An honest question | AntiFeminists

[–]Ralph_Marbler 71 points72 points73 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 60 points61 points62 points 5 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

[–]StrawhatMucci 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are more driven, well, it's indeed what I was saying in my post. Only, you can't reduce men at that. It's ridiculous! It's totally untrue that we're only sex crazed maniacs who only have sex in mind. In fact it's bullshit (sorry for the french). I'd even go further in saying that men's love is usually much deeper than women's. Women, when they stop admiring you, when you lose your job, etc, women can just seemingly stop loving you. Such things rarely happen in men.

Create a tinder as a woman? Yes, sure, men love beautiful women. Once again, I'm not denying that. What I'm saying is that women are also driven, except that they are more hypocritical about it, and then pretend to be more virtuous than we are. The simple fact that so many women create, yes! tinder to show their bodies, the fact that so many use instagram, etc, to show their beauty, IS in itself a manifestation of desire and sexuality. It's just not as overt, not as frank as in men.

As to the difference you make between first world countries and others, I'm not sure it's so relevant here. Sub-African women are in many countries VERY sensual, and much more overtly than women here. In many other countries, they are repressed, so it's not pertinent to the question, imo.

[–]Dunkopa 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know if the correct way to say this is "Men are more driven."
It's more like men usually have a larger scale and women have a smaller scale when it comes to attraction. I think there are two main reasons.

Men can be attracted to almost any women and this makes their sexual drive more active while women seem to be attracted to a much smaller group of men, so their sexual drive is more passive. This explains why men seem to have a sexual desire to a greater amount of women than women do to men.

Another reason is that men always produce sperm but women produces eggs only in a specific time of the month. So while men are always ready to reproduce, women are only in a particular time. This makes men almost always have a high sexual drive while women only have a high sexual drive only in, again, a particular time of the month.

[–]Starmind0 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Oh! I think we have a feminist among us!

Why? I suppose you think there are no "real" differences between the 2 sexes, right? I love that kind of denial of biology! It's in front of your nose! But... "nope, doesn't exist". Or either: "nope, it exist a little, but has no impact".

Men and women ARE different. Profoundly different. We are a specie in which sexual dimorphism is very considerable, not so much in size, but tremendously in shape. You can't tell the difference between a female and a male dog or cat from a superficial look. With humans, it's impossible not to. And the impact of our differences on behavior is also considerable. You can try to negate that day and night for a million years if that comfort you. But it just isn't factual, and facts are in front of your face, in any biology or medical manual. It's not even problematic in any way.

[–]Starmind0 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Lmao calling me a feminist just because I said men and women aren't that different to make yourself sound right, you're pathetic.

Men and women aren't that different, sorry not sorry. Humans are listed as one of the least with apparent sexual dimorphism, actually. And human behavior is based on their environment and education, which is why we constantly tell kids to be good so they grow up and be good. So logically, telling boys and girls they're different and "should act different" will result in them actually behaving differently, then lowlifes like you justify your own words with that result until it becomes a never ending cycle of sexism and justification of sexism. By the way, Anti feminism is meant for MRAs and people who want to put an end to misandry by feminists, not a place for traditionalists like you to lurk in thinking anti feminism is anti equality lmao. Shoo piggy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Hey! mate, why the insults? You can explain yourself without using insults, can't you? And you certainly can't call others "pathetic", "piggy" and "lowlife" if that's what YOU do.

So if we don't acknowledge biology, we perpetuate " a never ending cycle of sexism and justification of sexism "? That's all you have in front of countless pages of bio texts and studies, and in front of what you can see with your own eyes? Really?

Mate, acknowledging reality is not sexist. Reality is not sexist. "Sexist" is a value YOU attribute to reality. Reality in itself is neutral.

What I see here, is a kid who repeat like a parakeet a lesson well learned and who can't even start to think on his own.

Now what you are defending is the very core of feminism. That's their base, their starting point. It was inspired by Sartre (through his gf Simone de Beauvoir), by Margaret Mead (who's work has been thoroughly debunked since then) and John Money (who's work has also been debunked, especially the case of David Reimer). In other words, YOU are a feminist. You might deny it, you might not know it or realize it, but that's what you are. And you also show the hatred feminists have for anything that differs from their dogmas. So, I'd be careful calling other pathetic...

