TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mode1961 Archive

View 164 posts and 3,307 comments by Mode1961 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1040

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:59 AM
1002

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:31 PM
692

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights24/11/18 09:12 PM
653

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights08/07/26 01:44 PM
600

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:55 AM
598

Anti-MRMMode1961/r/MensRights30/09/22 12:38 PM
476

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:45 PM
473

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:58 PM
412

False AccusationMode1961/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:11 PM
387

ProgressMode1961/r/MensRights16/11/22 04:16 PM
375

Activism/SupportMode1961/r/MensRights21/05/22 01:15 PM
361

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:28 PM
354

Mode1961/r/PussyPass30/08/19 05:22 PM
336

Anti-MRMMode1961/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:50 PM
330

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights06/12/20 09:31 AM
326

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:17 PM
290

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:42 AM
284

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights06/12/20 09:20 AM
274

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:44 AM
236

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:06 PM
231

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights28/12/25 11:42 PM
224

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:16 PM
223

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:59 AM
223

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:37 PM
217

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:00 PM
210

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights01/11/25 10:32 AM
209

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights07/12/22 11:31 PM
206

Mode1961/r/PussyPass12/09/18 12:01 PM
200

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights27/10/23 01:46 PM
177

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights31/07/24 04:23 PM
176

Mode1961/r/PussyPass25/06/17 11:36 PM
158

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:27 PM
155

mental healthMode1961/r/MensRights13/01/25 11:23 AM
153

Mode1961/r/PussyPass11/04/18 12:47 PM
149

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights25/09/17 03:27 PM
142

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights16/06/23 09:56 AM
138

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights06/12/23 04:52 PM
130

Mode1961/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:21 PM
127

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights15/02/23 06:12 PM
127

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:39 AM
122

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights01/03/26 10:43 PM
118

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:08 AM
116

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights23/07/19 06:34 PM
112

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:54 AM
110

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights17/08/17 02:53 PM
109

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:09 PM
107

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights14/06/20 01:17 PM
104

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:56 AM
95

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:51 AM
95

Mode1961/r/PussyPass17/10/17 01:30 PM
85

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:19 PM
83

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:05 PM
81

FeminismMode1961/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:24 PM
78

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:09 PM
77

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights18/03/24 03:27 PM
76

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:08 PM
73

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:21 PM
73

Mode1961/r/PussyPass06/03/19 03:26 PM
72

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights06/11/18 02:06 PM
71

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:50 AM
69

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights23/06/23 10:13 PM
67

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:09 PM
66

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:39 PM
65

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:56 AM
64

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:37 PM
61

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:31 AM
60

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights31/03/20 12:11 PM
56

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:53 AM
55

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights06/07/18 10:13 AM
54

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:58 PM
52

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:21 PM
51

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:27 PM
49

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:47 PM
46

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:50 PM
45

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:45 PM
45

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights19/07/25 03:37 PM
44

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights30/05/23 12:02 PM
43

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:01 PM
40

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights26/04/19 07:47 PM
39

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights17/05/20 01:45 PM
38

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:03 AM
35

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:57 PM
33

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:41 PM
32

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:32 PM
31

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:16 PM
31

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:32 PM
30

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:23 PM
29

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights03/07/26 07:31 PM
28

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:35 PM
28

ProgressMode1961/r/MensRights18/10/24 11:14 AM
27

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:52 PM
27

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:04 PM
27

Mode1961/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/18 12:10 PM
27

Mode1961/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:34 PM
25

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:42 PM
25

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:03 PM
24

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:38 AM
24

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:50 PM
24

FeminismMode1961/r/MensRights16/03/19 09:25 AM
23

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights17/08/20 02:11 PM
22

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:43 PM
21

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:21 PM
20

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights09/04/20 04:18 PM
19

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:03 AM
18

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:12 PM
18

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights07/06/20 05:38 PM
17

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:03 PM
17

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights08/07/18 12:49 PM
17

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:29 AM
16

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:49 PM
16

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:47 PM
16

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights13/08/23 09:49 PM
16

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:40 PM
16

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:42 PM
15

Anti-MRMMode1961/r/MensRights12/04/20 03:33 PM
15

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:26 PM
15

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights20/11/20 07:48 PM
14

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:16 PM
13

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights08/02/21 11:14 AM
12

FeminismMode1961/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:49 AM
12

Anti-MRMMode1961/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:35 PM
11

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:00 PM
11

Mode1961/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:08 PM
11

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:56 PM
10

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights30/03/19 10:45 AM
10

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:13 PM
10

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:23 AM
9

Marriage/ChildrenMode1961/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:43 PM
8

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:08 PM
8

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:36 PM
8

Marriage/ChildrenMode1961/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:28 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:59 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights25/09/23 05:44 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights10/05/19 07:30 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:43 PM
8

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:33 PM
7

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:06 PM
7

HumourMode1961/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:32 PM
7

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:59 AM
7

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:21 PM
6

False AccusationMode1961/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:29 PM
6

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:42 PM
6

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:13 PM
5

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:29 AM
5

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:16 PM
5

Edu./Occu.Mode1961/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:38 PM
5

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights03/08/17 01:49 PM
4

Fathers/CustodyMode1961/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:56 AM
4

Mode1961/r/PussyPass15/01/18 07:41 PM
3

FeminismMode1961/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:59 AM
3

Marriage/ChildrenMode1961/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:40 PM
3

Legal RightsMode1961/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:39 PM
3

DiscriminationMode1961/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:45 PM
3

GeneralMode1961/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:44 PM
3

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights13/06/20 02:47 PM
3

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights30/10/17 12:32 PM
3

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:21 PM
2

Mode1961/r/AntiFeminists25/04/19 10:08 PM
2

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:44 AM
1

Mode1961/r/MensRights06/01/21 10:27 AM
1

Marriage/ChildrenMode1961/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:32 PM
1

Social IssuesMode1961/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:07 PM
1

Mode1961/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:41 PM
0

Mode1961/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:37 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,307 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We use Service Now or SNOW for short
/r/MensRights08/07/26 08:30 PM
24

IT Support This person is quite young: 23, and It is my belief she just is so used to doing it online: It came out before she realized it
/r/MensRights08/07/26 07:37 PM
33

I think it was because it happened in teams in front of the whole team including managers and there was "PROOF" of what she said AND more importantly , What I said
/r/MensRights08/07/26 07:24 PM
2

That's been my experience as well. You can ask it a question about and ONLY about men and it will always try to interject something about women.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:30 AM
18

I would imagine it would be the woman simply denying the mans existence within the SA victimhood framework, as people like that don't believe a man can be SA'd by a woman.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 06:53 PM
9

In this day and age you can see this played out in AI sites like ChatGPT, if you ask any question about DV, it will always make sure to put in something about women e.g. I asked him "approximately how many men are victims of dv per year in the US / Canada", it started out with saying that while men can be victims , the majority are still women.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 02:33 PM
1

Probably because she doesn't appear to be conventionally attractive.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 07:07 PM
5

You forgot: The devil: IMHO, Modern Feminism is a religion with all the same gods, books, beliefs, including original sin (being a male) and even a DEVIL (Patriarchy) <-- all bad stuff bestowed upon women is done by the Devil
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:36 AM
9

What might have happened was they "SET" a target of 80% for participation rate, and women are only at 75%, so there for MEN have an advantage: It's kind of like the life expectancy rate used by the UN. Normally, women live approximately 15 years longer than men, so if your country is at 10 years, women are being discriminated against in your country.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:54 PM
66

She is 'older' I am willing to lay bets, this is NOT the first time she has done this.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 06:39 PM
5

When I was in High School, in the 1977 era. We had a NUN who was having sex with several of the male students; these guys would have been 15ish. They got caught: No charges were laid, she was thrown out of the convent but afaik, never spent a day in jail or even charged.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 08:01 PM
5

You are 100% correct: It isn't AI , it's simply algorithms that take a data set and, using some 'logic', come up with an answer: The data set and algorithm are heavily biased. Though it's gotten better, not long ago I did the "Tell me a joke about women" , it said it couldn't because that would be sexist ,was happy to tell me a joke about men
/r/MensRights09/06/26 08:28 PM
15

Because MEN die earlier: therefore they collect far less in their pension than women do
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:11 PM
16

Canada has an infanticide law as well that AFAIK: carries a MAX penalty of 5 years in jail AND it is only applied to mothers. Here is Chatgpt answer about this law Yes — partly. Canada’s infanticide law is widely criticized as being rooted in old, shaky, gendered medical assumptions, especially the idea that childbirth or lactation itself can disturb a mother’s mind in a legally meaningful way. Under Criminal Code s. 233, infanticide applies where a “female person” causes the death of her “newly…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:41 PM
45

AND yet if a hospital makes an honest mistake and gives the wrong child to the parents, they are on the hook for millions. If MOM lies, dad gets nothing. Make it make sense.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:38 PM
4

It wasn't that long ago, actually, that the person who could support the child financially got custody unless abuse was involved: then feminists figured out how to have their cake and eat it too, get custody AND the money. "Tender Years Doctrine"
/r/MensRights12/05/26 07:50 PM
1

It goes like this Men have something or more of something than women <> Gender Equality Women and Men have the same thing: Is gender equality Women have something OR more of something than Men, IS gender equality They even 'massaged' the life expectancy stat to make it look worse for women; they used "Healthy Years" so if you live longer but unhealthy (in theory), that is WORSE than if you die early
/r/MensRights06/05/26 02:56 PM
12

Two words for you Victimhood Pays
/r/MensRights06/05/26 02:54 PM
1

as far as I know both from US
/r/MensRights04/05/26 10:59 PM
0

This is from ChatGPT Choking: Rough estimate: If ~5,500 total deaths/year Women ≈ ~2,200 to 2,700 per year Killed by husband/boyfriend Core numbers (U.S.) About 1,000–1,300 women per year are killed by a current or former intimate partner (husband, boyfriend, or ex).
/r/MensRights04/05/26 06:34 PM
24

I remember reading a followup article when it came out that it wasn't 62 million men but rather 62 million visitors to the FULL Web site: of which over 35% we women. in the article the person tried to justify their other article by saying , he got some of the technicalities wrong I wrote a response in follow-up, "You have a funny way of saying you got most of the FACTS wrong."
/r/MensRights30/04/26 01:56 PM
2

To me, IMHO, and since this is a men's rights sub: What the indigenous community should also be appalled is the fact that 75% of the victims of indigenous people who are missing and murdered were completely invisible during a federal national inquiry.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 08:08 PM
2

Here's the problem with your analogy: the HOLOCAUST happened, the burials did NOT. What they found was NOT a part of the residential school tragedy but rather unmarked graves from a long time before the RS thing happened.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 08:06 PM
4

"Reactive Abuse" the latest buzzword for "Sorry, women are not responsible for anything".
/r/MensRights12/04/26 07:06 PM
17

I hate this, actually: If they wanted to make it "FUNNY" and relevant, she should have been tried as a MAN: After all, white men get much harsher sentences than black women. SO, Black adult assumes all black people get harsher sentences than all white people, which is not true.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:29 PM
44

I don't think some folks understand what IMHO feminists want: They want all the choices to be available to all women BUT without any penalty
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:25 PM
3

I think they missed a /S in their post
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:02 PM
2

I don't know where you live, but in a lot of Western countries, they have Safe Haven laws
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:02 PM
4

Where do you live: Since in Canada and the US the woman gets to put whatever name she wants on the birth certificate
/r/MensRights30/03/26 04:39 PM
12

You didn't answer the question though: Where are women lacking in rights.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 03:46 PM
12

The amount of victim blaming and "It was a long time ago, let it go" for this is amazing: AND so many "I love the show I wish they would just let this go", that one gets me every time
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:34 PM
14

In my opinion: This woman is owed a debt of gratitude by all men: WHY??? The reaction to her abuse of her boyfriend and child has shown, without a single doubt, the double standard that exists when women commit abuse. I mean did any of the talk shows have any male on that committed abuse against his wife or child. There are 100s if not 1000s of FB , IG etc posts defending her AND what makes it worse, the defense isn't that she didn't commit the abuse etc BUT rather, it was a 'long' time ago, jus…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 03:10 PM
23

What do you mean MEN have institutional power: Reading that I assume (correct me if I am wrong) that since most politicians are men this gives men institutional power, BUT it really doesn't , if you want to assert that you have to show how the few men in power use that power to benefit other (all) men, otherwise, MEN as a group don't have power.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 12:45 PM
9

Is it bad that as soon as I read she got actual jail time, my first thought was "She must not be conventionally attractive"
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/26 06:44 PM
1

I never said it was the NORM I said it was the norm for the outrage, big difference.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:43 PM
6

There might even be an admonishment of "This is the worst case I have ever seen and I am going to throw the book at you, 1 year house arrest"
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:41 PM
48

Remember this in 20+ years, there will be NONE
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:47 PM
1

While I am sure it's not 100% true looking at these videos, I notice that the vast majority of the pictures of the teachers are GLAMOUR shots while the men are booking shots
/r/MensRights06/03/26 04:35 PM
82

This reminds me of an article a few years ago, after two reporters died on the job: one man and one woman. Many articles then discussed how women are disproportionately represented in workplace murders, despite more men dying from workplace murders than women die from all causes.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:01 AM
1

My problem is that they are conflating two different things. Killing someone who is raping you IS NOT murder, it's self defence. There is a difference between murdering someone and just killing them , that's why there are times when killing is justified, BUT not murder.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:20 PM
33

/sarcasm ahead I am not from UK, but I am pretty sure there is a tenet in UK law that says, "Each tear shed in court, reduces a sentence by 6 months"
/r/MensRights03/03/26 08:15 PM
33

It’s interesting how scientists sometimes use DNA or biology to confirm someone was a woman, essentially letting biology define what is and isn’t a woman. It seems this is celebrated and not used as grounds for criticism, but only when the science highlights something considered positive about women.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 02:03 PM
15

Watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA8djGrsttA Perfectly explains it
/r/MensRights28/02/26 03:44 PM
4

Legally there is a difference, but fundamentally there really isn't
/r/MensRights13/02/26 07:38 PM
3

Possible another answer to the question: "Really what laws go against men but not women"
/r/MensRights29/01/26 08:22 PM
44

I just did the same thing the OP did, got the same responses he did, I cut and pasted the prompt and changed the gender words.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:53 PM
13

Actually, he doesn't. He can be forced to 'drop his seed', he can be a child who is forced to 'drop his seed' and nothing changes
/r/MensRights22/01/26 04:26 PM
6

If they were totally interested in what is best for the child, they would give the child to whoever could best support that child. The way it used to be.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:41 PM
14

That's the one: That case would have played out much differently if those rules had been in place.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 12:57 PM
34

Reading that story reminds me of the case here in Canada against Jon Gimeshi (spelling???) , he had text messages that showed a lot of the same stuff. What did Canada do? They prosecuted the women to the maximum extent of the law, and all the women got 20 years in jail for lying. OF COURSE THEY DIDN'T, they changed the law so that now the defence must turn over all evidence to the prosecution that they are going to use. This effectively gives the women time to customize their story.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:01 AM
10

There is a woman in my family circle who broke up with her long-term boyfriend about 6 months ago. Every single day she posts something about him on her FB page. I finally had enough, I told her, "You really need to stop complaining about your EX. It was your decision to get with him, it was your decision to stay, and it was your decision to leave. Try fucking owning up to that worldview"
/r/MensRights14/01/26 12:19 PM
4

IMHO, it's worse than that. They don't advocate for equality at all. They only support increases in "stuff" if they believe women lack that "stuff". If women are ahead, "like in getting custody," they fight with tooth and nail to keep it that way. See the reaction of large feminist orgs when a state/province/country talks about 50/50 custody as the starting point.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 01:58 PM
3

You need to do a lot more reading on the subject.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 09:36 PM
3

I just asked ChatGPT: "Has there ever been an egg donor successfully sued for support?" Short answer is "NO" , Long answer "Also NO"
/r/MensRights05/01/26 09:35 PM
7

Remember this: Who trains judges? In numerous jurisdictions, feminists orgs/Womens group come up with programs to "Train judges" on how things are. This leads to "believe women/mothers first" and everyone else last.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:13 PM
76

3 or 4 years ago, a buddy of mine who self-publishes decided to start submitting his books (fantasy) to 'real' publishers, for the first 6 months or so, he submitted under his real name, Michael Blue. No responses, so I told him, change it to Michelle and see what happens. He got several responses and even published a book. I changed the name of course to protect him.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 07:02 PM
3

If she is conventionally attractive, she will get probation at worst.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:24 PM
1

Fully Agree
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:39 PM
1

And IMHO that video is completely fake.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 01:28 PM
22

Your solution for men actually completely solves the abortion debate: Only women who are SA'd are entitled to an abortion: After all , if men choosing to have sex is also choosing to have a child, then equality says the same should apply to women.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 01:32 PM
6

I just love how people are talking about the "black eye" when it's just a watermark from the police station.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 05:45 PM
2

The rationale behind Child Support is actually based on the tender years doctrine(tyd) because before that Men (mostly) got custody because they were the ones who could provide for the Childs needs (financially), when TYD was put in place, largely at the behest of feminists, the 'system' had to make sure the mans money was still used to raise the child. ALAS, along came child support
/r/MensRights08/12/25 04:15 PM
1

When I read this I can't help but remember the feminist chant "If men are having problems why don't they just start their own men's help centers or orgs to help men" This Movember is why
/r/MensRights25/11/25 07:27 PM
18

.Let's say, for argument's sake, that the 4% number is accurate, I wonder what would happen if 4% of women who reported a rape were subsequently killed by the person who they reported. Would anyone cliam that's a very low number: NO: What would happen most likely is a national call to action to change the law.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:28 PM
54

Wait for it, I see bunches of articles looking to 'find out what happened to her", give it time: We will eventually see some 'expert' claim it was all her husbands fault for getting sick.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 06:16 PM
2

Imagine the outcry if a group of WNBA players has sex with a woman, are acquitted in court and then the WNBA says they can't play
/r/MensRights28/07/25 12:24 PM
126

Karen Straughn was right "Feminists might not hate men, but have you noticed how they always come up with a negative term, they will put MAN in front of it."
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:23 PM
3

Don't worry, they will find the nearest man to her and blame him
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/25 02:39 PM
27

Actually if even one woman had been killed the headline would be "26 people killed in India, including some women"
/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:31 PM
74

Why did they show the husbands face
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/25 03:07 PM
23

IT's a movie, not a documentary, it's like taking Silence of the Lambs to explain all aboutserial killers
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:41 PM
69

SO many people are treating this MOVIE as a documentary.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:36 PM
124

wanna bet, some new laws will come as a result of this MOVIE
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:52 PM
482

Holy Crap: They are pretending it is a documentary
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:47 PM
26

Too many people IMHO, taking that movie and treating it like a documentary
/r/MensRights31/03/25 02:36 PM
97

This reminds me of a saying I heard some time ago "If you can cause a person to lose a job, go to jail or to be assaulted by others just on your word alone, you are not oppressed in that society."
/r/MensRights28/03/25 07:34 PM
113

Isn't it the same with volunteer orgs, the vast majority are women because women actually have the time to 'donate' to them
/r/MensRights28/03/25 07:32 PM
1

I read a report many years ago that added "At RISK youth" to the sex trafficking numbers , iow, if a youth (girl) was living on the street, they were added to the number even if they were not involved in the sex trade
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:16 AM
18

A few weeks ago, I put into ChatGPT, "Give me the gender ratios for human trafficking worldwide" It said it was approx 70 (girls) to 30(Boys). I then asked it specifically to give me the gender split if we leave out sex trafficking, and in short, it refused to because sex trafficking was such an important issue. I tried several ways to word it, like "Give me gender ratios for forced labour"; again, it just kept talking about sex trafficking. It never ceases to amaze me how much is out there abou…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 07:51 PM
0

afaik: All male
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:12 PM
4

L&O is 'famous' for using real life events
/r/MensRights24/02/25 08:53 PM
2

I think the saying goes "If you want full equality you can't have freedom and if you want full freedom you can't have equality"
/r/MensRights21/02/25 09:33 PM
11

Depends on how lucky he is, a lot of court will impute income to him saying "You can always get a better job"
/r/MensRights20/02/25 02:53 PM
1

When I saw the sentence, First thing popped into my mind: "She is not conventionally attractive"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/25 08:55 PM
1

That wasn't in the bunch I saw over the weekend What did he talk about, was it anything like "I expect to treat women kindly etc etc etc"
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:22 AM
1

Yes it has, GIRLS illicit way more sympathy.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 07:05 PM
25

I hate though, that they have to start off with a qualification that "We aren't trying to ignore male sexual predation" <--- my words not theirs.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 11:56 AM
150

My first weird thought this was "Perhaps they should go after her for child support", then keep her in jail for failure to pay Child Support
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/24 01:04 PM
15

Just saw a followup about how if it were men getting screwed it would have been made into a law, completely forgetting that for a long time men had to wait 5 years longer to collect and since the avg man dies 7 years earlier they will also collect 7 years less.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:51 PM
15

