~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
zxcv46
[–][deleted] 81 points82 points83 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
In our society women are treated like children.
[–]DangZagnut56 points57 points58 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Only because mentally they act like children.
[–]0signal056 points57 points58 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
They don't act like children. They are children. Women stop maturing mentally at a very early age. It is us men who continue maturing until late in life.
Interestingly enough, women claim men are never mature or grown up. Projection, I guess.
[–]Careful_Description16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
What age is it? 16?
[–]goooglercooler 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I have several sisters of various ages, I would say it's different, my youngest sister has the mental intelligence of a 15-year-old girl, she throws temper tantrums and just is all around a temperamental person, exactly how a 15-year-old girl is, very hormonal, my other sisters are 3-5 years older than me (in our 30s) and they probably have the mental intelligence of an 18-year-old, as they've gotten older they've realized they aren't that valuable anymore. As they approach 40, they realized they played into the same bullshit hand society sells most of the world and they've realized they've been tricked, but, approaching 40, just have had to accept it.
[–]fuming_mbiker6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is so interesting, do they try to warn other younger women around them of the dangers, or are they jealous of their youth and so won't say anything?
[–]goooglercooler 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Very jealous and actively try and sabotage their own daughters thought processes
[–]DIG_ROOKIE_DIG5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This somehow doesn't surprise me. Get mad because you bought into a lie that you can run amok and do whatever you want, partying it up from now through infinity, and whenever you get done, you can still get everything promised to you.... Then proceed to fuck your child's life up, because you're salty that you made poor choices and lacked the capacity of critical thinking. Yea, that's a good idea. Let's just live our our petty revenge fantasies and set our children up for failure.
Makes you shake your fucking head.
[–]Dziubell2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Uhm, do you really have to ask that?
[–]0signal05 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Late teens.
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Depends on when the boobs come in.
[–]NotLuceBree2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are society's dependants.
[–]Petrus_ 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because they're just as retarded as them
[–]DogsOfParadise2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But they vote
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also like children - they always vote for Santa Claus...
[–]Careful_Description33 points34 points35 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I made a post from a YouTube comment how these numbers plays out IRL.
NOTE: "Men" and "Women" used in context of the country/society at large. No need to point out small groups/exceptions. The gender pay gap is a sign of women's privilege not oppression. Pay is more than just money. Pay is also the degree of safety, comfort, flexibility, job satisfaction etc that a job gives you. Monetary pay can easily be divided up and shared with others. We encourage men to get jobs which pay low in comfort, safety etc and high in money, then we divide up their monetary pay between the man, women and the state. Middle aged men are the ONLY demographic who pay more taxes than they consume. "No. Pay is just money." Then why do catering jobs on oil rigs pay more than catering jobs at the local school? If the actual catering work is identical they should pay the same right? "The same social services that are available to women are available to men" All those silly homeless veterans sitting on the street when there’s social housing available to them eh? Gosh men are just stupid aren’t they.... We throw lots of free money at women via welfare, special services, and men's greater contribution to household income. This 'free money' allows women the privilege of being able to take jobs which pay less money, but more of those other non financial forms of pay. All those other forms of pay benefit the woman only. They cannot be divided up and shared with men or the state. So women taking lower paid jobs which offer loads of perks (non financial pay) and then having men subsidize the rest of their financial income (the other 23%) is actually a selfish choice.... not oppression. Women consume about two thirds of tax spending. Men contribute about three quarters of tax revenue. The net flow of money is from men to women, not only in terms of tax/spending, but also because men generally contribute more to household income than women. Most women are hypergamous, which means they marry men of equal or higher social status and expect those men to be the main breadwinner. This net flow of money from men to women means women can AFFORD to take on jobs which pay less actual money and offer more non financial pay instead (comfort, safety, convenience etc). Another way to look at it is this.... If we cut the wages of the men then women's standard of living would go down because men effectively subsidize women's lifestyles. For every dollar a woman spends she only has to earn 77 cents of it. For every dollar a man spends he has to earn 1.23 because he has to subsidize women to the tune of 23 cents on the dollar.
NOTE: "Men" and "Women" used in context of the country/society at large. No need to point out small groups/exceptions.
The gender pay gap is a sign of women's privilege not oppression.
Pay is more than just money. Pay is also the degree of safety, comfort, flexibility, job satisfaction etc that a job gives you. Monetary pay can easily be divided up and shared with others. We encourage men to get jobs which pay low in comfort, safety etc and high in money, then we divide up their monetary pay between the man, women and the state. Middle aged men are the ONLY demographic who pay more taxes than they consume.
