't seem to hint at some sort of internal guilt that if you were to concede you would be devastated. I don't leave a right to bodily integrity up to the parents. Then people could chop stuff of babies as they please. What would preclude some religious sect saying they believe in the amputation of the left foot? The person should have a s…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:07 PM
3

You called me an anti-vaccer. Their argument is autism. There is a chance that you have an allergic reaction to anything. If there is a high infant mortality rate associated with vaccines we would definitely need to review this. So far I haven't seen the evidence to suggest this (although I haven't Googled it and a first Google does lead me to believe there might be some issue here). You shouldn't remove your kids tonsils before they need to be removed. Doctors should refuse to perform this. Sam…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:04 PM
11

The AIDS one was based on fraudulent evidence. The ones for bacterial infections exist but you can treat those without any permanent harm being done. Therefore a permanent measure such as circumcision is no longer necessary and harmful. Also good job on ignoring doing it at a later date when it isn't at dangerous or when the person although not an adult could at least provide some personal input.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:00 PM
3

Yep, trying to keep people from cutting a very erogenous part of your body off you before you are even aware of it is fascist. I mean really... fascist? As in an ultra nationalist system? Even if I grant the colloquial definition which is extreme punishment for minor offense it wouldn't apply. I never said that anyone should be punished. Simply that someone should be protected from an unnecessary procedure. Except that whole bleeding to death thing. The numbing of sexual sensation and risk of in…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:53 PM
1

If vaccines are shown to do harm then they shouldn't be administered. They aren't though. The whole autism thing is based on a faulty study. Keep trying with you straw mans. Funny how you project so much. Tonsils are often necessary as many children have problems with continual and regular infections that cause a lot of pain. We don't take everyone's tonsils out. Only the ones who have severe tonsillitis... and yes just taking everyone's tonsils out for no other reason that because is a bad idea…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:50 PM
13

Where is the straw man. The baby cannot consent. This procedure is not necessary. It carries risks with it. Therefore it should not be done. If it were to become necessary later in life (lets say there was extremely strong evidence it prevented STD transmission in adolescents not that there is) then the decision could be made then. At that point it carries far lesser risks so even from the point of a circumcision advocate it would make sense.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:46 PM
5

Common law refers to a simplification of English common law which could be at least roughly and broadly summarized as do no harm to others. Came into effect sometime around the Magna Carta. But I will concede it was a poor reference or example. I should just have outlined the statement. Yes, all male babies should be protected from unnecessary medical procedures just like all other human beings. Tradition or the desires of the parents should not detriment that persons health or right to bodily i…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:44 PM
10

Well then we are debating bodily integrity and if humans should have a right to it. I think that debate was settled a while ago but if you have sufficiently strong counter arguments or evidence go for it. If you believe in one then you cannot believe in the other since one fundamentally precludes the other.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:40 PM
1

I think a company should be allowed to state we did not hire him because he had a dick. Or we hired her because she was black. I don't think it is very open and liberal of those business owners but I do actually believe in freedom of association and with time the companies that don't discriminate based on arbitrary exterior characteristics will be out-competed and we'll either have a good historical example or the people who aren't bigots will tend to fair better. Both outcomes satisfy especiall…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:31 PM
1

Ow. That's a good one Tips fedora Whoever made this bot seems like he has a sense of humour.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:27 PM
1

What's this?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:17 PM
1

I meant it as a general concept/idea (and I believe it originated there but don't quote me) but once more thanks for the thorough legwork.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:14 PM
13

I don't think this should be the only argument but it is definitely an argument that should be made. I think some people occasionally mention the business aspect of it for hospitals in that it is a short procedure which generates relatively speaking good revenue.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:54 PM
1

If that is the case it wouldn't be a wise idea. You said you were paying the baseline child support payment and if you lived somewhere where the state covers this if you become unemployed the kids would get the same but you would likely receive something you can live fairly well off which might exceed what you can currently save. In many countries welfare benefits allow you a comfortable life if you aren't frivolous.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:52 PM
6

Assumptions are dangerous. If you haven't verified anything. Even more so if you consider reporting it for some violation of an equal rights labour law (assuming it exists where he is).
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:49 PM
3

No irony is lost. You just seem to not understand the difference between an action and an opinion. If you cut the skin off my pinky is that an opinion? Or would you say that might constitute an action? http://www.dictionary.com/browse/opinion Notice the idea/statement aspect? http://www.dictionary.com/browse/action Notice the whole doing something part? It's not really a cult. If you want to legalize bodily harm otherwise I'd be open to it. I just see a problem when only a specific kind of perso…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:21 PM
24

Personally I think employers should be able to hire whoever they please but usually this has been outlawed in the West. Do you know they only hire women or are you assuming it from their wording? Maybe they want to get more women but are open to hiring a man. I'm not sure on the details here but my guess is you're still allowed to cast a net for a certain kind of candidate. Either way I'd recommend you apply out of interest and check their history. If it seems like they hire based on sex only yo…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:09 PM
4

I'm not rationalizing an opinion. You don't understand the difference between an opinion and an action. An opinion has no physical manifestation. I can say I think you should die. It is but that. Now the action is a different story altogether. We could probably both agree that people have a right to say I think you should die and we would probably both agree that murder isn't good. I don't mind the people who have an opinion that is for circumcision at all. I care about the people who act on tha…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:05 PM
15

You're either for mutilating babies or you're not. It isn't a hard thing to understand. Sure if your opinion is that you think you have a right to mutilate a baby that is fine by me but then people should be allowed to use your logic on you. It isn't SJWy. It's just good ole common law.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:56 PM
16

I simply pointed out that they happily ignore the absurdity of the situation. The one this cartoon illustrates perfectly. Mutilating another human being is not a choice you get. Or if you're really for it I'll buy you a ticket and let me pick 14 square inch area of you we're going to chop off. I have a nice area in mind.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:49 PM
42

It isn't an opinion if you cut shit off someone else. An opinion is a thought and you can articulate it. The moment you cut me that is an action.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:25 PM
8

The most qualified people on the issue should speak. Of course this panel isn't that and is sex selected and selected to suit the current narrative but if it is all women and they discuss men's issue and they are the most qualified to do so then that is fine. The most qualified woman would obviously be smart enough to actually survey a massive proportion of the male population regarding issues where she cannot directly infer or empathize.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:48 AM
2

Imagine the kind of society we would need to live in for this to be a reality. Any and all personal freedoms would be curtailed. It would be the definition of a dystopia. This insane leftist and the one that argued everyone should be stripped of their children at birth are a case for Pinochet Helicopter Tours.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:53 AM
3

Yes. They never wanted freedom of speech. They wanted to have their points heard. The fact that as soon as the left seized power they have tried to silence the other side makes it painfully clear that neither side is any better than the other. Sometimes bad people can bring about good things. I think the free speech movement in the 60s would be an example of this.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:50 AM
6

I wonder if this could ever encourage false accusations... No of course not. Having a quarter year off isn't an incentive at all.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:49 AM
0

What if you apply for unemployment? I am not sure how this is handled but possibly if you're unemployed or seen as not having anything the state will essentially cover your payments? You might be better off utilizing all the welfare available to the fullest extend than working. I'd consider it if it is possible. Don't feed a system that does you harm. Use it against itself. Of course if you can still get by and advance your career it would be the better long term choice but before you end up hom…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:48 AM
44

This is a good one. It is shame when you try to actually argue this with people without extending it much they will usually happily ignore how absurd it is.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:42 AM
17

Well that is because if your familial obligations get in the way of the job you're doing then the company will begin to look to hire someone else. If you're a guy there'll be little to no sympathy whereas if you're a girl you have the protection of being able to scream sexism. Your employer shouldn't be responsible for your personal or familial life. You just have to learn to cut it if not someone who can will fill the position. We shouldn't bully employers into also giving men special treatment…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:41 AM
2

Sure, then I think we would be in agreement.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:25 AM
1

Something I learned the hard way. Many of the doctors I have encountered have done me harm especially in 'emergency situations'. I definitely agree that people tend to look to authority figures for guidance and listen instead of questioning. The practice goes back to religious and/or cultural pseudo-religious traditions. Back then it might have had some basis in anecdotal evidence since circumcision does make cleaning easier and should protect against the transmission of a lot of bacterial disea…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:10 AM
1