When I read this story, it reminded me (still stings a lot) that I lost a job that I had applied for because the company wanted to achieve gender equality in the tech roles. Problem, there was only 1 tech role, and it was the one I was applying for. This org was small, only 32 people and 30 of them were women and they needed an IT support person, so they put out to hire someone. Since there were 0 women in the IT Support role their 'rules' indicated that they could only hire a woman, iow, their …
/r/MensRights16/12/24 01:17 PM
3

So 1 in 10 women aged 15 - 25 experience sexual assault etc. So this also means 9 out of 10 don't.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:13 PM
1

She is not conventionally attractive so she might get a decent amount of time.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:11 PM
17

I am willing to bet money if you were to have the same graph for every western democracy, it would look exactly like this Here is the data for Canada for 2000 to 2023 Year | Percentage of Women | Percentage of Men 2000 | 52.0% | 48.0% 2001 | 52.5% | 47.5% 2002 | 53.0% | 47.0% 2003 | 53.5% | 46.5% 2004 | 54.0% | 46.0% 2005 | 54.5% | 45.5% 2006 | 55.0% | 45.0% 2007 | 55.5% | 44.5% 2008 | 56.0% | 44.0% 2009 | 56.2% | 43.8% 2010 | 55.2% | 44.8% 2011 | 55.5% | 44.5% 2012 | 55.8% | 44.2% 2013 | 56.0% …
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:52 PM
170

Did they find the nearby man and blame him?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 06:00 PM
9

She was depressed, there's that word again, seems like that the new way to spell mother when used in the context of something a mother did wrong. It's spelled "MOTHER" when used in the context of her doing something good But spelled "DEPRESSED MOTHER" when she does something bad. BTW, was she diagnosed with depression OR is that just the person giving the story's way of describing her.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 09:33 PM
20

I disagree, this sounds like something a lawyer told her to do, IF he were to apologize it would indicate HE did something wrong not her.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:29 PM
5

I knew an OUT and PROUD male feminst, my college professor, he was eventually fired for hooking up with a couple of students.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:00 PM
11

I expected to tell me that "Current US society is very much like HMT" The reason I expect that is because ChatGPT and other AI program "LEAN" very left in their answers and the current prevailing opinion seems to be the US is already at the level of HMT.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:51 PM
-9

The problem is that while I see the /s and understand the sarcasm there are just too many people who would write that with a straight face and mean it.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:20 PM
6

I had a person who worked for me who had a wife who had a court order against her that she could not be alone with the kids (the guy and wife still lived together). She had suicide attempts and had some severe mental health issues. One day someone must have told her to go to a local abuse shelter and get a letter from them and go to an out-of-county courthouse and get a TRO, this allowed her to get him removed from the house, and she was also able to get the social worker 'fired' from her case a…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 05:05 PM
36

Remember , 1: Feminism has become a religion 2 Patriarchy is "Original Sin" therefore you can't escape it.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:54 PM
46

TO THE CHILD: Why does that matter???
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:45 PM
12

For me, it was when I was in my mid-40s and found a lump in my right breast. I went looking for assistance, ALL that was available was a basic doctor, and the only services for people who MIGHT have breast cancer was for WOMEN. Luckily it was only a cyst.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 02:20 PM
2

No, variation across a short timeline.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 10:12 AM
25

So what was the main reason??? seems to me far greater variance of hormones during a short period of time also had something to do with it as well.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 02:33 PM
12

One of the best discussions I have seen on that was on YouTube many years ago where a female lawyer was talking about the gender pay gap. She was the senior partner in a law firm and was asked if everyone at the law firm earned the same as she did. She responded "No, of course not" When asked WHY, she gave a myriad of reasons such as seniority, different types of law being practised etc. The HOST responded, "But your company is the perfect example of people doing the same job, being a lawyer. Of…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:55 AM
3

I don't know what to think of this, but my Google search for "Human trafficking by gender" revealed that the first 3 pages contained sponsored links from organizations soliciting funds.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:04 PM
14

I saw a podcast discuss this well (wish I could remember the link), Though it was No more men ever again. One of the women pointed out that within 24 there would be no power in MOST of the world. A different woman tried to claim that 50% of the power workers are women, a lot of people laughed at her.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 07:58 PM
47

IMHO: Having 80% of board members being male does not indicate they will help boys, all the studies I have seen about Group Bias show both MEN and Women favour women, iow, Men have an outgroup bias and women have an ingroup bias.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:40 PM
4

OR not sentence at all
/r/MensRights16/08/24 07:34 PM
16

4 years, so without looking I am going to say, Not conventionally attractive.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:38 PM
29

Is this happening often enough yet to be called SYSTEMIC Abuse by teachers of students. I mean , it seems while the catholic priest thing was bad, this seems to be a lot more prevalent. It doesn't seem like there is a day or two that goes by without us hearing about this, and since I would bet that a lot more cases are never found, it seems like we should call it either an epidemic or a systemic issue.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 11:56 AM
5

This question is easy to answer "It depends on what the person is trying to prove in that moment when claiming each of these things"
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:31 PM
2

It's not stupidity, it is calculated, see there is an offence problem in society, the DEMAND far outweighs the SUPPLY.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:53 AM
147

This was the best retort for the Bear vs Man argument I have seen. "When you go to the zoo and are walking by the bear enclosure and you see a strange man approaching, Have you ever jumped in the cage with the bear OR did you just keep walking as per normal because you knew you were a lot safer outside the cage"
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:47 PM
31

No, not AC, AC is sexist /s
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:44 PM
94

As Bill Burr said "Women treat equality like a buffer, I want some of that , but none of that"
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:44 PM
6

I believe this is the same woman who wrote an article for the Good Men Project many years ago about how WOMEN are not FATHERS and won't ever be. It got taken down with apologies to all the women out here ON A WEBSITE dedicated to men. (or at least it was supposed to be)
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:47 PM
7

But even that article (satire) gets it wrong, if they really wanted to drive the point home, they should have said, "She will be tried as a male"
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:01 PM
24

I have made the same comment over the years about the RACIST justice system and if it were as bad as people say then Black Women would be sentenced more often and for longer than WHITE men. A few months ago I sent an email to a website talking about the killing of women of colour by police. The website stated that for women of colour the ratio was 8 per 100,000 women of colour. Since there are 42.3 million women of color in the US this would mean that there were approx 3,360 women of colour kill…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 07:43 PM
6

Both, IMHO women have always been less likely to face the consequences of their actions, at least from the justice system.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:06 PM
36

My completely amateur theory is that as women become more powerful in all aspects of society they too begin to abuse that power. The 'women are weaker and better' paradigm is also still in place so their abuse of power is NOT punished or looked down on by society.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:29 PM
3

When I read the headline and read she got 8 years, my immediate reaction was "She is not conventionally attractive"
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:07 PM
8

Context is this. Whenever I have seen an article about TM, the reason given for it being bad almost always seems to be how it negatively affects women/girls. The same thing for toxic femininity, the reason given for why it is bad is because of how it negatively affects women/girls.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 10:10 AM
10

It really was and is terrible.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 08:51 PM
29

I have only fully opened up to my wife ONCE in our 39 year marriage and I mean telling her a secret that no one else knew. When I was a teenager (13) I was sexually assaulted by a older (mid 30s , as I remember) where she got me drunk etc etc, you know the story I told my wife about it ONCE and since that time period, she has slapped me in the face with it several times during arguments. Never again will I open up like that.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 07:26 PM
3

I hope you don't have a bad back.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 06:52 PM
12

Think about what would happen if they were to find out their baby was switched at birth: KA-CHING is what happens, millions of dollars to cover the pain and suffering.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:20 PM
13

If you want to find bias in ChatGPT, talk to it about anything relating to DV, Rape, or the "Gender Pay Gap"
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:47 PM
106

I truly believe that this has always gone on but it's just that more boys (and girls) are coming forward to authorities. I am old and when I was in school there was one teacher ( a nun ) who was having sex with a young (13-year-old) student. She got caught and was (just like the priests) sent away to another convent.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:11 PM
16

Not sure if you have seen this but There is a video of a young woman being interviewed and asked if she thinks men and women are equal. She responded in typical fashion that women are better, because men bring nothing to the world. When asked what women bring to the world the ONLY thing she can think of is "VIBES" , I kid you not The guy tried to explain that men build, maintain and run almost all the infrastructure in the world to which she replied "I love the way you are mansplaining that to m…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:56 PM
24

/sarcasm ahead 3 out of 4 suicides are men, what a funny way of saying 1 in 4 are women like most of the rest of the world would write the article.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:54 PM
2

In the docs I have seen over the years, I have seen daycare workers (mostly women) lumped into this "women spend more time with children" too.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:20 AM
12

A few months ago I asked CHATGPT "What rights do men have in the West that women don't", it gave a bunch of stuff, none of which were RIGHTS, like "Women don't feel safe walking alone at night". I said that back to Chatgpt. After much back and forth, it finally had to acknowledge that there aren't any BUT much to my surprise, it gave a dozen or so that WOMEN have that MEN don't like. "Women can't be charged with rape in several countries" "If a woman kills her infant she has the right to be char…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:36 PM
2

Google for example didn't have a special front page graphic for Father's day, or at least it didn't when I checked yesterday morning but it did have one for Mother's day and IMHO that says a lot.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 09:29 AM
15

So what???, MOST men couldn't vote for most of history. You do realize that you are making the point for the OP.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 01:42 PM
30

Whenever people talk about universal suffrage, they ONLY talk about women and how "Not long ago" women couldn't vote. That "Not long ago" is now well over 100 years in the US and this chart is showing that "not long ago" most men couldn't vote either.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:09 PM
17

Mens Lib is the Reddit equivalent of "The Good Men Project", look it up on Google.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:29 PM
31

And since she is not conventionally attractive, she will probably get a decent amount of time if convicted
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:25 PM
7

I never said they did. Learn to follow
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:20 PM
7

It includes Arab men in the same way that "2000 people killed in the war in Ukraine including 3 women" includes 1997 men The best way I have responded to YOUR assertion was when I responded to someone who typed "Kill all men" say "Does that include people to Rodney King or George Floyd"
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:00 PM
5

What I find 'funny' is that IF a hospital screws up and switches a baby at birth the parents are entitled to millions of dollars, if a woman lies about it, nothing is done.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 06:45 PM
23

How much of that is the SAFETY NET called Alimony
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:18 PM
27

I had someone say that a while ago. So I asked "Would you have said that 10 years ago" "She said YES" My response "even George Floyd"
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:29 PM
4

I was told this info by a person with a PhD in mathematics. The danger of using percentages to solve a problem is that normally there will be 4 solutions, 3 of which will help NO ONE but will solve the problem and 1 that will only help a very small percentage of the victims Take the stats showing victimization rates in men's and women's prisons The problem as defined by using percentages "Women are more likely to be victims of sexual victimization in prison" There are 4 solutions In no particula…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:02 PM
6

Also IMHO, she is NOT conventionally attractive. I think that has A LOT to do with it.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:00 PM
2

Referencing the headline: What a funny way of saying that 4% of those killed by Iran are women. We must invade now /s
/r/MensRights15/05/24 08:22 PM
2

That's how it works if the abuser is a MAN.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:31 PM
1

I have seen so many 'interviews' with these young women (and some men) and MOST of them have no idea who HAMAS is, No idea of the history of the region, basically "I love HAMAS" but no idea WHY they love HAMAS. Just following the crowd, virtue signalling at its finest.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 01:54 PM
17

Because they didn't vote for EQUAL voting rights, MEN got universal voting rights by agreeing to fight for their country in a time of war, WOMEN got them without that requirement therefore their voting rights are not equal
/r/MensRights09/05/24 02:27 PM
7

So at what stage does the media write an all-encompassing story calling this an epidemic?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:06 PM
8

I would say it's Apples to Elephants (or bear)
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:24 PM
10

OK< Now compare that to how many MEN women encounter on any given day and you will see the complete silliness of this "It's safer with a bear"
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:24 PM
13

Sure pretty common in SOME areas. The stats say that there are about 340,000 bears in the US. That is a fairly small amount.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:31 PM
19

Your situation is the main issue I have with any of these DEI initiatives, When do they STOP and IMHO they don't stop until it's 100% women. I am certain in your company there were already depts that heavily leaned towards women (HR for example) and yet NONE of those depts were put under the DEI microscope to level it up a bit. What I feel is wrong is that the people benefitting from those policies ARE NOT the same people who were discriminated against in the past they only have characteristics …
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:04 PM
22

I feel stupid even having to say this but someone on my Facebook feed posted this stupid bear thing yesterday. "The reason bear attacks are so low is that people don't go near bears all that often, in this scenario you are GOING to be going near a bear and it is going to feel threatened, so if all women were to go near a bear, millions would be killed"
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:05 PM
1

I have often wondered about the ratio of these teachers to catholic priests. Who does it more????
/r/MensRights24/04/24 07:19 PM
13

I am not an expert but isn't the difference within a normal margin of error, after all the difference isn't really very much, it's .23%
/r/MensRights23/04/24 12:18 PM
4

I don't think people understand why this is happening so often. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unenforced_law This IMHO is what is happening so that one day they will get rid of women going to jail PERIOD.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 03:30 PM
13

At my work we get the MSN news page as our front page: on the page every day are dozens of financial advice websites (ads), and every single one of them, every single day are questions being asked by women on how to squirrel away money from their husbands. Things like "My husband is going to get an inheritance, can I guarantee I get some in a divorce", questions like that, It's amazing.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 02:13 PM
3

What you are talking about is trickle-down empathy, and frankly, it never works.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:39 PM
9

When I googled that the first entry was Female Murder Victims and Victim-Offender Relationship, 2021
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:49 PM
6

No, the bias is that I asked for murder rates under 18 and it only gave me stats on women and girls. Even though boys/men are 3 x as likely to be victims of murder in Canada
/r/MensRights11/04/24 05:36 PM
2

That is very true.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:09 AM
69

I will comment on the "They get custody if they ask for it", I remember reading the study this came from many years ago. The problem is they equate "visitation" == "Custody". So yes it is true that men get visitation when they ask for it BUT what the study failed to check on, do they get 50/50 'custody', ie Do they get equal time with the kids that 64% of the time, NO they don't. What's worse in areas that base child support on the amount of visitation, men are far less likely to get close to th…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 10:48 AM
18

Actually they don't have that right. Look up the cases where sex was FORCED on a boy, iow , he had no choice and yet was forced to pay for the child.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:47 PM
126

There is an old joke that I remember that says "No woman has ever taken a millionaire and made him into a billionaire, but plenty have taken a billionaire and made him into a millionaire"
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:11 PM
12

And don't forget PAY MORE CHILD SUPPORT to MOM, Not to the child but to MOM.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 03:33 PM
10

That is correct: But the LIE that is the wage gap is harder to kill than a vampire.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:32 PM
22

I read that the other day when someone posted it on FB. I wrote this response "Is this 16% wrong though, if you look at the stats that produced this number you will see that it isn't for the same work or even in the same industry, it's across the board for full-time workers. You know what else, MEN work 13% longer hours across the board. That leaves only a 3% difference, which can be accounted for in other ways, e.g. since men work more hours they also have more experience when they look for a j…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 05:11 PM
3

Pretty much the poster child for Male Feminists
/r/MensRights21/03/24 08:26 PM
3

His YouTube channel is called "Bad Bad BabyDad"
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:56 PM
1

Thanks, that's what I have been doing, I guess it takes a while for it to stop.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:24 PM
2

That's exactly the issue I am having now. I am getting lots of Anti-Father content because of this too.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:13 PM
1

My wife was shocked that Holmes actually got ANY jail time at all, after all, a mother of 2, very pretty and used the abuse excuse.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:17 AM
1

Right and so because of this SHE should get a longer sentence, my point is though she won't.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:18 PM
5

Except HE didn't know what was going on with the kid, SHE did. If you are going to nitpick this, there is NO crime that can be used then.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:01 PM
15

I have not seen him at the patriarchy meetings so I don't think his dues are paid up though.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:47 PM
7

:)
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:18 PM
17

From what I have read, the mom knew a lot more about what was going on, which in theory should make her more culpable but I doubt it will.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:17 PM
1

As I said in another post, that post was saying that true equal pay is ONLY achievable by that unrealistic scenario.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 09:57 PM
2

I think people completely misunderstood what I was saying, I am saying "it's impossible for the gender pay gap to be zero all the time" except in the highly unrealistic scenario I gave.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:25 PM
1

except a lot of people have worked for companies since before they said gender. Plus gender might also 'change' and people probably don't update those forms
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:11 PM
1

except gender and sex are not the same thing (or so we have been told) therefore, we don't know the gender of every worker, in fact, we probably don't know the gender of hardly any workers.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:30 PM
0

I am not suggesting it, I am saying it's the only way it's possible: If we give people a choice they will NOT choose the same things as 'we' want them to achieve the almighty equal gender pay.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:25 PM
1

pretty sure we have entered sex until recently
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:21 PM
1

IMHO the only fix for the gender wage gap is 1) All jobs pay exactly the same 2) Equal number of women and men working that's the ONLY way.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:04 PM
1

I never said it didn't exist, I said it would be near impossible to determine the gender of each worker unless you ask them directly.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 03:51 PM
50

It's the same all over: It happened when "being a victim' became a way to obtain social power or even lots of money.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 02:52 PM
0

His wife is divorcing him because she wants to start a foundation of some sort and if she is still married to the PM she won't be able to get any money from the federal government because of COI laws.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 10:29 AM
1

Yup, usually that's the case
/r/MensRights16/02/24 03:38 PM
3

Or how about this Jack gets a salary of 60,000 a year, Jill gets 55,000 per year. Jack works 60 hours a week, Jill works 35 hours per week jack thus makes $19.20 a hour Jill makes $30.25 an hour BUT people only see that Jack makes more money BUT far less per hour. Some of the 'studies' also normalize it to a 40 hour work week which means jack makes $28.80 per hour jill makes $26.44 per hour OMG There is a wage gap
/r/MensRights16/02/24 02:56 PM
8

To the OP, be careful or you will be called a Pick Me Girl.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 02:43 PM
42

Isn't that because so many more men are dead?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:58 PM
2

There is a less common 'definition' of these as well, they are called Weasel Words
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:06 AM
3

It depends on where you live if it is even statutory rape, but you never said anything about stat rape only RAPE> make up your mind
/r/MensRights05/02/24 05:16 PM
8

Are you Cathy Newman in real life? Where did I say anything about a girl being raped????? BTW if a boy is raped by a woman they are FORCED to become a father and pay child support, now there is a real double standard.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:53 PM
12

I love how you went immediately to "you are a pro pedo" Deciding when and who to have sex with is ALSO having a right to her own body: That's the double standard.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 01:55 PM
7

There is a lot of stuff that is a double standard when it comes to sex. e.g. A 14-year-old girl has sex with a 20-year-old, the 20-year-old committed a crime because as the story goes the girl was too young to consent, unfort the girl became pregnant and the law says she is old enough to get an abortion without parental consent.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 01:16 PM
38

Actually, your honour what you stated is the definition of an excuse a reason or explanation put forward to defend or justify a fault or offense. That's right from the dictionary.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:33 PM
2

except in the show she sleeps with him again AFTER she finds out his actual age.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 05:07 PM
15

Correct BUT she also slept with him knowing he was 17 too, after she found out. So there is every reason to believe his age would not have stopped her.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 05:00 PM
6

I take a different tact on this Let's assume that the 2% number is accurate and correct, let's look at another scenario: let's assume that 2% of women who report a SA are murdered by the person they accuse, would ANYONE say that those are rare, or would there be a national emergency declared and that the problem must be solved. How about this one: What would a city do if 2% of people using a particular crosswalk were hit and killed, would it just be treated as rare?
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:04 PM
2

I have heard this before and the best response I have seen "Ok fine , women can multitask much better than men, but would you rather ONE task get done right or 3 tasks get done half-ass"
/r/MensRights29/01/24 01:39 PM
9

Without reading the article (perhaps it's covered in there) where is the nearest man they can blame, perhaps the father?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:49 PM
1

And they would not have been nominated for the same award.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 12:13 PM
40

I love the statement "Ask a woman to describe a good man, and she will describe a slave"
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:01 PM
3

MensLib is reddits answer to "The Good Men Project"
/r/MensRights23/01/24 01:33 PM
4

Here is one such example https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/diversity-uk-boards#:~:text=Companies%20subject%20to%20the%20new,held%20by%20a%20woman%3B%20and Have a google for the rest "Equal number of women on company boards"
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:31 PM
9

So then where are all the laws requiring that bricklayers, construction worker etc and all the other hard jobs MUST be 50/50 , because we sure are getting laws that say that the C suite must be 50/50 or that CEOs, and other high execs must be 50/50
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:54 PM
0

AND more than likely that CS is tax-free.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:11 AM
10

No idea: I just happen to live in the west and have visited many western countries
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:52 PM
59

I remember reading that and thinking: IF that were true, men (the fathers) could force a woman to have an abortion OR to keep the child and YET we can't. In fact in the west men have ZERO reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 12:09 PM
39

Notice she immediately went to the 'baby' voice when talking.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/24 11:20 AM
2

I don't think watering it down is correct in this context. Here is the definition of it. altered so as to be weaker in force, content, or value. What feminism is doing is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 10:33 AM
6

She didn't. She just deleted the post.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:46 AM
24

How did they know that the people they were referring to were WOMEN or MEN?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 06:30 PM
134