[Edit: orthography]

[–]Starmind0 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Once again, typical feminist hatred, and defense of dogma without ANY discussion. Childish insults. "Piggy subhuman"?

Yes, I defend biology and science. Women and men are very different. To take just one simple, but devastating example for your dogma, we have a whole different set of hormones that acts completely differently on the body and on behavior. And if biology manuals are not sufficient for you, just go listen to the video journal of any transsexual woman on hormone replacement therapy. There are countless on youtube. All say the same things: the difference is enormous in their daily life.

I never said that "sexism is natural". It was not difficult to understand. Sexism is a human value. It's not a characteristic of reality. That's obvious to anyone with a bit of intelligence who's not brainwashed.

The rest of your intervention is disgusting hatred and insults I won't even grace with a word.

Once again, YOU are a feminist. I don't know why you refuse to acknowledge that. You defend exactly the same position. And it's all dogma to you, completely out of any discussion, enough to just call people who differ in opinion "subhuman", like you just did to me. You're not well, mate.

[–]Starmind0 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

What have I said that is "sexist"? To you and your dogma, stating differences is sexist. But otherwise, anything I said? If so, quote me.

I quote you: Men and women don't have different hormones they have different LEVELS of the SAME hormones which exist because men and women have different genitals that function with different hormones. And of course hormones will change anyone who takes lots of doses or has little of said hormones. This could have been written by a children.

Ehrm... no, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are not the same as estrogen and progesterone. Not at all.

Yes, women and men have different genitals. I'm glad you acknowledge that much. You took one obvious step towards genius. But what produces sexual hormones is not "the genitals". It's first commanded by the hypothalamus. The sexual hormones themselves are created by testicles or ovaries. As I can't imagine you don't know, these organs fulfill very different functions and produce very different gametes. They also have very different effects on the body and the behavior, distribution of fat, hair, muscle mass, thickness of the bones, weight and height, skin, facial traits and countless others well recognized, once again, except for deniers, by the most basic biology.

So you then say: And of course hormones will change anyone who takes lots of doses or has little of said hormones. Which seems to contradict many of your previous statements. But the problem here is mainly that you suggest such difference is caused by the "amount" of hormones taken. Nope. Transsexual women are not given "more" hormones than the level a normal woman would metabolize. Of course not. To what you ridiculously add: Simple biology. That's quite funny, since you've been negating it since the beginning. What's up, mate, are you turning evil "traditionalist" yourself? Yes, it is simple biology, but I observe it's not simple enough for you.

Feminine men exists, you then say, even with testosterone. What's a feminine man? You're not defining your concept. Some demeanor that might be identify as feminine are probably cultural. But no man with normal level of testosterone will have female features, and vice versa for women and estrogen. You don't make any sense.

And then you end this nonsense up with the meaningless insults, pretending you understand "the evil message behind my words", stating banal biological facts, and not concealing anything else than what it says.

And calling me "honey". What's that? An invite? No thanks, bud.

Btw, no, I'm not "using big words". lmao! If some of these words seem "big" for you, I apologize. I have understood from the start you could have problem with those and I try to keep it as simple as possible.

[Edit: one word which was a mistake]

[–]Starmind0 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sexist by treating men and women differently, simple as that. "Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are not the same as estrogen and progesterone" When did I fucking say they're the same? I said men and women have the same hormones as in women have testosterone and men have estrogen too, ignorant traditionalist. Both of them have both hormones, the difference is the LEVELS of those hormones. The RATE.

"what produces sexual hormones is not the genitals" "The sexual hormones themselves are created by testicles or ovaries" .......I'm just gonna ignore the hypocrisy there. Anyways, all of the things that change the body that you mentioned are not up to gender, they're up to an individual's own biology.

"Which seems to contradict many of your previous statements" Quote me bitch. I cringed enough from you, present a fact for once.