Good to know. I guess that illustrates the point as well. Reserving the first row for people travelling with babies makes sense. Reserving it by default if there is no necessity makes little sense. Worth mentioning that Singapore Airlines is also largely owned by the Singaporean government through a holdings firm. Not that it is the same case entirely since it isn't your won government creating such a situation but now a foreign government. Also technically it is one degree of separation but I'd…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:02 AM
2

Definitely religion. Circumcision is a religious practice. Religion is just ideology. The USSR was a totalitarian Statist ideology. Abrahamic religions are just totalitarian religious ideologies. Of course the main point here is totalitarianism if we're discussing broad concepts but in this case we're discussing a very specific thing and that thing is circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:54 AM
12

Paraphrased 'If you want to get good people to do bad things you need religion.'
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:32 PM
6

The child is still thought of before the father. Pretty sure you didn't get the post. It merely highlights how feminism has achieved what it always wanted (but claimed not to want) supremacy. Even children come after women and society has a tendency of putting children very high up.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:45 AM
37

Sadly it did its job. Female superiority with men coming at the very end long after children.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:59 AM
14

Because the baby has a right to bodily integrity and as a parent you don't have the right to decide what parts you cut of your baby. Not to mention that the foreskin has an incredible number of nerves in it which results in significantly dampening their future sexual sensation. Finally it is still fused flesh so it is essentially peeling the skin off of say the first knuckle of your finger and then letting the whole thing scar completely over. Finally you get into the issue of the risk of death,…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:07 AM
2

Almost like there is something to that whole biology thing. But that's probably just my internalized misogyny or something.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:03 AM
3

Just a case of India a country that is notorious for ignoring men's rights in rape trials is now no longer allocating undesirable seats to women. That seems a little like favoritism that women didn't earn. My guess is like most airlines this airline is probably largely owned by the state so it isn't a case of private company can do whatever they want but the state subsidizing the creation of 'second class citizens'.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:58 AM
2

Seriously? Because men aren't larger than women and as such would not only have a less comfortable time in the middle seats but also provide a less comfortable experience for the other flyers? Not that seats should be allocated by sex either way. Just saying throwing the bigger people where they get in the way of 2 people isn't the best idea.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:55 AM
30

Why would you fight for a girl who cheated on you? That is idiotic. She obviously isn't worth fighting for.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/17 06:43 AM
6

Why is it that vegans are so obnoxious. I don't see any other group of people feel compelled to identify with some Church of Food and convert people as well as dedicate their life to it. I could sympathize with the moral argument regarding not killing but vegetarians and several other iterations of people also adhere to such a principle but manage to not be obnoxious.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/17 06:42 AM
2

Doesn't appear to be the case. I got 1 point on my responses which tends to indicate that I neither got an up or a down vote. Not that I would be surprised if I get some down votes for offending some snowflakes.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:16 AM
0

I find that regressives are a segment in libtards. Specifically the SJW we must separate the races again so that the races may be equal kind. Libtards also include champagne socialists, the people who claim to be about the science but then show themselves to have little to no understanding of it etc. Then again obviously there isn't any standard and both terms do just fine. My experience is probably also influenced by the fact that I encounter a lot of anti-SJW content and regressive is the labe…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:23 AM
2

I feel like you called out some giant trolling hoax of future generations. Hacking a bunch of satellites from a rudimentary moon base to broadcast misogynistic nonsense or Nazi propaganda sounds like something the great grand sons of 4Chan might do.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:11 AM
1

That's why I use libtard. Separate them from actual liberals. The political left has largely abandoned actual liberal values and been abandoned by people who actually support liberal values but there are bound to still be millions. A libtard might argue that letting a mob beat/kill someone who said something that hurt a million peoples' feelings is just and right. A liberal would argue that if you had to you should kill all one million of those trying to beat/kill this man for speaking his mind.…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:04 AM
1

Maybe the snowflakes should learn to take an election loss without needing to call the suicide hotline. It is rather amusing how maybe adult millennials behave like toddlers when they don't get what they want.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:57 AM
1

Swedish vikings weren't primarily the raiding and pillaging kind. Those were Danish, Norwegian and Irish vikings if I recall correctly.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:55 AM
1

I mean if everybody has their own personal sex robots you could technically end the spread of HIV/AIDS with that. Just saying... I mean disregarding how obtuse the comment is and that it equates solving diseases with creating a sexbot. However it's funny that this would give men a sex toy and look at how feminists lose their shit. Imagine if men had acted similarly about vibrators or dildos? It'd have been misogyny.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:52 AM
1

Got to love that EKWALUHTEE. They're claiming that women are doing so wonderfully but are totally happy to keep getting special treatment for women. If they actually foresaw that the future would be female then shouldn't they begin advocating against female grants etc. and for male ones. But we know they never wanted equality.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:44 AM
1

Magic. Things don't need to be logically consistent for libtards. It is about serving the narrative. They are more than happy to hold to entirely conflicting ideas at the same time if it is politically expedient to do so.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:40 AM
1

Yes I am well aware of that but if grievous errors in drafting occur you amend or repeal that law. There should also be a lot of review before any law is ever signed into law to try and prevent such mistakes. Something like this really shouldn't slip through the cracks (unless it was always intended to do so). This is what I am alluding to. Something like the Duluth model is a similar example where something clearly immoral is used by the govt. although that is police practice and not a law.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:36 AM
11

Adoption is a unique case where you actively agree to assume the role of caregiver for that human being. It isn't just living with and being with a woman who has a kid and then 2-5 years later when you no longer get along being hit with the bills for that kid. Cohabitation laws sneak up on people and almost no one is informed of them. This seems like exactly the same. Some sneaky laws barely anyone knows about and almost no one enters into consensually that are at the detriment of the people vic…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 11:38 AM
3

Thanks for the explanation. I am shocked that the laws would be written this way and can almost not believe it. Do you have a link to the actual laws? responsibility to pay money to the owner of half of your genes This needs to be codified into law So that this will never happen. the courts can't (yet) yank a random man from the street and tell him to pay for a child because "it's in the child's best interest" No one should need to entrust their safety to the govt. governments have a terrible hi…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:02 AM
14

It should be blatantly obvious to anyone how absurd it is that someone who isn't the father has to pay child support. Luckily in this case the verdict is the right one unlike in some previous cases. I'm aware of the fact that these cases show up in the news every month or so but it does nothing to convince me that these aren't obvious open and shut cases where the man should never have to pay. How you could ever fell such a verdict and not immediately be removed from your post is beyond my belie…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:42 AM
3

Good stuff. Parents should decide what parts we cut off our babies. What a ridiculous position to take. He probably believes that beating your (male) children is also beneficial and his right as a (future) parent.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:21 AM
1

I have to admit I didn't read beyond the headline in this case but I don't think anyone deserves a pat on the back for basic human decency. Not women and not men. Even children above an age old enough to understand this shouldn't get one but it might be worth doing as encouragement and reinforcement to promote such behaviour in the future (at least for a certain time after they discover this notion) Why is that people think you deserve heaps of praise for not being an awful human being.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:11 AM
12

Women are wonderful in practice? A female comedian cannot be unfunny? I'm sure there are some trolls who raid ratings but that is bound to happen to almost anyone. I can't imagine there is a comedian out there that hasn't triggered some SJW so hard that said SJW has taken the comedian as their nemesis.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:07 AM
47

How is this even something that needs to go to court?! If you have credible evidence say 2 different DNA tests from third parties that should be more than enough evidence to absolve you of paying child support for a child that is LITERALLY not yours.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:06 AM
2

My guess is both are largely influence by variable that are poorly accounted for. Women tend to cry more etc.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:34 PM
28

Why do I get accused of man hating for literally drawing all men with a broad brush and specifically a negative broad brush. Bonus points for also being a racist and straight-o-phobe.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:57 AM
2