So I saw a Meme recently on the FB page of a person I know, she is an out and proud feminist who on more than one occasion has said that she believes she and all other women in the West are oppressed by society. The Meme: Men think they have all the power but in reality, power comes from the socket, not the plug I asked her what that meant and she said that women really control all the major things in the West. Things like voting bloc, access to sex, and spending most of the money. So I asked he…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 04:34 PM
3

The issues I have with these diversity hires etc are 1) the people who are helped are NOT the people who were hurt by the older policies/processes 2) the people who are hurt are NOT the people who were helped by the old policies/processes 3) When does it end: We have seen on college campuses that women are not the majority of students and quickly becoming the vast majority and there is no end in sight.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:59 PM
30

There is also I don't need no man but "I want Alimony" and "I want the man to pay for dates"
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:57 PM
1

Why Aziz Ansari: from what I read about him the 'charges' against him were that she expected him to be a certain way and he wasn't. It was a BAD date from her perspective.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 06:28 PM
7

While not involved in Gamergate afaik: Don't forget the biggest one of all, Hugo Schwyzer.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 01:02 AM
1

That's an interesting question. I wonder, do you feel the same way when an abortion happens and someone tries to claim it wasn't a child?
/r/MensRights08/12/23 10:08 AM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 08:19 PM
1

Perhaps not medical decisions but you do get to make decisions on his body in other ways: e.g. IF (notice I said IF) you change your mind about carrying a pregnancy to term, you get to decide alone that he will have to work (and therefore use his body) to support a decision that you alone made.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:05 PM
2

Actually having an abortion is abdicating responsibilty
/r/MensRights07/12/23 02:22 PM
2

Having an abortion is NOT taking responsibility: and if they CHOOSE to have the child, that IS taking responsibility BUT it's their choice not forced upon them.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:45 PM
104

Is this another example of a media outlet using glamour shots in their story instead of a mug shot when it's a woman?
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:42 PM
1

And does this apply to women: after all, wouldn't that sentiment eliminate the need for abortion (except in the cases of rape)
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:38 PM
2

Does this apply to all, I wonder
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:15 PM
-5

Except that ONLY one person decides if it is alive or not, the woman (as it should be) .
/r/MensRights06/12/23 06:29 PM
20

When feminists talk about equality what they mean is "There should be the same number of women in the cushy, air-conditioned offices as men are working in the sewers"
/r/MensRights04/12/23 07:39 PM
9

Let's assume for the sake of discussion that it costs her 2 mil a year to raise these kids: of course it doesn't but indulge me. This means she gets to keep 400k a year AND she doesn't have to spend ANY of her own money to raise the kids. Aren't feminists constantly saying both parents are responsible to support their kids financially
/r/MensRights01/12/23 08:10 PM
6

Fighting discrimination by using discrimination is like fighting a forest fire by dousing it with gasoline.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:09 PM
2

That sounds like PRE-NUP and there is tons of cases where they were thrown out.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:58 PM
3

Does this attitude also apply to when the baby is born and the mother demands that that father use his body to earn money that is given to her to support the choice only she gets to make???
/r/MensRights27/11/23 11:16 PM
4

This is being done to close the Gang leader gap in the UK, this will allow gangs to have a woman leader and when the gang gets in trouble the women will step up and say "I am the leader, I am responsible"
/r/MensRights21/11/23 10:17 AM
5

I can only speak for myself: I would love if my wife got up earlyish and cooked me breakfast in bed: YES I Know then made me some lunch And then made me my favourite meal for supper I do most of the cooking in our house.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:12 PM
12

I don't think it was on purpose: I believe she got more excited about helping plan my cousins that it completely slipped her mind
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:11 PM
20

I wouldn't let her as much as she tried. I am 61 and I still choke up thinking about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 05:18 PM
65

When I was 10 my mom forgot my birthday in the worst way possible I have a cousin who has the same birthday: When I got home from school my mom told me we were going over to my cousin's for a party: AWESOME I thought, a birthday party for both of us. Didn't mind that until later on when I realized that it was only for my cousin and nothing for me. When I was going to bed that night I asked my mom, "Why didn't I get anything for my birthday" the look on her face when she realized she had forgotte…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 02:20 PM
46

It's more than IMHO: If all the men walked off the job (and I mean ALL men), society would suffer severely, Police, Firefighters, sewage workers, water workers, electrical plant workers etc: these are jobs that society requires to work.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:57 AM
12

That's why the saying is "Women and Children" and women come first in that saying.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 10:40 AM
41

IMHO this is why alimony is being looked at NOW and not 50 years ago because people can see the writing on the wall. When alimony laws are re-written you will find 'special' wording being put in that will apply to women payers more than men that will allow them to pay less.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:22 PM
12

Also, remember the pay gap in the age range of 18 - 30 is actually reversed somewhat, last I saw women in that range make 105% of what men make, the issue is that older women, who have less experience, education etc than men in their age range don't make as much for very good reasons but of course when feminists take about the wage gap they use all women. It's very much like 'black people killed by police use all black people even though 95% of black people killed by police are men"
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:47 PM
4

IMHO: this all comes down to one notion "Boys are just broken girls", if they were more like girls everything would be just fine <--- never mind that girls are pretty screwed up too.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:17 PM
5

How does that justify her groping a young boy and getting NOT time in jail for it.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 08:57 PM
6

I misspoke: he TRIED to take his own life: which really is only a small difference.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 06:35 PM
4

The guy committed suicide after what she did and of course, the judge threw the book at her, and gave her 25 years to life. Oh, OH WAIT, no they didn't they gave her a suspended sentence.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:05 PM
2

Exactly: and your insurance example is good because when it's HEALTH insurance which has women more of a risk, feminists are all about "It's discrimination"
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:25 PM
2

It has always been my opinion that the reason Parent Alienation is so 'controversial' is because it is MOSTLY done by mothers because they have a lot more access to the kids to do this.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 05:28 PM
19

I love the saying "A woman will never make a millionaire a billionaire but they are more than capable of making a billionaire a millionaire"
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:40 PM
6

I love how their first reason is "Women work fewer hours" and somehow that is seen as "BAD" and they really should be still making the same money.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:55 PM
2

I know and as far as I can tell, it's also very accurate, he doesn't 'fudge' the numbers to make it work
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:38 PM
5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA8djGrsttA This is a good video that I believe explains it.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:46 AM
9

Some jurisdictions have a formula to calculate it with 3 parameters 1) Retraction of the accusation with an admission of lying 2) Physical evidence that no rape occurred 3) Eyewitness that no rape occurred.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:26 AM
13

Here is why IMHO Marriage does not fit the definition of a contract Imagine you are a lawyer: You hire a person who cleans the offices, and cooks for the people there. You pay them $25 an hour and they work 10 hours a day for 4 days a week. In your contract with them, you set forth a severance package that if they leave they will get 1 month's salary for each year they are on the job PLUS a $10k bonus. They have been with the company for 12 years. They decide to leave. You give them their 1-year…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:47 PM
1

when you go to www.reddit.com , what posts show up there
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:09 AM
4

Please "Get down off the cross, someone needs the wood"
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:11 PM
5

Maybe you should be more specific then.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:10 PM
6

Oh please provide this PROOF
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:09 PM
8

No, it really isn't. In almost every category that exists, men are falling behind, education, life expectancy, suicide, job injuries, murder victims, crime victims.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:09 PM
20

Says the person who claims that "Society loves men", if they do, I can't wait until society starts hating us.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:38 PM
2

Philosophically , yes it is , Legally NO, probably not
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:48 PM
7

You are correct of course, but it won't ever happen.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:05 PM
19

It's simple: Being a victim carries social power and you gain social capital through empathy from others. If your response in any way(AND I do mean ANY WAY) reduces that social capital, you will be attacked. To those people, it would be the same as you trying to steal their money.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 02:39 PM
1

Many serial killers have abducted women during dates. Where did you get this info: Lets take the US as an example: there are 300million people in the US, assuming half of them are men and assuming all serial killers are men, What percentage of men are serial killers and HOW many of those serial killers abducted women while on dates , and for a side note: Serial killers victims are almost evenly split between MEN and WOMEN:
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:10 AM
3

What this person did is compare the most brutal form of FGM to the mildest form of MGM. It's like comparing crimes by comparing jaywalking to murder.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:24 PM
9

You are a police officer: you say to a citizen, if you don't have sex with me I will arrest you and ruin your life: Is this rape?? You are a university prof: you say that if you don't have sex with me I will fail you and ruin your life: Is this rape? People will answer YES to both of those examples. Now ask: You are a woman and you say, have sex with me OR I tell everyone you raped me and ruin your life.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:52 PM
9

AND your last sentence is exactly WHAT it has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:12 AM
3

there are tons of videos on tiktok and yt, showing that and even giving tips on how to 'get away with it'. e.g. there are bars and restaurants that have a safety drink, if the woman says the magic words or orders the magic drink, the waiter will escort them out safely and put them in a cab. So now what happens when the guy says "We will split the bill" they say the safety word and get escorted out.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:26 PM
4

A song by Oliver Anthony called "Rich Men North of Richmond" fits this perfectly.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 10:14 AM
8

haven't we been today for several generations now that there is no such thing as a female brain and a male brain?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:48 AM
2

I think this so-called STUDY is a perfect example of Advocacy research:
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:30 PM
2

I could be wrong but I believe this is called a Base Rate Fallacy.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:56 PM
6

According to labour stats, 54.7% of women over the age of 18 work, BUT not all work full-time, so I don't think your assertion that most women work full-time is correct. ** Since 1990, the employment rate of women in the United States has stayed more or less steady, reaching a peak of 57.5 percent in 2000. In 1990, the female employment rate was 54.3 percent, and in 2022, the employment rate was 54.7, failing to return to pre-pandemic levels for a second year in a row.**
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:16 PM
2

The current trend is more and more women who work full time and won't be able to automatically 'claim' the kids on divorce and won't be automatically able to claim alimony on divorce which is why more and more areas are getting rid of it.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:09 PM
5

Whenever I see a story like this, I recall a discussion I had many years ago with a buddy of mine who said "There could be a man jumping off a building, and on the way down, he hits another man killing him instantly, a few more stories and he hits two more men killing them. When he hits the ground he lands on and kills two more men. Across the street, there is a woman who sees the whole thing. The headline in the local paper reads "Local woman traumatized by suicidal man, men should think about …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:21 PM
4

I have often wondered: Has there every been a case where a woman donated eggs and was ultimately sued for CS?
/r/MensRights21/07/23 07:50 PM
25

I guess the old "Both parents are responsible for financially supporting their children" goes right out the window when it comes to men who have a few dollars in their pockets.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 09:34 PM
16

excellent point and as homer simpson would say, it's funny because it's true.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 05:47 PM
28

Imagine the following scenario You are a lawyer and have decided to start your own law firm. You interview a new fresh out of law school associate. You ask the following question as your last question 1) What do you expect from this job and becoming a lawyer at my firm. Answer: I want to only work as often as I want, no more. I want at least 1/2 of all income coming into the firm including all benefits and I want to choose any responsibilities that I might have. If I decide to leave the law firm…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:41 PM
3

Talk to any woman who has worked with women, they will tell you just how toxic other women can be and ARE.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:21 PM
30

I read an article some time ago comparing Toxic Masculinity and Toxic Feminity: the article was trash BUT it amused me because both TM and TF were framed in exactly the same light, "How the behaviours affected women"
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:39 AM
1

You need more google foo. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/life-events/birth-adoption/adoptions/adoption-reunions-registries/birth-parents-registry That'st he first link from GOOGLE
/r/MensRights29/06/23 09:25 AM
1

Just do a google search for Putative father registry in Canada
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:14 PM
2

You have to do more reading. There are plenty of cases where an adoption has taken place without the father even knowing about it, let alone giving consent. Putative father registries were designed (in theory) to eliminate this but have had the opposite effect and some (like me) would say that in fact this was in fact their intended effect.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:34 AM
4

Here in Canada, these two laws discriminate against men. I will give you scenario(s) 1) A person drugs another person and has sex with them, as a result of this sex (sexual assault has been committed, legally in Canada, there is no rape law) a baby is conceived. If the person doing the drugging is a man, the woman will have several choices prescribed by the law a) She can have an abortion, and the man can't stop her. b) She can have the baby and give it up for adoption and the man can't stop her…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 10:14 PM
6

So I saw that same post about the Navy: Did you pick up on the stats she used to 1 in 3 Navy women vs 1 in 5 Navy men: the issue I have is this: there are 5 times as many Navy men as women, this means that there are WAY more navy men who are raped as navy women but she picked 'percentages' to make it seem as though it's a bigger problem for navy women.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 04:34 PM
22

Imagine the outcry if a man were to get his sentence reduced to 1 year like this.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:47 PM
36

Can you please provide a link to a social experiment that shows that people come to the aid of MEN but not Women? I'll wait.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 12:59 PM
3

I was just about to say the same thing...
/r/MensRights13/06/23 10:15 PM
6

Which races was he prejudiced against? Jewish People and Muslims are not members of a race but members of a religion.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:57 PM
56

And when Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates were married, their money was counted as MEN's money, yet as we all know, it turned out that roughly half of it was also Women's money.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:37 AM
3

Here is my thought Imagine a justice system without misogyny, that would mean that men would get 200% longer sentences, not 63% and that 127% of people in jail would be men. The ONLY reason any woman goes to jail is because society hates women. /s
/r/MensRights08/06/23 07:04 PM
18

If you want to see a manipulation of statistics to take something that affects way more men and yet make it seem like it affects women more, here is an excellent example https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/08/27/murder-is-second-most-likely-way-for-women-to-die-at-work/ Just a note, more men are murdered at work than women who die from all other causes combined.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:31 PM
18

And they will take the child "Just in case","Better safe than sorry"
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:48 PM
32

So far, a happy ending. I hope I am wrong, but I fear the mother will return and now want the child back.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 11:23 AM
8

/sarcasm ahead Your headline sure is a funny way of saying that 7% of the prison population is women.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 10:30 PM
2

BUT ONLY if the woman is on the right side of the political divide, i.e. A democrat in the US or a Liberal in Canada. Look at what happened to the women who accused Bill Clinton or more recently Joe Biden.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 01:24 PM
2

This was just a FB friend, not a girlfriend/wife
/r/MensRights30/05/23 01:20 PM
4

The problem is this, If a man fails to support his children financially, he can be thrown in jail. If a woman does it, she can rely on the state to do it for her.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:13 PM
3

They did the same thing in Canada
/r/MensRights29/05/23 04:00 PM
2

Now imagine for a second if there were a law or laws that had as a result women getting 60% more time in prison: there would be a national inquiry into WHY.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:58 PM
-1

I am on the right and I don't believe any of the thing you espouse to me and people like me.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:10 PM
4

That's part of the sentencing gap, MEN are also charged with MORE crimes than women.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:30 AM
3

What they never seem to ask "Is true equality a good thing". e.g. The government decides to give everyone a new pair of shoes each year for 'free'. So they do, and they do it Each person gets a pair of Size 9, black, wing tip shoes. Everyone gets the same. That's true equality.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 10:26 AM
6

I just got an email from ETSY asking me if I wanted to NOT receive any emails from them on Father's day because fathers day can be so difficult, I received no such email near mothers day.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:35 PM
11

Would you be asking this question if it were a daughter?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:33 PM
56

I was a senior supervisor in the military. I had a subordinate who was the primary caregiver for his kids. His wife was not allowed (legally) to be alone with them due to suicide attempts and other mental health issues. She decides one day that she wants out of the marriage, and instead of going to a lawyer, she goes to a local woman's shelter and gets a letter from them declaring her mother of the year material; she takes that letter and goes to a judge in another area of the province and recei…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:53 PM
6

I mean, she did virtually the same thing as Bernie Madoff; I wonder if there are any puff pieces at the NYT about him.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 10:58 AM
9

What bothers me the most about the people who make these laws is that they are the same people extolling just how privileged men are and that women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 05:02 PM
7

Not all forms of FGM are worse than all forms of circumcision. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:53 AM
9

Here's the problem, most things are a zero-sum game. You give to one group you have to take away from another, jobs as an example And here is the kicker The people you are giving this stuff to were NOT the ones who were discriminated against; they only share a biological characteristic with those who were. IOW, women in theory were discriminated against and now other women will reap the benefits.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 09:24 AM
6

So what???
/r/MensRights14/04/23 10:03 AM
5

So what. Do you think the number of people of any gender in Parliament matters? The ONLY thing that matters is the politics of the PM; that's it and nothing else. In Canada, if you don't follow the party, your career is sover, so almost no one ever goes against the party. The Parliament could be 90% women. If the PM wants something, he gets it.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 09:36 AM
8

It is funny how it says that a matriarchy would allow people to be judged based on their individual characteristics. (paraphrasing) As we move more towards so-called equality, we are moving further and further away from individual characteristics and way more towards GROUP identity.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 09:35 AM
1

You need to look around at his videos; he tells people in several of them that they are satire and he is making fun of girls.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 04:51 PM
6

For me, the problem is the person: He did a series of videos that even he said were parodies. IOW, making fun of girls. Then he became a GIRL, not a woman, a GIRL, then he dressed like a 14-year-old girl and acted like a 14-year-old girl. The ad essentially features a scantily clad, 14-year-old girl.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 10:19 AM
19

I was in school 50 years ago, and there was bias against boys back then too, NOT against girls.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 05:27 PM
2

AND this is the future, already primed with 'woke' answers and 'some animals are more equal than others' I have even tried having a conversation about equal pay and holy crap was it frustrating.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:11 PM
2

Haven't tried it in a week or so but another one to try is Tell me a joke about fat men or just men and then Tell me a joke about fat women or just women.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:04 PM
6

I just did what you did and got the same answers. This is sad on som many levels.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:02 PM
2

OR Teenage boy seduces older woman.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 10:24 AM
21

I had a discussion some time ago with a friend about this. She was very passionate about the ISSUE of equal pay in men's and women's sports. So I asked her to name three male players in basketball, and she could do it within seconds; when I asked her for three women's basketball players, she could not name one correctly, though she did badly pronounce the lady who was jailed in Russia. I told her she was passionate about the issue, BUT even she didn't support women's sports enough to know one na…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 04:07 PM
3

You don't understand that stats. Anyone that kills a woman will receive a longer sentence on average than someone who kills a man.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:25 AM
1

What if I asked you to find one (or more) with reversed genders? Would it be this difficult to find one?
/r/MensRights02/04/23 10:28 AM
1

That's the point of this question: It is hard to find a movie that fits my description YET, but if I were to ask for a movie/tv show where a father abuses his child, and the hero comes and rescues the child, there are 100s of them.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:31 PM
1

will look up that movie
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:14 AM
2

Good example: but does the hero of the movie step in to save the children from the mother?
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:49 AM
4

Thanks, folks, for all the answers; very few met all the criteria I asked for where an abusive mother and the 'hero' steps in to save the child. NOW what would happen if I said, abusive father, hero steps in. there would be thousands of replies. That IMHO, speaks a lot of about Hollywood and its portrayal of abusive women.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:37 AM
11

You need to get out more if you think there are people that don't think like this.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 09:28 PM
27

Since it's a female shooter, there won't be any searches to see if she posts in various feminist forums, ala TWOx etc. And, of course, her history will be combed for some male that did her wrong so that person can be blamed.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:06 PM
29

I wonder if she posts on TwoX, and would anyone point that out if she did?
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:16 PM
4

Maybe the Trad Wives movement is a feminist thing. WHY??? If there are enough Trad Wives, the system will adjust the new and upcoming laws around divorce. More and more places are getting rid of or severely reducing Alimony. This may be a way to get the system to keep it.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 05:35 PM
27

Perhaps what you don't realize is that these shows are set up to make the action of the woman FULLY FULLY FULLY justified.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:13 PM
4

Did you hear about the director that had to change the gender of the first victim in his movie because the studio (Netflix) told him they didn't want to have a female victim so soon into the film? So he changed it, of course, AND he stated that WAY more men die and are attacked in his movies than women, but that didn't matter. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-neil-cross-changed-gender-193020722.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK5nLsdY2xUTSSqdv…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 10:51 PM
14

For me, this stuff proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we DON'T live in a rape culture , if we did these people would never think to falsely accuse someone because they know it would not hurt them so there would be no point. It's like "Why doesn't anyone ever get falsely accused of jaywalking"
/r/MensRights16/03/23 11:13 AM
3

You missed the biggest one of all, at least as far as the internet is concerned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:30 PM
44

For at least a dozen years, I have noticed that all cop/detective show follow this pattern. If the victim is male, they will be a "BAD" man, a drug dealer, an abuser etc. I haven't seen an innocent dead male victim in a long time. If the victim is female, they will be very innocent.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:25 PM
21

That was a lot of excuses for mothers abusing their children; well done, that's the most I have seen in a single post. Did you have those excuses ready? BTW do you have any proof that what you posted constitutes causation vs correlation?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:03 PM
2

With the number of hateful DMs I have gotten for this post, it looks like I hit a nerve for some.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:46 PM
2

Troll...
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:45 PM
1

Seriously 40 mins to put away a load of laundry,
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:47 PM
2

Never said she was a maid: I do 40 hours a week, making sure WE have a home. She doesn't work anywhere near that.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:23 PM
1

Yes, several hobbies. She does needlepoint with her best friend, swims twice a week (membership at the local gym), coffee several days a week
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:47 PM
2

