TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DoctorStorm Archive

View 12 posts and 1,033 comments by DoctorStorm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,033 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We need to get back to the old ways: Boys need raising and training. "gotta job to do, I'm busy right now" Male community: "us too. Holler if you need supplies." and that's that. Because we'd be busy, unless we're hollering for some supplies and assistance. Otherwise, we're doing the job these fucking whales get money claiming to do, but certainly aren't fucking doing it.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:51 PM
7

Some? "Everyone still jacked in is potentially an agent." The women that come here looking for affirmation, confirmation, or good feels or whatever, just talk with them and let them pass. We are not here to make them feel better about their sisterhood's 60+ year bullshit war on us. That doesn't mean you have cart blanch to be a dick, it means that you should welcome them, let them pass, and see them through on their way out. All western women are just potential agents right now. Fucked up, extre…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:47 PM
8

Indeed. I remember being there when the term first arose (Thanks, Matrix!). When it began, it did not catch on. Absolutely went nowhere. It was 2012-2013, people still had hope, shit was still kind of working. Now that we have data of the past ten years and can see every goddamn graph in existence essentially nosedive, we know that everything really has been...well...going to goddamn shit. These days, we are discussing how, by whom, where, etc., but there's no argument over whether it is true or…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:51 PM
13

I strongly recommend that all you young men take the opportunity to fill these voids with things like reflection, solitude, reading, walking in nature, tinkering with shit, and just sitting down and drinking a beer and thinking about shit (logically, positively, just thinking about shit). I am glad Reddit is fucking trash now. I am glad Social Media is a fucking dumpster fire now. This isn't a thing you need to replace. It isn't a void you need to fill. It is your life and your time. It is the u…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:59 PM
4

What a goddamn slap in the fucking face this is. Mother fucking fuck. Here, let me translate this bullshit horsecockery for you: "men aren't going to be wasting all of their money and most of their life tending to property where no one wants them, likes them, where no services and assistance are provided to them, where they are essentially hated, where saying hello to the children on the streets could get them arrested, and where it all doesn't matter because some fucking woman is going to steal…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:53 PM
-1

Yep. Yep to everything stated. I've been in this sub for almost 13 years, been helping men not eat bullets for decades now, and I've watched this landscape erode severely over that time. In my opinion, we now have the men who evolved and grew up and give a damn, and fucking soyboys and simps and guys who are more of a bitch than a bitch. There is already obvious infighting between these two groups, for evidence and as a working example. The way I see it, is that we have stoics and apologists now…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 08:58 PM
3

Dear feminists, When your dogmatic ideological insanity fucks with the money, the money fucks back. Also, feed your cats. See you next time, when government gets tired of forgiving your financial debt for no fucking reason. Sincerely, Fuck you all.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:42 PM
1

"With regards to dealing with the opposite gender" Be polite, never be alone where there aren't any cameras and witnesses, trust your head - not your heart, certainly not your dick, and don't date until you're in your 30s. Focus on acquiring skills/trades/talents. This takes time. Invest in yourself. Soon you'll be making $65k. Then before you know it you'll be blowing your mind trying to figure out how you made it to $125k/year. This is the decade of your 20s if you want it to be, I'm being dea…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:07 AM
2

Let them simmer. If you know that you are angry, poisonous, and toxic, then just step away for a moment, get some food in you, get some sleep, get a good shit/shower/shave, and repeat for a couple of days. If your mind is made up, it will still be made up after 72 hours. If you're just wallowing around in your own pig shit and need a moment to fuck around and repair some drywall and prop yourself back up, then you'll thank yourself for taking that goddamn weekend off. Litmus test: if you're enou…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:25 PM
-1

We already have. Win your battle, and that is how we win the war. I married, and now live primarily, elsewhere. My wife carries our son as we speak. These fat sluts can't even pronounce her name, certainly don't speak the language of the country we're in, and can't use Facebook to do bullshit fat slut facebook shit. They moved to make men second class citizens permanently. Say it out loud, call the duck a duck, and move forward with me here... They were only successful in rigging liberal western…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:15 PM
2

Hit the gym, focus on strength and stamina, and fuck like a goddamn beast. This is why, and that is the trick. The chemically imbalanced t-rash felons just have a shortcut, and it's called "people are trying to steal what I have, kill me, and the government is also after me too, also I'm high on fucking meth". Soyboys be hatin' the truth on this one, though. It's still the truth. Criminals on the run, high on meth, do, in fact, know how to fuck properly and thoroughly.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:43 PM
9

Correct. Your dick gets hard when you see thin, busty women fucking. Your dick doesn't get hard when a land whale wants to have sex. This is not fucking rocket science.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:00 AM
2

"Cunt." Don't say it out loud, just know it, smile, and walk away quickly.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:28 PM
0

Excuse me? You're excused go touch grass. We have no power as individuals, so our pus... Play the victim. Fine. I don't play along. Most are useful idiot male... Ah, I see, so it's back to it being men's fault. Grow the fuck up and move the fuck along already. Read a book instead of commenting blindly on a stupid website about fucking nothing.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:22 PM
-1

OP is legit and correct. Comments here are filled with coping. In my opinion, men between the ages of 30-50 need to make bank and get the fuck out. +/- 5 years on that 30-50. Younger than 25? Soyboys, nothing we can do for them, they won't listen, and they won't take advice. They won't even get off the couch and lift a fucking weight to save their lives. It's all doom and gloom for them. Older than 55? Too attached to the old ways, too boomer, too afraid, too risk-averse. They don't mind being t…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:44 PM
-3

Not necessarily. Maybe she is a net positive in the grand scheme of things, sure, but it is important for men to know that even a well-intention grifter is still a grifter. If for nothing else, than at least to understand that she won't be there whenever actual shit hits the actual fan.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:37 PM
2

"my aunt's hairdresser's niece's daughter was raped and that is how I know it can happen to me! All men all men all men!" "I just spent three years fighting tooth and nail just to keep my house and find a way to stay in my children's lives...and she's still fucking the pool boy while I pay the bills." Good luck trying to get these fucktard western women to understand the difference between these two "lived experiences"
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:32 PM
18

Water fucking wet.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 09:25 PM
-1

We live in America, Singapore, Hong Kong, and China. We spend most of our time in America and China because of where the respective families are. Once you work out the logistics and get through the first couple of years, it's a cakewalk. It is a myth that either party has to renounce or sacrifice. It simply isn't true. The logistics just require effort and patience. You should try Hong Kong out. Just give it a month, see for yourself. Not many hurdles to leap for Hong Kong or Singapore, but cert…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 07:42 PM
-3

My wife and I married in Nanjing, Jiangsu, PRC - then divorced and remarried once China became a member of the Hague convention (rather recently, I might add - November of last year.) Because of this, our marriage is now recognized by all other members of the Hague convention, which includes America. We did this to ensure the joint trusts and financial portfolio that spans two wholly separate cultures/countries would be intact and protected for the next generation (very tricky to do in this situ…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 07:34 PM
28

I disagree. The most chilling metric of all is the number of men who have cashed out and walked away from the western markets and societies altogether. The talent as well as the money is leaving, if not already gone. Best decision I ever made was to cash out, walk, and begin investing and living elsewhere. Fuck this clown country, let it burn.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 07:26 PM
1

A bit older than you, and I thoroughly enjoy Singapore at my age. When you do go, book a room at The Clan for a week or so, it's right smack in the middle of everything with a fantastic view of the city. Also, the pool is actually on the roof, and you'll enjoy this fact once you get there (it's fucking hot in Singapore). A week of spiraling out from the center of the city is all you'll need in order to have walked most the city itself. You'll enjoy getting lost in that city as well, the architec…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 02:08 PM
3

What I see most often in young men is the failure to acknowledge and act on the data and feedback from failed tests. I also think it's a lot easier and less complicated than what the OP suggests, and doesn't require you to play any games: Ask questions. Listen to her answers. Pay attention to her actions. If 2 and 3 don't match up, move along, just another lying woman, dime a dozen. Otherwise, enjoy. You won't have much trouble finding empathy in a person who is straightforward and honest about …
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:45 PM
2

If you have money and are extroverted enough to be civil and nice to people on a business level, yes. It's also a good place to invest in if you're still in your 20s/30s and trying to diversify because you're fucking smart.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:23 AM
1

Friendly neighborhood fucking therapist here. You should get more physical exercise and you should find more opportunities and outlets to speak your mind and get shit off your chest, preferably with others who will judge least and offer constructive criticism and feedback so you can build yourself back up to your own snuff, while letting yourself off your own goddamn hooks. It's just easier to say "hit gym, therapist, bro." - that's all.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 01:27 AM
-2

Saving marriage at scale? The women have to not be sluts (good luck with that). The men have to be worth a damn (they're dropping the ball these days too, just for obvious and good reason is all...but still...) The economy has to not be shit (FUCK FUCK FUCK) The government has to not be so obviously fucked and on fire shit (OH GODDAMNIT, FUCK FUCK FUCK, IT BURNS, FUCK IT BURNS) The laws need to be changed (fucking obviously) Shit and slut behavior need to stop being promoted, taught starting at …
/r/MensRights16/02/24 01:23 AM
24

College professor/father/uncle/older brother here, yet again. To tell you the same thing I've told you for over a decade now, yet again... FUCK COLLEGE. SAVE MONEY. WORK ASS OFF. MARRY IN SINGAPORE. SHUT THE FUCK UP, FOCUS, GET THE FUCK OUT. I didn't fucking stutter. Do it. (Singapore. Hong Kong. China. Thailand. Philippines. To be thorough. Don't fucking come back.)
/r/MensRights14/02/24 11:56 PM
9

Yep. Fuck this place. Feed your cats, ladies.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:46 AM
0

I pay attention to the facts and stats, and they are in lockstep with what I initially stated.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:06 AM
9

It has been that time and will continue to be that time until culture collapses or changes for the better of all involved. Men checked out. We don't date, simp, fuck, sire, or even look at these fucking cows and sluts anymore. If we do marry, we go overseas and we pretty much stay there. Those currently married with children are also checking out more and more these days, and those that are sticking it out are the last of their kind. Women own more debt. Women pay more taxes. Women don't have me…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:00 AM
23

Cut bait and run. You are dealing with a covert narcissist. It is only a matter of time. Hope is not a plan, and hope is not your friend. Time is on her side, not yours. Don't fucking fall for it. These women are knowingly coaching each other on playing the long con these days due to men finding out so much truth so quickly. But that's what she's doing. Playing the long game. Don't be the fucking game. Exit the game. And educate yourself on covert narcissists now, please. Please.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 01:36 AM
12

Cool story "bro".
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:21 AM
22

In western society and all westernized cultures/countries, yeah, pretty much. You aren't married to these women, you are renting them. You won't get your deposit back when you're evicted. You'll have to leave all your money, possessions, and children at the door on your way out. Or, you know, you're special and the rules don't apply. I guess. Any married man, especially in America, who has not at least locked his assets and cash up or secured his position, is a goddamn fool. If you think your wi…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:55 PM
2

This is a legitimate concern and complaint, and I agree with everything you have said. It represents a weird, growing concern, though... I was able to leave my shit country, America, and find my wife in China, because she was over 30 and so was I, so there was a sweet spot there where we were both neglected by our respective cultures and societies and found each other between the cracks. But the experience you describe for young men in China is almost identical to that of young men in America, e…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:47 AM
3

My wife and I actually love it in Singapore, specifically because everyone keeps to themselves, no one cares about you all that much, and nobody and nothing is special because we're all just trying to get off the damn street and back inside. It's a special kind of lovely which we have really come to embrace and enjoy. Also, we have thoroughly enjoyed not getting to know any of you locals, and appreciate the fact that you understand this particular sentiment. Ha! Fuck it's hot in Singapore. I mea…
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:48 AM
3

I'm too old to worry about the draft. My wife is native Chinese. No, conscription isn't a problem for me. America only cares about my taxes at this point, truth be told, and that's fine by me.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:41 PM
19

My experience as well, I agree. Being white and having no religion, it was clear I wasn't welcome there. Also, I was charged 2-3x the price of everything, almost everywhere I went. Short of explicitly shouting in my face, "fuck you fuck off you're not welcome here," they are pretty much stating this as clearly and obviously as possible. And good riddance. No one's missing anything by not living in the desert with a bunch of fucking lunatics and inbred family-money billionaires. I say that factua…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:38 PM
7

I have zero problems in Singapore, and zero problems in China. Hong Kong is becoming a bit of a mess, but still a great place in my opinion. Singapore is fucking hot. China has very strict and high barriers to entry (this is a benefit and strength in my opinion). Hong Kong is huge and only requires a passport. Countries with explicit western culture are all going to shit. Men have it better in eastern culture countries that are objectively more socially conservative than the cesspools over here.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:34 PM
4

This is a great example of something you all need to understand about the current culture, right here and right now: This fucking douchenozzle is just trying to make click-bank. He doesn't give a fuck, doesn't believe any of the shit he says, and isn't looking to rock the boat. The maker of the video is a real person. The person he is critiquing is not a real personality. Young men, listen to me, listen to me right fucking now: this is not the era of the hero, do not be the hero right now, and w…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:00 AM
0

You young smug pups keep making up goddamn words for shit that already exists. Men who are capable, able, and assertive are attractive to women Being capable and able doesn't make you a nerd, it makes you capable and able, goddamnit You wear glasses due to biological failures re: vision just shut the fuck up about the goddamn glasses already Women will fuck you if they are attracted to you, feel safe and secure in their position and relationship, and can trust on some deeper biological level tha…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 08:49 AM
1

Technology leads to advancements that allow non-human things to either replace things humans did, or make those things significantly easier, affordable, effective. When men don't have to hunt, women don't have to cook, laundry is a joke, etc. etc. etc., humans get bored. Without a challenge, we get bored. So here's where materialism, hedonism, and depression/boredom come into play. When anyone can do laundry, anyone can just go and buy fresh produce, but not everyone can vote, and we're no longe…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 10:23 PM
13

I didn't leave, but I certainly checked the fuck out. When we're at the US homestead, it's family, friends, food, fields, fun, and fuck off our property because we absolutely got those guns son. The question I continue to ask myself, to this very day: why are American people so goddamn fucking insufferable, needlessly and unnecessarily, I mean goddamnit, just goddamnit. Haven't had any issues in SE Asia, to be clear. Wife and I live a boring and peaceful life all over the map. But when we're in …
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:34 AM
3

Divorce will still be incentived and encouraged. Infidelity will still be an accident for women and the fault of the man 100% of the time. Materialism and consumerism and hedonism will still dominate the cultural landscape. Female friends will still be the same tired whores. Male friends will still be the same wretched simps. I'm sure a handful of women in the west aren't completely fucked, but modern western culture is, so it doesn't matter. Even if the most excellent woman in the entire histor…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 05:58 PM
49

It’s a global dating market. Compete. They are, by shaming men, trying their hardest to make it a bad thing, and signaling bullshit nonsense hard AF to foreign women as often as possible. But... foreign women aren't watching ShitTok or ShitTube, they don't give a fuck about what American women think, what they do, what they say. At all. American women are a joke to all other women in the world, a fucking joke. Shame only pushes the men further away, dear cave trolls and ugly fat women, but keep …
/r/MensRights20/11/23 12:57 AM
9

After being married to my traditional Chinese wife, and living together in China, HK, Singapore, and yes even America together for years... I don't understand why you young men don't get it yet. These. men. are. simp. bitch. trash. fucking. leave. These. women. are. trash. fucking. leave. Relationships are gender neutral. You know why you don't have guy friends? SIMP BITCHES. You know why you don't have a girlfriend? GOOD JOB NOT BEING SEVEN FEET TALL BRO. Man... Fuck all of this shit. Fucking l…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:22 AM
-1

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, because maybe I'm just old. But look, gentlemen, go to the hardware store and pick up about 30-40 cinder blocks, 10-20 backs of gravel, and about 50 stones that weigh roughly 20-25 pounds. Go home, duct tape the bags so they don't break, and put all that shit on one side of wherever. Every day, carry everything from one side of wherever to the other side of wherever, just so long as it's at least 40-50 yards. This is basically the equivalent of one side of a backyard to …
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:05 AM
9

Because it doesn't make a sound you can hear, and yet it is still absolutely there.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 12:54 AM
24

Because you didn't see the asterisks mark (*). They are not saying, "Where all the good guys at?" They are saying, "Where all the good* guys at?" good guy == stays in shape, has a stable job, wants a loving relationship and family, willing to provide and be the family backbone. good* guy == fucking come on now, I don't have all night to type. But it isn't a "good guy" by the definition of, well, fucking "good". It's 6s, and also a bad boy, and also tingles, and also... Fuck it. I'm glad the numb…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 12:51 AM
-3

Half of all FAT, LOOSE PUSSY, ANGRY, UGLY, OLD CAT-OWNING women. I mean, how dare they say "all women"! Where are the women fucking crying about "not all women" now. Oh that's right I don't fucking care, fuck these entitled slut cows. Fuck all of them. All westernized women, to be clear.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 01:41 AM
10

From society's perspective: Women owe most of the debt, and having them siphon money off of you, or screw you out of it, is how we get paid. Our rich-people economy depends on point #1 working indefinitely. Because fuck you, that's why. Want to have sex, you stupid little simp bitch? Well then be a slave, bitch, and pony up to the money gods for that fat chick with the loose pussy and herpes, and then thank us for it, you bitch. From a man's perspective: They need us, but won't say it, can't adm…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 05:07 AM
23

Because they're bitter cunts. Someone do it in four words or less, and better than me, go ahead.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 05:03 AM
3

I didn't say become addicted to porn, I said stick to it. If you say it doesn't go well here, then maybe you should cut back.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 08:49 PM
2

I just want to chime in on the "sexual pleasure" aspect of this, so you young men are informed. The women who you had "sex" with, they just lied there and got fucked. They genuinely have no idea how to fuck. They can twerk in a club and let some dude rail them on their backside, but the lesson doesn't transfer. So if you're turned off of American women...fucking cheers! But don't be turned off when it comes to sex. Women everywhere else in the world absolutely know how to please and be pleased. …
/r/MensRights04/11/23 01:18 AM
25

More incentives to promote liar slut betrayal behavior because GET YO BAG GRRL GET YO BAG, STRONG INDEPENDENT FEED MY CATS UH HUH I'm telling you gents, stick to the porn, work your ass off, save all your money, and GET THE FUCK OUT.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 12:57 AM
1

That was what I was implying. We're in agreement.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:52 PM
6

Show of hands: How many of you sat down and had beers, in public, with two other good looking blokes, like you, a damn fine looking bloke, just shooting the shit, the three of you, in public, having a brew. In the last week. In the last month. In the last year. Show of fucking hands. Yeah, it's like that. Men in the US are absolutely alone. And if you do try to make friends, you find nothing but idiot jackoff whiteknight simp cuck fucking assholes. I have two friends here, I see them about once …
/r/MensRights03/11/23 03:34 AM
5

Oh, and they're working HARD these days, son, it's ridiculous. We have a nice property in the deep south, what you might call a "super white" neighborhood (go fuck yourselves, you know goddamn well what I mean), and while my wife is in China tending to the household there, and I await her arrival for the Winter season, I tend to the landscape and do manly shit and what not. Housewives will walk by 3, 4, even 5 times. It takes half an hour to walk one way down this damn street. The only thing wor…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 03:26 AM
2

How to tell if the therapist is, well, not a therapist. "What you just said you like/want/prefer, yeah, that doesn't matter, you don't matter, this doesn't matter. It shouldn't matter." The "It shouldn't matter" bit is the only thing that shouldn't matter to you right now. Sincerely, an actual therapist.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 02:14 PM
3

meoof
/r/MensRights02/11/23 01:00 AM
3

Chinese. Married in China. Fire may still be hot, but it isn't fucking blistering. Several years in now, everything's still great, just my experience so far, figured it be worthwhile to clarify and expound here.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 03:40 PM
11

looks up statistics of this fact vomits cries Alright good night.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 02:00 AM
20

Yes. I fucked the prom queen. Was the prom king. She chose to fuck half the college instead. I reunited with my high school sweetheart. Also, fucked dudes she thought was hot. So, that wedding was clearly off... I fell in love with an executive, and she couldn't stop fucking other executives. Hey, also an executive, guess what, doesn't matter. I tried a waitress. She was hot. Honestly, I loved fucking her the best. But just couldn't keep dicks out of her... Then I stopped dating, and my bank acc…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:13 AM
12

So uh, I read this as if it was an uglier female Trump. They have the most gorgeous friends that are super successful. They have the best people. The best cats, the best cat food, listen, people have told me, no other cat has this kind of cat food. The best, I'm telling you. ... You know what's sad? The number of women who can't get a date right now. And by sad, I mean go fuck yourselves and fuck your cats and fuck right off.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:06 AM
1

I'm telling you gents, they're just going to keep doubling down, this bullshit will not correct course. There is no getting better. There is only getting out.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:45 PM
1

I'm glad you said "almost". Keep fighting, keep your chin up, maintain vigilance. Don't let the bastards grind you down.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:27 PM
3

I cannot count the number of times I have helped the helpless reclaim territory simply by stating, "alright, fuck it, nothing works, so take a fuckload of vitamin D and we'll talk in a month." And it. always. fucking. works.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 05:10 AM
5

Survive first. Then thrive. Then improve. Young man, I won't lie to you, it sucks right now, and it's going to hurt. Grit your teeth, knuckle down. Survive, thrive, then improve. Survival always comes first.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:58 AM
4

Legit. Vitamin D is absolutely legit. Absolutely legit. I am an actual doctor, to be clear. Legit.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:49 AM
6

Yeah, it is nice, I agree. The only times people give me shit is when I'm being an asshole. I like this fact. It's very nice.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 12:40 AM
3

Dad joke, incoming, you've been warned. WELL THEN SHE SHOULDN'T HAVE FALLEN ASLEEP DURING! CAN'T DO ANYTHING RIGHT, CAN I?!?
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:56 PM
7

My two cents, for whatever they're worth - outside of...two cents... Being portrayed as inherently evil rape-hungry pedophile monsters has taken a serious toll on our mental health and well-being, while also severely (if not entirely) removed our desire and ability to even interact with society on any meaningful level. Addressing this point requires our culture to unpack decades of shit, it's not even funny. The work that needs to be done is immense, and sadly, only 1 or 2 tasks are even vaguely…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 08:32 PM
8

Alright, this is going to sound tongue-in-cheek and sarcastic, but I'm being dead serious: Whatever you fuck you want to do. This is what you do with your life. The reason it's so hard to get a grasp on anything, find it interesting, really dig your heels in with hobbies and passions and goals, is because the whole, "where is the woman I share my life with," module has been aggressively and swiftly decoupled. This is a deeply-embedded psychological module pinned to the very evolution of our spec…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:22 PM
15

You should feed your cats, and go on a diet.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 01:10 AM
68

What the fuck. What the Fuck it, I'm done for the night. Someone douse this bitch with kerosene and I'll happily toss in the match. Done for the night. ... What the fuck.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 01:09 AM
12

At 30, you should see yourself at the very least being able to live in another country comfortably by 40. At best, if you want to invest in yourself, own land and property in said country by 40. While these bitches be complaining about passport bros, don't forget the actual fact and point of that topic: be global, so that you can have the actual options in life.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:06 AM
5

Ah shit, yeah, sorry. This one's my bad. If you want to deal with the dealers, sure. The premise is you understand you're playing a game. Yeah, I misread your comment. Downvote away, shame is all mine. Stay safe, stay frosty, and again, stay safe.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:01 AM
85

Yeah, I saw some of them and was like, "hey mom!" Clowns. Clowns at the clown show, clownin' the fuck around, as usual.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:23 AM
38

Then you're simp cannon fodder. It's your choice, do as you please. But know the facts. ETA: I misread/misinterpreted this comment. Don't hate on the manwhore, hate on me for blasting him as a simp. If dude wants to negotiate and pay-to-play, that's a-okay in my book, that's just street smart in my opinion.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:22 AM
44

I'm sorry, "hot"? No. You're not hot, because no one gives you money even if you got on a pole and spun around. Fuck this drivel entirely, but the constant dropping of "hot" is really unwarranted on every one of these skreeeee feed-your-cats angry feminist articles.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:20 AM
1

People love to watch the pond when the fish are being fed. Nothing to see here. Move along.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 09:51 PM
1

Well, hello there, fellow psychologist and/or clinical psychiatrist. Also, astute and, as far as you'll allow me to use the word, correct.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 09:32 PM
47

I'd say, "I'll be here all night, folks!" But I've been here for twelve years. So ladies, feed your cats, shut the fuck up, and watch as other countries marry the men you wouldn't piss on if they were on fire just to put out. Oh, again, feed those cats. Gentlemen, invest in companies that make cat food. You know, to strengthen the warchest.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:31 AM
210

This one's easy: Women hate seeing you healthy, happy, and doing better. They fucking hate it, and when they're allowed (it's legal and no one cares), they'll intentionally go out of their way to fuck you up. You aren't going to understand, because your brain doesn't release chemicals when you hurt someone, belittle someone, make someone suffer, etc. In case no one has told you this yet, men and women are different. This is one of those major, major differences. Don't believe me? Go talk to a ma…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 01:12 AM
9

They are survivalists, and modern women are hedonistic survivalists. I'm glad my wife is a survivalist. I am not religious, but kneel to god, for the fact that she's not a modern westernized woman. Just more of the truth being obscured by fat, bad pussy with dyed or short hair, "womyn" I suppose. I bet they work for HR on diversity, equity, and inclusion to boot. And by "I suppose", I mean yes, that's the precise and exact problem.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 12:59 AM
24

So, legit, they'll drug you and chemically castrate you, or forever fuck up your ability to make testosterone naturally. This clown just put him to sleep so he wouldn't go out and make BETTER CHOICES, but these crazy bitches are doing some irreversible shit out there, be advised. Side note: women are also going to change their game so they can get pregnant and not be drafted for war, so uh, yeah. Tides aren't turning, you're just being used. Again. Same as always. Be doubly advised.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:26 PM
4

Pay close attention to what makes a safe space, safe. This is a safe space because we take no shit, and we don't go out and give it either. We stand firm, speak openly, and when the cat ladies come sockpuppeting about with their other cat lady friends and white knight simps, we respond logically, reasonably, directly, and. take. no. shit. This subreddit is a testament to the power of a group of men who are very different and come from all walks of life, yet share a harmless, common, and vital de…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 12:31 AM
2

I urge every single young man to travel and see other cultures. As soon as you possibly can. You can't win here, but that doesn't mean you can't win. I'll make this simple - print it out and put it on the wall, follow step by step, and you'll have escaped this bullshit: Ignore modern women, outright. Ignore soyboy cucks and white knights, let them get divorced by the fat, angry women found in point #1 above. Good riddance. Work, study, acquire skills and trades, make money, save that shit, live …
/r/MensRights16/10/23 06:27 PM
73

Give them an inch, and they'll take a mile. When it comes to modern women, this should be considered an absolute truth.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:16 PM
36

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world, I watch fathers play with their children while the wife is exercising in a class in the courtyard. I'm not fucking lying.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:11 AM
15

This is an easy one: Because the women, who genuinely believe they can do no wrong and their delusions trump reality, simply turn around and say, "nuh-uh, he harrassed me!" And you are fired and crucified accordingly. No particular order. Next question.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:14 PM
1

You're overthinking it. They are in debt, and owe. They buy most the shit. Yes, from money taken from men and "earned as strong independent women" or what the fuck ever. But they owe money and they spend money, and this is a fact. We need to shut up and make stuff so money is made so they can be in debt and spend money. Only if the governments fabricate a bunch of bullshit wars should be be concerned with OH WAIT Yeah. And that's a wrap. Get the fuck out, men.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 01:22 AM
31

Why don't people just stop getting married and letting people live rent free in their homes. Seriously - if she's ~30% likely to have another man's child and pass it off as yours anyways, what the fuck do men think they're winning by inviting the state into a relationship and having a deadbeat roommate? Fuck western women and fuck marriage and fuck the stupid soyboy feels of "but but but she's mine and but but children" Fuck the entire system. Fuck it and burn it down.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:16 PM
9

Sell your house and sell everything you own and fuck these people. Rent for three months while you wait for accounts to settle. Rest in the dark, cook steak on the stove, eat as you sit on the floor and look out into this fucked up world, and rest in that beautiful dark. Then, take all the money you have from selling fucking everything, stick it into a cash reserve at 4.75%, and pick an island, any island. Then rent again, for three months. In Thailand. In Philippines. Doesn't matter. This secon…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 07:44 AM
-5

Again, I'm not talking about the clearly toxic parents. I agree with your specific point, and I also agree with many young men in America these days who decide to go no contact with their toxic, shitty parents. I'm just suggesting that we not throw the general point in the bin while entertaining the specific use-cases in these specific cultures and environments. Most of the world still operates, to this very day, by raising children to obey and serve the family. What these whackjob feminist moth…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 05:46 PM
2

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Both wings of this bird are crooked and the bird itself is rotten. If you're going your own way, you should stop following people first. Us vs. Them is a fucking stupid game, and the first steps on the path of going your own way are taken by turning the fuck around and walking away.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 05:37 PM
-6

This specific topic is tricky and we should be very careful with it. Once you remove the toxic parents from the argument, and assume for a moment both the mother and father are decent people (follow me goddamnit, just listen to the point before you get all angry), children should be subservient to their parents. It's not a brave new concept, it's how the world has operated and continues to operate. It's just modern, westernized societies that are fucking it all up right now. But children trustin…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 05:32 PM
10

Because women don't like men that much, they just enjoy us to a certain extent. All else, social games and such. The truth is boring, but it's still the truth. ETA: to the young bucks out there reading this, it's not pessimistic, it's actually optimistic. They tell you to control your sex drive because they don't want to fuck as often, as hard, as weird, as you do. This is just biology - you can't change them, they can't change you. You don't have to please every woman on Earth. Hell, you don't …
/r/MensRights12/10/23 04:48 AM
7

No. Women will have to march on Capitol Hill and have waves of legislation pushed through that does nothing but remove existing perks and conveniences from women in order to make the world fair and balanced again. So think about that. Again the answer is fucking no.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 02:02 AM
8

Cults be cultin' NOW PUT ON THE SNEAKERS AND DRINK THE JUICE BITCH
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:42 AM
21

My wife is Chinese. Her take on this is perfect. "Men already serve women and children, I don't understand..." And that's why she's the wife, and that's why we don't live in the US. Fucking clown show.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:40 AM
7

Oh fuck these women. Stop dating them, stop simping for them, stop marrying them. And stop thinking you're an uncle: you're roaming free daycare that alters as an ATM during holidays. And stop thinking you're a positive male influence: you're a potential target they'll sacrifice at the alter the second they need to do so in order to <insert reasons>. Fucking walk away already. Walk. Walk away from western women, walk away from bad families, walk away from relationships where even your worth as a…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:36 AM
0

As per my $20 bet from another thread about how the feminist brigades would show an uptick for the next 48 hours....I win, pony up gentlemen. And by gentlemen, I don't mean the white knights fighting feverishly for thy lady's honor.... I can't tell you what a man is, but I can tell you what a man isn't: a pussy ass weak ass bitch who scoffs at Nobel peace prize winning research in hopes that someone notices and touches his peepee. As the great Dr. Dre said, "you're more of a bitch than a bitch."
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:29 AM
1

On behalf of all of the men, please thank her for her bravery. Going against the mob is a death sentence for women, so she's going to need you to help provide cover from incoming fire. But if this is how we save women that decide to wake themselves up, then goddamnit, why the fuck not. She is already well aware that many women in her circles are going to swoop in like fucking vultures and pick her bones until they get some sort of explanation they're happy with, and this is why you need to pay c…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 02:33 AM
8

University data (at least before 2015, unfortunately) has terrific data on this topic, especially when you can speak openly with the police and they're willing to complement and supplement the data about actual arrests and charges relative to accusations. Oh wait I did this that's right shazam so here's the breakdown from 2011-2013 at a major flagship state university in the US: An average of 5 arrests per year for three years (4 in 2011, 6 in 2012, 5 in 2013), within a college student populatio…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:15 PM
18

$20 on the table right now, making the bet and calling it: There will be a 400% uptick in angry feminist brigades over the next 48 hours. Place your bets!
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:47 PM
21

Yep. Case in point, this. edit: Thanks Wolfshaman, I always seem to fuck that up.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:05 AM
6

And I'm not going to sit on a high horse and preach gospel and tell you what's what, because flagrant arrogance is precisely why this shitty predicament exists to begin with. Instead, I'll offer you a story, and leave it to you to draw your own conclusions and evolve your own thought processes accordingly. Where I grew up, there were mosquitoes, lots of mosquitoes. The people who lived there paid their taxes (oh shut up just follow me), and they paid their bills. Power, water, so on and so forth…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:58 AM
11

Reality is boring, what can I say. This is gaining in popularity, but isn't very popular right now. This is the boring truth. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:46 AM
9

I've paid close attention to moderation and moderators here for over a decade now. I know none of them, but I do know they're taking this seriously, and they are doing a great goddamn job. Better than we could hope for, considering no one gives a fuck about men these days. I am guilty of being angry with the mods as well, I admit. I will not express that anger again unless absolutely warranted. These days, I have nothing to say at all, except 'thanks, you fuckers, but really, thanks'.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:46 PM
13

Make friends with an agent and have this conversation with them, please. The first thing they will say is, "do you know how much fucking paperwork and how many years I'd have to waste to do this shit?!?! And then I'd have to pass tests, lots of tests...lots of them. Dude, slow your roll, we're making sure people aren't out to kill people or blow shit up." Or some variant therein. You're not talking to agents. You're not even talking to data analysts (they don't taint their own data, pay attentio…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:40 PM
41

Not entirely true. Note how they have to keep making fake accounts, or pulling from their trove of fake accounts they made years ago. This is what they do. They create tons of accounts and sit on them, then share info with the other whales, and simply pluck accounts from a spreadsheet when they want to talk shit or try to make us angry and be satisfied with themselves. Because they're not going on dates come Saturday night, after all. Just being honest.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:27 PM
36

Bots, 10%. Feminists, 89%. Feds...take off that tinfoil hat. Working closely with the feds myself (not one, but, well, think whatever you'd like), I know for a fact that this subreddit is no different than any other, as well as any other website, when it comes to scanning for patterns of speech and behavior indicative of volatile, hostile, violent behavior. In short, we're not special, and good. Fuck special. Just stick to the facts and keep a cool head when arguing, but the feds aren't in your …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:20 PM
15

Remain vigilant, keep your wits about you, and understand these man-hating whales have nothing better to do than to try and tear you down online. They can't in real life. So they get their rocks off here. I don't give them a goddamn inch, nor an ounce of leniency, ever, and neither should you. Instead, be a gentleman. Always be a gentleman. But there's nothing written anywhere that says a gentleman cannot refuse to take shit. So, refuse to take shit. Especially from women who have no other choic…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:12 PM
71

About 18 months ago they began aggressively invading and sockpuppet brigades were a common thing for a while, yes. It has died down over the past 3-6 months, but the current sockpuppet brigades do still come in. You can spot them a mile away because they have accounts that are somewhere between 12-18 months old, with no karma at all, and they're just looking to incite rage or generate evidence which they'll use to report and try to get the sub taken down. So far, this has not worked, because...w…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 10:41 PM
6

