TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sewblon Archive

View 41 posts and 603 comments by Sewblon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
279

Activism/SupportSewblon/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:21 PM
247

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights17/06/23 10:08 PM
150

social issuesSewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/22 06:26 PM
132

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights22/01/21 05:19 AM
130

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:34 AM
122

misandrySewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/21 08:22 AM
100

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:08 PM
93

masculinitySewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 06:54 PM
86

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:49 AM
84

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:52 AM
71

legal rightsSewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 04:01 AM
58

GeneralSewblon/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:19 AM
56

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights17/07/19 07:46 AM
56

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:44 PM
53

DiscriminationSewblon/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:18 AM
48

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:00 AM
45

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:12 PM
44

Sewblon/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:00 AM
36

educationSewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/21 05:20 AM
34

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 05:17 PM
34

FeminismSewblon/r/MensRights23/02/25 12:31 AM
29

GeneralSewblon/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:29 PM
27

masculinitySewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/21 02:51 AM
27

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:55 PM
25

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/19 12:13 PM
23

legal rightsSewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 02:16 AM
13

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 05:47 AM
13

FeminismSewblon/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:46 AM
12

Legal RightsSewblon/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:57 AM
11

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/20 02:23 AM
11

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 06:12 PM
10

FeminismSewblon/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:34 AM
10

Legal RightsSewblon/r/MensRights08/02/19 11:15 PM
6

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:15 PM
5

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights27/01/19 04:23 AM
4

Social IssuesSewblon/r/MensRights20/02/19 03:58 PM
4

FeminismSewblon/r/MensRights11/09/18 08:52 PM
4

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/20 08:41 PM
3

GeneralSewblon/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:30 PM
2

Sewblon/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 03:07 AM
1

Edu./Occu.Sewblon/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

>because as far as I had been told, women were braver, more curious, and more intelligent. I want to focus on this claim in particular. Women are more curious according to the Greater Good Curiosity Quiz. But, that might be due to women being more likely to answer "yes" to questions on surveys. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_curious_are_people_from_different_backgrounds More importantly, they don't tell you their sampling methodology. It looks like those results are based on a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 04:55 AM
-2

>more broader ways to express yourself and ways you can be as a man. Can you give me an example of that? But anyway, "conservative" just means "Republican." "Progressive." just means "Democrat." People think that these words have trans historical meanings. But they don't. It used to be that "conservatives" opposed cutting the income tax. It used to be that "progressives" supported eugenics. Women are more democratic than men. But men and women under 30 are both more Democratic than people over 3…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 08:08 PM
10

It is weird that a man cannot complain about being judged based on his appearance without being accused of reinforcing sexism as a social norm and perpetuating rape culture. Its not like male beauty standards are neutral or anti-sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/26 05:45 AM
25

The problem with that first example is that its predicated on the assumption that testosterone leads to aggression. changes in endogenous testosterone correlate with changes in aggression. But if you look at experimental administration of exogenous testosterone, then there is no relationship between testosterone and aggression. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Is-testosterone-linked-to-human-aggression-A-of-the-Geniole-Geniole/b57b9b63bdff2c3cd09a5d7379bbd5c5f04f2494 Also, there is no acade…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/25 10:49 PM
1

Do these A.I. companies track the gender identity of their users? If not, then how do we know that men are using A.I. as therapists more than women and non-binary people are? If we don't know that, then phrasing it as "men are opening up to A.I. instead of humans." is disingenuous. It should be "Humans are opening up to A.I. instead of a therapist."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 10:34 PM
-22

But if its based on the assumption that masculinity is superior to femininity, then isn't that misogyny?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 06:46 AM
7

>🔥 Trans women do not need surgery to be valid. The medical industry has weaponized gender transition, forcing trans women to undergo medical procedures to be socially accepted rather than allowing fluid identity formation. As a trans woman, the medical industry never forced me to undergo medical procedures to be accepted as a woman. In fact, they hindered me from getting hormone replacement therapy. I don't know what you mean by "fluid identity formation." I know that gender fluid people exist.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 01:59 AM
1

>Nothing wrong in and of itself there, but what about murdered men and boys? Of all backgrounds, indigenious or otherwise? There is a holiday for murdered indigenous males. Its called Blue Jean Jacket Day. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7227718
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 07:00 AM
4

Its true that killing women makes population replacement harder than killing men all other things remaining equal. But, if the society whose population being replaced is inherently oppressive to women, then what stake do women have in that society surviving? The internal logic doesn't hold up. But also, when it comes to the draft and military stuff. I am coming into this with a bias. I am disabled. I have never served and likely never will. But also, Putin isn't afraid of anything. He is going t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 06:12 AM
3

"Foid" is new to me. I thought that the female equivalent of "moid" was "femoid."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 02:18 AM
3

I did see a post from r/self where it was really just about the poster not liking men in their 20s for sterotypical reasons like arguing over protein powder but refusing to see a doctor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 12:27 AM
13

Is there any scientific evidence that insecurity leads to rape? Is that a view that any one who has studied the psychology of rape purports to have?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 02:48 AM
1

I think that for this to be meaningful you need to communicate what you actually believe about men and masculinity. What qualities do you think that men should have? Are any of those qualities that women cannot or should not have? Where do you think that the resentment towards women comes from? What do you think it means to be masculine? What do you think it means to be feminine?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 01:29 AM
2

How does Real ID make mail in ballots verifiable?
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:05 PM
-13

Which expectations are you talking about?
/r/MensRights16/03/25 02:39 AM
2

I fixed it. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 09:06 AM
13

The idea that most men who are sexually assaulted are sexually assaulted by other men is not true. Most men who are sexually assaulted report female perpetrators. Also, most of the male inmates who have sex with female correctional officers are minors. So the idea that they are not victims is very dubious. https://malesurvivor.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/StempleFloresMeyer2016femaleperpetators.pdfAlso, "considered the other way around" by whom? The officers? the inmates? both? someone complete…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:13 AM
99

Women who are married do live longer than women who were never married, according to the first study that I found. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/table/tbl2/
/r/MensRights12/03/25 08:40 PM
-2

what biology are you talking about? Has this strategy worked for you?
/r/MensRights12/03/25 08:36 PM
-1

>I don't even know if I can get a girlfriend because am too afraid of her dumping me because of my trauma. There is something for that exact problem. Its called therapy. But, therapy does not work for guys as well as it does for girls. So expect to go through 3 or more therapists before you find one who works for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf8bt6fGQyA&t=
/r/MensRights09/03/25 10:39 PM
2

I would recommend seeking therapy to discuss these feelings. It sounds like you have some unprocessed feelings about this. But also, your ex was absolutely in the wrong.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 09:36 PM
3

I put "left wing" just because I voted for Kamala Harris in 2024. In American English, "left wing" just means "whatever the democrats are doing." similarly, right-wing just means "whatever the Republicans are doing." The entire left-right division in politics is socially constructed and causes more problems than it solves. You can read more about it in "The Myth of Left and Right." If you want one of my views on something related to men: Then I think that we should standardize prison sentence le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/25 03:55 AM
1

I know that NCFM stand for National Coalition for Men. But what do the other acronyms stand for?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:39 PM
0

>It's not like a person would have to look that far or hard to find research. Whether on this sub or a google search. But can you give me an example of that research that is done by people who hold explicitly MRA beliefs or explicitly identify as MRA?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:07 AM
1

>Well the Democrats also used to be the Right Wing party and Republicans were the Left Wing party. It was between the 1920's to the 1960's when the 2 parties slowly swapped platforms. That is not what Lewis and Lewis said in the "The Myth of Left and Right" They say that there wasn't really a left-wing party or a right-wing party in America until FDR's new deal. Then, being left-wing meant being in favor of a large, active government, both in foreign policy and domestic policy. So pro welfare st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/25 12:52 AM
10

Making it illegal to criticize the left is problematic because "The left" in America, is just whatever the current democratic party is doing. For example, it used to be that being on the "the left" meant being pro-war. But that changed once the Democrats turned against war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/25 12:47 AM
4

tbh, I think that capitalism and how it can be replaced or reformed and the problems of men as a gender are separate problems that require separate solutions. Remember, modern socialist states still have the male life expectancy gap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 04:54 AM
2

This sub-reddit needs a new name.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 10:19 PM
6

>At the same time I don't think that I make for a good ambassador anymore, as over time and juggling with my personal difficulties such as mental health, my own knowledge of men's issues has started fading away. it has been completely muddied by masking, people-pleasing and diplomacy I think that this is the problem. You should take some time to yourself and maybe seek therapy to nail down what you actually believe and what is actually important to you. But also, left-politics and right-politics…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:43 PM
1

I have yet to be moderated on Healthy Gamer. But I only posted there twice and commented once or twice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 11:16 PM
26

I am a trans woman. But I am only out online. So, I am speaking as someone who deals with the expectations placed on men in the real world every day. But, I suspect its that most people think of rape as something that men do to women, because under the law, at least in the state of New York, you need a penis to rape. https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/rsa/rape-and-sexual-assault/what-is-rape-and-sexual-assault/ But if you look at all sexual assault, including being made to p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 11:09 PM
2

Now that you mention it, yeah. He trippen. Edit: No he worse than trippen. Hes fallen and cannot get up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 11:02 PM
10

You are right. It disables the comment when you try to say "misandry" The reasoning is that it is used to de-rail productive discussions. But that has not been my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 03:49 AM
6

He honestly looks less like he is mentally ill and more like a fraud.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 10:52 PM
1

Where does it say you can't type "misandry" in the rules?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 10:52 PM
1

>so I think men should strive to be their true selves whether or not it aligns with traditional masculinity. What is the purpose of being your true self and how do you know when you have achieved it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 10:13 PM
7

>What's the difference between a guy taking pictures of a female Wrestler feet vs a guy on social media talking about how sexy a female Wrestler is by saying GYAT. The difference is consent. If you take pictures of someone's feet without their consent, then that person just has to live with people seeing their feet whether they wanted it or not. But if someone posts their picture on social media and someone else finds that picture hot, then the person who posted the picture doesn't get to compla…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 03:25 AM
4

>I think that it gave me some really unhelpful ideas about sexual interactions and what women want. Like what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:04 PM
30

I never thought about it before. But with Judy Hop's speech about the predators biology driving them to violence and people saying that testosterone causes aggression I can see that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 03:58 AM
0

There is no compelling argument for a male loneliness epidemic. If you only look at studies that involved more than 100 males and 100 females, then the male loneliness surplus disappears. https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/135977571/EJP_Gender_Postprint_AAM.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 04:12 AM
8

I think that you see this disconnect, because "conservative" and "progressive" are social constructs. They only really exist in the discourses that we have about them. For instance, free trade used to be a conservative position. But now its not. Standardized tests used to be considered progressive. But now they are not. The only thing that every thing labeled "Conservative" has in common is that it has been labeled "Conservative." The only thing that everything labeled "Progressive" has in commo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 01:09 AM
0

There is no compelling evidence for a male loneliness epidemic. https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/135977571/EJP_Gender_Postprint_AAM.pdf The problem isn't gender based organizing. The problem is that the issue is likely a mirage. But there are legal issues that men face, like getting longer prison sentences for the same crime. https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/2023-demographic-differences-federal-sentencing Or being the only ones who have to register for the draft.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 11:35 PM
8

I don't know if I am a Feminist or not. But, the issues that I think really need addressing are the life expectancy gap: Women outlive men in every country and every year for which reliable records exist. And the sentencing gap: Men get longer prison sentences than women for the same crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 03:17 AM
6

>Real people don't care about this shit. This person says to a real person who cares about this shit. This is blatant gas-lighting. The people who respond to feelings of guilt with "touch grass" or "Read Proust" are, I think not helping. Feelings, including guilt, come from our thoughts. Before you can change them, you have to figure out which conclusion is causing those feelings, and assess if that conclusion is correct. If it is correct, then you just have to learn to live with that feeling. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 03:02 AM
7

What gets me is that the man's family decided that he should marry another woman. So, I see no evidence that this man lied to this woman or did anything that would be considered rape by fraud or coercion. These Redditors are leaping to conclusions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 02:13 AM
7

What sticks out at me is that the mixed methods study doesn't include instances where the victim was forced to penetrate the perpetrator. If you include that, then men and women are about equally likely to be the victims of sexual assault and most men report female perpetrators. https://malesurvivor.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/StempleFloresMeyer2016femaleperpetators.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 01:40 AM
-13

There is no compelling evidence for a male loneliness epidemic. The male loneliness surplus disappears when you only look at studies that sampled more than 100 men and more than 100 women. https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/135977571/EJP_Gender_Postprint_AAM.pdf Women also have worse mental health than men. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/explore-mental-health/statistics/men-women-statistics There are ways in which men are legitimately worse off than women, like life expectancy.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/24 03:14 AM
9

If we are talking about vulnerability to early death, then men are more vulnerable than women, not less. Men are the ones who are more likely to die of all leading causes of death, except for dementia, once you adjust for age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 02:58 AM
1

>the mainstream liberal spaces do talk about exhibiting masculinity without the toxicity "all the time." I have never seen that. Edit: I have seen people claim to talk about healthy masculinity. But, its never something that can serve to differentiate men from women. That is a necessary condition for masculinity, at least in my mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/24 03:49 AM
4

I am not sure I understand the difference between men as a group and patriarchy in this context. Every societal structure has to be created anew with each generation, at the cost of great suffering. So if this societal structure called Patriarchy is not the product of men acting according to their interests, or at least what they think that their interests are, then what exactly is it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 12:33 AM
5

What issue X is only brought up when people are talking about Y? Its the internet, every issue has someone who brings it up without someone else bringing up something else. What exactly do they think "Gotcha points" are? I have brought up circumcision in real life, with my parents. I have seen people bring it up without any other gender issue prompting it on Youtube, like Concordance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2gloq-prkA Edit: The argument is that "white and other majority group men don't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/24 01:51 AM
20

I agree that if any demographic is more likely to do something than other demographics, that there is a reason for it. But women doing non-reciprocal violence against intimate partners due to self-defense is not plausible to me, because of men and women's motives for IPV are in general the same. (Dynamics of Family and Intimate Partner Violence 1st ed.Dynamics of Family and Intimate Partner Violence 1st ed. by Irene Frieze et al) pages 314-315. Also, this idea that men are more violent than wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 12:11 AM
29

The one Men's issue that people have explicitly told me that they are surprised to hear without arguing against it, is that men who don't register for the draft can't get a drivers license in most states in America. America is a car dependent nation. So that matters. There is also how Doctors spend less time with male patients than female patients. I never see Men's Rights Activists bring this up. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 10:19 PM
11

When it comes to sexual assault, most male victims report female perpetrators. https://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf So "by other men" doesn't apply to one very important issue. Even when it does, like with homicide, progressive people never use that rhetoric with other groups for which it applies, like black men. When people do that, they consider it racist. So its not consistent even when it does apply. But anyway, who actually uses …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 08:04 PM
16

Women are not taken as seriously by healthcare professionals. What are you talking about? doctors spend more time with women than men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 08:01 PM
0

Where are you getting this?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:19 PM
4

In the traditional sense of the words, feminism has become so Yang, that it's best to respond with Yin energy, even though it's all backwards. The poles have shifted in the past 10 years & now it is the Right wing that represents the emotions of the masses. This is why a bunch of lunatics are so popular these days, they got spirit! Say what you like about Trump, he is exceptionally intuitive. That is what happened in Italy with Meloni. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZSB31F-odA&t=561s But Trump…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 03:02 AM
3

ok. Why do you think that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 12:57 AM
4

I don't know much about the state of men in Canada. But I still think that you should focus on specific, actionable issues. It makes you harder to write off as a patriarchal reactionary if you focus on specific, provable things, like men getting longer prison sentences than women for the same crime, or men dying sooner than women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 06:56 PM
2

I think the most constructive thing to do is ask the professor what in behaviors in the movie is specifically insecure or entitled.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:09 AM
2

I think that legally, drunk people cannot consent to have sex. But that is drunk people, not just men. Drunk men can't consent to have sex with women anymore than drunk women can consent to have sex with men. Who gets pregnant has nothing to do with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/23 01:07 AM
1

why is the tag humour?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 06:09 AM
13

"The first commonly understood reason we overlook the victimization of men by women is that men disproportionately victimize women, by a longshot." That is not true if you go by victimization reports from the past year of which people were asked whether their spouse abused them or not. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/pa/2012/00000003/00000002 I bring up past year reports and not life time reports because past year reports are more reliable than life time reports, because its easi…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:28 AM
1

Ok. No reason to let people use false claims of parenthood to cheat someone else out of their property or access to their children.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:43 AM
2

I think that you should tell HR now, so that no one else will have to make this decision later with this same customer.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:27 AM
8

https://www.alimed.com/circumstraint.html Used by more than 11,000 hospitals as the cost effective, safe, easy, durable, infant immobilization standard for modern nurseries I was hoping that this wasn't actually used by anyone. That is what I get for hoping.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:18 PM
1

Don't worry. I tried again and I succeeded this time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/23 01:26 AM
20

I don't have any proof that they all do it, or even that most of them do it. So I hedged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/23 01:22 AM
3

I tried setting up a kb.social account. I got a 429 error due to too many requests. So that one is not going to work for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 06:34 AM
1

Does anyone have a link to the actual instagram video? I can't find it in the article or on his instagram account.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 04:42 AM
-10

Men have been killing themselves in droves for decades and all we heard was "haha fragile male tears" and "man up". Who was saying that in regards to male suicide?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:57 AM
-7

I did.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 06:55 PM
-11

He said there had been a ‘chance meeting’ between Frankie and the accuser weeks before the rave – and they were ‘seen to shake hands’. He believed ‘any bad feeling had subsided’ between the pair. I don't think that the rape accusation is what made him decide to kill himself.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 03:37 PM
3

It was specifically white men, and "useless" specifically in regards to diversity quotas. Not useless in a professional context.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 05:54 AM
-1

Who exactly do you think would stigmatize you for discussing this stuff? Has that ever happened in your experience? What patriarchal expectations do you feel the need to fulfill?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/23 11:41 PM
3

I see nothing wrong with this personally, most men just have a different way of being and studies have shown that men tend to be either more left brained or right brained than women, but I probably should avoid bringing this up in order to avoid sounding like a gender fundamentalist Right now, the evidence indicates that the idea that some people are more right brained and others are more left brained is a myth. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/right-brainleft-brain-right-2017082512222 But an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/23 02:46 AM
1

Note that when women are cheating more, no report including the original one will say it. Yes they will. It also said that the vast majority of cheating behavior is done by guests, not brides to be or grooms to be. But that is probably just because the guests are most of the people at the party. But still, the article's author isn't hiding that brides to be cheat at bachelorette parties more than grooms to be do in their survey. Here is the quote to prove it: There are no two ways about it, the …
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:36 AM
7

'To avoid permit and multi-agency coordination, it had to meet these City standards: be less than 24" wide, maintain 4ft clearance, be entirely on the pole, be durable, and be removable,' the organization said. That is why this thing is so stupid. The problem isn't really the department of transit. Its the city standards. Were it not for those standards, the department of transit could just build regular bus shelters.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:08 AM
1