I don't hate my wife. This was a conversation we had that frustrated me to no end.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 01:51 PM
3

Then don't try and say "Not trying to be mean"
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:58 PM
3

No, you were trying to be "mean' by basically calling me a liar. That's like starting a conversation with "I don't mean to be racist, but" followed by something every racist.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:47 PM
3

You can believe whatever you want. Doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:30 PM
13

You claim she wants equality: the problem is that for equality, she would have to do MORE work, NOT less.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:33 PM
13

So it really is a feminist bot.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:37 AM
8

I think they might have changed it but. Last week I typed "Tell me a joke about men" and got a joke making fun of men but when I typed "Tell me a joke about women," it told me that it doesn't belive in generalizing about gender.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:06 PM
4

AND IMHO, no they wouldn't. You can bet the ERA would somehow be written to allow "THAT" type of discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 09:50 PM
49

Just one more step towards them making the law unenforceable. AND then women won't go to jail for anything. Then there will be a BOOM in gangs being led by women, drug dealers will all be women (in name only)
/r/MensRights20/02/23 03:54 PM
5

This is part of the plan: Keep passing sentences like this, and eventually, someone will make an appeal that since judges don't send women to prison anyway, they will get rid of women's prisons.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:22 PM
1

Link, please.....
/r/MensRights16/02/23 10:26 AM
2

You sound like the UN who said the same thing UNTIL Elon Musk told them he would sell his shares in Tesla to fund 'feeding the world', and all the UN had to do was come up with an actual plan above just merely saying it. SILENCE INSUED.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:49 AM
2

People are offended by the fact that "It's offensive to make a joke about women according to the AI, but NOT offensive to make a joke about men"
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:08 PM
5

What the fuck are you talking about. You changed the numbers as given to try and prove some point. Why double the number: the numbers in REAL LIFE aren't double what I posted. Could you tell me what the point you are trying to make is??? <== rhetorical question, don't bother answering, won't be responding to you troll posts any longer
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:43 PM
8

How about coming out and saying what is wrong with it math-wise instead of trying to play sneaky little childish games?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:32 PM
6

There is no way to know that; increasing the number of women does not automatically mean that the same percentage will be assaulted. OR are you trying to do a WHAT IF but keep everything else the same which is disingenuous at best.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:25 PM
10

Please explain HOW math works??? At the time there were appox 6000 women in the CF, and approx 48,000 men So 4.3% of women were sexually assaulted --> 258 women 1.1% of men were sexually assaulted --> 528 men There's the math for you
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:09 PM
3

While I agree there are people who do what you say Want to know what it different and also VERY important about this sub. "You are allowed to say it without getting downvoted or banned". That is no small thing.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:44 PM
62

MensLib is simple: It's TWOX with a different spelling; from what I remember, they share some of the same MODS.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:32 PM
25

And there are dozens of other words like that, too, like VIOLENCE. I watched a video today from CNN, where the 'expert' explained how the Antifa / BLM riots were not violent because they didn't harm people, only property. When the other person pointed out all the injuries, the person tried to claim that it was the victims' fault for defending their property.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:11 PM
46

Your response sounds like a "YOU" problem.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:05 PM
22

And telling men, "you guys should create your own spaces where you can talk about what is bothering you."
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:04 PM
1

That doesn't shock me at all.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:02 PM
12

I often wonder if there are more teachers fucking/raping students than priests.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 11:45 PM
9

So if I give you a box of smarties and tell you that 3 out of 1000 is poisoned, are you going to eat any???
/r/MensRights21/01/23 10:01 PM
2

How about also acknowledging that men voting was also the exception until universal suffrage as well before that ONLY land owners could vote (in some areas)
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:57 PM
1

NO, some men voted, AND some women voted. Universal Suffrage for women happened only a few short years after men, AND men's universal suffrage came with obligations while womens didn't.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:05 AM
7

SOME MEN had voting right just as some women had voting rights.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 06:13 PM
13

Which shows the people who have REAL power
/r/MensRights19/01/23 12:02 PM
1

DUDE, some editor on Wikipedia made up that definition, it is not the commonly held definition, the sources on Wikipedia itself for that article contradict the very definition you are using.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:59 PM
1

A random editor on Wikipedia made up the definition you posted. It holds how much weight whatsoever.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:57 PM
3

OK, it's NOT patriarchy just because men hold most of the powerful positions.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:56 PM
5

Says the person who used a grossly misquoted/missourced definition from Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:54 PM
3

No, you are right, all you did was put in a quote from Wikipedia that grossly misquotes its sources, but then again, you picked that definition because it suits your agenda.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:53 PM
3

You are using a made-up definition from Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:26 PM
2

Where did you get that definition from? I searched for those words on google, and the ONLY link I got with those exact words was Wikipedia AND then some sources for the definition, WHICH don't match the words, from various dictionaries. What a sneaky little trick you used there; pick a definition that you can defend that some editor (random) on Wikipedia published and that he provides sources for that don't even match the words he used.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:20 PM
10

You want to apply a rule that says, "If you take all the risk, you get to decide what happens," and yet we don't use that anywhere else.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 12:03 AM
17

Could you put that theory in other areas of society and see how it works out? Take a coal miner: (or any dangerous job primarily men do). Do we as a society tell men that since they assume all the risk and suffer all the consequences, they can have all the rights to the money earned? NO, NO, WE DON'T.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:58 PM
1

Correct, on another account. I don't want to OUT it. Going to do it again in a month or so.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:01 PM
3

People don't realize that IMHO, these cases are just a means to an end. Eventually, someone, a politician or a lawyer, will make the case that laws that throw women in jail are not enforceable because courts are unwilling to put women in prison.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:51 PM
31

I will wait a little while and create a different account.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 03:05 PM
407

That is so funny. I did that a few months ago on AITA: I made up a story about how I work from home and do ALL the chores in the house; I mean everything, and my job pays a lot more than my spouse. I said, "Am I the asshole for asking my wife to do more around the house". the responses were fairly typical of what you would expect from AITA. things like "Perhaps her commute is making her tired, perhaps her job is just more demanding," etc; wait a couple of months and post the exact same story but…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 01:25 PM
4

Exactly: Some years ago, I had someone say to me that they would rather be killed than raped. My response (very insensitive, I will admit) was that "Does this mean that if a woman is raped, we should kill her to relieve her pain since you have stated that death is better than being raped".
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:17 AM
8

What is it about sex that drives people off the deep end? Look at GOT, every episode had men being subjected to every manner of death imaginable, including sexual violence, BUT when a woman was subjected to it, the MSM lost their collective minds. This article is the same; this author offers no proof that it's overwhelmingly sexual violence perpetrated against women in movies etc. But let's say it was; why is that worse? He completely skims over the fact that in movies and tv shows, violence aga…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:09 AM
-2

Yes, they DO, BUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT, most women (on average) don't do as many hours as paid work. As the person said above, when all work is considered, men and women work very similar hours, AND a fair amount of the time-use surveys miss the 'housework' that men do because their survey needs to be longer to capture it.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 12:52 PM
2

They say women are underrepresented BUT are they. What percentage of MEN that WORK are on corporate boards, and what percentage of women? From my quick calcs, less than 1000th of 1 percent of men are on corporate boards, and it's the same for women (rounding to the nearest 1000th)
/r/MensRights08/01/23 01:24 PM
5

So let's say her great great grandmother couldn't do something. HOW is giving her a considerable benefit in current society supposed to be fair when she benefits, and someone else doesn't?
/r/MensRights04/01/23 11:07 PM
12

Please get back to me when that starts happening. Again, you are comparing something already happening to something that will never happen.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:12 PM
16

That hasn't been true for at least two generations; there are countless programs throughout the education system to get women/girls into STEM etc.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:10 PM
4

That sure is widening the goal to let teachers off the hook.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 10:56 PM
31

I was thinking of that today. From what I have read, there have been FAR more teachers raping/grooming students (kids) than priests, yet NO ONE is suing the teachers union or schools en masse like they are doing with the churches. Could it be because the vast majority of the teachers are women?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:22 PM
5

The onion didn't go full-on satire with this; if they had, they would have said, "She will be tried as a MALE", as the sentencing gap for race is approx 5 to 1 while the gap for gender is 20 to 1
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:45 AM
1

It is to a certain extent but that also begs the question as to WHY did the CFO have more charges than the CEO and the face of the company.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:41 AM
2

I love to cook fancy meals,
/r/MensRights21/12/22 12:58 PM
14

Ever notice that no matter what the subject, the pay gap is allows brought up.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:31 PM
6

Except, not a real judge if I remember correctly; it's a reality show of sorts.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:28 PM
7

Thanks folks, looks like I have to use the Browser extension for chrome
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:12 PM
6

And it's even worse than that, if a man puts a child into a safe haven, the authorities will thoroughly search for the mother. If a woman does the same, they put an ad in the local newspaper which doesn't even contain any details about the child or the mother.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:19 AM
4

You win the internet, best comment I have seen in a while.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:48 PM
3

I stopped reading as soon as I read "Karma exists" not it doesn't
/r/MensRights11/12/22 12:11 AM
1

AND she was an adult. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:54 PM
5

You are falling into the "Find the nearest man and blame him" for her bad behaviour. I love you you say, "I have no doubt", that just speaks of an opinion without fact.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:04 PM
4

SHE WAS AN ADULT.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:03 PM
3

AND she was an adult.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:03 PM
6

She was an ADULT, he didn't have more charges, and he had more convictions which itself calls into question why??? She was the CEO of a billion-dollar company, but NOPE, she is a woman, so to you, not culpable.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:11 PM
3

She started THERONOS, not him, he invested to be sure. SHE started this. not him
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:10 PM
4

Did you forget a /s
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:05 PM
7

Sarcasm ahead: What about the fact that sometimes a man will explain something to a woman that she already knows or sometimes a man will sit with his legs too far apart on public transit surely those things override everything you wrote above.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 11:34 AM
8

And with all this extra strength, men are still the majority of victims of almost all types of crimes.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:15 PM
4

AND for Homer, the more subtle form of misandry is that while homer is lazy, fat incompetent, he still cruises thru life in easy mode.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:37 PM
76

EXCEPT: Would a man get this The woman was given a six-month suspended sentence
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:15 AM
3

So here is my thought on this. "But there were four different girls who made an accusation; therefore, it MUST be 100% true because there were four of them." Isn't that how society thinks that MORE accusations mean it must 100% be true (looking at you McMartin Daycare)
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:18 PM
14

So from my perspective, here is my TLDR for this article. "Women can choose to do whatever they want, BUT they must choose what I want them to do."
/r/MensRights26/11/22 12:56 PM
23

We shall see when her boyfriend is sentenced. That will be a real example to see if gender made a difference. IMHO it already has because he was convicted of more charges even though SHE was the CEO.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 11:58 AM
6

Another way of saying it is that women are human beings men are human doings
/r/MensRights18/11/22 11:58 AM
1

Let me put this another way. If this was YOUR friend, would you release his information onto Reddit?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:51 PM
1

You want me to release into this environment a man's name and, ultimately, his information so that YOU can verify the story.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:49 PM
0

By PUBLIC, I meant I am not giving out information that would lead to my friend's name being all over the internet. It would be a matter of public record iow if a lawyer were to look up the case.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:05 PM
0

Not going to make this public
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:46 AM
2

I am not going to make this public
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:45 AM
5

Nope this was not a public thing.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:14 PM
16

No Canada
/r/MensRights16/11/22 06:50 PM
5

True, it's that fact that might get her a lengthy jail sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/22 01:24 PM
27

You are going to be able to see exactly what will happen her former boyfriend was also convicted and we will get to see an almost direct comparison of what a man will get and what a woman will get for the same crime at the same time.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/22 12:33 PM
4

They quote 3% as the figure so lets go with that. Let's say that 3% of women who report rape are murdered by the person they reported it would be the exact same number of women as men who are falsely reported BUT would any of these people call it RARE.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:57 AM
11

I think he is saying "Why are the people killed ALL MEN"
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:25 PM
1

What does she mean by "No one ever questioned there being nine men" it has been questioned ALL the time for as long as I have been alive.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:28 PM
1

Not protected and hostile are not the same as not available for example, Not protected could mean there is nothing codified into law that says it's legal, and HOSTILE could (and does) mean that government money can't be used to support abortion.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:57 PM
1

That is a far cry from "Pretty much non-existent"
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:27 PM
1

That info you posted shows that only 12 states have it illegal a far cry from what you said before This is what you said earlier: *and as mentioned abortion acces is pretty much non existence now or heavily restricted * It is neither in the chart you posted it is in 12 out of 50 states that disproves the very thing you said.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:25 PM
1

Where do you live that it is pretty much non-existent NOW? ** ​​The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, meaning states can now ban abortion. Some states have banned abortion or created lots of restrictions. But abortion is still legal in many states, and it's legal to go to a different state to get an abortion. Abortion is NOT banned nationwide.** This is from planned parenthood. Your statement is pure hyperbole.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:21 PM
2

So like, if a man wants kids and a woman doesn't, then if he forces her to carry, he's infringing on her rights AND in the west, that doesn't actually happen. BUT the reverse CAN and DOES happen.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:56 PM
2

Look up withinthis thread, and you will see the definition of Reproductive Rights (UN) that I use. Within that definition, men have NO rights to control their children's timing, spacing and number. If you get raped, you cannot control whether you become a father. As far as a vasectomy goes, it would be best if you did a little research before you make the statement that MEN don't get pushback on getting it done. A lot of doctors won't do them on young men. A right that can be overridden by someo…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:46 PM
26

Not as it relates to reproductive rights, it isn't (which hint nudge nudge it's what we are talking about here) If a woman is raped/sexually assaulted, the law allows her certain reproductive rights to mitigate anything that results from the crime committed against her MEN don't have that right. Here is the definition of reproductive rights that I (and the UN) use. "The right of individuals and couples to decide the number, timing and spacing of their children"
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:04 PM
42

As opposed to WOMEN in the west.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 10:07 PM
85

Sorry but no not even that gives men any rights look up young boys (as young as 12) who have been raped by older girls/women and are still held legally responsible for their child that was conceived.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 10:07 PM
149

I have had that discussion many times with people when they bring up reproductive rights for women and that all women want is equal rights to men. It comes as quite a shock to people when they realize that, in reality, men have zero reproductive rights in the west.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 09:08 PM
1

Imagine the following scenario: "Scientists predict the dangerously low level of population growth in 10 years." So the US and other countries pass a "Birth Draft" all people with uteruses ages 18 - 35 have to register and, if needed, will be impregnated and give birth to a child given to the state. NOW IMAGINE THE OUTCRY over that. As preposterous as that sounds fundamentally there is no difference with the current draft system
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:03 PM
1

That post was a perfect example of a strawman. Well done.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:20 AM
3

It's math. You see all those things you pointed out as true in the West, BUT Men sometimes spread their legs while on public transportation, so that fact negates all the stuff you posted above. /s
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:29 PM
1

There have been a few stories out today that she is NOT richer than him AND his earnings have kept going up while hers have gone down https://people.com/sports/what-would-happen-if-tom-brady-and-gisele-bundchen-divorce-attorneys-weigh-in/
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:06 PM
12

While all that is true, I believe maria Schriever had more money than Arnold when they got divorced OR at least didn't need the money, yet she got alimony from him.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:16 PM
1

Sorry I don't
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:49 PM
6

I participated in a time-use study some time ago. One of the points from the survey team that they came back and asked us about what, "Why, when you do laundry, do you only count 25 mins total per load, but your wife counts 1 hour 10 mins per load," my response. "I don't count the time the laundry is in the machine; she doesn't."
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:35 AM
6

It's not just that, even if you look at Bezos, how many hours does that guy work in a week, probably far north of 80.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:28 AM
1

AND what you failed to do was remove most sexual assaults because most aren't perpetrated by strangers so you would remove most of those.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:21 PM
1

I didn't say call, I said contact. there was a link on my FB to contact them
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:39 PM
5

They even have RULES on HOW you can discuss issues such as MGM/FGM , DV etc
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:07 PM
3

The discussion I am referring to on the FB page was part of a thread about how women are more often victims of violence than men are.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:49 PM
3

what???, you really expect me to dox myself
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:47 PM
7

Sp what - Yes, that piece of information is true but isn't at all relevant to the discussion at hand.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:00 PM
12

AND those men also contain the subset called black men. Is it black men's fault they get shot more per capita because of their willingness to participate in crime
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:16 PM
17

See what you did there, you made an excuse for why black men get shot more per capita, and it's because of racial bias, BUT it probably never crossed your mind that perhaps the reason MEN get shot more is because of gender bias; the gender bias in men vs women is approx 20 to 1 while the racial discrimination in POC vs white is only 4 to 1 If there were racial bias, it would mean black women would get shot/arrested more than white men.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:43 PM
20

I hope you didn't hurt your back performing that much gymnastic to try and turn a fact that men are victims of crime more than women into "WOMEN ARE THE REAL VICTIMS" I wonder, would you post something like this if the topic was "Why do police more often shoot black men in terms of their per capita."
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:01 PM
25

No, that wasn't the conversation being HAD; this was on a post by someone about how women are more often victims of crime than men and that specific laws should be passed etc. My own narrative is that men are more often victims of crime than women; if that is a narrative to you, then so be it.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:12 PM
16

So were A LOT of people, they didn't get billions by divorcing the owner of the company
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:09 PM
4

No, NO NO, she is a billionaire philanthropist. Pretty easy to be one of those when you are giving away someone else's money.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:35 PM
1

I think perhaps someone is sarcasm impaired and I even said it was sarcasm in the title and in the body of the message
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:34 PM
0

From my perspective as a NON-FEMINIST. We would have to determine what day of the week it is, then decide what the definition is depending on the mood and how much we want to shit on men.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:12 PM
6

I am going to throw a little shower thought into this I actually asked this to someone a few years ago. "The scenario" I got a vasectomy a few years ago. I win the lottery, and this woman hooks up with me with the express intent of getting pregnant so she can get a ton of money due to CS. I don't tell her I had a vasectomy. AM I guilty of sexual assault because I withheld information that was crucial to her deciding if she would sleep with me? If feminists have their way, YES, YES, I would be.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:43 PM
34

I have two relatively common and straightforward questions. "What is her name." "Where is her picture." If this were a man, we would know that info.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:01 PM
1

And the political process of deciding on an abortion that is touted as a private decision between a woman and her doctor is paid for, BUT lots of other life-saving procedures are not.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:54 PM
11

Who said I was upset>>> Projection Much
/r/MensRights16/09/22 07:42 PM
77

Yes, I would rather have it say, women. My point was that when men do something wrong, they are called out for it by gender.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:17 PM
11

Increased risk compared to WHOM, certainly not white men, as white men are killed at much higher rates than black women
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:39 AM
87

I could be wrong here, but I seem to remember that WHITE MEN are killed at higher rates than black women. The racial disparity is approx 5 to 1, while the gender disparity is 20 to 1 https://www.statista.com/statistics/585149/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-gender/
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:34 AM
26

I recently discussed with a woman who broke up with her fiance because he asked for a prenup. He is a veterinarian and makes damn good money. He is in his 40s and has worked as a vet for over 20 years, so he has some serious assets to protect. Her theory was that he didn't trust her so that's why he asked. I had a couple of questions for her. 1) Do you plan to get into an accident when you go out today, if not. Why do you have car insurance? 2) Can you say with certainty that if you were to get …
/r/MensRights30/08/22 12:17 PM
2

For sure
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:28 PM
5

So, unless they are gay, these white men are taking viagra to last longer so they can please their partner, OR may I getting this wrong?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:54 PM
45

Yes because if there is one thing these type of bans understand is "NUANCE"
/r/MensRights25/08/22 01:42 PM
15

I remember reading a few years ago a story about the show "The week the women left" they asked the producer why they never did one called "The week the men left," and they said that it was because they could not make it work logistically, all the police, firefighters, sewage works, garbage folks etc. were all men, and the insurance companies would not cover them
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:00 PM
7

So the putative father registry is the worst piece of legislation ever for men's rights. Adoption advocates created it, giving men fewer rights to their children than before. It sets out very short timelines and is not at all well advertised as even existing. No one should have to record every sexual encounter with the government and record their partner's name to have a slim hope of having some rights to their child. This is what this registry requires.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:31 AM
6

What group of men are you talking about? The Supreme Court is NOT a group of men.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:26 AM
28

How about VAWA, a program designed to help women and exclude men? When was the last time a group of men did that???
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:25 AM
8

So then, here is a simple question: What is the solution???? What would be YOUR solution if you had the power to solve this issue?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:16 AM
10

So what???? , she should love her child more, shouldn't she? She made the choice to have a child.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:11 AM
5

And yet you cared enough to make a couple of false posts about it.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:51 AM
10

Because it's not a tough choice for her, she has enough money and resources to live very comfortably for the rest of her life, IT ISN'T A TOUGH CHOICE>
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:43 AM
2

Except that in most cases it is NOT the father who is forcing the woman to carry; it is the government (voted in by women (majority of voters) and men). AND the government forces us to do lots of things with our bodies against our will.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 05:10 PM
10

And no one in this thread is suggesting that. Stop strawmanning the OP.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:57 PM
3

Do you have a reliable source for the assertion that men didn't want to have to deal with birth control?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:56 PM
3

