​

Saturday Feb - 22 - 2020

We talk a lot about Briffaults law - “female not male, determines all conditions of the animals family. where the female can derive no benefit can be derived from association with the male, no such association takes place” Sure and if you’re well verse in Red Pill then you understand most women have this luxury because their reproductive organs make them more valuable.

But this entire theory can be reduced more. It’s not simply the female, it’s the person who has more value in general. If the male is worth signficinalty more than a woman and he decides he gets no value from her then no association will take place. This theory can be reduced to family and friendship and any social relationship. The person with more social, economic, political, etc power ultimately determines association. A celebrity decides if he wants to hang out with the homeless man, not the other way around. Maybe one or two cases but 98 out of 100 times the homeless man will want to hang out with Brad Pitt.

A poor person cannot do the same social activities that people with money do, unless that poor person is doing something to maintain their position. I cannot think of any associations, relationships between people, in which someone does not get something from the other person. A king will never hang out with a peasant.

People keep you for a reason. If you can’t figure out what that reason is then you probably won't be around for very long or your being taken advantage of. Even if the reason is because they pity you and they see it as morally good to hang out with you. But morally good only lasts for so long. Once you realize this you will see your value in more situations. And if you feel like others don’t want to be around you maybe you should look at where you don't have value. How could you contribute value to a situation?

Some people might think they loved their girlfriend/wife/crush for no reason other than because that person was so good on the inside or have certain qualities. I will argue this isn't true. More than likely they filled some type of void. Maybe their face was nice to look at and you enjoyed the chemical rush they brought you. Or maybe they made it so you weren't lonely. Or maybe they elevated your status. Either way we never do anything that hurts us on purpose, we at least imagine that other people we allow in our life will add to quality of life.

Donating to charity is not the same thing as associating with people. If I have a surplus of resources and share them randomly then that is not the same thing as physically spending time with others. I believe people do good things, and even do good things when nobody is watching but I do not believe people associate or form relationships for no reason.

People need to realize their position in life, their status, their standing, anything they have in life can be taken away at any second. Nothing about anyone can’t be taken away. Any time someone takes interest in you or reaches out is because they see something whether its potential or an opportunity to exploit for good or bad.

This isn't about getting girls. This is about making friends and building community. This is about fitting in the world around you just a little better. Almost nobody can be alone all the time.