"No man with normal levels of testosterone will have female features" Except they already did, cause they're not female features. Too bad, reality went straight to your forehead.

I argued with a lot and lemme tell you, so far you're one of the dumbest and most boring too. Lmao 2 different species because of genitals. What an utter joke and disgrace to humanity. Please, educate yourself with reality and human way of understanding, cause traditionalism will only make you dumber than you already are.

[–][deleted]2 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That has to be one of the funniest thing I've seen in a while. You made my day. About hormones: When did I fucking say they're the *same*? I said men and women have the *same* hormones. Where did you say that? Well, just your next sentence, to take this example out of several.

No, once again, women and men don't have the same hormones. And technically, yes, you're right, both have a bit of the other's hormone but at a very small level, and it's not really pertinent to the discussion. Female testosterone only comes from their adrenal glands. Males produce the same level from their adrenal glands as well. We're not quite sure what role it has, especially in women. Some think it's related to women's desire, but it's not well establish. Studies indicate that estrogens have the greater role in women's desire and it coincides largely with the testimony of transsexuals that have gone through srs. As to estrogen in males, we know it only has a function on the genitals at the time of an ejaculation. But nothing else on the body that we know precisely. Real hormonal effects are produced by androgen on men and estrogen/progesterone on women.

So this idea you have, that it's just a matter of level is wrong. It has nothing to do with sexual differences. You probably saw somewhere that we had both and you either concluded erroneously or misunderstood what was said.

Quote: I'm just gonna ignore the hypocrisy there. Anyways, all of the things that change the body that you mentioned are not up to gender, they're up to an individual's own biology. What's hypocritical about stating that "the genitals" are not producing the hormones? Hormones are produced after a chain emission of substances starting from the commanding hypothalamus to the hypophysis to the gonads, which are differentiated in males and females, of course. Gonads are not "the genitals". Fact.

Quote: Anyways, all of the things that change the body that you mentioned are not up to gender, they're up to an individual's own biology. Once again, you fail to define your concepts. "Gender"? I'm sure you intend by that the so-called expression of sexual identity created by culture. Right? "An individual's own biology". And here we go again, you at the same time deny and affirm the reality of biology. It would be nice if you would make your mind. And I suspect once again you're leaning towards evil traditionalism. Trying my best to understand that gibberish, I suppose that you mean: "there is a difference between the gender as someone's expression of his sexual identity with the changes occurring biologically to the body". I don't have a problem with that, really. Of course, men and women, despite their biology, express their identity in very diverse ways. But that's where things often seem to stop making any sense anymore: it's not because you can express yourself differently that the sexes find themselves negated or irrelevant. That's the abuse I think the feminist ideology -you swallowed without water- commits. Moreover, there is no substrate whatsoever to the notion of "gender". As far as I'm concerned, there is no such thing, because it doesn't refer to anything positive or corporeal. I have no quarrel with the expression in principle. But opposing sex and gender is ridiculous, since they belong to two different logics. Biological sex is simply undeniable. Gender is something in your mind, subjective, something you decide on. One has nothing to do with the other, and the later certainly can't undermine the realm of the former. Your psyche is a product of your biology. Not the opposite.

Quote: "Which seems to contradict many of your previous statements" Quote me bitch. I cringed enough from you, present a fact for once. I don't need to bother. Only you would fail to see you contradict yourself from one sentence to the next... Find at least an example above.

Quote: "No man with normal levels of testosterone will have female features" Except they already did, cause they're not female features. Too bad, reality went straight to your forehead. - Absolute gibberish. I won't even try to decipher that. How old are you? 14? Do you go to school?

And you once again end up with childish, stupid, useless insults, outside implying that I said anywhere that men and women belong to 2 different species. Yet, this is quite indicative of your logic. If you say women and men are different to you and your feminist peers, it would mean they belong to 2 different species. It's so absurd one doesn't know how to take this. Sexual dimorphism is present everywhere in nature. Sexual differences responds to the origin of sexuality, which simply was to diversify the gene pool. That's all. Without that, evolution would be impossible for animals as big as ourselves with a slow rate of procreation. All of that is once again absolutely basic biology. And you're telling me to go "educate myself"! You can't even write a proper sentence!

[–]Starmind0-1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Look back and you'll find it, ignorant.

"Technically yes" Honey there's no technically here, men and women factually have the same hormones but on different levels. And it's relevant to show your ignorant self that men and women don't have entirely different functions. "That it's just a matter of level is wrong" Except it isn't. We both know you're dumb, but at least act smarter than that.

I don't care how the hormones start, thats irrelevant, the point is they're produced in testes or ovaries.

"I'm sure you intend by that the so-called expression of sexual identity created by culture" When did I fucking say that? You're now using dumb strawman arguments to save yourself from your sad position. And sorry not sorry, but gender and sex are the same. Nothing is in the mind.

"I don't need to bother" In short, "i lied and have no proof of my claims".

" won't even try to decipher that" Ya cause you can't. Thousands of feminine men exist and lots of them look MORE feminine than women. It's called having their own biology, not up to gender.

The differences you blather so much about are minor by products. I never said acknowledging some differences in men and women ultimately makes them 2 different species, its YOUR take, the ignorant and sexist traditionalist take on this, that make men and women sound like 2 different species. You literally said it yourself, "men and women are different in EVERYTHING" if they're different in everything then what the fuck do they share as both human beings? Just the label? No. They're not different. And to say they're not different doesn't mean they don't share differences like genitals, it means they shouldn't be separated based on irrelevant things. You even believe they have different mindsets instead of acknowledging that that's merely the result of our sexist society.

[–][deleted]1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I quit. I'm done.

Kid, you are so dumb you're almost a clinical case. I've seen some discussion with you, here, before: you are almost always fighting heinously with everyone you exchange with! You have more issues than just a terribly low intellect. You can't hardly formulate a sentence. You have no mastery of punctuation, you can't get any complex idea across, your syntax is so awful one wonders if you've completed your middle school. And you don't even understand what people say even when they agree with you (there's one immediate case in my previous post you didn't pick, although it was partial agreement only - but you don't even understand that! You can't!)

You have no understanding of biology and bodily functions, no understanding of science. The way you try to convince yourself of the opposite is comical and ironic. Everyone who will read you here will have a good time and a good laugh - or either pity. The insults you use in every post are already, in themselves, a tell of your inner feelings of inadequacy and intellectual mediocrity. And you are right indeed to feel that way.

But what surprises me the most is your hatred. You remind me of these "Antifa" and SJW people. It's not about discussion and learning, to you people. You have your dogmas, and anyone who differs is (I quote you) subhuman. You pretend to be a defender of humanity raising against some narrow people, "traditionalists" or what have you, which are all ridiculous embodiment of fears, because in the end, all there is around, is a surrounding of people, ordinary people with diverging opinions and feelings. That's why centuries of politics have lead us to democracy, the way of politically evolving by exchanging.

But no, that's not you. You are a fanatic. Every person not thinking like you should be burned as a subhuman. You are exactly what the Nazis were. Exactly what Islamists are. Exactly what any crazy, murderous fanatic have been in the past, a Khmer Rouge, a Chinese Cultural Revolution Red Guard soldier, a Stalinist shill, a SS brigadier, an Iconoclast, an Inquisition "investigator". You are part of the worst humanity has to offer, and in your case it's real, because you see others as non humans. It's not surprising, on the other hand. These groups are always seeking and recruiting among ill-educated, weak-minded individuals, that do not have the capacity to think on their own.

I'll end up with feminism. You share exactly their views. And you don't recognize yourself as such. Why? Because you're a guy? Because you side up with MRA movements? But you think exactly like the most intolerant, hateful feminists! You hold on to the same theories that were based on bodies or work debunked and even laugh at everywhere (Margaret Mead's, Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir's, John Money's). What's the use? You're not helping men by espousing the ideology of people who vows to hate them! lol But I know you won't see that. You were brain washed somewhere and you don't have the capacity to even envision exceptions to your adopted or inflicted narrative.

