The investigators went out of their way to find a bias in social attitudes towards women regarding sexual behavior (liberal vs. inhibited sexual behavior) and found that there is no such bias.

The more interesting thing about this study is how biased the investigators themselves were. They assumed that if there is any bias, it can only be against women, so their questionnaires did not include symmetrical question that would allow them to be sensitive to any kind of bias toward any of the two sexes. Foe example, they would ask male and female respondents what do they think (and what they think society thinks) about the statement "if a woman initiates sex she is being pushy", by rating their level of agreement, but their study didn't include the equivalent statement, "if a man initiates sex he is being pushy". And so on for each and every item. While as we all know, since October 2017 when Me Too erupted and was immediately hijacked by the radical of feminists, men and boys are considered much worse things than being "pushy" for even looking at women - as we all know, in London it's now a criminal offense for a man to look at a woman in the eyes, and we all know - women included - that sexual behaviors considered completely legitimate for women are considered unacceptable for men. However, this study, although performed much later than October 2017, blinded itself to any of theses double standards against men.

They in fact assumed in advance that the only possible double standard is against women, and so their research instrument was constructed in a biased manner with sensitivity only to a bias against women - non of the items was duplicated with the sexes switched. The study itself demonstrates by this the very thing is sought to examine - double standards in social attitudes toward one of the sexes.

It then reported that "there are no double standards" - it's great that feminists can now be given empirical evidence that refute their misconceptions, which cause them to bash men and perform "balancing actions" while there's nothing to balance meaning the actions only create an imbalance in the other direction (so a girl approaching a guy is admirable, a guy approaching a girl is harassment). However, the conclusion offered by the researchers that "there are no double standards" is, as we all know, a false conclusion, and it results from a questionnaire that was crippled in advance in a biased manner to become blind to half the phenomenon it was designed to be investigating - the male side of the double-standards of society in the realm of sexuality. Had it duplicated every item with the sexes switched, and ask about both directions of double standards, it's rather certain that the conclusion would be that there are double standards, against men.

Link to the full text: https://www.science.org/content/article/rule-change-reporting-sexual-misconduct-could-hurt-grad-students-and-others