https://reason.com/2020/01/14/the-woke-primary-is-over-and-everyone-lost/#comments
"
The truth is, like it or not, women should not be allowed to vote… If you want a free society.
Every bit of scientific evidence ever collected proves men and women think in fundamentally different ways. Basically all the stereotypes are true. Women are emotional instead of rational. They demand safety and security above freedom. “But what about the children!” works 99.98% of the time on them.
Personally I WISH people were all equal and the same… But we’re not. And the way female brains are wired makes them default against freedom and liberty, and unless we genetically engineer all women to have male wired brains, that will never change.
So you can either allow women the vote… Or you can do what the Founding Fathers did, and deny females and stupid men (the land owning provision was a stand in for not a blow it case) the vote.
That’s all there is to it. We will never restore freedom while women can vote. We may well have to deny suffrage to idiot men again too through some mechanism. You don’t have to LIKE those facts, but they are facts none the less. The US, and basically every other country in the world, shoots faaaaaaaar to the left the second women are given political power.
This of course comes with the caveat “not all women,” because there is individual variation… But at the statistical level it is 100% true. Also, this doesn’t mean we need to be savages like the Muslim world. Women had property rights, could go to school, work, etc in the western world before they could vote… They just can’t be trusted to directly have a say in things. They can gripe at their husband about stuff, and start civil societies for things… Just no direct ability to influence the law. That’s still more freedom than even MEN have had throughout most of human history, so not much to bitch about IMO. Incidentally it’s ALSO more freedom than either men OR women will have if we allow the commie control freaks to take over, which will surely happen with women voting.
So take your pick, freedom or slavery."
[–]richlad10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trancedj5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trokanar2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut4 points5 points6 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mryoyo993 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Not my issue. But of course the problem with women voting is explained in that long comment that I posted.
[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
It would be nice if one's vote was weighted with IQ. People with 130 IQ get maybe 4x as much say as someone with 85 IQ.
[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trokanar1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CuriousIncel20 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trokanar1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
It doesn't matter. If those 45% would vote in roughly the same %s as the people who did, it won't change the outcome. 1% of the population could vote and it would be the same if a random sample.
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes and doesn't change what a representative sample is.
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trokanar1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thehedgehawg0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]iseehot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link