TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Using >3M profile views on online recruitment services, a new study found that recruiters are 6.7% less likely to contact women in male-dominated sectors, and 12.6% less likely to contact men in female-dominated sectors.

ElmerMalmesbury

January 24, 2021
25 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03136-0
Archived from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a place for the discussion of men's issues from a left wing perspective.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Using >3M profile views on online recruitment services, a new study found that recruiters are 6.7% less likely to contact women in male-dominated sectors, and 12.6% less likely to contact men in female-dominated sectors.
Author

ElmerMalmesbury

Upvotes 25
Comments 6
Date January 24, 2021 5:48 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/l444wd/using_3m_profile_views_on_online_recruitment/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/using-3m-profile-views-on-online-recruitment.1062036
https://theredarchive.com/post/1062036
Top posts by ElmerMalmesbury

I made a series of posters to inform people about sexist discrimination, and its similarity with racist discrimination

2173 upvotes
September 26, 2021
/r/MensRights

I made a series of posters to inform people about sexist discrimination, and its similarity with racist discrimination

360 upvotes
September 26, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration

73 upvotes
April 30, 2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

African countries with more female legislators receive more foreign aid

59 upvotes
April 9, 2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The grading gap: a meta-analysis

51 upvotes
February 7, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Invisible hurdles: Gender and institutional differences in the evaluation of economics papers

36 upvotes
April 12, 2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

What's the male advocacy blogosphere like, and what should it be?

35 upvotes
October 8, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Invisible privileges: what racism and sexism have in common

27 upvotes
September 30, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Comments

[–]ElmerMalmesbury[S] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The article, published in Nature, is well-written and easy to understand, so I'd recommend checking it out. Briefly, they recorded how long recruiters spent on each profile, and whether they clicked or not on the "contact" button to get in touch with the candidate. They used a LASSO-based) model to see how the different pieces of information visible to the recruiter would increase or decrease the probability of pressing the "contact" button.

Pooling all occupations together, there is no overall gender discrimination, contrary to the common belief. Everything else equal, men are 12.6% less likely to be contacted in the top five female-dominated occupations.

There is also a fun analysis of discrimination depending on the time of the day. It looks like recruiters discriminate more just before lunch, or before the end of their workday. That speaks in favor of implicit, unconscious bias rather than a deliberate decision.

(And of course, there is a lot of data on ethnic discrimination, but you knew that already.)

[–]Strikester101 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you point the part where it shows that men are 12.6% less likely to be hired in female-dominated professions? Does it account for all factors?

[–]ElmerMalmesbury[S] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This average null effect, however, masks sizeable heterogeneity. Although women face a penalty of 6.7% in occupations that are typically dominated by men (weighted average of gender penalties in the five occupations with the lowest female share in the search list), men face a penalty of 12.6% in occupations that tend to be dominated by women (weighted average of gender penalties in the five occupations with the highest female share in the search list).

As for whether they account for all factors, their model uses all the jobseeker characteristics that are visible to the employer. It's stratified by search, meaning that they compare only profiles that were shown to the same recruiter within the same search session. So I wouldn't say they account for all factors, since no model is perfect, but as far as I can tell, it's pretty good.

[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is consistent with previous studies that demonstrate systemic gender biases that are significantly higher among women than men.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/

Put simply: women are far more likely to be biased in favor of other women whereas most men have very little bias at all, sometimes even favoring women more than other men.

[–]ElmerMalmesbury[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's possible, but I'm not sure the gender ratio of workers in an occupation matches the ratio of recruiters in the same occupation.

[–]Dunkolunko 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Were these cases of artificial resumes that on average show similar qualifications for each gender or were they actual applicants? If the latter, it would be interesting to see the relative likelihood of clicking contact for identical or statistically similar resumes of each sex. See if any bias remains in male dominant jobs once qualifications are accounted for.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter