TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

1-10 Scale: An Analysis

scottishredpill

August 24, 2013
0 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 1-10 Scale: An Analysis
Author

scottishredpill

Upvotes 0
Comments 10
Date August 24, 2013 2:42 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1l05js/110_scale_an_analysis/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/1-10-scale-an-analysis.233301
https://theredarchive.com/post/233301
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by scottishredpill

Night game, things I forgot after 16 months in an LTR

230 upvotes
June 29, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

The Archetypal Modern Woman

130 upvotes
August 16, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

The Eternal Solipsism of the Female Mind

115 upvotes
September 26, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Pro Tip: Next time you're out gaming, tell chicks you're a convicted murderer...

83 upvotes
October 2, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Learning to behave

80 upvotes
December 31, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Happy 38th! How I got AMOGed...

77 upvotes
June 30, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

[FR] An evening in a rock bar (f-close)

74 upvotes
July 24, 2013
/r/seduction

The one time I tried to play Cupid...

71 upvotes
June 26, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–][deleted] 10 points10 points10 points 12 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]puck_mar1n3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The binary scale is better:

0 = I do not want to fuck her. 1 = I do want to fuck her.

That's the only scale that's needed. Attractive/unattractive and everyone is going to use different criteria to determine that.

Maybe there's need for a third rating: "I want to fuck her but I wouldn't date her"

[–]nSaneMadness-1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Binary scale. I like it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I prefer:

*1 = Will not bang.

*2 = Will bang secretly.

*3 = Will bang proudly.

[–]RedSunBlue1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the US 32% of women aged 20-39 are obese.

Jeezuz H Christ. I think the number of overweight women in Japan for the same age group is less than 10%. And that's by Japanese standards.

[–]JohnPeel1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The scale is fine as is, since the aim of the game is to get the most attractive woman for you. So when you say a 5, or a 7 or whatever, everyone can picture a woman that matches on their own scale.

[–]16 MGaiusScaevolus0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting take on it.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting, but not important. The 1-10 scale isn't, has never been, and could never be, an objective scale for sorting female attractiveness. It's just a quick way of describing how attractive a woman is to someone who can't see her.

So it doesn't matter if this woman is a 5 or a 7. Personally, she doesn't do that much for me, so I'd call her a 5.5. Others might note her lack of any obvious flaws, and call her a 7. Neither is "wrong". Because 5.5 or 7 is just our shorthand way of describing how attractive we found this girl.

[–]the_letter_P-2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be honest, the whole scale thing is silly. Its just a tool that was invented to try and gauge how attractive a girl was when reporting it to other people.

However, you shouldn't really care too much about reporting it to other people or trying to prove yourself. The only scale that matters (if you really need a scale other than 'yes' or 'no') is relative to the girls you have fucked already.

Was she the most attractive girls I've fucked?

Was she more attractive than the last?

Is she attractive enough for me to fuck?

Not to mention I have seen people rating the same girl a 4 all the way up to a 7, so it kinda loses all meaning.

If you are doing a field report, then you can fare just as well with descriptive words which paint a better picture anyway. Stuff like "relatively cute", "average attractiveness", "really attractive". Not to mention many people learning this are at different stages in the game, so someone reporting their success of getting with a HB5 might sound lame, but relative to their previous successes they have made a big achievement.

I know I've personally don't a handful of 3s and 4s in my time :/

[–]InsanityManifest -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like a 1-30 scale. 1-10s are girls I would never associate with, ever and has more to do with attitude than anything else (fat feminists, rude lesbians, man-haters, etc). 11-20s are girls I'd have sex with but would never even bother trying to start a genuine relationship with (club sluts for example; pretty only with makeup and dumb as a post). 20-25 are girls with good looks and decent personalities to back them up (I only run into about 2-3 of these types a year and I'm pretty social). 25-30 girls don't exist but, if they did I'd treat them the same as I do everyone else.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter