TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Man sues Hooters, claims gender discrimination. Hooters refusing to hire men as wait staff.

wrez

January 23, 2016
10 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.caller.com/news/man-sues-hooters-claims-gender-discrimination-ep-363379243-316744261.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Man sues Hooters, claims gender discrimination. Hooters refusing to hire men as wait staff.
Author

wrez

Upvotes 10
Comments 22
Date January 23, 2016 2:52 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4290rq/man_sues_hooters_claims_gender_discrimination/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/man-sues-hooters-claims-gender-discrimination.957881
https://theredarchive.com/post/957881
Top posts by wrez

Brown University student sues his alleged false accuser for defamation and University on the grounds of Title IX discrimination based on his male sex, breach of contract by the university and a denial of due process rights

1932 upvotes
October 20, 2015
/r/MensRights

Pay gap? Women earn MORE than men till their 40s: 20-something woman have been paid more than men in the same age group over the last decade

1297 upvotes
August 30, 2015
/r/MensRights

A man helping a disabled boy is tackled by Undercover Cops in a Sex Sting, and his civil rights are violated, unlawful search. Now he is suing.

833 upvotes
October 18, 2013
/r/MensRights

Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape story

771 upvotes
December 5, 2014
/r/MensRights

Media starting to title female exploitation correctly "Local teacher charged with child rape for allegedly having sex with 14 year old ex-student"

446 upvotes
February 7, 2015
/r/MensRights

Two men accused of raping British woman Zara-Jayne Moisey have charges DROPPED after 'video shows consent of all parties'

445 upvotes
November 29, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman, 36, bears child of 11-year-old boy

389 upvotes
June 14, 2014
/r/MensRights

Ohio University Settles First Amendment Lawsuit for $32,000 Over T-Shirt Slogan, after Administrators falsely claimed T-shirts “objectified women” and “promoted prostitution.”

381 upvotes
February 3, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Vedney 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a bit of a reach. Why would you want to be a waiter for a restaurant that's literally known for boobs. If he's was aiming for chef or something then there would be a problem.

[–]123ggafet 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you think they would hire him if he had boobs?

[–]ABC_Florida -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Majority

the group or party that is the greater part of a large group

Minority

a group of people who are different from the larger group in a country, area, etc., in some way (such as race or religion)

Majority in this case is the many Bob, Tom, Steve, Mark and other folks wanting to drink a beer with their buddies after a day of hard work while pretty girls with big Hooters serve them. This is a place addressed to straight male audience. It is not the only government allowed chain where you can have a drink. You chose on your own to go there, because you want the enjoy the features this restaurant can give you.

Minority is this Nikolai fag. He is an attention whore. He wants to be employed in a place whose job description he does not fit. Being a whining little fag he is, he goes to daddy (court). He wants his "justice" so much, that he does not give a shit whether the precedent made by his lawsuit will ruin the entertainment of thousands of men.

Solution: This fag rents a boat, sails out to the Gulf of Mexico. Ties a cinder block around his neck and throws it in the water.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is 7 years old...

[–]ABC_Florida 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

It is as stupid as a woman suing a male strip club not employing her.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

In some retail shops they employ sales assistants as models, so they can fire them if they get too fat/ugly. Strip clubs and other performing arts areas are based on the same policy, where you can be hired/fired for gender or looks. Waiters are not in this same group, unless hooters wants to classify their waiters as performers or something

[–]ABC_Florida 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Then, I hope Hooters will classify its waiters as performers.

Hope one idiot won't spoil the chain.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What a great step forward for men's rights!

[–]ABC_Florida 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is not a Men's Rights issue. This is about an moron. If I wanted to be on the cover of Playboy, I could sue them for not shooting me, but I still would be a fucking moron.

This sub is getting really watered up. It starts to turn into a whining contest, like some feminists places.

Again, that man can stick his fucking rights up his ass! People go to Hooters to see pretty girls with big Hooters. Not some hairy moron.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well the difference is, like said before, playboy hires models which they can discriminate based on looks or gender. Restaurants hire waiters, which they cannot discriminate based on gender or looks. It's not about wanting to be a model, it's about wanting equal rights to employment regardless of gender ie men's rights

[–]ABC_Florida -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

By the same logic a group of men could sue Playboy going against its name and not publishing men on the cover. They can succeed and ruin the joy of millions.

That sucks about the US. Entitled people thinking their rights are above the rights of many more other people. That fag is free to look for job in other places. But I hope he will kill himself.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Like I said like 3 times, playboy hires people under models, which have different labour laws which allows discrimination based on gender, ie to get people in women's clothes to model or whatever they want. Waiters are not in the same category as models. It's a simple concept really: If you want to discriminate like hooters do, hire your employees as models or performers, but I'm guessing they won't since then minimum wage is increased (since waiters have a very low minimum wage and the difference is made up by tips)

[–]ABC_Florida -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then Hooters will hire models in the future too. I don't disagree with the fact that it is legally possible. I only say that it is wrong for society and also wrong morally.

If this idiot wins, Hooters can close the business. Yay Nikolai fucking fag's rights!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

not stupid, a stripper is a performer, a waiter/waitress is not a performer.

[–]ABC_Florida -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes, in Hooters the waiter/waitress is a performer. That's why Hooters is special, and that's why they acquired a name for themselves.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

they are not performers. see the following lawsuit.

http://www.examiner.com/article/250-000-for-hooters-server-ex-hooters-girl-wins-her-hair-discrimination-suit

while the lawsuit doesn't explicitly claim they're not performers, there are liberties a company can take when the people from truly are performers that clearly are not happening here. asking a "stage performer" to color their hair would not be out of the realm of possibilities, but clearly here it was.

if the "performer" could truly be used as an argument, then any company could say, "we only hire men because I like to see them walk. they are performing for me."

either way, see previous settlement of nearly 4 million. apparently the court agrees with me.

[–]ABC_Florida 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My point is that I don't support an idiot who wants to be employed in a chain where traditionally the employees are big breasted women.

I don't support that idiot spoiling a company which is a traditional male space. That whining little bitch can go and fuck himself. Period!

[–]dannyigl -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, there are some laws which allow for this. Maybe "performers" was not the correct term used in the law (like someone tried to explain in another post, but the idea is still the same. I may not word it correctly either, but it has something to do with a certain look being part of your brand. I dont see this as a men's rights issue and I hope the guy looses.

[–]dannyigl 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

And the link thegrimraeper posted above doesn't prove anything. That lawsuit was about hairstyles. Hooters had a rule about color of hair and fired a black girl for her blonde streaks, but the girl was able to prove that Hooters was not applying the rule to other girls. So she won a settlement.

edit: for clarity, typos and to indicate who I was responding to

[–]ABC_Florida -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a 2009 case. They settled it out of court. Basically he legally scammed money out of Hooters.

[–]Supertim1 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, they are just wait staff. What makes them performers? Their uniform? Wait staff in countless other restaurants are uniformed and I can assure you they are not performers.

[–]aokusman 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Clearly an idiot. Hope the clown looses.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter