Hello, First-time poster, long-time lurker. Have to say I'm a huge fan of what you guys stand for, and I think it's time that the world embraced true equality.

If you aren't familiar with The Chartier Decision, in a nutshell it's the legal enforcement of child support paid by men who are not biological or adoptive fathers. In other words, if you dated a single mother for a year and had ANY relationship with the child that could be deemed as "father-like" (maybe you got him a toy for his birthday, or babysat them while she went to a doctor's appointment) then you could legally be held liable for child support.

On the one hand - if men aren't aware of this, it's a huge slap in the face and financial obligation for someone they did not sign up for. On the other hand, if someone acts as a father towards a child for most of the child's life, does he have an obligation to continue to provide support?

I would like to hear your thoughts on this.