~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
scottishredpill
[–][deleted] 10 points10 points10 points 12 years ago | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]puck_mar1n3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The binary scale is better: 0 = I do not want to fuck her. 1 = I do want to fuck her.
The binary scale is better:
0 = I do not want to fuck her. 1 = I do want to fuck her.
That's the only scale that's needed. Attractive/unattractive and everyone is going to use different criteria to determine that.
Maybe there's need for a third rating: "I want to fuck her but I wouldn't date her"
[–]nSaneMadness-1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Binary scale. I like it.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I prefer:
*1 = Will not bang.
*2 = Will bang secretly.
*3 = Will bang proudly.
[–]RedSunBlue1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the US 32% of women aged 20-39 are obese.
Jeezuz H Christ. I think the number of overweight women in Japan for the same age group is less than 10%. And that's by Japanese standards.
[–]JohnPeel1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The scale is fine as is, since the aim of the game is to get the most attractive woman for you. So when you say a 5, or a 7 or whatever, everyone can picture a woman that matches on their own scale.
[–]16 MGaiusScaevolus0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Interesting take on it.
[–]TRP VanguardWhisper0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Interesting, but not important. The 1-10 scale isn't, has never been, and could never be, an objective scale for sorting female attractiveness. It's just a quick way of describing how attractive a woman is to someone who can't see her.
So it doesn't matter if this woman is a 5 or a 7. Personally, she doesn't do that much for me, so I'd call her a 5.5. Others might note her lack of any obvious flaws, and call her a 7. Neither is "wrong". Because 5.5 or 7 is just our shorthand way of describing how attractive we found this girl.
[–]the_letter_P-2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
To be honest, the whole scale thing is silly. Its just a tool that was invented to try and gauge how attractive a girl was when reporting it to other people.
However, you shouldn't really care too much about reporting it to other people or trying to prove yourself. The only scale that matters (if you really need a scale other than 'yes' or 'no') is relative to the girls you have fucked already.
Was she the most attractive girls I've fucked?
Was she more attractive than the last?
Is she attractive enough for me to fuck?
Not to mention I have seen people rating the same girl a 4 all the way up to a 7, so it kinda loses all meaning.
If you are doing a field report, then you can fare just as well with descriptive words which paint a better picture anyway. Stuff like "relatively cute", "average attractiveness", "really attractive". Not to mention many people learning this are at different stages in the game, so someone reporting their success of getting with a HB5 might sound lame, but relative to their previous successes they have made a big achievement.
I know I've personally don't a handful of 3s and 4s in my time :/
[–]InsanityManifest -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like a 1-30 scale. 1-10s are girls I would never associate with, ever and has more to do with attitude than anything else (fat feminists, rude lesbians, man-haters, etc). 11-20s are girls I'd have sex with but would never even bother trying to start a genuine relationship with (club sluts for example; pretty only with makeup and dumb as a post). 20-25 are girls with good looks and decent personalities to back them up (I only run into about 2-3 of these types a year and I'm pretty social). 25-30 girls don't exist but, if they did I'd treat them the same as I do everyone else.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 10 points10 points10 points | Copy Link
[–]puck_mar1n3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nSaneMadness-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RedSunBlue1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JohnPeel1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]16 MGaiusScaevolus0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TRP VanguardWhisper0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_letter_P-2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InsanityManifest -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link