"No. Pay is just money."
Then why do catering jobs on oil rigs pay more than catering jobs at the local school? If the actual catering work is identical they should pay the same right?
"The same social services that are available to women are available to men"
All those silly homeless veterans sitting on the street when there’s social housing available to them eh? Gosh men are just stupid aren’t they....
We throw lots of free money at women via welfare, special services, and men's greater contribution to household income. This 'free money' allows women the privilege of being able to take jobs which pay less money, but more of those other non financial forms of pay. All those other forms of pay benefit the woman only. They cannot be divided up and shared with men or the state.
So women taking lower paid jobs which offer loads of perks (non financial pay) and then having men subsidize the rest of their financial income (the other 23%) is actually a selfish choice.... not oppression.
Women consume about two thirds of tax spending. Men contribute about three quarters of tax revenue.
The net flow of money is from men to women, not only in terms of tax/spending, but also because men generally contribute more to household income than women. Most women are hypergamous, which means they marry men of equal or higher social status and expect those men to be the main breadwinner.
This net flow of money from men to women means women can AFFORD to take on jobs which pay less actual money and offer more non financial pay instead (comfort, safety, convenience etc).
Another way to look at it is this.... If we cut the wages of the men then women's standard of living would go down because men effectively subsidize women's lifestyles.
For every dollar a woman spends she only has to earn 77 cents of it. For every dollar a man spends he has to earn 1.23 because he has to subsidize women to the tune of 23 cents on the dollar.
[–]crshdurmomlstngt9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is excellent data....
It needs to be exposed to the masses, but I do not think that they will be receptive of it.
#shouldershrug
[–]DemonGroover23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This needs to be rallied and protested against. Let's get some yellow jackets.
[–]SMAN9e7ee77721 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I am printing this and putting it up in my university
[–]Error404_Missingno26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Let us know if you ever need a lawyer
[–]SMAN9e7ee77722 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think i am already convicted of thought crime
[–]TryDoingSomethingNew7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[MALE SHAMING INTENSIFIES]
[–]harmonic_blast 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Men are the backbone of civilization yet we get zero respect or regard.
[–]FalsePositiveRethink10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Worse. Much worse.
They repay our generosity and selflessness with utter contempt.
MGTOW: a trillion reasons.
[–]harmonic_blast 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're absolutely right about that.
[–]Cristi_Tanase11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
is the gender tax gap and no feminist will ever talk about it
[–]DWShimoda9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Note especially the point where the dotted BLUE line crosses back up above the $0 line.*
That's age 35-39.
Ironically enough, if you've actually lived as a MGTOW, that is lived relatively frugally, minimalist, AVOIDED squandering your earnings on chasing pussy... and instead saved & invested...
Then THAT (give or take a few years) is about the age when you'd be able to RETIRE.
And thus NOT be a "slave to the system" for the next ~40 years.
* Also, one really should note that the prior "below the $0 line" for men is basically BULLSHIT -- most of the cost that is "burdened" onto (attributed to) men is in fact the cost of "public schooling" (aka a combination of "urchin incarceration" and "free child-day-care" for irresponsible** breeders -- it really didn't "benefit" you, and in fact arguably was largely about PREVENTING you from reaching anything like your full potential, as well as categorically inhibiting you from working/earning {and REALLY "learning"} during your teen years).
** Those who engaged in ZERO planning for forethought about how they were going to care for, much less guide to maturity, their own offspring.
[–]Birdy_blue3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Love the way you sum up education
[–]DWShimoda8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Love the way you sum up "education"
It isn't really education, it is "education" (scare quotes).
And BTW that summary is historical FACT regarding the bases of the so called "education" system.
It largely began as a means of getting "urchins" off the streets.
It was expanded -- especially via a combination of compulsory "schooling" laws and anti-child-labor (i.e. prevent teens from participating {and thus competing against adults, especially "unionized" adults} in the workplace & force children to BE utterly dependent... essentially "trapping" them in {often abusive} homes/environments).
The further expansion -- particularly to enhance the further degradation of families/undermining of parental (especially "patriarchal") guidance -- by enabling "feminist" desires to NOT have to actually care for (and in many cases even feed) their own children, and to facilitate THEIR entry into the "workplace" (i.e. invade & usurp control over male space).
EDIT:*
NONE of that is at all about actually educating anyone -- at least not unless by "educating" you mean "socializing/indoctrinating" into the service of & submission to the state.