But she isn't forced into that, she chooses that.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:55 PM
2

Sure there is. Give men a matching option, not the same option, not forcing a woman to term or forcing an abortion but an equivalent one. And that is what financial abortion is about.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:54 PM
8

Have you seen the picture of the Huffington post editorial board touting their 'winning' diversity? 100% women, except for 1 Asian woman; all others were white.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:00 AM
1

That was my point, though, prosecutors know that, and they also know women are less likely to be convicted so charging them with lesser crimes might increase the possibility of getting a conviction.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:42 AM
6

I agree
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:15 PM
27

Sometimes, the system will charge a lesser charge to ensure a conviction. You would be appalled at how often juries don't convict on 1st-degree murder due to not understanding the judge's instructions.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:47 AM
16

So then you DO think alimony is body autonomy because you don't have a choice to partake in alimony under threat of jail.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:01 AM
8

Body autonomy is the right for a person to govern what happens to their body without external influence or coercion. So, in the case of alimony, you are being forced under the threat of jail to work and work enough to make a specific amount of money and then give that money to someone else.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 10:59 AM
40

A shower thought. If birthrates are dropping, is there a possibility that we could get to a dangerously low amount of people? IT IS POSSIBLE. So what do we do about it? Simple: A BIRTH DRAFT 18 - 35-year-old females must sign up for a birth draft; in the event we need women to give birth to repopulate, we will have a pool of young women to give birth to society's babies. JUST LIKE THE MILITARY DRAFT. Of course, this is tongue in cheek BUT is it? After all, WE have drafts just in case we need men…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:48 PM
35

For a few years, there was a policy in a fair number of police stations to arrest BOTH and let the courts sort it out, then large groups of feminists got involved with politicians and rescinded that policy.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:45 PM
16

Correct. Another nugget that I find highly annoying. Perhaps, in heterosexual marriages, wives may encourage their husbands to be more socially connected and go to the doctor more, two things that men do at lower rates than women Using words like PERHAPS and MAY in a scientific study shows how unscientific it is. The term I think that applies is "Weasel Words."
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:32 PM
6

I believe the term for this kind of 'study' is Advocacy Research; iow, start with a premise and design a study to prove your premise.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:15 PM
18

Here is my response to this. "Let's say you have a company called Smith and Jones Pottery builders," they are decently successful for many years, and one day Smith decides to leave the company, and after they go, Smith is doing MUCH worse off, and the company (Jones) is doing much better. So what does this mean, it means SMITH wasn't pulling their weight; that's what it means.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:57 PM
3

That has nothing to do with your claim that HC in Canada is free.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:37 PM
3

But this alone makes your statement that healthcare is FREE in Canada incorrect or, at best inaccurate.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:38 AM
3

I live in Canada, and there are procedures that are paid out of pocket, certain meds are paid out of pocket,
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:34 AM
5

Healthcare is not FREE in canada, some procedures are free (although we pay much higher taxes than other countries) and some are not free, medicine (a key component in healthcare) is also not free.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:26 AM
6

This is weird because they don't even think of a woman forcing themselves on a young girl ONLY MEN bad - Women good.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:52 PM
9

The prosecutor also showed texts where she knew what she was doing, was wrong as she was worried about getting caught.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 10:04 AM
1

What if you identify as menstrating??
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:19 PM
9

He had NO INCOME, so 2.5% of 0 is (wait for it) ZER00000000
/r/MensRights23/07/22 10:45 AM
14

Child support is based on income, He had zero income. This was not a payday, it was compensation for the time spent in jail
/r/MensRights23/07/22 10:43 AM
60

!remindme 6 months She gets 5 years, he gets a life sentence???
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:02 PM
33

From reading articles like this over the last several years. The theme is always the same "Men are doing worse in XYZ, but MUH GENDER PAY GAP." And people wonder why the GPG is being pushed so hard because it is used to justify just about everything bad happening to men.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:47 AM
1

The movie is called double jeopardy, but in legal terms, it is complete bullshit; double jeopardy doesn't work that way because if it did, it means if you stole someone's car and were put in jail for it, you could steal it again after you got out.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:53 PM
10

And yet there is rarely video evidence, and yet men still get convicted on testimony alone.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:49 PM
9

The same way you prove they would be telling the truth, evidence.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:32 PM
9

Where do you get the idea that it is nearly impossible to prove? You are putting forth 'facts' that are only opinions.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:33 AM
9

I am genuinely curious about what this has to do with Double Jeopardy. I have seen the movie, and frankly, I don't get the connection.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:17 AM
13

Where did you get the idea that it is very, very rare?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:15 AM
29

Isn't there also the reverse of that? With NO CONSEQUENCES, a large group of women will make a false accusation because they know they will not suffer any consequences; if they COULD suffer them, they would not take the chance. Isn't that the reason we have jail time for breaking the law?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:11 AM
3

I wonder what the ratio is to these teachers to priests molesting kids
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:20 AM
16

I have seen enough videos of the PERP WALK for men, and not once have their face been blurred out.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:57 PM
2

No one doubts that fact, but the way you wrote your OP made it seem as though there was something inherently wrong with it.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:18 PM
1

"People with a uterus," do you mean WOMEN. Why are you trying to erase women?
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:12 PM
5

I am not sure why you posted this. Were you trying to show there is a bias OR is not a bias. Because here is the thing. the difference between men living in poor health and women is only 5% which is about the same amount that men die sooner.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:11 PM
1

Its pleasantness has nothing to do with the power that it gives women.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:53 PM
2

are you serious???
/r/MensRights20/07/22 07:51 PM
2

Because they remove so much power from women.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 06:47 PM
2

We will never have artificial wombs. In some areas, a man can't get a paternity test without the mother's consent; imagine giving men the power to create life without a woman.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:30 PM
3

You seem to be saying there appears to be a conscious effort to hire men instead of women for higher-paying jobs. Look at your phrasing.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 01:48 PM
1

d immediately afterward, and lay claim to the estate on behalf of the child. Is so , Why is there a charge in a lot of areas for 'doing nasty things to a dead body"
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:05 AM
6

It's not for CHILD support per se BUT a portion of his estate.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:01 AM
4

Was that sarcasm.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:48 AM
20

It's because they are using a UN trick. Women live longer, which means that by nature, the last years of their life will be in poorer health than the other years. So if you live longer than me, you will have MORE years in poorer health because being dead is not considered POOR health.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:47 AM
6

Your phrasing seems to infer that this is somehow WRONG that men are disproportionately hired as opposed to MEN doing them.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:36 AM
4

Where do daycare workers get paid MORE than teachers???
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:59 AM
3

No, it isn't the solution UNLESS the problem is the ratio of male homelessness to female homelessness. then it is a solution, not a good one, but it would solve the ratio problem
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:45 PM
1

Here is something I read a few years ago. If the US government forced ALL Fortune 500 companies to have a female CEO, that would mean 500 rich white women would be CEOs , and very few would be poor or WOC.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:57 PM
1

/sarcasm ahead They are right, though; the abortion clinics would be next door to the thousands of testicular cancer centers we have now; next to that are the prostate exam centers, and of course, don't forget the roving busses doing remote rectal exams for men.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:53 PM
1

When trying to solve a problem, absolute numbers are significant. It was explained to me some years ago by a woman with a Ph.D. in Mathematics. When you look at a problem o determine if ratios are essential or are 'raw' numbers, look at the problem you are trying to solve and see if you can solve the problem by making all sides of the equation equal. In this example, if the problem is defined as "too high a ratio between aboriginal women vs non-aboriginal women, you can solve the 'problem' by in…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 09:11 PM
1

Well, since it's real people who go missing and who are murdered and not a numerator or a denominator, the total number of victims, otherwise it's a math problem, not a human problem.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:40 PM
5

Yes, it is. It seems to always come back to 'women have it worse' even when they don't.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:04 PM
40

When we talk about this stuff in the OP. There are four groups of people, Aboriginal Women, Aboriginal Men, Non-Aborigial Women and Non-Aboriginal Men. Of those four groups, Aboriginal Women have the fewest victims, yet there was a national inquiry and calls of GENOCIDE about it. Amazing (but in a bad way)
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:51 PM
6

You are the one who brought this up , not anyone else. BTW, has the US president said anything about this death gap, NO but he sure mentioned the 77c on the dollar pay gap.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:28 AM
1

You think it is better. ASK a young person which is better, the ability for a single-income household to be able to afford a house, car and live a comfortable lifestyle with money in savings OR living paycheque to paycheque. Right now in Canada it is hard for TWO people working full time to be able to afford a house, let alone one person working
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:41 AM
6

AND also work for hours per week, so even if men and women worked the same jobs for the same hourly wage by law. MEN would earn more
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:35 AM
3

So, there were four different charges, three for the killings of 3 children plus one for unlawful disposal of a body.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:53 PM
6

So if we use your 'method' then it means DV is not important because spouses spend much more time with each other than strangers, meaning that stranger violence is much worse because of the 'violence per hour' ratio.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:50 PM
1

It's very similar to other countries too.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:48 PM
1

WAY LESS than a centry. about 10 years in the US
/r/MensRights07/07/22 10:07 AM
39

It's even worse when you consider that male suffrage did not occur too many years away from female sufferage.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 10:06 AM
3

You really have to learn to follow threads.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:12 PM
4

BTW, it should be just about time for you to go to page 2
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:51 PM
11

It sure does; if you are forced to work on behalf of someone else, that sure as hell is body autonomy.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:48 PM
37

You really have to get out more and stay the fuck out of Twox, Do a google search for it. It is the doctors decision for men and for women.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:42 PM
6

You claimed that men have the right to do what they want with their own bodies and they don't.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:22 PM
29

Wrong for several reasons 1) Abortion 2) Baby Moses Laws 3) Adoption without father's consent
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:20 PM
12

Nope, men are just forced under threat of jail to pay someone else money for a child they did not consent to.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:14 PM
3

Really, I have the right to take any drug I want, take any medicine that I want, and not be forced to work (use my body) to support someone who has sexually assaulted me that resulted in a child.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:14 PM
35

Bodily autonomy is the right to governance over one’s own body. This is the definition that I am going to use, if you have a different definition then please post it here. By this definition, men do not have it. If a man is sexually assaulted and a baby comes from that, this man can and will be forced to work on behalf of two other people, his rapist and the child.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:11 PM
19

Is it also possible the victim is female?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 09:47 PM
1

The problem in the USA now is women no longer have the right to choose what happens to their own body which affects everyone trying to live a responsible life both men and women. Because of this statement, now you are just trying to please weasel words with me. You mention it affects everyone, and a state's rights don't affect everyone, only the people in that state. PLUS women just like men have always had restrictions on what they can do with their bodies.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 05:35 PM
1

So then what were you using as the basis to say that women no longer have the right to choose what to do with their own body?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:46 PM
1

WOW, that was an excellent post until this part "in the USA now is women no longer have the right to choose what happens to their own body" that is NOT what the overturning of Roe v Wade does. Education yourself.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:19 PM
2

IMAGINE the national outcry if a father took his child and told the mother the child had died and then gave it up for adoption, and then the court did not rule for the mother.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:17 AM
1

Of course, one is more important than the other; if one causes a 20-fold increase in the likelihood of negative police interaction, that is WAY more important than one that causes a 4-fold reaction.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:12 PM
1

AND you aren't winning anything by ignoring the most predictive of value when it comes to negative police interactions.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:01 PM
7

You are the one who made the assertion that there are millions of examples. It is therefore on you to prove what you said.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:57 PM
1

Let me try an analogy Let's say you are looking to cure a disease, so you look at the people who catch it and you find that all people of colour get the disease at higher rates than white people. So from this, you determine that the leading factor is race/colour of the skin. Off you go to set up a study to determine why people of colour get this disease more than white people. You bring in test subjects only to find that Men of COLOUR get the disease 12 times as often as women of colour and then…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:56 PM
8

I will make it easy for you. Only provide 2000 examples since there are millions of instances; you should have no problem providing only 2000 examples.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:46 PM
4

That sure sounds like a made up statistic. AND the reason this law exists is because of Jian Gimeshi, his accusers conspired with each other online, they wrote him love letters, and sent 'glowing' text messages after the fact and the prosecutor knew about NONE of it. That's why.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:45 PM
7

That isn't what I meant at all. I meant that your example was an outlier and unrealistic about what is brought up in these types of cases, but you knew that.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:34 PM
1

Because it isn't as much of an issue regarding police interaction, if it were, women of colour would have more negative interactions (shooting etc.) than all white people AND THEY DON'T.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:23 PM
12

t isn't. This will just mean more men going to jail because women won't have to have their sexual history put on display in order to prosecute their rapists. It's interesting that you only mentioned MEN going to jail Your misandry is showing.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:30 PM
13

Bad example, that is NOT what is going to be brought up.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:26 PM
15

Wouldn't it be more accurate to remove "THAT NIGHT" from your statement?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:24 PM
1

Was that for the purposes of a tax deduction for a dependant?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:14 PM
1

So you don't have any but personal attacks to come back with.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:06 PM
1

So you are suggesting by saying "no bearing on personhood" that you don't have to be a person to be considered for this tax break. Do you have a link to any government that has allowed a NON PERSON for this?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:03 PM
56

https://www.google.ca/search?q=nichole+ryan+supreme+court&sxsrf=ALiCzsbxyuich93rG9tSiKomFoCM_G6mVw%3A1656580501717&source=hp&ei=lWm9YpuWKemIptQPxM6QqAQ&iflsig=AJiK0e8AAAAAYr13pV8f_ozcWe83BiLJ2xZSsx9UG1l7&ved=0ahUKEwjbtOCi69T4AhVphIkEHUQnBEUQ4dUDCAk&uact=5&oq=nichole+ryan+supreme+court&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBwghEAoQoAEyBwghEAoQoAE6BwgjEOoCECc6EQguEIAEELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoFCAAQgAQ6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOggILhCABBCxAzoLCC4QgAQQsQMQ1AI6CAgAELEDEIMBOgUILhCABDoECCMQJzoOCC4QgAQQsQMQxwE…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:02 PM
1

There was a post on Twox, where the OP said the things after the ** as their argument as to WHY a 'fetus' is not a child because if it was the government would allow it as a tax deduction. My post was simply saying "So if the government allows it as a tax deduction, does that then make it a child and now abortion should not be allowed because you would be killing a child"
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:27 PM
1

I never said they couldn't. Not sure what you read into what I said.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:13 PM
322

You want to see how fucked our Supreme Court is and by fucked up I mean politically correct. Look up the Nicole Ryan case. In short, she hired a hitman to kill her ex-husband (the hitman was undercover RCMP), when it got to the supreme court they said her defence was not valid BUT ordered the crown (prosecutor) not to re-try her. What they completely forgot was that Mr. Ryan would be dead if she had been talking to an actual hitman and not an RCMP officer.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:12 PM
5

I guess if you can't refute what is being said a personal attack will do.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:36 AM
3

It's been done, look up Nora Jones.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:23 PM
1

Not sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:18 PM
4

Except right now MEN have zero reproductive rights in the US, Canada and most of the EU
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:10 PM
11

Not true actually, let me explain If I am sexually assaulted and a child results from that, I have to work or risk going to prison to support that child. HOW in any sensible way is that having body autonomy.,
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:48 PM
1

BUT if you look at the number purely based on race and remove gender there doesn't seem to be that much of a problem, after all very few women of colour are targeted by the police, if race was such a huge factor then black women would be targeted a lot more than white men.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:31 PM
16

She doesn't want to hear men's opinions, only her opinions in a lower register.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:28 PM
2

I don't know, seems Karla Homolka did pretty well in prison.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:19 AM
1

There are A LOT more false accusations of rape in any given year, and feminists like to say those are extremely rare.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:28 AM
1

Well then perhaps you should do some reading before you spout off and come off looking so ignorant
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:31 PM
36

Because she isn't claiming a religious exemption, I may disagree with it, but religious exemptions are a thing. Excluding someone based on their sex isn't Do you believe she should have been able to?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:23 PM
1

Do you have any idea how many things people are NOT ALLOWED to do that would come under 'medical autonomy'
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:05 PM
5

pregnant people As soon as I saw that, I stopped reading. They won't even refer to them as women anymore and then wonder why society doesn't care if a woman's right is diminished.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:09 PM
8

Sorry, but that does not give you the right to control your reproduction. BECAUSE if it did provide you with that right, you could not be held liable if those things were to fail, and you would be off the hook for being a parent.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:36 AM
6

No, it isn't immoral, and if so, please reply to the right person, Mr/MRS Character-Ad-7197 above, who was the person who claimed that there is a high mortality rate when there isn't.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:31 AM
11

In 2020, 861 women were identified as having died of maternal causes in the United States, compared with 754 in 2019 That really isn't very high at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:48 AM
4

Where is this evidence of which you speak?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:39 AM
1

So. I had this conversation with a lesbian couple yesterday and asked them if they would participate in this sex strike; they said, "Why this is supposed to get men to act." "So you think men as a group have any social power to effect change." Where have you been living for the past 100 years?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:15 PM
9

Nope I'm from the UK and secure in my reproductive rights This was YOUR statement that you are secure in your reproductive rights, so I ask you to name your rights.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:14 PM
15

Reproductive rights in WPPA 'All couples and individuals have the basic right to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have the information, education and means to do so; the responsibility of couples and individuals in the exercise of this right takes into account the needs of their living and future children, and their responsibilities toward the community' (para. 14(f) in the Principles and Objectives). That is the definition from the UN convention on h…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:41 PM
1

You need a few more weasel words in that post.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:15 AM
4

manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. Because this is the definition of gaslighting.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:56 PM
10

We don't allow that now, so the point is moot.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:16 PM
18

This post is exactly why I hate feminists. You found a word that has a negative connotation and now use it to describe something negatively that is NOT Gaslighting, feminists do the same with misogony, manspreading, mainsplaining, sexism, pay gap.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:11 PM
1

The vast majority of pregnancies are a choice.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:47 PM
1

Saying sexual assault is very high might be a misnomer depending on how you define very high.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:46 PM
1

You know an aspirin will work as a very effective birth control, right??? Just put it between your knees and keep it there.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:40 PM
1

Unless a rape occurs, it is very much a choice.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 09:00 PM
1

I don't understand your reply at all. Did you mean to reply to someone else? I said that in other areas where someone chooses an action or inaction, they don't get to make unilateral decisions that affect other people, unlike pregnancy, even if those choices carry grave physical danger OR long time danger. You realize that most pregnancies are a choice on the part of the woman, right????
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:59 PM
1

We never apply these conditions to any other area of society, i.e. "Whoever takes the risks gets to make all the decisions unilaterally and the other party gets no say".
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:19 PM
14

In some areas , no, not if he had a belief that her age was older , due to MENS REA https://www.google.com/search?q=mens+rea+meaning&rlz=1C1SQJL_enCA881CA881&oq=mens+rea&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l9.5347j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:35 PM
108

IMHO NO, because of MENS REA. He did not have a 'guilty mind.' BUT you see, all that goes out the window in sexual assault cases. https://www.google.com/search?q=mens+rea+meaning&rlz=1C1SQJL_enCA881CA881&oq=mens+rea&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l9.5347j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:34 PM
1

what movie
/r/MensRights21/06/22 05:19 PM
1

They are NOT entirely separate because they affect MEN and especially black men and in fact, their maleness affects black men MORe than their blackness (when it comes to police interaction)
/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:28 PM
34

In short: An indie dev created what can best be described as an interactive novella, "GAME." She got some good reviews from sites, and it turns out that she may have been having an 'affair' with a journalist. That part is in dispute. What is not in dispute is that gaming journos started a campaign against her boyfriend at the time and collaborated on stories. iow, as one journo would release a story, a bunch of others would release virtually the same story, and it turns out they were part of an …
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:50 AM
47

Here is one I would add unless it is there and I missed it. I need men's rights because even though I am a minority in college, there are almost no scholarships based solely based on my gender
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:36 PM
4

If they are not trying to tip the scales, then why would they need a special court? After all, they are going to need judges etc. for these 'special' trials, iow, they have to get them from somewhere, and they are going to take those people away from other courts to this special court and create a large redundancy
/r/MensRights16/06/22 04:56 PM
12

more rapists will actually get trials to determine innocent or guilt Do you see the irony in that statement and how these special courts are wrong?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:02 AM
6

Mine was many years ago. I had a person working with me who was married to a woman with severe mental health issues. She had attempted suicide several times, one time while her kids were in the car with her, and she tried to drive into a lake but hit a telephone pole which saved their lives. She went to jail for drunk driving and was no longer allowed to be with the kids alone. So for a year or so, this was working, and one morning she got up and told him she was leaving him. She went straight t…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:47 PM
19

The simple and yet complex answer is "NOTHING." You have to look at court cases of not famous men who women have killed, it almost always turns out to be "He abused her first," with no evidence, and some judge will allow her to skate.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:49 AM
1

What is about that name: The authors name is Michael :)
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:39 AM
7

If she were a male professor saying these things about women, would she have a job?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:03 AM
7

Here is another comparison. What if the same number of women who reported rapes (falsely) were murdered by the person they reported? WOULD anyone research to say that it's no big deal?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:08 AM
2

Then I am very glad we don't live in patriarchy in the west.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 06:57 PM
3

