Has anybody here had the displeasure of watching any of her garbage? It's pseudo-intellectual jargon which always devolves into "Women most affected" when presenting any male issues.

On the "Are straight men OK?" video she outright says that the girlfriends and wives who had to do damage control for their partners were the first victims of the manosphere, when it's obviously young men and boys who had their world view destroyed, in many cases forever. In the same video she cluelessly says the the metoo movement hasn't changed the way we interact with people as men, a movement that at some point was co-opted by misandrists to generalise us as potential predators when it's a minority who commits these heinous crimes, and is often in a place of power. Average Joe has that title of "potential predator" looming over their head, but because she doesn't, obviously "it just doesn't make sense, it's weird".

It's so obvious that she has never actually tried to put herself in our shoes and sees us as a privileged oppressor class, but tries so hard to act like a proper well read socialist. Marx would roll his eyes if he watched a good chunk of her videos. She's not a socialist, she's a pseudo-intellectual hack. Whenever a socioeconomic issue involves being a woman, she will read up on so much 4th wave echo chamber garbo that supports her notion in one way or another. The moment it involves being a man, she will always argue that "it's capitalism's fault and this isn't a gendered issue", even though there is literal research that backs up that it is INDEED a gendered issue, a male issue.

Completely irrelevant, but I find the way she talks absolutely ear grating and somewhat disgusting. It's like she has a ton of phlegm stuck in her throat in the way she pronounces some things.