Such EKWALUHTEE.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:49 AM
2

This trend is actually much older. I think there was data on Swedish men from the 1920s. It is likely mainly caused by the following culprits: environmental estrogens from for example in PCBs and all other plastics. Plastics everywhere. a more sedentary lifestyle. I am sure that less rough and tumble play has to do with it as well but it would be pretty hard to quantify and at least in part is also connected to a more sedentary lifestyle.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:48 AM
14

The sad thing is that legally under the law in the UK for example this is the case.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:44 AM
3

I would definitely recommend you directly contact each respondent you consider including and get them to offer proof. Things like this are far too easy to abuse if they aren't stringently fact checked.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:03 PM
3

Not that I am a father but asking on an online message board isn't research. I do think 50-70% of the responses would be real but the rest might be embellished or outright made up. You still got to do normal legwork.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:59 PM
1

You don't do it when they are babies. You do it early on in childhood. When it has naturally separated which happens somewhere between 2-6. Otherwise how would it be any less torture than circumcision?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:04 PM
28

Why is it worse to sexually mutilate girls than boys? Just draw it back to this fundamental element. Human beings should have a right to genital integrity. We shouldn't be cutting stuff off someone before they can consent. If they are adults and want to undergo FGM or circumcision then that is their choice. Whether they might find a doctor willing to perform such surgery is another issue onto itself.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:14 AM
8

This would be the right place. Men and women who think men and boys are getting a rough deal are more than welcome here. I think as a woman you have a unique position where you might be able to reach some people who dismiss other people based on nothing more than genitalia. Since you got yourself out of feminist misinformation you probably have just the tools to help others see things for what they are.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:12 AM
20

Let's try this with a 50 year old man applying for a job at child daycare and see if the effect isn't the same. Also lets actually do a real test where people have to pay money not offer imaginative bucks. Real money has a tendency of making people frugal.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:01 AM
1

I'd be surprised if radio isn't struggling to make ends meat. However maybe you are right (I hope not). DC is after all a stronghold of regressive ideology. I still think my approach of boycotting the advertiser vs. the station is the better solution. They obviously directly espouse SJW policies whereas the radio station requires more investigation.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:40 AM
1

Wouldn't boycotting the advertiser be a better solution. Most platforms are happy to get advertisement. They don't ideologically vet content most of the time because they need the revenue.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:31 AM
1

I don't believe much in privilege theory. Having enough wealth to get a good start. I'm quite the anti-commie. We just know that being able to feed yourself is a nice leg up. Not that anyone should be hated for this. What strange allies at times we have :P
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:29 AM
3

You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into. Most feminists believe in the patriarchy. It is like reasoning someone out of faith. It is a journey they must make themselves. Continue doing what you are doing. You tend to argue with people not to convince that person but rather to win over third parties watching and or listening.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:09 AM
1

Interesting. I think you should actually call them, ask for higher-ups and discuss this issue. Their tone doesn't seem to preclude helping men.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:06 AM
0

A tight foreskin is a very common issue boys encounter. The 'cure' is a lot of manual stimulation but given the current social climate effectively jerking off your son is a dangerous move. This solution is extremely effective and doesn't require removing anything. You cannot do it to a baby because a baby cannot consent. As an adult you can.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:05 AM
1

Hey there, I can't navigate back to the thread this seems to be relating to. Do you know of a way to get to the comment thread? If not thanks for the positive words.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:01 AM
1

Most of my friends like me for the fact that I don't try to appease. Just on this particular subject some hate me for it.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:58 AM
2

I do not. Where I currently live homelessness is nearly non-existent because there is no welfare state and you need to work for food. Also the standard of what constitutes a home here is pretty rudimentary and everyone has extended families. I do give them food and I have given someone sleeping rough my jacket. I should though. I hope that when I get back to the West I help someone get back on track. I know I'll have to overcome some apprehension but I'd hope I rise to the occasion. If only by s…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:57 AM
1

In regard to vasectomies I founded this view back when I believed we should all not have children because the carbon output of a person in the West will destroy the planet. I don't believe in self-mutilation to heal. Self-mutilation for sexual pleasure I'm all fine with. I don't like people redefining things. There is not medical necessity to impair that otherwise functional human being. Any doctor that refuses to perform such an action is within his rights to and adhering to his oath. I don't t…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:54 AM
2

Fair enough. I am well aware of the fact that if you have a roof, food, clothing, clean water, electricity and US$ 1 in your bank account you're in something like the top 10% of humanity. What I hate is when some SJW tells me I have privilege for the thing between my legs. If they mentioned this I would agree with them. I try my best to remember this regularly.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:49 AM
1

Here is one that was recently posted: http://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/godis/sex.pdf Beyond that look into the effects of hormones. Sadly I don't have the link but there was a study that showed women who do well in math relatively speaking have far higher testosterone levels than normal women.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:42 AM
33

Let me just hop on a plane to give a guy a warm meal? I donate to orphans, widows, the elderly and disabled and I also sponsor children through school and university. I don't think I need any praise for it so I don't advertise it however if you insist on bringing it up... I'd buy them all a warm dinner as I tend to do when I encounter homeless people at night in a big city on what appears to be a cold damp evening, used to bum a cigarette in exchange since it was more communal and have a chat. S…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:08 PM
10

Yep I'm aware of this study. I think the point I make stands. When it is the notion that men and women are different we need some sort of study to confirm this. All the evidence in the real world somehow isn't enough. As if hormones had no impact.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:53 AM
21

What you mean with about half the babies having tiny little nubs and the other half having a slit. Crazy how we need studies to prove these dare I say self-evident truths.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:43 AM
23

I don't really bring all that many causes up. Just call out feminist brainwashing. I enjoy watching people who claim to be open human beings squirm when they have to deal with someone stating opinions they don't like hearing. Had friends who believe in all the SJW nonsense threaten to forcefully remove me from their property for questioning their NARRATIVETM. Guess they weren't really for 'no borders'. You don't get hypocrisy like that for free. I used to always play the devil's advocate anyways…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:40 AM
24

I talk to people about these issues in real life. Or to be more accurate I call feminist propaganda and the bullshit it spews out and point out to people that they've been fed a lie or at best a half-truth.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:54 AM
4

I think the issue is that the rest of society finds the notion that a priest must commit to being celibate cruel and is essentially just breeding abusers. If a person doesn't get any sexual relief their entire life they might be a lot more inclined to do something awry to fulfill the desire that has been building. The best way to make the general public more sympathetic would be to highlight the rate of abuse of priests vs. the general populous. On first glance it seems to be on par: http://euro…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:03 AM
11

While this is funny enough I don't think this is the sub-Reddit for it. Don't get me wrong I had a chuckle but it doesn't really tie in well to the other stuff here.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:54 AM
3

That's a blatant lie though. Male and female brains are so different they aren't even the same shape. Not to mention their weight differ massively and their ratio of white to gray matter differs. So even on a macroscopic level they already differ significantly.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:20 AM
2

Biology is a huge and the primary part however environment does still play a significant role.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:49 AM
1

Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. People don't need to be protected from mean words online. If someone calls you a bitch call them a dickhead.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:47 AM
0

EDIT: OK. Spotted your mistake. You messed that up. She multiplied by 1,000 you multiplied by 1,000,000.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:18 AM
279

I believe that's privilege in a picture.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:15 AM
21

Fuck men. - Sincerely, Society (Prehistory - Current Year)
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:15 AM
8

Imagine the outrage if a bookstore decided to hide all female authors this way... I mean the bookstore owner can do what they please but that isn't really the issue it is that wider society somehow finds this progressive. Instead of celebrating how much these men contributed to humanity and the zeitgeist it is swept under the rug.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:12 AM
-1

FEMINIST MATHTM But honestly yours isn't any better. I have no idea how you got to 7,125,000,000,000,000 from 200,000,000,000. That would be 1/35,000 and a lot more than 211,000 women have been the victim of genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:06 AM
1

Public shaming and stigmatization which essentially tanks your reproductive success. Our hard wiring still makes do what we can to reproduce. Becoming an MRA would likely result in the majority of women avoiding you like the plague because they think you hate women and are just icky and weird so the majority of men wouldn't dare do this.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:04 AM
0

