She claims not to be a feminist, so here's female misandry(although I thinks she is a radical feminist, her blog name is an attempt to 'reclaim' the word from Rush Limbaugh). The site is disgusting so here's the take away:

Evo-pysch babble, religious dogma, and mainstream proproganda — all spewed by men who to this day claim to comprehend the angelic humanity of females when they aren’t raping us for being whores — and feminists have kindly and painstakingly refuted every one. It also needs emphasing that the vast majority of women’s liberation has been the result of radical feminists backing men into the figurative corner whereby men had no other legitimate option than to 1.) acknowledge some bit of sexism as actual sexism, and 2.) shape the fuck up. [Bolded by Troll King]

Here's their logic:

In order to distinguish those who are fully fledged members of humanity from those who are merely homo sapien, we must remember that humanity is a term bestowed only upon those who express humane qualities — specifically compassion is mentioned most often. And since we can’t say that subjegating those one claims to love is compassionate, we also can’t say that men as a class are humane. And alas, therefore we can’t say that men as a class are fully fledged members of humanity.

Edit: Oh, sorry...I thought I put the link in...here it is: http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2010/02/14/proof-men-arent-human/