'At the moment, you have 15 anonymous jurors but now judges will be under a huge amount of pressure to convict because there is a political agenda to push up the conviction rate and those who don't do so will find themselves under a lot of scrutiny.' That is true. But, it could go either way. What if the defendant is rich and bribes the judge to acquit? What if they pay someone to threaten the judge into acquitting? What if the defendant is famous and their fans surround the court house and dema…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:13 AM
3

tbh, I have read that when people talk about being authentic with respect to themselves, they are really talking about how they want to be perceived, because people feel the most authentic when they are perceived by others the way that they want to be perceived. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/authenticity-under-fire/ But that is the opposite of how I always understood that word: I understood it to mean doing things that you know that other people won't necessarily like. But…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 03:44 AM
3

So what do people mean by authentic?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 11:21 PM
2

As someone who's basically a closeted femboy, I have to disagree with this sentiment. Hell, ask trans people if they always felt that way. I am a closeted trans woman. I don't know who my fully female self would be, because she isn't here, because I haven't gone on HRT or gotten any feminizing surgeries. But I still want to know what she is like. And she did articulate a way: it's the one you're criticizing. It's dumb and nonsensical, but she gave an answer. You mean authenticity? Like I said, t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 10:21 PM
2

“Reeves' solution is to "red shirt" boys — have them enrolled in school a year later to address developmental delays. When I first heard this solution, I balked, but Reeves makes a valid point. We adjusted STEM programs to attract more women but never changed the education system to address the boys who lag in emotional intelligence. (Statistically, they catch up to girls.)” Boys don’t catch up to girls. The biggest sex difference in emotional intelligence is among young adults, not children. (S…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 09:20 PM
6

The first thing that comes to mind is the episode of the Simpsons where Lisa thinks that she is going to become dumb because of the Simpson gene. But it turns out that the Simpson gene is on the Y chromosome. So only men are affected. So genetic determinism is true. Its just that men are the ones who are genetically stupid. At least in that one episode. In another episode it turns out that Homer is dumb because he has a crayon in his brain. So when the crayon is removed, he becomes intelligent. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 08:59 PM
2

In Japan, about 19% of journalists are women. Japan has the lowest percentage of female journalists. So, women journalists are under- represented among journalists who are killed. In other words, women journalists are not more likely to be killed than male journalists. They are less likely to be killed than male journalists. So whoever is targeting female journalists, isn't doing a good job of it. The people we would save the most lives by stopping, are the ones who kill male journalists.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 08:48 AM
-3

If men are not using the service as much, then cutting the service does affect women more. Even if men would benefit from using the service at the same rates that women do, cutting the service doesn't affect men if men are not going to use it either way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/23 07:56 AM
2

However, many of the reasons why women earn less than men are structural. Different occupations have different salaries, and there are more women in sectors with lower pay, such as health care. If this is hard to change, why should governments not use tax policy to compensate women for their lower pay, at least until the gender pay gap is closed? Because some sectors being higher paying than others isn't ipso facto bad. Some jobs require more training, more hours, or are just less intrinsically …
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:22 PM
15

it was important to remember that a woman was killed by a man every three days in the UK. In England and Whales, 2/3 of all homicide victims were male. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/homicideinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2021 In Scotland, 97% of homicide victims are male. https://www.gov.scot/publications/homicide-scotland-2017-18/pages/2/ In Northern Ireland, men are 72% of homicide victims. https://www.psni.police.uk/globalassets/inside-the-psni…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:45 AM
0

Interesting, can you give me some examples of those things?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 10:59 PM
0

I suspect that they would tell you that women all ready get emotional validation from other women. So saying that women should get emotional validation from other women is wrong because it makes it sound like it doesn't happen, when generally speaking it does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 09:49 PM
0

Maybe. The new rule seems to be that men are supposed to get that sort of validation from other men, not from women. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/men-no-friends-women-bear-171500302.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 09:33 PM
1

My mom trauma dumps on me whenever we talk politics. So, it sounds to me like those feminists were just being emotionally abusive. I hope that you find someone better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 09:09 PM
-6

Trauma dumping is a real thing. But, it involves refusing to listen to the other person and not being open to finding a solution. https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-is-trauma-dumping/ You may have been trauma dumping. They may have just been using jargon to try and shut you up. I don't know. But therapy might help. If you can afford it that is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 06:46 PM
11

If you include cases where the victims was made to penetrate the perpetrator and the institutionalized population, then women commit about as much sexual assault as men. Its due mostly to the high rate of sexual victimization in juvenile hall of male inmates by female staff. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308844135_Sexual_Victimization_Perpetrated_by_Women_Federal_Data_Reveal_Surprising_Prevalence https://www.academia.edu/8929198/The_Sexual_Victimization_of_Men_in_America_New_DataChall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 10:34 AM
1

Gender actually is a spectrum. That is how non-binary people exist. It is well documented that people generally like women better than men. There is even a name for it. Its called the Women are Wonderful effect. Discrimination against me and boys actually does exist. Boys get harsher punishments for the same offenses in school. Men get longer prison sentences for the same crime. This isn't necessarily discrimination. But, men generally suffer from more violent crime than women. So, I don't see h…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:11 AM
2

>attempts to normalise extreme misogyny and conspiracy theory The problem here is the concept of a "conspiracy theory." That term mainly functions to deligitimize people with ideas that threaten the powerful. So using it unironically doesn't challenge existing hierarchies. It reinforces them. ​ I can't say that I like Andrew Tate. His basic world view seems to be "might makes right." But, I also can't say that I am hopeful for these sorts of campaigns meant to monitor and regulate teenager's soc…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:55 AM
1

Responding to the article via Twitter are a number of men who insist that women are “too picky” and have “double standards”. They claim that they actually have great personalities, and that women just don’t want to date them because they aren’t good looking. “Women are just too complicated,” these same men will proclaim, ignoring the dozens of women telling them exactly how they want to be treated; with respect, dignity, tenderness. tbh, this is just ignoring the elephant in the room. Men and wo…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 09:24 AM
32

The author of this article is a therapist. Therapy was always going to be the solution that he proposed, because that is how he makes money. When you really want to hammer stuff, everything looks like a nail.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 08:45 AM
1

Men can be discriminated against. Doctors give male patients less time than female patients. Judges give male offenders longer sentences than female offenders who commit the same crime. That is my understanding of oppression.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:10 AM
3

I understand dismissing allegations centered on issues that have all ready been determined to be without merit. But combining that, with the removal of the appeals process, basically means that the agency has 1 chance to get it right, and anything that it gets wrong, it gets wrong once and for all. That doesn't help victims of sexual harassment, nor does it help anyone who has been accused of sexual harassment. The department is just making its job easier at the expense of the people it is suppo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 04:20 PM
3

In the article that you cited, Mary Ford argued, I believe correctly, that the consent model of pregnancy fails for the following reasons: 1. Eileen McDonagh fails to distinguish between factual causes and legal causes. So even if the fetus is the factual cause of the woman's pregnancy, she still hasn't shown that it is or should be considered the legal cause of pregnancy, which is necessary for the consent model to work. 2. Even if the fetus is solely responsible for making the woman pregnant, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/22 01:40 PM
1

The right to get a drivers license without signing up for the selective service. Even if the U.S. never has a draft again, its still extra work to legally drive a car in most states, in a country that is mostly car-dependent.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:32 PM
8

Where is this happening? Who took those photographs?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 09:52 PM
1

Adult interdependent partners are defined as people who live together for at least three years, or who live and have a child together, if they have cohabited for less than three years. Its not enough to date for 3 years. You need to live together for 3 years or have a kid. Giving someone half your stuff for 3 years of dating would just be silly.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:10 AM
1

Your link to the urology times isn't working for some reason.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:34 AM
5

You shouldn't go by a singular study unless you are an expert. For biomedical information like this, you need a meta-analyses or a systematic review or guidelines from a national or international organization or a recent text book.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:34 AM
16

This paper from 2003 says that doctors spend less time with men per-visit and give them less advice. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:21 PM
1

The stated purpose of this is to help women and non-binary people open up more earning opportunities. Is there any reason to think that this will actually help with that? Where are these women and non-binary people who would be making money as uber drivers if they did not have to service male passengers? In fact, this is likely to make the pay gap worse by reducing the potential clients of female uber drivers. Also, is this legal? Do all the countries where Uber operates allow you to discriminat…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:36 PM
4

As someone who's not trans but has felt the strong desire to not have a male body If you are assigned male at birth, then that makes you trans. That being said, I do notice the sentiment that you are talking about. I have heard people say that the average man is ugly and read in the Atlantic that women are better looking than men. I just don't know if this is recent or if things have been this way since before I was born. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/07/the-myth-of-buying-beau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 04:36 PM
1

Something similar happened to me years ago. I was eating at a Chinese restaurant, one of the owners, an older lady, started flirting with me and hugging my arm. I was really uncomfortable because my parents were there and I had no idea how to react to that.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 04:19 AM
1

I would be interested to know why that one poster doesn't think that taking a male BC pill and going condom-less would help with sensation. I am a virgin. So I wouldn't know. Also, if you don't trust someone to take the pill, then dating them is a bad idea. What hormones do they think that men should be given exactly?
/r/MensRights04/04/22 04:17 AM
0

Women are under-represented in law-enforcement. So this makes sense to me. The civil service in a democracy should represent the people they theoretically work for. I can also get behind allowing dyed hair and multiple ear piercings. It isn't clear that banning those increases police effectiveness. The only thing that I would take issue with is removing the bench press requirement for SWAT team members. You only deploy the SWAT team when peaceful solutions have failed. So all other things remain…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 03:39 AM
8

I don't think that its a no true Scotsman fallacy. I think its circular reasoning. Or in other words: heads I win. Tails, you lose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/22 11:12 PM
1

I don't know of any such laws in the country that I currently live in (The Bahamas). But I don't know the laws of this country that well. The country that I came from (The U.S.) I know the laws of better. In the U.S., only women have to register for the draft. The U.S. hasn't had a draft since the 70s. But men who don't register are not eligible for a drivers license in most states. In the U.S., a car is the only way to get around in most cities. So it matters.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:13 AM
1

The SATs are not pass-fail. They are a numerical score based test. That being said, I know who you are talking about completely. My parents went to Duke University. They both think that the COVID-19 vaccines are killing people. My dad can do differential equations no problem. He thinks that everything in the news and on wikipedia is actually a C.I.A. psy-op. My mom has a Master's Degree. She thinks that the CCP made me trans. But, neither of them were homeschooled. So, that undercuts the point a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 08:25 AM
1

I was home schooled. I was taught creationism and climate change denial. But, I did do better on the SATs than most students. So I must have acquired some kind of education. So those things are not mutually exclusive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 09:13 PM
1

I didn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 09:18 AM
2

Those kids who have access to the internet? Sorry but I think you're back-pedalling. ok, why do you think that? Look, I peeked into your history and I'm genuinely sorry about what's happened to you but it doesn't justify the idea that a teacher's answer to questions about a Grade 3's sexuality or gender identity should be anything but "You should talk to your parents about that." Who said that it did? If they can't talk to their parents, there's google. Is google really any better than teachers?…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 09:17 AM
3

Yes, it is. Parents have more rights to their children than teachers. That is true. Teachers are just people who get paid to teach kids things and look after them during the day. They don't have to deal with the kids when they are not on the clock. Are you a teacher? Because you seem really ignorant to the idea that other people don't have more rights to a child than their parents. I am not a teacher. I am a securities analyst. My main concern isn't the right of the teachers. Its the right of th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 07:49 AM
2

Parents have a right to weird ideas. But so do the people who parents pay to watch their kids and teach them things during the day. More importantly, kids should have a right to inquire into the weird ideas of everyone in their life, not just the people who pay for their food. foster homes are not good! Not good in what way? Its not like people who grew up in adoptive households turned out worse than the people who grew up in natural households. In fact, the exact opposite is the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 07:39 AM
4

Its true that it isn't up to the state or to schools or teachers to define children's sexuality or gender identity. But it isn't up to the parents to define those things either. Putting all of it on the parents isn't any better than putting it all on the teachers. The kids should be able to get information about this stuff from parents and teachers. It doesn't have to be one or the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 01:51 AM
3

I don't know. I was homeschooled. But if it is, then it isn't necessarily a good thing. Some parents have weird ideas, like my dad thinking that cross-dressing or being trans makes me demon possessed, for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 01:48 AM
7

I disagree. What if some kids with gay or trans parents or older siblings have questions about what they see with their own eyes in their own home? What if the kids want to know if they are gay or trans? Do you just tell the teachers to say "I could tell you. But then they would fire me." How does that help anything?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 10:50 AM
9

The self-declared republics are not recognized by any government, including Russia. The Ukrainian government refuses to talk directly with either separatist republic. https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/18/europe/ukraine-russia-news-friday-rebel-evacuations-intl/index.html These people do not have the authority to order anything. Detaining the 18 to 55 men of these areas is abduction. I am no expert on the law or politics of Ukraine. But if there is justice, the separatist leadership will be tried for t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 08:46 PM
-12

But that doesn't work for most guys. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/myth-busting-the-true-picture-of-gendered-violence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 01:01 AM
-11

Meanwhile, men are a vast majority of the homeless and male homeless people are more likely to be rough-sleepers, are homeless on average for longer, are more likely to suffer violent crime while homeless, and more likely to suffer ill health as a result of homelessness, and more likely to die while homeless. Where are you getting this? I ask, because what I have read says that women who are homeless are the ones who have a higher risk of premature mortality and are more likely to suffer violent…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 08:46 PM
0

The rich are working slightly more hours, but the real story is the dramatic increase in the hours by the poor and middle-class that are not corresponding with higher wages. And these hours are not of the same quality; they are more satisfying and less stressful. Actually, yes it is true. Its just that other stuff tends to overshadow it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/22 06:52 PM
1

Many Marxists are quick to point out that the working class works harder, and therefore has a better work ethic, than the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class. Because that is basically what class stratification is about. Most of society labors to produce a surplus, which is then consumed idly by the capitalist class. But that isn't true. Not anymore. Now, its the rich who work more, because work is more intellectually stimulating and economically profitable than it used to be. https://www.businessi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 06:41 AM
1

Is that on the full image or the one on Reddit? I can't find it in either place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 11:47 PM
1

That article is exactly the same as what I cited.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 09:02 PM
1

Is that for all of Britain or just England and Whales? What is the document name?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 08:00 PM
3

"We are more at risk physically than men in that situation. It's just a fact, I'm afraid." The statistics that I can find don't bear that out. In England and Whales, its men who are more likely to be victims of all forms of violent crime except for domestic violence, not women, and its mostly men who are victims of violent crime resulting in injury or death, despite there being slightly more women than men in Great Britain. https://www.indexmundi.com/united_kingdom/sex_ratio.html https://www.ons…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 07:31 PM
10

I can't see the CEO's response. How do you go to the second image? But anyway, this is a really good example of the gender paradox of crime, and how it distorts our discourse. Women are more fearful of crime. But less likely to actually have it happen to them than men are. https://news.illinois.edu/view/6367/205718 So you end up with the people who are safer outside demanding special treatment, on the grounds that they feel more anxious or more afraid. I am not saying that there is a right or wr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 07:18 PM
1

Your confusing philosophy fascinates me. Please elaborate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 06:14 AM
1

Wrong, Gold/Dollar/Diamond only has "value" because we have decided it does. I am pretty sure that people decided that Gold has value because its easy to work and rare. If we had no metal working, then I don't think that we would have made that same decision. Patriarchal "Worldview" DOES NOT exist, Patriarchy only exists in the context of a Family. Feminists have took something that is used to define a Family Structure have extrapolated and superimposed that into an entire Civilization. What Fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 12:57 PM
-4

Honestly, I can't sign off on the idea that males have value simply for being. Nothing has value simply for being what it is. All value is context dependent. Water only has value in the context of life forms based on water. Gold only has value in the context of metal working. Males are the same way. But so is everyone else. More importantly, Christianity disproves Bell Hook's thesis about patriarchal culture only valuing males for what they do. You will be hard pressed to find a Christian who de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 10:08 AM
2

That is happening to me as well. But I did find a therapist who I can talk to this stuff about without fear of judgement. Just try to find one. But anyway, if you don't think that women have it easier than men, then what disagreements do you have with the feminist establishment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 08:34 AM
5

"With respect to gender, Table 3 demonstrates that women are overrepresented in the media population when compared to the women in the FBI Active Missing Person File (z = -3.20, p < .001). " and more, but the study was super long https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol106/iss2/4/ You are not supposed to go by a singular study unless you are an expert in that subject. Most research fails replication. But that definition of rape, that is unambiguous. That implies that not only can o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/21 10:42 PM
5

Where did you see that missing women get more attention than missing men and that women cannot be charged with Rape in the U.K.?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/21 05:34 PM
5

Objection your honor! Relevance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 09:20 PM
24

You said what I was trying to say about strategic essentialism perfectly. Its socially acceptable to imply that men have certain harmful tendencies and potentials that need to be kept in check in spaces where it is not acceptable to make the same argument about women, those spaces being left-wing progressive spaces mostly in my experience. But in the 90s this was more happening with conservatives arguing that absentee fathers caused toxic masculinity. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X20943254 This piece giv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 09:19 PM
24

You talking about the person from the guardian or me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 07:27 PM
13

Gov. Kay Ivey isn't writing the laws. She is signing them. But in the American system, that still matters. In general, this picture is not complete. I pointed this out myself and someone said But its men trying to outlaw it on the political level. Politicians don't actually care about how the voters feel. I am paraphrasing there. But the important part is, you need to look at who is voting for anti-abortion laws in state legislatures and who is lobbying for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 03:25 PM
1

who are you talking about? me or them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/21 08:49 PM
5

I don't know if this is true in Australia. But I do know that in the U.S., the only reason that most rape is male on female is that we exclude the institutionalized population and cases where the victim is made to penetrate the perpetrator. If you include the institutionalized population and people who were made to penetrate someone else against their will, then in the annual data, which is more reliable than the life time data because it doesn't rely on memories of the distant past (Women's Vio…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 04:23 AM
7

I think that you should tell them "That is both mean to the men and to the next person who encounters them. So who benefits from this course of action? You should be leaving everyone and everything in the same condition or better than you find it. This isn't rocket science."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 07:04 PM
3

While the woman is pregnant, only she can make the decision to abort the pregnancy, for good reason. Its her body that would need to undergo the procedure. But after the child is born, the mother and the father both have the option to abandon the child and the other partner. So I don't see the logic in this mod's position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 09:43 PM
1

But those time use surveys that people use to claim that women do more work than men take paid work into account, including commutes. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/06/its-official-women-work-nearly-an-hour-longer-than-men-every-day/ OECD_1564_TUSupdatePortal.xlsx So I don't see how that defeats the unpaid work argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 09:27 PM
2

Yeah about that, are there actual scientific studies that show that when you take commuting into account, the unpaid work gap disappears or reverses? How do we know that when you add in commuting time, men do as much or more unpaid work as women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 05:03 AM
8