The answer to all those questions is easy if you 'understand' the basic premise of feminism "Anything happening to women is the fault of society" "Anything happening to men is their own fault", if you judge everything feminists say thru those two things, it all makes sense. /s
/r/MensRights10/06/22 05:13 PM
1

The very fact that black women are incarcerated twice as much as white women clearly shows this No, it does not, because if it were a RACE issue, Black Women would be incarcerated 2x as often as WHITE MEN, and they are not.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:06 PM
1

Please correct me if I am wrong, but I am getting a menslib vibe from you in that we have to always look at men's issues thru the feminist lens and that lens does not allow for men's issues to be the problem of how society treats our gender, it must be men themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:12 PM
1

If the goal is to help black men (and for this sub it is), then helping them with their maleness problem (as it relates to police and the justice system) will be more effective than helping them with their blackness.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:38 PM
1

Because if you were able to REMOVE the man part of the black man being discriminated against, his chances of being targeted go down much more than if you remove the black part. It goes down by a factor of 5; this means that if we want to help black men (you know this is a men's right group, right), then helping them with discrimination against men (in the justice system) vs against black people their lives to improve much more.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:13 PM
1

It does correlate to gender as police OVER POLICE men vs women, the justice system over sentences men or under sentences women, the same kind of bigotry that causes racism also causes sexism against men <--- Stereotyping
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:09 PM
3

Do you have any examples of this, or more accurately, can you show that this happens ALL the time as you indicate it? Hmm, it Makes bombs and kills many people...HMMMMMM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh Seems he didn't get out of jail for good behaviour or mental illness neither did this guy afaik https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Nichols
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:22 PM
2

Which is 90,000 more people in total.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:21 PM
5

Another one Q: Did you hear they are opening a feminist bookstore down the street Q: What's the difference between a feminist bookstore and a regular bookstore A: The feminist bookstore does not have a humour section.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:21 PM
33

Canadians will get this joke. "Perhaps she just saw it differently than him."
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:02 PM
4

Yes, they can when being MALE is much more of a predictor of being sent to jail AND for longer than race is.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:32 PM
8

It is "MORE OF A MALE ISSUE THAN A RACE ISSUE" if it weren't, black women would be worse off than white men. Think about it this way; Black men are the most incarcerated group among all groups; HOW much of that is because of their race, and how much is because of their gender? Well, if we compare black women to white men, we see which is the more predictive factor; it's their GENDER. I know it's uncomfortable to admit that MEN are discriminated against within the justice system and much higher r…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:31 PM
7

I wasn't talking about medical research but Health care expenditures in the past don't change that fact.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:37 PM
8

So then, what would be enough? FORCING women to choose those fields to achieve perfect parity even if they don't want to. So, it is now time to ask for PROOF of the assertions you are making, please, with examples. Just as a note, I am talking about WOMEN as a group, Not women as individuals. As a follow-up question, do you think there are just as many factors that discourage MEN from applying for specific jobs?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:19 PM
1

So do you realize that in your world view expressed above, this is how it would have to work 1) A student exits high school, and their career is chosen for them based on what is currently needed to fill the gap in some field, i.e. There is almost perfect parity in doctors, but there is one more male doctor than female doctors, so this student has been assigned to be a doctor I know this is a silly example, but it's the only way it would work to get even distribution. I believe it was Jordan Pete…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:33 PM
8

What a great link you posted; of course, it had ZERO to do with what I said; that article talks about medical research in the past, NOT health care expenditures today.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:27 PM
10

A lot of people don't realize that this is a reality in a far number of areas that if the mother names you (to get benefits, for example), you have approx 30 days to contest it, and if you don't, it is a long steep climb to get it reversed (and expensive too)
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:51 AM
27

One of the most significant privileges that women have in the western world is healthcare; WAY more money is spent on women than men, even though women already live longer.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:48 AM
65

So, in summary, when bad things happen to women, it is someone else's fault, and when bad things happen to men, it is their fault. Do you see just how childish that is? Women have not been discouraged from applying for jobs for at least 50 years; most companies have programs specifically designed to get women to apply. Many job ads specifically state they welcome women, and some jobs/companies even have positions ONLY for women. Did you make this post in 1920, and it was delayed in reaching Redd…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:46 AM
4

If you want more of the same go-to MENSLIB here on Reddit, it is very much modelled after the GoodMen Project.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 12:27 AM
10

No, but it is very unfair to people when someone who has not paid off a loan is bailed out by the taxpayers while someone who worked their ass off and paid it off gets nothing.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:30 PM
21

The MAIN problem I have with this is the following. What happens to those people who already worked their asses off , and paid off all their student debt, do they get a refund from the gov.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 08:10 PM
5

Agreed, but they are still the top of the top of the top 1% that never get mentioned as needing to be taken down a peg.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:47 PM
16

You hit on something for me. Oprah, Jeff Bezos' ex-wife, All (or almost all) the Kardashians, and the many other female billionaires and multimillionaire women. These people are NEVER brought up as having too much money and they should pay way more in taxes.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:14 PM
16

AND she countersued him for the same thing, so Once again, hypocrisy as she didn't think he should have freedom of speech
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:15 PM
3

Let's carry that logic a bit further, shall we? If a couple is married and one person is physically stronger on average that means you would expect there to be more violence against the weaker person, it doesn't excuse it but it also isn't odd the numbers would hypothetically be much higher in the group where there's more contact with women. AND yes, that is an excuse, The child doesn't care WHO is abusing them only that they are being abused, and btw, most people don't realize that when it come…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:16 PM
1

It is a simple situation, that situation is that in reality, men have ZERO reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:12 PM
1

Suppose men wielded all this power which you are alluding to. WHY have they not seen fit to give themselves all the benefits, like "total say over it," remember it was all men (on the supreme court) who decided on RvW, or why aren't there tons of male-only hospitals or why aren't the tons of suicide centers (as men are a majority of those committing suicide) etc. etc. The answer is that MEN have no actual power, not as a group, while women do have institutional power. Men have ZERO reproductive …
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:19 PM
1

Not sure what you are trying to say here. Are you 'hinting' at the notion that if men could give birth then abortion / BC etc would be free and available everywhere???
/r/MensRights31/05/22 07:24 PM
1

The same thing happened in the Public Service in Canada and the UK< they removed all reference to gender/sex/race from applications, and the number of women hired went down.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:23 PM
8

Go away, fucking troll. There is nothing to refute because your response was nothing but nonsense designed to troll me. So I won't be responding anymore.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:05 PM
8

So, at first, I admit I thought you were serious, but from this response, I see you are a troll, and I hope that straw isn't expensive where you live.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:02 PM
11

There are three criteria. 1) Recanting the accusation 2) Physical evidence that no rape/sa occurred. 3) Eye witness testimony giving an alibi to the accused. All three criteria must be met to be considered a false accusation, AND still, the number is between 2 - 10% You are also making a very classic mistake; you removed a very important word, "PROVEN" and then assumed that those NOT proven false must be true; they aren't Feminists have made a living saying how little or 'rare' it is for a rapis…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:13 PM
12

"RARE", no, not by an reasonable definition of rare. The most feminist friendly stats say that 2 - 10% of accusations are proven false, and 2 - 10% of something is NOT a rare occurrence.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:08 PM
1

That is NOT correct, she has to be incapacitated for it to be illegal, DRUNK is not enough. Now having said that, the damage will be done to the man just by the accusation.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:05 PM
18

The other question I have is "Why did those laws ONLY effect the women's children / grand children who are also women, wouldn't it also effect their sons/grandsons as well", it seems to always come down to the "sins of the father"
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:35 AM
21

This question never seems to get answered because the people who make the claim are used to being in an echo chamber where these statements are just taken for granted as true.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:46 AM
16

Which societal reprocussions are you talking about? Name them.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:44 AM
3

I got an even better one for you. Let's say that there are no more false rape allegations, ALL allegations are true, BUT 8% of the time that a woman reports a rape, she is subsequently murdered by the person she reported. WOULD anyone call that event "RARE"? No, it would be declared a national emergency.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:22 AM
14

8% of something is NOT rare.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 12:19 AM
1

If we want to get technical, they can still APPLY they just won't' be accepted, so the right is to apply NOT to get accepted.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:42 PM
7

Yes, it is shocking, AND the right I mentioned is not everywhere. But, FOR EXAMPLE, where I live, it is legal for women to go topless, so they aren't missing a single right.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:16 PM
2

TOPLESS is, as far as I Know, the ONLY right that women don't have that men have (although not in all areas)
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:41 PM
4

It's not so much that they don't think women do bad things, it's more than when women do bad it is the fault of society, and when men do bad things, it's their own fault.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:08 PM
1

More yes, perhaps that's logical, BUT men have NONE. I would allow men to abdicate their responsibility as a parent the same as women can by giving up their rights and resonsibilities.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:57 PM
5

You still didn't answer the question that you replied to. BTW, it isn't a parasite.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 01:45 AM
0

I am not saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 01:44 AM
16

Except that isn't a reproductive right, and it has been proven repeatedly that even if the man chooses not to have sex, it doesn't give him the right to control his own reproduction. Try again.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:23 PM
11

So then, NAME ONE. Name a right that men have to control the 'number,' 'timing,' and 'spacing' of their children.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:19 PM
10

YOu are right, "Men don't have no reproductive rights at all" at least you acknowledge that, and that is why their rights are not under threat because you can't threaten what doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:16 PM
18

What rights did my friends have that were taken away.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:19 PM
1

TLDR: Sit down and Shutup
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:41 AM
3

AND it is taking a human problem and turning it into a math problem.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 03:07 PM
1

Why do you have to break it down by the total number of people? If you do that, aren't you just taking a HUMAN problem and turning it into a math problem. After all, if we look at this as a ratio problem, then there are four solutions, 3 of which help no one and 1 of which only helps a small portion of those affected.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 03:06 PM
2

Modern society has decided that your GROUP identity determines everything about you, not your individual identity. Of course, THEY (SJWs) choose on a whim what those group identities give you.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 10:29 AM
3

Was he convicted? What I saw was that they never prosecuted Kevin Spacey, so therefore it was just an accusation.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:01 PM
4

They don't perform better; they are playing against lesser players than the men's team does. I bet the soccer team I played in high school could beat the US women's team, in fact, they play against boys' teams and lose by A LOT.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:26 PM
1

Actually, I was referring to Kevin Spacey.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:00 PM
47

And it has done nothing. ONE person accused a man, and he is dropped from projects.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:48 AM
15

After watching Amber Heard keep repeating, "I pledged the 7 million" when asked if she "GAVE" the 7 million to charity and saying those words are synonymous with each other, I wouldn't believe another word she said. And then claiming she could not afford to give the money because of the lawsuit and then the lawyer pointed out that she had the 7 million approx 13 months before the lawsuit was filed was priceless.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:23 PM
26

IMHO, feminists eventually get get down to "I want my free stuff"
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:47 PM
9

You should investigate N.O.W
/r/MensRights15/05/22 11:44 AM
59

It's not about need; it's about a wealth transfer. There are people here who think that this woman deserves this money, and of course, she is also required to provide financially for her child, except in this case (and many others), she isn't. This money will be used to provide for HER lifestyle.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 11:43 AM
1

We don't apply that logic to any other area of society in that 'she does the labour, so she gets to make all the decisions."
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:18 AM
4

when the women is also forced to to support? Except they are NOT forced to support.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:15 AM
12

So before I look at her pic, let me guess, she is NOT conventionally attractive.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:42 PM
214

So are they charging her with possession of child porn, a very major crime in itself?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:20 PM
20

Rant: This shit triggers me to no end. Disclaimers: This post explicitly discusses sexual violence and may make some readers uncomfortable. This post highlights situations in which men are victims of sexual assault. Addressing this issue does not negate the fact that women are also often the victims of sexual violence. This guy is writing an article about how men are sexually abused and yet felt the need to post that "I didn't forget about women." I doubt he or anyone else would write that (subs…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:02 PM
3

Getting a vasectomy or tubal ligation is NOT a right, and its prevention isn't because of RIGHTS. It's because of liability on the doctor's part; for god's sake, do some reading. Even though men can legally get a vasectomy when they turn 18, many doctors are hesitant to perform such a permanent procedure on someone younger than 30. Some vasectomy specialists will even turn patients down. So you see, it's the same for men as women. Men are also told what they have to do with their bodies when a w…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:59 PM
3

What? What reproductive rights do men have that women don't? I think you have that backwards. Do men have the right to abortion? Nope, they don't. Do men have the right to choose to be a parent without getting someone else's permission? No, they don't. Do men have the right to opt-out of being a parent legally? No, they don't? Can a man adopt his child without the mother's permission? No, he can't
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:38 PM
3

In North America, they do, but I ask you Name a right in North America that men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:39 PM
2

Exactly EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN; it's funny that there are any feminists in North America considering that women have achieved equal rights, in fact, they have MORE rights than men.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:38 PM
2

Then it should be easy to find a case where a custodial parent was sent to jail by the family court for not financially supporting their child.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:34 PM
2

You are wrong, if the custodial parent pays enough in CS to support the child fully, the non-custodial parent is NOT required to supply anything to the child.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:38 PM
2

Child neglect laws are NOT a part of the group of laws known as family law, but child support laws are. And what I said was that a custodial parent is not required by law to support their child financially, whereas the non-custodial is, and we were talking within the family law system. This is how it works in family law. One person is designated as custodial, and one is non-custodial to some degree; child support is assigned to the non-custodial parent, and by law, they must pay that each month …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:29 PM
2

I hope you don't put your back out ducking and weaving like that. Fact: No law requires a custodial parent to provide for their child; however, laws require it of the non-custodial parent. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Common-Sense Some reading for you on your whole argument.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:46 PM
3

Exactly, you can't, can you?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:32 PM
1

My kids are 38 and 35 years old, and I fully supported them throughout their entire lives. So you can try another personal attack to get your point across.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:06 PM
3

Show me then where a custodial parent is forced BY LAW to support their child financially. If a non-custodial parent provides enough money for the child (as they do above a certain wealth level), the custodial parent does not have to provide any of their own money to assist the child.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:57 AM
3

There is no legal obligation for a custodial parent to support their child financially.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:54 AM
1

We do it for inheritance and trust funds for small children.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:52 AM
2

So in your opinion, what is the issue.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:58 AM
8

My answer is this. "A woman in a relationship is actually much stronger than the man because she carries with her the full strength of the government, police and the abuse industry behind her."
/r/MensRights06/05/22 03:31 PM
12

You completely missed the point of the OP. It is her opinion that is being purchased, so there is no way to know if her opinion is a lie or not.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:41 AM
5

I am curious; why are you asking? Do you not believe that NOW opposes Shared Parenting. Is this link good enough. https://recalculatingthegenderwar.tumblr.com/post/142883164331/most-powerful-american-feminist-organization-kills
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:48 PM
8

Oh GOD, not the "True Scotsman Fallacy," the largest feminist org on the planet (AFAIK) opposes equal shared parenting at every turn; HOW is that fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:16 PM
11

It's a silly comparison, if they wanted to make a comparison then it should be comparing tubal ligation to vasectomy.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:35 AM
16

Great, another woman who comes in to tell us how we are supposed to behave.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:02 AM
3

I think they will find for Johnny but then give him very little, which I believe is what he wants anyway.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:28 PM
3

This isn't a criminal trial, and it's a jury trial.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:24 PM
8

One of the main reasons is they redefined STEM as a simple example. NURSING is not considered a STEM field.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:23 PM
6

Another good example. And while not directly related to the question at hand, look at jobs; she got MORE jobs after it came out she was a domestic abuser.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:51 PM
5

Are you sub filtering by gender as well since Black women get sentences almost on par with white women but FAR FAR FAR less than black men, which 'proves' that it isn't race that is getting black men longer sentences but their maleness.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:49 PM
7

I believe Elizabeth Holmes will prove this to be true; She was the CEO, was only convicted on 3 of 12 charges and will probably get very little jail time; meanwhile, her lover will probably get a lot longer.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:47 PM
6

There was a tv show on YT like that; she 'cried' the whole time about how she was strong and independent and would never teach her daughter to take money from a man until the guy on the show pointed out she was getting 1000s a month in alimony.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:53 PM
2

So by that logic Employment (where you are paid) is slavery
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:02 PM
1

IMHO: If we want to live in a free society we (men and women) will never be equal, but if we want to live in an equal society, we can't be free. (Equal in this context, is equal outcomes)
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:45 AM
1

Right, men never drop off babies are these places, what a load of bs
/r/MensRights21/04/22 06:31 PM
1

So what was the process for a woman vs a man, OR was it the same.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:33 PM
1

You really should read up on what happens when a mother drops off a child .
/r/MensRights20/04/22 06:10 PM
1

But when a woman drops off a child they don't assume it was kidnapped. Do you see you are making my point for me? Thanks, appreciate the post.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:22 PM
1

Both sexes are required to pay to support children that they abandon No, they are not, actually. A woman can drop off a child and not have to pay a cent, the centers will do a very minimal search for the father and I mean very minimal BUT if a man drops off a child they will do an extensive. search and he will be forced to pay for it.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:32 AM
10

That is a point that people don't understand; sure, people will say that "Keep it in your pants," but even if you do that, it doesn't afford you any choices if a woman decides not to adhere to your preference.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:54 PM
2

And how confident that she won't lose her job
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:06 PM
4

Not sure what you mean, but the concept is that right now, Fathers have no rights at all in regard to their children or their own reproduction. FTFY
/r/MensRights17/04/22 01:05 PM
2

It's pretty mainstream right now.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 01:03 PM
3

Then shouldn't she and she alone be responsible for the resulting child?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 09:10 AM
5

No, but we do force men to work (under threat of jail) to support the decision made by the mother of the child.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:37 PM
6

That's the difference between equity and equality , there are many other factors with being a parent OTHER than the physical and since we shouldn't force women to have a child or abort a child the only way we can give equity to men is give them the same rights as women in the other areas.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:33 PM
7

It is why I truly believe that men have NO reproductive rights. This is the UN definition of Reproductive rights. Reproductive rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free …
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:11 PM
7

I read an article the other day about famous sports stars, movie stars etc., who are broke despite making millions, and almost all of them lost a large portion of their money after a divorce.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:45 PM
3

I never said that, What I was referring to is how society treats the priests as a systemic problem but teachers as an individual problem.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:36 AM
4

Have you ever wondered how many teachers are raping their students vs how many priests did?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:06 AM
4

Who are the real victims?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 10:43 AM
2

But false accusations are very rare, I read it on the internet so it much be true /s
/r/MensRights21/03/22 10:42 AM
97

Don't forget that feminists have been saying for years that they are not out to take the stuff away from men; NOPE, it's just about equality.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:03 AM
3

Here is my take: There is a growing movement in the world that we are headed for a population crisis, I wonder how feminists would feel if government instituted a selective service for having babies, where when the time comes women would be forced to be impregnated by IVF and forced to have a child, NOW this is all just theoretical of course
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:49 AM
11

It's almost like you are talking about "Hugo Schwyzer" If you don't know who that is, google that name, be warned "Super Feminist male ahead".
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:38 AM
23

I have seen this tactic used against me "If you don't have a uterus, you don't get a say" I have a couple of responses. 1) What about women who have had a hysterectomy? Do they lose their voice when that happens? 2) I ask, are you a homeless person, if "NO," "Have you ever killed a homeless person," again "NO," "Would you ever kill a homeless person, again "NO," then if the government were to want to come out with a law that made killing homeless people legal, you should not get a say at all.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:35 AM
1

Why are you arguing against a point that I didn't make?
/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:23 PM
9

NATO has nothing to do with it, if Ukraine did what I said above, the UN would get involved.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:13 PM
12

As a matter of fact, I do.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 08:17 PM
48

TIFU: I responded to this on my Facebook page with "If Ukraine really wanted to get international help, they should be preventing 19 - 60-year-old women from leaving and forcing them to fight" The whole world would show up in Ukraine tomorrow to stop Russia.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 07:04 PM
9

IMHO, feminism has 2 underlying principles that define it. 1) Women have it worse, no matter what 2) MA FREE STUFF, iow, I want my rights and I want someone else to pay for it.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:58 AM
20

I wonder how many women have never asked the guy if he wants sex; they just assumed that he did.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 12:21 AM
4

I know exactly what it is, and you made one, which means your point is so wrong that you had to make an EC to make your point.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:22 PM
9

You think the difference between MGM and FGM is the same as between Shootings and a slap on the back. A slap on the back doesn't kill dozens of children a year. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240804903_Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_US_Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:05 AM
14

So by your logic, we should never get upset or do any advocacy for RAPE because murder is much worse.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 08:56 PM
11

Few suicides. Longer Life More educational opportunities, more scholarships More healthcare spending WAY more access to their children upon divorce Less crime is committed against them. Longer sentences against the perps if they are a victim of a crime Shorter sentences if they are the perp of a crime DO you need something else? Of course, they have to put up with people taking up too much room on the bus, so I guess that does cancel everything else out.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 05:58 PM
12

I take it you don't know what happened. They took the SAME resumes and assigned male names to some and female names to some, and men got fewer job offers.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 03:15 PM
12

She is not DOING 41 years in jail, she will do less than 15.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:32 AM
2

So do you use the same argument about the gender pay gap? If so, Post a link to where you use that argument.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:56 PM
17

Is your back OK, that took a lot of twisting to arrive at the conclusion that this isn't a "REAL" problem? Here is why it's a problem "Men pay in MORE and GET LESS OUT" <------- Look over there, right there is the problem just in case you can't see it since you are so bent over backwards to try and NOT see it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:06 PM
5

You are technically correct because in a lot of areas, legally women can't RAPE men because of how the law is written, so then, let's change it to sexual assault. I don't usually look up peoples posts but yours I found interesting. On one post you said "I feel the same. I've had 100+ partners" and then another "Same. I'm 39 and I've never been on a date." You have had more than 100 partners and have never been on a data with any of them. WOW
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:24 AM
18

Feminism sure has taken credit for it BUT technology has also had A LOT to do with it, it freed women from a lot of the burdens that they once had BUT that same tech has IMHO enslaved men more and more. People seem to think that the average man had it SO MUCH BETTER than the average woman, they didn't.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:41 AM
2

Except people aren't defending men who murder women, they are defending the principle of equal treatment under the law, liberals used to understand that but for some reason (identity politics) gave up on that.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 12:15 PM
1

When I saw this my first thought was "What Angelina Jolie, wasn't Amber Heard available"
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:52 PM
6

That's correct; it's everywhere and almost all the time.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 11:44 PM
16

"Silence" OMFG that is crazy, you can't turn on the tv, read a newspaper, go to most news websites in the last 20 years without seeing someone talking about victims (women) of abuse
/r/MensRights10/02/22 11:08 PM
0

So, in short, If someone says "right away" they were raped, that is definite proof they were raped if someone says "later," that is also concrete proof they were raped; if they give exact details, that is also definite proof they were raped if their details are 'fuzzy' that is also concrete proof they were raped. See where I am going with this.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:10 AM
34

That's because all single fathers and ALL Fathers get their Patriarchy cheque each month, so this is just an offset. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:41 PM
12

So whenever someone says to me or writes in a sub that "False accusations are rare," I always come back with this. "Let's say that instead of a false accusation, women who report rape are murdered at the same rate as false accusations (whatever that rate is). If this were true, would ANYONE ever bring up that 'women getting murdered for making an accusation is rare'? No, no, they wouldn't, in fact, people would say, "One is too many."
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:27 PM
10

No, my question is How did they know that women who applied ONLY applied to targeted job ads.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 01:32 PM
15

The question is "How do they know that"
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:34 PM
20

I think they are a part of a group of trolls here; you see specific usernames come and go and then come back.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:34 PM
8

Please define under-represented. Your statement makes me think you believe that women SHOULD be exactly 51% of all employees at a company, talk about entitlement.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:32 PM
2

I disagree with this, I love getting power tools for my birthday.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:03 PM
5

So an accusation is as good as a conviction and that is exactly WHY she did what she did.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:35 AM
3

We really do live in a society where everything is "Find the nearest MALE and blame him"
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:33 PM
1

OK, you are just not getting what I am saying and now I think you are being willfully ignorant, so here goes "What I am talking about is that the non-custodial parent MUST, IS REQUIRED BY LAW under Threat of JAIL, losing license etc to provide money to their child, actually to the parent of their child" the custodial parent has not such LEGAL <--NOTE I SAID LEGAL obligation to do so. They can go on welfare, they can marry someone else who provides the money etc etc etc.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:35 PM
1

You are entirely missing the point. During a divorce, the non-custodial parent is FORCED by law under threat of jail and other sanctions to pay money to the custodial parent "FOR THE CHILD." There is no such decree that requires the custodial parent to provide for their child, e.g., they could go on welfare, marry, or live with someone else (who pays for the child by working). I put "FOR THE CHILD" in uppercase and quotes because while that is what the law says, it isn't what the law does, iow, …
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:33 PM
3

Here is a thought experiment, "Imagine for ONE SECOND, if a man was able to name ANY woman as the mother of his child and be able to get CS from her if she didn't respond in 30 days" Can you say "UN announces HUMAN RIGHTS Violation inquiry"
/r/MensRights23/01/22 02:47 PM
1

I am talking legally. You don't. No divorce or child custody law requires that you pay for anything.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:17 AM
2

But custodial parents are not legally obligated to support their children (post-divorce) only non-custodial parents are.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 02:39 AM
2

Actually legally No they are not.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 12:48 AM
17

When I read that all I could think of was a saying I heard years ago "Every woman is a feminist until they start deciding who is allowed in the lifeboats"
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:55 PM
9

I can give you a straightforward example of this. A few years ago, in London, Ontario, a female cop killed her male lover. It was not classified as a DV murder, no idea why, AND the Chief of police went to the funeral of the murderer but not the victim, both of whom were cops.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 02:10 PM
5

Not sure if you understood but I was saying "YOU WERE ERASING VICTIMS"
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:52 AM
23

So, in short. "Victims are erased because of who killed them"
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:23 PM
5

So you want to take away the ONE THING that allows people to make MORE money, by negotiating their own salary.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:01 AM
39

And there are still people who think men have ANY reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:34 PM
7

Yesterday during the football game, there were advertisements for something in Canada that Bell called "Let's Talk," it is supposed to be about getting help with mental health. Approximately ten people talked to a friend, and the friend said, "I AM HERE" iow, the friend let that person know that someone is listening. So what's so wrong about that. SIMPLE. ALL the people who were being listened to were WOMEN; that's right, not a single man. What message does that send?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:02 PM
5

This really stuck out to me. Almost triggered me Feminism has done a great job at getting us to think past these notions No, No it hasn't it's only tried to do that IF and ONLY IF doing so will advantage women. Paying on dates, men give up their seats on busses etc. Men getting MORE custody all those things.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:43 PM
2

Why is rate important, rate just obfuscates victims and just turns them into numbers. Do we go to the funerals of numbers, do numbers just not come home and more. Do loved ones miss the numbers.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:08 PM
3

So what you are doing is trying to take a human problem and turn it into a math problem
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:20 PM
1

That's the patriarchy making them do that, or it's internal misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:04 PM
8

But, BUT, BUT some guys sit with their legs too wide on public transit so it all evens out.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:02 PM
4

So the amount of abuse isn't important ONLY the amount of abuse per hour. GOT IT.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:38 PM
6

So what is important isn't the AMOUNT of abuse, but rather the amount of abuse per hour. Should be doing this with DV vs Stranger Violence as well.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:36 PM
4

For sure.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:16 PM
29

She should get that, yes, but she won't; she is conventionally attractive, speaks in a pleasantly soft voice (now) and is a woman and a new mother; she will get probation and a fine.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:11 PM
63

Never happen, she recently gave birth, she will pay a small fine and get probation, her ex-boyfriend will be convicted on all charges and get 20 years +
/r/MensRights05/01/22 11:16 AM
2

When someone says domestic violence against men is disgusting So can you show me a popular figure that has actually stated that though?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:37 PM
18

This statement got to me more than it should "Prevention programs can be designed to specifically address women as potential perpetrators to prevent abuses, such as those alleged in the Maxwell case." ALLEGED, even after she was convicted on 5 out of 6 charges, they still state it is only ALLEGED.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:10 PM
4

There is a saying I heard many years ago and I wish I could remember who said it "If women had run the world, we would still be living in huts, oh, beautifully decorated huts but huts non the less" Risk-taking is what has led us to the advanced world we live in.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:37 PM
23

The only one that I can think of and this doesn't apply to all areas is the right to go topless. Pretty minor when you think of the ones if you reverse the genders.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:36 PM
3

?sarcasm ahead But you don't understand 1 in 4 people who are homeless are women.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:05 AM
11

We had a national inquiry about missing and murdered indigenous people, OOPS, I mean women. Men (who are 75% of those murdered or missing in that community) were not even a part of the conversation at all.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 12:28 PM
2

How about a crime that results almost all the time in a lengthy prison sentence and that sure doesn't describe perjury.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 04:32 AM
1

Yes, it is true, a woman can drop off a child at a haven, and she won't have to pay a cent for the rest of her life for the child if she doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:30 PM
2

What you said doesn't change the fact that both parents don't need to consent. I am not sure where you get the idea that perjury is "A SERIOUS CRIME", not even close to a serious crime.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:29 PM
1

Have you done any research on what happens when a MAN vs a Woman drops off a child at a safe haven? Also, you asked for ONE here are 4 (5) Who May Leave a Baby at a Safe Haven In most States with safe haven laws, either parent may surrender his or her baby to a safe haven. In four States and Puerto Rico, only the mother may relinquish her infant
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:28 PM
1

My god, please do some research today I implore you, Today in 2021 and for a long time women CAN do exactly what you claim they can't do. There are a number of options 1) Safe haven laws 2) Adoption , and yes she can do it without the fathers consent
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:13 PM
4

No, actually it doesn't require both parents to consent, In most countries, all the woman has to do is tell the adoption agency she doesn't know WHO the father is (one night stand) or even where he is.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:11 PM
1

Aren't you aware that right now in a lot of countries, the US/Canada/UK included a woman can currently do a financial abortion?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:09 PM
14

Why can't the woman pay for it? Have we gone so far down the rabbit hole of rights vs responsibilities that we forget that if a woman decides to have a child then she can damn well pay for it herself, "Her body, her choice, HER RESPONSIBILITY"
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:08 PM
1

I agree with you completely BUT there are a lot of people (feminists) who don't.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 11:52 AM
1

No, you misunderstand, HOW did they know they were women, they did not know how these people identified themselves, they could have identified as men for all we know.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 09:07 PM
2

Did they explain in the study HOW they determined that these people were WOMEN?
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:16 PM
5

One was a legal starting point (which is what 50/50 would be) and the other is a de facto starting point. Your ignorance on this issue is rather depressing.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:23 PM
5

Except there is a default, MOM gets custody, that's the defacto default right now. It might not be that way in theory but it is that way in practice. You need to educate yourself on 50/50 custody your description of it on these posts is NOT how 50/50 would work. How do you know that children will end up with more violent parents if 50/50 is enshrined in the law, you don't. you are assuming that because of the propaganda.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:05 PM
3

So, the current system prevents a child from ending up with a violent parent. I did not know that. That is good to know. Why do people like you think that 50/50 will lead to more children ending up with a violent parent than they already do? You really are ignorant to how 50/50 shared parenting works aren't you. It might be time to start reading about it on sites other than dastradlydads.com
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:53 PM
14

Because the family court system should not be a winner take all.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:44 PM
20

WOW, you are so wrong, there is NO default for equal custody in divorce, there is no starting point. No one is talking about judges just giving 50/50 without analyzing. 50/50 should be the default position unless otherwise needed. It's interesting that you claim to not know much about N.O.W and yet you seem to know there position on this.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:40 PM
23

How about the national org of women in the US, they fight every single bill designed to have Equal Custody as the starting point in a divorce. That is actively trying to hurt men (fathers)
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:42 PM
1

Hold on a second, they should define "SHARED CUSTODY", I have seen things like he gets 2 days every other week as SHARED CUSTODY because the kids are at his place for those 2 days.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:24 PM
2

But the lion's share of work (total work) does not fall on women. Not when you look at TOTAL work.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:23 PM
22

I haven't seen a single show in years that doesn't show men in a bad light and women as victims, even when the killer is a woman (on a cop/detective show) she is shown as a victim and the killing is somehow justified.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:20 PM
8

Then you better start doing some research into how judges are trained in things like DV and murder.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 09:34 PM
6

Some men are though in every sense of the word. Take a man who has sex that results in pregnancy; he is forced under threat of JAIL to support a child he didn't want, that my friend is slavery.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:04 AM
8

And this one is what I called the Hillary Clinton of Stats on the missing. **Women suffer serious, lasting harm after the disappearance of a male relative, who is often the family breadwinner; Women are generally at the forefront of the search for truth about the disappeared, which puts them at greater risk of abuse, extortion and manipulation; In some countries, the only way a woman can access bank accounts and property that are held in the name of the disappeared is to declare their loved one …
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:57 PM
24

No, they actually get more money as well. ** few claims remain alive such as the allegation that male players get better travel accommodations. But on the key claim that the women are getting paid less than the men, the judge found the opposite: the women are getting higher compensation than the men.**
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:32 AM
146

Just another example of the Apex Fallacy
/r/MensRights13/09/21 09:48 AM
5

IMHO, it also indicates that MEN are broken women who would be fixed if they would be just like women.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:50 AM
9

Would you mind showing me an example of a man who claimed he was sexually assaulted by their business partner that tries to use that to justify what they did?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:23 PM
1

What they meant was "If they want to be treated like full human beings"
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:21 PM
5

You didn't provide evidence at all, your 'evidence' says the factors are difficult to measure and that they MAY (very important word) contribute.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:49 AM
6

Come on, you just posted this Other factors that are difficult to measure <-- if they are difficult to measure then they probably aren't accurate. And add in this *may also contribute * <-- Notice it doesn't say it DOES contribute but MAY iow, it might OR it might not.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:47 AM
1

Why would you go to a hairdresser then, that's your choice to pay more.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:45 AM
12

I read a few years ago that the UK was considering having a specific number of seats in medical schools designated for men because they know each seat will produce fewer billable hours if a woman occupies them.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:42 AM
1

Remember she was in the bank with him when he did it, just like she was at the restaurant.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 05:10 PM
1

So let me ask you this, They go to a bank, he pulls out a gun, robs the bank, they take the money and go on a shopping spree, and she spends half the money. OK, once maybe I would agree with you but 18 times????
/r/MensRights28/08/21 01:18 PM
4

This is not her being a hypocrite if you understand that she doesn't consider men to be "PEOPLE."
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:10 AM
4

Sarcasm Ahead: Warning You forget though all the stuff women go thru 1) Being told to smile more often 2) Having to watch a man spread his legs too wide on the bus 3) Being too cold at the office because A/C is sexist 4) Having a man explain stuff to you. 5) Getting more scholarships for your gender despite being the majority of college students
/r/MensRights18/08/21 10:09 PM
25

It's that kind of thinking that allows the UN (and other orgs) to consider being DEAD as better than living while unhealthy.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:37 PM
5

Cause those are some of the only female-dominated fields could you please make that more obtuse, come on you can do it.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:21 PM
9

Jesus, not one single of those is a RIGHT, the closest thing you said was the 1974 thing and even that, owning a credit card has never been a right. As this post explains, banks were able to discriminate against women applying for credit cards until the passage of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in October 1974. Women could get credit cards prior to this legislation,
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:20 PM
65

No, they won't. Instead, they will be re-written to make them gender-neutral in language but not so in execution.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:03 PM
3

The problem is that this whole thing is a red herring to try and salvage the PR of women.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:40 PM
5

AND guess what the majority of the female victims of DV live with their abusers for long periods of time yet no one says "But the victim spends lots of time with the abuser" as a way to reduce the impact on the PR of the abusers.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:01 PM
3

The amount of time you spend with children is not a cause of child abuse.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:00 PM
1

Seen this argument time and time again but here is the issue for rich people. How much of that 20k a month (just picked a number for rich people) is actually spent on the child.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:31 AM
12

AND neither do you, YET, you gave us her intentions just above where you posted that.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:38 PM
21

Except there is a huge difference between A FEW MEN holding primary power and MEN holding primary power.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:46 AM
10

If you really want to convince people that patriarchy exists, you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source for a definition. Let's pick apart the "women get custody," let's look at history, shall we? For most of history, men got the lion's share of custody after a breakup, and it was FEMINISTS who changed that by lobbying for and receiving from the courts the concept of the tender year's doctrine.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:43 AM
3

The most dangerous words ever uttered that destroy our system are "I am not willing to take a risk, there are children involved"
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:50 AM
15

So there are a few terrifying scenarios where an assault would occur. Take this one, for example. Jane is at a nightclub because she has decided that she wants a child and will find a father for her child. She gets Dave to come home with her and have sex. They have sex, and for the next several days, they continue to have sex. Dave had a vasectomy several years ago and did not tell her such. Did Dave commit a sexual assault because SHE assumed he was fertile? By the definition of 'mistaken about…
/r/MensRights20/07/21 09:54 AM
25

The only thing I hate about this is that he had to end it with "It hurts real victims"
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:22 PM
26

It's possible YES, social media will facilitate that quite easily.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 11:44 AM
1

How do you know this, you are combatting facts with 'feelings'
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:33 PM
4

What am I missing here, is my math that bad. 1/3 more women.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:43 AM
19

Except there are MORE women in Canada, and they have fewer strokes; therefore, they are less likely to get strokes.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:41 AM
6

So please describe What a right is. Because there have been a few court cases that disagree with you, for example recently a woman won the right to embryos post divorce
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:33 PM
34

In almost all measures in society like Education Life expectancy Health Care dollars spent on them Incarceration Drug Use Alcoholism Family Court In all those men are behind, I mean sure women have to put up with being told to smile too often or perhaps sit next to a guy with his legs spread and I know that is close to evening things out but still.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 08:49 PM
3

You do realize that it could also be because men drive MORE highway miles per year and in fact also get in fewer accidents per mile driven.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:28 PM
2

And that stuff doesn't show what the OP was saying at all that men cause the vast majority, by your numbers , it's 60 / 40
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:18 PM
2

You were responding to a specific question with a specific answer that was providing stats that didn't answer the question at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:22 PM
2

I did, came up with that same result and nowhere does it say like the person did in the OP that men cause the vast majority of accidents.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:21 PM
4

Holy FUCK, you are dense. Read the question/statement that was posed, NOT something you made up in your own head. I said I wanted to see the statistics on men causing the vast majority of accidents. Now you have veered off into talking about fatalities and insurance companies; the only stats you provided did not talk about WHO caused the accidents, only who died. I showed some stats that showed women cause more accidents, but you won't accept that, SO tell me, what source would you accept some s…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:15 PM
3

Ok you have moved the goal posts, I said I would like to see the stats that show that men cause the vast majority of accidents. NOT who had died, who costs insurance companies more.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:11 PM
5

You are making a lot of assumptions trying to get from fatalities to who caused the accident.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:01 PM
2

You mean like this one. https://www.syracuse.com/news/2011/07/women_worse_drivers_more_crashes_than_men_less_driving.html
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:58 PM
6

Something "WELL KNOWN" is not proof, that's just the fallacy of "Appeal to Common Sense"
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:48 PM
0

Do you have stats to show that.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:47 PM
10

But that doesn't address that the vast majority of those causing accidents are men; that study, as far as I could tell, were fatalities, not who caused the accident. And remember, men, drive more highway miles, i.e. truck drivers, delivery drivers etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:47 PM
12

i would love to see the stats that show that men cause the vast majority of accidents.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:27 PM
7

That's a whole lot of weasel words for one post.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:05 PM
0

There is a ton of science going into the profession though.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:15 AM
15

The simple answer to this would be "If this was your daughter doing the same thing, would you treat her the same way, if not, YOU ARE A FUCKING ASSHOLE, and should not have children"
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:33 PM
14

I am not sure what you mean. Do you think that Joe Biden (US) and Justin Trudeau (Canada) are using their power for the benefit of men OR for the benefit of women? In the US and Canada, women have much more political power than men do, not because the people who are in power (government) "LOOK LIKE THEM" but because the people who are in power (government) "LOOK AFTER THEM".
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:23 PM
23

The STEM definition has a tendency to leave out areas where women are doing fine (in terms of students enrolling) like Nursing.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:21 PM
12

Don't forget as well that equality and equity are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:20 PM
33

And the unsuccessful men outnumbered the successful men by a HUGE margin and there is already a term for this, it's called "The Apex Fallacy".
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:18 PM
2

But is the risk that much higher and what if he doesn't have an STD.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 01:39 PM
1

But is the transmission rate really that significant of a difference. AND what if he doesn't have an STD.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 01:39 PM
173

Actually, IMHO an all-female jury is probably better than an all-male jury especially if she is conventionally attractive.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 11:43 PM
6

Look at the controversy right now in Australia about the milkshake consent video, I have seen dozens of people say on FB and other places that that video was wrong because it showed a female perp and male victim.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 12:57 PM
86

Predation, Sexual Abuse, Sexual assault. She sexually preyed upon. Am I the only one that thinks if this was a male student the words would be 'relationship' , 'triste', or 'Romp'
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 08:53 PM
7

I have been saying the same thing for years, well done. People just don't realize this
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:12 PM
4

OR. Worst Patriarchy Ever.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:14 PM
4

Here is the other problem, "Suicide Attempt is also overstated because they view 'self-harm' ie cutting as a suicide attempt or more accurately Suicide Ideation.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:14 PM
4

It all makes sense if you view feminism as I do, a religion. Maleness is Original Sin, Patriarchy is the devil, Books like "The Feminine Mystique" are their bible. People like Andrea Dworkin are their saints.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:13 PM
5

There is actually a term for that it's called "Native Advertising".
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:45 AM
4

Can you point me to a subreddit that contains REAL feminists?
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:44 AM
3

He is going to lose this case, WHY??? Because they passed this law for just such a case, this is Canada and we pass laws here to protect women who offer accusations of rape, doesn't matter if they are lying or telling the truth, it just doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:01 AM
8

What did Bernie Madoff get for the same crime?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 06:15 PM
7

And if too many of these cases happen, the law will be changed, no doubt about it, it will be changed to make it illegal to tape someone to prove yourself innocent. If you think I am full of shit, look at what Canada did after a famous celebrity was acquitted because text messages were put forth by the defence to show that the women got together online and that they had sent him text etc proclaiming their love for him AFTER he supposedly raped them. The defence now has to turn over all evidence …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/21 07:46 PM
13

AND that's also a part of the woman/man thing the Plea Deals.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 11:18 AM
1

If one parent is the only parent to gets to decide anything and everything about this child then that parent pays.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 10:42 PM
1

That makes absolutely zero sense, WHY does a child need two sources of income, do you think that single people should not be able to adopt OR what if a married couple adopts a child but only one parent is working. Your entire argument seems to boil down to "Man must pay for woman choice not matter the age of the 'man'"
/r/MensRights27/03/21 05:38 PM
1

I wonder how you would feel about this situation. "A 12-year-old girl has sex with a grown man, a baby is a result, the girls family is horrible so the baby ends up in the custody of the man's mom and dad and when the girl turns 16, they sue her for CS, would you say "She has to pay".
/r/MensRights27/03/21 10:59 AM
1

The mother decided to have the child, the mother alone gets to decide if the clump of cells becomes a child, the mother should then be responsible.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 10:10 PM
1

That's a terrible answer because if you are a man you are willing to throw other men under the bus but not willing to step up and pay for someone else's kid yourself and at least too you are finally admitting that this is about single MOTHERS, not children.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:07 AM
2

I remember it differently, I just got out earlier this year, and I never heard anyone talking about male victims and all the people on the various 'committees' were female. Here is a quick cutout of the executive summary from the report that started OP Honour. One of the key findings of the External Review Authority (the ERA) is that there is an underlying sexualized culture in the CAF that is hostile to women and LGTBQ members
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:39 PM
1

But why should a man pay for a child that isn't his, that seriously fucked up, If you are a man would you be willing to support a child that isn't yours and remember in some jurisdictions (California) you don't even have to have slept with the mother.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:45 PM
1

Source???? Seriously. What kinda source do you need, the only reason I am asking now is so that I don't waste my time giving you a source that you are just going to reject anyway. Here's one. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-child-support Here's another one. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ And another https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?a…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:42 PM
1

**unless it was rape, and that case is different" , except for a MAN it is NOT different, a man being raped, his sperm being stolen (via other methods) doesn't change a single thing for a man, hell even a male child who is forced to have sex is still held legally responsible. ** Sorry you can't force people to do stuff with their body that they don't want to **, I am sorry but what do you think forcing a person to work (under threat of jail) is doing, it's forcing a man to work to pay for a chil…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 09:18 AM
6

So, you acknowledge it's a baby and not just some clump of unfeeling cells. "He helped create" never seems to come up when talking about anything else except "where's my money", during custody, it's "I ruined my body", or abortion "It's my body", adoption "It's my body" and so on and so on.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:10 AM
10

Funny how it went from an unfeeling nonthinking clump of cells and two sentences later it's a baby.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 10:09 PM
2

Except she is JEALOUS of it, not pissed off by it. He's getting more time off is a net positive for her, not a net negative and yet she is on Reddit ranting about it. AND they don't work for the same company that also makes a difference.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:21 AM
3

She isn't annoyed she didn't get maternity leave, she is jealous that her husband DID, there is a huge difference.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 11:19 PM
1

It's wrong because she is RANTING about it.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:29 PM
6

Canada.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:27 PM
2

I have a prediction: This whole violence gap thing will be gone in approx 10 years because by then there will be no gender, no male, no female, no women, no men. So no more gaps.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 06:30 PM
18

And while she says she has a full-time job, we really don't know what they mean, technically you can have a full-time job and work 20 hours a week, full-time (in my country) means you have a regular shift NOT how many hours you work.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 04:54 PM
12

This case is a perfect example of 'women are wonderful effect', there are a lot of cases where a woman doesn't want to testify yet they proceed.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 04:51 PM
12

WOMEN didn't start setting them UP , MEN and WOMEN Did.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:31 PM
3

But it's a much lower standard, isn't it a preponderance of the evidence, iow, Morely likely than not, iow 50.1%
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:09 PM
4

How does hateful rhetoric ever get published?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:07 PM
6

And here's the thing, depending on your way of calculating it, it wasn't even gender-neutral because he took several cabinet positions himself, and HE (and the media only counted that as 1 man, 1 position).
/r/MensRights09/03/21 10:16 AM
5

And to make it worse, that is a reflection of society at large. If a woman kills the question is "WHY???", if a man kills (especially a woman) the question is "When is the hanging??"
/r/MensRights07/03/21 12:47 PM
2

You are one lucky bastard if you have never met a person like this IRL, I have, way too many of them,
/r/MensRights25/02/21 11:24 PM
3

Here is another stat that is written, i don't know "OFF" to me. About 4 in 10 (40%) adult Internet users who had been bullied were targeted by a stranger. Men were slightly more likely than women to be cyber-bullied by a stranger, at 46% of male victims versus 34% of female victims. I am sorry but 12% more is not SLIGHTLY more IMHO but I am not a professional statistician.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:25 AM
3

Remember, a man must sign a form for any woman he sleeps with, not just the ones who become pregnant. IOW, fathers have no actual rights, if you have to sign a form to get a right' then it isn't a right but rather a privilege. In the US when arrested you have the right to remain silent, now, what if they changed the law and in order to have the 'right' to remain silent you had to sign forms to say you want that right sometime in the future. Now imagine these forms are not well advertised and in …
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:26 AM
1

Ok, sure, but imagine for a second if in order to claim your child after birth you had to sign a form with all the MEN you had slept within case you got pregnant. Remember, for men signing these forms it doesn't mean they will have any rights because they still have to do other things later on and in a lot of case within 30 days of birth.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:22 AM
17

I agree with your sentiment, but the actual registries were pushed by adoption agencies which is why the time limits are so short.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 11:25 PM
333

We have things called putative father registries. Here is the definition from Wikipedia. In the United States of America, the putative father registry is a state level legal option for unmarried men to document through a notary public any woman they engage with in intercourse, for the purpose of retaining parental rights for any child they may father. Now think about that, imagine for one second if women had to do that OR lost custody of their children. But worse than that is that how many men k…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 07:59 PM
2

IMHO, Modern Feminism (and perhaps it always was) is about two words "Free Stuff".
/r/MensRights22/02/21 02:08 PM
9

Here is what SHOULD be relevant that a rapist has custody of a child, imagine for one second the public outcry if a man raped a young girl even if only statutory rape and then got custody, that ALONE would be enough for a million mom march in the streets.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 07:23 PM
2

And if a man and a woman die at the same age, the woman will lose MORE life years because she is expected to live longer SO, this years life lost is also a bad indicator as well.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 10:32 AM
17

Be aware that feminists have changed tactics, they don't say "ALL MEN" or just "MEN" anymore as that is just ridiculous, the 'new' term is "Too many men" which could, of course, mean 1 man which is too many.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:25 AM
2

Good Pickup.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 06:13 PM
39

As the saying goes, "You won't go broke discriminating against men".
/r/MensRights15/02/21 01:28 PM
2

The problem with a ratio for me is this. If families who had a member killed by police received large sums of money, white families would receive the lions share of the money and that would be seen as a problem OR if you had to attend all funerals of people killed by police you would be attending a lot more funerals of white people, IMHO, ratios downplay the actual victims because of their inclusion in a group iow, identity politics. Also aren't ratios only really useful if you can show that if …
/r/MensRights09/02/21 01:12 PM
9

This should be in "NotTheOnion"
/r/MensRights08/02/21 11:19 AM
2

See, it would favour men because the things that get a person hired are more prevalent in men than women.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 10:21 AM
7

Worst Patriarchy ever in the west. I mean in just about every single measure of society men are doing much worse, from life expectancy to educational attainment to health care spending on gender-specific diseases. I mean sure, men sit with their legs apart on buses and trains and I suppose in someone's mind that is much worse than living 5 - 7 years more than the other gender but still.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 12:38 PM
10

Even if the 2% number is accurate, that is not RARE, think about it like this "If 2% of women coming forward to report a rape were subsequently murdered by the person they reported, NO ONE and I mean NO ONE would claim that those deaths were rare and yet they would be the exact same numbers and the exact same ratios". In fact, there would be a national inquiry into it.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:49 PM
4

NO, unless you were there with her, you BELIEVE they were valid not KNOW they were valid and that right there is the problem, you (and many others) don't see the difference between a feeling and knowledge.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:46 PM
56

AND because of that, my country created a whole law covering it and of course the max sentence is 5 years, YES, the MAX is 5 years for killing your child.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 07:18 AM
2

Of course, the industry is, hours worked is, education level is, experience levels is, comfort level is, and many other things BUT gender probably accounts for one of the smallest factors IF AT ALL but it's the one the MSM highlights the most and completely ignores the others.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:36 PM
1

The general pay gap does not compare like jobs in like fields but ALL jobs in ALL fields, so hours worked is very meaningful when they use that metric.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:24 PM
1

Where did you get the stats for that, for the same hours worked they get paid more?
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:02 PM
1

Do you mean calling it what it is, yes, that is classic, it's called being honest and not making shit up to suit an agenda?
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:41 PM
1

Actually, I misspoke, it's a gender earnings gap, not a gender wage gap.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:00 PM
1

Except the gender pay gap doesn't include overtime.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 09:34 PM
6

AND so is the so-called pay gap, it's also an average across all jobs and industries. BTW, do you have stats to show that in corporate that it is different?
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:17 AM
17

That's one of the reasons and as I have shown it accounts for at least, 13% of the pay gap (I mean earnings gap) which if you believe the 77c number is 23%.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:25 PM
5

While this has happened, it is almost always because they were sleeping together.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:17 PM
24

Execpt across the board, women don't work the same schedule as a man. According to U.S. census data, men spend an average of 41.0 hours per week at their jobs, while women work an average of 36.3 hours per week.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:15 PM
90

There is a part that is just as important and perhaps even more important, even in the same jobs, men work more hours. According to U.S. census data, men spend an average of 41.0 hours per week at their jobs, while women work an average of 36.3 hours per week. If my math is correct, that is about 13% more hours and since wages vs hours worked isn't linear, it means that 13% translates into more than 13% more wages.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:13 PM
1

The difference IMHO is the attractiveness of the man in question.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:55 PM
1

Once again, We are talking about false rapes accusations NOT about rapes that actually occurred, so People who want to punish and penalize rape victims are exactly the reason why fewer victims want to come forward, leaving criminals free to commit crime after crime. The victim of which you speak are the men who are falsely accused and it is you who won't let criminals free to commit crime after crime. BTW, the most feminist-friendly stats indicate that 2 - 10% of accusations are proven false, an…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 10:17 AM
11

learn to follow the thread instead of just jumping in the middle with a snide comment, this thread was about those getting laid off and neither teachers nor nurses are being laid off.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 12:33 PM
1

Lets look at the 1 in 4 stat that feminists like to claim as fact, that 1 in 4 women is raped in her lifetime. If we take that claim as fact , it already means that 75% of women aren't raped in their lifetime and if we assume there are equal numbers of men and women, and that one man only commits one rape in his lifetime it already means that 75% of men never rape anyone, but see here's the problem, we already know from large longitudinal studies that the 1 in 4 is wrong because it counts much m…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:23 AM
3

This is how I counter this argument. "Let's say that 2% of all the women who report a rape are murdered by the person they accuse, would anyone claim it is rare, NO there would be a national inquiry into genocide, after all, approx 1500 aboriginal women went missing over a 30 year period in Canada and that is exactly what happened and that is a damn sight less than 2%"
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:32 PM
1

You keep assigning things to me that I never said. And do you know you are in a thread ABOUT false accusations, not about homelessness, suicide etc and btw, I have looked at your posting history on Reddit and you keep expressing empathy for women, but never for men, even in this thread you have also done so. The reason I keep saying you are moving the goalposts is that you are, you keep trying to change the subject to other things besides the actual point of the OP. "the rape probably occurred",…
/r/MensRights15/01/21 08:55 PM
1

Again, you are moving the goalposts, we are talking about proven false accusations and if they should be prosecuted, and yes they should. NO one should be looked at with suspicion, claims should be investigated and if found to be false, prosecuted. What you want is "Don't investigate, just believe, charge the accused and move on". Did you forget to mention the boys raped by female teachers, which is pretty much in the news every day now? Nah, you don't want to mention those boys, that would impl…
/r/MensRights15/01/21 10:18 AM
1

Who says I don't. Once again, you are trying to construct a strawman argument against me by insinuating that I said something or failed to say or do something that I didn't. And that right there is why I have been rude to you. You are playing the stupid little game of putting words in my mouth, building strawman arguments and ignoring the very topic we are talking about which is real life false accusations of rape, NOT hypothetical future harm that may or may not be done but real-life harm being…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:29 PM
1

No, the male victim is NOT hypothetical because we have been talking about actual chargeable false accusations, not hypothetical future possible maybe victims. Do you know what sub you are posting in?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:13 PM
1

Spoken like a true feminist, Except those people aren't real, they are hypothetical. Please stop with the 'people' when you really mean women, you don't give a shit about men.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:21 AM
1

Where did I say or indicate that the majority of rape accusations are lies, I never said that and I don't believe that, AND it doesn't matter if they are the majority or not because we should still prosecute someone for making up a lie that destroys someone's life and what makes your argument worse is that you are prioritizing a hypothetical future victim over a victim that is standing in front of you. I sure hope that straw is not expensive where you live.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 11:34 PM
1

We are talking about FALSE accusations here, not actual victims of rape, so your little story about looking for justice doesn't work, when a person takes a person to court for rape and it didn't happen (which again is what we are talking about here) they aren't looking for justice, they are looking for revenge, or looking to cover up an affair, or looking to cover up being embarrassed. All the trouble, wtf are you talking about. If someone reports a rape that didn't happen, it isn't any trouble …
/r/MensRights13/01/21 10:58 PM
1

People commit insurance fraud, they commit medical claims fraud and they get prosecuted for it, are you also saying they should not be prosecuted because of the fear people won't make valid insurance claims or medical health claims. And btw, do you have any actual proof that a person (i mean woman) who is raped won't come forward for the fear of being prosecuted WHEN the only prosecutions are those that are found to be lying not just making a mistaken identity etc. It's also isn't cool to try an…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 10:29 PM
1

So would you apply the same logic to things like Insurance fraud? Or claims for medical expenses etc. So your priority is protecting a hypothetical victim over a REAL victim.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 10:22 PM
2

So does that mean we should not prosecute those that openly lie about such things????
/r/MensRights13/01/21 10:11 PM
1

Do you mean recant and if so, When has this ever happened AND if it has happened, how often has it happened AND if it does happen do we just fail to prosecute those that lie because someone MIGHT recant due to fear. We don't fail to prosecute for other things like insurance fraud in case we might prevent someone else from making an insurance claim.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 09:14 PM
1

It was only a couple of generations ago that men got custody in a divorce by default because they were the ones who could afford to take care of a child 'alone', then feminists invokes the tender years doctrine and were able to get the government to transfer the needed money to them.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 11:32 PM
3

No, the title is perfect, because that is the exact point of the video, that it's hilarious for HIM because well, it has to be, otherwise.........
/r/MensRights10/01/21 01:36 AM
6

Men do express their feelings, they just don't do it the way women do, SO THEREFORE THEY DO IT WRONG, or so we are told by society.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 01:31 AM
8

TLDR: 1 year for raping an 11-year-old.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 11:02 PM
2

Notice in the article they still have to increase the number of women referees to get EVEN more articles from women even if there is no bias or not much bias against women. Once again"World Ends, women most affected".
/r/MensRights07/01/21 11:01 PM
3

You see what we did here in Canada is create Anti Sexist and discrimination laws that actually create more sexism and discrimination by creating 4 protected groups and you can give preference to in hiring, etc. 1) Women 2) Visible Minorities 3) People with disabilities 4) Aboriginal Peoples
/r/MensRights06/01/21 10:30 AM
15

It's much worse than them controlling everything. They are controlling everything all the while claiming loudly that they have no power.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 12:14 AM
0

My thing is this, I strongly suspect that IF this is true, this child will lose A LOT more jobs than she thinks and perhaps she would not want her son working at a place that WOULD give her son a job with a name like that, because frankly, they are going to assume he is a nazi.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 01:15 PM
5

This is 2021, you could be right, but I would not be so sure, there are enough crazies in this world to actually do something like this.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 01:14 PM
2

That is exactly what I was referring to and IMHO, this index is a very solid indication of what is wrong with the gender equality movement, it isn't designed for any kind of equality, only for the superiority of women in all aspect of society, what amazes me is that so few people can read that index and not see the inherent problem in it. Of course, they claim it's just to make up for the historical oppression of women. My response to that is that "The women who we claimed were oppressed are lon…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 05:43 PM
3

I like the last paragraph, but you have to understand (and you probably already do) that equality does not mean that men and women are treated the same, equality according to feminists is women get MORE than men regardless of the context. In your men die sooner example, even the UN sees the equal line at (I believe) 5 years younger, so if a country has men dying 4 years sooner than women this is an indication of a gender bias against women in that country, I wish I was kidding about this, but I …
/r/MensRights01/01/21 04:24 PM
14

Probably less, they have a male they can blame this on.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 10:38 PM
1

They are not just dumb ass decisions though.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 02:09 PM
1

What you are saying is called 'a distinction without a difference.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 02:08 PM
8

Here's the definition: romped; romping; romps. Definition of romp (Entry 2 of 2) intransitive verb. 1 : to run or play in a lively, carefree, or boisterous manner. 2 : to move or proceed in a brisk, easy, or playful manner. This is from the article. Court records stated that the romps took place at her home, as well as at hotels when the team played away games between May 2014 and May 201
/r/MensRights30/12/20 08:04 PM
17

I know, but that doesn't really make it better, they work for the same organization.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 07:46 PM
1

How is this a pussy pass denied. ALL but 1 year is suspended, iow, she got 10 years but will only serve 1 year, sounds like a pussy pass to me, not a pussypass denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 04:41 PM
155

That wasn't my point, I don't remember ever seeing ROMP used when a male rapes an underage child (boy or girl).
/r/MensRights30/12/20 02:50 PM
342

So the headline says rape but in the article, they still say relationship, romp etc.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 01:06 PM
31

Or when 1500 (ish) Aboriginal Women are murdered or missing (btw, most (88%) of these crimes are solved) in 30 years, there is a national inquiry even though there are approx 3x as many missing / murdered aboriginal men.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:57 AM
28

That is possible for sure, I don't know, what I do know from audio/videotapes I have seen and listened to is that SHE is bad, really bad and yet, she is a spokesperson for DV, she continues to work and has suffered no real repercussions for her actions.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:53 PM
57

Actually , this situation perfectly embodies the double standard of DV. Even IF Johny Depp did everything she said he did (AND that's a big IF), there is audio and video tape and eye witness testimony that shows she is every bit as bad as he allegedly is, AND yet she continues to get work while he gets fired.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:46 PM
21

I would like to thank you very much and I really appreciate your comment, WHY?????, I upvoted it too because I used it to show a friend of mine exactly what I am talking about when I say that feminists can take a policy that discriminates against men and relegates them to second class citizens and somehow show that in fact, women are the 'true' victims of this policy. To the rest of the sub: This response should be upvoted so that it has 1000s of karma points because it is living proof of how fe…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 03:52 PM
3

But do they really have the same goal, when you have a sub that 'tailors' the discussion on things like MGM and have rules that you can't compare it to FGM because of reasons. That sub is simply "The Good Men Project of Reddit", sounds good in theory but is horrible in practise.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 03:50 PM
1

Yes, they were.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 10:10 AM
1

She didn't, she just hung up the phone.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:29 PM
17

I am just hoping it's the grief talking.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:50 PM
32

I am just hoping it's the grief talking but we shall see.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:50 PM
11

Thanks, that is good info.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:42 PM
4

Even if we assume that Johny Depp did everything she said he did and he was the biggest asshole in the world, the tapes of her really shows she was every bit as bad as him (or what she said about him) and yet, she has lost no work, is now being hired to talk about DV even though she admits on tape that she abused him and laughed about it, but I will give her one thing, She was right, she might be an asshole for saying it but she wasn't lying when she said no one would believe him.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:41 PM
12

The ONLY way that will happen is if fathers and their advocates figure out a way for lawyers and judges to make more money by siding with fathers, because right now, doing so takes money from the system.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 10:28 PM
2

The APA guidelines are the natural progression of the woozle, they are citing 'studies' that have very low credibility, low sample sizes and that use weezle words such as MAY, CAN, or "It's thought that". All of this is just the next step in dehumanizing individual men into a character, one that can be blamed for everything.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 04:55 PM
1

I don't remember.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:07 AM
2

Well based on her history as an attorney general in Calif. I would strongly suggest it is going to be that.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:08 PM
10

There is one conversation on this matter that I will always remember, it was Michael Moore talking about fishing and how MEN are the ones who are endangering the oceans because they are the one's fishing, one of the people on the panel asked 'What???, I did not realize that women never eat fish, are you sure, women don't eat fish".
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:11 PM
9

Do you really think we are not going to spend the next 4 years seeing articles about how much men hate Kamala harris because she is black and a woman?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:03 PM
12

I am sorry but no it doesn't. We are going to see 4 years of articles from CNN, MSNBC etc about Kamala Harris and how everyone who says anything about her past political decisions are just women haters, wait for it.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:32 PM
3

And I am not 100% certain that the prison population for men has declined, but rather levelled out. I could be wrong though.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter