The word 'attractive' is a derivative of the word 'atrract'. Things that attract draws something to itself.
A good looking woman should not have to be harassed daily just because of her appearance. It certainly is not her fault that she is a handsome woman and thus an object of desire to both men and lesbians.
However, a woman who decorates herself in an attractive manner is attracting attention. Such attention, whether positive or negative, it actually being invited.
If the attention to detail has been 'artfully' done, it becomes artwork. Whoever sees it may comment.
I work in security and recently on returning from my dinner break encountered a gorgeous (in hair and makeup) blonde all decked out with a delegate pass for the event I was head of security for.
I began chatting to her about being hit on by guys and she said it was awful and that it was refreshing that I was just a nice man noticing a guest at the event I was controlling and kindly accompanied her back to the music industry party. She was so happy to have shown up with security, but all I could notice was men leering at her.
All I could think was, if she was moaning about all this negative attention, why if you are so upset at unwanted male gaze would you dress in such a seductive manner that your not going to get anything other then unwanted attention.
It's an issue now and I think we need to include the word 'attaractive' into the law. Natural and modestly dressed women should by all means be covered under the new hate crime laws.
But once ones artificially augmented beauty becomes decorative, freedom of speech laws should over ride a woman's right.
We can not stop anyone from commenting openly on any piece of art, sculpture or photo. Why should a woman's exaggerated beauty (be it good or bad) not be open to public debate? I mean, she is out there in the open sphere to attract attention, just as a fine painting is made to attract attention and provoke comment.
Any form of decoration can not be regulated for comments. It is undemocratic and against human rights.
[–]orangorilla 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]orangorilla 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 -1 points0 points1 point (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Heyhidiho 1 point2 points3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lyingcowardly 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Throwaway65472 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link