Shower thought on evolution and makeup

sanicthehedgefund · 2017-11-20T10:20:27+00:00

I agree. Make up caused a lot of damage to our species. While I don't believe too much in the alpha beta hierarchy, there are definately beta females. And they pose as alpha females with good skin. Unfortunately men took the bate. I wonder how disappointed some PUAs and redpillers would be if you showed them their "conquests" without make up. There go their 7s and 8s.

slyn69 · 2017-11-20T10:07:03+00:00

Definitely. The dumpsters are overflowing with trash. The sewers are clogged and toxic waste is bubbling up and flooding the roads. The west is a septic tank at critical mass about to burst.

Mapispema-ta · 2017-11-20T11:01:30+00:00

when i was in high school i had this insta wanna be thot classmate who always wore makeup like she tried to disguise herself like your average birthday cake. When she came one day without her makeup she was hideous as fuck, well she was hideous with makeup but more hideous without. You get the picture.

MadPreacher1AD · 2017-11-20T10:08:11+00:00

Make up has been going on for a lot longer than this. Try Jezebel from 9th century BC Israel as she was written about in 2 Kings 9:30-37. She painted herself up with make up and acted ungodly towards Jehu a prophet. She was sentenced to death for her crimes. She is an oft-repeated warning to later women to avoid painting themselves with make up and to commit sins against men of God.

This has nothing to do with self-esteem and self-image problems. It is a societal problem that has let women off the hook in regards to accountability. This is part of the reason why they are on drugs since they were designed to be helpmates to men. Their entire happiness is defined upon this role and a man's job is to keep his wife in check as the head of the house.

So anyway, this has been going back all the way to the 9th century BC in the Bible and further in artifacts. Make up was always associated with pagan fertility cults on top of the story of Jezebel.

TheOnlyThing-Sufjan · 2017-11-20T10:36:42+00:00

Lets not jump on the social darwinisme train to fast here. True that it might happen that lesser females attract the top quailty males, however in what regard are we talking here? Is it just looks, if so I'm not that bothered, if it is physical and mental fitness/capacity it is not a great thing, however following said point it is better to let the top man fuck every woman and let the lesser man fuck nobody. In that case you have the best possible offspring, therefor makeup can help accomplish this. The big point is that these top man are then forced to staying with said lesser woman, in the sense of child support atleast, therefore he is no longer willing to procreate with another woman. In short the problem would then not be make up but the idea that a top male should only have so many childeren and partners. In that case a counter meassure could be that the lesser males raise the childeren of the top males (aka chucks). This however is something man are not willing to do since the conclusion is that this social darwinism argument seems to fail.

Second what is even more important in my opnion is that woman cannot seem to pick out a suitable mate in the sense that they still judge man according to pre society standards. Meaning that the actual sexual attraction (which is based on certain aspects which gives the best offspring in primal times) is based on predicates which are most helpfull in a pre technological society. So tall, jaw line, muscles, ect are all attractive features for woman, that is why they fall for said man. However said man could be immorral, stupid, have a fast collection of mental problems, ect. Therefore their genes might get spreaded alltough if the values where being selected which makes you valued in current society then woman should be attracted to intellegence, good moral character, mentally strong, healty. But this is simply not in their nature since our natural attraction and what makes valuebale citizens do not line up. Unfortunatly there is not allot we can do about that. Some might argue woman like men with money, well this is not necesserily true, since the women like the money not necesserily the man making it.

If we want to do selective breeding (which i'm very much against, from an ethical point of view), then the unfortunate conclusion will be that only a select few man will procreate and most man should be left childless. You might argue but why do the lesser woman get to breed, this is simply because the possibilty of lesser genes with greater genes can still create a good citizen. But lesser with lesser genes will make it less likley. Ofcourse this idea is total void of any social constructions which can help people flourish even if they are provided with lesser natural abilities. This is why social darwinism is always a tricky argument to make.

Darth_Toenail · 2017-11-20T10:51:25+00:00

Survival of the most dishonest

executedigging · 2017-11-20T11:42:22+00:00

Makeup hides skin problems, wrinkles, and bad symmetry. The female may hide it, but when she has male children, they wont be able to use makeup and they will be less likely to breed. The result is the bad genes are bred out eventually.

Also guess what all Nobel prize winners have in common. It isn't good skin, no wrinkles, and symmetrical faces. I'm not going to claim that there is no correlation between things like good genetic health indicated by facial symmetry and intelligence. Applying makeup takes skill and resources. Maybe that correlates to higher intelligence more than facial symmetry. I definitely would not claim makeup is causing "Idiocracy."

gMoneytz · 2017-11-20T13:02:44+00:00

I checkout the moment I hear "breeding".

If you are going to equate yourself with barnyard animals, then makeup is the least of your concerns.

Seriously some of you people are starting to act a little too much like Jr. geneticists, when you should really not.

Emanresu_rouy_esoohc · 2017-11-20T12:06:11+00:00

Beauty is based on symmetry, the golden ratio and the face of the averages. By artificially creating a new face, you will screw up the "face of the averages" part of the beauty-equation. So, I guess you have a point. To compete with other women for the best man, they have to use makeup or they lose instantly.

Jarwanator · 2017-11-20T16:35:30+00:00

There is a small area in Manchester (UK) here where the species is just different. Hey what's your name? "RaawrWAcababa"...Ok then! See you laters!

Skiguy91 · 2017-11-20T17:10:59+00:00

Maybe but it's only been half a generation at most that cake face and yoga pants started being the norm.

Title	Shower thought on evolution and makeup
Author	zRaXcPk
Upvotes	15
Comments	15
Date	November 20, 2017 9:39 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/7e7rig/shower_thought_on_evolution_and_makeup/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/shower-thought-on-evolution-and-makeup.533513 https://theredarchive.com/post/533513

Comments