Religion? No. I don't have a sky daddy. I just find it baffling that people will happily swallow hormone treatments when there are other options available that don't mess with your system. I also find it pretty crazy to sterilize yourself. If it were any other procedure you'd be mocked as a sado-masochist loon. To be fair I understand the scope of the procedure is tiny and with modern medical advancements it is reversible in 20-70% cases but the impact is still very significant. But chemical ste…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:00 AM
1

I doubt that is the only situation. I am sure what you are referencing is real such a private schooling for trouble kids (either attitude or mental issues) but I am sure like every other place you also have prestigious private learning institutions (possibly mainly post grade 12). Since Switzerland is rather small and very wealthy it wouldn't surprise me that their standard for public education is rather high.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:26 AM
1

It would be wise to get into a different field if you have a moral objection to vasectomies as a urologist but I'm sure every medical field has a similar example. Also I don't see why he should be precluded from being a urologist just because he doesn't do one elective procedure. There'll be other urologists that provide that service. Not that I have the figures but I'm guessing that only a tiny percentage of the cases are vasectomies.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:21 AM
1

Nope. I do think the West needs to fix its birth rate though but that comes from an economic and geopolitical argument not a religious one.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:19 AM
1

Yes it is entirely possible that 90% of board members are men. Also politicians and that it doesn't come down to discrimination. Simply looking at the data of sex by work field should make it clear that it isn't uncommon to have fields that are 90% / 10%. (https://www.dol.gov/wb/images/chart_21mv.png) Then there is the fact that men tend to spread further from the mean than women. So once you get to very high IQ regions the ratio of men to women increases significantly (this also helps explain S…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:16 AM
0

Was a technicality and wouldn't want the praise going to it. That is nice to see and as I had mentioned Australia does have some protections in place that make it more resilient than the West however it is beginning to show similar symptoms. Some of the things Australia has done to protect itself go a long way and include: strict immigration policies. taking very few refugees. maintaining a low national debt (although it is growing worryingly fast). preventing the sale of 'harmful' debt. A while…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:32 AM
1

Male birth control or birth control in general? I think there are issues to using hormonal birth control and patients should in their own interest seek out non-hormonal birth control both male and female. There are several options that don't use hormones out there so I would always use those. Especially if they come out with a male pill I would be extremely cautious and steer clear the first decade or so to see what the long term effect are. Hopefully there are none but possibly it might mess wi…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:27 AM
1

Doesn't really address the issue. If a doctor feels it is doing harm and it is sterilizing a human then he shouldn't be forced to do the procedure. Soon enough they'll have fully reversible vasectomies so this wouldn't be an issue. A very high number are already reversible if done correctly.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:24 AM
1

'A science bitch'. Spoken like the mentally deficient cretin you are. I treat people and science with respect.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:42 AM
1

I won't make the argument because I risk something in doing so. Spoken like a true spineless leftist. Men's rights is about calling out situations where women in the West are unfairly favoured at the expense of men (with occasional mentions of less developed nations). Social justice is some flawed ideology that purports that to solve discrimination you need to discriminate. HOW ENLIGHTENED. Of course social justice the term isn't inherent good or bad it is just two words put next to each other. …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:40 AM
1

Justice is inherently impartial. If it is not it isn't justice. Social justice is inherently partial. If X people outperform Y people in A country then that is evidence of discrimination and must be reprimanded with quotas, or IAT training. 90% of people on boards are men? Misogyny not that men have greater motivations to accumulate resources or greater drive to attain the highest standings.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:27 AM
-1

While this seems incredibly petty I don't see any issue with a healthcare professional refusing to perform a vasectomy. It can render an otherwise 'complete' and 'functional' human being sterile if done improperly or just by chance. Doctors take an oath to heal and do no harm.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:20 AM
4

That sounds like a terrible idea. Proving innocence can be difficult. This is why we tend operate on innocent until proven guilty. There was a similar case in a college in the US where it was assumed that sexual discrimination was at play but it turned out upon investigation it was entirely unrelated and there was no discrimination at play.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:11 AM
2

I do. It is a pretty simple concept. I also know all about your social justice antics and how you try and redefine words. You're trying to backpeddle essentially discrimination against 10% of the worlds population and insulting 80% of it. The point you tried to make were some mental gymnastics regarding white men having it easier. The reality is the point had nothing to do with that. Exceptionalism is inherent to the human condition. Every person is unique and as such is bound to usually have ce…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:09 AM
0

For one it wouldn't be socialist if we get technical and it is true such things take a while to happen. This is a myth that needs to be dispelled. Social democracy is not socialism. The demographic cliff is the point where it will really hit and the fact that governments and lending institutions have been happy to finance debts that will never be paid off. Things take time. The USSR didn't collapse over night.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:55 AM
2

PS: don't judge a sub-Reddit based on one participant. You know... try and ease out on your painting people with a broad brush as all the same.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:53 AM
3

Well you implied that 650 million people on this planet are somehow inherently inferior or deserving of hatred. All the while implying around 6 billion people are incapable of being exceptional. Don't you dare try take the high road. You know what normal people call that? Racism.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:51 AM
3

Yep very much so. I haven't ever dealt with anyone as intolerant as yourself. You purport that some people are inferior simply based on skin colour. It is disgusting that you think you are fighting for any justice. Not to mention that you are so ideologically consumed that you inject your own twisted view of the world into everything. My statement was an entirely non-racial statement in that some people will always be exceptional. The same way one person is much better at math someone else is be…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:43 AM
1

Who says I'm talking about myself. Heaps of people are exceptional at an incredibly diverse set of things. Also pro tip: women and brown people are also people so they are actually also capable of being exceptional. My maleness and my whiteness gave me a start? I live in a country that is 99.97% 'not white'. Kill yourself.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:29 AM
1

Nope it is about the fact that there is a certain number which although might vary slightly from place to place is the law in that nation. You seem to believe yourself to be above the law. Enjoy when you get fucked by the long arm of the law.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:27 AM
3

To achieve equality of outcome it is necessary to discriminate against those who are exceptional. Many people actually posses rather exceptional skills in at least one field.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:32 AM
5

It is. Social justice is an oxymoron. It espouses equality of outcome and nothing could be more unjust than that.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:23 AM
3

Yep. It is a social justice rag. However it similar to HuffPo does publish some stuff that doesn't agree with its narrative. It isn't CNN after all.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:16 AM
1

Sure it isn't that you're so full of shit that I get comments pointing out how you argue in fallacies. I wonder why my posts tend to expose hypocrisy on your end and why you shift the focus and attempt to ask me to prove something I never claimed to stand for. I've never lived (for any extended time period) in a country where the age of consent is 18 so again your one day point tends to lose any substance. To add to that the age of adulthood (we'll use voting age as a proxy) has also been below …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:14 AM
-1

Australia is one of the few Western nations that is economically very well off largely due to natural resources. You can likely finance such things for some time. Contrast this with Europe and you have a different picture. However if you take a look at the data at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_government_debt You will see an unhealthy trend also forming. Now if I recall correctly Australia did put some rather strict limitations on who can lend to Australia (e.g.: foreign govts.) so t…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:07 AM
-2

If it plunges nations into insurmountable debt that then results in economic collapse that negates the savings of millions and leads to deaths from starvation (something the West hasn't experienced in 3/4 of a century that is failure). There is the possibility of this. Look into debt by nation (including private debt) and for the largest Western economies it is all 200%+ of GDP. You also wouldn't necessarily be dead. Consider that people might have the foresight to purchase such things however p…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:58 AM
0

Ah I was just responding with the first point you mention here to your previous message. Socialist is communism lite. We have to dispel the notion that the EU is socialist. It is a social democracy. For better or for worse. For example the real purchasing power parity in the US for median household income is higher in every state except Luxembourg, Switzerland & 1 more. Again not that I think the US system is perfect far from it but Europe isn't the utopia critics claim it is either.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:22 AM
-1

Universal healthcare fails. Even in the EU. Now I don't hold US healthcare system as a model since it is a nightmare with the average US citizen paying 2-4x as much as the average EU citizen but the reality is it really works poorly. For an example Sweden's wait time to see a doctor is on par with Serbias. Again I liked the old system but it was largely based on people dying young, using the resources minimally and having a lot of offspring to finance these costs.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:19 AM
8