Get to Arizona at the very least, sir. Get the fuck out. Jokes aside, the fucker's an 8 point away from drifting into the ocean and turning into sand. Mother fuck California. North California should form a new state ASAP before it's too late.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 11:51 PM
7

When you see anything with "California" in the headline, just go ahead and throw it in the bin. 1.4% chance you'll regret it, so... In the fucking bin it goes.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:19 PM
38

Also known as: Tindr Premium. Let these idiots fuck their cake and eat it too, ain't nobody making them wives now. Cat's out of the bag, which reminds me... Ladies, feed your cats, because that island will only ever be on your TV screen, hahahaha
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:16 PM
2

You know, in most other countries they do care, and it is a big deal. Westernized countries are fucked, just get the fuck out, please get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:08 PM
2

I agree with what you've said. I've been working on myself for decades, so this didn't just click automagically, I assure you. Fake it till you make it works well enough, my argument against pick-up artists was because they're not even faking it, they're just lying 99% of the time. These are two wildly different tactics.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:04 PM
1

I was born and raised in the Southeast of America, known as the "deep south". I married a Chinese woman and we currently live in both the US and in Eastern China (Nanjing, Wuxi, Shanghai, thereabouts). I've observed many similarities in our cultures, and the disdain for homosexuality is definitely one of them. Unfortunately. Here in the "deep south" there is a similarly strange inclination for old-school fathers to hate sons that are homosexual. To be clear: not so much for Gen X and on, but sin…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 01:59 PM
1

I'm not sure how accurate this is - especially considering how fucking impossible it would be to enforce, given the sheer number of people using public transit every minute of every day. I am constantly in Singapore, Hong Kong, and China, have lived in China for years, and have never seen a women-only section anywhere. Again, because it would be fucking impossible to enforce, and it'd be a stupid waste of money, resources, and time. Note: I can't speak for Japan at all, but I could see it maybe …
/r/MensRights05/10/23 01:43 PM
5

Holy crap is there some real truth to this. Here's a story to add, a bit of anecdotal evidence for the point at hand: My wife and I live in both China and the US. I'm American born, and most of our real estate, as well as my businesses, are in America. I have to be here for certain periods of time, no way around it. For taxes, to manage the dipshit property managers who can't tell their assholes from their elbows, for payroll - there's just no way around it. So I often come back alone because I'…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 09:04 PM
6

Guys are suffering in western cultures right now but OH MY FUCKING GOD black dudes are dealing with the true bottom of the barrel fucking bullshit goddamn nonsense. I've always advocated for passport and GTFO ASAP, but when it comes to the black men in this community, it's gotten to the point that we should start funding them to GTFO ASAP. It's worse than bad for young black men right now. It's fucking obscene, makes even the devil blush.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:42 AM
1

My father thankfully taught me what's what when it comes to this. So listen up, because this advice saved my ass more times than I can count. "We are animals, like pigs, and sometimes we wallow around in our own shit. Even a pig becomes disgusted with his own shit, gets up out of it, and washes himself off. You find me a pig covered in shit, and I'll tell you just wait, that pig will be clean as a whistle before long, you bet your ass he will be, and so will you." Be depressed, be hopeless, fine…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:29 AM
14

BetterBachelor released a video about this about an hour ago, it sums things up well enough. https://youtu.be/yI97fgO60FU?si=5iPiGXpgwIBv6oQt We have reached the stage where these women have taken off their gloves, and will do whatever it takes to get their bag. So even if you're a 10 with a 10 inch dick and 10 figures and somehow achieved 10 abs....guess what... They're out for blood and don't give a fuck. I would argue, they always have been, and they never did, but hey, I'm just the guy who's…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:11 AM
1

Trust is gained and earned, not granted. No one said you were supposed to have faith in humanity. Humanity is responsible for that. Remain skeptical and cautious in everything you do, never assume people have your best interests in mind. Never assume everyone in the world is out to get you, either. This is the balance a man must strike for himself, with his own set of peers, his own experiences, and his own perspectives. Whenever anyone tells you your conclusions are either right or wrong on thi…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:56 PM
26

I'm not so pessimistic anymore. I'm starting to run into more and more American men in Hong Kong and Singapore these days. Brothers are loving them some Hong Kong, and Hong Kong is treating them rather well, too. It's been hilarious watching all the American racism completely leave our bodies when we realize we're just two dudes helping each other out. I'm a white guy, but I see more and more black guys in these regions (over the past two years, to give you the time range). At first they're alwa…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 07:17 PM
7

I remember this mindset. Then I started dating non-western women. mindset, gone. It's their raunchy, abused pussies. Not you. Them and that. I will not be polite about it or pretty it up, because it's the truth. If they can't feel a dick, then maybe they should vacate the fifteen currently injected into them. Otherwise, world's smallest violin.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 06:51 AM
13

I do not feel this way, I believe it to be mathematically true. Mathematician among other things, taught at a major university, traveled the world, live in the US as well as abroad, and have been crunching numbers and performing in-depth analyses for longer than a lot of you have even been alive. Judge all you'd like, I'm not bothered by it, but I do not feel this way, I formed conclusions by analyzing the data repeatedly over a long period of time. For this particular point, it was the online d…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:15 PM
28

I've watched it unfold for decades now. I remember 10 years ago, not yesterday, 10 fucking years ago, when it occurred to me, "it's too risky even sleeping with them now, they're fucking disgusting."
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:11 PM
10

ding ding ding, we have a winner
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:10 PM
6

Nope. They're cuck simp weak ass bitches. $100, it's just women posting as men anyways.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:12 AM
7

In a fairer world, women were already exhausting. Not in a bad way, I mean that in order to attract, marry, and keep a woman you wanted just as much as she, it was a lifelong fucking effort. It was goddamn exhausting for the both of you, and you were both happy to be done with it once crossing the finish line. But the tiredness you speak of, it's just on men these days. And there is no finish line. Spend your efforts elsewhere. If you're in America especially, save your time, money, and sanity f…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:46 AM
3

Fucking hell. This has to be at least the sixth time, in one year, this bullshit has hit this subreddit. Mother fuckers the science is clear, there is no difference, men and women both stick it out when the other is sick with something fucked up like cancer. You feminist cunts are going to keep pushing this shit until men start cucking about like simp bitches saying things like "WELL I GUESS WOMEN ARE BETTER" Fuck this shit, fuck it entirely. Fucking bullshit. The science spoke. I listen to noth…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:40 AM
3

Where, in all of history, were men better off remaining in place and convinced traveling elsewhere isn't worthwhile. Show me. The internet is just a telegram, just a pigeon, just a village whisper away. So you know more, so they know more, so what? Some people know better than others, and this is the entire point. Quit making excuses.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:24 AM
16

You young men really need to just bite the bullet on this one and accept it so you can get busy moving on with your lives however possible. Everyone does not mind, not one bit, taking everything out on you when it's easy, convenient, legal. If you're white AND male, take rule #1 above and attach a dildo to the end of it, then shove it up your ass. These rules won't change. So do something about it, or stand there and get fucked up your ass. And get your goddamn passports while they're still prov…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:22 AM
14

They are freaking the fuck out because the blood in the streets has pink in it, and the men who clean the streets went overseas. They are going to ratchet up the hate and shame and bullshit, they are going to double down on fucking everything. They aren't willing to learn anything, they aren't going to compromise on anything. This is not a war, and there was never anything to be won. Men are fucking tired of always losing, never winning, and taking all of your shit, so they're going their own wa…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:07 PM
10

Take some time to write down everything you love, like, dislike, and hate. Make sure the things you love and hate are deserving of such strong emotions. This will give you four lists, side by side. Here's how you use it: The things you FUCKING LOVE BABY, I MEAN YOU'D FUCK THESE THINGS IF THEY HAD A HOLE, HARD, I'M TALKIN' HARDCORE LOVE BABY, HARDCORE. Let these things inspire you, empower you, enchant you, embolden you. The things you like - do things or enjoy things on this list when you find y…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 09:16 PM
21

Indeed. Huge oversight on society's part. If I was in the dating market right now, I'd choose to stick my dick in a hornet's nest instead.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:09 PM
16

Ah yes, the epidemic of gold-digging hoes. You stay classy out there, ladies.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:02 PM
9

It saddens me, really. I wish I could pull them aside and tell them, "you're about to get fucked with a rake, and those people you believe you're standing up for, they've got the rakes, son." But we can't do such things. We can just watch. Or rather, we can choose not to watch. I have been choosing the latter these days. More and more.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 06:32 AM
27

As an individual? Just treat us like human beings. You don't have to do any more than that. When women cut us off without waving or walk into the store as we hold the door without saying thank you, it's not like our lives are ruined or anything, but compound this by 100,000, and that's our life experience. While the media wants to tell a story about how this makes us violent, the truth is that it just makes us sad. Most of us keep doing this shit, but we look down, we don't even expect to be tre…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 02:43 AM
20

Same note, but different song (pun intended) All the gaming streamers are fucking cucks, and they wonder why the feminists keep trying to invade and fuck up the gaming industry. I can't watch much of anything these days without someone making some bullshit political, about gender, about how men are bad, etc... Like, dudebro, roll the fucking dice and shut the fuck up, constitution 9 your ass already.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 02:38 AM
6

Two crucial details: He didn't ask for your money. You should have been on Rumble anyways, so the request to go to Rumble shouldn't just be for him, it should be because everything, including this fucking website, is controlled/censored/etc. these days. There's a reason our posts never really make it past a few thousand votes. There's a reason feminists complaining about how the men need to shut up gets hundred of thousands of upvotes and go straight to the front page. And the reason is: fuck yo…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:32 PM
5

And those suicide rates are only going to get worse, sadly. To answer your question, yes. Many of us, in fact, hit the "fuck this shit I'm out" stage. The only thing we can do is remind each other that the "I'm out" part of that expression means FUCKING MOVE. My advice has always been sobering, realistic, and simple: travel the world and live where you are hated the least. It seems pessimistic, but the approach has the greatest utility. It is much easier to be happy in a place where they don't t…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:46 PM
22

The truth is what we've all been saying this entire time: We are not the violent ones. If you want to find the violent ones, go look at the group of simps and libtard cunts who have been lied to their entire lives and are getting NOTHING they were promised. But the guys here? Nope, we don't give a fuck. You can't get violence out of a bag that holds no fucks. Also, water is wet.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:16 PM
4

One of the reasons us veterans take so much shit in stride, stick around, keep talking, and stick it out, is specifically and precisely to provide shelter, time, and space for men like you. You don't owe anyone an apology. You owe yourself an explanation. A full explanation to help you go on and live your own life, the way you want to live it. We were all once like you, because MGTOW and red pill aren't final states, they're progression and evolution. A decade ago I was adamantly against marriag…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 05:56 PM
4

I don't give a fuck how others choose to live their lives. What they do, what they eat, who they fuck, who they love, what they listen to, what they watch, how they mow their fucking lawn. If it isn't hurting anyone or disrupting anything, then it's none of my goddamn business. If they find happiness without harm or disruption, more power to them. "live and let live" has been replaced with "shut up and suffer, because movies suck and laughing at your misery is entertainment to us cunts" I'm so f…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:15 PM
8

Thanks for the pro-tip, sir, I'll see if I can find.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 12:38 AM
58

Joke's on them. Streisand effect. As they cancel him, I download everything he's ever done. And now, out of respect, I will also watch it. Whenever they take men out like this, I'm going to make it a point to support them and watch them or listen to them until EVIDENCE IS PRODUCED, AND THEY ARE FOUND GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW. Short of that, naysayers can get fucked. Also, Shitzzo isn't a human, she's a cow, this is why they can't try her in a court of law. You have to be human first.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:03 PM
50

Ah yes, so you saw the photoshopped, single text message from a completely unknown source, from back in 2012, too. Or no, you probably didn't. You're a two month old account trying to do what the media is already doing: spreading lies.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:00 PM
11

In my opinion, both. Give and teach, all at the same time. Show them the importance of passing on wealth, without forgetting to enjoy one's own life.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:26 AM
55

Young men, listen to me. Be a hero, but keep your mask on. Excel, but never brag, boast, or parade your achievements. Become wealthy, but never show your wealth. Forego the Rolex and Benz, forget about fame and understand wealth is far better than fortune. Keep pennies in your pocket and jingle them, because this keeps people subconsciously aware that you are a popper and are thus meaningless - no salesmen, and no bullshit women dare approach that sound. Live below your means, otherwise you don'…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:17 AM
16

I've heard great things about the hybrid learning model/approach. The most sane and rational of my friends who have children and are living in, and raising their children in, the US are convinced this is the only real, viable path forward if you 1) give a fuck about your own children and 2) don't want them to be brainwashed fucking trans cucks with a complete lack of facts for their "education".
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:08 AM
46

I'm so fucking glad that my child will not go to grade school in the US or any of these bullshit fucking westernized countries. It's seriously a "99 problems, but those billion bullshit feminist blue hair I identify as a pony tree because I'm fucking stupid problems ain't 1" daily realization and sigh of relief for both me and the mrs.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 11:49 PM
3

I hope they report to the police that they fucked themselves so it's not a false accusation of self-fuckery. The poor clown.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:35 PM
41

I don't know how many times I've posted this, but fuck it, here we go again: I taught at a MAJOR university. A university known for debauchery and shenanigans. For three consecutive years I posted the allegation/rape stats online. It was like...3 out of 45,000, 6 out of 55,000, and 5 out of 60,000. It was ludicrously and laughably low. The accusations were steadily at 25% for each of the years (2010-2012), but the actual confirmed rapes, well...as I just said. A fucking handful. Literally. And t…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 05:45 AM
2

Always ask these questions regardless of the scenario or situation: Who benefits, and how? What is to gain by some, and lose by others? Who's making money off of it? Is there more evidence for motive and intent, or for the act itself? When it comes to this metoo bullshit, these questions provide all the answers anyone would ever need. Instead...fucking clown show as usual. I maintain my previous and longstanding conclusion: Fuck this place. I have some real estate here, but other than that, I do…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:09 AM
4

If cheating with a man isn't considered cheating (according to them), then this really shouldn't be all that surprising.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:44 PM
3

Without punishment, there can be no accountability. When left solely to one's personal moral law and sense of duty and responsibility, history has spoken: men can do it while sometimes fucking up, but women quite simply can't fucking do it.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:43 PM
5

I have a much better time talking to brick walls.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:01 PM
62

I don't read that shit. I don't comment on their shit. I don't post any shit (doubt that I could, not that I would) If you GIVE THEM ATTENTION, you FELL FOR IT. Fucking stop. Stop it. Go your own way. Not mine. Not theirs. Yours. Fucking go already. Stop listening to these stupid cunts already, they have nothing to give, nothing to say. You will be caught in an infinite loop proving this truth day after day if you do not go your own way.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:40 AM
3

Because these mother fuckers are brainwashed, cucked, afraid, fucking stupid, and goddamn insufferable. I had to disown half my family before all was said and done, I'm not even kidding. And of course I lost friends. Damn near every one of them. Am I glad I put my foot down, left, and made a better life for myself abroad? FUCKING ABSOLUTELY, WOULD DO AGAIN, A++++, WOULD DO AGAIN IN A HEARTBEAT. Did I have to give up my American status, my American home, my assets, my cash, my career? Fucking nop…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:36 PM
9

Correct. Hell hath no fury like the scorn of a woman. They're just mad at Chad, and everyone else was nothing to them then, nothing to them during, and nothing to them now.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:47 AM
2

This assumes they talk to them afterwards. Hahaha, nope.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:51 AM
2

I catch shit here for "being entitled" whenever I say this, but look, this shit is true. I'm a fucking 10. Fuck you, I am, get over it. This shit has been going downhill for 15 years. To the point where even I married and live abroad, no intent on bringing that shit back home. These women are fucked. Leave them for dead. Or just leave them with good intentions and smiles, I don't give a fuck. But you have to leave them behind. Permanently.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:41 AM
6

You forget that men have to prove their worth, meanwhile women only have to appear. Just appear. Be there. That's it. And they get all the prizes. Not the reward, unless you're a simp bitch, but they do get all the prizes. And by prizes, I mean herpes. Look, you're not actually losing, just hang your head and look miserable and continue forward being an awesome human being and winning and life. And marry Eastern culture like a smart man does. My recommendation, Singapore. Second best, Southern C…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:39 AM
34

Take a look at the Tinder statistics. They fuck 100+ men/year if they're under 30. 50-100 if they're 30-40. and still get ~50 fresh dicks a year in their early 40s. Mid to late 40s and after, obviously nothing but cats... Still. You ask what they're smoking? Hundreds of cocks. They're smoking hundreds and hundreds of cocks. That's what.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:52 PM
45

For those who don't know this yet, here's a fun fact that recently came to light: Chads are pumping and dumping these idiots left and right, and hiding themselves like ninjas on social media platforms. Womenz be mad about it, obviously, and yes there's collateral damage such as good men getting caught up in the slander mills, but... The groups are the rejected 304s that thought they could keep a Chad, and are now stuck asking around if other guys know their Chad because it's less humiliating to …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:23 PM
1

Call it Granny's Peach Tea if you'd like. Still can't drink it.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:04 PM
14

My ass is grabbed and slapped on a regular basis. There is nothing I can do about it, other than write this comment right here, this specific comment. If I tell a friend that they sexually harassed me, I lose that friend. So these females can shut the fuck up about "not empathizing with womenz", we actually suffer silently. It's the lack of empathy we receive that society should be discussing. And that ain't never going to fucking happen, son.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:16 PM
2

I can't hear female complaints, because I don't bother speaking to females. 99 problems, but females ain't one. Meanwhile... me: "wife, are you a female?" wife: "yes." me: "thanks, darlin'." Fucking wild, wild clown world west.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:07 PM
6

I think keeping animals in general is a good idea. Dogs simply require work and attention. Cats do not. Not really. There's your answer.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:14 AM
23

Has no one taught you this lesson yet? When they say "all men", they mean one of two things: Chads they want to watch their stupid fucking video, but never, never, never will. All men they don't find attractive. They never mean "all men", but "all men" is absolutely an ever-changing, moving target. Depending on when they last fed their cats.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 12:21 AM
9

ShoeOnHead's latest video is (even more) evidence. You need to pay attention to women and their statements and behavior, because they're not lying or hiding it anymore. As the saying goes, "when a person tells you who they are, believe them." Nobody wanted these women (read: Chad didn't want these women), so they take it out on men. They laugh at you when you fail or are injured, they revel in your defeat and pain, and they will absolutely stand by idly and refuse to piss on you when you're on f…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 08:44 PM
29

Never be alone. Always be on camera if you have to be around/work around women. Always make sure your mouth and hands are visible to those cameras. Or just stop hanging around, working with, women, if you can. I don't even make eye contact with women in America anymore. And whenever I'm approached or bumped into "accidentally" I immediately become the most flamboyant queer in the world. If that doesn't work, I'm also poor - very gay, very poor. 100% success ratio with this methodology.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 04:43 PM
1

I believe the internet and stable trade/stable currency made the playing field more balanced. If you wish to make an argument for religion, please do it with someone else's comments. I am not your man.
/r/MensRights05/09/23 03:05 AM
1

I'm not religious. Neither is my wife. We are traditional conservatives from traditional conservative cultures nonetheless. I can not speak to your religion, or any religion. I can simply say, it isn't for us, and we don't believe it's necessary. I do not judge regardless.
/r/MensRights05/09/23 03:00 AM
14

As long as you understand that "remarkable men" is a shared delusion, yes, this is accurate. There are plenty of remarkable men who still aren't "remarkable", because there is remarkable and "remarkable" and these two definitions are wildly different.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:20 PM
2

If a woman is openly arguing, on equal footing and equal ground, without fear of injury, harm, harassment, etc., on whether or not there is a patriarchy... Ain't no fucking patriarchy son.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:31 PM
-17

hahahahahahaha Still laughing at you, and your 16 day old account. Alright, you can go back to being useless and ignored now, bye bye.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:12 PM
-21

The fact that we're still laughing at you shows that you are a delusional cat lady in America who is fat and ugly and envious as hell of real people living great in the real world. We spend everything on ourselves and our family. Not that you would understand such a concept. Don't forget to feed your cats!
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:05 PM
-17

My Chinese wife is currently laughing at your stupidity. Openly laughing at your stupidity. Thanks for making her laugh. She's great, I like to see her happy.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 07:59 PM
22

I still don't know how they're going to count or consider men like me. I married abroad, married there, US government doesn't need to know my personal business and can fuck right off. If I have a child, it'll also be raised in the other country. How precisely am I counted among the married, sexin', child-havin' fucks? I'm still American after all. Personally, I just want to see how laughably different the male:female ratio is, because women have zero benefits abroad and passport sisters are a wo…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 03:32 PM
29

Alright, I'll bite, let's play this out. Ladies, ladies, hey, all the females actually here and reading and discussing with us - question for you all: How many women have you known or do you currently know that employed this tactic AND ended up with a wealthy guy? That's it, two parameters only - female employed tactic, male is wealthy, that's all that is required for the count. Because I'm going to go with 0. Maybe 1. 2 or higher, and you're lying. This shit does not attract wealth, and if you …
/r/MensRights02/09/23 03:27 PM
15

I remember dating my (Asian) wife. She refused to accept my money, and paid for herself, for everything. Only once marriage (intentions for marriage expressed and permission granted by the father, specifically) occurred would she accept any money from me or allow me to pay for her. And she's still thrifty as fuck and transparent with the budget/expenditures even as she handles the entirety of the Chinese household's finances that I bankroll. I don't even need to check up on her, nor she on me - …
/r/MensRights02/09/23 12:20 PM
6

Now that western women have power and authority, you'll never get any of it back. Their fiction is your reality as long as you remain. Before, you could just not play the game. No winning, but no losing either. The game is now rigged. You will lose, unless you fucking leave. Believe it or not, it doesn't matter. Again, their fiction is now your reality. Simp bitch yourself into depressive slavery at your own peril. But don't ever fucking say other men didn't warn you and give you the straight da…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 01:10 PM
0

Your opinion means jack shit to me, and has zero influence over reality. Thankfully.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 07:35 PM
0

I am an employer, and I decide what occurs inside my business. If you don't like it, work elsewhere. This concept doesn't change due to gender or feelings.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:56 PM
2

I'm so far out of the loop on this one - self-employed for decades and married/live abroad... I honestly thought this was satire at first. American women aren't shaving or wearing bras...to fucking work...?? And pushing back when their employer says "shit shower and shave and come back to work so we don't lose customers you fucking fuck."?!?!?! Clown world.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:35 PM
25

...says a woman. You can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:27 AM
1

Because the state doesn't want to pay for these cows, they want the men to pay for them, one way or another. The greatest wealth transfer scam in history will be written in the books as "no fault divorce".
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:29 AM
1

Investment, investing. Invest. Develop skills in trades, hard sciences. Buy some land. Learn Mandarin and learn English more goodly than you already goodly know it, goodly. Acquire passport and foreign visas now before they become cost prohibitive or outright inaccessible, just file the damn paperwork and have it ready. That'll keep you busy for a while, and prepare you to get the fuck out of Dodge when you're ready.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:28 AM
14

This started precisely when female influencers began regurgitating talking points made by men in this realm. Everything you see past that point will be a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy. Also, money and attention. So...fucking duh.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:34 AM
2

Focus on the trades and developing your own skills and let the percentage of people who own the majority of the student loan debt continue to belong to an ever-increasing number of these moronic women. There, now you have no debt, nor any obligation to read these stupid textbooks. You're also very well paid because of your trade craft and skill set, and can use that money to leave and go elsewhere in the world whenever you so desire.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:50 AM
3

When I'm in the states, I don't even bother interacting with people outside of close friends and family. When I'm abroad, everyone is completely uninterested in everyone else because everyone is only interested in their own family and very close friends. Translation: I'm essentially forced to do in America what everyone else in the world does naturally, and western women are genuinely the oddity on all accounts. Because of that, there's no follow through, and thus the understanding of men not da…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:37 AM
89

The premise is: men aren't allowed to be angry or upset about anything. Right out of the gate, there's the problem.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 06:42 AM
1

Yes. That's the point. Women elsewhere held up their end of the bargain. These women failed. So fuck these women, go find the real women. Again, EASTERN TRADITIONAL CULTURES. I'm giving up. If you boys haven't learned it yet, then stay behind and die. Enough of us got out already anyways, so we'll be fine.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:13 PM
2

You laugh, but that's what they did. Even here I get regular kickback from other men about how it's just too hard to leave. I'm giving up on both genders at this point. The answer is: marry Eastern culture women. That's it. Don't like t? I don't care anymore.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:21 AM
-4

I didn't say leave it permanently. I absolutely love where I'm from too, and I will never sell my house or my land, but I'm sure as fuck never even going to look at women where I'm from ever again. My wife and I manage two households on opposite sides of the world. One in America, one in China. Whatever you want to do I assure you it can be done. But you got to start somewhere, so figure out how to start somewhere. Or marry a loud, feminist Aussie slag, I don't know, it's your life, I'm just try…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:44 AM
-7

Then leave Australia.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:27 AM
-3

No, he's saying that if you want a woman you need to man the fuck up, and he's right. He is not saying you need to do this for westernized women, but he is very much saying you need to do this, and I absolutely agree with him. Listen, my most recent visit to HK with the wifey, I was ashamed at these boys. From the dude bros dressed like Fred Durst hanging out in the hotel lobby hitting on the receptionists and making everyone uncomfortable by completely ignoring and shitting on tradition and cus…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 07:34 AM
2

They treat you like garbage in the US. All of them them. Everyone. All of them. Fucking leave, please.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:11 AM
13

No the fuck they're not. Men are criticizing with their feet. They're leaving. Bye bye. Track the trend of women complaining about this, and watch as it increases, while marriage rates decrease, in real time. Whatever play is occurring on the stage right this moment, it is clear, men don't give a fuck. Let them entertain their cats in the audience, also, eat cake.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:53 AM
5

Just... Fuck this entire culture. Fucking stupid. Fucking clown show stupid. I hope herpes evolves faster.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 03:19 AM
3

I wonder if the stats take into consideration men like myself, who married in a different country and tell the census and US government fuck all about my personal life. I mean, technically I'm single and not dating, if you were to just look at me on paper. As far as the future of this trend? More of this, I think. Multi-generational exodus of Western men who may live and work in Western culture but aren't going to date or marry these fucking clowns no matter what.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:12 PM
7

Two wings of a rotten bird. Men should go their own fucking way. Preferably, through the exit door.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:24 AM
2

We live in both China and America. We married in China. She can use her travel visa to rejoin me here at our US home whenever she wants, and I can travel there and rejoin my wife whenever I want. If you want to understand how "corrupt" Chinese government rules are, then ask yourself a single question: what government isn't corrupt? But go, see for yourself. Research, see the facts for yourself. You can't just waltz into China tomorrow anyways, they won't let you, so why not take your time since …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:45 AM
1

To each his own. We enjoy Singapore and Hong Kong, as well as China. Not like you have to restrict yourself to a single country or anything.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:09 AM
2

I travel a lot, and being able to speak Cantonese helped tremendously. The rules don't change just because you're in a different country, you just have to understand the system is broken here. But you approach a beautiful woman in Beijing and ask to take her to dinner? Well, enjoy dinner. I mean, it's not that foreign (no pun intended). Singapore isn't strict, unless you're a fucking idiot. I mean it, you have to be a drug smuggling or loud-as-fuck-drunk-ass-law-breaking-prick to get into troubl…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:09 AM
1

You'll love Singapore. Might want to wait until it's a bit cooler, though. Once you're there, you too can enjoy that vicious inside joke I just made.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:06 AM
9

Good for you. Now be smart, remember that good women are still looking for good, high-quality men so you keep at it and keep bringing that A game son, and give yourself some time to get over the honeymoon period bullshit before making any life decisions. If Thailand isn't for you, don't lose hope, just keep traveling. I strongly recommend Singapore, Hong Kong, and China myself, but to each his own. Godspeed and good luck, sir.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:55 PM
1

The best way to protect resources (both parties): geography. My wife (Chinese) and I (American) were married in China. We share resources, but there is no way I can threaten her assets in China, nor can she threaten my assets in America. We own our own properties separately, as well as jointly. We are transparent with our finances, accounts, savings. I'm not saying you have to go and marry in China, I'm saying that if you use the global terrain to your advantage, you'll not only increase your od…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:08 PM
0

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then you win.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 09:11 PM
3

LOL. Feed your cats.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:40 AM
6

Because they're too busy commenting in the purplepill and blatantmisogyny subreddits. Go away, troll.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:27 PM
10

"Feminists think [...]" I found your problem.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:44 PM
10

Fuck that noise. We have shared bottom lines. We determined this well before marriage. If I do it, she has to do it, and vice versa. I lead, she follows, we influence each other overtly and covertly accordingly. But if I do it, she better do it too. I'm glad that it has never been, and will never be, an issue for us. If you're a Western woman, you will never understand what I'm saying, and I don't care.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:43 PM
25

I understand your position, but I'd personally feel like a hypocrite myself if I took such a stance. My wife absolutely loves when I buy lingerie for her I saw in porn, then fuck her brains out accordingly. I'd chalk this one up to personal preference. There's also a saying, "it doesn't matter where your passion begins, just make sure it ends at home," or something along those lines.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 04:10 PM
3

We are currently observing the slow normalization of OnlyFans behavior in our culture. That's right. The pendulum is not swinging back the other way. Oh no, no no no... Western women have decided to fuck the pendulum too, and are hellbent on ensuring we all must eat their bullshit or else (just like every other thing they've shoved down our throats - for example, body positivifuckingfatandugly). Laws protecting whores who also teach preschool, coming up next! I've been saying this for years, but…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:29 PM
6

Adding to this: STOP FUCKING THESE CLOWNS AND AVOID MARRIAGE AND KIDS WITH WESTERN WOMEN UNTIL THEY FIX THE GODDAMN LAWS.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:14 PM
14

Ugly, fat chicks are always angry. I mean, do you need any further explanation?
/r/MensRights31/07/23 06:21 AM
99

I love watching American women crash and burn while I'm abroad. It's hilarious. Not just for me, but for my foreign friends, my foreign family - all involved. And I always get asked the same question: "are they all like this?" Yes. Yes they are.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 04:51 PM
-1

There's a lot of truth to this. If you want to solve the mystery, it's simple - there are two sets of women in China, those 25-27 and younger, and those older than 25-27. If you try to marry 25-27 or younger, it's a gauntlet. The women older than 25-27 are much more realistic and grounded and worthwhile. All the money, time, and attention is paid to the younger women. The "leftover" women get a raw deal from everyone, including society at large. Once the world figures out that China is sitting o…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:01 PM
9

My wife is Chinese, I am American. We married in China. We are trying for our first right now. The truth is, I could abandon her and the child and suffer zero repercussions. I could even start a new life elsewhere, marry someone else, and say nothing about it at all. They are very careful in their selection of a husband and potential father for their children, so we both know I'd never do this, nor would she divorce me and raise the child alone because 1) it's more difficult and 2) it carries an…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:51 PM
8

"don't bring them back" translates to "don't green card". And no, she has no desire to immigrate, and I have no desire to have her immigrated. When we are in America, she is simply using her tourist visa. We were married in China and live there most of the time. It's been boring, ordinary, and...lovely. Really. Just a peaceful and boring and ordinary marriage and life, just the way we like it.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:37 PM
6

Men pay the bulk majority of taxes. Before, now, and tomorrow still. So, tick tock, tick tock, and don't forget to feed your cats, ladies.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:37 AM
32

Before I married a real woman...you know, from not here... But anyways, before I married a real woman, I was in a relationship with an American woman (American myself, too be clear, whiter than white bread). We had an agreement: two rules. First, if you're going to fuck around, break up first. Second, marriage is off the table unless we're both certain and we know it will work. With hickies (bruises from another person sucking your body as they're fucking you) all over her body, I still decided …
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:53 AM
6

Great! Now there might be some good entertainment coming out sooOH JUST GODDAMNIT, COME ON WORLD, COME ON
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:18 PM
4

If you take a shit, put the lid down before flushing. You put shit into the air if you don't. If you take a piss and the seat and lid are both up, then piss and leave. If you have to pick the lid up, then put it back down, piss, and then wash your hands. Washing your hands takes more time than anything else, and since you already touched it once, why not touch it again. So that should be the rule set in my opinion, for both genders: Did you touch the fuckin' toilet? Then go ahead and touch it ag…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:37 PM
2

Pornography, in and of itself, is not bad. Turn your attention instead to the addiction to low-effort dopamine dumping. This is the real enemy. Personally, I do think you should limit porn intake so you don't lose your ability to be aroused by your own imagination and physical sensations. All arguments about porn giving men unreasonable expectations of women are made by fat women, so ignore them altogether. You're not some evil villain for being attracted to a hot chick in a bikini with a nice s…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:14 PM
105

SLEEVE OF WIZARD, YES, IS PORTRAYED BY AMERICAN WOMAN, YES, THIS IS NICE
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:14 AM
6

"bad at getting laid" Wrong. But I guess when you get your info from girlsaskguys, you'd have such a backwards opinion.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:21 PM
4

Christian college: they just lie more easily because being religious makes it easier to appear innocent and naive. Also, 5% my entire ass.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:57 PM
-2

Mother FUCK these fat clowns, I clarify in exclamation.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:29 PM
26

I'm not casual either. I don't believe it's a talking point about manliness at all, it's more like this... Let me count the number of things that require my resources, attention, and time when it comes to not being casual: Now what wonderful benefits would I be afforded if I were casual: 1/4 chance of contracting an STD, per incident Time and resource costs required in order to gamble my dick as per aforementioned 1/4 chance Potentially impregnating casual fling partner Potentially being appoint…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:15 PM
2

FUCK
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:56 AM
9

Fuck your map and fuck your culture. You mother fuckers created the problem, and you mother fuckers either fix it or get fucked. These boys don't have fathers, you allow them to be kicked out and be present only with their wallets, oftentimes forcibly so. These boys don't have role models, you mother fuckers turn a blind eye to every single instance and form of misandry and don't give two tugs on a dead dog's cock about men. These boys hate school, because school hates them, and you mother fucke…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:32 PM
2

This doesn't save time. If you want to save time, here is what you do: Oh hi we matched, do you have a list? Yes I do thank you for asking!!!omg!!! Go fuck yourself with a spork thanks for wasting 8 minutes of my time. 8 minutes. Beat that.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 02:01 AM
7

Something doesn't add up here, maybe it's just because you're in Canada and things are different, but I can't imagine they're that much different. In the US, you have to get all the way through three consecutive joint tax returns and the exit interview, which takes about another year to schedule, conduct, and clear. If at any point the immigrant tries to pull some shit, you can exit whatever sponsorship you're currently providing by simply divorcing them. They also have rights and protections, a…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 07:06 PM
116

glances at image, sees that it's California Yeah, that tracks.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:58 AM
4

Because women only swipe on Chad. Next fucking question.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:25 PM
13

Came here to say it. Glad it was already said.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:18 PM
21

WHO COULD HAVE POSSIBLY SEEN THIS COMING?!?!?! ... women most affected. /s
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:10 PM
9

