This is a follow-up to an earlier post about "The Hypocrisy of Feminism":
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4pxxob/the_hypocrisy_of_feminism/

In that post, I argued "reductio ad absurdum" (inconsistency) as a method to debunk many feminist claims. Here is another instance.

Often, human beings miscommunicate and misunderstand one another. In gender matters, this occurs often:
* A husband/wife is surprised when a wife/husband walks away, seemingly without warning.
* A man does/doesn't initiate when a women doesn't/does want him to.

In these instances, our feminist society is inconsistent:
* If the wife walks out and the husband is surprised, it's because men do not understand nor "read" emotional signals properly.
* If the husband walks out and the wife is surprised, it's because men do not understand nor "express" emotional signals properly.
* If the male initiates when the female isn't interested, it's because men do not understand nor "read" emotional signals properly.
* If the male does not initiate when the female is interested, it's because men do not understand nor "read" emotional signals properly.

In other words, never does the female fail to "read" or express properly; it's always the male's fault. Sic feminism.