Among married couples with Children, its the husbands who do the most work, not the wives. So I don't think that husbands slacking off is what is driving women doing more unpaid work. I think that what is driving it, is women being more likely to be single parents.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 05:02 AM
18

as for making women work a year longer, this is a non-runner, it says, given the years of part-time and unpaid work they do during their active lives. Women do generally do more unpaid work than men. But men put in more paid work than women, including both part time and full time work together. So the part-time work is a red-herring. Plus, this ignores that women live longer than men in Switzerland, as in most countries. So even with equal retirement ages, they get to benefit from those pensions…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/21 09:46 PM
1

Why are the police taking action against you? What are the charges? What law prohibits tarnishing the reputation of others with lies? which country are you in?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:16 AM
7

Saying that women bear the burden of men not having friends only makes sense if you think that its women being harmed by men not having friends, and not men. That isn't compatible with men getting benefits from friendship that they don't get from other relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/21 03:13 PM
31

Duckduck Go puts this link up: https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/understanding-male-friendships/ which is a podcast with a sociologist about male friendships, how adult men don't know how to make them, and how we shouldn't judge male friendships by how closely they resemble female friendships. But I got that same result from google. https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/features/a27259689/toxic-masculinity-male-friendships-emotional-labor-men-rely-on-women/ What Melanie Hamlet, or at least…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/21 12:25 AM
2

There is a way to make sense of this philosophically: You just have to believe that our culture's ideas about what a man should be really are harmful and really do lead to men being selfish and putting lives in danger, but also reject that free-will exists. "The things you do and the things that you believe are bad. But you are not to blame, because like everyone else, you are just a product of your environment floating around in a random and cruel universe."
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:08 AM
1

But back in 1971, only 14.6% of men had college degrees. In 2020, 36.7% of men had college degrees. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184272/educational-attainment-of-college-diploma-or-higher-by-gender/ We know which direction the trend is going. Its up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 04:01 AM
1

Is that the percentage of men receiving degrees or the percentage of degrees received by men? Those are not the same thing. The percentage of men receiving degrees going down would mean that men are actually less likely to go to college than they were in the past. The percentage of degrees received by men going down could just mean that men's college attainment is staying the same, but women are earning more degrees. I ask, because I am having a hard time believing that 60% of men had college de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/21 07:06 PM
0

With the rate of educated men of all races shrinking, the competition for bread winning men is going to get tighter across the board. But that isn't happening. Its not that the proportion of men with college degrees isn't going up. Its just that the proportion of women with college degrees is going up faster. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184272/educational-attainment-of-college-diploma-or-higher-by-gender/ Nevertheless, women tend to prefer better educated men, at least on Tinder. https:/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/21 05:42 PM
1

It don't know if its true that this is kind of advice is by and for black women. But if it is, then its just wishful thinking. The African American community has a shortage of men who can be providers because of things like poor education outcomes and incarceration. So for a black woman, getting what FDS calls a "HVM" is much harder than it is for white women. I can't prove this. But I strongly suspect that the women who would have the best luck actually following this strategy of "land a rich g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/21 07:10 AM
2

I haven't read the paper. But, this reminds me that in "A New Economic View of American History" by Atack and Passell, that American trade unions lobbied for limiting the working hours for women, as a way of sneaking in limits for men's working hours. The men couldn't work without the women. They did different jobs that had to be done simultaneously. So, women were not seen as economic competitors. Nor were they seen as a source of exploitable labor. Working class men saw them as a political too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/21 03:59 AM
2

The link isn't showing up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/21 05:44 PM
3

Then it should be quarantined.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/21 08:33 PM
1

. 90% of the stuff you're seeing there is being said in jest, even the really dark stuff. It's guys blowing off steam. How do you know? When all you have is text, you don't have tone of voice or facial expressions. So that makes telling a jest from a sincere declaration very hard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/21 07:15 AM
68

Two reasons come to mind: 1. People think that men harm women more than women harm men. So, they see men distrusting women as a bigger problem than women distrusting men. 2. Some people think that women are morally superior to men. So a woman behaving badly is an outlier and conflating that with all women is prejudice. But a man behaving badly is typical and an example of male typical behavior and attitudes that needs to be corrected. I do see why people think both of those things. Men kill wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/21 04:58 AM
2

Its not wrong to want your decision to not have sex be respected. Try to explain to your girlfriend that men actually can have an erection and not want sex. Just like they can be soft, and still want sex. https://goaskalice.columbia.edu/answered-questions/can-erections-happen-when-youre-not-sexually-aroused I get why your girlfriend wanted to have sex. She stopped bleeding down there. So she was exited to get to do stuff down there without making a bloody mess. But still, that doesn't mean that …
/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:32 AM
6

Everyday Feminism also mentioned this. https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/neckbeard-cartoon/ I think that you are right, and the explanation is actually quite simple. Just imagine that the stereotypical misogynist, was the exact opposite of those traits you mentioned being associated with autistic people: So the traits associated with misogyny were good grooming, good social skills, lack of interest in things that most people don't care about, and having an easy time empathizing with the exper…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 09:13 AM
7

When I used that on my own writing it returned these results: Genre: Informal Female = 1676 Male = 1850 Difference = 174; 52.46% Verdict: Weak MALEWeak emphasis could indicate European. Genre: Formal Female = 945 Male = 1203 Difference = 258; 56% Verdict: Weak MALE Weak emphasis could indicate European. I am a cross dresser. So "weak male" in the sense of leaning towards male but not that much checks out. For the writer of "'Red Pill' killed my best friend" We have this: Genre: Informal Female =…
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:34 PM
2

I can't tell if something was written by a man or a woman. But, I did pick up on something that indicates that its fiction: the complete absence of information on who the subject was before he got into TRP. Was he white? black? Jewish? Christian? non-believer? I don't know. What were his likes, what were his dislikes, why did he and the writer seem to have trouble with women in the first place? "Jake" appears to have been a blank slate who was filled with TRP ideology and it ultimately consumed …
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:26 PM
1

Facebook fundraising isn't available in the Bahamas.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 02:40 AM
15

It says here that pedophilia has a prevalence rate of 3% in females. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pedophilia To be fair, it says here that there is no current prevalence of pedophilia in women. But, it also describes a woman who meets all the criteria for pedophilia in the DSM-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325623353_Female_Perpetrated_Sexual_Abuse_and_Pedophilia ​ So female pedophilia, is not unheard of at all. So this expert, is only an expert in dis…
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:03 PM
14

“Unemployment scenario is equal for men and women. In the field of nursing, women have played a much larger and important role. What is wrong in earmarking 80 per cent nursing jobs for female nurses? It would definitely improve the quality of our healthcare system. Other hospitals should also follow the AIIMS model,” The first sentence about the unemployment scenario I am not sure what she meant. I suspect that she meant that men and women suffer unemployment at the same rate. Even if that is tr…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 10:07 PM
3

Biden’s investment, which will double the government’s spending on natural disaster preparedness in local communities, will directly impact women, who are already known to have a lower life expectancy than men in the wake of natural disasters. The article is citing a pre-print that has been withdrawn. https://nhess.copernicus.org/preprints/nhess-2017-370/ So the scientific foundations for the premise are not sound. The government is trying to solve a problem that for all we know doesn't exist. N…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:07 PM
1

If wanting to hire a woman rather than a man was not the reason that you gave for not wanting to hire my client, then what was the reason? Its called cross-examination. lying on the stand doesn't work, at least not according to Devin Stone, the lawyer from Youtube. That straight up doesn't matter I never said that it did.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:24 AM
1

What was the post?
/r/MensRights26/05/21 02:33 PM
1

I never said that she would. Confessions can be made out of court, and still be admissible. That is the whole point. Plus, we don't know that this was a woman who discriminated against him.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:55 AM
1

Try addressing the argument instead of being insulting. I was talking about the statement against interest exception to hearsay. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_804 Granted, we don't know that this particular statement is supported by sufficient corroborating circumstances. But this is a civil case, not a criminal case. So its not clear that it matters. but tbf, I am no lawyer.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:24 AM
9

The employer flat out said that they don't want to hire men. Sounds like proving it isn't a problem. confessions are always great in court.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:11 AM
1

I have no idea what you just said.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 07:16 AM
1

Go look at table 2. Even in the most recent time period that they looked at, most studies still confirmed the chivalry hypothesis: the hypothesis that women get shorter sentences. Granted, that is a bare majority. But, its higher than in the 70s and 80s. So, I am not convinced that the sentencing disparity is gone. Especially not when 62% of the estimates that control for priors, severity, and type support the chilvarly hypothesis. You also have this quote: Contrary to Daly and Tonry's expectati…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 07:13 AM
1

You are responding to the wrong argument, The issue here isn't all men vs all women. Its men who are incarcerated vs women who are incarcerated. People who are incarcerated tend to be poorer and less educated than the rest of the population. So, we can't assume that what is true of the general public is true of them. Women who are incarcerated are more likely to be parents than men who are incarcerated. Even if there are not any benefits to having women care for children over men, you still have…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:11 PM
3

I don't know if that is true. But if it is true, then that is another reason to take the discretion out of the hands of judicial officials.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:38 AM
3

True. Thanks for pointing that out. That is why I said "caregiver" instead of "mother." but that might have not been clear.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:38 AM
2

However these don't typically pan out for men in court because we don't really enforce them because the justice system is really expensive and carries great personal risk to enforce something like no consent. Could you give me an example of that?
/r/MensRights02/05/21 03:57 PM
4

You mean until we run out of snacks and there are no women around willing to make a run to the super-market to buy more.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:02 PM
9

A member of the house of lords proposed that all men in Britain be subject to a six PM curfew to make women safer and reduce discrimination. I object to this because I am a man with delayed phase sleep syndrome. I can't sleep at night. Subjecting me to a 6 PM curfew would prevent me from interacting with the outside world in most meaningful ways, because I am awake all night and asleep for most of the day. Its also not especially plausible. I don't know about Britain. But I do know that in the U…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:24 AM
-2

"Unlike women, it's unfair that men earn more after having children" completely ignoring that men face enormous pressure to work and provide more after having children and, unlike women who happily choose this, men rarely have the luxury to take the work/life balance, less income option. No that actually is discrimination against women. Without discrimination, both men and women would make more when they had children. Or neither would make more when they had children. A better example would be p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 09:42 PM
25

Most homeless people are men. https://endhomelessness.org/demographic-data-project-gender-and-individual-homelessness/ So prioritizing women and children goes against fulfilling the order to house everyone in 180 days. Yes, that article doesn't distinguish between adult men and children. But thankfully, there are hardly any homeless children in America. People under 18 only make up 1.4% of the homeless. (2017 AHAR: Part 1 - PIT Estimates of Homelessness in the U.S., exhibit 2.2). So that really …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/21 06:19 PM
1

First of all, the evidence on whether there is any bias in medicine with regards to clinical trials is mixed. Some studies find that women are under-represented. Some find that women are over-represented. There really isn't a clear consensus within the empirical literature. (Liu KA, DiPietro Mager NA. Women’s involvement in clinical trials: historical perspective and future implications. Pharmacy Practice 2016 Jan-Mar;14(1):708. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708) But actually getting to your …
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:22 AM
1

I doubt topics as broad as History or video games are things a person will tire of in the next decade, within both of those broad categories are multiple sub categories to explore. Well that is true. A better example would be an interest in the music of Neal Diamond, the thing that brought the main couple together in Saving Silverman. Interests in music tend to last. But not necessarily interests in specific artists. So if your relationship is based on common interests, then they need to be suit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 05:58 PM
0

but people are attracted to other people who share similar interests and seem put together and self-confident I am not sure that similar interests are such a great criteria. People's interests change a lot over time. But relationships can last up to the rest of your life. Common interests just are not a foundation for anything long-term. Imagine that two people have common interests in history and video games. They meet, they fall in love, they get married. Then one of them develops new interest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 12:25 AM
5

Patriarchy doesn't necessarily mean men being advantaged over women in all cases. It means rule by the father or fathers. But that presents a different problem: If fathers rule, fathers are men, and men suffer under patriarchy as well, then which men are suffering under patriarchy? If its the men who are not fathers, then why do fathers do more work than mothers? https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-myth-of-the-lazy-father If its all men suffering. Then the fathers are also suffering. So why don't the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 08:22 PM
2

Most children who get raped or killed get raped or killed by family members. If that man had been the child's uncle or father, the child would have had a greater chance of being preyed upon than if he was a stranger. No one would have called the police if he was the child's uncle or father. So calling the police when they have no relations to each other makes even less sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 08:59 PM
1

The reports from 2018 and 2020 also say that most violence against the person offenses had female victims in the home office data. They also all affirm that the difference between the home office data and the CSEW is the CSEW under-estimating domestic violence, which mostly happens to women. So, it looks like the official statistics do back this claim up. On the other hand, the reports for all 3 years also confirm that most violence that results in injury happens to men. https://www.ons.gov.uk/p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 08:38 PM
3

Question for Erin: How do you respond to those who argue that the data collected and published by governments proves gender asymmetry in domestic violence victimization rates?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/21 07:27 PM
25

The Equalities minister's argument is a non-sequitor. It doesn't follow from the system being designed with men in mind that the uniform requirement is beneficial. Things turnout to be detrimental to the very thing that they were designed for all the time. Pain killers can actually make headaches worse. Its true that the experiences that lead to imprisonment and the impact of imprisonment can be very different for men and women. But, that doesn't mean that they always are, or that what works for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/21 09:13 PM
4

Ultimately, then, what's the purpose of child support system? The states' incentives really are to set amounts that can be collected on that make it look like they are reaching collection goals. But the performance measures at the federal level are based on the proportion that you collect based on the proportion that's established. They didn't answer the question at all. But it is interesting to know that child-support was created to replicate the nuclear family, and now, many men just don't hav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 12:10 AM
5

The tragedy here is that Warren Farrel already pointed out how men face the disadvantages that blacks face when it comes to education, incarceration, and homelessness. But he didn't make the connection to intersectionality: how it can be cumulative, or to how blacks and men could work together to address those. Its clear that there is intersectionality, because as far as whites and blacks go, white women are the longest lived group and black men are the shortest lived group. https://www.mdch.sta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/21 05:26 AM
1

Of freshmen. This is a survey that is noting the gender of those people who don't know how they will pay for college but still attend. That may as well have written "more women take on large debt without a plan than men". It doesn't measure what you imply at all. But why are women more likely to worry about how they will afford tuition if they can get someone else to pay for it? All college? That's a silly way to measure. What exactly do you mean by "all college"? Are you talking about all colle…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 03:42 AM
1

The point being the opportunity cost. The people that I know who kept a STEM job in their field are about as many as those that I know who are now working as baristas or something else of similar relevance. But for the latter, not having gotten a STEM degree would put them ahead, including due to not having their professional career on their resume. I know about opportunity cost. I just don't get how having their professional career on their resume is a negative. Women can share their expenses w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 07:38 PM
1

I contest this. The lower earnings from post secondary is only in some cases worth the financial risk. If you can save 5k/year without a degree, and 10k/year with a degree, I'd opt for the former, because the that doesn't necessarily mean you can keep doing that indefinitely. That cuts both ways. Being able to save 5k without a degree doesn't mean that you can do that indefinitely. A bad economic situation and/or poor compatibility with the job you choose 5 years before being able to work in tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 07:19 AM
20

Men not going to college has harms for men, in the form of lower earnings and worse mental and physical health, and harms for the left, in the form of more men voting for right-wing parties. So its important to find some way to tackle the decline in enrollment among males caused by the pandemic from both perspectives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/21 05:21 AM
1

"Feminism" showed up ahead of "MensRights" for "sexist." Plus, MRAs call things sexist too when they affect men. I don't see the problem there. But "againstmensrights" showing up ahead of us for "misandry" when we have more members and discuss it all the time really doesn't seem right. Us showing up first for "discrimination" is fine. It could just be us arguing that discrimination exists and opposing it that causes that. "misogyny" having us show up first is questionable. That is not something …
/r/MensRights31/12/20 11:54 PM
4

Its true that in tribal and band societies war is a way for males to increase their reproductive success by getting other males killed in combat and acquiring resources from defeated enemies. But in the modern world, men in politics are not in reproductive competition with the men in the military who do the actual fighting. They are not in the same social classes. Modern warfare serves different purposes, like creating and maintaining political coalitions and paying back constituents and acquiri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/20 07:26 PM
11

I can't cry like I could when I was a kid. Tears come out of my eyes. But I can't really do full weeping anymore. Not since I was 13. Seeing stuff like "stop ruining young boys so y'all can hate them later for it." makes me feel less human.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 06:55 AM
-3

Lesbian couples are most violent, after bisexual couples and lesbian women have 2x rate of divorce as gay men. Where exactly did you get this? Patriarchy conspiracy theory.... The function of the term "conspiracy theory" is to de-legitimize ideas that threaten the powerful. Using it serves the status quo.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:41 PM
4

"Men are undeniably responsible for most of the rape and murder in the world." Depending on how you define rape, that isn't true. If you define rape as "unwanted sex" then men and women rape each other at about the same rate. (Warren Farrell. The Myth of Male Power). "We grade male violence on a curve—men of color receive far greater punishment, scrutiny and collective attention, while violence perpetrated by white men is far more invisible and still considered unexpected. The violence of white …
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:03 PM
6

His dad was very happy he was bad, but mentioned they couldn't really celebrate until the other kids were returned. don't you mean "Back"? not "bad"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/20 04:36 AM
2

This study was correlational. To make causal inferences, you need to do experiments. Plus, the authors declared 1 conflict of interest.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 05:18 PM
1

which page?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/20 07:16 AM
8

This is a disgrace. He didn't even know that he was bi until after they split up. He couldn't have told her that he was bi. What harm did his wife even suffer? What entitles her to damages? At least I know that, as a bisexual male, I shouldn't visit Spain anytime soon. But if we are being honest, I wasn't going to anyway, because of COVID-19 and my heritage being from other countries. Bi-erasure has happened to me. It did hurt emotionally. But not financially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/20 04:16 AM
1

Sorry it took so long to get back to you. But anyways, like Thomas Kuhn said in "The Structure of scientific revolutions." Scientists, even physical scientists, do not actually use data to determine the answers to meaningful questions. They assume the answers to meaningful questions, and interpret the data by those assumptions. So even if all these studies just assume that disparities are due to discrimination regardless of the data, that doesn't make them any less scientific than the hard scien…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/20 04:55 PM
1

If you voted for Joe Biden, then email or call his office and let them know that you want the live hearings and rules against prejudicing the investigation and adjudication process against the accused to stay!
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:48 PM
3

CRT What does CRT stand for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 07:21 AM
35

This represents a problem as Joe Biden, the presumptive President elect, and main opposition to right-wing politics in America, opposes live hearings for university students accused of sexual assault. Men or women can both be wrongfully accused of sexual assault. I don't know the actual statistics on who gets accused in general or wrongfully accused in particular. But the stories that the media picks up on tend to be of men being accused of sexual assault by women. So due process for those accus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 04:10 AM
1

I stopped seeing myself as just an individual once I read "The Myth of male power." I am a man. So which men still see themselves as individuals? Who are they? Where are they?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/20 05:54 PM
14

Men get longer prison sentences than women all ready. So this is backwards. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285086688_Gender_and_sentencing_A_meta-analysis_of_contemporary_research
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/20 11:17 PM
6