As someone who has been very active in both the academic and private sectors for decades, regarding these fields specifically, I can assure you, assure you... Engineering, Physics, and Computational Theory/Computer Science is not missing out. On fucking anything. If anything, female leadership in any of these fields is almost always a train wreck, and even the women know it. But talent specifically? What is it you kids say these days... ROFLMAO-copter or something, right? Yeah, I'm doing that ri…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:08 PM
1

I give them a fighting chance. I'm not some misogynist after all. They can free themselves from their own cage whenever they'd like.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 02:17 AM
8

Feminists think they are a lot of things. Doesn't make it true, and doesn't mean I am forced to agree with them right now. If it gets to the point where they've hijacked all the institutions and authorities and rewritten legislation making it full-blown indoctrinated and legal obligation to believe what they believe, which slowly but surely this is becoming the case in Western culture, I'll simply never come back, that's fine by me.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:31 PM
6

Shortcuts: If they tell you what to do or how to act, do the opposite, this is what they want. If they guilt, shame, intimidate, or coerce you into thinking something, do not think it If they are angry about 1 or 2 above, it is because you are correct in whatever it is you're saying, doing, or thinking, and they do not like it at all, so keep doing the right and correct thing Finally, if it comes from a feminist's mouth, understand you aren't talking to a whole human being, you're talking to a p…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:24 PM
2

He's just mad because he's got herpes and now he wants to blame us for it. Let him go. Clearly, he's worthless. Probably isn't a "he" anyways, so...whatever really.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:13 AM
57

And this is why studies have been suppressed and retracted for decades. These women bring nothing to the table, and worse, all tropes and preexisting assumptions are false. No alimony, no child support, no payout, and no children. Because even when the man knows the kids aren't his, chances are he'll still be the better parent. The definition of "fucked" lies herein for these feminist ass-clowns. Don't forget to feed your cats, ladies. I keep reminding you because, yes, factually, you're shittie…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:02 AM
17

Yes. Women who stay at home and do fuck all, or work a job where they essentially do fuck all, have a lot of time on their hands. They come here to bitch about you while you're working. This is the full extent of the phenomena, explained.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 08:48 PM
8

Alright, so I'm advocating that men protect themselves from STDs, and you are...doing what precisely? Advocating woeful ignorance? HSV-1 is the mouth sore, why would they bother with that variant. They're talking about genital herpes, or HSV-2. Just fuck off already - you're either trolling, or stupid, and neither will warrant any further response from me.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 07:54 PM
6

https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/prevalence-2020-at-a-glance.htm I don't monger fear, I speak truth. Bro.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 06:51 PM
34

I just use raw logic, and this typically helps young men figure things out for themselves well enough. 20-25% chance you get herpes these days, be careful Women can lie outright and you are still on the hook, be wary When they don't get what they want, they can become very vengeful and petty - pair with point 2 above, be cautious Even if you do fall in love, the laws in Western countries make marriage and children very risky and poor options, be advised You can do everything right, and have won …
/r/MensRights13/07/23 03:43 PM
2

Let them eat cake. I do not care.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 08:22 PM
1

The solution is simple. "Fine. You win. Keep everything, and do everything yourself. Keep the entire fucking country. Keep it. Bye." Now that other countries are paying us to live there, there is even more incentive to leave this shithole and a continued absence of incentive to stay. By shithole, I mean any major westernized country, with UK and US being at the top of the list.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 06:25 PM
11

Anger is the litmus test. It's the canary in the coal mine. It's the truth-o-meter. Example: passport movement. Note how angry this makes women. The angrier they are, the more correct it is. They don't want us to know the truth, they don't want us to know our options, they don't want us to get out from under their fat fucking thumbs. But it's too late, the jig is up, the cat's out of the bag. Oh, that reminds me. Ladies, don't forget to feed your cats.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 06:21 PM
7

An international journal published this. As a published doctor and professor all I have to say is, goddamn, fuck yeah, get after it, and good on you, publisher.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:58 PM
6

My father taught me how to manage a business, a household, a family, and my person. The amount of money this has saved me is the kind of thing that saves economies. The amount of money this has made me is the kind of thing that saves economies. So the recession that's about to hit us is 100% the fault of these fucking women. History will write. And OP, take care of your son. I know you will, but do take care. When he's patching up some drywall in 20 years, he'll remember you. When he has teeth a…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:48 PM
13

Knock knock knock knock... ...knock knock... Yep. Nothin' but cats behind the door, next generation better invest in cat food now before prices skyrocket. No need to interrupt. Move along.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:50 PM
6

Without money stolen from men, how can they pay? Be wary of such an investment, I do not think it's wise.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:10 AM
19

"Where have all the good men gone?" In the general direction of away. Don't forget to feed your cats, ladies.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 12:05 AM
10

When will anyone ever give up free money. This is the actual question.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 12:04 AM
50

Summation: Jonah: "If you're going to be a 304, then I respect your decision and wish to go separate ways." Really, that's it. That is the fucking entirety of it. Fucking clown world.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 10:24 PM
2

They knocked out Indiana Jones, then rejoiced. Yes, that's right, they punched an elderly man and smiled as he hit the ground. What the fuck more do you need to understand this new trope. It's stupid, delusional, and so far removed from reality that it makes the entire concept of fantasy green with envy. Indiana would knock you the fuck out while also avoiding the giant boulder, you twats. And Captain Marvel hates you too, because you're fat, weak, terrible human beings filled with hate and Oreo…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 08:52 PM
27

This has always been and will always be a blatant bullshit lie. Women will always desire strong, handsome men. And men will always look up to such men, too. It's fucking biology.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 08:47 PM
1

Joke's on her. Dude's got gills, he'll just jump in the water and Aquaman the fuck away from her. Because he's a hardcore passport bro.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 08:44 PM
6

This one time a feminist was so angry with me, she was yelling and screaming and making loud, awful noises At least I think she was. I don't know. I walked away, and didn't look back, so I'm guessing here. Also, I don't care.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 08:41 PM
3

Indeed. I have no rebuttal for this. You are right.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 05:34 PM
6

This is a lot easier than most men think. I am not a therapist, but my psychology background and expertise has had me dealing with clinical psychologists and psychiatrists for decades. Just schedule that appointment, doesn't matter with who, just do it. Go in, talk for a couple of sessions, with the express intent on finding a therapist for your specific needs. If they can help directly, they will explain specifically how and why, right to your face . If they cannot, they will refer you to someo…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 03:40 PM
39

"OH NO THEY'RE GOING AFTER THE MONEY GIRLS, QUICK, TELL ANOTHER SET OF LIES" In summation, yes. This.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 09:40 PM
2

I'm happily married to a traditional Chinese woman and live in three different countries now. But alright.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:43 PM
10

This is the fourth post I've seen about this bullshit in two days. The OP is a two month old account. Gentlemen, listen the fuck up. They're trying to create a false narrative about how we are the problem. I mean, Jesus Fucking Christ, pay attention. They. Are. Trying. Everything. To. Turn. Us. Against. Us. Pay the fuck attention.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:06 AM
14

Because I help boys and men. I mean, fuck you lady. Really.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 01:43 AM
52

Welcome to the world of "brainwash the next generation" Take away fathers from children Change online sources Fuck Rayray and Chad Lie to a simp bitch of a man about Rayray and Chad's child being their child and their responsibility Revel as child grows up thinking he's a monster, after reading wiki and listening to his angel mother Joke's on them, though. Just look at the numbers. They can't make it to step number 4, and thus step number 5 is never realized. AND OH HOW THEY LOVE TO TIKTOK BITCH…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 01:40 AM
5

Lawyer, file. Do it now, or wake up tomorrow and ask the same questions again. Then the day after that, then after that. You deserve to know if it's your child or not. If it isn't, you dodge two bullets. If it is, you dodge one. If you do nothing, you get hit at least once, possibly twice, and there is no "at most" because you've got 18 years of bullshit ahead of you where more bullets will unquestionably come flying your way. If she is genuine, then she will forgive you for having doubts before…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 07:03 PM
1

Last time I was in a pharmacy (Walgreens, Southeast US, about two months ago), I noticed OTC paternity tests on the shelves. Just FYI for those of you for whom this information may be relevant and useful.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:56 PM
48

"Men know, but women unaware, because men actually don't give a fuck."
/r/MensRights05/07/23 11:24 PM
1

I don't know ask Pearl. ETA this feminist tried to bait me, reported me for absolutely nothing, then deleted everything. Cool story, bro.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:39 AM
-2

I don't know ask Pearl.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:37 AM
-1

I don't know ask Pearl.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:35 AM
-2

I didn't downvote you, it's all good. Just pointing it out. ... ...bot. :D
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:34 AM
0

I don't have to imagine. Every man paying taxes in America right now is paying for those kids. This is a fact. Also, your account is one month old, and your username smacks of "I'm a bot". Just stating the obvious.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:29 AM
1

I agree with the message she speaks. My point is, other people brought the message to us first, she's just capitalizing on it. Because she's a woman. So drink it up if you'd like, since she's a woman, but you're just meta-simping. Not talking to you, talking to the men out there who continue to whiteknight and simp LIKE FUCKING BITCHES.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:23 AM
5

I am a professor. I know.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:03 AM
13

Indeed. I see you're an educated man. Now I really hate you. /end Tombstone quote
/r/MensRights05/07/23 01:15 AM
53

Heads up: Pearl is a grifter. Everything she says is stolen from males broadcasting on YouTube and Rumble. Look it up, see for yourself. She isn't the first grifter in this realm, and she won't be the last.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:50 AM
13

Man, we're really kicking the hornet's nest here, threatening all of their passive and recurring revenue streams. Pretty soon, we'll live in a world where cheating wives have to get a job after divorce and broke, and the child they had with another man is their sole responsibility. What a terrible world that world be! Fucking clowns. eats popcorn, laughs
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:46 AM
1

Good, then you're on the right track. When you're ready, go to the Philippines, then Singapore, then Hong Kong. As my mother told me, I will tell you: Don't just be strong, stay strong, because you have to care about you or no one else ever will.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:39 AM
1

I had an ex-wife try to take half my empire. Millions of dollars. Try, being the operative word. Since then, no contact with Western, modern women. Do you know how many problems I've had since going no contact? None. Zero problems. Zero.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:33 AM
5

I accept the fact that I'm angry and hostile and vulnerable and breaking down and about to go off like an atomic fucking bomb, then I distance myself and do something destructive. I've got this concrete slab and wall of cinderblocks out near one of the ponds in my forest, and I'll blow shit up out there, or take things that have been slowly pissing me off and destroy them with a sledgehammer and/or shotgun (Office Space style, obviously)... And the thing that usually calms me down? I don't clean…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:26 PM
3

"I just saved $500k on my divorce by switching to MGTOW instead of using marriage."
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:22 PM
43

In other words, they fear having to make their own money. Cry me a river. Then drown in it.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:29 PM
22

I’ve been watching mostly pre 2000 movies lately. Bingo. I'm just waiting this out, as I enjoy my 20TB of series, movies, and games made since 1980. I can poopsock Battlestar Galactica, The Office, Bleach, Yu Yu, etc. etc. etc., longer than these clowns can hold the media industry hostage. I can also watch Tombstone every night, gladly, because the alternative is woke ass fucking garbage, so it's not like I'm missing anything. Cancelled Netflix last year. Never had cable. While Prime Video is al…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 02:11 AM
2

No need to link to other subs, we're talking about our comments here. Simply copy and pasting would be sufficient, because we have the ability to check for ourselves at the end of the day. Besides, we can always np the links and stick to the rules. No worries.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 01:09 AM
10

I feel like there's a solid joke here just waiting to be told... What do you call a woman who no one has sex with? A feminist. Come on, someone with a slicker quill help me out here. There's definitely a goldmine of jokes for the topic of women who are involuntarily celibate. And no, this is not hypocrisy. They shot first at male incels, I'm just firing back. They're more than welcome to keep firing, because we've already heard it all anyways.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:15 PM
10

I have seen a lot of videos recently about passport sisters (female version of passport bros) broken and crying because their hookup in Dubai or France or wherever did something awful to them - like, urinate on them, or actually beat them. I have found that when women talk, they are actually talking to a very specific subset of people. Because they think we can all read their minds, they may believe we know who they're talking about. I know, and you know, and we know...we do not know these thing…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:38 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that happened to you. I just hope the men here understand it's the green card seekers. It's important for them to understand that Westernized women are the problem, and to fear Westernized, modern women, not all women.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 08:11 PM
6

Note the final point, all: all for a green card. If a green card is involved, bail. Otherwise, don't let your paranoia destroy your chance to live a normal and healthy life abroad. Because American women are trash, and they love dissuading you from looking elsewhere. Be advised. ETA Oh shit it's my cake day.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 07:47 PM
-1

So, statistics.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 05:03 AM
1

Everywhere.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 03:58 AM
-1

Ran this through an AI script to determine if the two day old account OP is a female. 98% female. 100% under 30 years of age. Good night.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:11 AM
13

I lived most of my life in America, the land of the proud and the free! I suffered, and no one cared. Not the government, not the state, and unfortunately not even my family. Whatever terrible thing you are thinking I might say right now: yes. Most likely, that. Just add it all up. So I fucking left. I don't believe men don't matter in western societies. I know they don't. I know it.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:08 AM
3

If by interesting you mean telling, then yes. No different than freshman in their first seminar. Trying to teach those kids was like trying to teach a brick fucking wall. They just parrot mindlessly and learn nothing, and there's fuck all you can do about it except observe the disgrace.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 10:41 AM
1

I wouldn't hate to say it, I'd gladly say it. Please, don't come here, unless you already have a family and can hunker down in a community and live your life peacefully away from big cities and stupid people. There is a war going on here, yes, I agree, but it's not the war most people see. The war is rich against the poor. Everything else is static to keep us distracted. We're here in Men's Rights because one of the bullshit wars is men vs. women. Unfortunately, women believed it was an actual w…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 10:31 PM
6

As I've been saying for some time now, guys, this is not about taking down their shit talking rooms. It isn't. This was a win, and is still a win. Take the win. The win? We know. We know what they're doing. We know how they're doing it. We know it for a fact. They cannot gaslight us, they cannot lie to us, they cannot hide in the dark and wait for another simp. Hell, even Chad knows, and even Chad's not having it. Take the win, and reject western women outright. Stop simping, live your life. Don…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:32 PM
9

Are we supposed to adapt to your wife's feelings? Or should we instead do what we have done for thousands of years? I respect the admiration you have for your wife. I do not think society should operate according to the pattern of her feelings. This, I believe, is the current rot of our culture. Not your wife, mind you. I'm sure she's lovely, and I'd never insult another man's wife. Still, I hope you see my point here.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:34 AM
1

Welcome to the men's club. We give a shit, but don't give a shit. Holding a grudge is what women do. Herein lies the sole and key difference.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 12:40 AM
3

I gave all my students As and focused on them actually learning something, and then denied the tenure position because internal politics is fucking stupid and the other professors were shit-sniffing asshats that made me rather sell my soul to the devil for a nickle than have a single beer with. So yeah, you'd have liked me as a professor as well, although I'd box you around the ears for caring about grades and grill your ass hard on whether or not you can prove you know the goddamn material. And…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:43 PM
7

Wrong? Nah. We rub each other the wrong ways sometimes. There's no room or time to explain here, and that's why I volleyed a practical observation and plausible reason as to why that was, for you, earlier just now. Remember that time you bit someone's head off for fucking nothing? Yeah, it happens, it's like that. Nothing more, nothing less. But I personally don't see any wrong here, if it helps. Not from either of you.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:37 PM
17

Lesson: stop being a simp fucking cuck. All of you. Just don't do it.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:33 PM
12

The post was made around the time most people get off work. It's probably just some edge man, don't worry about.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:32 PM
7

Sitting on multiple PhDs, mathematics being the underpinning of most of them, and hell, even taught it for a while university level - so yeah, I know, I fucking know. Thank you for emphasizing the absurdity of the laughable sampling count, I'm still yelling at the monitors, thus my tone is a bit edgy. Apologies in advance.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:27 PM
24

Ugh. You are relentless. The study only sampled 515 patients. 515. That's all. That's a fucking laughable sample. Also, it was heavily criticized and ultimately withdrawn from the community as a viable source. How the hell can you make it all the way to pubmed to cherry pick and not dig any fucking deeper than the objectively disqualified and shunned publications that serve your bullshit narrative? Don't answer. I don't care.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 09:10 PM
139

This. Seriously. How in the fuck are we even talking about her feelings. The dude is fucking dead. Fucking dead. The fuck.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 09:07 PM
24

"A total of 515 patients were [...]" As I said fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:58 PM
26

Incorrect. The truth is, the numbers are about even, and both genders actually knuckle down in such scenarios. Both men and women stick around more often in such scenarios, in other words. So fuck off with your magically plucked 7x multiplier which we all know came straight out of your ass.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:52 PM
23

Who is supposed to pay her? Men. So that's what has happened, and that is what will continue to happen. If you're a man in America, you will be paying for women who don't want you, children who aren't yours, and people who wouldn't piss on you even if you were on fire. The government will tax you indefinitely and severely until you die, and if need be, draft your ass to go and die somewhere else in the world. Seriously, fuck this entire culture. Men's Rights needs to become, "fuck this entire cu…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:13 PM
4

Your first sentence states passport bros are toxic, according to your personal opinion. Your assumption, based on your reasoning, is that passport bros exist only because American women are problematic, then you write them off entirely because you personally wouldn't leave the country and you personally believe you've learned how to deal with American women. I replied with 5 additional reasons, which aren't my opinion but verifiable facts (save for the first point, which no one will ever know th…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 01:59 PM
7

American women becoming more tolerable doesn't fix: their 100+ body count from the past few decades, unless you're literally just starting to date right now completely fucked family court system completely fucked laws completely fucked legal system (lawyers make more by going after the man, and everyone knows this, it's not some secret - government pays more to go after men too. Again, not a secret.) completely fucked dating pool (remove obese women, women with children, and obese women with chi…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 01:42 PM
2

I second this opinion/perspective and strongly advise men to take it seriously. Going abroad doesn't fix women. Going into more traditional cultures and countries can sometimes simply make the odds of success less shitty. You're still going to have to search, vet, court, and be dating/marriage material yourself. If you think being a passport bro merely requires a passport, stay the fuck at home, we don't need you out here, and the real passport bros will likely put you in your place when you com…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 01:38 PM
1

There is one question that will absolutely guide you through the darkness: "Would I rather have the abuse, or the absence?" Let this guide you. Once you can see some light, but have no fucking idea which direction to go, the next question kicks in: "Where am I in 10 years, and why?" So would you rather have the abuse, or the person's absence, which hurts less, which is better for you? And in 10 years, if you choose abuse, did they help you get there, or hinder you severely? Time, loyalty, and tr…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 03:43 AM
0

You are a prime example as to why I'm glad this place is now dead (Reddit, at large). So, bitch away. Whine and bitch and moan and cry. I do not care. I spent 12 years saving men from worthless cur like you. Many souls saved. Your nagging comments, I care not. Don't forget to feed your cats.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 04:01 AM
0

Listen, take the win. Take the win. I don't think restricting anyone's ability to speak in private is a good banner to crowd under, and focusing on the toxic spaces that are doxxing and slandering people is a healthier and easier approach. So instead of being wary or concerned of replacements, step back and realize the win, then take the win and go. The win: women lost the ability to gaslight men, call men paranoid, accuse men of being immature, etc. etc. etc., as it relates to only fucking Chad…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:20 PM
13

The best, and only, response to these clowns is as follows: "I agree with you, because as you can see, I am not looking at porn or masturbating right now. Later on, I will disagree with you, but do not worry, I will not bother you about it. Now fuck off."
/r/MensRights15/06/23 05:31 PM
2

They call the cops on you for harassment, and then the page is taken down. Remember you were arrested first. Just focus on addressing the harassment, or just get off Facebook and refuse to date women who actively use the pages. But fire with fire when they're the ones who can sic the cops on you...gentlemen...be careful.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:08 PM
8

Invite her to coffee where you get coffee every morning. She doesn't show, you have your coffee. She shows, buy her a cup. Stop spending all goddamn day preparing for a dinner date where you may or may not pretend to be all big and bad about not paying for the salad. Get it the fuck together men. You're playing their game. Live your life, and invite them to your morning coffee already.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 04:39 AM
2

I am a psychologist. Transgenderism has been in the DSM for a long, long time. Given your account is 22 days old, I think you're just trying to bait the people here into saying something inflammatory. Unfortunately for you, I do know the psychology you are grossly butchering. Good try, though. I guess.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:36 PM
1

I've been programming and developing and engineering for longer than a lot of you have been alive. By my observations, anything remotely related to Men's Rights is muted temporarily, dampened (only shown to a subset of readers), silenced outright, or even rewritten before being shown to others (oh yes, you read that correctly, I said rewritten). So you're not crazy. Pay close attention to how long it takes for others to comment or vote or like. Pay close attention to the wild responses that seem…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:29 PM
3

I refuse to work in a hostile work environment where I pay to work, I am hated for a plethora of reasons that I have no control over, am not responsible or accountable, and I did not contribute to whatsoever, and the truth is irrelevant because someone's vengeful heart and a half-baked fantasy can directly ruin the entirety of my actual life. tl;dr: no.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:50 PM
4

Very true. Harder to find, but not dead, I agree.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 03:42 PM
39

When you remove yourself from the Westernized bubble, you see intellectual curiosity and scientific method is still very much valued. The signal-to-noise ratio is absurdly low right now, especially in western culture. It's important to understand, however, that intellectual honesty and facts aren't being ignored or undervalued, it's that admitting the truth requires most people to look at their own lifestyles and realize they've been living a lie for years, decades even, and in order to correct …
/r/MensRights09/06/23 03:13 PM
3

They don't work because you work, they work to support the home. They don't put in any effort? Then that's not a traditional woman. It's not leeching if they support the home. It's trade-off. You sound jaded, young man. Given your username, I understand your plight. Look elsewhere, but don't write off traditional women just because others around you sullied the definition. And try Westernized women if you'd like, but at your own peril.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:45 PM
2

I don't date. I'm old and married, happily. That said, hard pass, even if I could.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:37 PM
9

What you need to look for nowadays isn't whether or not the culture has been westernized outright, but whether the woman comes from a traditional family and the culture is a primarily traditional culture. If she comes from a primarily traditional culture, the dad is present and leads the family, there's no body count or spotty past, and it's clear they put family above all else, then you've lucked out. There really is a short list that works the vast majority of the time, such as: father still l…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 04:29 PM
6

"Remember that your entitlement and complete lack of moral law is why even the sperm banks can't help you clowns now."
/r/MensRights07/06/23 03:32 PM
28

Don't date Westernized women. Korean women are very much Westernized. Bro.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 02:57 PM
14

I live in four different countries with my wife who is traditional Chinese. We do enjoy Singapore the most, truth be told. Realistic. Yes. I am very much being just that. I'm telling my own men the goddamn truth. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:34 PM
38

No. Do enough to get out. You are not wanted here, they made that clear. So they keep you for tax purposes, and women lie in wait to ruin you. Do not be fooled otherwise. So live Spartan, and fucking leave. It is only going to get worse for you if you stay. Please, please, leave this graveyard, and never look back.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:02 PM
12

Suicide is not up for discussion. People who are about to kill themselves need serious help, and immediate help. Please push gender aside on this one - at the gates of hell, there is no gender. Suicide is no joke. I disagree with making the actual act a gendered issue. All 99 yards before this point, sure. But the final yard, no. No.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:12 AM
5

You need to care about what it means for you to be your own man. Getting you to not care about anything is just another objective in their laundry list of objectives. Take your disdain, and go figure out what you believe you think a man is so that you can become your own man. Fuck everything else. And most certainly and assuredly, fuck these clowns here. This isn't reality, it's a launchpad. Apathy today, anger tonight, aspiration and acclimation tomorrow, young man. Give them hell.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 09:53 PM
13

If no-fault divorce persists, you take what you make, no exceptions. No more robbing the other person's piggy-bank unless there's fault. If there's fault, there needs to be set penalties. Adultery, for example - just set it at a certain percentage and amount, no genders, and call it a day. Paternity tests every time, all the time, no exceptions. If we don't start with the facts, where we go is nowhere but clown land. If abortion remains legal, then financial abortion needs to become legal. After…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 12:26 AM
35

I've been here almost 12 years, been watching the clown show the entire time. This comment right here hits the nail on the head. If you require proof, watch anything related to these topics, and pay close attention as to how they consistently and conveniently fail to discuss the actual underlying issues: crap laws, lopsided family courts, and dangling the incentive of government assistance while robbing the man in the room of everything - including the room itself (which he built). They'll talk …
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:13 PM
1

You're not too far off. Try some of the smaller cities in the Southeast, there's still tradition there that aligns somewhat evenly with Eastern cultures. But in America, there's no more runway. Even if you do meet someone, you absolutely should not marry or have children. It's just not worth it, it isn't, full stop. If you're from China, I'd wait it out for another few years. While the pendulum has swung too far left, the pendulum doth swing regardless. And Shanghai being very similar to the sta…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:33 PM
1

There's a lot of truth to this, you're right. It's one of the reasons I failed miserably in three cities before deciding on Nanjing. It's insane how women in Shanghai are wildly different from Wuxi and Nanjing. At the same time, as an American, I see the same insanity here. I can drive from Atlanta to Auburn, and within two hours the entire socioeconomic landscape changes. I don't even have to leave a single US state to see the difference. So yes, if anyone is reading these comments, Mobile_Lump…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 07:32 PM
18

In college. Same experience. In industry. Same experience. Back to being a college professor. Same experience. Well out of the rat race. same experience. Stopped talking to these stupid people. Finally, different experience.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:05 AM
2

Wonderful. I certainly don't want to interact with people who use "toxic" to vilify men speaking their voice, and people who use quotations incorrectly, let that be an "inspiration" to you I guess. Now go away, with your desire to not interact with me. Go, shoo.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 10:43 PM
2

MGTOW is very much moving forward and digging deeper into our culture as we speak, just wait it out. We aren't all just walking away and doing nothing, some of us are walking away AND moving and shaking. Sometime around 2010, I picked up on this trend and branched out. I cut out social media, I didn't bite the online dating bullshit, I started my own business, and I paid close attention to politics, economics, and world trends. Now I hire whoever the hell I want, so while Karen and Nancy are fro…
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:30 PM
25

Whatever makes you feel better, buddy.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 03:33 PM
17

This was around the age I got up, washed myself off, stopped allowing myself to get depressed about reality, beat my debt with a money stick, packed my bags, and fucking left. Married in China to a wonderful woman my age - that's right, ladies, two grown adults met in the middle, compromised, and found stable love and long-term happiness, fucking imagine that! Now we're sitting on three properties in three countries, we use the US location for farming, visiting family, and a launch pad for road …
/r/MensRights22/05/23 03:05 PM
1

This is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 09:39 PM
3

Slow your roll. Men are acting out of fear these days, and doctors will fuck up your vasectomy on purpose out of spite (hooray more females in the medical field?) You could wind up in the Philippines and want a family, but be screwed. Don't let this place fuck you up, and get out, intact, while you can.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:37 PM
8

Yes, the longer you stay on these dating sites, the more brain cells you will lose. I have a homework assignment for you: Count the number of conversations you've had, in the last 30 days, across all dating apps/sites For the next 30 days, attempt to reasonably approach and initiate a conversation with the same number of women, of the same caliber (attractiveness on the app, attractiveness in real life, 1:1), in real life. Compare notes. Now, I've got $20 that says you're going to have a shit ti…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:04 PM
14

I've personally just reset my entertainment clock by 30-40 years and started over, beginning with late 70s movies, shows, and early 80s anime. I'll just pretend it's (<current-year>-40) until actual entertainment is produced again. Video games are still legit, at least. Although, not sure for how much longer. Edit: updated the numbers, because fuck I'm old.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:42 PM
10

The beatings will continue until morale improves?
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:40 PM
16

That's not true, we do have words for this: Unicorns, because if you're in a western culture they don't exist here. Foreigners from non-western cultures, because if you're in a western culture you can clearly see traditional women on the other side of the fence. So unicorns and foreign women from cultures that are still arguably traditional and explicitly focus on actual moral law and family unit/values.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:38 PM
3

This culture war has divided the sexes and I don't see any way back. There isn't a way back, not now. Most especially if you're a white male. We are being pushed out, shouted out, of every space imaginable. You can't even simply keep your head down, grin, and bear it. I'm sorry, but if you're a white guy in the US, the escape plan is strict, straight-forward, and easy to follow: Acquire, or fully utilize, a skill that allows for remote work Remove all debt, and minimize all interactions with soc…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:27 PM
3

Get the hell out of here while you can. There's nothing but traps here for men like you. One accident, hospital bills drive you back into debt. A single one-night stand gone bad, you're in jail. You get a girlfriend, boom, she wants half your assets after a couple of years of cuddling. You get you some, and good on you, boom, another kid. Find a small apartment in another country, save up to buy a condo in another country - I'm being dead serious. If you don't make it a plan A, you need to focus…
/r/MensRights18/05/23 02:10 PM
1

I'm just reciting law from a book dude. Can you give one concrete example?
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:11 PM
1

Initiate, yes. Initiate it wherever, but the originating state is ultimately responsible for both the legal marriage and divorce. I think we're talking about the wrong point though. The right point, in my opinion, is don't get married. Just don't f'in do it. That solves all the problems right there.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:17 PM
1

In the states, the divorce must be filed in the state from which it originated. You could phone it in, but it must be addressed by the state responsible for creating it. This is why the federal government doesn't marry you, the state is the entity that recognizes the marriage. In other words, if you marry in Texas and your wife bails, she could file for divorce in a different state and force you to fly out to the court in which she filed, but Texas is ultimately responsible for that marriage. Te…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:48 PM
1

As an actual medical scientist: COVID fucked all my data. As an actual psychologist: COVID fucked all my data. Yes, shit is out of sorts. Even the experts are still sorting this shit out. I'm being dead honest.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:32 PM
8

If you're a father going through hell, taking care of your children, right this very minute... Please, don't stop. When we grow up, absolute units, giants, indestructible mother fucking beasts... It will be because of you. I speak personally and directly on this point, even with parents who divorced. My father fucking taught me, and didn't quit his bullshit. And I will be forever grateful. So will his grandchildren.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:10 PM
4

contact a divorce law specalized lawyer from your dad's local jurisdiction. Internet neither can nor should be giving meaningful advise on this. All, copy and paste and repeat until we've beaten this into OP's head thoroughly and accordingly.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:04 PM
31

Guy with PhD in computational theory and cognitive psychology chiming in. Answer: do not consider them even close to a parallel.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:08 PM
1

No, it's definitely a good place to post it, because other men need to know current affairs re: anecdotal evidence at the very least. And I 100% agree, South Korea is off the map. I don't have any personal experience with Japanese women, but again, that is why I implore you to objectively speak your mind about your own personal experience here. ETA For example, it was an absolute nightmare dating women in Shanghai, but I found my wife in Nanjing. This kind of thing is important for other men to …
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:24 PM
2

They never did. You can go back 10 years in my comment history, when I was teaching at the university, and I posted the actual stats for several years of both rape accusations and proved rapes at The University of Georgia. It was seriously laughable. We're talking 3 rapes a year out of 45,000 people attending. It wasn't taken seriously then, it won't be taken seriously now, because... They don't want facts, they want attention, more rights, more power, more control. It was never virtue. It was o…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:27 PM
1

It would be worthwhile to specify which type of Asians you're talking about, because it's worth knowing for those blokes out there.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:11 PM
1

Note that the comment above was made by a woman with a 13 day old account. Now, we do not advocate violence here, nor do we promote or support attacking women - physically or verbally. At most, we support defending yourself if and when being attacked. By anyone. People will complain. That doesn't give you the right to yell at them and insult them. Be better than that. Walk away. If attacked, defend yourself. If in doubt, we're here for you.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 05:13 PM
2

You have to give up your fucking khakis. Until you do that, you're not pantsless.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:30 PM
4

You are the all singing, all dancing response of the reddit. Understand that one day you will die. Until then, comment.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 10:06 PM
8

Be strong, don't try to look strong. Self-improvement is masturbation. Now self-destruction...
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:40 PM
0

Leave me alone, and cast your first stone at someone else.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:55 PM
2

Ah, so you think we are sinful, otherwise why would you seek for us to repent. I've got your number now, troll.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:03 PM
5

You tell me when they show up, and I'll get right with them. Until then, the absentee landlord's property will burn.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:50 PM
21

Clowns gonna clown.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:03 PM
5

Oh, it'll be updated. And with every update, it becomes worse. Been watching this steady, systematic shitshow of a decline all my life. The only answer is to home school or move to a country that actually provides education instead of 15 years of indoctrination and 4-6 years of financial rape via college to ensure you're a depleted, broken, forever-in-debt slave to the system and its dictators.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:23 PM
-4

Spend 5 years working on yourself, saving money, learning skills/trades, learning investment strategies, learning a foreign language. Then leave. Spend the rest of your life continuing this process, but also dating women and enjoying life, just not here. The calculus is simple. It's merely the subset of women and geographic locations that are grossly affected - so identify that subset and change the location. Simple as that. You don't have to do this forever. You just have to do it for the momen…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:45 AM
3

I strongly support and recommend all of Clarey's videos and books. All of them. They should be required reading and watching for all men between 18-45 today, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:40 AM
18

Mine pointed the knife and thought I was the fat fucking cunt coworker. While also fucking the coworker. Again, I'm the coworker. Ahem. Yeah. Cheers.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:40 PM
60

Yes. And give it to your lawyer. Along with an exhaustive will, because busses can kill your ass too.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:42 PM
13

Last I checked, women weren't doing anything other than grifting and pretending to work. But I like the pretty picture you've drawn of a wife doing home-related chores, and being understandably upset. It's a pleasant fiction.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:24 PM
-2

Four month old account.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:29 PM
12

Ugh. Asks the two month old account, clearly a woman, canvasing for shit to use against you. Guys, this isn't askreddit, don't bite.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:13 PM
1

In my experience, it isn't shaming directly by other men, it has been "emotion injection and replacement" instead. What I mean by that, is when your own experience and emotion set is completely sidestepped and their emotions and experiences replace your own. For example: going through a divorce, and everyone around you tells you how distraught it makes them, while completely stepping over the fact that it's happening directly to you, indirectly to them. At this age, it's more fascinating than bo…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:34 PM
2

Fuck. I spent a few minutes googling this shit. You're right. Like Australia, I am a bit rusty on current affairs. The fucking Kiwis too. Goddamnit. These dames are relentless.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:42 PM
46

Yeah, this tracks. I remember locking myself in my own room while my ex-wife proceeded to destroy a whole bunch of shit in the house and take a knife to the door trying to get in the room after me. I called the cops after I managed to get her outside and lock the door, where she then proceeded to throw a fucking cinder block through the door window (I was holding it closed until the cops arrived, as she had keys, obviously). When the cops showed up, they saw the knife on the ground next to the b…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:19 PM
1

wut
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:05 PM
2

Less infested. So to an extent, I agree. Still, I was asked my opinion, and I gave it. Doesn't make it right, just makes it a response.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 06:36 AM
1

