It struck me that the historical narrative related to rape is always focused on the males violating females - but looking at biology, it seems like whatever forces influenced the design of the male body has favoured a neurological response which makes it possible to rape a male and be fertilised, even when the male is raped.

Logically, it seems like males are possible to rape for evolutionary reasons, as domination and aggression is common among mammals (as the male glans-ridge has recently been hypothesised to have evolved to extricate "competing" seminal emissions already inside). Putting it under the control of the being would be far more prudent - but the body isn't there for the person inhabiting it, or we would be able to control everything from when we sleep to how we react to e.g. attacks, fear, coldness etc.

It's quite obviously a common recurrence even in our times, but I have yet to see any paleoanthropological research focus on female violations.

Does anyone know if any such research has been made, seriously entertained, or even simply suggested?