1. Principles such as AWALT are, structurally and essentially, equivalent to the ones comprising the main foundation of contemporary feminism. AMALT is a principle implied in most feminist arguments, only not as opaquely and (let's say) honestly acknowledged as is AWALT in MGTOW.

  2. MGTOW is a reactionary movement. Perhaps it is needed on some levels, but it is by no means exempt from being a reaction. True indifference does not wear a mask, or any kind of artifice—it does not need a protocol.

  3. Eyes forced into indifference in the face of a threat you know to be impotent are not the eyes of a being in control. To respond to an attack rooted in and wielding irrationality is to succumb to it also—to respond to an attack is to validate it as an attack and give its origin credence. It is no doubt that the feminist movement has developed into a tribalistic world-view—as such, one should laugh at it, laugh at the very idea of honoring it with a response. To hold a peaceful indifference in one's gaze is to be free; however, to have it emanate easy laughter—that is to be alive.