You're entitled. That much is certain.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 06:35 AM
6

No problem. If you're actually looking abroad, let me give you some advice that may help. Pick a country you think would be a good fit. Travel to that country and stay there for one rental month. That is, rent a place for a month, don't stay in hotels or hostels or couchsurf. This will force you through the system and hold your face against it accordingly. If you're going to live somewhere, you need to know what you like and don't like about it - not just the people, but the economy, the local g…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:11 AM
1

Literally, because everyone is allowed the freedom of thought, and the freedom to make their own decisions and make up their own mind. If he decides he doesn't want to be with you, that's his decision. It's your decision as to whether or not to change your own mind. Or you can try to control what he thinks. It may work. It may backfire in your face. If it backfires, don't say you weren't warned.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:05 AM
13

It depends on your level of effort. I genuinely believe it boils down to that. Specifically, how much effort are you willing to exert to integrate in another country/society. Least effort: Hungary, Romania, Austria, Germany, Netherlands. Mid effort: Greece, Turkey, Denmark, Norway, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand. Most effort (and most worthwhile): China, Taiwan. Tricky effort (depends on whether you're accepted by their people and culture): Japan, Philippines, New Zealand, UAE (UAE is brilliant i…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:54 AM
1

"[...] made me a little scared that my bf will think [...]" If you don't change your mindset, he'll be an ex-boyfriend soon enough. And good for him.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:20 AM
36

Account three hours old. Don't bite, all. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:00 AM
18

Man, I feel your pain. I lived there for a year back in 2011. When I went back in 2018, it felt completely different. It blew my mind what a single decade could do to an entire culture. I thought it was just the US. It. is. not. just. the. US. I'll buy the first round for us if you make your way to Singapore or mainland China, sir. Hope the empathy helps you maintain a bit of that optimism.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:47 AM
28

I fucking love Queensland too. I came close to crying the day I realized Australia had been poisoned too. I wish we could make Carnarvon Gorge a male-only space. Ha!
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:30 AM
2

Whenever a woman has laid hands on me, I cut her out of my life permanently and immediately. I've regretted this precisely zero times.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:28 AM
117

They were given power and authority, and they're not giving it back. Any culture that does this, is on a one-way street. US, Canada, UK, France, Italy, Korea, Australia - they're all in a death spiral. Get out while you can. ETA India as well, definitely India as well. Sorry blokes, thanks for DMing me and reminding me.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:26 AM
3

The time I spend in the US, I've grown to ignore most people altogether. This includes 95% of women. As in, I don't even speak to them. At all. Unless they're family. The time I spend outside of the US, none of these issues occur. None of them. I interact with people as people, I play with children on the playground, I work, I shop, I eat - none of the daily conflicts I experience in the US occur outside of the US (note: I don't travel to other westernized countries, because they're really not w…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:22 AM
8

Here. Borrow my violin. World's smallest.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:46 AM
4

I've spoken to my sisters and female friends about this many times before. From what I can gather, the underlying thought process is akin to maintaining a homogeneous front, like a sort of camouflage, where they're all perceived as 6s - or whatever the average of the group turns out to be. When the 8 steps out, it exposes all the 3s and 4s. Feminism has a way of somehow pushing this game into the text-based world where their front-end must also include what they think and say. Makes sense I gues…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:26 PM
1

If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, understand and accept that reddit is emulating reality, and it's destined to fail for the very same reasons western society is failing right now. When the authorities are biased and corrupt, and women can vote and anonymously suppress/control speech and action, and the barbarians are invading at an increasing frequency and force... Well, you have the Roman Empire reddit. Sort of ruins everything once you know it, but I'd personally rather be in the …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:33 PM
17

Tall men don't assault women simply by being tall. Your premise, and 15 day old account, and inflated number of upvotes, is very telling.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:38 AM
11

I'm a stickler for evidence, and gladly catch hell for it on a regular basis. Still, I'd genuinely like to see some data before forming conclusions. I may begin collecting this data myself. It's not so complex that it can't be stitched together using open records, after all.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 05:22 PM
2

Aye. Good advice. I'm coming in behind you by about a decade, speaking from a late 40s perspective. One saying I've always leaned on that helps me out: "learning costs"
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:59 PM
64

And we're all still waiting on some stats re: the percentage of those women who took the property from men in divorce or purchased property using money they took from men in divorce. Because that's the actual damn talking point we'd love to raise.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:54 PM
5

The fact that I am not berated or insulted by those around me, is a compliment to me. Take from that what you will.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:46 PM
13

I'm sure it feels damn near impossible. Just like being beaten up, the vast majority of us have been there. All I can do is stare down at you, while you're at the bottom of that hole, and tell you, yes, you can crawl out, because yes, some of us did. And I can tell you honestly and sincerely, I hope one day you find a way to do so. On that day, no one needs to notice, no one needs to care, no one needs to be proud of you - except for you. Just like your life, that success will belong to you, too…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:19 PM
9

We all get beaten up - one way or another. I hope you take your trauma and understand the cruelty for what it is, simply, and are able to move on with your life. It's still your life, unless you forfeit or it is stolen from you. Defend yourself against these two scenarios first, and evolve from there.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:10 PM
39

I'll throw out some obvious ones, as it'd be impossible to type out an exhaustive list - I doubt I'd be able to write such a list to begin with, it'd require the entire male collective for such a thing, but...a few obvious ones for you: Asserting their opinion, unwarranted and unsolicited, on a topic they themselves brought up, and then coercing you into having their opinion if you voice yours and it isn't identical to theirs. This isn't just a jerk of a guy, it's a guy who has been conditioned …
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:09 PM
1

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. If it's legal, and as a matter of style and tact doesn't harm or hinder any other individual, you can do whatever the hell you want. Focus on the good stuff. Do what brings you peace. This isn't always happiness, sometimes it's just mild satisfaction and quietude. All of it - up to you. But, well, that's just, like, my opinion, man.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:46 PM
-3

Dear FBI, Those crazies you were talking about? Found one for you.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:15 PM
1

It's important to understand (speaking as an American, relative to helping other American men), that damn near every American man is not only conditioned to never show emotions and never ask for help, they're also conditioned to not accept help lest they appear weak. So this is what it looks like when a man helps another man: Got that? Yeah I got it. Nah. Here, alright, lift. One two three lift. Got it. Got it. Take it easy You too. That's men caring about men. No please. No thanks. It's all imp…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:08 PM
57

From a male perspective, we can just observe a man raised by a non-feminist woman, and a man raised by a feminist woman, and when you put them side by side you know precisely which one you'll have that beer with. It's like night and day. You can always tell within the first minute of talking with them. It's that obvious.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:58 PM
22

A recent study (actual study), whereas the link above is to a law firm's website using outdated/skewed info. According to the more recent study, there's nothing to see here - neither for men or women. It states that, if anything, given a 10 year longitudinal study and view, divorce actually decreases in likelihood. Now, is the woman in the article crap? Yes. Are women going to tip the scales moving forward? I'd bet on it. But is there data for this yet? Doesn't appear so.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:37 PM
1

I'm being silenced by the mods more and more these days, too. After thinking it over, I believe they're trying to prevent all out gender warfare in this sub, which is precisely what the feminist trolls are pushing for, and precisely the type of thing that gets the sub itself removed. It's just a guess, but it does make sense, to me at least, that the mods are trying to have us focus on the core issues, not conflate them with calling women out directly, as again it leads to unnecessary warfare. T…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:03 PM
2

Account five days old. You see. They just bury us, just like this.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:50 AM
3

11 years strong. I'll wager my "main" account and my fake internet points any day. checks Wait, yeah, I understand. That's why.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:42 AM
4

You have been suspended. Case and point.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:41 AM
2

No problem. If you read the mods posts on these matters, they'll give you straight facts on SOP - we're not to brigade, we're not to incite violence, we're not to stoke the flames. State fact, state objective opinion, no witch hunts, no bullshit. It's actually pretty straightforward and simple, really. Pleasure to meet you, too.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:14 AM
2

Yes, this has been happening at an increasing frequency over the last three months. Mods can't be here 24/7, and some of us call shit out when we see it, but many posts are buried into oblivion by these new accounts that hit and run, and it's ridiculous. And don't think we're safe just yet. The "toxic masculinity" post that was made yesterday appeared for 15 minutes, and even though it has strong upvotes (600+), it still isn't showing up on the front page. Not even on Men's Rights. I stand with …
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:09 AM
7

You're going to be downvoted to hell, which is just the tide rolling in, but you make a fair point. The point of me calling out the puppet account is separate - the insta-create-downvote-delete accounts drag down relevant posts, such that this civil discussion, between us, isn't even seen in the end. So, ignore your downvotes, you're being grouped in with the feminist-auto-magical-vanish account unfortunately. But I hear you, and agree.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:02 AM
20

ACCOUNT AND POST BOTH MADE ONE HOUR AGO step up your game, this is embarrassing. And by embarrassing, I mean, slay queen, slay.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 12:35 AM
15

Thanks for your -40 post karma and two months of service. You will be missed. kbye.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:58 PM
0

He was a murder victim. Troll.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 08:21 PM
1

He was a murder victim. Troll.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 08:21 PM
1

For years I would recommend learning their tactics and studying their tricks so you would know when you were being provoked, gaslit, etc. and be prepared to handle the situation rationally, calmly, and legally. These days, my only recommendation is to avoid Western women. If you happen to meet one and get to know them accidentally, then after several months come to know them and can confirm through your trusted inner-circle's objective and unanimous opinions on them, you then ask them on a date.…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:03 PM
2

You insult me, then you insult foreign countries, then you admit you're knee deep in a portopotty. Cool. Still laughing at you while you're in a portopotty. Give it up, troll. You're getting nothing from me. Nothing.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:22 AM
0

I laugh at you. I am laughing at you. Laughing. At you.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:47 AM
1

All good, was worth asking. If he was promoting here, he'd have an easier time just doing it directly, which is why I asked. That's all.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:00 PM
1

This was posted 20 hours ago, it's literally not more than five posts below you right now. Is this artist trying to promote here or something?
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:50 PM
3

"Are you going to fight for your country and redeem your promise to women." Oh, I know this one, I know this one, pick me! Pick me! Ahem No.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:23 PM
63

I started dating in the 90s. I remember coming from a world where you married your high school sweetheart after going to college together. Hell, I even almost did. We dated for 6 years. She, and every other woman I dated in America, lied and cheated and showed no guilt once caught. This absolutely increased in both severity and frequency over the next 25 years, to the point that I gave up and began looking overseas. I live here as well as in China now, and my wife is Chinese with no interest in …
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:40 PM
11

I've been doing this for 15 years, alright. You're not fooling me, or anyone else. Wikipedia is open to edit, this is a fact. You want me wasting my time finding nonsense that has been overly editorialized? Please. Go find your own evidence. Again, edit-wars on wikipedia is a known fact. Stop bothering me.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 11:44 PM
4

We don't need music videos. We need women to police their own. We aren't going to war, working 50 years, and sacrificing our all for a music video. But thank you for the sentiment.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 10:09 PM
21

When America is invaded, and no one's there to fight such a war. cheers.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 10:06 PM
7

Correct. We can't edit, for a wide variety of reasons. God forbid they find out who you are, then thousands will attack your actual person in real life. Wikipedia is a gold standard for everything non-political, in the current day and age. Anything even remotely political? edited. edited. edited. removed. edited. sources needed. edited. edited. removed edited. ...
/r/MensRights18/04/23 10:05 PM
14

Finally you arrive. Yes, that is what they were saying. Even on this subreddit, it takes three exchanges deep just to get to the center of the tootsie pop. Shouldn't have kept the owl out of a job based on gender, I'd say.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 10:02 PM
9

No, it doesn't reduce risk of transmitting STDs, ever since soap and the ability to wash your junk daily. This has been known for a long time.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 08:23 PM
2

I'm glad I went into business for myself way back when. I stand by my decisions to 1) never have a boss, at most only have partners, and 2) keep staff under 10 people, no matter what. Here, let me show you 20 years of stats on who I hired and what I paid them for which work they were doing specifically and respectively: reaches in pocket, pulls out middle finger. Now f off my lawn hippies.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 08:20 PM
25

Break it up, break it up, you two. jj is just fed up with all the trolls and post-and-runs with no descriptions. furchfur, don't be discouraged, they're just asking you to jot down a description because everyone's tired of clickbait here (and in general, really). Make it a win/win and buy each other a beer. Because that shit's manly.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:13 AM
2

Met a woman in China. Learned Mandarin. Married. Lovely family. Acceptance on both sides. Normal, boring, and fucking wonderful, this life. And look, gents, I'm an older guy in the deep south. If I can figure this shit out, so can you. ETA married in China. We both agree marriage in the US is fucking stupid, tax purposes included.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 11:03 PM
-1

No. You will not turn a blind eye to inciting potential brigades. You posted, so own up. This wishy-washy on the fence bullshit is unacceptable, OP. If you posted to create a brigade, then shame on you.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 10:33 PM
1

Yeah, I care. I care a lot. The mods told us explicitly not to do this, and as gentlemen we are only as good as our words. I'm sorry, but attacking them is not an option, because we need to bolster these men's defenses first. First and foremost. Top priority.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 10:31 PM
6

Honestly, just call people out for being dicks. I don't care who it is, if they're promoting hate, or violence, or blatant abuse or manipulation, call it out, call them out publicly and accordingly. Note how we're observing the existence of this vile subreddit, openly discussing it, but none of us here are promoting hate or suggesting violence or even brigading the other subreddit. It's called civility. Have an opinion, but keep all the other nonsense out of it. I hope we continue practicing thi…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:58 PM
9

They must have caught on due to our chatter. Still have the stats, though. Still have the stats. https://subredditstats.com/r/Diabla ETA also, since we're not dumb, we know all that's required is to make another account, go cast echos in feminists chambers for a month, then walk right through the front door of these backdoor communities. But, uh, sh, because that's a secret tactic only women know? Biggest meh ever, on world's smallest violin. Thanks for admitting you're toxic to the mods, though…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:58 PM
21

Don't settle for anyone who doesn't see you as a fellow human being. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:41 PM
17

Meanwhile, men are ignoring these women more and more, learning how to protect their assets better, and discarding the concept of marriage altogether. They're also less likely to have children, because children can be weaponized against them just like marriage, but children is lower on the list of concerns because they don't want to be "stuck" with responsibilities. Still, a top concern nonetheless. That being said, it's no wonder more women are raping young men as the days go by. Men went their…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:40 PM
104

Within fifteen minutes, I was able to help two of my guys better understand their current f'ed up situation with their girlfriends simply by texting them a link directly to some of those posts. That subreddit is vile, yes, but it's also filled with evidence that many men don't get because these women lie through their teeth and protect their own at all costs. So, I'm grateful they're idiotic enough to talk about it right out in the open. Two male souls already saved, simply because these women c…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:49 PM
1

Seconded on therapy. No, i'm not available.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:13 PM
8

They set the talking points beforehand that focus entirely on furthering feminist nonsense. Men are finished, yes. Those of us who could leave, did. Should we help them? Yes, please. But this is 2-3 generations in, it's going to take 2-3 generations to get out. That's assuming we start now. And we're not starting now. Feminists are pushing the far-left-swung pendulum straight through the side of the grandfather clock. If we did start helping men now, we'd stop fucking them sideways sixteen ways …
/r/MensRights16/04/23 08:48 PM
9

I too said that out loud when I read it. "F'in tryst?!?! What is this Romeo Jr. and Juliet Cougar? The actual fuck..."
/r/MensRights16/04/23 03:22 AM
6

Black labs - brother and sister. Runt and bull, female and male. Nobody wanted them, they were sent to slaughter. And I was like, nope, fuck that, coming with me. 11 years now. One of the best decisions I've ever made in my life. ETA my boy once shot a fountain of liquid shit all over the living room, and I picked him up and carried the shit-geyser outside only making it worse. Down in history, one of my fondest memories, so I understand yours waiting to desecrate even more shit.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:32 AM
6

Much obliged. I am well, I appreciate the concern and brotherly love. I'll spend the night out next to the spit, with the dogs, and enjoy the peace and calm of it all. Not angry. And I'm alright. Your nudge to enjoy makes enjoying all the better. And I'll never become cruel like the world, no matter how cruel it becomes to me. This is my right.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:25 AM
2

Hey what's up talk I'm interested. And listening.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 12:06 AM
1

You've never been even remotely near an abused dog, have you?
/r/MensRights15/04/23 12:06 AM
12

"economically attractive men" "unmarried women" Fuck that noise. Take your additional adjectives and shove them directly up your ass, world. ... Sorry. Had another vet I was treating kill himself today. Not in the mood. ...I'm going to make this my last comment for the night....
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:40 PM
10

Please don't kill yourself. Please. I can't tell you it's right or wrong, I know fuck all about you or your life, I just hope you hang on for brighter days. If death is your brighter day, I'll not doubt any man their right to Hunter S. Thompson shuffle off their own mortal coil. I hate writing this comment, and I hate having to write this comment knowing goddamn well why we're even commenting in such a way to begin with.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 05:03 AM
3

Can we set up an OnlyFans for dudes, where we just hang out and trade Doge or something. I mean fuck it, why not.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 05:09 PM
2

While eating your cake. Happy Cake Day!
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:44 PM
2

Just above Judas, you have the treacherous. So, no, not extreme. Par for the course.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:33 AM
33

40% of single women have another man's child they want you to take care of. I am glad they are at least more moral than us disgusting men? /s
/r/MensRights12/04/23 09:25 PM
2

hahaha, goddamnit, made me spit my coffee you absolute madlad.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:29 PM
3

It's all good, I was just very confused. Good evenin' to you, sir!
/r/MensRights11/04/23 10:56 PM
30

So now, because you don't want to stick your dick in crazy, you are chemically imbalanced. Whatever. Hard pass.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:43 PM
2

I'm confused. You replied to me, but are you talking about the video? Am I insulting you, or is the video? Anywho, hope you are well, and that you enjoy your evening.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:42 PM
12

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Walk the fuck away. You can't win. You can only not lose.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 08:16 PM
2

Alright so I went left, then right...then right again... guys...guys?? guys!?!?! Fucking yuuuge.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:44 AM
13

This is why you put your foot down, pivot, and walk away. When they shame, walk away. Like a gentleman, walk away. And never look back.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:25 PM
3

In the South (southeastern US, aka deep south), I still hold the door open for, well, anyone right behind me. It's definitely cultural to a large extent, this one (holding doors open). Geographically speaking at least.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:39 PM
2

As an older man, the fact that women, women with children, older women, younger women, etc., distance themselves from me now just as much as I distance myself from them is, well... chef's kiss
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:37 PM
2

Agreed. I've investigated these types of people (men and women alike), as the patterns are the same since the paperwork is the same. It'll be a three year long ride up until you send USCIS your third year of joint tax returns, then you'll be entrapped and arrested. This has been going on for a long, long time. No green card, foot down. If she's no longer interested, there's your answer. Simple as that. And if you think I'm full of shit, then please see the I-400 form and realize they can sponsor…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 07:09 PM
12

MGTOW. We know how fucked up it is. More and more of us, every day, are deciding not to play.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 09:17 PM
-19

It's a bit of a logical leap to go from indoctrination to genocide and dystopian totalitarianism, but then again your account's a month old, and there have been a lot of feminist brigades invading this sub recently, attempting to rile us up and paint us as crazy... So, well, nice try I suppose.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:46 PM
34

Here's how: Current generation of men going their own way, and not playing the game, leaving the feminists without slaves. Therefore, they must teach the next generation of men to shut up and be slaves. It is okay, because they should feel honored to serve women. It's not an accident that men are restricted from mentoring, teaching, raising children - it's deliberate and intentional. Sadly, it's also working. Thankfully, only for now. Feminists think the backlash from the current generation of m…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 02:24 PM
8

I noticed the same thing, and it's what lead me to look abroad. All my life, lithe white guy, then suddenly only obese women are interested. This is your sign to check out. Believe me or not, but I hope you believe me.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 03:58 AM
2

Do not mistake kindness as weakness, or civility as cowardice. I'm from the south, and we try our best to be polite, but that sure as hell doesn't mean we're not built to fight, sir.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 09:21 PM
3

Just trying to keep the advice grounded and realistic is all. Remember, a lot of men here are actually taking notes, so we owe it to them to think these things through in order to keep everyone safe. Monero can't easily be traced, but XMR can't be used as easily as BTC. If you're going to use BTC via debit (such as with a Coinbase debit card), there will still be transactions that can be traced and linked to you, but in these scenarios you're not trying to avoid the FBI or hide your money from t…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:07 PM
6

This seems like overkill, but it's closer to the truth than most men are comfortable admitting. It may seem unachievable at first blush, but you can absolutely create and build a separate checking or savings account, and a crypto portfolio, with about 10-20k in them if you are frugal, careful, and disciplined. When I had to exit a toxic marriage with an abusive criminal, this was precisely how I was able to do so. When they drain the joint accounts and make home life absolutely miserable such th…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:07 PM
-6

So you admit I'm right, finally, but you and your sockpuppets and cronies downvote me anyways. Thank god you're stuck here in fake world.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:58 AM
-10

There is clearly one male present in the picture. ETA just read through your comments, now I see you're a troll playing the middle game. Go away, troll.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:31 AM
-15

You're polarizing. You don't have to be for or against affirmative action or MAGA to see that a graduating class and entire surgical team are comprised of Captain Planet, minus the white guy.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:22 AM
5

Bingo.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:21 AM
1

Shit. I'm sorry. You were on point, I was doing too many things at once. My apologies, sir.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:59 AM
1

This is absolutely relevant to men's rights, because of the countless downtrodden souls who come here looking for just an inkling of justice and truth in a world that's consumed by this nonsense. We all need to know there's a fighting chance to genuine equality (egalitarianism), and articles such as these help people hang on to hope.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:36 AM
0

The mod team can remove a post within a few hours, but does nothing about the hundreds of trolls invading this subreddit on a regular basis. Guys, seriously. It's not as if the title is misleading, and it's not as if redundant posts of a legitimately serious article are bad for the community. What gives, I mean. Seriously. What gives.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:34 AM
6

Joke's on them, as they're slowly learning: men are as silent as they are wise, it's an acknowledgement we give with the nod of our heads. Some things never change, thankfully. Also, /s means your comment is sarcastic. Pin it to the end of your comments so others know what's up, at a mere glance, before knee-jerk reacting to your comment without reading it through.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:28 AM
5

Hell sounds nice. If you're giving the option and all.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 11:53 PM
20

This part is conveniently buried with dull language and wording, but you're right. I didn't catch it on first read. However, she didn't call after the killing, she called as they were dying. She did, in fact, call the husband to tell him she had just, and is essentially in the process, of murdering their girls. The fuck am I supposed to do with that.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:25 PM
1

OP is a month old account, whose description is a link to get free money (lol). Conversation is between OP and another user that was made 9 hours ago. So, I guess feminists are propping up entire posts as straw men now, eh?
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:50 PM
5

Testicular cancer. Women most affected. /s
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:17 PM
6

You should learn how to use commas, they help immensely. Captured your comments before you delete your account, by the way. Also, no thank you.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 08:25 AM
8

The way they're pretending to be male says quite a lot, too. Think about it for a second...pluck one of their wretched comments here and just imagine you're a feminist who genuinely believes we're here looking and sounding like this: "HEY GUYS WOMENS ARE STO STUPID THEY CAN VOTE I MEAN THEY SHOULD JUST SHUT UP HARDARDAR BUT WHAT ABOUT OUR FEELS I MEAN WE CAN'T NOT HAVE FEELZ HARHAR" It's actually rather insulting, to be honest. On the one hand, they're welcome to their opinions, decisions, lifes…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:39 AM
10

Your account is 10 days old. Also, no, we don't believe in doing such things. The mods were very clear with us on these points. Now go away, troll.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 12:21 AM
8

Take a look around you. The world is filled with injustices, and people are slighted and betrayed by not only other people, but institutions, banks, governments, movements... When people are in pain, they lash out. We are seeing a lot of that these days. I beg of you, do not lose sight of your own empathy and compassion, but take no shit from anyone. It's a tightrope, this, but I assure you it's worth walking.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:45 PM
14

They're just trying to set up straw men that they can later knock down or use as "proof" that this subreddit is hateful. Vigilance and patience. Don't give them an inch. Call them out when you see them, report them when they're violating the rules, and let time do the rest.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:34 PM
31

Knowledge81, account created 15 minutes after OP posted. Don't feed the obvious troll, guys.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:15 PM
0

For the young blokes who feel this way, but can't put words to it or fully explain why and how they feel this way, I'll give you the shortcut and cheat code now: The word "should". When it is spoken, pay close attention. In an elevator with all women, and have the audacity to say something out loud (something simple and nice, like 'good evening ladies, what are the odds?!?') - wait for the woman who says "you should feel honored." <-- don't even make eye contact with this one, just get off the e…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:47 PM
2

Something I noticed recently, is the number of publications written by women that are essentially belittling, guilt-tripping, and shaming men into voting the way women want them to vote. On the front page of politics, there's an entire thread right now dedicated to calling non-voting men unattractive cowards, and conservative leaning mean worthless unattractive cowardly scum. I laugh, because it's cute to me. Coercive control doesn't work on seasoned veterans. What I'm trying to say in response …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:40 PM
5

For those not in an engineering or technical realm, this is actually fairly common. The thing is, when you're so hyper-focused on acquiring a seemingly near-impossible goal, all hands are on deck. No one gives a fuck what gender you are, they only care about solving the problem set. To the OP, you're not a pick me girl, whatever that means this week. You're a goddamn scientist and edge-cutter. And I'm glad you're on top of your shit.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:07 AM
-1

Yes, I am ignoring the person you want to bring attention to, correct. I am not interested in witch hunts.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:23 PM
2

This sub has been heavily invaded as of late, and when accounts seems suspicious or are acting suspiciously I simply call it out. Your account is a year old, with no karma, for example. People come here for a safe space with objective feedback they can trust. They come here to listen and to be heard. We do not come here to tie people to stakes in hopes that other people burn them as we stand idly by and watch.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:11 PM
5

Notice that the user being referenced is not the OP and hasn't even commented here. Don't fall for this bullshit, all.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:58 PM
0

Half the accounts commenting here were made within the last 5 days. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:35 AM
2

Correct.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 10:03 PM
1

No, it's really not, but alright troll, alright.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 11:27 PM
4

Honestly, if you don't have a CPA, either speak with your most familiar lawyer for a referral or find one locally. Just schedule an appointment and let them blow your mind. You're talking about your money, so really, I implore you, go talk to people whose entire education and career revolves around the concept of "your money".
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:40 PM
5

If you instantiate an LLC (or whatever is equivalent if you're not in the US), you can roll a Clink account just like a Stash account. You can also have partners that share in the equity, even if the company does nothing at all, which allows you to create death and disability policies, terms of death (like a will, but for property and money via a business)...I mean, there's a metric fuck ton of stuff you can do with your money that would steer its course based on the operating agreement of the L…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:34 PM
-1

Mods, will you please note the uptick in posts that are attempting to rile men up in order to get us to invade other subs with a frothing mouth? I stopped reading the comments after the top two comments were from accounts made within the last week. This is becoming pathetic.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:29 PM
2

Account 6 days old.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:28 PM
5

Account 8 days old.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:28 PM
1

Working relationships are hard indeed. It may be worth pointing out that she didn't play video games before she met me. Take that for what it's worth, and best of luck to you sir.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:22 PM
2

Excuse me while I go to the shop, handcraft my own shelves and create an entire entertainment center to house multiple consoles attached to a 4-to-1 KVM, all while I wait for my shipment of metrovania games to arrive. I will then proceed to play said games as long as I wish. Likely well into the night. My wife will not be judging me, just so long as she can invade for our date night ritual of multiplayer Secret of Mana we love playing together. Whenever it occurs, that's what makes it a date nig…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 06:04 PM
2

Do you. If it isn't hurting anyone, if it isn't taking anything away from anybody in any way, shape, or form, then fuck it. Just do you. However you fucking please, just do you.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 05:57 PM
9

And if you're paying attention to the conversations here, you'll see a lot of this positive behavior and reinforcement at work, and I'm glad. Married men speak up, speak sense. Single men talk about isolation, loneliness, fear. Young people, old people, all shapes and sizes. But there is a clear divide between this sub and other subs that do promote such nonsense, and feminists like to group us together with them all the time. The bronicorns who are SlAyInG tHaT pUsS or whatever, they ain't us. …
/r/MensRights17/03/23 04:06 PM
3

Troll account. Be advised.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:55 PM
7

Account is five days old. Troll. All, please note, people who do not like this sub have been busy trying to get you to make mistakes so you get banned. That is their objective. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:20 PM
5

Cool, just say as much. I'm sorry you went through that shit. He's going through that shit right now. Just trying to protect us. No harm, no foul. Didn't mean to insult you or drudge up bad memories, and I'm glad your intent is as straightforward as mine sir.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:02 AM
18

Why would you ask him these questions? Back off, the man needs a lawyer, not an interrogator. ETA Stand down, the comment above is meant to help prepare the boy, that's all. Downvote me, upvote him.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 11:20 PM
1450

Lawyer. Stop talking here. Lawyer. Please, go. Lawyer, now.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:06 PM
7

This is precisely why men are cutting out bad actors in their life, and then finding themselves with few, if any, people left behind. They are asking themselves, "am I contributing all the effort?" and in doing so, realize that most of their own family don't actually support them, or even care. Welcome to the great divide. You'll find many men here who understand you, and I hope you find some comfort and solace in that. We all struggle with our emotions and feelings here. But here, you are more …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:01 PM
2

Well, they have sisters. And those sisters begin paying attention to foreign prospects and coming over. I maintain, avoidance of Western women will serve you well. How that avoidance is practiced, is something we're all doing collectively as men, as we speak.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:59 PM
5

I'm not going to lie, for you it becomes an increasingly harder struggle each and every day. It isn't very encouraging, I know, so just work the logistics. I didn't drop a bunch of money to go wife-hunting. I went abroad on business according to my own life plans. I did not expect to return both successful with my career and successfully having met my potential (and now) wife. I managed my expectations, and didn't do it solely to find a woman. It could be studying abroad, it could be for a job. …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:25 PM
4

Yes, it did indeed pay off. I've survived both a bipolar schizo (we were young, so honestly, I don't blame her, it was just early 20s young dumb love and I called it before it even became a thing), and a green card criminal using foreign appeal to game American simps (handed that one over to the FBI, with a great satisfaction). But I didn't quit. I just took my time. I asked myself what I wanted, what I actually wanted, out of life. When I began searching again, it was liking shooting fish in a …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:10 PM
6

A little bit of hope goes a long way, just be careful. My mother is my saving grace. Because of her, I kept searching. For me, personally, it was cutting out Westernized women altogether. I'm not saying it works for everyone, I'm just anecdotal evidence, but having a great mother was the only reason I didn't give up hope in finding a good wife. I just had to travel across the entire fucking world to find her. Harsh times and conditions, these, and therefore harsh measures are in order.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:42 PM
92

I honestly don't see how men are supposed to navigate these waters anymore. They're simply too treacherous, and with the Facebook groups it becomes a weird world where they actually are forming harems. I remember reading that for the first time a few years ago and shrugged it off as some one-off, but the conspiracy theory has become reality. I would ditch social media and dating apps altogether, and just asks friends to keep an ear to the ground. Close family members too. When I dove back in, ar…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:07 PM
2

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:07 PM
0

Under 18, girl. 18+, woman/lady. I've never had anyone correct me, but I'm also a Chad, and results are fucking skewed for us.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:01 PM
2

Indeed. I typically say, "thank you, I was about to waste some of my time, and now I'm not," in my head when I see such garbage. But they don't know they're holding their own sign way up high, so just ... keep quite and we'll see how long they'll keep doing it.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 03:59 PM
12

Men and women support women. Women support women. Math is simple from there.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:54 AM
5

Indeed. Get up in the morning and ask yourself, "what do I want to do with my time today, what do I think is important, what do I want and need," then proceed, good sirs, proceed! Learn how to impress yourself, too. If the world is going to neglect us, so be it, but that doesn't mean we have to neglect ourselves. Be kind to yourself, be proud of your own accomplishments. It's not easy, but we all knew it wasn't going to be easy. It's hard today, it'll be hard tomorrow. But it's worthwhile, becau…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:33 PM
1

Born from the quote itself: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/207517-tough-times-don-t-last-tough-people-do TRIGGER WARNING: WHITE MAN SPEAKS WISDOM THROUGH QUOTE. lol, sorry, couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:11 PM
5

The fact that we're both with realistic points and perspectives brings with it an inevitable sadness, but I am glad to hear that you're winning the war against your own traumas and demons. Tough times never last, but tough people do.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:47 PM
12

Heads up: don't feed the troll. MaximumEyeQ is 11 days old. Every day, more and more trolls are showing up here. I make it a point to check the account's age before giving it a second thought, and certainly don't bother responding unless they've commented here before.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:22 PM
6

And you're collateral damage, which saddens me. You're right, we simply just stop looking at women altogether, those of us who truly walked away from the rigged game. I honestly don't know how women like you who have their head on straight manage to get us to pay attention. It's getting to the point where the small percentage of good women left will need to start wearing t-shirts that say, "you can talk to me, lawyers won't be necessary!" I laugh, but...I mean, what are we all supposed to fuckin…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:18 PM
13

Indeed. Once you go a step further and fully realize that these women won't be doubting themselves or feeling bad for their poor judgement and decision making, you genuinely begin seeing this brave new world for what it really is: completely out of its fucking mind.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:14 PM
30

I'd want it far away from me, yes!
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:12 PM
3

Who said anything about dating? Utilizing.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 08:41 PM
2

Yes, that's exactly what it is. Chads that show up win their own harem. Followed swiftly by losing all their assets, dignity, and self-worth.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 06:52 PM
2

Yeah. Guys, this account is a troll. Before they edit their comments, pay close attention to the capitalization of words throughout all their comments over the 14 days the account itself has been established. It's a troll, and the troll is mocking us. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 02:06 AM
2

Please note, all, TheDadUSA's account is 14 days old. Neither for or against the commentary, just pointing it out is all so you can take it into account and consideration.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 02:02 AM
9

Right now, I would strongly recommend keeping up with current affairs, though. Go your own way, absolutely, but along that way be sure to read the news on a regular basis. If the walls are closing in on you, best to know how many inches per day, is all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 09:03 PM
1

Abroad. Yes. Just not to a broad. Strong no.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 03:06 AM
32

Yeah, I'm a mathematician/scientist, I liked it. Nothing struck me as woke, really. Period piece, with a tolerable level of exaggeration. Written for women, obviously, but a period piece can be enjoyed as just that if you'd like. The flip-side of the coin for Hidden Figures is Apollo 13. You should ask your mom to watch both with you.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:58 AM
2

...go much higher.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:00 AM
2

I'm a mathematician. I add the next unknown prime to the total count.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 05:47 AM
2

Spot on.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 06:22 AM
1

How to identify if a topic hits too close to home for feminists: when half the comments are downvoted, and rightfully so. Example: these comments. IMHO, it also has a lot to do with the fact that porn stars, like many men, remain active and fit, and being attracted to your own body type is the norm. Meanwhile, the fit women aren't complaining, they're Chadding. If they land a Chad, they'll lose their shit if Chad watches porn - due primarily to their insecurities. This is where my observations e…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 12:04 AM
15