This doesn't surprise me. But then again, I am half Armenian. So I just assume that the Turkish will do the opposite of what I would have wanted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/20 04:58 PM
1

That men tend to be in worse health than women has now been made clear by robust evidence from various sources. That depends on which outcomes you measure. Men have higher mortality rates. But women have higher morbidity rates. Its called the health-survival paradox. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK242444/ In many societies, men generally enjoy more opportunities, privileges and power than women I don't think that that is as true as people tend to think. in the U.S., men are still in charg…
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:20 PM
1

Rebutting that argument with claims about Reddit is lame (I am differently abled. I can say it). Reddit is not the real world. But in the real world, MRAs file suit on behalf of men all the time, and frequently win. They actually do accomplish stuff. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/h80isc/but_mras_just_complain_about_feminism_they_dont/
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:56 PM
1

The wording wasn't mine. It was someone else's.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:24 PM
1

There are no men going around 'assaulting men' with the intent of murdering the entire race starting with the males. There have been, like in Kosovo and Rwanda. Then that wouldn't mean they are being attacked for being men, it would mean they are being attacked for unrelated reasons and men are just being targeted first. I guess I wasn't clear on what we meant by being assaulted for being men. But even if you don't count genocides where the intent is to exterimate everyone, male or female, and j…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:23 PM
1

is this really the case? If the women just said 'no', the men would have no problem with that? They probably would. But unless the men want to do it themselves, they couldn't exactly do much about it. It is extremely relevant. Something is either societal or personal. Men attacking men for being men is pretty dumb. Circumcision is both societal and personal. Its voluntarily practiced by couples and permitted by the state. Same with genocides and blood feuds, genocides must ultimately be approved…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 10:36 PM
1

is it? are the men not involved in this at all? Do they not perpetuate this custom? Is it not a cultural norm? The men approve of it. But the women are still ultimately the ones that do it. I mean the same thing is with the circumcision of the US, men do it to us too, but its different when you have something being legal versus random assholes attacking another man for being a man, which isn't a thing. Can't say that I agree with that, in both cases, its men inflicting bodily harm on someone els…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 09:27 PM
1

but if men are being assaulted randomly, which it would have to be for just being men, it tends to be by other men. So what? female circumcision is done by other women. Its still considered gender based violence.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 08:28 PM
1

The conclusions are not better. But I think that they way they are explicated is better. Nietzsche is a very good writer, at least by the standards of philosophers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/20 09:34 PM
1

Not from the spread that these studies give. I mean most is obviously too low of a bar. As far as I know, Twice as many studies find discrimination against women as don't. Most is too low are bar. But what about 2/3? Maybe that wouldn't even be enough in the absence of an observed statistical wage gap. But in the presence of an observed statistical wage gap, and experiments that find discrimination in the direction that you would expect, it seems like its more work to avoid the conclusion that d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/20 02:25 AM
1

Well they don't seem to get repeatable results. Something must be interesting to cause that. Some kind of noise. Well obviously we are getting either false positives or false negatives. But if most of the results are positive, then isn't the natural conclusion that the negatives are the false results? You might come up with some sure. The issue is then I would be able to come up with a situation where those rules don't work (or the situation would just occur). We could go on until the end of tim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 09:29 AM
1

It sounds like the study isn't very good at getting a result that is more than statistical noise. How do you figure? What makes you think that these results are just statistical noise? Because you can rank it, just not in abstract. I can look at two crimes and tell you which I think is worse and why. What I can't do is transport that to another context where other variables have changed and expect it to be consistent. And there is simply too many variables with too many complicated interactions …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 07:40 AM
1

These are cherry picked studies. I can find you examples where they did the exact same study and got the opposite results. There are studies that get the opposite results, The paper reported on one of them. With the trial that you are talking about, that makes two studies that find discrimination against men in hiring. But they reported 4 studies that found discrimination against women in hiring. So, it sounds like most studies find discrimination against women. Granted, 6 studies isn't many. Bu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 06:49 AM
1

It's experimental in the sense that they experiment with twisting the statistics in any way they can to prove discrimination that doesn't exist. I mean if you want to point to something specific in that study we can talk about it, but in general what that study is doing is trying to show discrimination by looking at outcomes. This literally never works and will always be assuming equality of input. I was talking about the studies from the review of the literature within that paper. For example, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 04:16 AM
0

No and no. But that is irrelevant. Because we have experimental evidence of discrimination against women in the labor market.https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20160995 So even if men do work harder, women still have a disadvantage. Men get longer prison sentences for the same crime. I would call that a disadvantage. https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/Bontrager%2C%20Gender%20and%20Sentencing%202013.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/20 08:50 PM
3

The nationalism was actually his sister. But the other stuff, the belief that men are only good for fighting and women are only good for making more men (Thus Spoke Zarathustra), and the desire for a tiny cabal of intellectually superior men to run everything https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15665399.2007.10819958 was all Nietzsche himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/20 04:37 PM
2

He was anti-nationalist and anti-anti-semetic. But he was also anti-egalitarian and anti-feminist. He had his mouthpiece Zarathustra say that men are only good for fighting, and women are only good for making more men. He was what Nazis call a "Responsible Conservative."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/20 04:13 PM
3

There are lots of better thinkers on the right. Go read any of Bryan Caplan's books or James Buchannon's books. Of course that is my bias, I studied economics in school. But there are also right-wing philosophers who are worth reading, like Nietzche.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/20 05:45 AM
-3

Well males do have economic privilege in the form of higher earnings and higher net worth. They just have disadvanteges in other areas like life-expectancy, education, and criminal sentencing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/20 04:17 AM
-1

Do you literally mean deathly poison? like if are trans your body's own hormones will kill you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/20 01:39 PM
-1

But in the scenario that you described, the body map doesn't necessarily agree with the anatomy. So, what is "wrong" that the brain knows? The body-map is just your own perception of your body, isn't it? https://www.hilaryking.net/glossary/body-mapping
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/20 06:28 AM
-5

The definition from the APA for gender identity is how one identifies as male or female. https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf You can deconstruct that concept. "male" and "female" are about which gametes you produce and whether you bear children or not. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/male https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female Its not exactly up to you, its up to nature, unless you get your reproductive organs surgically removed or altered. Some …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/20 04:37 AM
2

Threatening someone's life is illegal. But she is clearly the one who started this. Honestly, it sounds like neither of you are really in the right.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 08:54 PM
2

Laughing at this isn't enough. We need to figure out what reasoning would make this make sense. I believe it goes something like this: The ultimate source of society's problems are the idea that men and women are and/or should be different types of people. So we can solve the pay gap, the life expectancy gap, and domestic violence by making dresses for men and cod-pieces for women. It probably goes without saying. But I don't agree with that way of thinking. Taking a page from Nigel Barber, you …
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:05 AM
12

My response is that its true that most crimes are committed by men. But its also true that its mostly committed by young poor men. (Edward Glaesier, Triumph of The City). People don't consider that as an argument that something is wrong with the mindset or culture of young people or poor people. So holding men to a different standard than those other two groups doesn't make much sense. Most people who murder Children are women. (UNODOC global study on child homicide 2019). Most people don't thin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/20 06:47 PM
6

It is weird that leftists believe that material conditions dictate consciousness, except when it comes to men. As if men alone are not products of their environments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/20 09:44 AM
67

Someone did point out that she tried to kill you. There is hope. People are not blind to women's capacity for harm. But more importantly, report this to the police. That is attempted murder. Would you really let that slide from anyone else?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:18 AM
8

Latner proposed several times and Climans accepted. He often referred to her by his last name. However, he insisted she sign a marriage contract and came up with several drafts. She refused. You really shouldn't be able to claim that you are legally someone's spouse and claim financial support if they propose marriage, and you refuse. You can't have it both ways. You can't be married when its convenient but be boyfriend and girlfriend when it isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/20 08:10 AM
3

a small article on how women are responsible too for traditional gender roles and you will be cursified ! When did that happen? I ask because I would like to read such an article.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/20 06:53 AM
16

How exactly do you tell "brigading" from content just naturally eliciting a negative reaction?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/20 06:45 AM
2

The first part doesn't make sense in a heterosexual context. Every time a woman dates a man, a man dates a woman. The only way it can be true is if lesbians and bi women are dating more than gay and bi men. Which is possible. But I don't think its what people are talking about when they say things like that. The second part kind of makes sense without men being just worse partners than women. Women generally have higher standards for their partners than men. https://www.jstor.org/stable/350044?s…
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:40 PM
8

Or: "Men do better than women? Its because of discrimination against women. Women do better than men? Its also because of discrimination against women." Its a heads I win tales you lose argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/20 06:25 PM
18

Same problem as most feminist attempts to address men's problems. They attribute men's problems to internal rather than external factors. The problems that are caused by internal factors, people just solve as individuals. You don't need a movement to solve those.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/20 04:12 PM
8

Intimate Partner Violence: New Perspectives in Research and Practice 1st Edition, Kindle Edition by Elizabeth A. Bates (Editor), Julie C. Taylor (Editor, Contributor) ​ https://www.amazon.com/Intimate-Partner-Violence-Perspectives-Research-ebook/dp/B07QF2Z1QX/ref=sr_1_7?dchild=1&keywords=Intimate+Partner+Violence&qid=1596093929&sr=8-7 ​ The Myth of Male Power Warren Farrell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/20 07:27 AM
4

I don't think that that is what "fragile masculinity" is supposed to mean. There is a difference between challenging a man's masculinity, and threatening his life.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 06:01 AM
3

"The reward and learning systems in our brains work in close cooperation," he said. "Empirical studies show that girls are rewarded with praise for prosocial behavior, implying that their reward systems learn to expect a reward for helping behavior instead of selfish behavior. "With this in mind, the gender differences that we observed in our studies could best be attributed to the different cultural expectations placed on men and women." I don't like that concept "cultural expectations." Its id…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/20 05:50 PM
5

I think that the socio-economic and socio-sexual circumstances of a group of people dictate its ideology. Not the other way around. I got the idea from this book by Nigel Barber. "The Myth of Culture."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/20 05:19 AM
7

My response to that is to just say that its getting causality wrong. Material conditions dictate consciousness, not the other way around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/20 05:14 AM
8

I am pretty sure that it is true. There is an under-representation among business and political leaders among women, and a gap in earnings, that men don't have. But men have over-representation among the homeless and the incarcerated, and a life-expectancy gap, that women do not suffer from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/20 05:04 AM
3

Have you talked to an attorney? Depending on what jurisdiction you are in, there might be a way out of this.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:54 AM
1

If you include data from prisons, women are as likely to be sexual predators as men are. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308844135_Sexual_Victimization_Perpetrated_by_Women_Federal_Data_Reveal_Surprising_Prevalence
/r/MensRights10/07/20 09:24 PM
16

Just to be clear, these studies are specifically about academia. So they can't speak to hiring or promotion bias in other fields, at least not necessarily.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/20 02:43 AM
2

College is expensive. But less so if you do 2 years at a community college then another 2 years at an in state public school. But most importantly, the after-tax rate of return on college is the same as every other investment. Its not an especially good move financially. But its not a bad move either. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2551567 I knew lots of good people at college. I went to school with lots of military and ex military personal. They tend to be pretty gregarious…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 06:29 AM
1

I thought that this was a pro equality space.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 06:16 AM
2

If a man sucks, it's a structural problem and dismissing it as individual is privilege; if a woman sucks, it's an individual problem and framing it as structural is misogyny What exactly do you mean by that? I think that you mean that a structural problem is a problem with the entire group instead of just the individual in question. But I am not 100% sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/20 10:02 PM
11

Occasionally however it results in a 'boys will be boys' pile of man-hate about how men with autism or disability get infantilised, held to a lower standard than women, and forgiven for acting out, expressing bigotry or disrespecting someone's boundaries (generally but not always women). OK, this conversation IS 'triggering' for me, but it's a phenomenon which happens, a lot of the women in there are hurting, so it's not unreasonable to host. How often do men with autism get held to a lower stan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 03:33 AM
6

The problem isn't focusing on gender inequality rather than wealth inequality. Its possible to walk and chew gum at the same time. So if people who have money want to donate it to worthy causes, that is a win. The problem is that they think that gender equality only means helping women. We actually do know of discrimination against men, like in criminal sentencing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 02:23 AM
1

I physically can't cry. I can get tears in my eyes. But I can't weep like I could when I was a kid. I haven't really been able to fully cry since I was a teenager.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/20 03:33 AM
3

The claim that it's not privilege because "men decided it should be that way" chauvinistically erases the agency of both female jurors - who will make up 50% of any non-biased jury pool, whereas black jurors will average 13% and are also more likely to be systematically eliminated from the pool by prosecutors - and the women who push these gender stereotypes on their male children. Its also a hypocritical argument because feminists usually say that things that advantage men over women are exampl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 03:53 AM
3

men not being whiners, and thinking of personal success is good in many if not most ways, I don't agree with that first part. The point of that word "whining" is to de-legitimize complaints without actually addressing them. Saying that not being a whiner is a good thing is really just saying that accepting what society gives you instead of asking for what you think is right is a good thing. But focusing on personal success is usually a good thing. That is what we mean by doing what is right for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 03:50 AM
2

I also have that fantasy of being an EMT and getting a mate by saving their life. I never acted on it mostly because I prefer desk work. The idea of being a hero is even more appealing than the sex and relationship part, at least in fantasy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 11:54 PM
2

Well, if you do realize your needs, then you do make yourself content. But if you can't then you have a great deal of need of grief, which is what happens when things are outside your control, like if someone close to you died. Or, you lost your job in the pandemic. There are many ways of griefing. Some of the most commons are crying and searching for empathy. Crying works because what crying is is expelling extra neurotransmisors in your tears. You are literally taking out pain that is in your …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 09:15 PM
2

People who are in a more authentical state feel more loving and loved because only if you express your vulnerability you can actually be helped. You can only have people act in a way that helps you if you tell them what you want or need. It makes sense that expressing vulnerability makes you feel more loved when you put it that way. But how does it make you feel more loving?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 03:27 AM
1

As long as you are human the drives that are there are there. They make you unhappy in the inside and if you don't pay attention to it they cause you more pain. The needs you have that are not met cause you pain whether you are cosncious of them or not. That is the reason why contact with feelings is important. If you are not aware of your pain, and cut contact with your feelings, you may become depressed, bored about life, uninterested in living, etc. That sounds reasonable. But its missing the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 03:26 AM
2

People who are in a more authentical state are more content and calm because they are no longer fighting against the reality that they are indeed vulnerable, that they indeed have drives. I think that it would be the other way around, that accepting that you have drives would make you less content, because now you need to think about the ways in which those drives are not being met. That is the opposite of contentment. People who are in a more authentical state feel more free and competent becau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/20 08:48 PM
7

When I said "That sounds too familiar." I meant that it sounds too much like me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 06:49 AM
5

" I probably do meet the clinical definition of psychopathy now, for lack of ability to make meaningful, positive life experiences or to choose anything. " uh oh. That sounds too familiar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 06:26 AM
15

Lucas's mom had him model himself after Ru-Paul's drag race. That show is about drag queens, which are not the same thing as trans-women. Drag-queens can dress as men when they are not performing and don't intend to remove their dicks. Plus, she got mad at him for liking a girl when transwomen are attracted to cis-women all the time. So the mom really doesn't know how being trans works.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:58 AM
1

Violence and Abuse are not exactly the same thing. Abuse has to be the attempt to control someone else. Violence can just be the attempt to cause harm for any reason. (Lisa Conradi, Robert Gefner. "Female Offenders of Intimate Partner Violence current controversies, research, and treatment approaches." introduction to part 2.) But neither of them made that distinction. So lets just look at the evidence around violence. Its true that lifetime victimization reports show women being more likely to …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:52 AM
1

Not exactly. In Marxism, the term "ideology" has a very specific meaning. The authors of Critical Psychology: An Introduction (Second Edition) define it aptly: "the set of ideas inculcated by dominant sectors of society to justify elite power and the society's established institutions" (p. 18). Any belief system that functions to support the ruling class is ideological, according to this usage, even if it's spuriously scientific. I didn't know that. Thank you. But how is it relevant? What have I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 08:36 PM
2

The army personnel who I have interacted with say that in the Army, most of the rape is man on man, not man on women and/or children. The army recruiter I watched on Youtube, Yusha Thomas, says that the only reason anyone signs up in real life is that they are broke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 07:43 PM
4

This idea goes way further back than you think, it goes back to the 80s. Its just that they call it "Hegemonic" masculinity rather than "toxic" masculinity. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706037/pdf/tchs-17-112.pdf ​ But my position is that the problem with the concept of "toxic" or "hegemonic" masculinity is that it is idealist. It locates the problem at the ideas held or perpetuated by a certain group. Normally, leftists recognize that its materiality (economic and political con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 09:21 AM
1

A shortage of marriage aged men means that women can't find husbands. So they have to settle for one night stands. So they start selecting guys based on physicality, and the appearance thereof, because then personality and providing ability really don't matter. So then guy start fighting more to prove their physicality and masculinity, because that is what it takes to find a short-term partner as a straight man, and in that environment, getting a long-term partner is easy for straight men. So th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/20 12:22 AM
1

That is not much of an argument. Governments could change their tax codes and budgets so that men and women had equal fiscal impacts if they really wanted to. Here is a better argument: Women are the limiting factor in reproduction. So, any society that is worried about overpopulation, should be trying to limit the number of females before they try to limit the number of males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/20 06:29 PM
6

To be clear, societies with shortages of marriage aged men tend to be more violent and less happy (The Myth of Culture by Nigel Barber). So this idea doesn't work on utilitarian grounds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 07:39 PM
1

How is the freedom to move about freely hard fought for women?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:41 PM
4

Stop insinuating and say what you mean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/20 11:00 PM
4

Good video. But how is it relevant to male issues?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/20 08:45 PM
4

My interaction with the movement is entirely through books and internet forums. But I can try to answer your questions. ​ Men's rights activism is an attempt to bring attention to and remedy discrimination against men. This one I am not sure I understand. If you mean what beliefs underlie the movement, then there isn't really a definitive singular set of doctrines that underlie the entire thing. Some MRA writers like Helen Smith lean more towards the biological essentialist side. Others like War…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:33 AM
2

When I pee sitting down, I tend to accidentally wet my pants and underpants. I understand the logic of privatizing the mess, so it at least doesn't inconvenience others. But cleaning up urine and feces is part of the job that cleaners get paid for. Asking someone to do the job that they are all ready getting paid for isn't an injustice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 04:16 AM
14

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. When people say that circumcision does not affect the penis itself, what they mean is: It doesn't affect the part of the penis that remains after circumcision. It categorically affects the penis as a whole by removing the most sensitive part of it. https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:28 AM
18

You can also use crime rate statistics to justify hating black people. So racists must be really smart.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:30 AM
1

According to your logic, contemporary American English, which, like all language varieties, is sociohistorically unique, must exist in people's heads prior to its institutionalization. This stance is incoherent, namely because the vast sociohistorical variability of language, which undergoes morphological transformation over too short a time to be attributable to biological evolution, points to the ineluctable conclusion that specific varieties lack some particular, genetic basis, a claim that i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/20 08:36 PM
1