I was very tempted to insult you also, to retaliate in kind. But you're not worth the energy, and I suspect that you suffer enough on your own. Yeah! I know. You will say "no, I don't". But no one with so much hatred and frustration is a sane, happy, well-balanced person. People won't tell you because as I said, they all feel you're not worth it, but man! it shows, it's obvious, a shrink is not necessary here, it's up for anyone to see. Suffice to read anything you write. And once again, it's not just with me. I see many instances on this subreddit where you fight with the same hatred, and even worse, anyone you exchange with! What, you are on to correct the entire humanity because they're not as brainwashed as you are? And the thought that there's something wrong with that doesn't occur to you?

There I am trying to reason with you again. You're really not worth it. Good bye, dumb kid! The rest of the ride will be hard for you. Good luck. I'm mentioning luck because dumb people have a lot of it. So who knows?

[–]Starmind0-1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

And almost all kept blathering instead of focusing on the point. Cry harder.

You're desperate to be right which happens with people who get strongly debunked. You cared enough to write a false diagnosis that did nothing but make me pity your stupidity since it's below average for a, supposedly, human. You haven't figured it out yet, but I don't have respect for idiots like you who disrespect the very thing that makes you human. You focused on grammar and insults rather than the whole point but that was only to be expected from your kind. You claim I call anyone I disagree with names, and yet with one comment you managed to come to the conclusion that I'm a feminist? Everything you said is entirely against you, which makes sense since we are our own understanding. I don't give the slightest micro fuck, my dear, and you should know that since you took a look at my comment history that lemme tell you, I'm proud of. Feminists are those misandristic women-worshippers, not people who are against the sexism and bullshit of shitty traditionalists like you who belong in the past. I don't have to face hate to hate your likes, I simply have empathy for my fellow humans therefore I hate what they go through which are, in this case, men. So keep your smart wannabe attitude to yourself, focus on the point, or leave.

[–][deleted]1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Seszer-06 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]Seszer-06 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Seszer-06 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Seszer-06 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Werwet10 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Seszer-06 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pootis-man173 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]pootis-man173 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]thegraveyardcat 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]CheapOpposite 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Itneverbegancel 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Yolttic 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lonystal 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]LittleYellowConure 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]qizhNotch 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]ISEVERNAMEALREDYTAKE -17 points-16 points-15 points 5 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

[–]John70333 5 years ago [recovered] (37 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703335 points 5 years ago [recovered] (25 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]John70333-1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703330 points 5 years ago [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]John70333 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate2 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]John703331 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]John703331 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Silverpixelmate1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Reddit-Book-Bot 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Starmind0 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703334 points 5 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]Starmind0 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703332 points 5 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Starmind0 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703331 points 5 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Starmind00 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]John703332 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Starmind01 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]John703331 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Starmind00 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]John703331 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Starmind01 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[+]BlessYourFaces -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703338 points 5 years ago [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

[+]BlessYourFaces -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703337 points 5 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]BlessYourFaces -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]John703333 points 5 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]BlessYourFaces 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You would be called a feminist before women were allowed to vote, is what I'm saying. Throughout history, it has taken strong men and women to fight for better rights for women. Morals constantly change as society progresses. It wasn't long ago that a man could beat his wife and not go to jail.

There has always been a reactionary opposition that inevitably loses. You're a part of that opposition presently.

Abortion is a complicated topic, but you have to look at it from a consequentialist standpoint. If you disallow women from having abortion, it leads to growth in human suffering overall.

Kids growing up in families who do not want them, already impoverished parents that have to provide for a child they accidentally had due to malfunction of contraceptives, skyrocketing amounts of orphans who grow up alone and without a family. Things are never as simple as "murder is wrong".

[–]John703333 points 5 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]BlessYourFaces1 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Biblical morals absolutely do change. There are hundreds of example of that. The following passages are from Jesus Christ himself and have been used by the Confederacy to justify slavery.

"You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way." Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT

"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Ephesians 6:5 NLT

Thankfully we don't base modern morality on a singular religion's code.

