Offended / feminist view VS reality

AussiePhil82 · 2017-09-23T04:52:10+00:00

Women do suck at maths. It is known.

noonethethird · 2017-09-23T06:15:32+00:00

This fucking patriarchal math, doesn't even make sense. They made it only to keep women away from STEM because it's a neckbeard nerd cryptic shit for losers.

Woman trying to learn math.

Gobc · 2017-09-23T05:17:44+00:00

BOOM mic drop

IntrovertedMagma · 2017-09-23T10:17:34+00:00

Math is about finding logical solutions.. Guess what? Women never like logic.. Guy who talk logic are boring... Logical solutions are not sexy..

BTW.. To be fair. Men who don't like logic also suck at math.. I never met a guy who seemed logical and was good at math..

In conclusion, most of women are not logical therefore they suck at math. Not every man is good at math but a good chunk of men are logical and thus good at math..

This is not very relevant but i just remembered this..once our elementary math teacher told us, if you are good at math you are good at everything.. Because you are a logical individual.. Of course, this wasnt in the US because otherwise would have been fired if he said that in class.. Kids would be offended..

TakeYourDailyDose · 2017-09-23T07:30:30+00:00

A great "feminism in a nutshell" image.

Perhaps the worst folly of these types of feminist delusions is that they earnestly believe someone could get away with saying "women suck" at anything in public without getting lynched- to say nothing about someone in a public service job.

Itsalways451 · 2017-09-23T18:15:36+00:00

xkcd is cucked af

Cabshear · 2017-09-23T18:42:04+00:00

Hey, I'll admit...hand me a Calculus book and my eyes will bleed, but I will find the answer. I don't think it has to do with me having a dick tho. I'm just not lazy and not content with being ignorant.

SnapshillBot · 2017-09-23T02:46:26+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

Avyctes · 2017-09-23T19:06:07+00:00

Women can be logical however it is not their default setting. They gravitate towards emotionalism.

throwawaylifespan · 2017-09-24T08:12:38+00:00

The correct retort is 'You suck at English.'. Mathematic doesn't work.

ClonedLiger · 2017-09-24T13:38:59+00:00

X=square root of pi X=1.7725

Spungo1 · 2017-09-23T16:27:31+00:00

The original xkcd is correct. It's an effect called confirmation bias. The bias neither confirms nor denies the validity of the stereotype itself. It can be true that women in general are bad at math. It can also be true that one specific woman is bad at math. The two cases may or may not be related. If the woman is bad at math because she has down syndrome, it would be irrational to say she is bad at math because she is a woman.

It's hard to explain what I'm trying to explain. Statistics take a lot of time to internalize and appreciate. Even if one had a statement like "biological sex explains 80% of the male-female math gap," it would still be wrong to say a woman with down syndrome's problem with math is 80% due to gender and 20% due to other factors. The size of the factor needs to be taken into account. For example, stabbings explain very little of mortality rates in the US, but one cannot then make a blanket statement saying that increased stabbings will be fine for any given individual. The effect of stabbings or down syndrome can be catastrophic for the individual but trivial for the group because it doesn't happen very often. If you met 100 girls who are bad at math, you could say girls are bad at math. If you met 1 girl bad at math, you cannot say girls are bad at math because you can't know if other factors are at play.

Title	Offended / feminist view VS reality
Author	gerardchiasson3
Upvotes	210
Comments	17
Date	September 23, 2017 2:46 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/71vtf0/offended_feminist_view_vs_reality/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/offended-feminist-view-vs-reality.553905 https://theredarchive.com/post/553905

Comments