(Connor is not saying that culture as a theoretical construct lacks explanatory power. I am unsure why you feel she implied this.) It was that line "culture predicts but does not cause behavior." I thought that by "cause" she meant "explain." Here, Connor is getting at the fact that while culture establishes the parameters of behavior, allowing us to make general predictions, it does not independently generate specific outcomes in a mechanistic fashion that can be reliably and accurately deduced…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 10:35 PM
1

My comment there was more a response to your apparent tendency to think in terms of Western economic theory. Again, economics, like biological determinism, is largely ideological. Because of this, you should take caution when analyzing human behavior on its terms. I assume that by "ideological" you mean "unscientific." I can't agree with that assessment. economics employs the same methods as the other observational sciences. ​ You are again overextrapolating here with a false abstraction. Just b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 10:10 PM
9

From the Guardian source you cited Patricia Faraldo Cabana, a law professor at the university of A Coruña, who helped Podemos draft the legislation, said the proposal understood consent not just as something verbal but also tacit, as expressed in body language. “It can still be rape even if the victim doesn’t resist,” she said. “If she is naked, actively taking part and enjoying herself, there is obviously consent. If she’s crying, inert like an inflatable doll and clearly not enjoying herself, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 02:08 AM
1

The real question is: Why are the young men hanging out outside in front of supermarkets instead of in restaurants and bars? What do people do outside of supermarkets for fun?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:08 PM
2

Actually, that first quote is kind of true. Boys are more likely to experience stress during the period of neural pruning than girls are, which inhibits the formation of important connections. So men are more likely statistically to kill you than women are. But that isn't really their fault. They didn't get the same chance to develop that their female equivalents did. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-athletes-way/201312/scientists-identify-why-girls-often-mature-faster-boys
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 09:32 PM
1

I didn't know that. But is that really unusual for Australia historically? Is the size of the Right's advantage any bigger than it usually gets?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 03:20 AM
1

In a world whose history is one of empire, slavery, and legally enshrined class distinctions, that is a distinction without a difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 07:45 PM
1

Fair point. This doesn't apply to countries with compulsory voting. But are any of those countries really seeing a collapse in support for the political left? I know about Brazil electing Bolsonaro. But that was in part because of the most popular leftist politician in the country getting busted for corruption. That doesn't apply to other countries. Nor does it have anything to do with the issues raised in this piece.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 02:47 PM
2

This argument is predicated on two wrong understandings of how politics works The idea that people are leaving the left for the right. There are hardly any swing voters. The shifts in the electoral fortunes of parties are due to turn out. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/02/06/rachel-bitecofer-profile-election-forecasting-new-theory-108944 Conservatives just want to conserve the status quo. That is what the name "conservatism" would make you think. But if you look at what they actuall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 10:25 AM
11

The employment equity act only covers 10% of workers. So it isn't helping. But I don't think that its the primary cause. Something else that you should be looking at is the labor force participation rate. Its still higher for men than for women in alberta. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/2a8604a8-5f18-4c06-8556-de76b43e2458/resource/784afeb9-2045-4455-86d3-e05fe1586b33/download/0619201569labourforceparticipationratesbysexonepage.pdf It could just be that only the most employable women bother to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/20 06:24 PM
8

Being required to stick with someone who you don't love wouldn't make life better for anyone, when you get right down to it, no-fault divorce isn't the problem. The fact that the courts won't enforce pre-nups is the problem. The part that couples fight about the most is child-custody. But judges won't enforce pre-nup provisions about child-custody. If the courts had to enforce every part of the pre-nup no matter what, then divorce would be less painful, and less expensive, for both men and women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/20 04:31 AM
4

I don't know about research from an evolutionary perspective. But there is research on female on male rape from a criminological perspective. https://malesurvivor.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/StempleFloresMeyer2016femaleperpetators.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 04:20 AM
1

What exactly are they trying to illustrate?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:37 PM
7

Responding to discontent with Spain’s sexual violence laws, the leftwing government has approved a bill to qualify all non-consensual sex as rape. Previously a perpetrator had to have used physical violence or intimidation for an assault to be classified as rape. I am fine with that part. If you include the prison population, men get raped as often as women do, and its usually by women. https://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf Plus, the f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/20 08:01 AM
1

How do you figure?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:37 AM
1

Whether fathers or mothers are more likely to physically abuse their children varies from study to study. But the most severe physical violence is committed by fathers. The most common kind of child abuse, emotional abuse, also appears to be mostly committed by fathers. https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/who-abuses-children So I understand the focus on fathers.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 06:19 PM
3

I nodded. I knew that universities could lose federal funding if they didn't show they were protecting students, and I was glad — I am glad — for that. But I was still confused. Melanie continued. "If we find out that — and Marta asked the question — if we find out that the information is false, for our purposes that's not really our end goal; we're just trying to determine whether or not there's a policy violation." For some reason the law doesn't consider "protecting students" to extend to giv…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 05:56 AM
3

I didn't ask you if you do it. I asked you if it was painful. Would you say its more likely to be pleasant to say something that others will disagree with? Or more likely to be painful? I will tell my conservative parents that global warming is real. I will tell people on Wikipedia that most of the relevant literature says that men's motives for intimate partner violence are mostly the same as women's motives for intimate partner violence. But I don't do it for fun. I only ever did it when I fel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 04:48 AM
2

I said people who share your likes. Not people who like something else. Isn't it still painful to say something when you know or believe that everyone is going to disagree with it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 04:37 AM
3

Words words words words words words words My word Holmes! You've cracked the case! It is words!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 03:33 AM
3

That makes sense. But don't you still care about what people who share your likes think of you? Isn't it still painful to say something when you think that no one else will agree with it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 03:20 AM
8

Gender is actually a lot of fun. There’s nothing more liberating than living authentically, standing up for what you believe in, and not giving a fuck what anyone else thinks of you. That is a lie. Its never actually fun to fight for what you believe in when no one else agrees with you. Everyone cares about what someone else thinks of them. Human beings are social animals. Edit: Living authentically, or at least, the feeling of living authentically, doesn't come from not giving a fuck what anyon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 02:53 AM
1

The way I deal with that is to just remember that men and women both have it bad in individual ways, women make less money. Men die sooner. Women are less likely to get to the top of the ladder, become a CEO or elected official. Men are more likely to end up on the bottom of the ladder, and become homeless or incarcerated. Don't feel bad because things are tough all over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 04:14 AM
-2

That story is sad. But there are people who were born in male bodies whose brains end up more like those of women. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re8d7SZ3Ys0 There is also some evidence that transexuality is rooted in a completely different psychology than that described in this article. The boy in this story believed that he needed to be a girl to be loved. But there is evidence that male to females who are interested in women (transbians) are just suffering from erotic target location error: …
/r/MensRights17/03/20 06:28 AM
2

It was this document: https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/communications/wfp203758.pdf ​ World wide, women are a minority of the human race. But they are a majority of the chronically hungry, if these people are right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/20 09:47 PM
10

Lets see if I can understand their reasoning: Women are over-represented among the chronically hungry. So its more important to get food to women than it is to men. Young men have a tendency to push their way to the front of the line and steal food from others. So you can ensure that food gets to the people who are more likely to need it by giving out food coupons that only women can redeem, and trusting the women to distribute the food to the men. But here is the problem with that: If men can't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/20 07:22 PM
2

40% traditionalist, 75% liberal feminist, 40% radical feminist, 49% Marxist Feminist, 37% cultural feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/20 09:19 AM
7

Here is the full report. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hd_perspectives_gsni.pdf One example: In the 50 countries where adult women are more educated than men, they still receive on aver-age 39 percent less income than men—despite devoting more time to work.8 I went to reference 8. It said: Calculations based on data from UNDP 2019, Statistical table 4. I pulled it up here: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf Went to table 4.1, which is what I assume that they are talkin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 01:14 AM
3

Only the data for China.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 03:38 AM
2

They do feel different. But lots of things feel different without actually being different. "I utilized pressurized H20 to halt the combustion." feels different than "I put the fire out with water." Even though they are describing the same event.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:27 PM
1

It seems like at that point your theory is not disprovable, anytime you fail to connect with someone else, your interest can be written off as insincere or inauthentic. Its the same trick that the purveyors of "The Rules" use to defend their advice when it doesn't work out. “You probably just don’t like her enough. You can argue but we won’t agree!” Its what they say whenever someone follows their advice and it doesn't work. https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2014/feb/25/science-…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 05:42 AM
2

It sounds like they should be different. But I can't say exactly how they are different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 02:22 AM
1

Operant conditioning is about more than overcoming the will of another person. You can use operant conditioning on yourself to change habits that you don't like, and develop new ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 08:57 PM
1

That all sounds reasonable. But that doesn't necessarily make it true. That article that you cited didn't mention anything about standardized tests or rewards based teaching making children dislike school. I understand the mechanism behind Godhart's law: Once rewards and punishments are introduced, and people are aware of them, then they will alter and optimize their behavior to achieve their own desired results, rather than the results desired by whoever came up with the rewards and punishments…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 11:45 PM
1

I think that I understand all of that, if by "need" you mean "something that you need to be happy." and by "free action" you mean "intentional action, as opposed to an inadvertent action." That is a perfectly sensible definition of authenticity. But is it really the secret to getting women? I read about a study that found that, in heterosexual couples, men and women are both more "connected" when their conversation is about the woman, in the context of speed dates. https://news.stanford.edu/news…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 10:26 PM
2

So by violence you meant any harmful action. That is a fair definition of violence. I am just not sure how accurate it actually is to say that using rewards to modify behavior necessarily leads to harm. People use operant conditioning to do lots of things that seem innocuous, like training their pets, or getting their children to do chores and homework. Saying that it has to lead to some sort of harm seems like an awfully big thing to prove.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 09:56 PM
1

To the extent that economic theoretical orientations (of which there are plenty) justify capitalism or inequality in general, they are similarly ideological and should be dismissed as such. I have seen serious scholars on the far right reject the rational actor paradigm and use it to argue for more capitalism and less democracy. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691138732/the-myth-of-the-rational-voter So just reflexively jumping on the rational actor paradigm might not help you fi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 03:35 AM
1

which a cultural rather than individualistic (victim blaming) analysis reveals is resultant of sociocultural and political-economic factors that are beyond anyone's control as individuals (and which are incidentally responsible for all life outcomes). If sociocultural and political economic factors determine all life-outcomes, then what tools remain to individuals to modify their cultures? Supposing that individuals can modify their cultures, doesn't that just collapse back into putting the resp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 03:27 AM
1

This is not the view of Ratner or other cultural psychologists. Rather than culture independently interacting with psychology to produce specific behaviors, the relationship here is actually dialectical I have heard of dialectics. But I don't quite grasp what you mean by that term. Can you give me an example of culture and psychology having such a relationship? One implication of the cyclical, transactional relationship between cultures and psyches is that culture is not an independent variable.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 03:27 AM
5

Interesting analyses. But there is something important that I cannot endorse. The idea that "culture" is an independent variable in human behavior. Culture really can't be observed except in the thing that it is supposed to affect, human behavior. So it doesn't really allow us to differentiate the cause from the effect. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13000740-the-myth-of-culture You have the same problem with "society." Like here from "The Sociological Perspective." The basic insight of soc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 10:45 PM
2

Yes, in those instances we are more authentic. I don't know why the author of the article seems to believe that authentic people are more different between each other. On the contrary, authentic people behave more harmonically between them. Because it is the differences between things from which we derive our definitions. Everything that exists, exists by virtue of possessing properties that differentiate it from everything else. So if there exists an authentic or true self, then it must be defi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 07:10 PM
2

I think the best I can do is taking a few specific examples of nonphysical addiction, which will help me talk about what is the issue with addictions, and thus rewards. So, in addiction to videogames, the main issue is their need for self-realization, and also play. So you are channeling the need for self-realization into there. That is the reward. The reward is towards a behaviour. And because of this, if the person engages in that behaviour it will become disconnected from its other needs. It …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 06:30 PM
2

So really "being yourself" ultimately means "becoming the person whom you would like others to see you as." I always thought that it meant the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 01:37 AM
2

The problem is not that you cannot condition someone to do something out of obedience, fear or the desire for a reward. It is that mostly you can only convince someone to be violent through this means. But that isn't true. You can condition people to do all sorts of things, both violent and non-violent, through rewards and punishment. Its called Operant Conditioning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning#Applied_behavior_analysis What you are actually doing when you try to convince …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 01:26 AM
2

Personally, now that I'm more myself, people describe me as more confident. I think I give less a fuck of what people think of me. I read that everyone feels more "themselves" when others perceive them the way that they want to be perceived. So its possible that you just care less about what people think of you, because you now take it for granted that they will think something good about you. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/authenticity-under-fire/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 01:03 AM
1

But you're not going to accomplish that by hiding bits and pieces of who you are. You're going to get it by making the you that you present to the world more in line with how you want people to see you. What exactly is the difference?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 01:01 AM
1

I am not so sure about that. I read in Scientific American that people feel the most authentic when they feel that they are perceived by others the way that they want to be perceived by others. So not worrying about how you appear in social context might be the opposite of what makes people feel most "themselves." https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/authenticity-under-fire/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 12:56 AM
3

If you try to destroy one part, that part will become harder, darker, and it will become more violent and like.... entitled, for a lack of better word. If you don't listen to the needs of one of your fragments, that part of you becomes angry and entitled. It may decide that it hates you or it hates others, it may try to cause you self-harm, etc. That sounds good. But how do you reconcile it with pavlovian conditioning? Doesn't the fact that people can be conditioned to like or dislike things tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 08:36 PM
1

But that is the issue: to become yourself you need to accept yourself. If you are struggling inside you'll have parts of you fighting each other. Maybe they hate each other because they are not listened to and you are actively trying to destroy them and destroy themselves (sth like that is what was happening to me). But the solution is usually to listen to them, not repress them. But the parts of you that want to repress the other parts are also part of you. What do you do with them? Do you try …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 05:38 PM
1

So what "showing up and being yourself." means in this case is actually expressing your romantic and sexual desires. That is good advice. Women can't read minds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 05:21 PM
1

Those are good examples. But I am not sure that it really applies to the situation that OP was talking about. It sounds like his friend's problem has less to do with hiding his interests and vulnerabilities and more to do with just assuming that women will take extreme displeasure if he expresses interest in them. Maybe his problem isn't so much that he isn't being himself as it is that he has a poor self-image and/or believes that women are sexless?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 07:37 AM
3

You need to be more in contact with your feelings. Not because it is a more "feminist" thing to you, but because you will have no fucking idea of what you want unless you make contact with you. I am not so sure that that applies to this case. The person in the letter sounded like he knew what he was feeling: romantic and sexual frustration. It sounded more like he was just assuming that his feelings of sexual and romantic interest could never be reciprocated because either women are sexless, he …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 02:50 AM
3

the myself of today is completely uncensored. It doesn't sound that way. You have only described the vulnerabilities, insecurities, and interests that you were hiding in the broadest possible terms. Someone who was completely uncensored would have given at least one concrete example. ​ now i feel more free to talk about them and about myself outside of groups of trusted friends. and hoo boy has it changed a lot for me. Like what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 02:45 AM
3

Or, it could just be that yourself is an obedient person who doesn't know what they want. More importantly, paying more attention to what you want and less attention to what you think that you should be doing can be good advice. But it can also be bad advice. Some people might just want something innocuous like friends, or financial security. Some people might want something noble, like to make life better for others. But some other people might turn out to want to destroy themselves through dru…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 02:19 AM
3

But what are you now doing that is more "yourself" than what you used to be doing? What makes it more "yourself" than what you used to do? What aspects of yourself do you consider to define yourself that you were not embodying in the past? If you were not embodying them in the past, then in what sense were those aspects part of "yourself" back before you changed your ways?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 10:42 PM
10

People out there find love when they learn to show up and be themselves. I know, you’re shy. That’s why you have to practice a little, and make a few mistakes. Stop trying to protect yourself. Stop trying to control the outcome. Stop trying to remain perfect and harmless and blameless. Turn off that twisted brain of yours for once and just say what you want and ask what she wants. This is a confused way of thinking: "Be yourself. But also completely change your mindset and the way you relate to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 04:40 PM
4

I have heard of guys getting raped by women, then having other women tell them that they were not raped, because the person that did it was a woman. In my experience attitudes towards that stuff really don't vary by sex that much.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 08:29 AM
4

There is definitely a perception that we live in a man's world. But in my experience its feminist rhetoric that perpetuates that perception. No one who publicly declares that we live in a man's world frames it as a positive. The problem with their diagnosis of men's problems is that it is idealist. It locates a groups problems in attitudes and beliefs that that group holds. Their are two problems with that: 1. Simultaneity. People will sometimes adjust their beliefs to correspond to their behavi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 10:54 PM
1

I think I see where you are going with this. Women are allowed to have different risk preferences than men. So even if men are fine with strange men approaching them with a greater risk of getting attacked than when they approach women. Women are still allowed to not like strange men approaching them. However, if your risk preferences are such that you don't want half the population approaching you when you are alone in a public space, you really shouldn't expect the rest of humanity to accommod…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/20 07:04 PM
3

I stand by that claim. If you have a problem with men approaching you when you are alone, just because they are men, then the issue is really with you and your fears and the stereotypes that you hold about men. I say that because the people who are actually the most likely to be attacked or killed by men, other men, don't seem to mind it when men approach them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/20 03:36 PM
3

It doesn't look like women are any less violent than men, just that they tend to pick on people who are their size or smaller. What are you talking about? That paper says that women are only 14% of violent offenders. And even then, most of their victims are not strangers, like they are with men. As for violent, forcible sexual assault, I'll concede that is a male dominated crime. According to the FBI it's 2 percent of crime reported to the police. Considering cultural and social bias against men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/20 09:11 PM
7

A visible gun is asking to be beaten up to steal your gun. Actually trying to steal a gun off of an armed person is asking to get shot. There are scenarios where someone would do that. But most of the time it isn't worth the risk. Moreover, men are more likely to be victims of violence at the hands of strangers than women are. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vvcs9310.pdf Most homicide is men killing men. https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/ncvrw/2017/images/en_artwork/Fact_Sheets/2017NCVRW_Ho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/20 07:00 PM
12

I get where most of these are coming from. But number 2. Just seems ridiculous. I have had women approach me while I was walking alone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/20 05:33 AM
3

Its under the graphic "gender integration." Men assign 20% more work to men. Women assign 20% more work to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 07:05 PM
2

Lets just take this report at face value. What they found was that men and women complete the same percentage of work that is assigned to them. But women get assigned more work. Men and women are both more likely to assign work to the same sex than the opposite sex. What that means is: Women are doing more work, because other women are giving them more work. If you want the sexes to do the same amount of work, then you need to get women to assign more work to male sub-ordinates. How women end up…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 06:01 PM
5

Governments need to do this stuff in house. If a civil servant refuses to hand over documents to their superior, the government can just fire them for insubordination and get someone else. You can't do that when you sub-contract everything to the head of a non-profit.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:06 AM
2

But prostitutes provide a useful service. If prostitution were legal, I probably wouldn't still be a virgin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 08:06 PM
26