It is great that he has his kids. Always a silver lining.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:14 AM
-1

Fuck socialism. Those policies do more harm than good in the long run. Firefighters: heaps are volunteers and in the past they also existed and they were volunteers. Also a paid firefighting service isn't beyond the free market. Universal healthcare: doesn't work. See the wait times in those utopian European countries. Wonder why people are getting private insurance there? I can tell you why. With a private insurer I get an appointment the same day. With a govt. one I wait 1-8 weeks. Unions: des…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:13 AM
14

While this is a small victory the tragedy is that P15,000 would never make up for 2 years of lost time. Happy to see this was overturned. Nonetheless it isn't a 'happy story'.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:05 AM
-3

Honestly his own fault: "The appropriate response would be fuck you, you distrustful bitch. Don't come around here anymore." If you're too spineless to stand up for yourself then you deserve little sympathy.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:58 AM
3

I've upvoted one thing in /r/feminism and it was something that I think was both in the interest of men's right and feminism. I don't think all that many people go to /r/feminism from this sub and if they do they usually end up banned for questioning the narrative with /r/mensrights cited as evidence of trolling. Feminism was never as great as people make it out to be (violent bombings etc.) early feminist were a terror group using terror tactics fighting for a noble cause. Nonetheless feminism …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:23 AM
1

While I normally find reactionary content dull and lazy this is rather hilarious.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:18 AM
22

Equal pay has been enforced by law in heaps of nations.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:17 AM
1

You're the one who shifted the focus of the conversation first. Since we're no longer discussing the specific example but laws in general. Notice how annoying it is when people expand the discussion. My case was simple open and shut. Of sound mind and body above the age of consent and adulthood. You then proceeded to go on any try and force me to argue the case for or against the age of consent. Welcome to someone playing your shitty game better than you. You're not all that bright and you're no…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:16 AM
1

We operate within the legal framework we currently have. Neither you nor I can pick and choose when a law should apply even if it seems entirely idiotic to us. We also do not get the luxury that we get to pick and choose and redefine any law whenever it seems like it might come in handy or clashes with our current desired outcome. You eventually have to pick an arbitrary number that protects the majority of individuals. I'm on board for going back to English common law but the reality is our cur…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:17 AM
1

Reality also entails profit at all cost. Anything else is simply not a stable strategy. If something doesn't bring you or others something it wastes resources. Charities can't operate unless someone somewhere produces excess utility (in this case measured in US$ earned) that can be redistributed. In regards to the issues with exploitation of resources I largely agree. In high school economics they teach you about negative & positive externalities (side effects) in the first semester and have an …
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:49 PM
10

HATE SPEECH! YOU MISOGYNIST! RACIST! WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING YOU FIRED FROM YOUR PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT FOR DIRTY FACTS! /s
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:29 PM
2

I'd argue that it is the notion that all women by virtue of their vagina are 'demi-humans' who deserve equality but need special treatment at the same time. I believe that women are wholly people and as such should succeed or fail and shouldn't get special treatment. They aren't fucking children. God dammit feminists why do you always infantilize women and deny their agency.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:28 PM
1

Hang on, I don't classify social democracy as leftism. It is solidly left but it is far from leftism. Leftism is essentially Communism but most people (myself included) choose to include champagne socialists or pinkos simply because they espouse the ideas while also being the first people who would succumb to such a system. I'd also disagree. Capitalism would support letting workers manage their own affairs if they are indeed 3 times more productive (and I do believe that such a structure can se…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:26 PM
1

I think we'd have to do a metaphorical leftist hate dick measuring contest. I believe in freedom of association and I genuinely do believe in trying many different approaches so I have little issue with trying any given concept in a group of people who wish to be part of that trial. Social democracy worked decently (although it really isn't all it is hyped up to be) in Europe. The 'real' median household income is generally lower in just about every European nation than any US state barring Luxe…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:11 PM
526

Alright, normally they're a regressive garbage rag but good on them for running this piece. Credit where credit is due. They have done a little to stop mutilating babies' penises.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:02 PM
2

I wonder when blatant and outspoken public misandry will become a hate crime. Not that it should of course. If you want to be a vitreous piece of human garbage you're welcome to so long as you don't actively incite violence.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:01 PM
1

I'm not dismissing it. I do believe investigation is of interest. I just think we should apply the same scrutiny we do to our or other modern cultures. We are outraged by torture and capital punishment even if it is in fundamentalist nations but for some reason documenting for example penile amputation in African tribes shouldn't result in condemnation and disgust. Somehow it becomes: "We're just guests and we're invited to observe their culture. We shouldn't interfere." I'd say if we have any d…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:57 PM
1

No. Just because I believe in an idea doesn't mean I'm a feminist. Really you genuinely argue like a feminist. No, just because I am for equality (the egalitarian kind) doesn't make me a feminist. Ideologies don't have some stranglehold on a concept. Just because some feminist described what she thinks a sexual predator is doesn't mean that I (or any other person) can't have an opinion on what that means to them. It would have been a lot more helpful if you simply said: "There is a feminist theo…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:45 PM
2

I'm not dismissing it. Just saying that the way you painted them made them look a little different. Brutal savages who held their own peoples' rights in the highest degree is more accurate. Essentially just needed confirmation that this wasn't a case of rose tinted glasses. You'd be surprised how sympathetic anthropologists are to barbaric practices when it is a pocket of uncivilized (strictly in the sense of not part of modern civilization) people engages in them and their writings/musings ofte…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:41 AM
1

Again you're trying to paint me as something I am not. I don't even know if sexual predator theory is a genuine 'scientific' theory or a law enforcement practice. You brought up sexual predators and claimed that I must believe 'many men' would be then. I stated no but also pointed out that pretending there aren't any sexual predators would be obtuse. So now it is a money ridden 40 year old? Seriously though so I mention that you should be posting on /r/feminism and the first thing you try and dr…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:23 AM
1

Hey there, I can't quite click through the history of this comment but am I correct in assuming mwobuddy also tried to throw bullshit at you? I'm beginning to think he is either a crazed MGTOW or is on these forums merely to derail/annoy people. I've seen him do this before.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:11 AM
2

I think a "fanatical" emphasis on the rights of the individual is probably the ideal amount. In regards to property I see it as a either already included in that: property that does infringe on other people's rights would clash with individual rights anyways. if you don't have and protect property rights I see a serious issue with protecting the rights of the individual. Decentralization is something I think is good. People should be allowed to be governed as they please. Sadly I don't really se…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:05 AM
2

Yes if you agree to do something then that isn't rape. Pretty simple. You have a whole host of other options available: Kick her out Call the police Leave yourself and let a friend sort it out All those things do not involve sex and were on the table. It is pretty simple. If you say fuck it I'll do it no one is forcing you to do it. Think cleaning the toilets at work or after a big party. It isn't forced labour because you said fuck it I'll do it. "From the story it seems like he wouldn't let of…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:52 AM
1

I'm aware of this supposition. I'd argue it doesn't work until you get into large groups (so beyond the 8-12 member cave-dwelling family clans) and then yes the strong are essentially at risk from the weak. That is why we have individual rights and not collectivist rights because if not the weak would prey on the strong. Tyranny by the majority/mediocrity. In this case weak and strong is broad and far reaching and applies to every field. In some it might be brawn, in others it would be intellige…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:04 AM
1

Neither men nor women should be held responsible for making civilization function. I would disagree. Men do. But men aren't necessarily forced to. It is kind of a de facto development and comes as a consequence of men being more inclined to go into technical and or STEM fields. For the following although I don't agree with the exact way you phrased these things, see some technical inaccuracy or think there is more nuance to it I largely agree with your sentiments and that is really part of the r…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:58 AM
1

Yep, of sound mind and body and above the age of consent & adulthood. She's an adult and I'm assuming you live in a Western country (so I also placed this supposed woman there) she chooses to make this decision. I mean even in most non-Western 'third world' countries two of the following points are still an option. If she didn't want an easy meal ticket for some sex she could: get a job apply for unemployment and other social benefits crash on a friends couch for a month or two. (I mean I know p…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:45 AM
2

I'd disagree on that 99% figure. Modern humans have been around about 200,000 years and just some quick Googling brought up a dwelling around 7600 years old so that'd be 95%. Take this with a grain of salt because comparing modern human civilization with cave dwelling prehistory is obviously a stretch. I'd also argue that family groups are very different from socialism. Socialism specifically wants you to give resources to people who might not be genetically related to you. Giving resources or p…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:38 AM
2

Nope. I'm specifically laying out the chronology. Then I am pointing to your hypocrisy on the use of the term sexual predator. Finally I am mocking you based on your fallacious reasoning.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:25 AM
1

Again with the straw man and character assassination. Read it again and find your error. If you don't work on that reading comprehension. PRO TIP: Read you previous comment for context.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:22 AM
2

Neither men nor women should be held responsible for making civilization function. The most competent individuals should rise up the ladder and do this. In turn by attaining these positions they would gain the necessary authority to do so. Equality under the law and equal opportunity are the tenants. Equality of outcome is a bastardization of all that can be thought of as 'good'. It literally requires you to discriminate against people based on arbitrary characteristics.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:19 AM
2

mwobuddy: Brings up the most stereotypical word: sex(ual) predator mwobuddy: WHAAAT?! You're using stereotypes to describe my stereotypical word. I love how you bring up the shitty arguments and the shitty points and then when you get called on it try and shift the blame to other people because after someone illustrates it to you, you seem to realize just how dumb it is. You brought up "sex predator" (which is obviously meant to be the term sexual predator) and then when someone else uses the wo…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:14 AM
3

Give it two months and QUEUE: Marvel should be sued for promoting violence against women when she is dispatched. Putting a woman in the role of villain naturally enforces female subservience as a villain is 'but a puppet for the hero'. Portraying women as evil does nothing but reinforce the traditionalist notion that women are the root and cause of all evil a la 'snake & the apple'.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:02 AM
2

Ironic how traditionally puritan the 'rebellious left' has become. All those kids smoking, drinking, partying ended up becoming moral puritans who get just as outraged as the religious right used to. They literally used to mock the religious right for these things and now they actively engage in the same behaviour.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:57 AM
7

Socialism is one of the main causes of the destruction of men. That and any other Marxist leaning ideas. Men historically have always been best off when there was freedom and competition and they were given the ability to succeed on their own merits. Believe it or not you can be successful in many ways and the economy IS NOT a zero sum game. You're almost to the point of realizing this since you've clearly highlighted and pickup up on how women desire resources and that the the current situation…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:54 AM
8

Brilliant. Let's hold two contradictory ideas at the same time. MENTAL GYMNASTIC GOLD INCOMING
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:47 AM
7

Brazzers University should be a dead giveaway. This is why 'opposition research' is important.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:45 AM
3

You don't fight inequality with more inequality. Most of the people on here are egalitarians. We don't want women at the back so that men may be at the front. We've tried that and the backlash from that gave us the current problems we are facing. I simply see that in many cases men are unfairly placed at the back and that is why we speak out.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:44 AM
1

It pains me to say but I think you're spot on with this. I didn't even go there. To me it was just obvious that if you're giving an interview you'd want it undisturbed but if someone walks through or your children show up you also don't make a giant deal out of it. What's next? Bring your kids to NASA to draw all over the plans and spill drinks on the electronics? People must understand that there is a time and a place for certain kinds of interaction... mustn't they?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:36 AM
2

Always nice to see fathers successfully juggle career obligations and family time.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:33 AM
1

I have observed similar anecdotal evidence. Society keeps trying to act as if a father figure is unimportant and I think the current generation is an excellent example of how this isn't the case. Everything in moderation. You need a mother who loves and supports you unconditionally even when you mess up and builds you back up. At the same time you need a father who is a little more distant and will reprimand you when you do wrong and commend you when you do right.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:30 AM
2

Nope. They're adults engaging in a transaction. One might also say they are or end in a relationship. Stop trying to straw man. A sexual predator is a man who drives a candy van and gives kids ice cream with sedatives in it or a person who hangs around a club where people drunk heavily and 'buys a round' for some 'friends' that has GHB in it. Honestly apply some common sense. Also stop expecting people to defend ideas you bring up.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:25 AM
2

Yep it shouldn't apply when the victim is anyone (except with children who don't know better of if you get your drink or food spiked and are completely unaware of it). Inebriation is not an excuse. We don't absolve people of vehicular manslaughter if they drive drunk. You chose to get drunk therefore you are responsible for the consequences thereof.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:22 AM
2

No I'm saying that often times popular culture assumes that if a woman is drunk and has sex the man raped her however when the roles are reverse this is entirely ignored or swept under the table. You obviously don't do context very well.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:20 AM
6

You were the one who brought it up. Sexual predators do of course exist. Deny the notion that somewhere someone is preying on the vulnerable for sexual satisfaction is idiotic. I don't think this is the average man or even the average sex offender (actual convicted and genuinely did harm) but since you not only brought it up but brought it up to merely deny the existence thereof I'll call you out on this fallacious reasoning.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:30 AM
119

Why is it patriarchy in a nutshell? Because a father works in the presence of his children? I mean mothers also work to provide for their family in this supposed patriarchy? Sometimes I wonder how much the rise of feminism has to do with a lack of female interaction with their father. I can't imagine that girls who spent a lot of time with their dads would view men through such a narrow lens.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:26 AM
6

If she was groping his genitals that would be sexual assault. Regarding rape some nations have laws that require you to attempt what is within your means to leave the situation (I do think this are reasonable) unless you are under duress. Personally I think one of the greatest issues with such situations is that if you were a man and to 'defend yourself' in such a situation it could very well be viewed as assault by the police/court. It is a very upsetting damned if you do and damned if you don'…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:51 AM
5

Which term? The fact that Marxist indoctrination has been doing one on Western Civilization for the past about 100 years? Or sex predator which sounds like a broken term. I think the one people use is sexual predator. First time I've used it in maybe two years now thanks to you.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:43 AM
6

This is what you get when you put feels over reals.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:29 AM
8

"He who fights monsters should see to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." I know that they do not listen to reason but that is our gain. It makes proving a point all the easier. Now when it comes to destroying people's lives and careers there comes a point where you are forced to strike back but we should for as long as possible hold out from becoming that which we oppose.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:26 AM
16

Now that sounds like some feminist math.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:23 AM
3

He didn't go into too many details but pretty much told me she was groping him and they ended up having sex. This essentially means it wasn't rape. She was groping him and the situation is definitely shitty but it isn't rape. Normally (unless it is a woman) intoxication isn't an excuse (as it shouldn't be). From the story it seems like she wouldn't let off and he was very reluctant and eventually just fucked her to to get it over and done with and have some peace. However this isn't rape. Not en…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:19 AM
15

No he shouldn't. We don't want to stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:17 AM
9

Sadly true.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:15 AM
8

Vile.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:15 AM
10

Funny how that second paragraph is spot on about feminism in ow so many ways.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:37 AM
2

I doubt all of them would be converts. If they act vicious it makes your point for you. You don't have the power and they abuse theirs. But generally speaking out against Tumblrina style feminist always costs you something but there is more at stake. If no one ever says anything we get to where we're at now.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:32 AM
17

Aurora seems like a female supremacist who has little compassion for her fellow human beings if they have the wrong set of genitals. I think he dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:00 AM
11

The way you phrased this title is rather amusing. I think you should talk to them. I am actually quite positive that a majority of the girls there might not have been exposed to a counter argument. Go for it. I'm certain you'll change at least one person's view on such issues.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:39 PM
1

The responses here don't seem to outrageous at a glance. I read something about double standard regarding a child name Dugger and Lena. That seems reasonable. One guy did get pretty into it but the others are simply quoting what she wrote. It does sound pretty bad. You could read /u/SodaPalooza or /u/mwobuddy response to what I said. It shows how it is actually a fairly serious issue (at least by an SJW's standard). Beyond that it is holding people to their own standards. I don't like that it ha…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:32 PM
4

