~ archived since 2018 ~

Menz Issue 1- mid 2010

Pornography_saves_li

November 9, 2017

0 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Menz Issue 1- mid 2010
Author	Pornography_saves_li
Upvotes	0
Comments	26
Date	November 9, 2017 8:31 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7bw3n2/menz_issue_1_mid_2010/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/menz-issue-1-mid-2010.1174357 https://theredarchive.com/post/1174357

Comments

[–][deleted] 8 years ago* (25 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]theothermod[M] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You have a curious way of twisting things that strikes me as familiar. I got permission for all of the republished materual, which I selected for being noteworthy ideas that could use spreading. And it worked, very well. And a lot of those bloggers got quite a bit bigger due to the attention, and the link in every article (back then, the MRM was focussed on building each other up, not tearing them down like it is today). And I geg that youre bitter nothing you wrote made the grade. Thats life, get used to it.

As for "putting my face all over thd internet", thats laughable. Karen, Alison, John the Other, hell, Paul Elam himself ALL have hours and hours more 'face' time on thd net than me. All of them have a more significant YouTube channel than I do. My contention is that I was first, or one of, and that doing so led to repurcussions that latecomers did not face. Moreover, I and the others knew full well such things might happen, but did it anyway, to be an example, and to stand up publicly for what we believe in (something I notice you still do not do, despite being perhaps the most politically correct leftist in the movement). Only a narcissistic loser could twist all that into a negative, simply because he didnt get to be a part of it.

Honestly, that impotent rage is going to eat you up. Let go, young padawan.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In terms of seeking fame, the comparison was between myself and you, not myself and Elam et al. MY face is not all over YouTube, yours is.

stand up publicly for what we believe in (something I notice you still do not do, despite being perhaps the most politically correct leftist in the movement)

LOL! So, on the one hand i am hungry for fame, yet on the other hand i am not "standing up publicly" but you are! That's just evidence that you ARE, indeed, hungry for fame, while i am happy to stay relatively anonymous.

As for being politically correct, that is clearly a lie. The PC brigade do not refer to men as niggers, nor do they publish pieces claiming that feminism works for the plutocrats and that women are innately more violent than men. But then, honesty was never your strong suit. Now that i come to think of it, you don't seem to have a strong suit.

Give it up, Dan. Nobody cares what you do, which is why all your postings of this lousy little piece of digital toilet paper get ignored by everyone.

[–]Pornography_saves_li[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Pornography_saves_li0 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link