Ever notice how virtually everyone ASSUMES that 12+ years of "schooling" (sitting like an inert lump at a desk with a woman at the front babbling about trivial inanities & bromides, ostensibly conveying "knowledge" about things she herself does not comprehend)... that this is somehow only only THE best way for children to "learn"; but that it is the ONLY way to do so.
How in the world did humanity survive for millennia -- and not only survive, but thrive and develop the "advanced technology" and "civilization" -- how did that happen without this "schooling" system... which after all, only appeared within the last century or so.
* It also of course serves as essentially a "socialist jobs program" (jobs AND benefits AND ridiculous "pension" program) for a huge number of females (>4 million) who otherwise have essentially ZERO "marketable" skills (and who due in no small part to their own "education/indoctrination" and skills-status invariably are or become "socialists" themselves).
[–]Birdy_blue6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I totally agree with you, I really do. I wish I hadn't wasted so much of my life at school, I'm only 20 but that's time I won't get back. I'm grateful only for the fact that school didn't completely beat the desire to learn out me, as hard as it might have tried.
[–]DWShimoda3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I totally agree with you, I really do. I wish I hadn't wasted so much of my life at school, I'm only 20 but that's time I won't get back.
It's really much, much worse than simply the forcible "waste" of many years -- alas, your PRIME intellectual & skill development years...
It really DID effectively "incarcerate" you -- prevented you from seeking out and interacting with actual working adults whom you might have preferred/chosen to learn from -- and instead forced you to be subservient & obeisant to a group of "quasi-adults" (who themselves generally have ZERO life-experience -- particularly productive "work" experience -- outside of a "schooling" system; and moreover who at best, are generally intellectual "midwit-mediocrities").
And just as bad, forced you to intermingle with (essentially ONLY) "age-mate" peers... determined NOT by your intellectual age, but your physical birth-date.
I'm grateful only for the fact that school didn't completely beat the desire to learn out me, as hard as it might have tried.
Indeed... just TRY to imagine what you MIGHT have been able to achieve (learn, develop, create) had even a FRACTION of the "resources" -- which were supposedly taxed from your parents and other adults to expended "on your behalf" (but in fact were a subsidy of a "socialist" idiot class of adults) -- had even a PORTIO of the approximately ~$10,000 per year [in current year dollars] for 12+ years (totaling something well over $100k) been placed at YOUR disposal... or expended in an EFFICIENT manner to provide you with tools & equipment...
Instead of building a massive brick "prison" -- complete with chain link fencing, surveillance cameras, perpetual group guards, administrative wardens, and most likely a daily mini-Diesel Therapy transport system -- that money could have easily paid for a (small but decent) HOUSE for each and every student.
And that's WITHOUT talking about the ridiculous excess/waste of money on "college/university" -- the CHIEF "merit" of which (if any) is essentially "access to a library" (of books & other printed/written material) -- the vast majority of which are now readily available (FREE, or at least they could be) via internet & wifi, etc. Assuming of course that you were actually 'literate' enough to be ABLE to -- and interested/motivated enough to truly read AND comprehend it -- which same set of assumptions it should be noted, also (at least ostensibly) underlies the "college/university" system itself.
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Diesel therapy
Diesel therapy is a form of punishment in which prisoners are shackled and then transported for days or weeks. It has been described as "the cruelest aspect of being a federal inmate." It has been alleged that some inmates are deliberately sent to incorrect destinations as an exercise of diesel therapy. Voluntary surrender at the prison where the inmate will serve his time is recommended as a way of avoiding diesel therapy. The case of former U.S. Representative George V. Hansen involved accusations of diesel therapy, as did the case of Susan McDougal, one of the few people who served prison time as a result of the Whitewater controversy.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
[–]ChadeepThundersheet0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Man this is woke as fuck. I have reached the same conclusions myself.
[–]mkultra336 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Where the fuck does all that money go for women of all ages?
[–]roadblumeta5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
New Zealand: the country that figured this out- THEN elected a feminist socialist as Prime Minister!
[–]Fantoche_Dreemurr4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No wonder women are absolutely crazy about Daddy government, the laws are simply a transfer of wealth from men to women.
[–]lone-ranger-1304 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I would like to point out that this article, screenshotted from "judgybitch", references a research paper that studies data based on surveys in Norway.
I am all for disproving myths like wage gap and all that bullshit. But let's not do the same thing they do, which is cherry pick certain stats and zingers to substantiate the existence of mythical non existent gender differences.