Lawyer. Lawyer. Lawyer. Stop talking to us unless it's a throwaway account. You know we're here for you. But fucking lawyer. Now.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 02:20 AM
20

Indeed. My mother has owned and operated a dance studio all my life. I'll be buying it from her as part of her retirement strategy. I've been the only guy on staff pretty much my entire adult life, and my sisters and daughters (colleagues and students) don't see me as a 'guy' for the same reasons I don't see them as 'girls'. We get on the dance floor because we want to dance, and it's us against the floor. I know this is entirely anecdotal and most certainly an exception to the rule, but there a…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 08:43 PM
4

turns off torch, pulls mask up, sets down heavy metal what's that? Couldn't here you over the sound of making Iron Man look like a grade school kid. Do you see us laughing? Well, we are. On the inside. Bro-high-five.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:17 PM
10

Indeed. I remember feeling like a fucking king the day I paid off my mortgage (fast tracked a 30 year in 5 years by paying 5x principal every month) and reaching a million net worth - according to my own plan, lifestyle, actions, and choices. I was 36. It feels fucking amazing to win. The desire to have others be around to see you do it truly does fade with time.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:46 PM
9

Yes, this is also a large part of MGTOW in my opinion and should not be understated. I was MGTOW for a very long time because I wanted to take my time. I did find an excellent woman, when I was ready and when I wanted to, on my time and on my terms. In China, in my late 30s. It isn't often discussed because this is a nuanced aspect of MGTOW, but MGTOW itself is shit on so much because people know that if men take their time and just say "no thanks", we won't waste time or resources on most, if n…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:38 PM
2

My wife is Chinese, very traditional. Turns out, our cultures aren't that much different. I'm deep south traditional (without truck nuts or the fake ass accent that comes with the flannel shirts), and she's mainland China traditional. We grew up on farms and don't care for fancy shit and just enjoy a very simple and boring life. It's nice. Really.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:18 AM
-3

I'm not here to do your homework, Mike. This is the Mensrights subreddit, not Politics. Also, it was a rhetorical question. Use a dictionary to look that up if need be. And kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:51 AM
1

Game, set, match.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:06 AM
-10

Cool. Justice. Love it. He is still not fit for the job or position. Can we finally talk about his credentials now? JFC.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:02 AM
22

Am a Chad, but took the red pill years ago. Can confirm. If you really want to make feminists angry for doing absolutely nothing wrong at all, be a Chad that doesn't talk to American women at all. Sometimes I think they hate me the most, to be honest. Like cattle that refuses to lie down and die to be someone else's dinner.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:57 PM
2

When all that's left is diminishing hope, it sure as hell is harder than anything else. If you off yourself, you won't know about tomorrow. Keep hope close. Just get to tomorrow, then do it again. If you end the game now, no one will ever know for sure. But fuck everybody, you're dead in this scenario. You won't ever know for sure. Stick around. You're not the only one fighting these demons. You're not alone. I am certain.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:42 PM
1

And that's all you can do, sir. Let yourself off your own hook!
/r/MensRights20/02/23 09:25 PM
3

I bet you're above average at a great many things! Objectively speaking, subjective perspective and measuring your worth using a subset of variables selected by other people does not automatically make you below average.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:23 PM
2

This is you being social, here and now. Is it helping? Then let this thread serve as an example of how talking things out with peers and colleagues gets you somewhere further on down your road.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:21 PM
5

Don't give up. You're not alone. Remember, COVID and three years of isolation and zero assistance is a heavy variable in this equation right now, for a lot of us, if not damn near all of us. Also remember, better safe than sorry. Continue investing in yourself, and while I personally don't believe dependency is a bad thing, remember to keep an eye on where you're mentally and emotionally drawing the line between desiring intimacy and starving for intimacy so the desire to be in a relationship is…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:19 PM
1

Damn I love being self-employed. I'd rather liquidate and live in Jamaica than ever enter the work-force here in America.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 12:33 AM
1

No, I was responding. It was even a direct response, it was tangential at best. But whatever.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:16 AM
1

...is your charity belt asking me a question, or...
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:34 PM
1

You know how women either want you to respond or listen (active support vs. passive support), and how it helps immensely to begin conversations with "am I helping, or are we bitching? Cool." The male equivalent of this mechanism is "crying while laughing". In America, we would love assistance, but we very rarely actually receive it. For example, if you are a white male who is sick and in need of a doctor, telling us that we need to go see a doctor is absolutely helpful - except... ...if we can a…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:10 PM
1

Hilarity ensues. I was really hoping they'd double down on "charity belt" just to gaslight us for the lulz.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:00 PM
5

I archive all the posts, threads, comments, in real-time. It's cool. If you don't hear from me again, you will, but under a different handle. Been doing this all my life. Best of luck trying to find my other accounts created over a 13 year span that do not intermingle sub-reddits, dear mods. This is one of many areas that require constant archiving, as they are constantly on the brink of outright deletion. I'll not have it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:43 AM
1

But they're gone, they left. Whatever remains, I hope you do something with it. The damage is done, but the distraction is gone. Literally do anything you want and need to do, the roadblock has conveniently removed herself. Fuck it, do it out of spite. Just to revoke any sense of accomplishment from their minds. From the ashes, rise.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:00 PM
2

Yes, just lay that shit down flat. Brass tacks. Not only will you shake him of his daydreams, you will gain his utmost respect. If he retaliates or is butthurt, do this: "you're upset, I get that, so as a friend I provide time and space. No need to talk any further until you're ready, and I'll let you know when I'm ready, too."
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:53 PM
32

I've lost 90% of my female friends this way, yes. You're not alone. To be honest, you should have a drink splashed in your face every now and again. It's a great way to discover new mixes! Strawberry-margarita-sorry-not-sorry-bye
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:50 AM
2

I had a close friend attempt to scold me when I said mankind in a sentence during a completely unrelated and utterly irrelevant philosophical discussion. I said, "fuck you nancy, quit your bullshit." And she responded, "yeah, my bad, you got me, moving on."
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:37 PM
3

You can really just stop at "weakness". Because even the very words required to explain your trauma have been deemed weak. The words, the context, the scenario, all of it. This is why men need to confide in men right now. Focus on the context. If you're suffering PTSD, seek out a VA clinical psychiatrist (or reference if you're not military). Share your trauma, please. If you seek sympathy, empathy, share it with those who have also been similarly traumatized, or those professionals capable of h…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:19 PM
19

All major financial moves should be made before the marriage. Better than a prenup, in my opinion. Any major financial decisions made on the inside of a marriage, 50/50. Put up or shut up. If it all goes to shit, we'll argue about who gets those stupid time shares, but we'll both win and lose more or less equally.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:12 AM
10

I wonder if anyone's thought to run a study as to how many of these homes were purchased by men and then, by way of divorce, ended up belonging to women.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:10 AM
3

In the same boat, except I just abandoned American women altogether and found my wife in China. Which has sucked for a couple of years, yes. Logistics, awful. But you know what men want? Something stable and reasonable and manageable. Even if it is a split household between opposite sides of the world during a global pandemic. So yes, American women, it's easier to do all of that (had to learn Mandarin, too...), than it is to put up with you. This is why we don't even look at you anymore. You're…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 02:02 AM
1

All they need is a single working example. All any man needs is just one working instance. When it's the mother, this is ideal. But give us one honest-to-god, hard as nails, no bullshit, stand-up woman, insert them into our lives, and we will always have hope. That's all it takes. A relationship with just one good woman, and we're sold for life on there possibly being more.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:45 PM
2

I grew up in a dance studio. I have thousands of sisters. I'm one of four dudes in the dance realm that is straight. I have the inside track in a way that's so incredibly helpful. At the same time, any one of my sisters or girls can ask me anything and I'll tell them the truth point blank. Feminism killed platonic relationships. It's collateral damage that is absolutely overlooked, and really sucks for damn near all of you out there - male and female alike.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 01:27 AM
5

I can't take the credit for whomever wrote, "birds of a feather flock together." I was merely saying that, but with different words. Still, the credit goes to that individual. Psychologically and sociologically speaking, it is most apt.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 01:23 AM
9

I wouldn't downvote this comment, nor gloss over it as nothing. Note how subtle and hidden the truth nugget is: good people attract good people. This lady has lady friends, they're all ladies. The probability is actually quite high. Shit dudes have shitty friends. Hoes got their hoes. And so it goes. But this is a good take away - if you're looking for a lady, find one with friends who are all ladies, too.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:09 PM
2

Author holds a masters in forensic and legal psychology. Not a doctorate in social or developmental psychology. Given the state of academia these days, her background likely comprises cases of men as perpetrators and women as victims. Am an actual doctor of behavioral and cognitive psychology with real world clinical psychology experience, both genders. She isn't an authority, she has some education and a voice because she's female. She isn't qualified to write such articles. Proof? If she was, …
/r/MensRights07/10/22 12:01 AM
2

Indeed. The only fucking reason I have my house is because I was lucky as fuck. I happened to have enough money, a supportive father-in-law who cosigned, and a real-estate agent who owed me a favor BIG TIME. I bought early 2010s, and had no idea that also happened to be the best goddamn time to buy. People really can't look at us when it comes to working models. We're fucking flukes, and everyone is correct, this system is broken. And don't count on luck. That fucker's like cupid. No logic, no n…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:52 PM
3

Well then good. I'm rehabbing myself as well. Taking full advantage of this weather to wrap up exterior carpentry and annual landscaping, limb cutting, usual suspects, yadda yadda, you know. Managing a house is a grown man's secret gym. It's a shame buying property is damn near impossible for kids these days - great investment, indefinite workout, so on and so forth.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:54 PM
2

Rapid weight loss at that age - check that prostate regularly sir. Please.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:44 PM
2

I second the advice then. You really need to focus on yourself right now, otherwise you're unwittingly expecting the other person to bring you happiness. If you luck out and find the woman of your dreams tomorrow, I assure you she doesn't bring a box of your own happiness in through the door with her. I'd disable the online dating accounts for now, focus on yourself, go find yourself again - your passions, your desires, your fun, you. My father always told me, "be the thing you wish to attract."…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:02 PM
1

I'll take the bullet here and be hated by all: Psychologist/therapist (most my work is behavioral/cog, I/O, and helping with the VA when it comes to suicide prevention specifically). You are telling your side of the story, and that's great. She has found a space to tell her side of the story, and that's great too. Married, with child, in home, miscarried, finances...look, there's a lot going on here, and it can't be boiled down to a single perspective, nor explained in a single post. I strongly …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:32 PM
2

Well, for the record, it didn't even cross my mind to think of you as selfish or ungrateful. All I ever want people to do in the end, is think critically and be kind. So, keep on keepin' on. This is a space where we're allowed to speak freely. I don't see you doing anything wrong whatsoever, honestly.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:52 PM
2

And I think that's a huge difference between here and everywhere else. You see, I respect your opinion, understand you, and upvote you because I think that's a valid opinion and I respect it. I don't have to share it to respect it, but I respect it.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:32 PM
0

I'm a huge feminist in real life. As in, funding scholarships for girls and being fully behind Girls Who Code when it comes to teaching level of feminist. I suppose that's why I find the time I spend here so awkward and hilarious. It's a good reminder that men suffer silently all the fucking time, feminists in real life aren't nearly as bad as the ones hiding here behind anonymity, and feminists in real life who are bat shit crazy really are all around you, they're just checked by things such as…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:58 PM
2

Also, gentlemen, don't stick your dick in crazy. No, that doesn't mean it's all our fault for wanting to have sex, I'm just saying, in general, as a good rule of thumb... Stick your dick in a hornet's nest for a slightly less painful experience, please.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:54 PM
9

Move on and let the garbage take care of itself. This should be emphasized and higher up on the shelf of our collective consciousness here. No one said anything about stopping and listening to nonsense, you can just keep walking. Personally, I just hide these people. Hide posts, block users, etc. I know nothing good will come from listening, responding, interacting with them, so, I move right along, zero fucks given.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:51 PM
1

I've been catching a lot of this lately. Being called a racist seems to be a good indicator that the conversation is being steered towards misandry no real land. Note: I'm a white male, that's called cis now or something isn't it? Nevermind, don't care.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:40 PM
3

The video's hilarious and on point. Wasn't expecting that, given the title. Thanks for posting, OP!
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:00 PM
1

She was bipolar. Thanks for the victim-blaming, though. I guess.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:44 PM
9

Your lawyer should tell you point blank that divorce requires one of a handful of levers be pulled. Right out of the gate, the "cruelty" lever is being pulled, so you are well within your rights to file for divorce whenever you'd like. As far as everything else, please leave it to the lawyers, really. Tell them everything, be honest, hide nothing, and simply tell your story in full. The lawyer hears you and uses everything you say and provide to move into discovery, this is your offense - it's j…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:24 PM
14

I'm sorry, sir. You are probably feeling like shit these days, because that's what being verbally and mentally abused does to a person. Please try not to also beat yourself up as well, although sadly I know you're going to anyways - the human condition really blows sometimes. I hate it for you. I have a story for you, and maybe it helps. I hope it helps. My first marriage was a year long sprint of escalating abuse. We were passionately in love (young and dumb). Three months of dating and then ma…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:40 PM
6

It was really disappointing to me, too. I comment in a variety of subs, and when the gender bias beast rears its ugly head, the point and purpose of the topic and discussion get thrown out the window. I may post here rather often, but really I'm just trying to listen, to talk, to respond. I just happened to naturally gravitate here. I've seen many other subs be invaded, too. My best guess is, it has nothing to do with us, but rather the Roe vs. Wade repeal has pushed all women over the edge and …
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:10 AM
3

Honestly, i think that'd be cool, but only because I think it'd be funny to see when our own comments get flagged as being "feminist" or "feminist leaning" - however the bot is scripted. It'd be hilarious if this sub could be objectively proven to be more feminist than the feminist subs themselves, haha!
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:06 AM
16

While I agree with you based on anecdotal evidence, I do so cautiously because I don't want for men to give up hope or fall into the "all women" trap that these women have fallen into when it comes to "all men". I'm happily married, after all, but am just an anecdote. Still, I am, so I try to focus my attention on questioning data, thinking things through, continuing the debate. So on and so forth. Just like in politics, everybody hates a centrist, though...haha!
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:57 PM
34

To me, the fact that we're open to talking about women's issues here is the glaring difference between "us" and "them". We just don't want our issues to be neglected here, that's all. Otherwise, we're all ears.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:44 PM
30

And it's not as if we have it all figured out, thus the point about self-regulation. Sometimes we're echo-chambering bullshit and there's nothing wrong with checking friends and colleagues on the facts.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:37 PM
51

It is often said, because it is most often true.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:33 PM
1

Okay, this one time I responded to a deleted account because I wanted to laugh at how you deleted your account for having absolutely no logical rebuttal to anything I say. I'm glad you only really have a temporary voice here. At least there's that comfort and solace.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:45 AM
3

Account is two days old. Cool story, grrl.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:03 PM
2

We had to let my father go because of this. He just can't see past sacrificing everything just to have a woman in the household. Once he changed the deed and then began scolding his sons if they go against his will was the final straw. We told him to write us out, give his new wife everything, and we don't care. Because we never cared. It sucks that it has come to this.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:50 PM
3

Nail, head.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:48 PM
-1

As a desirable man, I can assure you, nothing changes. The only difference I have seen is that women will perform the most magnificent mental gymnastics to justify their behavior. I'm married, but I'm also a schmuck humanitarian that leaves his door open. I've honestly never seen such hatred and disdain for me than women who refuse to recognize my wife is abroad, I'm not looking to fuck, and I don't want to talk as soon as it's clear you're just trying to corner me into some bullshit scenario to…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:44 PM
9

Here, let me give you a tip, and I genuinely believe it helps. When you feel like you're naive and gullible, accept it and then ask yourself, "so are there people more naive and gullible people than me?" When you feel like you're always being abused and thrown away once you serve your purpose, used up and left for dead, ask yourself, "are others feeling more disposable than me?" When you are so frustrated that no one helps men and all the money and attention and assistance goes to women, look ar…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:36 PM
1

Except you're pointing out a false hypocrisy by using a strawman. Now you're cherry picking comments to serve your goal of, whatever, I've lost interest, there's no debate here, there's only your agenda. I'm done feeding the trolls for the day.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:14 PM
0

You just won't quit until we feel sorry for the woman, will you? We can empathize with both sides while also giving reasonable advice to the man in the form of, "cover your eye before she pokes it out."
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:55 PM
2

Strawman. But fine, here: gentlemen, what would you say about some bloke who moves all the money out of the joint account and then begins persuading the woman not to lawyer up? That is the question you are asking, not the strawman argument you want us to lap up.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:54 PM
3

I've seen a significant increase in newcomers who straight up downvote me into oblivion for the silliest things. I'm fairly certain this sub's been invaded and the goal is to get the veterans to disperse. 10+ years since I first posted here. Check for yourself.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:45 PM
1

I understand, and that was understood. Just trying to help you, too. Wasn't assuming any pity party.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:39 PM
2

Remember, it'll never be perfect, the world, the people, the conditions. Nothing will ever be stable and safe, not really. I know I run the risk of giving advice that sounds an awful lot like "man up" and "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps (magically)", but it's never too late to save yourself. Is it more lonely out here in the wild these days? Sure. Are the walls closing in slowly? Yes, it's not in your head, they actually are. Does it seem like it's you against the world? Well, it kind o…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:45 PM
1

...alright, so, wait a minute, I think you're onto something. Let's figure out how to trap a unicorn. Surely it would be downhill from there. Worst-case, we have a unicorn, fed, protected, and happy in the forest. I mean, it's worth a shot... Dibs on Link when we get bored and start cosplaying.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:04 PM
3

Therapy. Therapy is where you start. You are ready to talk, please schedule a visit with a therapist. Talk. Talk it all out. Keep talking. You're not broken simply by seeking a therapist, throw that bullshit out the window, it's bogus nonsense injected into us along with manning up and not crying when it fucking hurts. Therapy is where you start, to answer you general question directly and immediately. Do it for yourself. Do it, please.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:55 PM
0

I never said anything about censorship. Or gates. I hear what you're saying, do you hear what I'm saying?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:59 PM
0

These last couple of weeks whenever I chime in, I've just noticed "male" be coupled with "white" more often than not. It's not some objective theoretical framework, it's just a hunch based on recent experience. I'm very surprised to see such backlash from others for making a simple observation, and am still waiting on men from other ethnicity to chime in. Don't you find it odd they haven't, and the mere observation and request is ill-received and already grossly misinterpreted? I sure do.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:50 PM
0

I must have offended you. My apologies. The echo chamber isn't a theory, just a hunch. As I stated to begin with, I could be wrong, and that's fine. Just trying to help.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:48 PM
1

As I said, I don't think it's intentional. The link in the post goes to another where "white male" is used rather often, as per your request for examples.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:47 PM
2

Inside the Criminal Mind - Samenow Invisible Man - Ellison Crime and Punishment - Dostoevsky The Count of Monte Cristo - Dumas Shooting/gun, knife, bow, camping, tracking survival guides Enabling Comprehensive Situational Awareness - Barayni, Johnson, Radke Overcoming PTSD - any author who is a qualified psychiatrist/psychologist. Encyclopedias on history, anatomy, and geography (where we come from, how we tick, and working with our surroundings)
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:01 PM
1

I think maintaining a healthy, life-long relationship is a struggle for all of us, not in a bad way mind you, but relationships take effort. Just sincerity and effort, that's all. This topic is all about the narrow point of ingress to said potential relationships based on singular physical attributes - height, specifically, comes up most often. So I'd just ask myself, "where in the world am I not judged based on my supposed shortcomings?" - my working theory is fairly basic: for white males, not…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:40 PM
1

Will do, thank you.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:32 PM
2

I think that's a lesson in and of itself: people with money have money because they don't flaunt it or brag about it. We don't hide it or keep it a secret, we just don't see the benefit of bringing it up. We may think differently, but the point remains the same, I believe.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:20 PM
1

Happy to give you a good laugh. Yes, Chinese. The world is filled with men and women with various backgrounds, upbringings, bottom lines, principles, moral laws, and so on. I very often suggest to men who are struggling to find a decent partner that they look outside of the states entirely. In short: American women - hard pass.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:18 PM
7

Dr. Livesey Well shit, my hair is turning pretty white these days... You got me in a box here.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:38 AM
45

I've got bad news for you buddy. You can win the lottery, be tall, handsome, intelligent, well-educated, self-employed, financially stable+, come from good stock, kind, considerate, big dick, also swinging, charming, good with friends and family, loved by all, interested and supportive... You're still just a swipe and an asset. Sorry. I did win the lottery. I'm in no better position than you. Doesn't matter who you are, men are all in the same boat on this one. All of us. Impossible to meet the …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:48 PM
6

Sir, I must inform you that you are writing words that are ungentlemanly, please behave, the lady folk may be watching.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:58 AM
3

Indeed! "Here son, something called Zelda and a giant, red LOTR book, now grow up to be a doctor or something." I am grateful to my parents. Very grateful.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:52 AM
1

Listen to people. Be decent, kind, and respectful. Don't lie. Keep your word. Support those who need support when you can. People will complain, people will judge. Let them. You're busy doing all the above. Only you can define what kind of a man you will be. Once defined, however, note the keyword 'man' in that sentence.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:32 PM
5

Yep, we exist, got the unicorn and white elks in the backyard to prove it. But really, it's not impossible, you just have to understand that marriage has become the new dating, except divorce is fucking hell for men and breaking up is like...calling Steve and asking to borrow his truck. So the trial-and-error fail/fail/fail/succeed model is still applied. It has just been extended into the "let's sign a legally binding document to prove our love!" realm, and that's where you should draw the line…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:57 PM
7

You know what really pisses me off? I was raised by, and grew up with, women. And I mean thousands of them. I have so many sisters and daughters I look after, and the husbands of the families and I have this sort of nod that says, "yeah, nobody is going to fuck with our ladies. Nobody." I end up owning a bunch of companies and forming a bunch of partnerships using my end as the technology provider for organizations, services, products, etc., in damn near every industry in existence. We have paid…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:02 PM
2

Voldemort born in the late 90s mate, of course he's having a shit go at it. Harry's transgender and shit is all out of whack for him. We need to get this bloke a wand. A wand made of misandry! /s
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:52 AM
1

Ditto.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:50 AM
1

You rootin' Australian fuck, gibin' yourself away ain't ya?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:48 AM
2

Nope. This right here is precisely the type of comment we should all be looking for. Not the person who needs therapy. Not the person who needs nothing. The person stuck in limbo that doesn't realize they're in limbo. shit-zen-giggles - I tell you now, ask yourself how much more would you want from life? We all here are ready to help you achieve it if and when the answer is more than 'nothing, I'm good.'. And this is why I love MR - not pushy, just honest. Leave it up to the gentleman to decide …
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:46 AM
3

Remember the roller-coaster of life, you are doing great now (which is awesome, really, I'm glad), but you weren't a year ago. A year from now if you're suicidal again, come back to this comment and remember, wait and hope, but never give in.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:35 AM
2

Touche!
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:00 PM
6

So we're friends now, simple as that.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:44 PM
3

Atta' boy clever mother fucker. edit see follow ups to understand edit.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:44 PM
3

Indeed, how are you OP? We all hope you're well, too.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:40 PM
7

Broken, bruised, forgotten, sore. Those who get the reference know I'm doing just fine :).
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:37 PM
1

Alright, free country, do as you please. Just stating the facts on immigration fraud, don't mind me.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:49 PM
0

This is fraud and is a federal offense. It's also one of the ways American men are getting screwed royally right now, but is still flying low and under the radar for some reason. Marry an immigrant to help them get their papers, willingly and intentionally, will have you sitting in front of an FBI agent at USCIS lying about how you're happily married and it isn't for the benefits or papers. Again, illegal. If you're fooled into loving someone who needs papers, see how quickly they turn on you wh…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:50 AM
3

"101 things men do wrong" by, some woman. Paraphrasing Dave Chappelle, because he's always right. 80% of the time. All the time.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:57 AM
2

I'm glad you're making observations and taking notes, but don't get too anxious or wrapped up and trapped in the darker corners of these topics, remember that you're 22 and you have many, many other things to do. These topics can be discussed whenever you'd like. When you feel like they're closing in around you and you feel helpless, it's time for a walk kid, or take the dog to the lake, or go build a wall out of concrete blocks and make some Molotov cocktails with some friends and blow it up th…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:04 PM
1

Document everything. Tell your friends and family. Call the abuse hotline and just talk it out with someone to get it all out there instead of holding it all in. If you find yourself somehow alone with her, record audio and keep phone in pocket and be polite and do not react, only politely respond and stick to the facts. Friends and family and a truck, find a place to put everything (storage or a new location), and you'll be out of there in four hours. Write an email saying goodbye after you hav…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:44 PM
2

A bit jaded, and not entirely correct. It's definitely an American thing, I can tell you that much. You could be in the top 5% and I can tell you firsthand, it wouldn't matter. In America, the scales are inverted and the game is rigged. a 2/10 only accepts (and expects!) at least an 8/10 guy, while the 8/10 guy can't even get the attention of an 8/10 girl who only accepts (and expects!) 10s. But it's lonely in the top tier, for both men and women. Personally, I just don't play the game, I know i…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:27 PM
1

Projection. Try therapy. Approach cautiously. But try. Sorry to hear about the abuse, everyone here has been there, it's why we're here. "Which desire is stronger: my desire for her absence, or my desire for her abuse?"
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:15 PM
12

Dear bot, in most cases you would be correct, but in this instance a 'this' was genuinely warranted. Thank you for your kindness regardless.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:04 PM
35

You've hit the nail on the head. A lot of us Gerard Butler's didn't give up entirely, we just gave up on American women. And you know, it's working out pretty nicely for us lot, too. No anger, no anti-feminism, no resentment - just...no more American women. Straight up friend-zoning the entire gender outright.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:59 PM
7

American women. Yes. Not sworn off as in ostracized, sworn off as in we're only ever going to be just friends. I have many sisters, and friendships are easy and fun with women when you genuinely and sincerely have no hidden agenda and are straight up "I'm never going to hit on you so don't bother, it just ain't gonna happen sister, cool? Can we get tacos now and bitch about shit? Awesome, and go."
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:41 PM
2

USCIS requests I do not share such stories. That should tell you enough. I'm happy you're happily married, really. Nationality be damned, good people are good people.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:14 AM
1

We're talking about China here, so...I don't doubt you. Shanghai is not Nanjing. I had to learn a great deal about each region before even entertaining the idea of relationships. No different than anywhere else. Marry New Jersey or Seattle, wholly different outcomes. Not saying one is good and the other bad, just - huge difference, same country, different regions. cough Nanjing, no shit, the real women are there, sir. cough
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:12 AM
8

For those men out there who have been beaten down and abused, I can skip most the chapters in this book and flip to the end for you. It was advice my father gave me after I divorced and left a most abusive relationship many years ago: "You are a victim now, but no longer. You are in pain now, but it will pass if you ignore everyone and focus on healing yourself. When you are ready, be the thing you wish to attract, and you'll find you don't have to avoid the abusers because they're filtered out …
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:42 PM
14

Do more than consider it, use your anger as motivation and begin investing in yourself to fend off those cruel and vicious villains: apathy and depression. I'm sorry Japan didn't work out. I can verify Korea doesn't play out nicely either with my own sob story. Learning Mandarin and going with China, however, has changed my life and allowed me to find the woman of my dreams. Side note: goddamnit COVID knock it off already. PM me when you need a friend/ally. I'd be more than happy to help you fin…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:30 PM
2

I am a strong advocate for good upbringing and family values. It is like a litmus test for yourself as well as your potential/existing SO. Remove all other variables except this one, and you'll find this equation becomes incredibly simple: are you ethical, are you trying to be ethical, do you have bottom lines, do they, is it taught in the family, are you going to teach it once you have a family? Yes or no. If Yes, proceed. If no, avoid.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:26 PM
7

Did the same thing. We should be friends. high five - traditional Chinese women are fantastic partners, excellent people. Being good enough to be accepted by them and their family means you're one hell of a bloke too, to boot. Another high five on the house, go team.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:13 PM
5

It's a gamble, I'll give you that, but not always the case. If you married a woman with strong bottom lines and a good upbringing, you'll find yourself living in multiple countries and having a blast because you both checked out of society and its stupid rules. So don't let it hold you back from at least trying, is what I'm saying here. It's all about the strength of the people and their tacit agreement together, Western culture doesn't automatically poison a person simply by breathing the air a…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:08 PM
6

I see this as an opportunity for the entire world, really. Not just for the neglected/discarded/disposable men, but for any person who is in a country or culture where their number has been artificially and forcibly deflated (in America, if you're a man, you could be a dazzling 10, yet somehow you're just a meh 6, and it's baffling...really...). The opportunity, you ask? Learn a foreign language, study another culture, explore, travel, learn, love. I say this as a happily married man who had not…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:55 PM
22

GWW asked for a plausible rejoinder to the statement, "Mr. Speaker, I'm flattered you're so interested in my vagina, but blah blah blah," so here goes: "Ms. Brown, we're discussing dry, boring legislation in an attempt to artificially inflate its significance and thus increase its visibility and likelihood for perceived importance. However, I fully understand how you may have confused this with your vagina. Also, tautologies should be avoided because of their redundant and obvious nature, so whi…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:42 PM
19

According to this slow talker Ad hominem, right out of the gate. The immediate and unnecessary insult gives you away. This is, in part, because in a situation where a woman is punched and kidnapped, it indicates a "healthier relationship" if her boyfriend goes out and saves her than if he totally ignores her being kidnapped. He states clearly that wanting to help your SO who has been punched and kidnapped is indicative of a healthy relationship, not that a woman being punched and kidnapped is in…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:49 AM
1

Adding to yoinkmasta107's comment, try not to be unnecessarily paranoid either. It sounds as if you're worried about the possibility of her sending nude photographs to your phone, and if that happens - just delete them. Also, be a sport and let her know that she's too young for you, and while you can be friends - if that's what you both have agreed upon - you cannot have a romantic or sexual relationship with her until she's of age. My only concern here is the paranoid step you're taking after t…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:32 AM
2

Excellent video. One quick observation: Around 8:30, a Venn diagram is presented and it is suggested that a combination of three of the areas within the diagram are not, or cannot reasonably be, intersected. I think that the anecdotal evidence presented by the MGTOW combined with the liberal and academic perspective, create the most powerful types of individual in the MRM. It's not enough to feel that a thing is right based on your own experiences, which could very well taint your perspective an…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:01 PM
2

Your sources: A seven year old paper cautioning that we must treat PAS as a theory just like everything else. Does not call it pseudo-science. A five year old paper stating that the legitimacy and significance of PAS is up for debate - just like everything else, so this isn't particularly useful or special or unique or...anything. Does not call it pseudo-science. A fourteen year old article. Explains PAS. Does not call it pseudo-science. I hate when people use research without reading or even at…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:09 PM
7

Friendly neighborhood doctor of Computer Science here. I know she's just bluffing, as you can't realistically trace physical locations from IP addresses (say, by using geoip and determining the ISP of the IP and deducing general location from there). However, with IPv6, you can realistically pinpoint the person's location as the user's computer's MAC address is bound to the address itself (I can see that while your IP changed, your MAC did not, so you may have gone from IP#1 to IP#2, but if IP#1…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:37 AM
-1

Wow, I would date you in a heartbeat. Oh wait...
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:29 PM
7

Let me help you out here. UGA has roughly 40,000 to 45,000 people on campus - it's arguably the largest party university in the US because of its proximity to Downtown Athens, which has 100 bars within a three mile radius. 2010 Crime Statistics: 6 confirmed sexual offenses, 3 confirmed rapes. 2009 Crime Statistics: 7 confirmed sexual offenses, 2 confirmed rapes. 2008 Crime Statistics: 5 confirmed sexual offenses, 0 confirmed rapes. If there's a rape culture, I sure as hell don't know where they …
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:27 AM
2

You can start with it being satirical, albeit poorly written so I can understand how it may appear to be a genuine college opinion piece.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:31 AM
1

The thing is, it's probably completely fair to say that the 15 year old would be elated. Are you referring to a 15 year old boy specifically, or 15 year old teenagers in general? If you're speaking generally, then yes, I agree that 15 is old enough to get the sexy-tingles in one's pants. If you're trying to say that this is some gender based characteristic, where only boys get those sexy-tingles at 15, then I disagree. Informed consent is how the law operates, so you're right to touch on it. It …
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:58 AM
1

No no, you have another upvote, I insist.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:08 AM
2

That really varies by country, by journalist, and by case. Absolutely, but we're talking about America and instances of rape accusations here. When viewed through this lens, it's a verifiable fact that males are not given the benefit of the doubt the vast majority of the time. Even if men aren't always afforded the same benefit of the doubt, that doesn't change the fact that Ana Kasparian is doing the right thing here. All people accused of crimes (regardless of gender) deserve the benefit of th…
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:04 AM
1

How would the victim's sexual orientation alter the situation?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:00 AM
2

Ah, I should have clarified. We don't disagree on this point, but I didn't qualify my observation. I agree that we should discuss the alleged nature of a crime before anything's been proven, but men aren't afforded the same luxury. The point that I failed to make is this: when the media discusses an alleged rape and the perpetrator is male, they rarely use words like "allegedly". For men, it's guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:12 AM
22

I find it interesting that when there's no man to blame, they're uncertain as to who or what to blame. The video begins with Ana Kasparian egregiously using the word "allegedly" when describing the event. This is preposterous because the statement is followed directly by, "[...] found this woman naked and later on the 15 year old boy said that the woman did indeed try to kiss him". Immediately after that, Cenk Uygur states, "woah woah, half naked, she still had her bra on [...] this is a whole d…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 08:26 PM
5

Agreed. For me this boils down to a single observation: You know how we're frustrated when feminists group all MRAs together when some random person claiming they're an MRA says something blatantly retarded/mysogynistic? Well that's how the silent majority feels when we blast those who are trying to get it. I'm not talking about the fringe feminists, either - the extremists are grouped together, and people rarely argue against observations of extremists. I'm talking about /r/ladymras, /r/TwoXChr…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:38 PM
10

DoctorStorm, why are you so awesome at everything, absolutely breathtaking, and adored by men, women and children worldwide? Oh I just don't know! I guess it's just luck, you know. Bless you all.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:03 PM
5

The post is well structured, and hinged on a predictable template/format. He itemizes his grievances in accordance to severity, with respect to the MRM talking points. This means, more or less, that he has a firm grasp on what's important, what's not, and what needs to be handled first. Is he depressed? Yes. Is he suicidal? I don't think so. If he were suicidal he'd be falling apart. There would be no discernible structure. All that said, suicide notes usually contain something along the lines o…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:49 PM
13

"[...] and all the fellas at reddit.com [...]" I like the hat tip to /r/mensrights without saying it was /r/mensrights. Good strategic move. He'd catch a lot of shit had he thanked us specifically.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:23 AM
1

