~ archived since 2018 ~

Nice Guys and their Optic Problems.

thetrollking

March 19, 2011

3 upvotes

/r/MensRights

http://notfrisco2.com/leones/?p=5951

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Nice Guys and their Optic Problems.
Author	thetrollking
Upvotes	3
Comments	9
Date	March 19, 2011 3:49 AM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g6vo4/nice_guys_and_their_optic_problems/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/nice-guys-and-their-optic-problems.1041957 https://theredarchive.com/post/1041957

Comments

[–]Glory2Hypnotoad 1 point2 points3 points 15 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ProjektTHOR1 point 15 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 15 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ProjektTHOR1 point 15 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]BolshevikMuppet -2 points-1 points0 points 15 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oy. Just... Oy.

We eventually just came to the inevitable conclusion that with A LOT of women, "The worse you treat them the better they like it."

It's only inevitable if you have absolutely no understanding of logic or reasoning beyond basic pattern recognition. Maybe the jerks are more attractive, maybe the "jerks" are better in bed. Maybe the "jerks" are actually nice to girls they're with, but simply are willing to go after a lot more girls (getting more "action" because they go after a wider pool of possibilities; they have the same chance as you with any given girl, but go after so many more that their chances are higher in total)

Then I learned that one of the great verities of all time is that girls and women are naturally hypergamous, and I stopped wondering why so many of them gravitate to guys that treat them like crap.

If I understand the use of the word "hypergamy" around these parts, it's the idea that women always want to "date up". But this contradicts your later statement. If women are after status (a recent study says "no", by the way, link forthcoming), they should always date the more successful man (which would mean either dating all betas (if they have more financial success in adulthood, they're logically more "successful" in college), or all alphas (the same argument). Or, of course, you're saying that the definition of "status" changes out in the real world, but that's another pedantic can of worms all together. Plus, of course, that assumes that everything else is equal, that the "alphas" and "betas" are equal in everything except some ephemeral "confidence" or "status".

I'm calling bullshit, mate.

Link: http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/casual-sex-men-women-not-so-different-after-all-28451/

[–]plumeria 0 points1 point2 points 15 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 15 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ProjektTHOR1 point 15 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link