Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]New_User19846 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Well yes and no.
Certainly there ARE plenty of women who are making higher annual incomes than many men.
The problem with that kind of a "statistic/data" thing though is that it doesn't take into account WHERE and HOW those groups live, to wit:
Chick working in some "media" biz job might be pulling down $60k, even $100k a year and possibly for a half decade maybe even a full decade when she's in her "edgy-cool" years (mid 20's to early 30's), and that seems like (in nominal dollar IS) a shitload of money, probably a cool million or so in total income before she's a "has been" & shown the door. Problem is... she's also most likely located in/around NYC and "living THE life" (aka the "Sex and the City Life") which means [she's blowing all of that income at least as fast as it's coming in -- and in addition to paying an insane amount to rent a shitty flat -- it's mostly being squandered on incredibly STUPID shit. Not a few such "high earning" women end up "going home" (to parasitically live off of mommy & daddy) in their early to mid-30's, and without a proverbial pot to piss in from their years in the "big city."
By contrast, a lot of those guys are out in "flyover land" -- and during those same years (mid 20's to early 30's) maybe they're only pulling down $40k or $50k, but they're in a locale that has a LOT lower "cost of living", and if they're "wise" (and I've seen quite a few young guys wising up in this way) they're also "banking" a good chunk of that income in one form or another, buying & living in a home they're paying off quick, or else investing, OR building up a decent business. And when THEY hit their early to mid 30's -- assuming they didn't get hooked & divorce raped and have to "start all over again" -- they're just hitting their stride.
Fast forward another 10 to 20 years, and from 30 onward to age 40 to 50 there is generally NO comparison; which is why...
Because when men are in those 30+ to 50 year old ages... they have SOLID assets, and SOLID income.
Meanwhile the former "high earning" prima-donna's have long since gone to pasture -- popped out a kid or two (generally in an attempt to latch onto the assets/income of the aforementioned guys) -- and meanwhile their earning potential (which was primarily either "looks" or other "youth" related market value {i.e. the "edgy" feminista bullshit able to sucker OTHER young women like herself into blowing their cash}) has by the time they divorce, much like their vagina, long since dried up...
But by then, they have the "hostages" in the form of the kids -- useful for leveraging the HOME, half the man's assets, and often a good chunk of his paycheck to boot -- all "in the best interests of the children."
[–]Elbaiacu2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOW_Monger0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]T00000094 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Good gawd!
I mean I was already LAUGHING MY ASS OFF at virtually every one of the 10 points; my favorites being:
Which is just ridiculously hilarious in it's complete and total cluelessness (that first of all the "limited time/age appeal" of women as actual "commitment" mates is NOT based on their appearance, but in their fertility; and that secondly the appeal of a MAN to a woman is likewise not based on his "sex appeal" but on his wallet, assets, etc) -- it was blatantly obvious that this was written by a thoroughly indoctrinated "feminist" (and also obviously still < 40 -- she hasn't YET learned the extent to which she's been lied to -- give it a decade, probably a bit less).
Then this one:
Was just absolutely fucking ROTFLMAO funny. Bitch is basically claiming that men will all be "homeless" WITHOUT a woman -- the sad reality is ironically the OPPOSITE -- most homeless men are homeless BECAUSE they got involved with/committed to a woman (and she got the house).
There's also a sort of (I'm fairly certain unwitting) admission in there -- that the only way women are really going to have a "roof over their head" is if they acquire one from a MAN (or MEN) -- she doesn't realize it, but this is basically "every brick."
-- The next two are just incredibly ironic:
This douchette is headed for such a massive collision with the wall, it's ridiculous.
-- And the next, is just plain delusional.
IOW she really BELIEVES the MSM "statistics" -- though doubtless in the next breath, the next article she spews out, she'll be bitching and moaning about the "wage gap" and the "glass ceiling" etc. -- and of course (despite the fact that she is doubtless doing much the same) she's rather clueless about what all those women are DOING with their "out earning men" money -- and her focus on "status-display" shit like the proverbial "Mercedes S-Class Maybach" is just another example.
-- But really, yeah if they'd just have posted her picture next to the story ... well really that would have said it all just by itself.
[–]T00000093 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOW_Monger0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOW_Monger0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lie-deflector5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]hollybegin2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SnapshillBot1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtowguynow1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mikek44224 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Goateeki2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LibraryGuyMGTOW 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]droppincliffs0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOW_Monger0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LuRkeR781 point [recovered] | Copy Link