So the worst thing for women is to step into traditionally male roles. I thought that that was the opposite of feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 04:31 PM
5

The thing that got to me was the thing about picking on each other being the norm. I have seen women pick on each other and on men as ruthlessly as the men do. It also hurts how he just takes all the criticism of men at face value. No one takes criticism of women at face value. Still, I also need to suppress and counter negative thoughts about being male. Seeing that the posters on Men's Lib also need to do it makes me feel better, because it means that that need didn't come from backing the wro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 05:28 PM
23

Its even dumber when you realize that the premise, that dad's don't put in as much work into the family as moms do, is untrue. https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-myth-of-the-lazy-father
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 02:52 AM
8

On the one hand, about half of misogynistic comments are sent by women, at least according to one study. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/26/half-of-misogynistic-tweets-sent-by-women-study-finds So just assuming that these comments are coming from men isn't really sound. On the other hand, there is academic research indicating that men really do have higher sex drives than women, and that really does slant the bargaining power in a heterosexual relationship towards the woman. http…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 07:46 PM
7

We look to the dude in the theater who cannot seem to sit without an invisible yardstick between his knees as though he were the one who invented dick-and-balls-based insecurity. When you are overweight, and have testicles, that is the most comfortable way to sit. Your testicles and inner-thighs have to go somewhere. The problem with concepts like toxic masculinity and toxic feminity is that they are idealist. They both assert that the ultimate cause of the problem is certain ideas floating arou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 03:23 AM
5

People believe that men have more control over their lives than women do. So if women have a problem more so than men do, then it must because of how society treats them. Whereas with men, if they have a problem more so than women do, it must be because of what men think and do of their own volition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 05:22 PM
3

In particular, destitution is disproportionately associated with men, and is predictively linked to male suicide: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953619307737 That study wasn't looking at the link between destitution and suicide it was looking at the link between food stamps and suicide. Food stamps and destitution are related. But they are not identical. If you believe the U.S. census office, it is women who are more likely to be poor. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 04:49 PM
2

This piece wasn't written as a response to OP. But it does raise some relevant points. https://benjaminstudebaker.com/2019/10/20/im-a-political-theorist-and-i-hate-the-equality-equity-chart/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 01:52 AM
1

That piece makes some good points. Sometimes it isn't possible for everyone to get what they need to flourish. But it is still a good direction to move in, even if we can't always reach it. More importantly, when people argue for equality, they are not always arguing for treating everyone the same for the sake of treating everyone the same. They are usually arguing either for equality of opportunity: i.e., make everyone equally likely to succeed, or for equality of welfare, i.e., make everyone e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 01:50 AM
2

Yeah, they really should be blaming the white people people who discriminate against black people for wearing black hairstyles instead of the white people who get away with wearing those same hairstyles. Imagine trying to argue that white people shouldn't rap or play jazz. Its that level of stupid. That being said, the fact that there are going to be rules doesn't mean that we can't make those rules better, we just need to try and make the rules better with the conscious aim of allowing everyone…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 01:06 AM
1

There are always going to be rules for the sexes. But maybe if we just try, we can create rules that allow everyone to flourish. We don't really want to treat everyone the same just for its own sake, we want everyone to have the tools that they need to be successful. I got the idea from this piece: https://everydayfeminism.com/2014/09/equality-is-not-enough/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/20 11:49 PM
2

tbh, that piece did piss me off back when it was written. Now that I have read it again, She is right about the economy becoming more feminine. The jobs that are at low-risk of automation that are projected to grow are mostly female dominated. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2019/09/11/the-differing-impact-of-automation-on-men-and-womens-work/ However, men still maintain a big edge over women in the work-force, showing up. Women spend more time caring for Children. So men work more over-…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/20 11:47 PM
7

There are other effects on sexual sensitivity as well, especially the dekeratinization of the glands, as studies have shown, but I will save an indepth analysis of this for an expanded post. You really shouldn't be citing singular studies for biomedical information. You need a recent meta-analyses or systematic review to prove anything in the field of medicine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 08:07 PM
4

Two problems here: 1. It is possible to be a victim of abuse, and still know exactly what you are doing when you kill your abuser. So this is basically creating a "he had it coming" defense, something that isn't supposed to exist in common law. 2. Social scientists are not concrete among themselves on how to define and measure coercive control.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178917300940 So using it as a defense is highly questionable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/20 06:23 PM
20

The real problem is the people who complain about "creeps" feel entitled to not interact with people whom they dislike because of surface level characteristics. In a diverse society, that comes with the territory. Its like feeling entitled to not interact with people of other faiths. That is only a realistic expectation for people who live in intentional religious communities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/20 09:18 PM
16

Because women are more likely than men to experience physical and sexual threat in their daily lives, they are also more likely to judge others (usually men) to be creepy. Judgments of creepiness, however, are not necessarily reliable. Not true. https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2018/51/fewer-women-than-men-fall-victim-to-violence https://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf Edit: Like this article said elsewhere, creepiness is less about threat …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/20 09:09 PM
5

What "non-violent" methods is this person talking about? The way of the Hard Chin and Soft Hand from The Boondocks? More importantly, he is basically saying that its ok for a woman to hit a man. But not for a man to hit a woman. That is not how that works, the morality of violence is not a function of the person doing it. You can't violate the rights of others, in this case the right to non-violence, and still claim that right for yourself. Whoever initiates violence places themselves outside mo…
/r/MensRights13/01/20 01:51 AM
10

The problem with that term "Fragile masculinity" is that it is a supposed description of human behavior that carries the assumption that fault lies with the target, that any criticism or negative statement made about men is right and men who dispute it are overly sensitive or defensive. It allows you to de-legitimize criticism of your claims without actually addressing it, and condemn behavior without actually building a case against it. In other words, disagreeing with the common criticisms of …
/r/MensRights12/01/20 04:24 AM
1

Only makes sense if you ignore that women rape men at about the same rate that men rape women, once you take incidences where the victim is "made to penetrate" against their will, and the institutionalized population into account. https://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf
/r/MensRights11/01/20 07:40 PM
4

In my experience, male characters tend to fall into one of three archetypes: 1. The fool: John Falstaff or Homer Simpson. 2. The Superhuman, Edmund Dantes, or Superman, obviously. 3. The Idiot-Savant: The man who is smart when it comes to his work but stupid when it comes to everything else, like Sherlock Holmes. But none of them really have many doubts. The fool isn't smart enough or self-aware enough to have doubts. The Superman has no need for doubts. The Superman makes a beeline to whatever …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 08:11 AM
5

-I’m very egalitarian and don’t like the idea of “men having to pursue women” or men having to be more dominant, but am struggling realizing ill literally be forever alone if I don’t do these things. You don't necessarily need to be more dominant to be romantically successful. But you do need to pursue women. Waiting for them to come to you doesn't work, at least, it didn't work for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 03:52 AM
8

Its true that women have smaller bladders. But that is because they are smaller period. So they need that much less fluid to stay hydrated. So I am not convinced that they just pee more often than us.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:03 PM
27

The argument for this practice that I know of is that women need more time in the bathroom than men, because they menstruate. But that only works if you don't consider transwomen women, or don't count post-menopausal women. It doesn't seem fair that they should get to use whatever bathroom they want when they don't menstruate.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 09:40 PM
17

The week point in this study is using private income a measure of competence. By that standard, men really are more competent than women in general, because of the pay gap. You can't use private income as your measure of competence, and simultaneously say that the group that makes less money is being unjustly discriminated against. Edit: To be more precise, its true that education isn't a good proxy for competence because it correlates with social background. But that is also true of income. So …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/20 07:32 AM
19

Yeah people say that men can't take rejection. But they ignore that people treat men differently when they get rejected than they treat women.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 05:33 AM
5

I don't know about Canada. But in the U.S. there are occupations where the women earn more than the men. https://www.revelist.com/career/average-porn-salaries/851 So this seems like a big oversight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 05:44 PM
3

The obvious thing to do is point to the times that men's rights activists try to fight for men's rights, like by building men's shelters and protesting circumcision, but feminists protest it. Or just point out how when men try to bring up men's issues feminists say "Men have the power in this society. So stop complaining" or something to that effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 04:32 PM
5

The basic idea is that women do more unpaid work than men. So they need to work fewer paid hours so that they have the same amount of free time. Fair enough. But by that same logic, men should retire sooner than women, because men die sooner. We want everyone to have an equal amount of retirement time.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:15 AM
1

So demanding bodily autonomy just means that you have a fragile ego. That is good to know. That will be useful in the abortion discussion.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:27 AM
4

So we have something in common after all.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 05:31 AM
2

It comes down to people perceiving men and male sexuality as violent. So males expressing their sexuality are seen as rapists. Women are not perceived as violent. So women expressing their sexuality is seen as harmless. I think that the basis for this perception is pregnancy, a man expressing his sexuality can get a woman pregnant, thereby impose costs on a her and her family when it comes time to support the child or deal with the shame of getting an abortion (even progressives don't see aborti…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:27 AM
7

I hate people who repeat that "if men got pregnant then there would be no abortion restrictions" meme. Abortion attitudes really don't vary by gender that much. What they vary by is religiosity and age. Go ask older Christian women about abortion. In my experience, they make their disapproval of it very clear.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 06:12 AM
2

The right to equal prison sentences for the same crime, and the right to not register for the draft.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 08:29 PM
39

I have to wear a jacket, because you are cold. You can use the same logic to argue that I can't eat cheese in front of you because you are lactose intolerant.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 08:32 PM
2

If you just look at the past 12 months statistics. The male victimization rate is outside the confidence interval for the female victimization rate. I think that that implies statistical significance.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:18 PM
3

Right here. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf. Its in tables 9 and 11.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:05 PM
0

It is kind of realistic. Women control about 60% of America's wealth. https://thequantum.com/financial-facts-for-womens-history-month/ People need to learn how things really work when they are still kids.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:06 PM
5

Technically, being elected president, or being elected anything isn't a right. You have the right to run for office. But not the right to succeed in acquiring office.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 08:12 PM
1

To be fair, Women are still under-represented in elected office in Europe over all. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/12/11/finlands-new-prime-minister-is-the-worlds-youngest
/r/MensRights19/12/19 04:31 AM
3

Oh, and before you say some shit like "Okay, female-on-male violence may be just as common if not more common than male-on-female violence, but women are still FAR more likely to be seriously injured by DV" yeah no. The gender gap regarding harm and injury isn't nearly as big as you seem to think it is. IIRC there was a study which showed that for every 8 women seriously injured by DV (injured seriously enough to require emergency medical attention), 5 men are. That's not nearly as big a gap as …
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:54 AM
3

Thanks for posting the full PDF. Now to respond to Flood's other statements: The most well-documented determinants of men’s violence against women can be found in gender norms and gender relations. Whether at individual, community, or societal levels, there are relationships between how gender is organised and violence against women. The evidence there is mixed. A review of the international IPV literature found a correlation between measures of gender inequality for university student dating sa…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 11:43 PM
1

So what is your point?
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:11 PM
21

To be clear, hygiene is the same reason that people give for female circumcision in the countries in which it is practiced.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:06 AM
1

The link has expired. Can you post one that is still live?
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:52 PM
1

More like over 100 years. Or its always been that way. Girls have been getting better grades than boys since people started keeping track at all. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-a0036620.pdf
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:09 AM
3

Women generally do better in the education system than men. Women's careers start to fall behind their male equivalents after they leave school and enter the workforce. So saying that holding the men back after school will allow the women to "catch up." doesn't make much sense, because women don't fall behind in terms of their careers until after they leave school.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 08:27 AM
5

So just everyone?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:09 PM
8

Who does this pressure come from? authority figures? peers? males? females? all of the above?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:20 PM
2

Men suffer from disadvantages that are not caused by discrimination against women, like educational disadvantages for instance ( Stoet, Gijsbert; Geary, David C. (2015). "Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality". Intelligence. 48: 137–151. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006. ) When it comes to deciding how a household interacts with itself, it is women who usually hold power. For how this worked historically, see this video by Lindybeige. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/19 07:57 AM
5

There are lots of studies on non-western populations. But most of them only look at female victimization. However, 73 look at victimization for both sexes and find gender symmetry. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236018381_Partner_Abuse_Worldwide
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/19 01:31 AM
1

Maybe. But it doesn't matter. Most of us don't live in our natural habitat. Most of us live in cities. How "natural" can it be to believe that there is no absolute present, like Einstein said? How "natural" is it to believe in private property? How "natural" is it to believe that supply and demand determine commodity prices?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/19 10:42 PM
6

This made me realize something that has been bothering me for years. There is lots of advice on the internet for romantically unsuccessful men. But most of it is some variation of "Change your personality." And I never tried to follow that advice, because I want to be loved as me, not the person who other people think I can or should become. If I was that guy, then I would want different things. Why would anyone follow advice that by its own terms, can't give you what you want, as the person who…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/19 10:26 AM
7

The fact that there are MRAS complaining about being discriminated against by their female bosses clearly shows that some people can perceive women as dominant or oppressive. But what you meant to ask was: can large numbers of people really believe that women are dominant or oppressive. The answer is yes: People can believe in all sorts of things. Large numbers of people can believe that God made the world in 6 days, or that Aliens built the pyramids. You can mainstream pretty much any belief in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/19 08:34 AM
14

But its a woman's right to deny sex to anyone they want.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 07:21 AM
1

I do have a family. They would be sad if I disappeared. I guess what I should have said is that I interpret men being "redundant as a gender" as there not being anything that is true about men that is good, that isn't true about all other genders. In other words, that if men were to all become women, or non-binary, that people would only object because they are androphilic, i.e. straight women and gay men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/19 10:34 PM
6

What is to come out of this new world? “I think women are going to have to abandon the traditional 50-50 everything-must-be-equal feminist mind-set,” Ms. Mundy said, “and learn to value husbands and partners who are becoming more domesticated and supportive.” In other words, economic inequality is fine as long as it benefits women. Part of me wants to know how many people really think that. But the other part of me is afraid to find out. “Women here are doing the same jobs as men,” she said. “Th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 06:57 AM
2

We are humans. What does it mean to be redundant? It means that if we were to magically disappear, then no one else would be inconvenienced. In any case, corporations are happy for us to exist, since they do need labour. Corporations are not "happy" corporations are just legal fictions created for the sake of their owners. Only living creatures experience happiness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 06:48 AM
7

But pensions expert John Ralfe says the money would be far better targeted at those who were hit when the timeframe to equalise the gap was accelerated in 2011 - a far smaller cohort. I am actually fine with this. Women who were led to believe that they would not need to work at 65 won't necessarily be able to adjust their working time and budgets on their own under the new timetable. It would be cruel to just leave them in the lurch. The real issue is here: But over the years it was argued that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 08:44 PM
6

But lowering the retirement age when life expectancy keeps going up is hard to make work actuarially, if its possible at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 08:39 PM
0

We need to spend more years in school To do what exactly? Employers now have a harder time filling jobs that don't require college degrees than filling jobs that do require a college degree. https://www.vox.com/2019/3/18/18270916/labor-shortage-workers-us I mean, Americans are getting more schooling than they ever had before. But education is a consumption good. So that is an increase in our consumption, and therefore an increase in our standard of living, by definition. We are now expected to w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 09:57 PM
1

but one of the reasons why Universal Childcare is probably going to happen regardless whether you or I are correct, is the declining birth rates in the First World, which is a problem. I think that open borders will happen before Universal child care. Its cheaper and simpler from an administrative perspective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 06:48 AM
4

In the 1950s, we needed only one income, one person working 40 hours a week to support a family Now we need two incomes. Both mothers and fathers need to work full time hours, for a lower standard of living. According to whom? Real GDP per-capita is higher than it was in the 1950s. https://www.multpl.com/us-real-gdp-per-capita/table/by-year Think about it, on the Brady Bunch you can see white professionals complaining about the price of butter. When was the last time that happened IRL?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 06:47 AM
3

Well, I think that they are right, in their conclusion. But not all the details, A person's grooming habits and weight are not a reliable measure of their politics, or their morality. So insulting people who disagree with your political or social views by calling them fat or unkempt is wrong, both morally and logically. The thing about autism's heart is in the right place. But I would be remiss, speaking as a person with a disability, if I didn't point out that people with disabilities in genera…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/19 08:53 AM
1

What exactly was the topic of discussion?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:42 AM
4

I have seen feminists talk about paternity leave more than MRAs. But I have seen MRAs talk about male victims of abuse and male suicide rates more. So the MRAs win the caring contest 2 to 1. Even then, when feminists advocate for paternity leave, its usually to free up the women to work more to close the pay gap, so they still treat men as a means to make women's lives better, instead of an end in their own right.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 11:13 PM
-1

I don't like this. Being socially awkward and having no friends isn't a reason to touch someone without their permission. Even if the intent isn't sexual at all, its still a violation of the other person's right to not have their body interfered with. I think that sex offender's registries shouldn't exist at all. So I can't say that I agree with the sentence. But then there is that bit about the "cultural norm" of boys not reaching emotional maturity as fast as girls. The problem with the concep…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 09:18 AM
4

If we are just talking about sexual assault, then that is not true. If you include the prison population and cases where the victim was made to penetrate the attacker against their will, then men and women commit about the same number of rapes. http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/19 01:28 AM
0

Your pity is appreciated.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:55 AM
1

I got directions from Magic Blue Pill.com http://www.magicbluepill.com/hax/peeing.html. But it was just too uncomfortable to pee with a boner while sitting down. My dick points upwards when I am erect. So I had to bend so far forward that my chest was up against the seat. Doing that hurts.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:58 PM
1

Not quite. This was long before anyone tried to give me directions on it. I haven't tried it since.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:06 PM
1

I have tried. I didn't like it. That thing about your dick getting caught on the rim isn't speculation. Its lived experience.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 08:19 PM
1

I don't know about that. If you try to pee while sitting down while your unit is erect, then your unit can get caught by the rim of the seat. That hurts. You don't run that risk if you pee standing up. Also, its just physically easier to pee for me when I am standing up. Its easier to get the stream started, and its easier to empty my bladder. When I try to pee sitting down, I usually have to stand back up to finish anyway.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:08 PM
1

Most of the time yes. But sometimes you have to pee when you are hard.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:44 PM
2

When I pee while sitting down, it gets on my pants. Not every guy can pee straight down.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:28 PM
12

Ok that is true. A male dog can cause more pregnancies in a year than a female dog. But for that same reason, spaying the females is a more efficient way to reduce unwanted pregnancies than neutering the males. You can neuter all but one male, and still get all the female dogs pregnant. If you spay all but one female dog, then only that one female can get pregnant. So putting the emphasis on neutering the male dogs is backwards.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 04:32 AM
22

The fact that they also want you to spay your pets means that they should also be saying "you would sterilize your wife if she slept with everyone in the neighborhood."
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:49 PM
2

Rape being about penetrating someone against their will is how the FBI defines it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape#General. But the FBI is just a law-enforcement agency, they don't get to actually define crimes. If you look at this legal dictionary, penetration isn't required. https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/rape
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:10 AM
2