The peer review process, like all human activities, is subject to groupthink and conformity. So sometimes you have to go to a less prestigious journal that is more willing to publish work outside the norm. Aye. I think he was trying to forestall the inevitable attacks of misogyny and anti-feminism by asserting some feminist credentials. Interesting perspective, but it only holds if your premise is accurate. I.e. he could be pandering, I agree, but only if we're correct in thinking that he has to…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 03:16 PM
1

then it's possible that the author [...] had some trouble finding an outlet to publish this work Yes and no. You should also take into consideration that we can't simply publish wherever, whenever. You have a point, but it becomes even harder when finding a target pub because you can only publish in relevant journals and they only occur so often. In other words, I don't necessarily disagree with you, I'm merely pointing out that this could very well be the only journal that takes this specific k…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:45 PM
2

The Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma has a not so great impact factor, so to begin with I'd take the research with a grain of salt. It doesn't mean it's bound to be bad research, it simply means it's likely that it's not heavily referenced, referencing properly (using cited vs. uncited publications), etc. The study was conducted and the research was published fairly recently (2009), so that's good. Conclusion: the same percentage of women as men physically assault their partners, a…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:07 AM
2

Hm, her heart's in the right place, but the delivery is awful. I genuinely disagree with the message and direction here for a variety of reasons. To begin, they identify three reasons boys are essentially failing at life. They are: 1: They have too much confidence re: "swagger" The term "swagger" only started trending in 2008, and to suggest that it's become a popular lyric for this generation's boys and thus is indicative of their poor performance is a bit much. Overconfidence is an issue, but …
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:52 AM
24

Hm, viable research, vetted references, sound arguments, realistic conclusions... Probability that this will be rejected by feminists: 94%. Edit Before the downvote brigade comes along and rains on my parade, my comment refers to my disdain with the research/feminism catch-22. Whenever we're in an argument and present evidence, they demand research. When research is presented, it's not good enough or doesn't count as research. When we demand research, we often don't get it. When we do get it, we…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 01:05 AM
3

I've been keeping a close watch on this since June 18th. June 20th, after we started aggressively supporting the Brian Banks Story here through /r/mensrights/, there were several more $1k donors and a $2.5k donor. It takes a village, but an instantaneous ~$5k certainly helps.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 02:30 AM
1

It goes against what people have been led to believe, nothing more. Most people don't question these things, and thus reject dissenting opinions outright. You were right to ask, and I hope my perspective helped better explain the concept of triggering with regards to the crime of rape.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 01:44 AM
12

Victory.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:13 PM
10

Please note: the website's running JavaScript to check and see if you're logged in to Facebook. Not that this is harmful, but it certainly isn't harmless. What they do with that information, who knows, but do be aware that it's entirely possible for your vote to be bound to your Facebook profile. It doesn't appear that this is explicit or obvious, either, it's merely something that's going on behind the scenes. The only thing that's missing is the FB.getLoginStatus() function call, which could b…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:34 AM
2

Right you are, let me put a link directly to the KickStarter in the OP. Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 05:06 AM
3

I don't necessarily agree that "SRS got PBS shilling for them", though. Someone from SRS managed to get a small spot in a single video under the domain of PBS, and there was a decent amount of community backlash as people were quick to point out how hypocritical of a move this was, and how disingenuous the inclusion of an SRS representative was. Again, though, it's not that I don't see your point or that I think it's utterly impossible, I just think you're emphasizing SRS's significance and infl…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:33 AM
5

That's a bit extreme. Bad press is bad press, and we're all going to have to deal with it eventually, but the headline you suggested has a relatively low probability of ever existing in reality. Not to say it couldn't, mind you, but to get to that headline, the following must exist: A mainstream media outlet An author who publishes through the mainstream media outlet that believes that /r/mensrights is an internet hate group despite the amount of evidence contradicting/falsifying this notion. Us…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:08 AM
6

Clearly, we are not, and don't want to be presented as, an internet lynch mob who wants evil things to happen to her. We're not calling for her rape, decapitation, or for anyone to hogtie her and throw her onto a bullet ant mound. I agree, but what does this have to do with the post, the documentary, or the KickStarter funding for the documentary?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:52 AM
2

I however feel and have donated with no expectations of "MRA" representation in the video series. As a matter of fact, I even wish the MRM would distance itself a bit from the story so it can stand on its own merits. Very good point.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:27 AM
15

I think we just became best friends.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:12 PM
2

Go Team.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:02 PM
9

If you do 250, I'll match you, then the OP will match us. Win/Win, all the rest be damned.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:29 AM
1

In theory, yes. In practice, not really. To begin with, unless your studying the exact fields practiced by your major professor or committee, then you're actually educating them as you're educating yourself. For the vast majority of PhD candidates, this is the case. My major professor didn't have any experience in my field specifically, but she did have experience tangentially. This is about as much as you can hope for unless you're looking to do exactly what they do, which isn't very often the …
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:41 AM
3

Perhaps. Although I don't hold your opinion, it certainly wouldn't hurt to share more information. Oddly enough, the field was Computer Science, and it ranks in the top 100 of programs nationwide. The school itself is in the top 75.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:25 AM
1

I don't follow. If I were to provide the study, and rank of said study in the school and in general, would it change the nature of my initial comment? If so, how do you believe it would?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:05 AM
1

Why, precisely, do you believe that it would help?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:55 AM
12

Thanks friend. Please don't set me on fire.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:25 AM
34

$100. Proof. See you at the wrap party. $250, as per a gentlemen's agreement between cuteman and I. Proof. See you in the film credits. Edit: I'd like to point out that the lowest donation ($2 before they upped the donation) is more highly ranked than the highest donation ($100 at the time of writing this edit), and it tells me that our community gives a shit about giving a shit - not about the amount of the donation itself. I'm very proud of /r/mensrights right now.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:56 AM
6

I don't necessarily disagree, but another way of looking at it is that the advisor was properly preparing the female PhD candidates while holding the male PhD candidates to a higher, sometimes impossible, standard. I honestly believe the female PhD candidates graduated with enough know-how to do just fine in their respective job markets. It's really the higher standard the males were held to, translating into an unnecessarily larger amount of work and thus longer amount of time, that I'm speakin…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 10:41 PM
9

Sure, but I find myself lacking the necessary quantities of piss and vinegar nowadays. I understand that the response can be met, and defeated painlessly, with your logical rebuttal, but lately I've made it a point to just spread information and drop a bit of anecdotal evidence from time to time. I genuinely don't have the time or patience to fight logically with the illogical anymore. The second I read nonsense, I block the user outright. I won't allow our opponents to take anything more from m…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:14 PM
4

I wholeheartedly agree.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:30 PM
49

For those brave college students out there, please be wary. Understand that there's truth to these observations, but be careful when acting on them. When I was in graduate school, I noticed that my major professor, who was female, was allowing the female PhD candidates to graduate with fewer than three publications (three is the department's minimum) and far sooner than the male PhD candidates. Upon pointing this out to her, I was chewed out for being ungrateful, and she distanced herself from m…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:45 PM
2

This should serve as a bit of an eye opener for those sitting on the fence with regards to circumcision being properly redefined as male genital mutilation (MGM), and think that it's merely some moot debate between the MRM and feminists. Here we have the collective forming the same, or similar, conclusions as the MRM. This is what happens when you give people the information from both sides and ask them to make up their own minds. All we have to do is keep telling the truth and sticking to the f…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:48 AM
-5

You know how soldiers with PTSD may flip their shit if some random war scene comes on TV? Triggering is when that soldier sees that scene. It "triggers" him. In this instance, the rape scene "triggers" the women who have been raped. You have to understand why this is a non-issue. It's not because "triggering" doesn't exist, it's because "triggering" isn't something that belongs to rape, or to women. If "triggering" were a genuine issue, then there'd be no war on TV, no drug use, no violence, no …
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:33 AM
1

What feminists are attempting is coercive persuasion through a general sense of guilt brought on by years indoctrination. Language control, such as suggesting we can't joke about rape, is part of it. Language control is a form of thought control. The end goal here is to adjust our collective understanding and expectations with regards to rape. Feminists want rape to belong to women, and for everyone to treat it more seriously than a European street sweeper would the Bubonic plague. We have to ex…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:59 AM
3

The book, as well as Bordo, makes the fatal mistake of confusing generalizations and observations with hard science. She's never struck me as particularly vulgar or overtly sexist, and I was glad to see a feminist discuss the societal perceptions of the male physique in a cold, calculating fashion. However, she doesn't really have many high quality ideas. She consistently strings together basic observations, forms conclusions based on preexisting biases and assumptions, throws these conclusions …
/r/MensRights15/06/12 11:04 PM
3

It isn't always in quotes, but I do agree that downplaying the concept of a woman raping someone else by quoting the very word itself is inappropriate right now. I think quoting the word in general is a good idea, though. We eventually want to get our society to the point that accusations of crime are not the same as the crime it represents. If they want to quote the word, then quote the word, as it adds credence to the fact that an accusation of rape is not rape per se. If it's standard practic…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:07 PM
12

Specifically, it means that hiring someone else to physically harm or murder another human being can be considered a form of defense. The precedent this would set is downright unsettling. The offense of conspiracy to murder is not a form of self-defense. Period. Edit: I said "precedence" instead of "precedent". I blame computer science.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:57 PM
11

Laurie Penny is a woman, not a man. Laurie Penny. Pop culture and radical politics with a feminist twist. That should give you a better understanding of this nonsense attempting to pass as viable journalism.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:53 PM
1

When a woman propositions a man, he can also respond in one of two ways; he can say “yes” or he can say “yes, please.” He has no realistic choice to say no. Why weren't the findings enough for the author? The statistical analysis says a lot about the power of female choice, and it was enough to make a solid argument and decent article. Why did they have to add the blatantly incorrect opinion at the end? It changes the tone of the article from, "obese women have sex more frequently and with more …
/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:42 PM
3

I feel like it's an unimportant issue being thrust on me over and over and over (pun intended.) Is someone forcing you to frequent /r/mensrights? Is someone forcing you to click on the links leading to these discussions? Are you really attempting to convince me that this "unimportant issue" is being thrust upon you? I know I'm right, and you know you're right, and we're never going to get along on this issue. It's not about getting along. The goal is to not get along. The goal is to get people t…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:34 AM
3

Look at the kind of responses I've gotten. Is this what adult discussion looks like to you? Logical fallacies and accusations of being a terrible person? Not to mention the suggestions to GTFO if I don't like it. I get them too, believe it or not. Ignore them, move on. It's just not something that can be fairly debated anywhere, because it's such an emotional issue. I agree, as do many others here, which is why we're adamantly opposed to ending the conversation. If this is one of the few places …
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:13 AM
2

But, he also acknowledged that if used inappropriately, empathy can smack of “I feel your pain,” that terribly condescending frame that sometimes gets put around efforts to relate and connect. Empathy doesn't "smack" of communicating that you have felt similar emotions or had similar experiences. Empathy consists of these things. Also, the article is directionless, and Sandler's spent the vast majority of her career focusing on women's issues, which leads me to believe this is her attempt to pan…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:07 AM
7

It doesn't happen often. It is very rare indeed. But sometimes threads in this subreddit make me smile. Sometimes they give me hope.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:58 AM
3

You're not taking part in the discussion, you're proposing we end the discussion. There's a difference. I post here all the time and am often met with downvotes and dissenting opinions. You could interpret that to mean we're all big meanies, or you could act like an adult and realize that you're being downvoted because you have an unpopular, and possibly inaccurate and biased, opinion. If you're downvoted, don't take it personally. Take it as an opportunity to turn the questions around on yourse…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:54 AM
3

Look, a circumcision ban failed to pass in the most outrageously, insanely, liberal city in America. It's not going to happen. It took roughly a century of fight before the 19th ammendment was ratified. So no, we're not giving up. Just because we can't change the world in a day, doesn't mean we'll wave the white flag and all go home.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:50 AM
1

I mention Briffault's law only in that it makes sense within the context of evolutionary psychology and the differing costs/risks/benefits of reproduction between men and women. When the essence of Briffault's law is abstracted out, we have a proposed truth: animals associate with other animals based on the perceived, and realized, benefits of the association itself. When applied to humans and gender, it appears that the law suggests women would refuse to associate with men unless they perceived…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:04 PM
0

Well, there's a difference between The Patriarchy--that is, feminist ideas on societal power structures and their origins (M/f, and all the evil men's fault)--and small p patriarchy, which is simply a system under which families were organized that placed fathers at the head of the household. To be clear, I don't disagree with you here. If anything, I wholeheartedly agree. As far as I know, there aren't statistical analyses of women's current dating/relationship patterns. OKCupid releases trends…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:40 PM
1

I'm actually of the mind that small p patriarchy was likely a way of managing women's hypergamy in order to maintain stable long-term pairings. There are indeed historical instances where private patriarchy suppressed hypergamy, thus leading many to believe that hypergamy was merely the reaction to private patriarchy and strengthened when shifting to public patriarchy. However, reading Meade et al. and Fan et al., and observing the shift from private to public patriarchy and the relationship sha…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:05 PM
2

So either the surveys from the Bureau of Justice are wrong, or the surveys yielding lifetime rates are wrong. It's also possible that since they're surveys, they're both very flawed. This is what people harp on the most when attempting to persuade others of the "1 in 4" concept. The misinformation and rhetoric we often see spread (even in this thread by a Redditor with a brand new account!), for example, is how people argue for the concept. They will not address the facts per se, but inflate exi…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:16 PM
2

I think we have to try to move away from the idea that hypergamy is a "flaw" in female psychology. Hypergamy carries a stigma weighted similarly to that of patriarchy. For each, there is the literal definition and historical perspective of the concept, which few of us can reasonably, logically, sanely disagree with. Then we have the revisions of the concepts, where biases and subjective perspectives are attached to the concept itself and passed off as the better, more accurate version. Patriarch…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:39 AM
2

Ah, a fellow computational theorist! Good day sir! Be careful here, though, as a mathematical or computational heuristic is not like a psychological heuristic. There are similarities, but they are genuinely distinct. Read up on the definitions, you'll have no problem understanding the differences.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:33 AM
2

I'm not sure if you saw the edit in my previous comment, but it helps explain heuristics a bit. Also, this has decent examples to help better understand evolutionary psychology as well. It's a bit of a read, but go through it, and feel free to come back and ask questions if you're confused or think you've spotted some blatant error.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:22 AM
3

Hm, I feel you've been given a very limited view of evolutionary psychology. I certainly don't fault you for it, as most people (especially undergraduates who haven't quite figured out how social sciences actually work) think these types of sciences are just "guess work". I disagree with you for the most part, and it's because I've spent a great deal of time in and around this area. What I can say specifically, however, is that it's not guess work as it relies on heuristic analyses comprised of …
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:00 AM
3

Excuse me while I be a pedantic ass, clears throat pedantically. It could mean that women are gold-digging sluts, but we have to step back and attach specific meaning to the words being used, while removing any biases and subjective assumptions from these words as well. Gold-digging: pejorative, yes, but means the person seeks a mate based primarily on the amount of currency they have and their ability to create more currency on demand. Slut: again, pejorative, but means a promiscuous woman. It …
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:53 AM
6

There's a difference between inherently qualitative science and pseudoscience. Anthropology, for example, isn't like chemistry or math. We can't create specific mathematical formulae and models to determine precisely how effective the bow and arrow was for Genghis Khan when he was off conquering the world. We can pull a lot of qualitative information together, however, and create falsifiable theories that can be strengthened or defeated with additional evidence. Evolutionary Psychology, and Psyc…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:35 AM
4

I educate locally. Given what I do, I'm often talking nonstop all day every day. I also find myself in situations where there's a crowd listening to what I'm saying, and often trusting me to be accurate, factual. It's just plain ol' responsibility in the end, but it's enough to effectively allow me to bring Men's Rights to the forefront of other people's minds. I've lost friends and made enemies, but I've also brought a proper, clear understanding of the MRM to countless individuals. I'd like to…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:21 PM
3

I agree, as I've had similar experiences. I've found an absolutely stellar American woman, and she's been nothing but compassionate and understanding - even when the topics threaten her ideals and beliefs, such as rejecting the institute of marriage. That said, the probability of finding these types of women in America is staggeringly low, and I think the anecdotal evidence and statistical evidence discussed in this forum strengthens the notion that while some American women get it, the vast maj…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 08:55 PM
1

Ah, sorry. Servers don't have to be paid minimum wage here. Because "tipped workers" receive tips, the restaurants are allowed to pay them lower than minimum wage. Is it that college students are cheap/poor and don't tip? People are pretty cheap here regardless of the demographic - especially church people. My SO hates working Sunday because she has to put up with people who genuinely believe that working on Sunday is a sin, she should be in church, and thus she doesn't deserve a tip. When all i…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:30 PM
1

I'd like to know why /r/mensrights has been targeted for a poorly worded, vague "survey" from a "psychologist". I know how these things work, and you've given yourself away by targeting a specific subset of people. Please expose your methods and have the mods verify your intentions and the legitimacy of this survey. Until then, I suggest no one take the survey as it could be an attempt to extract information about our community in order to use it against us. For example: if twenty of us take the…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:17 PM
1

Minimum Wage is $5.15 where we live, and by "on paper" I mean $1.15 is what appears on her paychecks and her W-2 as her hourly rate. While things are fairly cheap here, she works only 12-15 shifts a month because she's attending college full time, which translates roughly to $110-$138/mo on paper. Tips make up for this of course, but on a bad month it's genuinely bad. Summer in a college town, for example, puts her in situations where she walks away without any tips at all some nights. I supplem…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 11:33 AM
1

Well, I'm Canadian, for one. Minimum wage here is about $9/hour. And therein lies the difference, not to be captain obvious or anything. I wanted to check with my SO to be sure, and she said she makes $1.15/hour on paper. Edit: Given the upvotes/downvotes, I think people believe we're arguing here. I hope you haven't been given the same impression.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:01 PM
1

I found this bit rather interesting: Banks served five years and two months in prison, but in a strange turn of events, the woman later recanted her claim and offered to help Banks clear his name after he was out of prison. Recanting is seemingly so uncommon that it's "strange". Not to suggest this is some damning aspect of the article, I just wanted to point it out as it gives us some idea as to the public's general opinion regarding false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 10:39 PM
1

So what you're saying is, we should submit our own FAQs individually? I keed, I keed.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:36 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood to the point that I thought you were suggesting cooks make that much, but I still disagree with the suggestion that servers make $20-60/hour. Mind you, I'm dealing solely in anecdotal evidence here, so if that's the range you're usually working with, then rock on. I disagree because I see $20/hour as the good night. Specifically, Waffle House/Denny's types of restaurants in Southeast America. My SO has been a server for several years now, and on a bad night she'll walk away w…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:24 PM
2

I wouldn't call $20-60/hour a ridiculously low amount of money, though. I was referring to the Nickled and Dimed types of cooks and servers in America who are nowhere near ~$40/hour. I agree that ~$40/hour is a decent amount of money, but I don't think you'll find any Waffle House or Bob's Burgers servers who are actually making that. I'll take my minimum wage over the cook's $12/hour starting wage any day, frankly. I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing, but this was more or less my poi…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:53 PM
2

Adding to your observation: Cooks are often male, kept out of sight, and paid through the business directly. Their income is tracked and taxed as per their W2 (American tax form). Servers are often female, kept in plain sight, and make most of their money through tips. Their income is not necessarily tracked and taxed, as it's up to the individual to report their earnings. Rest assured the vast majority of people in this position do not. Being a server has nothing to do with this phenomena, it's…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:22 AM
4

Removing video games entirely is becoming a common, and supported, suggestion. I agree that parents seeking validation of fears will find it regardless of Zimbardo's research, but the last thing we need to be doing is giving them more reasons. Especially when these reasons haven't been properly vetted, and the "symptoms" aren't fully understood. One aspect of the argument I often bring up in this debate, is that the current and subsequent generations are using video game consoles to facilitate r…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:07 PM
9

Aside from my issues with the article, I'd personally like to know how he feels about the culture he's created. Specifically, he has validated the baseless fears of overbearing parents that any and all male children who play video games and/or look for porn are on the "bad" path. Since he has validated these fears, parents are now removing video games entirely from the household, and placing their male children in therapy when any pornography is found. Given time, I believe this will further inc…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:33 PM
16

When advocating men's rights at this point in time, we have to understand and accept the fact that we're not going to receive much, if any, immediate gratification. Remain logical, reasonable. Continue providing proof to strengthen, or invalidate, your theories. People aren't going to change their minds as soon as you're done speaking. So plant the seed, continue the conversation, try to walk away from the situation amicably, and hope for the best. If you're looking to change, "women only make 7…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:16 PM
1

No need to wonder. In short: sexual suggestion for women = good, sexual suggestion for men = bad.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:08 PM
9

Ok, I've had enough. Let's crunch the numbers ourselves. Math/Statistics and Computer Science are what I do best, and there's absolutely no reason we shouldn't come together, gather as much data as possible, conduct research, and completely expose our methods and results. In other words, this would be an entirely transparent process. Furthermore, I'd like to have the research published. I can do this (research, publish) myself if there are no other Ph.D.s with research experience in the house, b…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:47 PM
5

I don't think it's the only way, but I do agree with the general sentiment. In my opinion, it's not so much about ensuring other people can't enter your space or use your resources, it's about the satisfaction of knowing you have your own space and resources. My SO and I keep almost everything separate in our relationship, and it's been nothing but beneficial to our health and individuality. Whenever one is in the need of something from the other, we simply ask.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:40 PM
0

Accuser unidentified Not weird, very typical. a couple of orthodox Jews going on a cruise This is utterly irrelevant. somehow getting tangled up with this accuser Very rarely does a woman accuse a man of rape if she doesn't even know his name. Some existing relationship, regardless of the superficiality, will most likely exist beforehand. If by "tangled up" you mean they met the woman on a boat and exchanged names, maybe had a few drinks, sure. That is about all you can do on a cruise boat. the …
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:36 AM
1

Yes, this is also a very good point. There's the law, then there's the interpretation of the law. If you were given a social worker's interpretation of the Chartier decision, for example, it wouldn't surprise me if their definition was slightly jilted based on their experiences. (agreeing with pcarvious, speaking to deeperwonder)
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:21 AM
1

Oh, no worries! I just wanted to spread some fact love since you were asking for thoughts. I assumed you were given bogus information, so I was merely trying to point out what, specifically, was wrong with the information you were given, while dropping in some good ol' Wikipedia to fill in the gaps.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:19 AM
11

No, I'm really not. If you're perceiving my questions as hostility, you are mistaken, so quit with the gaslighting. You're asking questions, I'm answering them with facts. You're making observations, I'm pointing out the inaccuracies and pushing out the assumptions.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 12:15 AM
17

There is zero hostility in my comment. I didn't find the story to be strange, nor did I find the article vague, thus why I asked you a series of simple, straight forward questions and stated that discussing false rape accusations isn't uncommon here. I'm just trying to read between the lines. I disagree, it appears you're entertaining hypothetical situations and pandering to conjecture. It's a very strange story with an enormous amount of money on the line. This isn't that strange of a story, bu…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 12:01 AM
2

First, you didn't state that Chartier v. Chartier was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada. Second, you left out the fact that this only applies to step-parents. In loco parentis can be stretched to include men merely acting out a fatherly role in a common law marriage, but this is rarely the case. Thus, In other words, if you dated a single mother for a year and had ANY relationship with the child that could be deemed as "father-like" (maybe you got him a toy for his birthday, or babysat them…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 10:40 PM
20

This doesn't seem to add up. What doesn't seem to add up? Granted, it might be just absurd bigotry That's precisely what it was, not what it might be. what is the whole story here? FTA: The men, both Orthodox Jews from Israel, said they flew to Fort Lauderdale on Feb. 27 and boarded the Liberty of the Seas, with plans to visit Haiti and Jamaica. But they claim that after climbing into their beds the first night, they were awakened at 5:00am local time by crew members who made them get dressed "i…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 10:19 PM
2

I think that fewer people can afford to GET out without completely fucking up their lifestyle and their children's lifestyle. Which is my interpretation of this topic as well. To further add to the statement, most couples are fairly normal, move in together to save money and because they'd like to live together, and stick together because it creates a more financially stable environment for themselves as well as their children - and genuinely love each other. I know I may catch hell from this, b…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 05:51 PM
8

You, too, can create a blog in 15 minutes and say whatever you'd like on the internet! Don't forget to put a ridiculous picture of yourself in the top right corner.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:44 PM
9

Which is interesting to me, because it puts /r/mensrights in the position feminists consistently claim to be. In the discussion you linked to, they were discussing how misogyny is essentially driving women away, making them wear "internet burkas" so to speak, but it's the guys who are actually shamed and driven away. Whenever there's a public discussion, such as the circumcision thread that was recently in TIL, it wasn't the women saying, "hotdog penises are ugly!" that were driven away, it was …
/r/MensRights02/06/12 06:56 PM
5

And that is why every time they attempt to paint us in a negative light, it seems like Reddit in general thinks we're as crazy as they are. Yet the number of subscribers to /r/mensrights goes up a few hundred, and the number of subscribers to SRS does not. The proof's in the pudding, as they say.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 06:43 PM
12

The more of these instances that occur, the more I realize we're not dealing with adults, we're dealing with kids in high school and undergraduate level college. I don't even think it's about sexism anymore. I think we're fighting a war on low self-esteem and mindless political correctness. It's not that guy A says something sexist to girl B, and I don't mean to suggest that couldn't possibly happen because it most assuredly does, but that guy A says something girl B doesn't like, girl B is offe…
/r/MensRights02/06/12 06:33 PM
1

Nicole Martins: two publications total. Kristen Harrison: five publications total. Communications Research (CR) Journal impact factor: 1.819 (not that great). Longitudinal study with 396 children (white and black male and female children): average of 100 white male children. So yes, it's entirely possible that two women who haven't been in the game very long, or published more than most grad students, somehow managed to show that 100 white male children, on average, subjectively expressed a high…
/r/MensRights02/06/12 05:40 AM
24

The realization itself is very depressing as well. We strive for a large portion of our lives to be better. Obtain a high quality degree, obtain higher education, obtain a great job, climb the corporate ladder to obtain a better job, obtain financial stability, obtain personal and emotional stability. Essentially, obtain attractiveness. Why? To get a wife of course! And then we realize that we don't actually want a wife. And we step back and look at what we've been doing. And we say to ourselves…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:27 PM
1

Causal link, yes, which is why, when conducting research, you'd want to identify and test against associative relationships. Divorce causes depression: not so great of a starting point. Increased levels of depression strongly associated with the event of divorce for all parties involved: closer to the mark. Also, I'm not trying to smack you around here or anything. I don't necessarily disagree with anything you're saying, I'm just trying to insert some sciencey goodness into the conversation.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:19 PM
1

This article, if not convincing, is further ammo. Indeed. We must start somewhere, and we must gather evidence along the way. Everything, regardless of its relative significance, must be considered.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:56 PM
5

A lawyer can be sidebarred, sure, but it takes sufficient reasoning and extreme cases for a judge to override a verdict or determine if a lawyer is competent enough to serve at the behest of their client. A judge can't simply say, "you're stupid, get another lawyer, see you guys next Wednesday," so even though he sees the lawyer crashing and burning, there's only so much he can do, and even less he's obligated to do.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:07 PM
11

Fair, although I don't think the following logical succession is that far fetched: Women more likely to hide money. Women more likely to receive alimony. Alimony is rewarded based on provable needs. Women receiving alimony is thus partially supported by their tendency to hide money. If a woman is more likely to hide money, it stands to reason that because she withholds important information about her financial standing, intentionally or otherwise, she has positioned herself to be more likely to …
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:41 PM
9

While I can see where this would be relevant when a judge is trying to decide whether or not a spouse needs alimony or child support during a divorce, I don't see how this relates to men's rights otherwise. If it's relevant, it relates, thus it's worthy of discussion in this forum. Sorry to be pedantic, but your paradoxical statement was making me twitch a bit.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:17 PM
1

Sure, but symptoms contributing to disorders are not additive or synergistic. The severity of the symptom determines the severity of the disorder, and nothing more. If a child is depressed due to poverty, and another child is depressed due to rifts in the structure of the family, a child depressed due to both is not doubly depressed. That said, a child subjected to extreme poverty could be doubly depressed. My point is, something like, "the rise in divorce has led to a rise in depression in chil…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:06 PM
1

I don't think you're asking for an in-depth analysis or lengthy explanation as to why these things occur, but look at it this way: There's this concept of the Caketriarchy, ok? Any man who, upon having cake with a woman, begins to eat his cake too, is expressing male dominance over the women and suppressing her to a lower level of the Caketriarchical hierarchy. Equipped with this knowledge you then go out and fight for justice! You are the Anti-Caketriarchy hero, smacking forks from the mouths o…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:49 PM
6

Absolutely. I wasn't detracting from the significance of the trend, I was merely noting that even though a trend can be proven to exist we should still consider the possibility that he had a bad lawyer. Regardless of that fact, though, I suppose you're still right. Bad lawyer or not, if it's a faulty conviction then someone needs to be fighting in his, and their, corner.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:39 PM
17

This was technically an act of common law arson. He'll be guilty if the prosecution can show that he did not possess the house. However, someone smarter than me may be able to shed some light on whether or not a mortgage implies that he does not have possession of the property, technically speaking. From Wikipedia- Mortgage: a mortgage is an encumbrance (limitation) on the right to the property just as an easement would be, but because most mortgages occur as a condition for new loan money, the …
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:15 PM
33

Carter's lawyer was a court-appointed public defender with the ink barely dry on her law school degree. She allowed Carter waive his right to a jury trial, permitted the prosecutor to submit the photo lineup as evidence and raised no objections to the prosecution's theory about why the semen and seminal fluid didn't match Carter's blood type. There is no record that she requested fingerprints from the scene from the police department. I was hoping the title was exaggerated or sensationalized. Al…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:02 PM
45

Dick Lindsey, President of the Alliance for Alimony Reform and divorced father of five, says even though Florida statutes are gender-neutral, the courts hand out (permanent) alimony with a bias against men and without consideration of their financial circumstances. This is an important aspect of the overarching argument of alimony reform. Legislate the ability for women to transfer wealth away from men upon divorce. Facilitate the process by allowing unreasonable sums of money to be transferred …
/r/MensRights31/05/12 01:57 PM
2

Sure thing, thanks Sigil1.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 01:43 PM
3

I would argue that our tendency to misdiagnose children with disorders has risen, not that our children are becoming dumber, slower, or more depressed.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:34 AM
3

The publication's abstract can be found here. The interpretation Whitney Heins and Catherine Crawley, as per the OP's link, is inaccurate, in my opinion. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, the authors have simply misinterpreted Sergey Gavrilets' research. They (Heins and Crawley) state: Using mathematical modeling, the associate director for scientific activities at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) at UT has discovered that the transformation may have…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:51 AM
3

To further add to your confusion, it's very commonly known in almost all research circles that you must avoid using vague terminology such as better and worse in academic research. If it's faster, how much faster, and compared to what. If it's more effective, how is effectiveness defined and measured. In general, always take better with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:25 AM
1

Be sure to determine if it's merely PAS from the mother. If they're regurgitating bullshit they've heard from their mother for decades, and the girl's reasonable, you can turn it into a discussion and over time actually help her understand how she really feels about her father. In general, though, you're absolutely correct here.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:36 AM
2

I'm not sure how details regarding the true horrors of modern war, specifically as experienced by draftees, are anything other than directly relevant. Because it's correlative at best, forced hyperbole at worst. Not to criticize your opinion, but this isn't a men's right's issue per se, this is.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 01:16 PM
2

Ah, I think there's a bit of miscommunication going on here. The intro threw me off, the fact that your account was a day old is suspect, but I absolutely read the article and found it rather interesting, rather agreeable. However, you posted it in /r/mensrights, and the article's tangential, at best, to the topics being discussed in this subreddit, being perfectly honest. Please, though, don't interpret my disdain for the intro of some article as me openly disagreeing with you. I was merely tak…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 12:57 PM
0

They're exposing this particular man's internal dialogue, and it allows the audience to see that he's bored, clever, interesting in keeping his girlfriend happy according to what she believes makes her happy, and interested in having sex with said girl. I honestly don't see any reason to be offended here.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 11:24 AM
1

Do these women think we don’t see them for the white male supremacists that they are? Hm, no I don't think they think that. However, let's take a look at woman-on-woman bullying, shall we? According to Phyllis Chesler: What attracts the media to woman-on-woman (WOW) bullying is the fact that women are targeted at a higher rate by female bullies (71%) than by male bullies (46%). Yes, women are crueler to women than they are to men, and that must be explained. It doesn't surprise me that women who…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 11:18 AM
2

WWII, the single most devastating event that has ever occurred, consuming tens of millions of souls in the span of 6 years. The article begins by identifying the insulting and cynical nature of the times, with the first item being a derogatory term for female marines. I'm sorry, but how the hell am I suppose to take this perspective seriously when ~40,000,000-72,000,000 people died, mostly men, and the author leads in with how female marines had a derogatory nickname (BAMS, Broad Ass Marines)? A…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 11:08 AM
2

Acts of extreme loyalty, honor, or love usually choke me up. I can remember watching Up with the girl I was dating at the time, and the opening scene went straight through the heart of me. I held it back as best I could, but failed, then shed a few tears. Upon being noticed, I gave a swift Sieg Heil. She then proceeded to question why I was crying a bit, to which I responded, "I just saluted Hitler for no apparent reason, and you're still more curious about a few tears?" It was all said and done…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:57 AM
2

Ah, This makes way more sense. The video is way over the top. I wouldn't doubt its legitimacy if sufficient proof was provided, but I was struggling to envision a reality in which anyone would take this video as anything more than observational humor. If it's merely a Chinese crack at Japan, it makes a thousand times more sense.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:02 AM
1

No, but just as I'm not holding you accountable for everything feminists say and do, it's equally as unkind to hold me accountable for the way Zerbu worded a title. Also, I'm speaking with you, not Zerbu, and I think you'll find I haven't been dismissive at all. People are dismissive, it's going to happen, but I've found /r/mensrights is more tolerable and less dismissive in general, and I think this has to do with the fact that the movement's in its infancy. We'll begin seeing MRM soldiers in t…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:53 PM
15

To summarize: Japanese men were lecherous drunks. Japanese men are no longer lecherous drunks, but have become wimps because they rejected the institute of marriage and decided to remain single. This has forced women to become more bold and daring, and is entirely men's fault. Furthermore, Japanese men have unrealistic expectations of women due to their addiction to porn and video games. The poor women just can't keep up. The Japanese population is declining, so the government's going to begin r…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:40 PM
1

Then I think you've misunderstood me. I live and breath academia, and have seen entire fields of study pop up in the short time I've been able to observe things from the top. You object to the essentials not being vetted, and that's fair. What I'd like you to do is go find published research in peer reviewed conferences and journals that objectively dissect and openly criticize elements of any of the fields. You'll be hard pressed to find much - it's only now surfacing to the top, with the artic…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:03 PM
1

Sorry for the disconnect, the article's behind a paywall and I can get around it, but I don't think you can (unless you're a student and your uni has explicit access through your student ID). First, researchers are beginning to expose various thematic discontinuities in the research produced through "sensitive" topics, feminist sociology being one of them. Second, it is getting called into question. The questioning is hard to find, because academia is consistently a decade or two behind the time…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:49 PM
1

