Mother files federal suit to block son's circumcision

rg57 · 2015-04-17T00:28:52+00:00

The best argument here is that no two individuals can contract between themselves to cut a third individual.

That third individual's own health care and individual rights overrides any contract.

Parents don't own children. They have responsibilities to children.

xNOM · 2015-04-16T19:29:46+00:00

Go mom!

SocietalDisgrace · 2015-04-16T20:59:47+00:00

She became educated and changed her mind. I hope the law sides with her.

constructivecritism · 2015-04-17T11:01:33+00:00

Why don't they call it what it is? It's male genital mutilation.

autotldr · 2015-04-16T17:53:20+00:00

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 84%. (I'm a bot)

A 2012 court-approved "Parenting plan" - signed by Hironimus - allowed Nebus to arrange for a circumcision.

In the federal lawsuit, Hironimus and her attorney, Thomas Hunker, call the procedure "Elective" and "Cosmetic," and said the boy currently lives in fear about having a circumcision performed.

Nebus testified in court in 2013 that he wanted his son to get a circumcision after noticing that he was urinating on his leg.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top five keywords: circumcision^#1 Nebus^#2 Hironimus^#3 boy^#4 court^#5

Post found in /r/news and /r/MensRights.

Title	Mother files federal suit to block son's circumcision
Author	AndaliteBandit
Upvotes	44
Comments	6
Date	April 16, 2015 5:23 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/32traz/mother_files_federal_suit_to_block_sons/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/mother-files-federal-suit-to-block-sons.982879 https://theredarchive.com/post/982879

Comments