As for poor media representation, you should check out "The media and male identity." by McNamara. The media frequently depicts women as superior to men in basic humanity. As for reproductive rights, I actually do think that early term abortion should be legal. But, once the fetus has the ability to experience pain, then it has some sort of moral status. So its hard to argue that ending its life is a valid right.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 11:52 PM
1

The stats from the NCVS only go up to 2009. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/wv09.pdf. However, a clear trend of convergence is happening for that time period. So it could be that men are no longer more likely to be victims of workplace violence. Also, most work-place homicide victims are now women. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0015.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 07:15 PM
2

Men tend to experience more work-place violence: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vw99.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 06:22 PM
10

If we go by the Department of Housing's most recent report, and the U.S. census bureau's quick facts, then males are 60.2% of the homeless, and 49.2% of the population. So males are over-represented among the homeless population. Someone on r/againstmensrights argued that we need to account that children can be homeless when we talk about whether adult men are over-represented among the homeless population. And that is true. If you assume that the genders are equally represented across all age g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 07:09 AM
13

For male violence to keep women in check, women need to actually be in check in the first place. That is not the case. In ancient times, men made the big and prestigious decisions, but women made the decisions that mattered to most people in most cases. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPmbDPsyt6I&t=54s). Its mostly still that way. Most heads of state and corporations are men. But most household level decisions are made by women, (The Boy Crisis by Warren Farrel). And they make most purchasing d…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:14 AM
1

as fighting in could could anger the judge and lead to a worse situation. Has that ever actually happened?
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:44 PM
56

Lawyers are supposed to be zealous advocates for their clients. This might be malpractice.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:22 AM
79

Women graduate college at higher rates than men, and that is especially true of women of color. So this is backwards.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:05 PM
19

The majority of women who use some form of violence towards their partner have been subjected to (worse) violence by that man before, or on the same occasion. I don't think that that is true. Having been the victim of domestic violence in the past is not a greater predictor of committing violence for women than it is for men. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307612278_Gender_Differences_in_Risk_Markers_for_Perpetration_of_Physical_Partner_Violence_Results_from_a_Meta-Analytic_Review ​ If…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:17 PM
1

I can't make out most of your teachers handwriting. But I could make out the essay not being about the urban environment. It is an urban sociology class. So if it only plays into the "sociology" part and not the "urban" part, then you shouldn't expect a passing grade.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:49 PM
3

Some problems here: the report argues that men get more benefit from marriage than women. Older studies found that. But more recent data indicates that that is not the case. (“Do Men Really Benefit More From Marriage Than Women?” Lisa Strohschein, Am J Public Health. 2016 September; 106(9): e2. Published online 2016 September. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303308) ​ They argue that men traditionally get power from dominance over women and children. That isn't entirely true. In traditional societies, th…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:51 PM
-2

But how is this related to men's position in society? How exactly does any of this affect men differently than it affects anyone else?
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:02 AM
1

Interesting piece. But how is this a Men's Rights issue? The decision of whether to go to university, trade school, or straight to the workforce applies to women too.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:53 AM
4

Hiding your actual positions just feels dishonest. And listing your sources whenever you can makes you look conscientious and well read. So I think that some of this is bad advice. More importantly, "debating" is not as useful as people think. If someone really did arrive at their position by honest investigation or their own lived experiences, then talking to internet strangers isn't going to change their minds most of the time.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 12:53 PM
58

There is evidence that men are discriminated against in the criminal justice system. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx And the education system. https://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier-1.pdf. And the medical system. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/ . So that book needs to be updated.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:33 AM
5

Men tend to drink and smoke more than women. But the gap in alcohol consumption is narrowing in younger generations. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/10/e011827 https://www.princeton.edu/~accase/downloads/Sex_Differences_in_Morbidity_and_Mortality.pdf Doctors tend to spend less time with men and give them less advice. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/ Testosterone suppresses the immune system. So infectious diseases have more severe effects on men than one women.https://www.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 06:33 AM
2

I would be interested to see the rationale for those guidelines. I am having a very hard time seeing what ethical standard requires the genders to be equal with rewards (pay discrimination is illegal) but not punishments. I have seen people argue that prison is more harmful to women than it is to men. But I am not convinced. I know that women are more likely to get raped in prison. But men are more likely to commit suicide in prison. So it isn't clear who prison is more harmful to one sex than t…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:20 AM
3

I'm not saying it's entirely right but my point is that TM does include negative effects on men. I didn't say that it doesn't. I just always interpreted it as negative effects, specifically associated with masculinity ideology. If it was a negative effect that originated in say, lead poisoning, or abusive parenting, or genetics, then it wouldn't necessarily count as part of toxic masculinity. ​ My problem isn't really that they don't count "women" as part of society. The problem is the concepts …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 11:21 PM
1

Tbf toxic masculinity includes self destructive behaviors. Where did you see that? What I have seen says that it is defined by 4 specific norms: dominance, self-reliance, playboy, and homophobia. Not self-destructive behaviors in general. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229242506_Evaluation_of_the_Factor_Structure_and_Construct_Validity_of_Scores_on_the_Male_Role_Norms_Inventory-Revised_MRNI-R The biggest problem with the toxic masculinity argument is that it is always presented as some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 09:01 PM
11

The academic research that I can find says that it is men who are less likely to report being victims of domestic violence to the police when it happens. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/209039.pdf So if you are sticking with the premise that women are less likely to report being the victim of domestic violence when it happens, then I think that the burden of proof is on you. You can find the published version of that paper here: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00156.x
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 12:01 PM
8

I got it from this piece: https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2018/51/fewer-women-than-men-fall-victim-to-violence And this piece: https://nortonbooks.typepad.com/everydaysociology/2009/05/who-is-most-likely-to-be-a-crime-victim.html And The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrel, that men are more likely to be victims of violence than women are. There are sources to the contrary: https://globalnews.ca/news/1221021/women-more-likely-to-be-victims-of-violent-crimes-study/ And https://www.bjs.gov/content/p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 10:33 AM
6

Well if the FBI is part of this, then it probably isn't just a publicity stunt. Now that I think about it, The Joker is supposed to symbolize whatever it is that society fears at the time: When people fear serial killers, he is a serial killer. When people fear organized crime, he is a gangster. When people fear terrorism, he is a terrorist. So if people are legitimately scared that this movie will inspire real life spree killers, then that just means that the promoters of this film have done th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 06:45 AM
13

I have only ever seen people get mad at it on Twitter, and the criticisms don't seem especially accurate. They said that the character embodies toxic masculinity, but we don't see him being misogynistic, homophobic, or bent on self-reliance in the trailers. I have heard people say that its about a white man going nuts from going through what women go through every day. But actually being a victim of direct violence, like when he got hit in the head with a sign, mostly happens to men. I honestly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 02:09 AM
145

Refusing to house single men in homeless shelters doesn't make them go away. It just makes them continue to live on the streets. Living on the streets doesn't make them any less likely to victimize others. What exactly they think they are accomplishing, I don't know.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 05:28 AM
3

I have no consideration for those who see me as a threat, based on who I am. My consideration is reserved for those who are interested in interacting with me as a person, not some wild animal to be avoided.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 11:44 PM
4

The problem I have with the concept of toxic masculinity is that it is idealist: It attributes men's problems to certain ideas floating around in the zietgiest, or certain adverse behaviors on the part of men themselves. The behavior of human beings, like every other organism, is logically dependent on its environment. So I want to see a movie where every character's motivations, problems, and actions stem directly from some influence in their physical environment. I want to see stories where al…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 05:13 AM
1

Two problems I can see with that: 1. The paper I cited was talking about France in the 1970s. What war were Frenchmen fighting and dying in then? 2. The way you said it, individual male violence should correlate with international warfare. that is not the case. Israel has been at war non-stop since its founding. But they don't have as high a homicide rate as The Bahamas, who only ever went to war with Cuba once since they gained independence, and that war lasted for less than a year.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/19 09:32 PM
1

In other words, I believe men are less needed in kin corporate modes of production, which on its own fueled men's search for power. That is my absolutely personal and unsupported hypothesis. Interesting. But it can't explain societies like French Peasantry, that are both corporatized and reportedly lacking in male dominance. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1525/ae.1975.2.4.02a00090
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:40 PM
2

I don't know. I am not a historian. I only know about the mongol queens because I read Weatherford's book about Genghis Khan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 06:57 PM
2

You have certainly given me something to think about, especially regarding reverse dominance and insulting the meat. But I am more interested in the claim that even in hunter-gatherer societies, the ones who have power are usually the men. The article touched on that. But it didn't really lay out the evidence that it is true, or give the reason why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 06:49 PM
2

But sometimes happens that someone tries to boast about being better than the others, and people just don't have it. That makes more sense. But why would males be the ones more likely to do the boasting?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 05:48 PM
1

Yes, in the literature, those who would have power are usually considered to be men and they are usually trying to gain legitimacy through hunting. By forcing them to share, they are unable to accumulate power that way. What makes you think that the function of hunting is legitimacy? I thought that hunting emerged because before we invented agriculture hunting was the only way to get enough nutrients to support a human brain. Also, what makes you think that the sharing is forced? We are talking …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 05:45 AM
1

That is, clans that descend from older brothers have more power than clans descended from younger brothers. There is one ruling clan who dominates all other clans. Usually inequalities between men and women are much higher (think like Ghenghis Khan like). The ruler or chief has great control over all other men and women in the chiefdom. The sources that I know of differ in their depiction of Genghis Khan's society. There is a book by Jack Weather ford that says that the women of the Khan househo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 05:36 AM
4

The obvious response there is that, like African Americans, men are also more likely to be shot to death by the police, be homeless, and get longer prison sentences for the same crime, than other groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/19 10:02 PM
3

The saddest part is the dad defending the babysitter by insisting that the son is "sex mad." That is basic victim blaming.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:25 PM
1

We need to remember that this study was based on Pimbwe, were either partner is free to leave the marriage at any time. So this might not apply in societies where dissolving a marriage is harder.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:37 AM
1

I would say that it isn't valid. The CTS was never intended to measure motives or context behind spousal abuse by women, or anyone else. (More Than a Literature Review: The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Articles and Online Database John Hamel, LCSW). Women and men generally have the same motives for spousal abuse, the idea that women are just reacting to violence by men doesn't enjoy much empirical support. (Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/19 10:24 AM
2

" Umoja, which means "unity" in Swahili, is quite literally a no man's land, and the matriarchal refuge is now home to the Samburu women who no longer want to suffer abuses, like genital mutilation and forced marriages, at the hands of men. " I thought that female genital mutilation was usually performed by elderly women. https://www.unfpa.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-frequently-asked-questions#who_performs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/19 03:01 AM
10

“Economic stability is a key to a stable family life — to getting married, staying married, and marrying well,” he says. “Physical attractiveness may provide an initial filter that draws our attention, but economic considerations and shared values matter much more in the long term. A good job attracts and retains suitable marital partners. And this is true for both men and women.” ​ And, while there is still a gender pay gap, as more women become financially independent, that may help shift thin…
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:15 PM
1

I don't think that women are easier to manipulate than men. I think its just that more women than men vote in every election, and men and women both like women better than men. So women are the constituency that you want between the two of them.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:32 AM
1

Where and when did they retract that claim?
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:10 AM
1

Yes. https://arkofhopeforchildren.org/child-trafficking/child-trafficking-statistics
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/19 08:47 PM
1

Those aren't sciences. But you are essentially correct: they do feed into our institutions. But I'd argue this has far more to do with a sort of "will to power" than any special faculty for those roles. The school/background has fairly little to do with it, and in fact may actually create an artificial barrier. Why would people in the behavioral sciences have more of a will to power than anyone else? How does school create an artificial barrier to it? This is a rather simplistic look at the numb…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 09:18 PM
1

Objection your honor. Relevance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 08:58 PM
1

Personally, I think its that higher education requires you to delay getting married and starting a family. But it doesn't reduce your sex drive. So Highly educated people tend to be socially liberal. On the other hand, if you get married straight out of high school, then you don't want a bunch of promiscuous people running around, because that raises the odds that you will get cucked. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201004/atheistic-liberals-are-smarter-fu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 08:57 PM
5

I think that you are undervaluing the female dominated fields. The social and behavioral sciences along with the humanities directly feed into our politics and therefore, into our institutions. So they have value to anyone who cares about current politics. Also, men who are less educated tend to vote for right-wing parties. So if you are a leftist, guys not getting degrees is a problem for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 06:22 AM
29

The toxic masculinity part is really confusing to me. None of the trailers show the character being stoic or negative towards sexual minorities or women. The white privilege thing doesn't make much sense either. White people are under-represented in pretty much all categories of crime except for hate crimes. We don't see any obvious hate crimes in any of these trailers.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 11:43 AM
3

The basic concept behind all restorative justice is making the victim whole. Its all ready the standard that we apply in tort law. The reason we don't apply it all the time is that those who break the law are frequently too poor to pay damages. So I was thinking that we would re-work the legal system so that it is all like tort-law, with the condition that those who are too poor to pay monetary damages pay in-kind damages, usually with labor towards repairing the damages done to the victim and t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/19 10:17 AM
1

Ok that is a fair point. I was thinking that low recidivism rates mean that they aren't really evil, just in some crazy one off situation that will never occur again. But you could just as easily argue that low recidivism means that the prison system is working on those people. That being said, saying that once people turn evil, incarceration is the only option is still kind of circular. The entire point of prison abolition is that incarceration is never your only option.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/19 10:11 AM
1

We need to remember that the subjects in this study knew that they were part of a scientific study. So they might not be acting the same way they would in a real hiring situation. https://www.smh.com.au/public-service/a-better-way-for-beta-to-test-blind-recruitment-ditch-the-pretend-studies-20170702-gx374v.html
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:58 AM
1

How exactly does any of this lead to having to pay lawyers with cash?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:37 AM
1

That isn't true. The worst offenders, the murderers and rapists, actually have the lowest recidivism rate. The ones with the high re-offense rates are property, drug, and public order law violators. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/19 01:07 AM
2

Doesn't really matter, now that the wheel is up and spinning. Ok, that is a fair point. Positive feedback loops do exist. But only 8% of prisoners are in private prisons. Most of the economic benefits of incarceration go to employees and contractors of state run prisons, not private prisons. So private prisons don't help. But they are not the root cause of mass incarceration. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2015/10/07/private_prisons_parasite/ > Where does it say that? ​ Sorry. I have been get…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/19 01:04 AM
1

It's a circle. More private prisons lead to more lobbying for harsh sentences, which leads to more private prisons, which... But which came first? that is still how you decide which one is ultimately the cause and which one the effect. This is simply not true. And even if it were, the violent ones deserve prison, no matter how small or great their numbers. If you can't get even this basic fact right, it's time to go back to the drawing board... https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/19 12:19 AM
0

Isn't that circular?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 11:23 PM
1

No. The people who own the prisons actually lobby to make laws harsher and penalties longer. Why wouldn't they? That way they get more inmates and for longer. They do that. Yet the proliferation of private prisons happened after mass incarceration, not before. Effect cannot precede cause, unless you are talking about time dilation from super massive objects. As for abolishing prisons, that's going too far. Abolishing prison sentences for non-violent crimes, that seems much wiser. Home detention …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 11:22 PM
1

People don't become dangerous predators for no reason. They become dangerous predators due to things like poverty, lead poisoning, and like someone else pointed out damaged families. So do we just wait for them to become dangerous? Or do we try to nip the problem in the bud?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 06:11 PM
-3

Women are 51% of the population. So them controlling 51% of the wealth isn't a disparity at all. That being said, if the 60% figure is closer to the truth, then it is a legitimate disparity. Also, if you include unpaid work, women still work more than men. https://www.statista.com/chart/13940/women-work-more-than-men/ That being said, married men with children work more than their wives, and they are the sub-set of men who the costs associated with divorce apply to. https://ifstudies.org/blog/th…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:43 AM
2

That doesn't help, at all.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:51 AM
1

These are both good, if imperfect, points to raise, but neither of them seems to grasp that a good point coming out of the wrong mouth doesn’t count for squat. I don't agree at all. What is said is always more important than who says it. Also, Joe Rogan is not MRA at all. " He knows that he is privileged by virtue of his gender and his skin color, but in his heart he is sick of being reminded about it." When it comes to men and their place in the world, he is a luke-warm centrist.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:48 AM
1

How do you mean?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:18 AM
0

The source for this theory is "The Myth of Culture" by Nigel Barber. https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Culture-Genuine-Natural-Societies/dp/184718619X The mechanism that he proposed for this working wasn't that there simply isn't anything to fight over when there is a shortage of women. He said it was that a shortage of women led to women selecting for long-term mates, which made violent tendencies less desirable to them in mates, which made men less likely to do violence. But he never actually said w…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:05 PM
1

I said shortage of marriagable men. That article doesn't contradict what I said at all. It just means that back then, only a minority of men were marriagable. Note that society was more violent back when agriculture was first invented also.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:01 PM
2

Objection your honor. Relevance?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 11:13 AM
2

I am a virgin. So I don't know. But most people give the exact opposite advice when it comes to women and humor, that girls like funny guys. It shows intelligence and creativity.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:44 AM
-3

She isn't right at all. Actual mating markets work in the complete opposite way. Polygamy really only happens when there is a shortage of marriageable men. When it does happen, society becomes more violent and less happy because men start competing with each other for short-term relationships through violence. When the opposite happens, and there is a surplus of marriagable men, male violence disappears because there is nothing left to fight over. So if you want to reduce male violence, then you…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:22 AM
8

I feel like there is a conflation going on here. There are two sets of lawsuits, the suits against the universities for violating due process, and the suits against the accusers for defamation. They don't have the same consequences if successful. Edit: in other words, you can be in favor of one but against the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/19 05:00 AM
1

The famous person defense squad doesn't discriminate. They deny and minimize allegations of sexual assault whether the person being accused is male or female. Also, people go public with sexual assault years later all the time. Remember Bill Cosby?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:47 AM
1

Could you elaborate please?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/19 09:10 AM
1

The problem with attributing human behavior, or lack thereof, to stereotypes is simultaneity. You have to ask: are heterosexual men avoiding these pro-environment behavior because they are associated with women and homosexuals? or are these pro-environment behaviors associated with women and homosexuals because heterosexual men are less likely to do them? There doesn't seem to be a good way to answer that question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/19 08:15 PM
2

Just like to point out that hate crimes are pretty much the only category that white people are over-represented in. But blacks are also over-represented there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States#Crime_statistics So even if we are being generous, she is only 1/5.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 06:56 AM
1

The premise isn't even true. African American men are the ones who are over-represented among shooters. White guys are just the ones you see because white people are the majority. https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-black-americans-commit-crime https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/10/what-the-white-mass-shooter-myth-gets-right-and-wrong-about-killers-demographics.html Edit: Also, most mass shootings are not ideological. Most of them are caused by the same factors as regular hom…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 08:37 PM
1

I got that stuff about women being more prone to depression from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#Mental_health
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:28 PM
12

Women also have access to guns. So the pivot at the end to weapons access makes no sense. Its true that men and women have the same rates of serious mental illness. But the kinds of illness are different. Women are more prone to depression. Men are more prone to substance abuse. So it isn't an entirely fair comparison. More directly, we know that mental illness correlates with mass killings. https://www.wsj.com/articles/mental-illness-and-mass-murder-11564955203
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:35 AM
2