Despite your insistence that it hasn't happened, here. Listen, I think we're both talking to brick walls here, so I'm going to back off. I'm not trying to force you to believe what I believe, I'm merely trying to show that these feminist social sciences are soft, rooted loosely, and are going to be called into question more frequently, and more aggressively, over the next 10-20 years. I may be wrong, but my educated guess is that feminism is largely going to cripple under the weight of society's…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:18 PM
1

A reminder to all that when given absolute anonymity, most people press all the nuclear launch buttons at once, then release millions of feral Honey Badgers on unsuspecting nuns, elderly people, and anyone who looks like The Really Photogenic Guy. Just 'cause. For the LULZ. Also, pool's closed.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:07 PM
1

YOU WANNA GO DO KARATE IN THE GARAGE?!?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:56 PM
1

First, when given the ability to interpret observations and events then form conclusions that cannot be contained or falsified, you can argue just about anything you'd like. I'm not going to argue that sociology or psychology is wrong, however. My initial point remains; Semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit. Round up all the feminist sociologists and push through as much as you'd like as forcefully and quickly as you can, but at the end of the day you have to prove something or history…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:46 PM
10

please don't be true, please let this be exagerated, please let the title be wildly off and unnecessarily sensationalized To avoid counting civilian deaths, Obama re-defined "militant" to mean "all military-age males in a strike zone" BY GLENN GREENWALD God Damnit.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:25 PM
1

Damn, I can't, Corporate Synergy Break-Out Break-Through Break-In Be-You Session that day. Not that I'm sure of it, but you know how they schedule those things every Thursday. Corporate clockwork and all that.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:22 PM
1

Well damn, I was two comments away from challenging you to a duel.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:12 PM
2

It is entirely different, conceptually. There was substantial proof, significant evidence, that the sun does not, in fact, revolve around the earth. Thus a change occurred. It's not enough to simply say the sun doesn't revolve around the earth, you have to prove it. With social sciences, the proof is qualitative, subjective in nature. It's not enough to simply say that we've historically used a model of gender that's now being challenged, you have to prove it. The further we sink into this threa…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:05 PM
1

I don't believe it's enough to simply ignore it. It isn't enough to forcibly neglect some trait in hopes that the attached assumptions and biases eventually go away. Not to say that's what you're suggesting, but assuming women with children inherently know what's best for all children is but a single perspective. We should actively ignore the fact that she's a woman and discuss the significance of her words, but this response works poorly for men who want to share their perspective. Do we simply…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:01 PM
1

Indeed. I have a similar interpretation. I was merely ranting against what the article and website represent. My comment was directed specifically at women having our ear and knowing about children just because. It was directed specifically at how we assume, generally speaking, that she's going to have valid, intelligible points simply by being female and having children.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:26 PM
2

No, I'm using History as an example of the ridiculous nature of employing such an approach. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what subject you choose, we can't apply concepts and constructs that were recently invented to an entire field of study spanning several hundred years. Boy, that Ford Model T sure was top of the line, but let's compare it to a 2004 Mercedes Benz and see what we think! No, it doesn't work like that. You can't just remove the men, sprinkle in some women, and rewrite …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:38 PM
1

A very fair point, so let's put History in the place of Mathematics. Personally, that makes it more uncomfortable for me to think about.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:04 PM
1

You're attempting to pit legalized prostitution against PUA. You've staged both negatively because the goal isn't to facilitate genuine intellectual debate, the goal is to create comments that can be taken out of context, intentionally misconstrued, in yet another sad attempt to degrade the MRM. Sorry to slap your strategy in the face so quickly, I'm sure your dreams and aspirations are very beautiful things, but you have absolutely no understanding of this subreddit. For starters, brahscience. …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:33 PM
2

New account advocating PUA, how very interesting, how very clever. PUA stuff tells men to play around women to disarm their "bitch shields", use "negs" and play other mind games to get into their poons. Alright, listen. The least you could do is try not to sound like a woman pretending to be a man or a prepubescent boy. Poons? Seriously? Say it with me now, vaginas. Was that so hard? When in doubt, trolls give themselves away when employing fun-time words like poon and vah-jay-jay. Edit: Troll d…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:22 PM
9

I have shoes, but it does not make me fit to work for Nike. I have furniture, but it does not mean I can tell you how to make it. If I have children, then I'm biologically healthy and capable of procreating with another human being, but it does not make me an authority on having, or raising, children, successfully or otherwise. Not to suggest that the author, Kelley Powell, isn't a good author or doesn't have salient points, but this is her perspective we're discussing here, nothing more. I'm ge…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:16 PM
6

FTA: Few appear in favour of taking to the streets to start a new wave of feminist protest - change, it seems, needs to be more delicate than that. "There is a place for just being a lot more bolshy but there is also a case for us being subtle and influential and just changing opinions politely," says Leimon. And her advice? "Women need to build their confidence and go for it - and haul another woman up with them." For starters, we're going to see feminism reinvent itself again to deal with its …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:07 PM
8

Assuming all work and research has been conducted through the male perspective, then attempting to convince the masses that the science itself needs to be rewritten, or at least translated, to reflect the female perspective, is so ridiculously full of holes that I can't find enough footing to even begin the argument. We can boil it down to a single observation, though. Mathematics was also created largely by men, are we going to rewrite that next on nothing more that a conspiratorial notion of m…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:34 AM
6

I agree. The message was very tight, very well put together, and it felt as if she was speaking directly to me. I often listen to her talks in the background, but this one kept me glued to the screen for the entirety of the video. That said, can we get a professional videographer to help out with the cuts and edits? While the content and delivery were both fantastic, I found the cuts between takes jarring at times - visually, of course, but also with the random ups and downs in her tone of voice…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:23 AM
0

They very much do exist. Also, this is a very interesting perspective on the industry. Two decades? Are you sure? In what country? I'm not trying to be an ass, really, but I can yank a brogrammer out of his brogramming chair right now. It's not some rampant epidemic, but base level programmers who pop their colors as a matter of fact do exist in this industry. Programming is a lifestyle, sure, but projects can be compartmentalized and the easy stuff can be handed to a gaggle of brogrammers so th…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 11:39 PM
14

For the record, brogrammers are hired, they don't do the hiring. This entire argument is ridiculous. Brogrammers exist, but have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not women are hired. That said, I'm growing tired of equality consistently being interpreted to imply there must be as many women in your company or industry as there are men. It's so blatantly idiotic, and so easily exposed as such, that I'm surprised it's lasted as long as it has.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:27 AM
2

No matter what century we’re in, sexual harassment is an issue that is guaranteed to get the plaintiff a lot of nasty reprisals. The fact that Pao readily admits to sex with Nazre ups the ante on those reprisals – and how the defense will attack her in the courtroom. No, it's going to show that she formed a romantic or sexual relationship, possibly with the intention to use it against him. They can try to show this off as sexual empowerment, but it's more easily exposed as motive. Let’s be blunt…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:19 AM
1

Comment I left: I have a subset of privileges afforded to me that overlap significantly with your subset of privileges, and though some privileges may be wholly unique to me and people like me, there are also privileges wholly unique to you and people like you. As privilege is subjective, and contingent upon not only the person receiving the benefit of the privilege, but also the person perceiving the privilege and providing the benefit, it's nearly impossible to quantify the strengths, weakness…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:05 AM
1

I see this in action all the time when speaking with my employees. Men, more often than not in my experience, are more likely to self-handicap, and provide excuses and justifications for why something's not done, something's not done right, things aren't moving along, etc. I try to keep an eye out for such behavior so I can cut it off at the pass, and most times I'm successful and can make their job/life easier while getting what I was initially after as well. It's not that hard, really. "Look, …
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:45 AM
5

I enjoy these types of discussions because they remind me of the staggeringly high percentage of people still operating under falsehoods, myths, bullshit rhetoric, etc. I make it a point to contribute to the discussion, and I always walk away with a bucket of downvotes and a broken heart. Still, we must persist.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 05:59 AM
3

When I gave my power to other people, I felt powerless. When they abused the power I gave them, I felt powerless. When they didn't instinctively know to give my power back to me - as is the humane thing to do, I felt powerless. When I demanded my power back and was met with hostility, resentment, and sometimes violence, I felt powerless. When I stopped giving my power to other people, I no longer felt powerless. There's a difference between victim blaming and responsibility. We could all benefit…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:48 PM
2

"[...] despite their inherent afflictions [...]" aaaaaaaand close window.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:39 PM
2

Polo. A car you can trust; or Polo. Safe enough for your child. Ah, I can see that a hell of a lot more clearly. I think this perspective is the most accurate one.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:24 PM
1

Drinking bleach, most likely. drum, drum, cymbal
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:02 AM
1

But we banned viperz. Ah ha! I didn't know this. I must have fallen asleep at the wheel again. I'd suggest we change our perspective on linking to other threads, honestly. Currently, it's frowned upon to link to some comment or conversation as doing so is often viewed, and rightfully so, as requesting a mensrights downvote brigade. Given this atmosphere, I think we're all are a bit hesitant to point people like viperz out when caught vilifying /r/mensrights with half-truths and outright lies. I …
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:09 AM
2

I'm not defending this woman, nor am I defending women who kill their children, but do understand that infanticide and filicide are real things. Explaining her behavior as radical, yet understandable, maternal filicide is akin to murdering a room full of people then claiming temporary insanity. The issue here is powerful, so look past the woman who killed her children, and understand how people are using unfalsifiable afflictions to their advantage. At the end of the day, we can't just up and mu…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:49 PM
2

other than from a known troll such as viperz These comments are indeed rare, consistently downvoted, trolls are exposed as effectively as possible, but viperz is an excellent example of that to which I refer. I can't remember off the top of my head when the last viperz instance occurred, but I do remember the massive influx of new people coming here all held firmly under the assumption that /r/mensrights was a bunch of rape apologists. I get what you're saying when you state, "I've never seen a …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:05 PM
2

Indeed, I do the same. I'm actually grateful for the slow trickle of content here, as my boredom forces me to shift to the new tab once I've burned through all the top/controversial content.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:53 PM
2

Everything else aside, you don't have to worry about that here. We may disagree with you, there may be active debate, we may all take something away from our conversation - we may not. But we're not going to stalk you. I can't speak for everyone of course, but we generally don't support horsecockery and downvote brigades. Keep telling us what you think. Keep disagreeing with us. Stick around. It's precisely what we're trying to do, and while you may sense a great deal of hostility in this thread…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:31 PM
2

I've noticed this as well, and I'm glad the majority of the time troll comments are rightfully downvoted by the community. However, people don't realize that our adversaries only need a handful of instances to tear us apart publicly. We see it all the time with all these anti-MRM bloggers attempting to discredit /r/MensRights. All they need is a single example of, "I think men should be allowed to rape women, it's only natural [34 upvotes, 10 downvotes]," and bam, thousands of people now believe…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:04 PM
4

If only I had the time to give enough of a fuck to check all their pathetic subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:01 PM
3

What's really annoying is that comments that were doing well are downvoted to appear mediocre or downright unpopular. Here's an example, one of my comments. It had roughly the same number of upvotes a few days ago - now it magically has the equivalent number of downvotes. While karma doesn't matter - the visibility of MRA created/supported content does. Post examples if you have any. People need to understand that "lots of trolls" translates into something meaningful here. People need to see and…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:56 PM
2

This is sexist garbage hinged entirely on biased, spiteful generalizations and observations. It also has fuck all to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:13 AM
0

Absolutely amazing commercial, but... "Small but tough" Not the best choice of words. Sure, the daughter could be, "small but tough," but the commercial was about the father's perspective. Don't get me wrong here, I'm not trying to say, "COOL COMMERCIAL BUT THE END IS SEXIST," I'm just trying to figure out why they used those words specifically at the end of the commercial, aside from the obvious explanation of the car being small and supposedly tough.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:10 AM
2

Page 10: Justification for Intelligent Design. Yep. That's about right. Nothing to see here folks, move along.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:48 AM
1

Alma mater. Represent. Franklin's Psych Department is damn good at what they do. Also, to give everyone a better idea as to why this is important - UGA is one of the top party schools in the US. We have about a hundred bars within a half mile radius directly across the street from north campus. Binge drinking is big here, and we're actively combating against it. Not that understanding this factoid is essential to understanding the research, but it may help better understand the emphasis on binge…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:36 AM
8

Alright, so, this is a bit confusing for me. I see it all over Reddit, not just here. Reality Group: Hello people on the street, look at this image insulting men! Random Person: Oh wow. Hey, men, come take a look at this, it's about you. Men: looks at image - Hm, I don't agree with how men are being depicted in your image, and I'd like to explain why. Group: Oh, sorry, sure, lets talk. Reddit trollxchromosomes: Hello people in this publicly accessibly forum, look at this image insulting men! MRA…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:32 AM
1

Yes, but the abstracted truth is far more simple, consolidated as: Society: Here, have some power. Oh, wait, that's too much, could you give some of it back please? People with too much power: LOL
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:17 AM
-1

I'm not going to be satisfied until we quit with the whole, "women are always brilliant," bullshit. This conversation can't move forward until: 1) We collectively acknowledge that men are made out to be bumbling morons in damn near everything on TV, and that this is wrong. or 2) They release a commercial where the man is like, "I sure do enjoy being brilliant in everything I do," and the woman is like, "I'M SO FAT AND STUPID I'M SO GLAD YOU'RE BRILLIANT, AND OF THE SUPERIOR SEX." 2 will never oc…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:32 AM
17

I have such wonderful conversations with educated people. Whether they hold a PhD in sociology, pharmacology, astrophysics, political science - they're always interesting conversations and debates. Then I post something on Reddit or Facebook or whatever, and I'm reminded of a very simple truth: Stupid people have computers too.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:46 AM
1

I've always found these articles both lacking and telling. Lacking, because I don't care about more <insert whatever> being hired. I'd like to know how hiring more of <insert whatever> has influenced the company as well as their respective industry. Telling, because of the sheer lack of content. Honestly, every last one of the articles does nothing more than pull from the following grab bag, ("women", "CEO", "jobs", "more", "highly qualified"). Honestly, the war's over. The wage gap's dead, or v…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:55 AM
1

It's my belief that links such as these unintentionally lead to thread raids. I also believe that people view the comments here before visiting the OP's link to see if anyone's summarized the conversation or provided sufficient reasoning to ignore or consider the link in question. That said, I'd like for everyone to consider the following points before heading over to the AskReddit thread and jumping into the fray. There are a lot of people downplaying the significance of false accusations in th…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:13 AM
2

Defacement is a form of vandalism. Vandalism does not necessarily require the outright destruction or damage of property. Also, she admitted to defacing a car used primarily for work. If the car is owned by your company, let them know, so they can bring criminal mischief/defacement charges against her. Be careful in doing so, though, as they may turn around and use it against you - such as write you up or fire you for not taking care of their property. It sucks, but it does happen.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:37 AM
6

From a linguistics perspective, such generic terminology doesn't really say much of anything. if, "Why do women make 75% of what men make," popped up, then I'd be a bit more curious. The only observation I'd make here is that women are more likely to search for reasons behind male infidelity, not that women are more suspicious than men - or anything along those lines - really.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:46 AM
-1

Don't be offended, that's the exact opposite of what we're all trying to accomplish here. Professionalism is one thing, and if they're doing it in front of clients, or saying things you genuinely find offensive, then let them know. Otherwise, insert yourself into the conversation. Tell them if something they're suggesting may be a turn on for them but turns guys completely off. Just talk, you'll be surprised how receptive they may be. If they're doing it just to piss the guys off, this will show…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:41 AM
1

Ah, while I disagree with such nonsense, I can at least see the point now. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:41 AM
2

Ah, good catch - I meant to say, "series of obvious logical progressions," or, "series of truths presented with motive/agenda." He wouldn't be lying per se, so I certainly didn't mean to suggest he'd be presenting a series of lies. I was suggesting that he'd be presenting information solely to lead them to a specific conclusion, and that this can be both good and bad. Bad, because people don't like being pushed in any given direction, people don't like having their minds made up for them, and th…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:28 AM
1

I don't understand what you mean... You stated that this had nothing to do with title IX and that the ruling was brought by an independent body. I pointed out that USASF brought the ruling, and that they agreed to satisfy all title IX requirements back in 2010. You now state that one sport isn't another, and that there are special rules, or something? I genuinely don't follow. I think it's pretty clear that if USASF enforced a rule that is demonstrably sexist, which they did, and if USASF agreed…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:49 PM
0

I will copy this and PM you if I have any questions, but please delete this immediately. If we're going to argue, then we'll argue, but having this info publicly available will do you no good.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:25 PM
0

I was requiring user names so we could contact users if there was any question of tampering and make sure they actually took the survey. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You want the usernames in case people start hacking other people's accounts? Did you expect that everyone on /r/mensrights would have their accounts hacked? And what precisely did you expect to do if you were presented with someone who both hacked someone's account then openly admitted it to you (note: highly unlikely)…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:21 PM
-1

Understandable. Let's say everyone's raiding the feminism subreddits and we're trying to drag it down from the inside by polluting the posts and comments. Well, make a new account, then start agreeing with everything they say so you fit in. Then gather intel and start posting things that would turn other people away from, or give them a false impression of, the subreddit (example: viperz). If you're just new, then welcome to the war. If you're genuine and genuinely interested in having this surv…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:12 PM
2

Thank you, but I doubt I will ever understand people who don't empathize with others and treat them as human beings. At this point much of gender politics is insanity to me. Motive and perspective. If you had to kill to feed your starving family, does that make you less of a human being? It's not always that black and white, but understanding a person's motives and perspectives will show you that even in our most heinous, villainous acts, we're usually looking out for another human being. There …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:02 PM
3

The first, and most important, aspect of your proposal is the tractability, accountability, and utilization of the donations. If you're talking about a quarter of a million, I'll be the first say that skimming off $10k would be easy as hell, especially in this atmosphere. All others details are completely irrelevant until the cash flow is utterly and entirely transparent. Then you should move on to the voting process so everyone's aware that by giving $25, they're buying themselves a vote to det…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:56 PM
0

No, this is about protecting other people from falling into a trap. I will skip it, thank you, and your comment history is two months old and has nothing but great things to say about your support of the MRM. I pointed this out earlier - how SRS started infiltrating /r/mensrights around the time you created this account - so it wouldn't surprise me if this is simply a way to extract information from the MRAs here to later use against them, or to sell to some feminist journalist begging for demog…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:48 PM
0

Then would you please provide your list of the SRS usernames used in your filtering process? The possible sensitive nature of using sign-ons is why I don't have the results displayed at the end. I'll take screen shots in a few days and post the results like that. This makes absolutely zero sense. My grandmother can hop on her laptop and click a link to view your results. It has absolutely nothing to do with the "sensitive nature of using sign-ons". Regardless of whether I'm logged in or logged o…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:43 PM
1

When debating, pandering to the inherent compassion of other individuals doesn't always work out. In order to use compassion as an entry point, you and the other person must openly admit, or at least show, obvious signs of compassion. You're logically correct, but what we're discussing here is that you'll be shot down before you reach the end of your second paragraph. What we're discussing here is that inserting "rape is bad, all victims deserve help," leads directly to, "and some victims are me…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:33 PM
1

You're attempting to make slow persuasion, or the slippery slope, work to your advantage. It's an interesting approach, but it's neither novel nor unique. I'm sorry if this comes off as me outright disagreeing with you or smacking you around, I'm truly sorry, as I do agree with what you're trying to accomplish and am not attempting to berate you or your efforts. I would like to point out, simply and honestly, that slow persuasion pisses people off. You're leaving breadcrumbs, leading people to a…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:25 PM
2

No, absolutely not. Screen shots are easily manipulated. Information can be altered or removed entirely. Have a transparent process that doesn't jeopardize or hold liable any person here, based on username, or scrap this study. I'm sorry for being so aggressive, but I know how this kind of stuff works, and I will not, absolutely will not, let up until this process is cleaned up, and those frequenting /r/mensrights can be assured their usage behavior isn't being tracked. By requiring usernames, t…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:02 PM
1

This does not require specific information be pinned to reddit usernames. If you want a general understanding of the demographics, why require usernames at all? Having invested a great deal of time in usage behavior analysis, analytics, and statistical analysis, I can honestly say there's no good reason for you to require usernames, and there isn't a single data point you can't extract without people's usernames.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:57 PM
2

This has happened before, and I'm not entirely convinced, nor should anyone be entirely convinced, that this blatant canvassing of the subreddit is for the greater good. Your account is roughly two months old, and that's about the time the SRS starting aggressively infiltrating /r/mensrights. I'm not accusing you of being a double agent, but I am going to point out that it's suspicious for someone to come along, post nothing but agreeable comments and links in this, and neighboring, subreddits, …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:54 PM
22

In all honesty, I tried reading the article in hopes of understanding the situation, but it reads like a high school cheerleader's describing a cat fight between some of her friends. I'm not even kidding here. Please, go read this article. It genuinely reads like Sally's talking about Jessica and Veronica and how they're mean and stuff. It's...actually hilarious...in its own dark and twisted way.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:14 PM
10

Well hell! My best friend works out of Beaumont! I'll hop a flight to go drink with him every couple of months, but he'll be headed to Perth shortly so my Texas trips will be coming to an end as well. Regardless, if you find yourself in the southeast then PM me and we'll grab a beer. And I didn't assume you needed help with your relationship, no worries. I interpreted your comment just as you've described them.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:10 PM
17

As it turns out, beer and helping people are two of my most favorite things. I'm in the Greater Atlanta area, PM me if you ever find yourself 'round these parts.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:01 PM
20

Eh, I disagree. I've butted heads with some of the moderators, critiqued girlwriteswhat, openly disagreed with some of the veterans such as Alanna and Demonspawn... and even if I'm downvoted into oblivion, I at least know I was downvoted because I had the less favorable opinion, not because they called their friends in to downvote me. There's some jerking of the circles going on around here, sure. It happens everywhere. But people are passionate here, and I do often find myself debating openly w…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:58 PM
1

While it's good news to see women being arrested for assault, be sure to maintain an objective perspective. Nicole Houde, 26, who won the 2010 Miss New Hampshire USA crown, was charged with simple assault after allegedly punching, kicking, scratching and biting Scott Nickerson, 33, of Manchester, on Wednesday, police Lt. Michael Hurley said. Objectively, this is still ridiculous. If I slap a woman in public, I'm going to jail. Plain and simple. If I punch and kick and scratch and bite a woman in…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:39 PM
65

Indeed, but be careful with the judgments and generalizations. We're all a bit small minded from time to time, no one's perfect, and there are deeply-seated, staggeringly pervasive social constructs at work here. That's why I suggested you prepare for those one-on-ones with people from within that group of 30. We're simple creatures, we anger easily, we tend to believe whatever they pushed into our heads when we were growing up, but we are a curious and intelligent lot when it comes right down t…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:31 PM
48

These situations are remarkably awkward, and difficult to explain. I can empathize deeply with you on this one. I once scolded a woman who was verbally abusing her boyfriend in public. The boyfriend's friend told me to back off. I wasn't mad, I was shocked. My mind reeled with potential explanations - maybe he knew this is how they were and the boyfriend told his friend to not let people interfere? Maybe the girl was violent and he was helping me? Nothing made sense, except that I was the only m…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:24 PM
327

You now have 30 fewer problems in your life. File this under "success" and move on. You responded honestly, then they reacted. What you should take away from this situation has nothing to do with gender, it has to do with common sense and decency. We all get mad, but if we're decent, compassionate human beings then we'll wait until we've calmed down before responding. Those who aren't react immediately. This is the easy part. The hard part comes when people from that group of 30 approach you on …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:17 PM
31

Granted, but I think we're all a bit tired of having to wade through bullshit in hopes of finding, or taking part in, genuine conversation. It's getting progressively worse as well. I'm getting to the point that I'd rather just conference call with all you fools because I'm starved for honest debate, and worn out from all this troll combat.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:08 PM
1

USASF pledged to satisfy all Title IX requirements back in 2010. In general, it promotes gender equality in collegiate sports, plain and simple. I think this has everything to do with fairness between boys and girls, as the USASF created, included, and enforced a rule that applies to males but not females.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:04 PM
2

Imagine, for a moment, /r/letsshakeourfistatwomentogether. Picture it in your head. All of us, defiantly, silently, simultaneously shaking our fists at women as they pass by. Women don't know if we're cheering them on, telling them to get off our lawn, or expressing our hatred of their collective gender by slightly raising our clenched fists. Well, I'm sure as hell laughing.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:55 PM
1

My thoughts exactly. I'm often so engrossed in my discussions that these types of comments catch me off guard and I forgot there's a sizable number of angst-ridden college age redditors 'round these parts. At first I become a bit more defensive than I should because I think I'm having a conversation with an adult who's genuinely pointing out some flaw in my logic or glaring character defect. In this chase, hubris. Then I check their comment history and smack myself on the forehead for quarreling…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:49 PM
3

No, I'm saying that in discussing potential research it isn't uncouth to state, or suggest, that I'm a doctor. Does it really bother you that I sometimes refer to my credentials in passing? Are you that concerned about me saying: Don't mind the blathering doctor. Honestly, I went back about 20 comments and that is the only time I ever specifically refer to myself as a doctor.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:17 PM
4

No, it's not just a nickname, and I suppose I'm just as clumsy about "wedging" my credentials into a conversation as a mechanic is when "wedging" the fact that they're qualified to fix your car when you take it to the shop. I'd understand your tone if I started every comment with, "I'M A DOCTOR SO YOU HAVE TO LISTEN TO ME." But I don't, so I suppose haters are unquestionably going to hate, as they say.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:42 PM
1

My major professor taught me a neat little trick when I was having a bit of trouble with our IRB people slacking off and needlessly sitting on our request for no good reason. We typically select a target conference or journal before or during research, as we logically, and obviously, need to publish said research. When submitting paperwork you should...well, how should I say this...not pay so much attention to the dates of that conference or journal. If the target pub is stated to be 5 months ou…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 02:13 PM
1

There's a difference between the rhetoric you've outlined, and the reality and case law used when determining legal recourse. Not that I don't fully understand and sympathize with what you've written and how you feel, I'm simply saying that, "but everywhere is a male space," won't hold up in court. Title IX is already under heavy scrutiny, and it's only a matter of time before the damn thing gets dropped or rewritten. While feminists rely on such rhetoric to pad their own arguments, precedence i…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 01:57 PM
2

I just wanted you to know, researcher to researcher, that I died a little on the inside when you mentioned IRB approval. 9/10, it's just some additional paperwork, but whenever you want to do anything meaningful, such as the proposed experiment, they're an absolute pain in the ass. For those who aren't familiar, everyone is required to obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval before conducting research that directly involves humans. Given we wouldn't be collecting information directly fr…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 01:42 PM
2

Why assume one must be unhappy in order to complain? Scientific research makes me extremely happy. There are very few things I enjoy more than burying myself waist deep in white papers and working 20 hours a day for three months straight to prove a single point. I'm essentially complaining. I'm saying that something exists and it could be better, but I'm happy in doing so. We don't come here to thoughtlessly gripe because we're mad at the wife, we come here because we sense something is wrong wi…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:05 AM
3

I'm going to sit back and enjoy my popcorn on this one, and you should too. Here, come and join me on the couch, let's eat some popcorn together. Let's watch our society insist that if there's an all male space without an all female space equivalent, then the all male space must be removed out of fairness and equality (Title IX). Now, here's where you get angry and start to get up from the couch, but hold on friend! Wait! Sit down, it'll be worth it, I promise! Let's then watch these very same p…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:55 AM
4

Indeed, so allow me to meet each point correlated with my own: Father's day has become more about the mother than it's ever been about the father, and women have mother's day to boot, so having a women's day adds insult to injury. Men have to sign up for the draft at 18, thus women's shelters aren't really the problem, because male soldiers with PTSD have nowhere to go once they come home. Men are forced to work out or otherwise alter their appearances as well as their careers and financial stat…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:39 AM
13

We have our own axiom here, which we could all benefit from understanding and avoiding. "Men don't have <x> and/or have <x> bad/worse, so women having <x> or having <x> bad/worse isn't the issue." While I believe ours isn't as pervasive or obnoxiously tangential as theirs, it still happens, and it should be equally as absurd, and ultimately avoided. Example: when arguing with others about the nonsensical 1-in-4 women are raped in their lifetimes, the counterargument should consist of evidence fa…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:15 AM
2

You're referring to a post where I facilitated scientific and philosophical debate. I was sad to see it do so poorly, but sometimes the SRS downvote brigades ruin all the fun because they've nothing better to do. I consider this a compliment, though. I've no recollection of you, and from our conversation I'm not surprised by this fact, but I seemed to have made a lasting impression on you with that post. I doubt you meant to spill the beans here, but thanks for inadvertently saying, "I know who …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:39 AM
3

You absolutely could, but in reality we use evidence to verify or support our claims. You can say the same of my posts, but have no evidence to support your claim, thus you're merely flailing about mindlessly because people are rightfully calling you out on your idiotic nonsense. I can say that of your posts, because you're clearly a child, and any impartial third party would agree merely by reading your comments.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:17 AM
5

As a counterargument it's absolute shit, because it's hinged on assuming you have an exact understanding of my perceptions. If we're going to play that game, then fine, my turn. You only have a Reddit account because you're an absolute bore in reality, and have no merit, courage, honor, or decency to speak of.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:06 AM
4

When playing devil's advocate, the counterargument must be somewhat logical and reasonable. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, but you're clearing flagging yourself as a troll. You guys can't do anything right.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:41 AM
16

Maybe it's just my scientist brain doing scientist things, but here's what I'd like to do: Select a variety of objects that can be easily broken or stolen. That TV is hard to steal, and people would think twice about kicking it because it's expensive. Put "My boyfriend cheated..." and "My girlfriend cheat..." on these items and place them in locations where it'd be easy to get away with theft/vandalism On each of the items, put small "if found, please return to..." stickers, make sure they're no…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:39 AM
1

Oh, absolutely. We don't have any children, my mistake for not clarifying in my comment, but I've no doubt we'll tighten up the assumptions when genuine mini-mes are involved.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:29 PM
4

I was merely emphasizing the motives of the founder of AshleyMadison.com, and how he's trying to increase the female memberships by having falsehoods published. Specifically, he's creating a dialogue, without presenting any evidence or opening up his books, where we assume women look into cheating after mother's day. The reason this is more offensive for women is because he's strategically pandering to women, with false information, in hopes of increasing the demographic in his own books thus gi…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 10:45 AM
6

My SO and I have had this conversation several, several times before. As pathetic as it is, we always agree that while it'd be harder for our girls to understand while they're in school, sending the girls to public school and the boys to private school ensures everyone receives a quality education. For those puzzled by the conclusion, it's because girls are given preferential treatment in public schools, and we'll have to pay the private school premium in order for our boys to receive similar tr…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:16 AM
2

4) Remember to thank everyone for their help and delete your comments.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:39 AM
1

No no, that's not what should piss you off. Here, let me tell you what you need to be pissed off about. Remember when your family wasn't on Facebook and it was just you and your friends and other highschool/college kids, then they opened it up and let everyone create a Facebook account and your crazy Aunt started posted these images? Yeah? Notice all the "my mom found my Reddit name" posts lately? It's only a matter of time...
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:04 AM
3

To begin, please be careful with intentional or unintentional calls to arms, as simplecosine's comment suggests. In response to the image, we're going to continue to see a rise in Men's Rights. We are responsible for increasing the visibility of the movement, and we are responsible for making sure it doesn't make mistakes similar to those of Feminism post 1980. That said, we're doing a pretty damn good job, but we can't quit or get lazy just yet. We had genuine male perspectives on CNN the other…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:58 PM
12

This is surprisingly more offensive for women than it is for men. You're letting the president of a company charged with promoting infidelity tell you what you feel. He's basically taking a holiday that has nothing to do with spousal appreciation and making it about spousal appreciation. He's just planting seeds. If you're a woman reading this article and saying, "huh?" Congratulations. You're just as confused as we are.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:53 PM
6

When left unchecked, truth can be exaggerated and even misleading. When left unchecked, lies can become slides in PowerPoint presentations viewed in courses around the world.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:47 PM
22

Meanwhile if a girl was kicked off a football team, history dictates that the football team would come under scrutiny nation-wide and would ultimately be dissolved due to threats from the federal government to revoke funding to the school. FTFY.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 08:06 PM
24

They are indeed really stupid. We don't condone rape or hate on women here, we simply discuss and promote equal rights for men and never, I repeat never, advocate that women should have fewer, or weaker, rights than men. What we do here is ask you questions like: why do you assume viperz is a man and not a woman? We're not going to judge you on your answer, we're going to discuss it honestly and openly. That, in a nutshell, is what /r/mensrights is about.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 12:30 AM
5

Not to put words in your mouth, but I think what you're trying to say is that if marriage is of the utmost important to an individual, they're responsible for bringing it up at a time they believe fitting and appropriate. In your case, I think it would be your responsibility to say you don't want to fuck around and not get married, and that you're in the relationship because you want to get married. It would then be his responsibility to be honest and tell you whether or not he feels the same. W…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:44 PM
2

While I agree with your sentiment, I disagree with the notion that time was essentially wasted. Marriage isn't always the first thing to come up, people tend to just date for a while to see if they even like the person. Maybe they're just dating to date, and while they'd like to get married - they'd rather just be with someone and that someone happens to be you. It's a matter of style in the end I suppose, so I don't mean to be pedantic here, but I do generally disagree with the notion of whippi…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:03 PM
14

I'm not trying to speak for you, so I apologize in advance if my words read that way. I'm in a similar situation, and I think it should be stated very clearly that the relationship didn't begin with both people understanding and accepting the fact that marriage is outdated. It takes time and patience to convince anyone of anything that goes against their upbringing and core beliefs. Women are, generally speaking, hypnotized by the concept of marriage. I don't give a damn what Cosmo or Feminism h…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:24 PM
16

I love TED talks, and have spent many a procrastinating afternoon listening to them. However, there are some things you should know about TED to put things into perspective. Having a TED talk is partly having something to say, partly having the money to pay to become a member. The membership can be thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. You can nominate yourself as a speaker. You only need one nomination to be considered. They explicitly state that sponsoring does not ensure a speaking slot.…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:42 PM
0

Well isn't this an itch.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:05 PM
6

Since no one else has pointed this out: Part of the SRS/anti-mensrights strategy is to post sensational or nonsensical bullshit in /r/mensrights This is a sensational and nonsensical post, bringing together a director's random quote taken out of context, a movie, and a television series - all of which have absolutely nothing in common. OP account is two days old. The people who hate us can't find genuine evidence to use against us, so they're starting to create the evidence themselves. The OP ha…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:57 AM
1

It also reminds me of Umbrella insurance.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:04 PM
7

The article's title was bait, the article itself wasn't as bad as it could have been. Biased, but not feminist propaganda. Her next article will have another sensational title, she's already attracting her audience. The content will be equally as biased, but lack any genuine bark or bite. She's a decent writer, she knows how to please lots of audiences at once, and she's doing an excellent job pulling people in to read her work. She's taking advantage of this situation, and good for her, because…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:56 PM
2

For those sitting on the fence, who find themselves sympathizing with the female in the comic: The MRM does not detract from genuine charitable efforts for the sole purpose of drawing attention to our own issues concerning rape, such as the effects of false rape accusations, the significance of condoning or outright ignoring these effects, and the definition of rape that, while recently adjusted for the better, is still defined as an act committed by men that affects men, barely, and women, larg…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:34 AM
1

Very interesting, thanks for pointing this out.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:07 AM
7

Her adherence to feminist safe words and overemphasis on anything related to men's rights leads me to believe this is a sarcastic response to GWW and men's rights in general. Part of her proposal, for example, is to remove children from public schools, avoid anything that isn't a "hard" science, and read Atlas Shrugged. Even the way she says "Keep ... rebelling" with a smirk at the end has me wondering whether or not she's just another feminist taking a sarcastic jab at the MRM. Maybe this is ge…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:02 AM
1

I was under the impression that "tipping out" was fairly common, where waitresses will actually give part of their tips to the chefs. Also, waitresses can make a hell of a lot of money off of tips while the cook is only making $7/hr, but sometimes waitresses only make $10-20/day while the cooks still made $7/hr. I wouldn't say tips are where the real money's made, but they do stand to make more than everyone else on really good days.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:06 AM
3

Yes, there's evidence that attractiveness divides the positions here, and that more attractive men will be allowed to serve but that unattractive men and unattractive women will cook, bus, or not be hired at all. It's not so much a gender thing as it is an attractiveness thing, but men are less likely to be the attractive individual here, probabilistically speaking, as people in general tend to favor a pretty young women as opposed to average looking men when it comes to serving food. The enviro…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:44 PM
-2

What I'd do is scan SRS all/top/new for links to, or about, /r/MensRights, pick up all the users who commented in these threads, and check each users comment history for buzzwords or phrases. Stalking individuals isn't allowed, but this is essentially a glorified search. Doing so could scan tens of thousands of comments in a minute (depending on your connection, as it would rely on JSON requests), and running it once a day would be an easy way to create a digest on potential trash talking trolls…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:30 PM
2

In the end, the people who are susceptible to listening to that crap are the people who already hold those misconceptions about r/MR. This was my conclusion as well. People aren't going to think, "Oh, so that's what Men's Rights is all about, legalizing rape, now I know!" - They're going to dismiss the insanity outright, or head over to /r/MensRights to check for themselves. Those that do believe it already believed it and thus can't be helped. Not easily, anyways.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:23 PM
-1

It's ironic that the comment you've referred to contains the exact strategy for defeating a troll. Homeless people are ignored because people find them annoying and subhuman. They shake their change cans and ask for money, and sometimes people will help them out. But no one stops and asks if they're free Thursday night to babysit the kids. No one stops to entertain genuine political debate. No one asks for their business card. There are various ways for a homeless person to get cleaned up. Find …
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:16 PM
3

Not to be pedantic, and I agree that this is closer to the mark, but it should be stated that both the quality and duration of health care contribute heavily to the difference in average life span. The per capita data is skewed because a lot of men don't get healthcare as often or as early as women. Hell, I bought insurance for my lady way before myself - and not because we can't afford it, but because I have more experience doing the bullshit insurance tango than she, and wanted to ensure she w…
/r/MensRights21/04/12 10:50 AM
-1

It's not even hacking. All one has to do is download programs that systematically check various big name CMSs/CRMs for known vulnerabilities. If you happen to be using Joomla 1.5 with no patches or updates and someone comes along and uses one of these programs on your site, they'd have everything they needed to do some vicious shit. It'd take roughly 10 minutes to Little Bobby Tables any given site, if I was a terrible jack ass. A hole in the security, some bullshit PHP vulnerability, a spot in …
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:04 PM
1

The point is, it detracts from the significance of the primary issue. How much time have we spent talking about decreased levels of pleasure, and how much time have we spent talking about why cutting a baby's dick up is inherently wrong, morally reprehensible? I'm not saying that's what you were after - absolutely not. I'm rather enjoying our conversation! I'm saying people in general, especially the media, will jump on the pleasure thing, and in doing so quickly defeat any argument against circ…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 09:53 PM
1

Back in grad school, I had a colleague who pen tested various conferences by submitting papers that basically amounted to ten pages of scientifically worded Lorem Ipsum. The results weren't all that surprising, but it did give us a clear indication as to which conferences properly peer-reviewed their submissions. The conferences that claimed to peer-review, but weren't all that great, accepted the paper - while the more significant journals and conferences (IEEE, ACM, etc.) rejected the paper ou…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 09:19 PM
1

Now, here's my main question: how big does that minority have to be for the loss of sensation to be worth worrying about when justifying infant circumcision? 0 people large, because being against circumcision was never about pleasure. Being against circumcision is about not carving up a baby's genitals regardless of their gender. The fact that some men may or may not have a decreased level of pleasure later in life is utterly and entirely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:56 PM
1

Tell me what you know and what your experience is professionally and academically, and that will allow me to provide you with better information. PM me if need be. Edit: cites are almost always publicly available, and can be found either on the publisher's website, or through scholar.google.com. Google will tell you within the search results, but always check the journal publication or conference release to be sure.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:30 PM
1

Start here to get an idea as to how this process works. Once you understand what qualifies as strict, and loose, peer review, you'll be able to look at the journals and conferences such that you can distinguish between proper peer review and bullshit peer review. Here's an example of abysmal peer review. Why yes, by submitting a paper you too can determine the quality of your own research! Granted, the latter example is extremely exaggerated, although I'm sad to say it does exist in our shared r…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:15 PM
-3

Well, get this whole bravado public shaming thing over with, because I'm done here. if you need to publicly humiliate me because I've bruised your ego, then fine, I can take it, and I've been through worse. So just get it out kid, it's alright. Once you've calmed down, PM me, because I can teach you how to do things correctly. If you need to throw more bullshit at me to save your "rep" or whatever it's called, go right ahead. It genuinely doesn't bother me.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:41 PM
1

Qualitative and quantitative evidence can serve as existing or supporting evidence. I can theorize on the quantitative analysis of favorable ice cream flavors based on Ben and Jerry's financial records, inducing from the evidence that chocolate is more favorable than vanilla. I can theorize on the qualitative analysis of favorable ice cream flavors based on surveys conducted at a statistically significant number of Ben and Jerry's locations, deducing from the evidence that vanilla of more favora…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:14 PM
3

To date, the most effective argument I have is simultaneously physical and verbal. I explain to those I'm trying to convince that equality has existed as a slowly swinging pendulum, and I swing my arm back and forth. I explain how feminism fought for the rights of women everywhere, so that women could be equal to men, so that we could maintain traditional roles without having them influence external or sociological obligations, and I swing my arm back back from whence it came. I explain how Men'…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:36 PM
1

You're skipping over a few points because you're trying to find evidence that supports your conclusion. The people rate their pain based on some predefined scale. This is important to understand. They may feel as if they're experiencing pain at a 27, but they're only provided with a 1-10 scale. They are forced, by the metric and methodology, to adapt their pain to fit the constraints of the scale. They choose 8 because it's between 1 and 10, but that does not imply their 8 is every ones 8. This …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:20 PM
-2

It was meant as a simplistic example, as I know others are reading and probably don't understand, thus I'm trying to explain in laymen's terms as we go along. Yes, you are being condescending. To assume, after everything I've written, after all the explanations I've given, that I'm no more capable than an entry level stats student based on nothing more than a ballpark assumption of how I described a particular concept, is disappointing. (it's like ten lines in matlab) That's not programming. The…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:57 PM
1

Personal experience should not be dismissed outright based on its subjective nature. However, how do you propose factoring subjective evidence into drug targeting procedures? For example, you're charged with adapting the chemical composition of Oxycontin, a narcotic pain reliever that is known to be as potent as it is addictive. You cannot, absolutely cannot, modify the drug and test it on humans in order to gauge the effectiveness of the drug based on their responses. People will die, your care…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:50 PM
1

rolls up sleaves I challenge you to a math off, sir. But seriously, I've done similar studies - I've a heavy background in statistical analysis, and could probably code a Bayesian filter and a Monte Carlo simulation in my sleep. Let me brush my shoulders off, as the kids these days might say. The issue here is that I'm not discussing yes/no answers, and am not assuming a strict mathematical model. We can't assume we know, or are close, to how people will answer when given sufficiently complex qu…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:15 PM
1

You know, maybe I'm just too sympathetic, but I never was a fan of misdirection via tangential arguments. I know it works, but I always feel bad afterwards because it's as if I was shaking a toy in front of a puppy then pretended to throw it just to see them chase after nothing and come back upset, confused, and disappointed. It's genuinely easy to derail the majority of the feminists that argue here, but it's so easy that I find it to be a cheap trick. They just talk in circles for hours, and I…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:57 PM
1

You make a good point, but I'm not suggesting we avoid anecdotal evidence altogether. I see this crop up a lot, and you and Ma99ie are making the same mistake here, and it's the assumption that we must adhere to academic research when searching for some truth or speaking of some truth. That's not what I'm suggesting. Qualitative evidence has its place here and isn't rejected outright, and anecdotal evidence - being a form of subjective, qualitative evidence - serves its purpose well. Knowing whe…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:43 PM
1

Let's start with a better question. If I prick you with a needle, how much does it hurt? There is no way to measure ambiguous concepts. There is no way to measure pleasure, pain, hate, love, greed, envy, whatever. We can say that pricking your finger activated 3.2% more nociceptors in your body when compared to those activated in mine, but pain is far more than the percentage of activated pain receptors. The stimuli trigger a series of actions that work your nervous system like a billion roller …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:37 PM
5

I'm not arguing to adapt our techniques to better meet the needs of our adversaries, I'm arguing that we should approach research more carefully, treat our own ideas more scientifically, and have a general process for vetting information we allow into our heads. You're being far too cynical and paranoid with the rest of your comment. The shelves may not be overflowing with scholarly research speaking against feminism, but it's not ignored outright. There's plenty of research taking feminism to t…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:26 PM
1

I would argue that 1% is barely enough to ensure a high confidence interval with an acceptable margin of error. When we're talking about the wage gap, a good-enough confidence interval with a wider than usual margin of error could make all the difference in the world, and it's the first thing I'd question. In the study from the other thread I initially pointed out, they ignore evidence if it doesn't meet their own subjective criteria, and their margin of error is laughably high. The ones that we…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:18 PM
1

It's also worth pointing out that research is written and reviewed by humans, and we sometimes overlook things. It may be nothing more than a couple of numbers that don't match up, but one should always question why they don't match up. The vast majority of the time it's because someone didn't update their damn .tex files before compiling, but if they published incorrect information then there's a chance they used incorrect information and should be notified so that they can submit errata if the…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:06 PM
1

Indeed, which is why I began by stating that there's nothing more difficult than arguing with a feminist who has a bit of research in their hands. I've found it impossible to argue that the research is faulty. Even when I dig through the white paper, come back, and state in no uncertain terms how and why the research is faulty. To the ignorant, research=fact, automatically and inherently. If anything, this is a great way to determine if your arguing with a brick wall.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:24 PM
-1

Good catch! You're absolutely right, I meant quantitative in the last line. The issue with random sampling, all other biases aside, is that a sufficiently large population hinders outlier elimination and clustering around healthy representatives it's a catch-22, because the random sampling will determine a healthy representative, and if the healthy representative is seeded into a fuzzy clustering algorithm to group individuals and organically compartmentalize the data set, then any group will on…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:14 PM
7

The problem, as you've pointed out, is the nature of the evidence. We're still using unfalsifiable evidence. In this case, reported earnings. If one gender is more likely to cheat on their taxes, then that's enough to skew each and every one of these studies. Alas, the best we can do is keep adding metrics, and even that falls short because the people running the studies are subject to confirmation bias. Not because they want women to earn less, but because the people cutting the checks are expe…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:52 AM
1

I do something. You do something. I am paid more, because my something was better. If you are a woman and I am a man, then my something isn't better - it's the same something as your something. Ergo, I was paid more because I am a man. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that the client asked for a sports car and I gave him a sports car while you gave him a Belgium waffle.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:55 PM
3

You know what, I'm not above it, I love girlwriteswhat, but it needs to be said. What's she doing out of the kitchen?!? If you're bothered by humor, write a letter to management.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:11 PM
3

If this gets enough attention and people are willing to fund it, I'll throw my hat in the ring. I've run a software development company and an R&D subsidiary for 5 years now, and have created applications (desktop, web, and mobile) for businesses, universities, and significantly large organizations. Not to throw down a pitch or shamelessly plug myself, but I'd love to do something like this - and if there's a bit of cash involved it'd be easier to treat it as a genuine contract and not some pet …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:10 AM
3

Well, since you're a minority, I supposed I'll submit to my white guilt and do as you say. Also, I'd like to apologize for white people everywhere, especially white men, and give you...stuff. Such as...this brand new USB cable I have here! All jokes aside - yeah, I know. But I give more of a shit about letting other men, such as the lurkers here in /r/MensRights, know that it's alright to think and say these types of things. Thus why I posted the reply to her here and not on her blog. It would h…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:06 AM
7

So this is how gender studies students get their homework done... I must say, very clever.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:30 PM
1

Ah, my apologies then. Glad to be speaking with another veteran! IMHO, Comp Sci in academia needs to make that final split where Computational Theory and Computer Programming are their own departments/degrees. We're still forcing theoretical mathematicians to write GUIs in Java and Regular Joe code monkeys to understand the significance, and expound upon the intricacies, of NPC problems. The current academic regiment wastes far too much time, and we end up making a bunch of "well-rounded CS stud…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:56 PM
1

I've a strong background in data mining, clustering, complex statistical analyses, etc., but have only dabbled in natural language processing. I'd be more than happy to help you with anything dealing with ML. Although I'm not going to do your homework or code for you. Just so we're clear :).
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:49 PM
17

Dear Liza, I've achieved the highest level of education possible in both my fields. I own and operate my own business. This year I've saved one business from bankruptcy and helped several others, while also making time for individuals and small companies / nonprofits who aren't financially stable enough to afford quality professional services. I use my position to help those around me, and am in a state of constant debate both online and in person with anyone willing to spare five minutes of the…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:58 PM
3

I honestly don't know the first thing about Reddit's internal mechanisms, or how mods or admins go about setting up these types of bots. Given how open Reddit is, though, and that the vast majority of information is available in formats that are conducive to development (check out the /r/MensRights in JSON format for an example), there's really no need to integrate your bots into Reddit unless you have some highly specific need. The bot that copies self-posts is a good example of one that should…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:45 PM
3

I have, and the algorithm is fairly effective when given no more than a few comments. Using the metadata, such as the relationship with the parent (user's reply to comment or post) and the relationship with the children (replies to user's comment) helps better determine the likelihood of a troll. A few negative comments doesn't provide enough information to form any solid conclusions about the user, but trolls are easily exposed when viewing their comments in relation to the other comments and u…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 06:17 AM
5

You know, I used to think you were a bit of a dick, but I like your no-nonsense approach to these types of issues. And I never thought you were a dick, but it made for a good opener.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:12 AM
5

I've been giving this a lot of thought lately, and I want to try and create something that helps us more efficiently, effectively determine the likelihood of a troll. I started playing with the idea of determining a person's gender based on how they write, since an easy way to spot a troll is to catch them in a blatant lie - here the most obvious lie for trolls is claiming to be a male in need of help when actually being a female attempting to troll the subreddit. The idea wasn't all that great,…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:01 AM
6

In an anonymous forum, people can voice their opinions and concerns without fear of significant, tangible repercussion. Here we see first hand what some people, in this case feminists, actually believe. You can ignore them or you can argue with them, that's entirely up to you. Regardless, you should take note that feminist rhetoric is as strong as it is pervasive. We see our fair share of trolls here in /r/MensRights, and you should pay close attention that the hate, misandry, and general horsec…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:33 AM
2

I'd say track all financial movement for a couple of months then compare the results to reasonable estimates on cost of living in their area. Make an airtight argument and present it to the judge. I'd also say to ignore me and everyone else and talk to a lawyer first. Your username may be attached to your real name in some meaningful way, so do be careful here. If anything, find solace in the fact that boys do grow up to be men, and we can be lied to and manipulated up until the point we move aw…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:43 PM
2

It goes even deeper than this, I'm afraid. Any group of people - regardless of gender, locale, background, ethnicity - will inherently refuse to cede power. Women voting in a bloc is certainly part of it, so I don't mean to diminish your words, but I think the larger issue here is that we're saying, in so many words, "You have to much power here, please put some of it back," and there's absolutely no incentive for women to do so.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:36 PM
1

If anyone needs further proof, see troll and troll lies above. This is the sort of thing I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:16 PM
8

This isn't a Men's Rights issue. This is a Stephen King novel waiting to be written AND a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:07 PM
5

I couldn't care less about karma, the point is that the conversation in general is being buried by people who are actively, avidly against /r/MensRights They're not just interwebs points when the points themselves determine the visibility of the subject matter. If there's a significant number of people who work together to control what is seen and what is buried, then this place will become a troll haven before long. I agree with EvilPundit's sentiment, that we should also come together and supp…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:30 PM
5

The problem is that they do more than post stories, they aggressively attack anyone who disagrees with them and bring in downvote brigades on a regular basis. I've been here for a while, and I've only had a handful of conversations with other MRAs. If I had to ballpark it, I'd say 3-5%. The rest of the time I'm being harassed by feminists and white knights. I'm a reasonable guy, I stick to logic, I try to be kind. This has done me absolutely no good. Even when attempting to entertain civil debat…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:37 PM
1

Ratings from respondents are subjective and cannot be quantified, therefore the results/evidence holds no value. You assume that subjective opinions, such as those voiced in surveys, hold no value, or you assume I implied they hold no value. I stated that when dealing solely with subjective evidence that it's harder to recreate the conclusions. This is universally understood to be true, as a subjective study and the conclusions drawn from said study are much more difficult to recreate. To be cle…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:41 AM
1

You got it. What's more worrying to us is the T-shirt to the right, which appears to feature a checklist of excuses which bear an uncomfortable resemblance to those associated with domestic violence, all handily presented like a jauntily handwritten note. In summation, this social experiment has taught us that t-shirt slogans advocating domestic violence against men is inherently harmless, while those advocating domestic violence against women are socially abhorrent. Furthermore, indirectly sugg…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:32 AM
1

I'm well aware of how "research methodology" works, as I've published several times throughout my academic and professional career. Determining from a single paragraph that I don't understand "research methodology" is a bit of a stretch.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:19 AM
1

I understand where you are coming from. I certainly don't remember being indoctrinated to hate all men, I must have blocked that part of my education out. But, it must be true. Sociologically speaking, there is plenty of evidence connecting gender studies and feminism to the systematic vilification of men. Could easily be an argument about the women's movement of the sixities. No, it can't, because that movement led to the conversation we're having now, where you're attempting to reclaim Feminis…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:03 PM
2

From hereon forth, I declare Wombatmolestism to be a real and genuine movement. Anyone who likes the color blue is a Wombatmolestist. To be perfectly clear, if you like the color blue, you are a Wombatmolestist. You do not have to verbally consent to being a Wombatmolestist, you merely are because I say so. Furthermore, Wombatmolestism advocates for the acceptance of wombat molestation. Since you like the color blue, you are also for wombat molestation. Feminists suggest that they can like the c…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:37 PM
1

I try to avoid these types of studies because they rely heavily on amorphous psychological and sociological constructs that, while harboring some truth, cannot quantitatively determine any concrete conclusions. I could write a similar study to show that men in the southern hemisphere feel more pain than men in the northern hemisphere, but if my conclusions are based on subjective evidence, such as asking a million men from both hemispheres to rate their pain with a smiley face scale, then I cann…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:14 PM
5

Women do not have more pain receptors, per se. Men and women react to pain differently, physiologically speaking. In other words, one gender may mitigate pain more efficiently than the other, but pain is an ambiguous term and each gender may deal with different types of pain more or less effectively than the other. This is not, however, a matter of the number of pain receptors. From Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different Sex hormones are also known to affect pain responses, wh…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:59 PM
9

I'll just leave this here for your entertainment.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:41 AM
2

Ah, most excellent! I obtained my PhD is computational theory with a doctoral minor in Cog Psych and taught at a major university in the US for about five years, so I'm absolutely enthralled by this stuff. Out of curiosity, what country are you currently living/attending college? Please feel free to get in touch with me in the future if you ever need any help or guidance. Stay interested, and never shy away from research just because it makes some people uncomfortable!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:20 AM
2

The Gender Genie implementation is a simplified version of the algorithm, so its percentage of false positives is higher than an implementation that explicitly follows the algorithm. I had similar results when running a double blind on a few thousand randomly selected comments from /r/mensrights and /r/twoxchromosomes, and my conclusion was that: Given the informal nature of forums, people are more likely to deviate from the words most often employed by their gender. The keywords used by the Gen…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:06 AM
1

Then essentially you're claiming that there's no serious debate that could possibly exist regarding academic research. The author of the program has his own implementation which he admits isn't perfect, but that's his implementation of another person's algorithm. The people who wrote and published the algorithm also created their own implementation and had far better results. He admits his implementation was more simplistic and his results weren't as favorable, but that's part of the intelligent…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:03 PM
1

Did you bother to read my reply? Or read the OP where I state very clearly that it's not perfect? The validity and accuracy of the implementation is beside the point. It's the fact that I was downvoted into oblivion by SRS and no serious debate ever actually occurred.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:10 PM
1

One of the issues /r/MensRights faces is determining how to effectively handle the SRS invasions and downvote brigades. I understand the mods are tolerant, and we don't slam the ban hammer 'round these parts without damn good reason, but... I posted this a couple of days ago, because I'm an MRA. Because I'm a scientist. Because I thought the concept was interesting. Because I thought it could be useful. Because I thought, at the very least, it'd be an intellectually stimulating debate about the …
/r/MensRights08/04/12 03:22 PM
-5

Female Score: 123 Male Score: 40 The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female! Alright.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:29 PM
-1

We agree that it's weak, yes, but that doesn't inherently imply that it's utterly useless and cannot determine gender with any degree of certainty. Within this thread alone it's been accurate the majority of the time. I think you did misread, and I'm certainly not trying to quarrel needlessly here, but I stated: The algorithm isn't perfect, and there are bound to be false-positives, so avoid using this to trump people in an argument or attempt to say that the results are absolutely irrefutable. …
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:50 PM
-5

His implementation is a simplified version of the algorithm. He admits his version is weak, not that the algorithm is weak. It's intellectually dishonest to say that it's worse than useless. That being said, I think the results should be taken with a grain of salt, but certainly not ignored entirely. From my observations of his implementation, and observations of my implementation, this is a fascinating algorithm that is essentially grounded in reality. By reality, I mean the original algorithm …
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:22 PM
-1

There are ways to train the algorithm based on external data sources, and it would undoubtedly strengthen the algorithm. The research indicates they pulled several fiction, nonfiction, and informal sources, something around 1000 works of literature, to train the existing algorithm. It's fairly accurate, as our troll is allowing us to see first hand, but words shift, language is a dynamic beast. The algorithm also considers contractions strongly feminine, so I'd be curious to see if leetspeak, or…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:09 PM
0

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female! Well, if there's a counterpoint to be made, I doubt it'll come from you. Thanks for the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:04 PM
0

Ha! I didn't even think to check my own post, but that's pretty cool. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:53 PM
2

Would you mind explaining why you believe the score is ambiguous? Also, I'm a bit confused as to why you initially state the algorithm works, then later state that it doesn't work. Would you also mind explaining why you blatantly contradict yourself? Do you simply not want this to be true? Anyone can aimlessly and foolishly make claims, but having recreated the procedure I can honestly say there's not much to criticize. It's theoretically sound, and the author of the article has been published s…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:48 PM
-2

As an example of Gender Genie's usefulness, user ineedhelpnow1234 recently posted asking for help and advice, gave an update, and ultimately turned out to be a troll. She claims to be a man, but analyzing her comments consistently delivers the same results - she is a woman.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:39 AM
2

This may not be popular, and I certainly don't mean to suggest it's a methodology we should all adopt, but it's worked for me in the past so I wanted to share it with everyone here. If you're genuinely worried about a woman's ability to cry rape and ruin your life without the slightest shred of evidence, then start paying closer attention to the incentives involved with the trade. The trade, of course, being sex. If you have sex with a woman who is single, genuinely into you, seems to enjoy your…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:46 PM
3

Never expose personal information online - even through emails. Even if you send someone your Reddit password over email, if someone guesses your email password then they technically have both. If your password can be found in the dictionary, you have a weak password - add numbers and symbols to your word. make sure your password contains at least 2 numbers and 2 symbols, do not put them all at the beginning or the end of the word. make sure your password is at least 8 characters long, try for 1…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:34 PM
0

She seems viscerally upset, and I deeply empathize with her raw, maddening desire to shut someone the hell up, but this will unfortunately serve as evidence to the trolls that she will give attention when sufficiently provoked. I was hoping for a 30 second video where she reports in and states, as per her latest correspondence, that she has to call it short as there's genuinely nothing of substance or merit to discuss. What bothers me most about the tone of this latest video is that the frustrat…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:25 PM
6

I can't tell you what to do, nor can I presume I know what you need to do, so please take this with a grain of salt. It's only been a day. You're not responding, you're reacting. We all get frustrated, but don't give up. Walk away, cool off for a bit, and come back to the fight. We need people like you. I'll take over for you temporarily and hand back the reigns when you're ready - honestly and seriously. Don't quit on us.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:32 PM
1

I think you'll find that most MRAs are perfectly reasonable and logical, and that they do agree with me - generally speaking. The problem is that we're not allowed to have extremists, or even overly dramatic members for that matter. We're held to a absurdly high standard, and I'm afraid it's a target we'll never hit. It's impossible to have zero crazy people in any given movement. We're depicted as a group comprised largely of extremists with a toxic public image rivaling that of the GOP, but I …
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:53 PM
4

You now have two doctors who agree with you. You must be right.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:41 PM
0

I completely agree. I wish yours was the top comment - sarcasm and all. You may not be an MRA or frequent this subreddit, but I hope this doesn't turn you away or give you the wrong impression. We're trying our best to eliminate this type of rhetoric because it genuinely doesn't help increase the visibility of these issues. Bringing out the truths behind circumcision is one of our primary concerns, but this level of sensationalism doesn't work. I'm disappointed to see it getting so much attentio…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:20 PM
2

We must let the people decide for themselves. I understand the frustration you're emphasizing with your point, I genuinely do, but there's very little you can do about people who are easily swayed by victim-card pulling or name calling. Instead of maneuvering around it, just ignore it entirely. Stick to the topic, stick to the information, stick to arguing the ideas. The intelligent, rational people in the crowd are listening and will walk away if they see the conversation's devolved into an ego…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:07 PM
8

While you have a point, we need to constantly remind ourselves as well as each other that we're arguing against ideas, not people. Taking your premise as fact, where our mere existence offends feminists, strengthens this idea. While I don't personally take this premise as fact, I do believe there is some truth to it. If you're going to argue religion with the religious, remember that you're arguing something they consider true, whole, and irrefutable. Arguing their obstinance just throws fuel on…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:39 PM
5

It's not interpreting 'men' as a misspelling of 'women', though, so 'men' having two fewer letters than 'women' has nothing to do with it. While typing 'men' but intending 'women' is statistically unlikely, that statistical unlikeliness isn't factored into this particular equation. Look at it this way: Say 1000 people search for "inequalities women face" and 10 people search for "inequalities men face", and that these 1010 people and these 1010 searches are the only ones to have ever existed. A …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:08 AM
3

Given my reply to WittyThrowawayName here, this isn't sexist, but it does tell us that people are more aware of female inequalities - if you'll allow the assumption that Google searches are a fairly accurate indicator of general societal concerns.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:30 AM
24

I'm not being pedantic here and correcting you, I'm just better explaining what you've already said. It's not so much that this particular phrase was used - it has more to do with the occurrence of the combinations of words. "Inequalities women face" comes up as a correction not because it's technically searched for more often than "inequalities men face", but because the expressions created by mixing and matching "female", "inequalities", and "face", yield percentages, and these percentages dic…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:26 AM
2

Indeed, but do try to put this into perspective. This genuinely isn't a gender thing, it's a relationship thing. The notion of "taming" or "training" has been around for a very long time. Selfish people want to train, reasonable people want to compromise. Don't let anyone hijack this and turn it into another battle in gender warfare.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:51 AM
2

Try to veer the conversation in the direction of selfless/selfish compromising, and away from "SO training" based on gender. A healthy relationship requires compromise, and part of compromising is entertaining your SO's observations and criticisms. The obligations we have are to give our SO the benefit of the doubt first, and determine the level of selflessness/selfishness of the request second. "Please make a conscious effort to take the initiative to clean the kitchen more often," has nothing …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:02 AM
6

I'm pulling this from a previous comment of mine because of it's relevancy. The top reply to your comment refers to our lack of credibility, and I'd like for everyone to stop and think about that for a second. Selection bias and jilted perceptions are hard at work here, and we've been busting our asses regardless in order to be heard as well as recognized as a legitimate subreddit filled with individuals who genuinely support Men's Rights. Countless others have come here from other subreddits be…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:51 PM
5

Reddit Enhancement Suite Settings Console: Users: User Tagger: hardIgnore: On. Then simply scroll over the troll's username and click 'ignore'. Seriously - it's made my life so much easier. The trolls don't even show up anymore - not at all.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:07 AM
1

I think the sentiment was worded poorly. I'll admit that some of them genuinely do think defaulting to the husband's decision is the right and only way. However, I believe that this mindset - having the wife defer to the husband to make certain decisions - carries with it the advantage and expectation that the husband is also capable of deferring to the wife's decisions. The compromise is that sometimes it's the husband saying in a clear voice, "you are the wife, we will do it your way, since in…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:18 PM
12

Let me preface this by stating that I'm not referring to you specifically with what I'm about to say, I'm referring to the type of person you represent; the lurker who occasionally stumbles into /r/MensRights. Selection bias and jilted perceptions are hard at work here, and we've been busting our asses regardless in order to be heard as well as recognized as a legitimate subreddit filled with individuals who genuinely support Men's Rights. Countless others have come here from other subreddits be…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 02:48 PM
19

Is this a bit absurd? Yes. Is this from a college campus where they have to report absolutely everything for fear of losing funding? Yes. Campus cops are not only restrained by their breadth of jurisdiction and lack of holistic authority, they're also forced to put up with the 'all students are someone's child, and all children are special' mentality. Also, money. I'm not excusing it, but this is campus police, please put it into perspective.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:25 PM
5

I watched several women with half as much drive and intelligence get their Ph.D.s more quickly than I did. It isn't just the celerity at which they obtained their doctorates, it's also the fact that they received their doctorates. This is far from being a flimsy, subjective opinion. Look at their research, observe where their research is being published, observe the quality of those journals and conferences, observe the frequency at which they publish, and observe how heavily cited their publica…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:50 PM
2

That aspect upsets me as well. When I stated "it amazes me how..." above, I was referring to the people who are upset that we're against circumcision. It blows my mind that there are people blindly advocating this on nothing more than marginal health benefits (decreases the probability of contracting certain STDs, the benefits can't be seen culturally unless you're in a third world country) and tradition. Before I educated myself on this topic I was equally as blind, if not more so. Now it's as …
/r/MensRights26/02/12 10:48 AM
1

If you can't get behind either side of this issue, if nothing really sticks out as a pro or con to you, then leave it up to your son. If you genuinely don't care, and most women don't - they see it as harmless and they view us as making a big deal out of nothing, then don't act. Don't cut. Just leave it be. I'm not speaking to you directly when I say this, but it amazes me how many people become so viscerally upset about circumcision when the most simplistic, efficient, cost effective, common se…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 05:58 AM
6

We speak to be heard. Immediate gratification is a poor measure for the worth of one's words. Be reasonable, be logical, be kind. This is the internet - a year from now someone may change their mind after reading your comments.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:39 PM
2

Indeed, though I'm not convinced sperm count per se is enough to radically alter a human's higher cognitive processes. Not to suggest hormones don't run joyously rampant through our bodies and often heavily influence our behaviors, but sexuality is significantly more complex than a mood swing. I want to be careful not to juxtapose small behavioral offsets with gender identity and sexuality, regardless of their possible genesis re: BPA exposure. That being said, a decreased sperm count is not the…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:57 AM
2

We can ask, sure, but you're jumping the gun here. Imagine the number of steps you'd have to take, the funding you'd require, and the evidence you'd have to provide if you were going to prove that antibiotics makes people racist. This example's arguably a stretch, but I mean for it to emphasize exactly what you're suggesting here. You're not measuring CRH neurons or observing differences in specific points of bodily chemistry, you're making a very bold, very specific claim that BPA leads to homo…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:46 AM
2

If BPA does have some observable affect on humans that isn't statistically negligible, I would wager it's far more subtle, more nuanced than you believe. I would argue it'd be more along the lines of Toxoplasmosis Gondii, and less along the lines of explicit chemical-behavioral modifications. This question is hard to ask but harder to answer. In order to determine if your theory is statistically significant enough to warrant proper research, we'd need to determine BPA's influence relative to eve…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:39 AM
1

I'd like to point this out to put things into perspective. FTA: [...] fewer than five of BU’s 33,000 students this academic year have faced charges related to sexual assault, according to a school official. If that seems odd to you, here are the 2010 crime statistics for The University of Georgia. In short, 5 out of 33,000 students faced charges at BU (0.015%), 3 out of 35,000 students faced charges at UGA (0.086%). Anything drawn from these numbers would be an educated guess, so I won't pander …
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:55 PM
-4

Out of curiosity, why is a male raping a handicapped female, an extremely rare, odd, awkward situation that has more to do with his age than his gender, your go-to example here? I'm not busting your balls or anything, it just seems as if you're intentionally setting up a damning comparison. In this instance I agree that we've a group of people that went full retard, no pun intended, but still - come on - it's a bit of a stretch to use that as an example of the so called "rape culture".
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:43 PM
10

There's one thing I've learned from women when it comes to sex in long-term relationships and marriages, and it's this: Women are usually very upfront with you when something appears to be wrong, such as a dwindling sex life, a lack of passion, etc. Both Men and women are quick to write it off as their SO not being as attracted to them, being too comfortable in the relationship, possibly seeing someone else - the usual suspects, really. Women, however, bring it up almost immediately and say exac…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:43 PM
3

It's partly cultural, partly logical. Cultural, because it's so deeply ingrained in our expectations regarding boys. Logical, because there are examples of circumcision, as a co-factor, helping protect cultures against the spread of HIV. Note this study suggesting circumcision may reduce the spread of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. People often confuse this sociological, anthropological approach to circumcision as raw justification. Yes, it reduces the spread of infection in sub-Saharan Af…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 10:09 PM
5

Oh, don't get me wrong - please don't misinterpret my passion for vindictiveness. I never thought you were questioning my honesty. Medically, circumcision does very little, if anything, for boys. It does not prevent HPV/HIV or other infections. Culturally, it is very much tied to our religiosity and our dominant religions. Male genital mutilation does decrease various aspects of sensitivity. The results are often mixed because our real question here is about pleasure, not sensitivity. Pleasure i…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter