TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

PBS: Is it time for a national divorce law too?

eaton80

June 27, 2015
44 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/isnt-time-national-divorce-law/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title PBS: Is it time for a national divorce law too?
Author

eaton80

Upvotes 44
Comments 4
Date June 27, 2015 2:34 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3b9l0i/pbs_is_it_time_for_a_national_divorce_law_too/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/pbs-is-it-time-for-a-national-divorce-law-too.976630
https://theredarchive.com/post/976630
Top posts by eaton80

Pre-nup survives wife's challenge, female journalist reports it as "man stiffs wife out of alimony and wins right to throw her out" --> Are you telling us that a contract isn't a contract when a woman signs it?

2043 upvotes
January 31, 2016
/r/MensRights

Women's rights groups to rally against equal custody bill. #Equality

1876 upvotes
April 8, 2016
/r/MensRights

Yeah we definitely have a SJW down vote brigade problem

1655 upvotes
July 9, 2015
/r/MensRights

Teen Boy Will Be Charged As Adult For Having Naked Pics of a Minor: Himself

1392 upvotes
September 3, 2015
/r/MensRights

Florida Considers Ending Lifetime Alimony

1119 upvotes
February 6, 2016
/r/MensRights

Veteran chooses jail over giving his disability money to ex-wife

1106 upvotes
March 1, 2016
/r/MensRights

Connecticut Supreme Court: "A court cannot order someone to provide their former spouse with a better standard of living than they enjoyed during the marriage." ---> Wow how kind of them.

1035 upvotes
October 13, 2015
/r/MensRights

Alimony is a relic from the dark days of the patriarchy. It should be ended completely ... said no Feminist ever.

719 upvotes
April 17, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]bertreapot 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i get the argument that a woman may "sacrifice" her career to raise kids, while the husband pursues a more time-consuming career that pays more. however when women make that choice they should realize that the marriage may one day end. Sally could have decided not to marry Joe and to pursue a more fruitful career. Hell, she could have pursued a more fruitful career while still married to him, she just chose not to. a better answer would be to keep your marriage vows and not blame poor choices on a husband who happens to make a lot more money than you.

[–]xNOM 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In short, having been married for a quarter of a century, having raised four children primarily on her own, and having sacrificed her own career for decades, Sally’s reward in Kansas is to live the rest of her life at a far lower living standard than Joe. Things are better for Sally and worse for Joe in Massachusetts, but it’s not clear that Sally will receive any of Joe’s assets since the guidelines appear to be mum on that subject.

LOL Sally was always going to live her life at a lower standard of living than Joe.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The federal government doesn't have the power to regulate marriage laws that directly. It can certainly deal with marriage in regards to federal programs like SS. But it can't just create new marriage laws that undue state laws. The constitution doesn't grant that power.

So the first hurdle would be a constitutional amendment otherwise this is just an interesting rhetorical point with no way to act on it.

The only way to get uniformity in state laws now is by either privately promoting a set of uniform standards like they have in the Uniform Commercial Code or by tying highway funds, etc to adopting certain marriage laws.

And frankly I don't trust that uniform laws wouldn't adopt the worst of the anti-male laws.

[–]Lrellok 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The constitution does not grant the supreme court explicet authority to decide the constitionality of laws.

A national divorce law would be a lot easier to challenge and change then 50 state laws.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter