Vice article on MGTOW

thefinn12345 · 2015-09-24T20:39:25+00:00

[deleted]

BugRover · 2015-09-24T22:10:36+00:00

"Also false rape accusations: They are fucking terrified of those gosh-darn prevalent false rape accusations."

Ah yes, because being accused of a crime that can lead to years of jail time, ruin a man's career -- not to mention the social ostracization that goes along with it -- is no big deal.

smh.

Mini_Mjolnir · 2015-09-25T00:29:04+00:00

Is it just me or does anyone else imagine this sell out writing the article with a woman standing over his shoulder?

mutageno · 2015-09-25T01:48:37+00:00

bad publicity is still publicity. Bring it on!

I suppose in this authors world marriage is a huge success and the "pay gap" is a real thing and divorce/family court is fair and balanced.

MGTOW is going to keep on growing, like it or not

pirate6728 · 2015-09-25T00:22:31+00:00

Didn't read. I've been around the block a couple of times, and after awhile you kinda know that some sources-- I'm looking at you, vice.com-- just write hit-pieces on things they don't want to understand.

2015-09-25T08:46:58+00:00

One way to tell how VICE and the commenters on Vice are disingenuous and deceptive liars is to understand that they hate PUA and "game" and shame men for trying to get laid, or say hello to women (Shoshana Roberts 10 minute walk), yet at the same time blast men for rejecting these cunts altogether. You can clearly see a lot of shaming and mocking of men for being "virgin losers who are still stuck in their mom's basement." The article doesn't even try hide it's one sidedness.

They shame MGTOW for being "virgins" yet at the same time shame men for chasing women, trying to talk to women, or using PUA tactics to desperately get laid with worthless women (which MGTOW kind of discourages if not reject). It almost seems like they can shame men for absolutely anything. All attempts by men (who aren't David Gandy) are written off as creepy and sexist. Male sexuality is demonized. Masculinity is demonized. I mean, how dare us want to play with sexy video game characters, or read comic books with big ass women, because of wimminz feelz, or not wanting to be prancing pussies.

When it's made clear that a lot of MGTOW men have suffered through disastrous divorces and relationships, that men are not seen as human beings, they make the excuse that "there are bad marbles in both sexes" and other such NAWALT arguments.

Luckily, if they tried to come and spread their deception in MGTOW forums, they get blasted with rationality, reason, logic, and clear thinking, where they scurry off like rats to write at Vice and Rawstory and WeHuntedtheMammoth, but if MGTOW go to their dirty places (like VICE and Raw Story), you'll just end up being back sassed, mocked, ridiculed, and snarked at with any addressing of points.

We argue many realistic issues and back our arguments using figures, statistics, and scientific and historical evidence.

A comment by Fuckbook user Evelyn Froend, a typical dumbass woman, who says:

Yes, except they spend their lives advocating the fact that they are better off without women and try and tell other men that they can be too. I don't give a fuck what these guys do and want, but advocating the stereotyping of all women and he fact that men shouldn't need them is just dumb and I find offensive. My bf isn't tied down or wrapped around my little finger - he can do whatever he wants! That's how real relationships should be - we are both independent people who spend our own hard earned money and just happen to love each other. I'm so sick of this mantra that dating and marriage is a jail sentence.

A typical defensive, NAWALT statement. This idiotic woman, which is how the vast majority of women are, turns a blind eye to how feminists, women, manginas, and white knights tell other men how they should lock themselves up in disadvantageous relationships, pay up for kids that aren't theirs, refuse to let men walk away from even their own kids (while the woman is allowed to abort or keep without the man's consent), support "he for she" and other feminist (man hating) initiatives (such as http://www.iamthatgirl.com/guy_pledge), admit to being a privileged oppressor, apologize for it and grovel for mercy, and a load of other lies that are continuously debunked with statistics and evidence. Look at this xojane condescending "article" talking down to men:

http://www.xojane.com/issues/feminism-men-practical-steps

She also has the typical idiocy (which is typical of women) to forget that women tell other women that they "don't need men" and that men are obsolete, redundant, and useless while at the same time try to get men to stay in the plantation and to support laughable initiatives like "he for she".

http://time.com/179/men-are-obsolete/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/rowanpelling/5771359/Men-are-redundant-but-lets-keep-them-anyway.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/katie-beswick/heterosexual-married-men_b_6808340.html

And one last thing the idiotic woman forgets is that the marriage is at an all time low, with the vast majority of divorces being initiated by women, where the men are financially raped, forced to pay child support and alimony to a woman, who in these modern times, don't deserve a damn cent.

http://news.yahoo.com/women-more-likely-initiate-divorce-not-dating-breakups-110114625.html

Froend also says she "loves" her simp, kind of like the women in this article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/randi-gunther/marriage-advice_b_5666990.html

Once married to her simp, Froend will take him to the cleaners and won't have an ounce of guilt.

Froend can take her NAWALT bullshit and shove it back up her unshaved you go girl feminist ass. Manginas, you can do the same you treacherous dickless weasels.

2015-09-24T23:19:28+00:00

Each time I read something out of a few circles I am in, I get a feeling that I can't say if it is about just getting older and grumpy or more condescending (and grumpy). The point that made me think like that is this:

They preach using their lives for "productive pursuits" (work, I guess?)

The only way to be productive is by working. Jesus. Fucking. Christ. If this guys meant "work for money" it just gets worse.

Lindenforest · 2015-09-24T21:26:51+00:00

Stopped reading at the end of the first part.

It is more of an ideological celibacy, one that crosses both national borders and religious divides. And the basic reason is the slow crawl toward gender equality.

mgtow4ever · 2015-09-25T03:43:51+00:00

Another Hatchet Job by Vice.

Anonymous_freeloader · 2015-09-24T22:58:48+00:00

https://vice-images.vice.com/images/content-images-crops/2015/09/24/inside-the-global-collective-of-straight-male-separatists-body-image-1443115781-size_1000.jpg

Told ya

_hazlo · 2015-09-25T04:23:15+00:00

Damn, I am a level 3 & didn't even know it.

2015-09-25T11:43:23+00:00

Ad Hominem

Morranaii · 2015-09-25T17:22:36+00:00

Level 3 - Economic Disengagement: a member at this stage refuses to earn more money than is necessary for sustaining life. He views the government as tyrannical and is trying to actively drain money from the bureaucrats. Level 4 - Societal Disengagement: this is as far as a mainstream MGTOW can go. Here the man refuses to interact with society any more than ever

haha lol who invented these 'levels'? Level 4 is such a bullshit.

frzndesserts · 2015-09-24T22:51:08+00:00

Yea the writer was a mangina! The article was kinda lame with usual retoric but in the end who cares! Mgtow is not looking for social acceptance ,its just a chosen new path in which to conduct your life. So no need to get upset

Title	Vice article on MGTOW
Author	overhere12345
Upvotes	15
Comments	34
Date	September 24, 2015 8:31 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/3m8tsk/vice_article_on_mgtow/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/vice-article-on-mgtow.641552 https://theredarchive.com/post/641552

Comments