Although there are a few tax breaks and credits that women owned businesses get in the US, I would be very surprised if the difference of tax incidence is that much different here. I do not know the actual data, but I would like to point this out for people who would just look at something and assume it as true for everywhere. Yes I'm sure men pay more here, but that's all relative to how many working and earning men we have.
Women might fuck men over, but the government fucks us all. Indiscriminately. Doesnt care about your gender.
[–]Uptown_NOLA2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would suspect it is still a significant gap mostly owing to Earned Income Tax Credit which goes up based upon how many children you have. When younger I was friends at work with a woman who had the same job as I had. Me, no kids and her single with two kids. I paid about $5,000 in taxes that year and she paid no taxes and got a check for $3500. We made the same amount. Earned Income Tax Credit redistributes a ton of money from men to single moms.
[–]YertDirt4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can some ELI5? Tax for things like income have brackets and other taxes are the same rate?
[–]thwml3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
>Equalize the tax gap
Isn't this the whole point of the Thot Audit?
[–]RoyalAura 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Data is beautiful.
[–]defiantplatypus 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women vote for social programs and welfare as if they don't have to pay taxes, because they don't pay taxes, and that's why all democratic governments are doomed to eventually collapse in debt.
[–]GiitaFan9 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Does anyone have the link to the study that I can use?
[–]formerlydeaddd1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Finland?
[–]thotless_rat_bastard0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Worth reading a few times!
[–]Atton_Risk0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We need tax equality NOW!
[–]solaceFromSolitude0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have encountered women who really did not seem to understand how this all works. For instance, long ago I met an immigrant lady whom I fancied quite a bit. She was without a job and didn't do anything to better her situation. She did not feel any guilt or shame for not sustaining herself.
I asked her who she thinks pays for the benefits she gets. She said "the government". She did not understand that the government does not produce money. All this money is paid by taxpayers. She did not believe me. She scolded me for being "stupid". Et cetera.
Never again. Taxation is theft. Make your own money.
[–]MrMannheim0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Two very easy ways to fix this:
If you take out more than what you put in, you are no longer allowed to vote/hold office. This is only temporary; every year at tax time will decide whether you deserve to have a voice. Politicians will realize that a significant portion of their voting base will become irrelevant and will cater to the voices with votes. As a bonus, less tax money will be diverted to supporting the "free riders" and we'll start seeing less welfare being funneled out to the most useless of our society. This has the greatest chance of being passed if people began talking about this idea using gender NEUTRAL terms. A feminist will never admit that women are THE largest tax burden and so will not have a logical reason to argue against it or bring it up. If she admits that women are the problem, she just let slip the goddawful state of affairs plaguing our country are due to women/feminism. If she says nothing, people will realize that there is literally no reason why this shouldn't be implemented. Its a catch-22.
Drop all welfare. All of it. This is the most extreme method, but it will fix shit real quick. People will figure out how to get by on their own (as they always have) and the ones who can't have to live off of charity (which I'm fine with; people can donate as much money as they want so long as it's voluntary. Taxes are NOT VOLUNTARY) or they will die off...no big loss. This will NEVER come to pass since this method will lead to immediate and mass starvation of the dipshits and their crotch spawn, something no politician would want on their careers.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 81 points82 points83 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut56 points57 points58 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]0signal056 points57 points58 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Careful_Description16 points17 points18 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]goooglercooler 21 points22 points23 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuming_mbiker6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]goooglercooler 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DIG_ROOKIE_DIG5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dziubell2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]0signal05 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotLuceBree2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Petrus_ 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DogsOfParadise2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Careful_Description33 points34 points35 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]crshdurmomlstngt9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DemonGroover23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SMAN9e7ee77721 points22 points23 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Error404_Missingno26 points27 points28 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SMAN9e7ee77722 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TryDoingSomethingNew7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]harmonic_blast 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]FalsePositiveRethink10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]harmonic_blast 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cristi_Tanase11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda9 points10 points11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Birdy_blue3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Birdy_blue6 points7 points8 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChadeepThundersheet0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mkultra336 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]roadblumeta5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fantoche_Dreemurr4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lone-ranger-1304 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uptown_NOLA2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YertDirt4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thwml3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RoyalAura 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]defiantplatypus 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GiitaFan9 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]formerlydeaddd1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thotless_rat_bastard0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atton_Risk0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]solaceFromSolitude0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrMannheim0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link