I know everyone here already knows this, but it's amazing that literally 99% of the "arguments" against MGTOW are just ad-hominem feminist shaming tactics like "you're just bitter ugly virgins/closet incels", and even if that was true, does that make our arguments any less valid? If you point out anything, no matter how true it is, like how women get treated like princesses, how women always date guys more attractive than them, how many women are incredibly shallow and only talk about sex or fashion, how women only consider it rape if the man is attractive etc etc. If you point out any of these things you are guaranteed to get bombarded with shaming tactics like "you're just a sour ugly virgin incel that can't get laid", but never any actual valid arguments that refute your points.

​

Women know that they have no arguments against MGTOW because it's the irrefutable truth, so they will do everything in their power to silence you and prevent the truth from reaching others, and ofcourse the most effective way of doing this is through shaming tactics. And like i said, even if we were all just ugly virgins that can't get laid, does that make our arguments invalid? The only reason why MGTOW isn't mainstream is because of shaming language, if we want the truth to reach more men we need to undermine shaming language as a whole.