~ archived since 2018 ~

Epigenetics

yourmomhasebolaids

March 26, 2019

5 upvotes

/r/MGTOW2

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190326-what-is-epigenetics

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Epigenetics
Author	yourmomhasebolaids
Upvotes	5
Comments	6
Date	March 26, 2019 11:15 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW2
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW2/comments/b5oem4/epigenetics/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW2/epigenetics.813909 https://theredarchive.com/post/813909

Comments

[–]DangZagnut 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]bishbashbosh89 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]NextAsianSensation 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i think the science could be 'right', in the sense that the phenomenon is seen, but real question is to what extent that is happening?
its like global warming, it exists, but to what extent?
the whole point of going to university is to keep an open mind and not be biased
I remember there was this female researcher who published a paper about how emotional trauma from insults had negative effects on the health of the individual, and the researcher wanted verbal assault to be treated like physical assault.
yes, emotional stress can cause decline in your physical health, but wheres the practicality in that? how would we measure that, and how would we implement that into law?
there is junk science, and then theres the practicality of new findings.
back to the global warming example, were not just going to stop using fossil fuels, because the global economy would grind to a halt.
but ignoring science, because you think its wrong impedes further research. if you push for 'global warming isnt real, etc.' and people hear you/others, and vote for political figures with the same mindset. they are going to reduce funding into those areas of research, and then we lose more resources to finding answers.
i mean trump actually promised to bring back coal jobs, yet his own secretary of energy claims that would not be practical, this is because we have better energy options thanks to improvement in energy research

[–]DangZagnut 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]NextAsianSensation 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i understand. the thing is everything is political at the end of the day. as much as scientist dont want to be in that position. like that gene drivers HIV baby case. or how investments are based on whether or not money can be made from it. (for ex. LED polymers were discovered in the 80's, but no one did anything until someone came along and decided they could be used to make monitors)
i myself have gotten very political in the past 2-3 years, because its hard to ignore all the political bs going on. like sjw's making claims about biology, which is in contrast to the moderate sociologists in academia who stick within their own field of expertise.
i definitely feel the hysteria has taken over our society, but i feel the only remedy is to educate more people... that or just restart the planet again

[–]DangZagnut 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link