[–]John703331 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I think you haven't read the Bible much. The first passage u quoted was said by God to the Israelites before the incarnation of Christ. The Law given to Moses was meant to cleanse the Israelites to prepare a nation for Christ to be born here. Till God's plan of salvation was fulfilled, only the Israelites were 'God's people' and so God allowed them to take foreigners as their slaves. But they weren't allowed to mistreat slaves beyond a limit.

After the fulfillment of God's salvation by Jesus' sacrifice on the Cross, there is no distinction between Jews and Gentiles or men and women or masters and slaves etc because our souls are equal in the eyes of God and all who accepts His salvation are God's people now. But God forbids all kinds of violence among His people and therefore He advises the slaves/bond servants to obey their earthly masters without rebellion. People might misuse God's word for their own selfish interests. But that doesn't mean God encourages slavery.

Matthew 8,11-12 - But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Jesus showed us the path of love and humility and that's the ideal path for us to follow. We're no longer under the Law given to Moses if we accept Christ's salvation.

[–]Ralph_Marbler 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Man, you gotta understand feminists never gave a fuck about gender equality. They are lying to you, they're using that excuse as a decoy.

They want to turn men into simps, humiliate them and make them lose their masculinity. Heck, they even consider masculinity as "toxic", which proves they fucking hate men. If you resist, they will psychologically harm you, they will shame you, insult you, make your life hell and even drive you to suicide.

They have taken control of social media, news, TV, radio, and even of the law and the justice. To give you an example, for the same crime committed under the same circumstances, a man as a 63% chance to get a heavier sentence than a woman. Women can rape or kill people, but nobody will notice and nobody will give a fuck about it.

This is what's up with feminism: making the society unbearable for men. For revenge. And unless you have Stockholm syndrome, you don't want to support feminists. Think about that, mate, because unlike feminists and feminazis, I don't force my opinion on others.

[–]CoolDownBot -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]FuckCoolDownBot2 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck Off CoolDownBot Do you not fucking understand that the fucking world is fucking never going to fucking be a perfect fucking happy place? Seriously, some people fucking use fucking foul language, is that really fucking so bad? People fucking use it for emphasis or sometimes fucking to be hateful. It is never fucking going to go away though. This is fucking just how the fucking world, and the fucking internet is. Oh, and your fucking PSA? Don't get me fucking started. Don't you fucking realize that fucking people can fucking multitask and fucking focus on multiple fucking things? People don't fucking want to focus on the fucking important shit 100% of the fucking time. Sometimes it's nice to just fucking sit back and fucking relax. Try it sometimes, you might fucking enjoy it. I am a bot

[–]Ralph_Marbler 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ShitPissCum13122 points 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]FuckThisShitBot411 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Hell-no… I noticed that you dropped your Fucking brain, This shit is fucking useless bullshit spam, so the fuck are you trying to achieve here? Most swear words used on reddit are for emphatic swearing, basically swearing to emphasize the fucking point. Because Reddit is not a serious environment, this is the place to express yourself, to express your views and opinions with everyone, and a place of fun and relaxed discussion, this is not a fucking school, nor is it a fucking business meeting, you fucking brainless spineless motherfucking snowflakey cuntfucker. Even if there was an argument, budging in to spam it is never going to help anything, it just makes the argument worse and the hate directed to you, you even spam on therapy subreddits and trauma subs for fucks sake, I made this bot out of nothing but pure hatred and annoyance of you, who gave you the right to dictate what I can say? Why does it matter to you to constantly harass and annoy others purely based on your snowflake judgements? Why do you not delete yourself? Join r/ihatecooldownbot. Im a FUCKING Bot... no info (yet) made by (removed) :) (contact this account about bot)

[–]the-mega-sad 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]gabalabe24 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]thesnowstorm171 point 5 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]mariious 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]FixThatDrill_M8 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Body_Infamous 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title	An honest question
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	719
Comments	93
Date	November 6, 2020 7:18 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/AntiFeminists
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/jp0pte/an_honest_question/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/AntiFeminists/an-honest-question.1193688 https://theredarchive.com/post/1193688

Comments

Bible