This doesn't necessarily have to be some veiled form of sexism. I don't know whether LifeHack is a regressive publication so it is hard to guess whether this is intentional or coincidental. The woman on the left does look like a confident and competent individual (although her body language really echoes that of a confident guy). The man on the right does look distraught. Sadly the feminists have brought it to the point where people essentially view these things as men vs. women instead of peopl…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:09 PM
3

That isn't true. Being a boy is far more dangerous than being a girl. Something like 5% more boys are born than girls but by the time you reach seniority this has usually shifted to a 1-2% preference in favour of women. Men die more. So many more men die that even thought far more boys are brought to term by the ending of people's lives women outnumber men.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:03 PM
1

I believe they do not know what civil disobedience is. It'll be rather entertaining to watch them learn the actual legal definition in court.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:01 PM
1

They're (Marxist gender ideologues) are losing the culture war. This is them much like the religious right of the past trying to force the young into thinking and doing as they think and do. This only backfires and makes the youth more 'rebellious'. It is rather amusing how the 'moral puritans' have entirely switched sides but effectively use all the same flawed tactics.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:00 PM
5

He didn't say women though? He clearly implied whiny nu-age feminists. I do think that men would enjoy their time more without Tumblrina RadFems around the office. In fact I think normal women would also enjoy this time more. It would go a long way to 'bring the genders together'. Plus the guy is known for saying outrageous things. That's LITERALLY his shtick.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:55 PM
2

Ow boy I read that wrong. My response was idiotic. I read "90%" not "more than 90%". Take two upward yellow arrows as my apology. I'll also amend my response so that it makes sense.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:36 PM
-2

Good ol' Uncle Hotep been exploding KANGZ' brains since a while.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:16 PM
1

So the aggressive and assertive males that take charge can do anything they please and those that do not should be cast aside and left to starve? Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:15 PM
2

Free speech died when PC culture began to become mainstream nearly 3/4 of a century ago. We let it die when we fell into the trap of hate-speech is speech so ugly it should be banned. That's free speech for you. You have to allow and even support people with horrible ideas speaking about them. Unless you're actively willing to support that you're sadly part of the problem. Being pro free speech these days will absolutely destroy your reputation with the average person. Are you willing to make th…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:14 PM
1

Agreed on everything except the last point. If it is government funded it would and should be illegal (at least in any nation that has equal opportunity laws/acts/clauses).
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:40 PM
1

So calling females female is now outrageous? Stop the earth. I wan't to get off.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:39 PM
0

Agreed on how ridiculous the scope of exclusion is. It probably excludes even more than 90% of the men if you include all nations not just developed Western European nations. It is probably pushing 98% since Western European nations account for around 1/7th of the world's population, they tend to be the tallest nations and it would be around the 90th percentile in these nations. In no nation on the planet is 6'1" even the average. Some isolated population groups do have averages above this but t…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:37 PM
6

This is mainly a joke/meme because she confessed/professed that she fingered her extremely young sister (5-7 or something) when she was notably older (11-12). Not entirely sure what the regulation on that would be but it is definitely a moral gray zone. If you essentially molested your baby sister because you were curious you shouldn't be claiming the moral high ground and one of the voices speaking out against 'rape culture'. Personally I do think this is kids being kids and it wasn't malicious…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:19 PM
32

I'm sure she'll enjoy Sweden a lot with that sentiment once the multicultural 'paradise' manifests.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:16 PM
1

No worries. Thanks for the upvote and convo.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:44 AM
22

That quote is very, very fitting. Also very unnerving because it rings very true.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:16 AM
1

Not directly but do work a lot with computers some server and networking stuff.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:12 PM
6

Yep I might circle back and have a more in depth look. Just wanted to mention those points. Often times finding errors is rather difficult unless you can get hands on original data and that is often a nightmare to dig up. I've done this for some things in the past but it is often a multi-day endeavour to find the sources, skim the data and the check it. Hopefully someone else on here might already know about this or look into it more immediately. My guess is it is likely the interviewing familia…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:54 PM
14

There is a 2:1 hiring bias in STEM in favour of women. So that sounds like bullshit. There was also a small 'anecdotal' study that had men and women trial for interviews with a voice modulator. What they found was men did tons better but after looking closer they found this was because women were far more likely to drop out after a bad trial interview. Women did on avrg. something like 3 interviews while men did something like 7. My guess is this study fails to account for something like this. T…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:25 PM
3

Nice homophobia. So you think that men who like dick would dislike women because of this. That is very mature of you. If you want to actually engage with the idea why people are against feminism check out the Duluth model and how supremely sexist it is while domestic violence is far from a one sided issue.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:20 PM
2

Enjoy coding.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:18 PM
16

Duluth model. Would be a pretty 'official' thing you could point to in modern history. However gynocentrism has been throwing men into the meat grinder since hundreds of thousands of years. Men compete for access to the holy vagina. If they fail to sufficiently please women and/or out compete other men that's it for their genes.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:16 PM
8

Gaming has actually been largely feminized for a long time. People have just bought into the false notion that it is still a male dominated hyper-violent hobby because no one seems to ever consider the player base, turnover and earnings of 'casual game' companies. FaceBook games and cutesy mobile games have been huge since ages now. You shouldn't be pissed about people making girly games. If the market demands it. You should be pissed about moral authoritarians trying to curtail and dictate what…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:14 PM
2

SOMEONE CALL THE NEAREST BURN WARD Oh boy that was savage.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/17 01:34 PM
-8

I'm not really buying the whole ADHD thing. If you're going to count that as mental disability then you might as well include everyone who has depression and then we're left with what 30% of new young people not being mentally handicapped? Maybe he has a particularly severe case because in the photos shown he does seem to appear somewhat mentally deficient but that could also be the photo. As far as I know there isn't anything illegal about meeting a 14 year old for a date if you're above the ag…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:10 PM
19

Technically every man who also pays taxes is doing this thanks to the massive redistribution of wealth to single mothers. They've perfected what the cuckoo does to such an extent that most people can't tell the difference just like other birds with cuckoo chicks.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:05 PM
1

In case sponsored means paid for by a third party continue reading. If it means Reddit selected it to be featured ignore the below point. It is sponsored content so it probably isn't Reddit's fault in this case. Reddit is definitely the lefty equivalent of 4Chan but my guess is they simply don't have any policy regarding things like this.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 01:57 PM
1

Again if we're arguing the legalization of cannabis that is an entirely different discussion. This point is phrased as cannabis to help some men as a men's rights. I do not think this is aptly put. In this case it would be as suicide prevention (if it is shown to actually work). Since it also prevents female suicide it shouldn't be a men's rights issue. Finally if you wish to make something a human right you get into extremely sketchy areas. Generally human rights are negative rights (freedom fr…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 01:34 PM
8

If framing all women as house maidens is sexist then why isn't framing all men as rapists sexist. Both are extremely sexist. Sure there are a lot more housewives than househusbands and the majority of rapes are perpetrated by men but that doesn't say anything about the individual. I don't understand why so many people have difficulty grasping the fact that the group does not define the individual and the individual does not define the group however group averages still remain relevant when analy…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:37 PM
25

Real men don't care about what other people tell them real men supposedly do. It is mainly a phrase used by people to try and shame/coerce men into doing things they otherwise wouldn't.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:28 PM
3

Well you could go two ways. The one based in fact and that which is right there for all to see: Frankfurt school Marxist thought specifically neo-Marxism Or the conspiratorial route <tinfoil hat='on'> Kallergi plan Soros & Rockefeller types Bilderberg group / NWO / One world government types </tinfoil hat='off'> The truth probably lies somewhere in between.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:15 PM
5

I don't think that is an excuse to mutilate babies but it is good to know simply from a medical standpoint. If parents insist on such a procedure they should at least know this and double check with the doctor.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:48 AM
3

It has its upsides. I don't think it is everything people make it out to be. I think it really depends on the person. Some people need to go around to find themselves while others can do it in a cave, alone. Personally I'm the latter so I've only really moved for necessity and not seen too much in it.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:31 AM
5

Been around. A few countries in Europe and a few in the South-East Asia & Oceania.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:19 AM
5

That is disappointing to hear. I'm in an international community and just about everyone here either rejects circumcision or has no issue with uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:07 AM
8

Yea something like that. Or I last longer now! It is the best thing that ever happened to me. Since we're on the subject the real world women I have asked have usually never had a preference or had a slight preference toward uncircumcised penises. Anecdotal evidence of course but nice to see nonetheless.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:50 AM
7

Modern 'art'. Ironically I called that this would all end with someone putting shit in a room when I was but a wee kiddie and it came true.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:24 AM
19

That sounds pretty tolerant and progressive.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:01 AM
19

You also get it from a lot of parents who don't want to confront the notion that they did in fact mutilate their child or religious apologist for the barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:56 PM
21

Queue the: It's just a tiny bit of skinTM
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:47 PM
3

I'd say this is a case of correlation not causation. If you're an MRA and on Reddit you're likely to be a younger man living in a developed country. Developed countries tend to be more secularized and in turn people in more developed countries tend to be less religious especially if they grew up in their already secularized societies. I'd also presume that people who are MRAs or understand/agree with the arguments are more likely to ignore the narrative and look at actual data/search for deeper …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:19 PM
15

A lot of progressiveregressive types seem to be all too happy to embrace guilty until proven innocent. Sadly our society failed to instill in them the respect for and understanding of the importance of the presumption of innocence. It is almost as though they forgot that one of the strongest arguments against the death penalty which was one of their rally calls of old was specifically this. How can we in good conscience sentence people to death when we know that people are falsely sentenced for …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:13 PM
1

I put this in a separate reply because it is a little pedantic and uses a lot of abstraction. I don't really think your analogy is the best. Sure you'd put pressure on the wound and then stitch it up later but you shouldn't be leaving knives around to walk into in the first place. Feminization of mental health and the schooling system as well as larger society are the knives placed all around for men to walk into. No matter how good we get at putting pressure on a wound if we keep leaving knives…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 09:33 PM
1

I'm guessing there are a lot of other medications or narcotics that would have a similar if not greater effect. Not to mention it would also reduce female suicide rates by 5% so it isn't really a men's rights issue rather suicide prevention. Even human rights is a stretch. Granted in terms of absolute magnitude that would mean that something like 7 out of the 8 victims 'saved' are men but I don't see why you wouldn't want to save that 1 out of 8 woman as well.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 09:26 PM
2

I think the marijuana use in this case is simply placating the symptoms and not actually attacking the cause of the ailment. I'm guessing that in most countries you can get medical marijuana for severe depression and or anxiety issues or if you can't you get CBD oil which although it doesn't get you high has the calming and healing properties. This is even the case in some majority Muslim nations where there is the death penalty for narcotics. I'd rather see the root causes of male suicide being…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:19 PM
1

Pretty sure y'all was a word people hated from its inception.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:18 PM
0

Aptly named.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:18 PM
1

There is a reason that people photoshop BuzzFeed with 2 SS style zs. They have a pretty clear agenda and they aren't afraid to show it.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:16 PM
1

4r3 y0u 5ur3 4b0ut th4t? At times they definitely should be equal. Equality under the law would be a good example :P
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:13 PM
6

Condolences that this happened in such a way and you also have a memory of it. I'm sure ignorance is bliss on issues such as these. When were you circumcised? People don't tend to have memories of their time as a baby.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 05:33 PM
1

Then you'd be good to go. Good on you.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 05:30 PM
3

Ow boy. That was a rather amusing fuckup. Thanks for the fix and corrected it on the main post. I'd wanted to write NO.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:54 PM
21

NO. Circumcisions are bloody. The penis and the foreskin are attached at birth and only separate later in life. This is how a circumcision looks and it is analogous to peeling the skin off another body part. The foreskin also includes more nerve endings than the clitoris.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:03 PM
1

I think a big part is countering the feminist narrative and even more so their misleading and destructive statistics and practices. I'd probably familiarize myself with some basic anti-feminist stuff and get good at making a short clear response along with keeping some sources on your mobile. The main ones I'd recommend would be: The wage gap. Some good outlines on how it is actually an earnings gap not a wage gap. Some of the more 'knowledgable' will likely retort with the unpaid wage gap where…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:54 AM
3

My experience with TwoX was actually rather good. Initially I was met with ridicule however I was making a radfem fake post just to see what the response would be. After actually engaging with people I met one person who was very becoming and was only continually 'harassed' (if you could call it that) by one person. The pleasant person said she felt strongly about women's rights (however was only a feminist in the egalitarian sense) but was almost immediately banned from /r/feminism because she …
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:38 AM
3

Nice to have an ally. I don't think there is anything wrong with using human bodies to sell clothing. In doing so you essentially always objectify the model since they become a model to showcase your creation. What I do mind is the clear double standard. Women in lingerie: sexism. Men in panties so tight their dick is outlined: DROOOOOL!. I'm not a big fan of Photoshopping to extreme levels nor a bunch of other things that are associated with this industry but I'd argue these likely affect both …
/r/MensRights25/02/17 08:32 PM
3

WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT THIS IS REASONABLE RETALIATION? CAN'T WE? Ow, wait... we're the sexists pieces of shit for thinking that murdering someone for saying things you don't like to hear is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 08:23 PM
1

Good point. The fact that men do not cry as much also seems to have some impact on far harsher sentencing than women.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 08:22 PM
5

A lot of anti-SJWs are de facto MRAs and any anti-SJW who is worth his salt knows that a lot of the issues facing black communities are the product of the bigotry of lower expectations in combination with welfare encouraging detrimental behaviour. The welfare state has truly devastated black families and as a consequence especially young black men become disillusioned and prone to criminality. That the problems that BLM and other neo-Marxist are campaigning against are in part caused by their ow…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 08:19 PM
1

While I have absolutely no issue with women being topless if they choose to be. I generally am very friendly to the notion of people being nude and think that society at large has a very prude and puritan stance on such issues. I think that comparing female breasts to male breasts is a false equivalence. Female breasts are actively involved in reproduction. Male breasts aren't (beyond of course using chest muscles for motion but women also do this). I think a better comparison would be testicles…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 08:15 PM
2

I don't think attractive women are afraid of being objectified. A lot of them know how to use their looks to their advantage and do on a day to day basis. Generally it seems that unattractive women are simply upset that attractive women can use their attractiveness to their advantage (hint hint attractive as well as large men can too) in their day to day lives and wish to put a stop to this. People seem to be happy to ignore that 6'6" guys get tons more attention than your average guy. At least …
/r/MensRights25/02/17 07:40 PM
1

I think talking to them and reasoning them through the arguments would be a better course of action if you're trying to help prevent a circumcision. While a pamphlet is better than nothing it is something you can quickly glance over without actually interacting with what is being said. If you lead someone through these experiences and talk to them they are far more likely to engage with the arguments.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:20 AM
2

That was primarily intended as sarcasm. My views on objectification would be seeing someone for only or little more than their exterior physical characteristics Seeing someone and saying: "My that is a great ass" doesn't mean you're objectifying them unless you'd discount their humanity upon actually interacting with them. Telling someone close to you that you like their hips/bum/eyes/smile isn't objectification since you are obviously close to them and care about them in many more ways than fle…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:16 AM
1

Nice to know it is still common in some places. It is a shame that they attempt to misconstrue manners as sexism. They'd probably see me as some ableist shitlord if I hold the door for someone on crutches. I mean what am insinuating! That he is less capable and therefore less human! Holding the door for the elderly on mobility scooters? Clearly just a ageist piece of shit!
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:39 PM
1

Pretty sure he assumes most people want to fuck other people not peacocks though :P Sex appeal would be specific to your own species in the vast majority of cases. There will always the stray weirdo who gets fucked by his dog or the perverted monkey that tries to engage in sex with a bird but they are the outliers.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:05 PM
1

NO!!! LITERALLY the whole world should stop when a man tells a woman that she has nice legs! THE HUMANITY.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:03 PM
1

I wouldn't say there is a stronger tendency for women it is just women tend to be seen for youth and fertility biologically speaking and men tend to be seen for resource gathering abilities. For every guy who just sees a pair of tits there is a girl who just sees an easy meal ticket.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter