Grass is greener on pay issues

fgrsentinel · 2019-06-08T17:00:06+00:00

So now feminists professors are using the apex fallacy in their college life? There's ninety professors working her department, 74 of them make less than she does, and she's crying "gender discrimination" because four male professors with far more duties than her make more than she does? What kind of logic do you need to justify that?

The four of them even have their salaries because of retention raises, indicating the university had to sweeten the pot to prevent them from being headhunted by other universities while she turned down such an offer at her previous job. She's basically complaining that she turned down a chance to make more at her old job and nobody wants to buy her out of her new job, so she should be getting more money.

Ody_ssey · 2019-06-08T14:02:42+00:00

Despite being a professor, she is still very delusional and incompetent.

2019-06-08T22:56:14+00:00

The average wage in the US is ca. 50k. She makes more than that. Most likely she also gets a pension until she dies.

Boohoo.

Mode1961 · 2019-06-09T00:40:08+00:00

** Of course, even a two penny per dollar gender pay gap is two pennies too much.**

I hate this statement, it seems to indicate that the 2 cents are even real when it might not be real. Did they account for EVERYTHING that effects pay, probably not? There could also be rounding errors. It could also be that they weighted thing wrong. e.g. In Canada (can't see it being much diff anywhere else) women work approx 18% less per week than men, that alone account for 18 out of the 20 percent difference ASSUMING that hours are linear when it comes to wages.

Title	Grass is greener on pay issues
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	28
Comments	5
Date	June 8, 2019 1:35 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/by818i/grass_is_greener_on_pay_issues/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/grass-is-greener-on-pay-issues.1206384 https://theredarchive.com/post/1206384

Comments