Because with most people on the internet, I don't know their sexual history or current relationship status. That is the nature of anonymous and semi-anonymous forums.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 08:19 PM
1

Yeah. But the people I know in person who use the term "degeneracy" tend to be married men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 07:51 PM
3

Its true that most customs serve multiple purposes. But its also irrelevant. The other purposes of male circumcision and female circumcision seem to be the same: health, cleanliness, and religion. https://theconversation.com/unconstitutional-us-anti-fgm-law-exposes-hypocrisy-in-child-protection-109305 ​ Edit: Its possible that female circumcision is more effective at controlling female sexuality and male circumcision more effective at cleanliness. But I don't know of any literature that actually…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 05:26 PM
3

I have no idea how large the effect is. But does it matter? The issue isn't so much how big the effect is as what purpose it serves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 05:18 PM
2

The decisive factor isn't age, its being in a monogamous relationship. I know lots of guys who go on about "degeneracy." But I don't know that they are single or in a non-monogamous relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 04:42 PM
4

It doesn't ensure that we know who put their member in her. It just reduces the efficiency of sperm insemination generally. So it reduces the odds that if you sleep with someone else's wife, she gets pregnant with your kid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 04:39 PM
3

The guys who claim to hate degeneracy are just advancing their own sexual interests. But not in the way that this guy seems to think. The people who claim to hate "degeneracy" are not so much sexually frustrated men as they are married men. Having a bunch of promiscuous men running around isn't good for married guys because it reduces the odds that the children they raise are actually their own. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201004/atheistic-liberals-are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 03:09 AM
4

Its true that clitoridectomy is an attempt to control female sexual behavior. But male circumcision is a way of controling male sexual behavior for the same reason: to ensure paternity certainty. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Male-genital-mutilation%3A-an-adaptation-to-sexual-Wilson/22715e06ac62d7c1c09a458cf6a615739bcee6b9 ​ So the two practices are morally equivalent in a meaningful sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 03:04 AM
1

Good paper. But what makes male dominance less "mythical" in modern society than in peasant society? What makes male dominance more probable in industrialization than the alternatives? I suspect that what she is arguing is that industrialization increases the economic and social importance of activities outside the home, along with the importance of formal legal rights, which are traditionally dominated by men. But it also tends to increase the participation of women in activities outside the ho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/19 08:49 PM
2

But why is that unfortunate?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:28 PM
2

Why unfortunately?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:25 PM
16

The sad thing is that this is from guys dying in their 20s and 30s rather than just guys not lasting as long after retirement age. That means they are dying before their kids are raised.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 06:54 PM
83

That article says that if you include bonuses and money from FIFA, the men still make more.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 08:17 AM
8

This isn't rocket science. When you are overweight, your thighs get big. When you thighs get big, and your gonads are between your legs, sitting with your legs together is physically painful. They are basically saying "If you are fat, and have testicles, then you better not count on sitting comfortably in public." I know that it means less space for others. But the solution for that is to actually make public seating big enough to accommodate all body types.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 11:29 AM
1

This isn't really a "rights" issue. But still, I see where you are coming from. Guys like that do exist, its just that they are in super-high demand. So the competition is fierce. Not everyone can graduate from Harvard Law School or pitch for the Yankees.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:44 AM
1

You no how no one ever talks about doing this to female prison guards who fuck under-aged male prisoners in Juvenile hall? You could argue that that is because they are prisoners so they must have done something wrong themselves. But they also never talk about doing this to female teachers who have sex with their students. You could argue that its really about preventing unwanted pregnancies and protecting the marriage value of young females. But that can't explain why basically everyone freaks …
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:30 AM
3

This is why there needs to be a law that university investigations into accusations of sexual assault need to guarantee the respondent the right to confront and cross-examine their accuser. I know that some people think that allowing a rapist to cross examine their victim would re-traumatize their victim. But that is why you have a third party like a lawyer do the cross-examination on behalf of the respondent.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:53 AM
3

I signed it. But internet petitions are not the most effective form of activism. They come around too often and they are too easy to fake. We should be sending emails to our representatives in Congress.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:02 AM
3

Is arguing during recess even officially against school policy? Because if it isn't, then this is extra questionable. Edit: Also, is there any evidence from any branch of the social sciences that school children arguing during recess is associated with anything bad?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:20 AM
2

This is good news. Now they can't depict men as murders, rapists, privileged, chauvinistic, or oblivious anymore.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 10:18 PM
1

I don't understand. Can you rephrase that point?
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:07 PM
2

no. That counts as part of her physical form.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:40 PM
26

I’ve pondered once or twice before the prospect of being with someone that took a vested interest in the way I feel or think, but it’s not enough to make me want to be apart from her. I love her and I can only hope that she will one day take an interest in what made me who I am. What exactly do you love about her? Aside from her physical form.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:33 AM
45

Try again. If she keeps turning the topic back towards her, then you probably need a new girlfriend. There is no happy ending to dating a narcissist. That being said, don't think that your girlfriend is the only one that you can open up to. Try regular friends of either sex, and therapists and support groups. You won't know if someone is good for emotional support until after you try.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:18 AM
3

" Moreover, when it comes to sexual offences, rounded off to the nearest whole number, women constitute 0% of all offenders – that’s right, zero. The crimes they most commonly commit are drug and property offences. Thus, in the US, approximately 30% of female prisoners are incarcerated for property offences, and a further 26% for drug offences. The percentages for these offences are 26% and 17%, respectively, in Australia. " That isn't true. When you take the military, the homeless, and the inca…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:50 AM
2

I understand your urge to intervene: What she did is not just immoral but also in contravention of her employer’s mission. You might worry that her failure to respect the reproductive autonomy of her husband derives from a generalized contempt for the reproductive autonomy of others. But there’s a significant body of research in social psychology suggesting that our conduct in one type of situation often doesn’t generalize to others. You can be an honest broker and a dishonest husband. That some…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 06:42 PM
5

we might support them in their well-being, while recognizing that men certainly hold privilege and power in sociopolitical fields and economically. Not entirely true. There are more men at the top of the food chain than women. But there are also more men at the bottom of the food chain. Women tend to cluster towards the middle for whatever reason. https://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Marriage-Fatherhood-ebook/dp/B00OFK22Y8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3DN7GTVDU7C4I&keywords=men+on+strike&qid=15560056…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:49 AM
35

This way of thinking only makes sense if you ignore what child support is for. Its for supporting the child. Its in the name. Whether the kid is with their mom, dad, or someone completely different is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:30 AM
24

Asking about women's bodily insecurities is toxic. Asking about men's bodily insecurities is kosher. Got it.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 09:31 PM
8

Your third source was just quoting your first source. That is double counting. But lets get to debunking these: 1. We know that female rulers were more likely to go to war than their male equivalents historically. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337 You can say that this is because they were "masculinized" from sitting atop male hiearchies and being surrounded by male influences. But that is circular. Yes, most Darwin award winners are men. But I chalk that up to the greater male variability hypo…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:30 PM
2

In Britain and Germany most boys aren't circumcised. At least if Wikipedia is right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision#Less_than_20%_4
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:27 AM
5

In Europe they don't circumcise their boys. They don't have any problems keeping male nursing home residents dick infection free.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:36 AM
2

>Rape. Not True. http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf ​ >Domestic Violence. If you look at only the most severe incididents, then probably. But if you look at all incidents, then no. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178911000620 ​ The root problem with this way of thinking is that it is idealist. They think that the problem is that men think certain things. So the solution is to teach them to think different thing…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 02:21 AM
1

The problem with this way of thinking is that it explains human behavior with more human behavior. The things that people do matter. But what people do depends on the circumstances they find themselves in, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 03:43 PM
2

The problem with this way of thinking is that it explains human behavior with more human behavior. The thinking goes "The problem is that boys and men are trained or encouraged to do certain things. So the solution is to train and encourage them to do different things." The things that people train and encourage each other to do matter. But what people encourage each other to do is dependent on the environment they occupy, not the other way around. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/download/samp…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:29 PM
1

No. Then again, I moved to a new country for work reasons about 6 months after I got into this. So I don't really hang out with the people who knew me before I went MRA anymore for a completely different reason.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:32 PM
1

Disparity in general: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205349 ​ Disparity in life expectancy: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/381472 ​ Disparity in criminal justice sentencing: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=bjcl ​ Sexual Assault: http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf ​ Disparities in scholastic achievement: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:53 AM
1

It makes sense, until you remember that women control most consumer spending. (The Myth of Male Power).
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:39 PM
1

Circumcision isn't done to increase sexual pleasure. Its done to reduce paternity uncertainty. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2271/5e06ac62d7c1c09a458cf6a615739bcee6b9.pdf
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:47 PM
1

Sometimes women do hold political and economic power, like how they outvote men in every election. Or how they control most consumer spending.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:41 AM
2

Which page is this on? The stuff I can find in the national data indicates that most people report being victimized by men, not women. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:47 PM
1

I don't know. Do you know where to find it?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:36 PM
5

The worst part is that, if you count the assaults that take place in prison, women and men commit rape at about the same rate. http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:29 AM
3

The same penalties that they use to get men to sign up. They seem to work. I especially love that word "pedantic" good way of minimizing it.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 09:15 PM
2

If we want to ever kill off that self-destructive vision of masculinity, the onus is on the men to show the boys that real men are ok with seeking help. I think that assigning the blame to visions or ideas will ultimately be fruitless. The things that people think matter. But what people think is logically dependent on the physical world they inhabit, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 02:20 PM
3

It probably isn't intentionally discriminatory. But I really don't know.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:47 AM
3

I can't remember where I read this. But therapy actually isn't as effective on men as it is on women. The issue isn't not being able to find a therapist. Its not being able to get the benefits of therapy.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:21 AM
61

But they place the blame on men refusing to seek help, instead of mental health services not serving their needs. If half the population won't use your services, do you blame half the population, or the way the services are provided and marketed?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:03 PM
10

So when are they gonna outlaw vibrators? Those are basically primitive sex robots for ladies.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:05 PM
2

I made a pretty subtle comment there about double standards What was it exactly?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:08 PM
-3

First, I actually do believe in the pay gap. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap_in_the_United_States#Direct_discrimination But women don't suffer from more violence over all than men https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdf (page 11). Men actually do have a tendency to hate and fear women. But that is because of paternity uncertainty. The hatred towards loose women comes from how they make it hard for men to know that the kids they are raising are actually their own. Women are kept…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:31 PM
2

What is really messed up about this is that male role strain has been documented at least since 2003 by academics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447828/ The thing I like to bust out when people talk about male entitlement or male privilege is this paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205349
/r/MensRights14/02/19 02:45 PM
2

To be fair, they should also have an emoji for making fun of girls with big vaginal lips.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:28 PM
1

To be fair, women actually are more reluctant to leave their homes in the face of domestic abuse than men are. https://www.persee.fr/doc/pop_0032-4663_2000_hos_12_1_7089. But most homeless women have young children in their custody https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8243048. So I don't buy that having to take care of Children is what stops women from leaving abusive homes and becoming homeless. Especially not with women with Children being less likely to be poor than lone men after you account …
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:36 PM
2

Even if they only count sexually active students, you still have the same problem. Every time a man has sex with a new woman, a woman has sex with a new man. So, the total number of partners still has to be equal.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:21 PM
2

Even if you think that male college students are having more sex with people from off campus than female college students, I can't actually find the survey from the CDC she cited, and the one survey I could find gave completely different figures. https://collegestats.org/explore/collegiate-sexual-exposure/ So tbh, I just think that the CDC didn't actually say what she says it said.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:19 PM
6

Possible, but not very likely. With women being the majority of college students there is no reason for straight men to look off campus for partners. In fact, the incentive is the other way, for straight college women to look off-campus for men. Edit: Even if college men are having sex with more people from off campus than college women. So what? The ad said "wonder what that woman gave you?" Not "Wonder what that female college student gave you."
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:52 PM
7

Yes they are. Adding in low status males doesn't change the fact that every time a man has sex with a new woman, a woman has sex with a new man.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:51 PM
27

Just like to point out that heterosexual men having more partners than heterosexual women is mathematically impossible. http://archive.li/C41rG
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:46 PM
6

To avoid committing the slippery slope fallacy you have to actually explain what makes the slope slippery.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:59 AM
8

This "intersectional escape," the phenomenon by which older women seem to escape age-based penalties, is actually rooted in sexism. Younger employees perceive older women as less of a threat to their own careers. They're also more likely to view older, dominant women as maternal or caring, even if they behave in an assertive way. But these same employees instead see older men as overly aggressive and hostile to younger workers' success. So people think of old men differently than they think of o…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:46 PM
1

I think that she got most of the pension because He got the house.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:18 PM
2

Not even true if you include being forced to penetrate against your will and include the institutionalized population. http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Faculty/bibs/stemple/Stemple-SexualVictimizationPerpetratedFinal.pdf
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:41 AM
1

What is your source for the number of hours worked by men and women?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:48 AM
2

Since she actually is a Doctor, she is in a better position to advocate against circumcision than most people. Since Doctors are the ones who profit from it. Why wouldn't someone be damaged from a medically unnecessary surgery that alters how your genitals look and feel?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:29 PM
6

There are four major differences between male and female offenders. First, women are much less likely to reoffend than men. Their recidivism levels are at least 10% lower in both the US and Australia. But prison itself increases the rate of recidivism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256919604_Gender_differences_in_the_effects_of_prison_on_recidivism. Men are more likely to be incarcerated than women in the first place.https://www.prisonpolicy.org/graphs/genderinc.html This guy is confu…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:24 PM
0

I see the logic in that. All other things remaining equal the person you want chopping down a wooden door with a fire ax to get to you, or dragging your unconscious body out of a burning building, is the person with the most upper-body strength. But being over-weight tends to interfere with a fire-fighters ability to perform their duties for the same reasons it interferes with all strenuous physical activity. https://www.fireengineering.com/articles/print/volume-165/issue-12/features/physical-fi…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:27 PM
6

No Harvard Biz review is right. There isn't any reason for whites and males to be over-represented among fire-fighters. One of the reasons this movement exists is that we want the risk associated with being a first-responder to be shared by everyone equally. (source: Myth of Male Power).
/r/MensRights22/12/18 05:26 PM
2

She isn't wrong. But no one is as smart as they think they are. So why direct it at men?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:06 AM
25

r/mensrights has way more subscribers than r/againstmensrights and its been around for 3 years longer. So this makes no sense.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:44 PM
5

Something else they got set up yesterday was an "Inequality Bakesale." In this bakesale, the males had to pay more for the same goods as the girls, I don't have the exact numbers for everything they sold, but for example, guys had to pay 70 cents for a muffin, and girls 50 cents. They said they did this to know what it's like to have to pay more (proportionally). Biggest problem is this one, since women actually control most consumer spending. They make less money, but they spend more of other p…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:07 PM
11

I tried to talk to my parents about this. It went terribly. I couldn't bring myself to open up about my own feelings. So I kept just repeating other people's arguments about it. My dad kept trying to change the subject. My mom just said that the doctor told her that "Boys like to look like their dad ( in terms of penis)." Just realized that that makes no sense. Guys don't routinely compare dicks with their dads.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 07:22 AM
3

Men and women suffer violent crime at about the same rate. So what are they afraid of that we are not? https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv16.pdf
/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:47 AM
2

This is from the 2000 issue. This is old news.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:56 AM
2

This is from 2016. I mean its good news. But its old news.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:40 AM
45

"Shocking or highly offensive" according to whom? And the stuff on men and masculinity that they want us to look at is all about men wronging others. Not the problems that men face. Why do they keep trying to reduce the salience of what we care about?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:21 AM
11

But if rape is caused by negative attitudes towards women, then why do men and women experience non consensual sex at the same rate? https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:05 AM
1

No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:30 AM
1

If you provide a service, in this case healthcare, and half the population is less willing to use it than the other half, is something wrong with half the population? Or is something wrong with the service?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:21 PM
1

Where did you hear that?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 10:10 AM
6

There is a female birth control pill. But not a male birth control pill. So really its the woman who is in the best position to prevent pregnancy. So putting all the responsibility of preventing it on the male makes no sense. The point is that the phrase "irresponsible ejaculations" begs the question.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:37 AM
7

"16. Be responsible with money in domestic/romantic relationships. Know that if you are irresponsible with money, this necessarily impacts your partner and since women still make less than men overall (and live longer), this is a feminist issue." Why are they talking about living longer like its a disadvantage? When we look at racial differences, we consider it an advantage. especially since men die sooner than women for some of the same reasons that blacks die sooner than whites: more likely to…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 08:54 AM
11

"4. Give women space." If you exclude homicide, there is no statistically significant difference in the rate at which men and women experience violence. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6166. Most victims of homicide are male. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender. So I am confident in saying that men are actually more likely to be a victim of inter-personal violence than women. So why are women so afraid of violence?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 08:49 AM
3

What I just said was a good snappy come back. But the real problem with this kind of thinking is that it stacks the deck. It takes into account the unpaid labor that women do, but not the unpaid labor that men do: mowing the lawn, washing the car, being a free body-guard.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:09 AM
5

Men all ready give their money to women. Men usually pay for dates. Most consumer spending is controlled by women. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/u-s--women-control-the-purse-strings.html
/r/MensRights11/09/18 08:52 PM
4

"trust" was a poor choice of words. What I should have said, is that if you have such a low opinion of me that my very presence in a public place is inconvenient, why should I respect your fears?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:10 PM
10

You would only ask someone to not be on the same side of the street if you don't trust them to not attack you. You can't deny trust and ask them to trust you on your fear and its validity.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:05 AM
10

The problem here is the idea that being in positions of power over others is what drives anti-social behavior. If that were the case, then it would be very confusing as to why poverty is such a powerful predictor of criminality. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/073401689301800203
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:28 PM
5

Maybe I am the weirdo here. But This never came up with me. I have a sleep disorder that makes it really hard, or impossible, for me to get a job and move out of the house. I can't really express my feelings to my parents because our worldviews are so different on everything. So my big problem was just finding someone I trusted enough to express feelings and vulnerability too.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:14 AM
72

How did they think people would take that? Did they really think that men would understand, or believe, that "menaretrash" only refers to the ones who actually kill and abuse people, when saying "women are not to be trusted." obviously applies to all women?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:19 AM
1

The problem is that the "consistent advantage" part is wrong. Girls start out with better verbal abilities than boys. But the difference disappears by the age of 6 for unknown reasons. http://interactingminds.au.dk/fileadmin/interacting_minds/Putitative_sex_differences.pdf
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:22 AM
14

We need to give her the benefit of the doubt and assume that she actually does believe what she says she believes.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:01 AM
3

Then sue.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:03 PM
1

Fight fire with fire. Address others as "African-American female." or whatever descriptor is accurate towards that person.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:39 AM
1

Also, its true that most women don't orgasm from intercourse. But some of them do. To argue that they never experience it as sexual, is very difficult. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/200903/the-most-important-sexual-statistic
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:01 PM
3

"First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such." Then why do any women commit rape at all? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178916301446?via%3Dihub
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter